Comments on: Sentencing Scooter Live Blog Part I

By: dana

dana — Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:29:38 +0000

Judge Walton is a hero.
He is upholding the judicial system as our founders envisioned it and he is upholding the constitution. He is not bending to the will of the neo-cons. I hope everyone will be appreciative of this American hero. While expected, I hate the fact that he is receiving such terrible threats. Stand strong. The American People are behind you.

By: Tonyojn

Tonyojn — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:13:31 +0000

http://ewqrawafsdreb.host.com
desk3
[url=http://ewqsawafsdreb.host.com]desk4[/url]
[link=http://ewqaawafsdreb.host.com]desk6[/link]

By: MarkH

MarkH — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:40:08 +0000

brassband @ 138

Walton’s anger may flow from a realization that he can’t do what he wants to do . . .

Hmmm, his first priority is justice and we all know justice is served, not ordered around like a law clerk.

By: MarkH

MarkH — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:34:45 +0000

theExile @ 110

To Paul: Do you think maybe Libby should be imprisoned for his own protection?

Now that’s an interesting suggestion.

I can see it now: Bush decides to let Scooter out until his appeal is decided and Scooter says no because he’d rather go to a secure place where he’ll be safe. Then whether his appeal overturns the conviction he’ll have spent a little time in jail, but not enough to leave him squalling “Mommy” the way Paris did.

Poor girl. I feel sorry for her. She’s just not built for that kind of treatment. Of course, few people are.

By: Aaron B. Brown

Aaron B. Brown — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:43:11 +0000

Liddy is going to jail, how many days before his partner in in crime, the president, springs and then they both make a run for the border?

By: bushworstpresidentever

bushworstpresidentever — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:34:26 +0000

Just to expand, I think that Silberman is personally aquainted with Libby to an extent that he might have to recuse himself on this.

Not a snowball’s chance in hell that he recuses himself.

By: capemh

capemh — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:07:19 +0000

And in US v North, the question was whether the AG had the right to intercede over his independent prosecutor, not whether the independent prosecutor could handle CIPA by himself, with the grant from Comey

By: spurious

spurious — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:06:33 +0000

Neil @ 121

Paul @ 87 “As to your comment that the right wing media stirs these people up. That is also dishonest at best. There is not one major conservative site that called for people to write and threaten Judge walton. Not one. “

Because of course only a direct request or subjunctive horatory would be sufficient proof that “right wing media stirs these people up.”

For a guy who’s not interested in a debate, you’re sure seem to be doing just that or perhaps what you meant was: Don’t take issue with my assertions.

Yup.

Linky

By: aussie

aussie — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:01:40 +0000

and at least I admit it

By: aussie

aussie — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:59:24 +0000

Paul
You are a liar. I never said lincoln was a democrat You can’t even get your facts straight.
Dr. King’s and President Kennedy’s assasinations were by innocent mad people?
Are you fucking mad?
You are an implausible source although me losing my temper also means I am.