***MORE BREAKING NEWS: There will be an announcement regarding the WH bringing former RNC head Ed Gillespie onto staff. Details emerging at the moment, with an announcement scheduled for later this afternoon. More as I get it on this one also. (The new Dan Bartlett, perhaps? Gillespie was always good with the spin machinations, even if he comes across as a smarmy weasel. Emptywheel has some great thoughts on this.)***
GSA head Laurita Doan testifies today before the House Government Oversight Committee. C-Span3 is broadcasting the testimony live, including on their streaming feed online. Buckle up — and wipe those water glasses, because you never know who might want your fingerprints. (Little joke from Ms. Doan’s last appearance, for those who missed it.)
[Photo of fingerprint on water glass via John.Nathaniel.]
REP. CUMMINGS QUESTIONS: Says he’s having trouble figuring out what her testimony even is. Cummings says that Doan previously said that government agencies should not be participating in partisan political activity. Says that she said to committee and to OSC that she doesn’t care about polls or politics. Cummings says he wants to ask about these statements — you are RNC regent along with husband. Goes into statements that Doan has made about swinging black votes in small business community to the GOP — as SBA head, a job she wanted, she said she’d be able to steer support to push black business people into supporting GOP through loan offers and other programs. Doan says that she hadn’t had a Hatch Act briefing at that point. Cummings says the problem is that there is information that looks one way but that she is saying something else — and that he isn’t sure from her testimony where the political operation ends and the truth begins in terms of what she says versus what she does.
REP. DAVIS QUESTIONS: Davis has managed to say “African-American Woman Entrepreneur” at least four times just in his first question. Talking point, anyone?
REP. BURTON QUESTIONS: Says this is very amusing for him. Says that Waxman won’t get Stephen Hadley before the committee to talk about his conduct in destroying…oops, I mean Sandy Berger. Waxman says “You are right. We can’t get Stephen Hadley here.” Much laughter. And there it is…the daily Burton “Clinton did it.” commentary — today’s version is Johnny Chung and the Lippo Group. Rep. Burton is reliving his subpoena glory days here. Again. Burton is giving the opening statement that he didn’t get to give earlier.
REP. CLAY QUESTIONS: Doan says she’s been a Republican for decades — supported Elizabeth Dole initially, then Bush in 2000. Going through details of testimony prepared for today versus what was said to OSC and/or Congress. Back and forth about what she did or did not mean in the OSC testimony, Clay says she was critical of other GSA employees — Doan says if you look at it in context, she was only critical because the OSC wanted her to be or something to that effect. Arguing back and forth about whether Clay is or is not asking questions that Doan can or cannot answer.
REP. CUMMINGS QUESTION: Political fundraising improprieties — Cummings quoting past reviews of Burton’s investigations. [CHS notes: Jeebus, now we're talking about Burton and not the matter at hand. Please don't fall into their media circus ploy, for hell's sakes.]
Davis gives Burton a chance to respond with his ad naseum blather about “Clinton did it.” Again.
REP. ISSA QUESTIONS: Begins by trying to characterize the narrative thus far today in which Democrats wear the black hats and Republicans wear the white ones in Issa’s mind. Issa now detailing to which charities Doan has donated money in the past — talk about your “rehabilitate your witness reputation” attempt.
REP. TIERNEY QUESTIONS: Back to performance questions about GSA employees — and Doan saying that she doesn’t want to speculate, but that questions still exist on the bonus and other issues because Doan was talking in the present tense about employees who participated with the Committee — that the employees will not be getting promoted or will not be getting bonuses until extensive rehabilitation has occurred. Doan doesn’t want to answer the question, and tries to start down the “context” road again.
There is a kerfuffle about whether Doan is answering the question, whether Tierney has a right to an actual answer, or what between Davis and Waxman and Tierney. Waxman explains that Doan needs to answer the questions, not to give a monologue. Back to questions again.
Tierney asks why Doan would say that the employees will not be getting bonuses or promotions until they have proved they deserve them after testifying to Congress. Doan says that she sometimes has problems with tense and personal pronouns if Tierney would take a look at the transcript, he would see that. Doan says that she won’t retaliate or will not retaliate against employees because that would reflect badly on them for future employment. Doan says she is “all about improvement.”
REP. DAVIS QUESTIONS: Says that it is conjecture and interpretation on whether or not Doan said she would retaliate against employees.
Going to start a fresh thread…
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Zod
CNN (?) reported Gillespie will replace Dan Bartlett.
zed? Not.
Christy!
TheOtherWA @ 2
Dizzie?
OT-Durbin is questioning von Spakovsky in the FEC nomination hearing. Durbin’s good. :)
So why did you break the Hatch act, if you understood it so well!
Enough of the race card Davis…enough!
junglefreak @ 5
Aren’t they all?
Crazy Dan up!!
I’m thankful for the live blogging. I can’t get Cspan3 to stream (and I do know what I’m doing).
also BREAKING, and
very likely related to
the subpoenas issuing
this morning:
john conyers has decided
to play a game of “what’s
my line” (ref. 1960s-era
television show!) — holding
a hearing tomorrow at one p.m. on. . .
wait for it. . .
“XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX“
i am crappin’ you negative!
take a look!
[i suspect sara taylor or
harriett miers will appear. . .]
erh — zed?
Davis: You’re an African American Republican which is why there’s a big bullseye on you
Burton wants Stephen Hadley? Ah, no it’s SANDY BERGER TIME! Can’t get BErger Burton wants to knwo why. Wants Valerie back…
I am going to miss all of this today, I am the only one in the shop.
Please take pity and try and give an over view.
Thanks in advance.
dakine01 @ 14
He’s going to regret that fuckup.
Oh my GOD they’re bringing up Gore and Clinton!
Now Burton on Al Gore and campaign money from Johnny
Chung beating up on Wax…
So Doan said she would accept her responsibilty and not blame others. Yet she has allowed the Republicans allow her to avoid answering questions, waffle, weave and blame the focus on her criminal behaviour on being, “A Republican, a minority and a woman”.
Come on Republicans have now brought up Plame, Berger, leaks of this investigation, Buddhist temples, Clinton funding……here comes the lies about a b/j…..
Dickbag Dan Burton is now reviewing Democratic malfeasance from the past 50 years.
Let’s hear about Tip O’Neill and Tongsun Park for God’s sake.
Jesus H. Christ.
-GSD
Burton still blathering about Clinton…
Amazing how the keep harping on the Clinton admin!
And yet the rethugs have had years of House control to have all the hearings they wanted!
Why didn’t they?
Burton back on Valerie Plame again. They must REALLY be worried about ol’ Scoots with the concentration on Valeri and trying to discredit her today…
got a question for the witness there, Dan?
Does Burton really want to stake his party on whether or not people remember things? Abu GOnzales anyone?
Busted, here it is:
Davis: You are here because you are black.
Doan: You hate me cuz I’m Black. Libby and I took down the Berlin wall together. Otherwise, I did good, I had bad employees.
Everyone else: Just tell the truth ma’am.
Burton:
Here we go with Sandy Berger again. Woops, thought he was Stephen Hadley for a couple minutes.
Valerie Plame.
Al Gore Buddhist campaign contributions.
Bill Clinton took Chinese money.
Janet Reno.
Valerie Plame broke the law.
You defended corruption in the Clinton Admin.
We have begged and begged for hearings on these things.
Ms. Doan’s not saying she can’t remember anything!!
Hypocrisy on your side of the aisle.
Witch hunt – WE had documented evidence
It is PAST TIME for a smack down of these turds, Henry.
The Republicans should be completely and absolutely ashamed of themselves. This line of comments and distractions by the Republicans could be used by groups for commercials against the Republicans.
Burton going along with the public humiliation of a woman who put her life on the line for National Security. Burton ANOTHER TRAITOR to National Security and our constitution!
Plame came voluntarily.
Hello Burton Plame came you idiot!
O/t -
Anyone else getting the rolling refresh comments going fubar at apparently the same time a new post goes up?
jayt @ 24
Burton is a douchebag. These asshats are disgusting. Is that all they have? Blame it on Clinton?
Thank you Marcy for the link to your TNH post on June 2 about who leaked the names of GSA employee.
Would you comment on the baiting of Waxman?
Burton and Davis are outrageous – they bring up old OLD situations (Berger?), and alleged lying charges against Valery Plame (huh??) – they sound ridiculous. Did Dems behave this badly on these committees when Repubs were in charge of committees during Clinton era? This really aggravates me – why don’t they stick to the darned topic ?? I am beginning to suffer from cognitive dissonance by OSMOSIS.
Burton: We know Bill Clinton killed Jonbenet and abducted the Lindbergh child…why didn’t you investigate those cases.
-GSD
Let them, they are digging a hole for themselves so deep we won’t see them again for years.
OMG… I can’t listen this…. what a bunch of idiots…
Clinton did it…. Clinton did it….
Doan… “I am wonderful”… “you are a bunch of meanies”
Hypocrisy…on the DEM side of the aisle?!! A witch hunt?
Rep. Dan Burton is a schnook and a disingenuous whiner. Next!
Waccamaw @ 30
Yes.
emptywheel @ 25
I know, that comment about Doan not claiming she doesn’t remember anything is steeped in irony.
GSD: Mr. Chair, would it be out of line to call Congressman Burton a red-face douchebag?
-GSD
He asked about small business contracts?
noen @ 38
That’s how I figure out a new post is up.
GSD @ 34
You forgot Vince Foster, Ron Brown ..I could go on
She’s parsing her statements now
yikes, lost my connection
Gillespie is being brought inside the tent to get RNC activity under executive privilege cover, don’t ya think?
GSD @ 40
He kinda looks like Uncle Charlie from My Three Sons.
Where was Dan Burton and Republican oversight the last 6 years?
Dems making no progress here. Repubs using their time to score talking points. So far.
“Ed Gillespie…a smarmy weasel.”
Rodent redux? Bartlett at least “smiled” when he picked your pocket. Gillespie is more in the line of “frothing-at-the-mouth rabid paranoid wingnut weasels” where everything is a DFH (dirty, feckin’ hippie) conspiracy to extinguish the America-Use It or Lose It Weasel species.
Gillespie’s only faint hope to stave off the end of Western Xtian/Likud Civilization is that weasels breed like…weasels. Why Ed is lookin’ around right now for someone to f…
I like Doan angry. It’s a good look on her.
But I don’t know that Clay is going to be able to close the logic–that either the witnesses were telling the truth, or they weren’t. And Doan’s suggestion is that they weren’t.
bg @ 26
P R I C E L E S S !
707
and spot-on!
None of my previous answers count because they were asking leading questions — Doan.
Does this put Eddie Haskell, er, Gillespie, under the invisibility cloak of executive privilege as a way to hide his earlier work? Presumably, as a former RNC chairman and political operative, he may have had his fingers in a few recently made pies and it would have been awkward had Congress asked about them.
Lurita’s strategy is to nitpick and talk out the clock for each questioner.
ooh, Burton’s gettin’ hot.
Hugh @ 48
They needed to rest from their vigorous oversight of Clinton’s personal life.
earlofhuntingdon @ 53
DING! that will be their operative theory.
of course, it is just so much horseh!t. . .
Hugh @ 54
Same game as last time.
Let’s supboena Bill Cinton’s cock postehaste.
-GSD
Godamn I HATE these people. Clinton, Clinton, Clinton. Hey F**K YOU. Wrong decade jacka**!! Jeez.
Is suggesting that a witness is lying something that can backfire on her? She is under oath right? Wouldn’t making a false allegation like that earn you a cell next to Scooter?
Burton up again. This is a very black helicopters kind of guy. Totally and absolutely delusional.
GSD @ 59
You’re killin’ me!!!
Why do the Repubs keep attacking Valerie Plame? They are accusing her of doing something illegal. What is going on, and what are they referring to?
Mandrake @ 47
It is amazing to me how willing these Republicans are willing to rake Valerie Plame over the coals. She has had her identity revealed by the Bush administration and the nation that she served, by Robert Novak and now the Republicans continue to slide her service and life through the dirt. This sure will make young people want to serve their country by joining secret service, Cia, F.B.I. they will come running to serve after watching what the Republicans are willing to do to you if you serve your nation by putting your life on the line like Plame did for National Security.
LS @ 64
Don’t know what they’re scared of but obviously something is up.
noen & ifthethunderdontgetya –
Thanks. Hope that’s one of the bugs that will get worked out.
thunder -
You’ll appreciate that CNN is running *news* about someone getting struck by lightening. If I call it in, do ya think maybe they’ll do a piece on my ingrown toenail? ;-)
The pugs are scared of something here….they are still playing for the audience and distracting the hearing. Something is there they do not want out and they are pulling the stops out far more than they have done on other witnesses lately it seems….are they that afraid she is going to self destruct that they don’t want her to speak? Waxman just takes notes and lets little zingers go from time to time..what does he have that the pugs are fearing?
oh god, the creepy, mobbed-up Issa
LS @ 64
One word: Obfuscation
Issa;
“Unabashed loyal Republicans”
read liars, cheats and scoundrels…
Did Issa say how horrible it was to have your private life made public? Did he say that?
Hugh @ 55
And feign wounded outrage, at great length.
Issa is a a**a isn’t he?
Boy, you gave money to all these good things, you’re just such a wonderful person. We won’t talk about that contribution to Mary Landrieu
She just testified a while back that she had no idea who the witnesses were. So, how does she know they had performance problems?
if her previous testimony was in fact elicited with an assurance of confidentiality, I think Lurita’s got a legitimate beef.
Issa: I won’t try to rehabilitate you – now – let me get on with your rehabilitation.
dakine01 @ 66
Well if they’re going to keep sputtering and blabbering on about it, I sure wish they’d tell us what they think she lied about.
Davis needs a real political contest next election…
So does Issa..
But maybe, lets keep Burton around, he’s serious comic relief.
Hiflyer @ 68
I think you are right, and when does he spring it?
Lets subpoena Nixon and ask him about Checkers!
“We are each loyal Republicans… we’ve donated to the United Nigro (his pronunciation not mine) College Fund… we want to make the world a better place”. We need a lighting strike like happend to Ghoulilani the other night. Godamn.
kdh22 @ 59
The Repubs learned their lessons well from Watergate to Iran-Contra. They all have had ample coaching and ample time for preparation. The witness merely lies, stalls, preveracates and the Republicans on the committee provide all the cover they need. The Democrats never seem to have a killer instinct. They are willing to play nice with their “esteemed colleagues” on the other side of the aisle. Their in lies their problem.
Issa going through Doans list of giving. She can sure say “yes” clearly when they are building up “yes” “yes” “yes”.
Too bad she is not that clear when questions are coming from the other side.
I have not heard one Republican ask her serious questions. Not one!
LS @ 64
They say she has changed her story between what she said to SSCI in 2004 and what she said before Waxman in March.
Tierney: You didn’t want to speculate but you did speculate.
Ms. Doan, is it true that you onced saved a bus full of puppies from plunging off of a cliff while on your way to a GOP fundraiser?
-GSD
spurious @ 73
That is the price that you pay when you give more time. You also give your opponent more time. But they have nothing.
The Republicans are giving a demonstration why they are incapable of accountability and accepting responsibility for anything.
They have been and remain active participants in the criminal enterprise that is the Bush Administration. What we are seeing is crooks defending crooks.
JEP @ 77
Davis is going to have a real contest–he’s probably running for Senate in VA, probably against Mark Warner.
It appears that Darrell Issa was (is?) a thug. No wonder he is a Republican.
In 1971, Issa allegedly stole a Dodge sedan from an Army post near Pittsburgh. The allegation has made by a retired Army sergeant, and published in a 1998 newspaper article. Issa denied the allegation. No charges were filed.[2][3]
In 1972, Issa and his brother allegedly stole a red Maserati sports car from a car dealership in Cleveland. He and his brother were indicted for car theft, but the case was dropped.[2][3]
Also in 1972, Issa was convicted in Michigan for possession of an unregistered gun. He received three months probation and paid a $204 fine.[4][5]
On December 28, 1979, Issa and his brother allegedly faked the theft of Issa’s Mercedes Benz sedan. Issa and his brother were charged for felony auto-theft, but the case was dropped by prosecutors for lack of evidence. Later, Issa and his brother were charged for misdemeanors, but that case was not pursued by prosecutors. Issa accused his brother of stealing the car, and said that the experience with his brother was the reason he went into the car alarm business.[2][3]
In 1982, Issa allegedly used deception to take control of Directed Electronics Inc. (then named A.C. Custom) from a former business partner, Joseph Adkins. Adkins borrowed $60,000 from Issa with Adkins’ company stock serving as collateral. Issa made a verbal agreement to give Adkins extra time to repay. However, Issa later obtained a court order to seize the stock despite the verbal agreement, a move Adkins describes as cheating him out of the company and Issa calls the only chance to protect his loan collateral.[4]
A day after the court order, Issa allegedly carried a cardboard box containing a handgun into the office of an A.C. Custom executive, Jack Frantz, and told Frantz he was fired. In a 1998 newspaper article, Frantz said Issa had invited him to hold the gun and claimed extensive knowledge of guns and explosives from his Army service. In response, Issa said, “Shots were never fired. … I don’t recall having a gun. I really don’t. I don’t think I ever pulled a gun on anyone in my life.”[5]
Hiflyer @ 68. BINGO. This is a bad deflection even for this lot.
She’s been coached, and Tierney won’t take it, he is demanding truth, not obfuscation.
Tierney is NOT letting her go into BS mode. Being a MAsshole has it’sd good points sometimes.
He HAS called her on her exact language used about saying things would be done for the future.
She’s back on context and he ain’t putting up with it.
Mandrake @ 77
I’d like Waxman to turn to them and tell them that if they are going to make such accusations, they need to back it up with an explanation of what they are referring to right now, since they insist on bringing it up in this hearing.
Devil’s Advocate @ 90
Issa may very well be my ex-husband! Yikes!
Those Republicans hate victims until they claim to be one.
-GSD
emptywheel @ 84
I see. Did she?
jayt @ 77
I agree about the “assurance of confidentiality”! But I have not heard one Republican ask a serious and substantive question about her actions. That does not look good for the Republicans.
Wax supporting Tierney and didn’t let Davis try to obfuscate. Tierney back saying this report states you were looking to future retaliation…
CONTEXT, blah, blah, blah, CONTEXT, blah, blah, CONTEXT
Davis: allow her to answer the question by saying that everything she said was taken out of context.
Waxman: Stop running out the clock with your blubberings.
D: we’re still in the area of suppostion and conjecture in my mind. OSC report is riddled with errors and mis-statements of fact
JEP at #78
No thanks, we in Indiana don’t need any more comic relief from our congress-critters.
The Electra effect is setting in with the R’s again, they are all trying to protect poor-victimized partisan Doan.
Watch the RW talkers go after Tierney, as a bully, when its Doan and Goodling who are the bullies!
“I have a problem with tense and personal pronouns.”
Doan was an English major in college.
Wow, these threads are flying by so fast!
Has anyone ever followed up a Repub saying “when we investigated we had proof…” with something like “if the WH, OVP, DOJ, RNC, ad nauseum, would stop obstructing justice, we’d have proof!”
dakine01 @ 101
If anyone should know about errors and misstatements of facts it’s Davis.
Doan is trying to disavow her direct statement ot the SOC inquiry! THAT’S chutzpah!
chigail @ 103
It was snark, but I understand your consternation, Burton’s a clown in wolf’s clothing.
Get ready for more spewing “righteous indignation” from Pubes after Tierney raised his voice to get her to answer a question.
Context: It was a bright sunny day and those little flowers that I like so much. You know the little yellow ones or maybe they’re blue, anyway your 5 minutes are up.
emptywheel @ 104
LOL!! LOL!!
emptywheel @ 104
*spew* Bwah-ha-ha-ha!
LS @ 95
And quote an objective source.
Doan, the “defender” of GAO employees?
Lets get some of those employees up for an interview.
Her threats to her underlings were, no doubt, safely veiled.
Davis: this is just a wild goose chase in other words?
Now Mica stroking softly…
Did she really go nine hours straight? Are these nine hours without breaks?
I think the question should be:
Are the employees that have bad reviews the only one’s who testified against her? Did employees with good reviews testify against her?
Mica spews idiocy as he spews idiocy…
Mandrake @ 112
Says so much for Vassar! Ouch
My previous answers don’t count because I was asked to speculate. My previous answers don’t count because I was asked leading questions. My previous answers don’t count because I have a tense problem. — Doan
Were the employees that testified against her considered “liberals”?
The Republicans use a strategy of governance that was first used by the NSDAP in Germany of the 30’s. It was known as “working toward the Fuhrer”. Party functionaries did not require orders from above to carry out Party ideology and policies. They were expected to act on their own. Those that showed initiative were rewarded with more power, prestige and priviledge. The Republicans use the same strategy of governance. All of their actions are done to promote Party interests. In a sense they are “working toward Karl Rove’s” vision of the United States.
noen @ 88
But mucho chutzpah, and plenteous hot air.
The Republicans on this committee have a collective IQ of 14.
Yeah, right, leaks are bad, so what about Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and what they did to Valerie Plame?
HYPOCRITES!!!
I’m coming to this late, but she looks like she’s running the show.
Could she have been playing dumb the first time around?
emptywheel @ 104
note to self: swallow the coffee before starting to read emptywheel’s comments.
OSC has not admitted to leaking it (though it’s clear either they or the Inspector General did). That is the second-to-last draft, which doesn’t name the employees.
But the final report, OSC was clear, Doan’s own office leaked.
Bluetoe @ 122
Without a doubt.
BlueToe @ 82:
Henry et al. ought to request that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse come over and conduct a little “this is how it’s done” seminar for Democratic House Committee members!
LS @ 122
Does a bear poop in the woods?
Hugh @ 124
There are 30 of them on the Committee?
dakine01 @ 119
Yes but he seems a sad character. He does not have the capacity to think.
sorta OT – I hope this hearing keeps going for a while – I’ve gotten two new cases so far this morning during the course of this testimony. Can we keep her up all day please?
Hey! Just got here.
It seems to me she’s tring to answer before the question is asked.
I don’t know how much of this I can take!
Note to self: Felonies aren’t felonies when they are committed by Republicans.
Hugh @ 123
Maybe so, but has anything substantive come out of this hearing so far?
A motivational speech? How to better elect, and campaign for, Republicans on office time?
Noonan @ 132
maybe hugh is trying to be generous.
Hugh @ 125
Hey, lets not be mean, that is their average IQ, not a colllective IQ..
“Motivational speech” is no different than a powerpoint presentation, if it promotes partisanship.
Poor minority woman!
“I thought we were going to have a “motivational” speech”. D’ya think???? D’oh….
Wow, now that Mica is questioning, look how nice and brief her answers are.
whoa. Mica has said the following twice: ‘you never saw the presentation ahead of time.’ I think that’s wrong. Jennings sent a copy of the presentation over days (?) ahead of time.
Mica is patronizing her by giving her free advice.
Lie!!!
Did Mica push this hard for an investigation of the Plame outing? Did he push this hard for all of those involved in her outing be held accountable? That would be consistent and honorable.
I would assume due to Mica’s line of comments and questioning that he must be consitent and honorable and was able to rise above party politics and consider the leak of Plames outing fairly and seriously!
“thought you were spooked, but you creamed them” Icky
“Varied quite a bit”
The variations are: what can we do to help our candidates; what can GSA do to help our candidates; what can we do to help; (I’m missing one, but those are the great variations English major Lurita Doan was talking about).
Mica just told her not to cooperate.
Ms. Doan is a kapo for oppressors of minority rights. She is a gutless and shameless human.
-GSD
Mica: Don’t cooperate with the Dem’s. You go girl!!
Ass-hat. he’s encouraging obstruction.
Diane Watson rocks!
Oh lordie, Diane Watson up. Here we go!!
Ahhhhh….here we go…..!!!!
Ms Watson
Watson: (after listening to Mica tell her to obfuscate) I’ve sat here listening to attacks on chair, our former president. Race has been intejected into this hearing on the Hatch act. Do you feel that you are being attacked as a woman and a black?
D: It’s political
W: yes or no
D; No
(Watson is a black woman smacking down Mica, Issa, Davis, et al)
Doan;
yak yak yak..
Hugh @ 136
That was handed down to modern day Republics by Saint Nixon.
Fresh liveblog thread for everyone.
Mica: Did you ever retaliate against “these” employees? Then he corrected himself and said, “Did you ever retaliate against “any” employees?
She previously said she didn’t know who “these” employees who testified were.
Oh, this is nice, Diane Watson. Yes or no, are you being attacked because you’re an African American woman.
YeeHaw!!!! Ms Watson…..
ohh, I’ll have to send her ’something’!
spurious @ 131
Not if it’s a polar bear.
Are we keeping a “I don’t recall” total today?
Bluetoe @ 122
Good point! I think there was a lot of this going on.
That said, I also think that Rove and Cheney are control freaks, and couldn’t resist getting their hands on things.
Bob in HI
Arca @ 136
We are seeing that Lurita Doan can’t give a straight answer to save her life. We see that the Republicans are mindless hacks. It isn’t the substance but the lack of it on the Republican side that is the real story here.
Watson cutting through Doan’s slime!
LS @ 149
Isn’t that illegal?
Whenever she wants backup she looks at the Republicans on the committee for help.
yellowdogD @ 162
A lost polar bear.
selective memory?
Davis sure plays loose and free with interrupting the process…
And Doan knows exactly who her detractors are.
DiFi: AZ. Provisional ballots can’t be cast without ID. Schlozman testified he didn’t have anything to do with drafting. Did you draft the letter?
Spak: I did. My recommendations.
DiFI: So you drafted a letter in essence saying it voters couldn’t vote using provisional ballots without ID.
Spak: re:ID. You have to understand, it was part of the HAVA thingy. There were other attorneys that discussed these inquiries. We were asked to reconsider opinion. EAC. Manual. Reconsideration.
DiFi: You are a lightening rod for problems inherent to voting problems in America. Why do you think 6 people with whom you worked would write intense letters have very strong things to say. Lawyers generally disagree. But they think you don’t belong on commission.
Spak: I was the fall guy. I was only one of half-dozen counsels working on issues.
Bennet: (Asking all) FEC was troubled agency. Ridden with politics and incompetence. Will you give us your idea of degree of partisanship existing there now, that would prevent you from doing job there if you were all appointed?
More “Clintons did it!”
—–off subject—–
Does anyone know anything about US District Judge Reggie B. Walton’s hearing today regarding Libby going to the slammer?—-
Thanks—-
Noe he’s calling on GOD!
Careful, lightning strikes Republicans at amich higher rate than Dems, either its the golf course thing or the “bad seed” factor…
No, Shays, it’s not an investigation, its an inquisition..
See Ms. Doan on the rack?
Poor little Electra…
My,my @ 173
IIRC the bond hearing is Thursday
Bennet: Nominees have done job (in spite of?) Spakovsky. Thinks everyone (everyone?hello?) should be confirmed. Subcommittee adjourned.
Talk about parsing.
Hortatory subjunctive?
Can anyone take Davis seriously???? Hey buddy, if the hearing is such a waste of time, then move the F on and make that tee time. And don’t let the chamber door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Mandrake @ 112
she really blew it when she started muttering some snarky thing at the end about “subjunctive”.
note to self: extreme arrogance reduces effective IQ….
This is about preventing the committee from undertaking the oversight it is legally bound to do. Telling the truth or being able to prove an allegation seem unnecessary and so, well, gosh, legalistic. Like, do they think we’re supposed to be lawmakers or something? The object seems to be to generate repeatable sound bites.
The obfuscation seems pretty intense, more so than the DOJ hearings. I suspect it’s because they know Doan is the the tip of the proverbial iceberg. There are probably dozens of Doans; she was just arrogant enough to admit what she was doing. Apart from how widespread these corrupt pracitces may be, the worry has to be that they lead directly to KKKarl and his flying monkeys.
Waxman is feckless. He allows the Republicans to prattle on and on making wild allegations and referring to Berger the Clintons etc. The best he can do is make a lame joke.