<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Another Dynamic DOJ Duo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:28:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Janovic</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-758820</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Janovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-758820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another dynamic duo can be found in the ongoing “Hookergate”: Joe Clark and Maria Cuvillon, the postal investigators who obtained a warrant to enter Palfrey’s Vallejo home back on October 3rd of 2006 fit a similar mould. According to Deborah Jeane Palfrey and her retired mother (visited by IRS agent Tony Burrows and Cuvillon earlier this month), Clark and Cuvillon are in their late-twenties in appearance and demeanour. Do they have any evangelical-background like Monica Goodling? It’s a worthy question. These could all be appointments by the Bush administration, but it’s unclear at this time. And why was Cuvillon in Florida and Vallejo, California at such disparate-times with an IRS agent? Is it simply to firm-up the federalization of the case? And does anyone want Joe Clark’s home number? ;0)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another dynamic duo can be found in the ongoing “Hookergate”: Joe Clark and Maria Cuvillon, the postal investigators who obtained a warrant to enter Palfrey’s Vallejo home back on October 3rd of 2006 fit a similar mould. According to Deborah Jeane Palfrey and her retired mother (visited by IRS agent Tony Burrows and Cuvillon earlier this month), Clark and Cuvillon are in their late-twenties in appearance and demeanour. Do they have any evangelical-background like Monica Goodling? It’s a worthy question. These could all be appointments by the Bush administration, but it’s unclear at this time. And why was Cuvillon in Florida and Vallejo, California at such disparate-times with an IRS agent? Is it simply to firm-up the federalization of the case? And does anyone want Joe Clark’s home number? ;0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darclay</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757560</link>
		<dc:creator>darclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757560</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So of the dynamic duo, who is Robin? I say the one closest to the floor slithering around must be…Gonzo.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So of the dynamic duo, who is Robin? I say the one closest to the floor slithering around must be…Gonzo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757461</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-756940&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dakine01 @ 63&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;OT, Red Sox 2 Rockies 1, Wakefield goes eight for the win, Papelbon pitches 1-2-3 ninth for the save…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BoSox????? FTFY!!!!!!!!! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BoSox ain’t been squat since Teddy Ballgame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Course, I DID like Yaz.&lt;br /&gt;
N a few others.&lt;br /&gt;
Manny’ kewl.&lt;br /&gt;
Pedro was kewl in BoSox Uni’s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GO A’s!!!!!! N we got better SURF, too . .&lt;br /&gt;
East Coast blows . . . ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-756940"><em>dakine01 @ 63</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>OT, Red Sox 2 Rockies 1, Wakefield goes eight for the win, Papelbon pitches 1-2-3 ninth for the save…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>BoSox????? FTFY!!!!!!!!! </p>
<p>BoSox ain’t been squat since Teddy Ballgame.</p>
<p>Course, I DID like Yaz.<br />
N a few others.<br />
Manny’ kewl.<br />
Pedro was kewl in BoSox Uni’s.</p>
<p>GO A’s!!!!!! N we got better SURF, too . .<br />
East Coast blows . . . ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757457</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-756929&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Loo Hoo. @ 52&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-756917&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eli @ 41&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, Obnoxious Brooklyn Queens Guy is a plus.  I’m thinking more about the DSCC’s lukewarm support for Lamont, plus an overall impression that he’s a member of the “money party” rather than the “people party”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has any reporter checked back with the DSCC to see if they regret not having supported Lamont with everything they had?  They need to eat some crow before they get another dime from me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are we NOT at the point, where NO ONE gets our scheckels and dimes???? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STIFFEN UP FOR GOD’S SAKE and stop sending ANY of the monkey’s free banana slugs!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My god, does ANYONE have a clue what is at stake here, with the loss of the Republic to moneyed interests as described, for oh, some 40 years now!?!?!?!?!?!?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DON’T FEED THE MONKEY’S!!!!!!!! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geez, for an informed erectorate, even THESE FDL readers seem a bit, um, prostate. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GET A CLUE!!!! Don’t support the facists. Don’t feed the wall street monkeys and don’t support elected and elected to be politicians who are beholden to greed and money . . . . &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is that too hard, or too hippie, to wrap all yer liberal lips around, FDL????? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For cryin out loud, FDL, you have POINTED up the legal issues and raisons du jour for a lost Republic . . .  when will you FDL’ers and you FDL pups finally stand up and PEE on the current sign post of our lives? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lift yer legs and PEE on it, fer cryin out loud . . .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(damn for this bellyachin rhetoric of mine but SHOW me a caring citizenry beyond the rhetorical bullshit).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SHOW ME!!!!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harumph.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-756929"><em>Loo Hoo. @ 52</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-756917"><em>Eli @ 41</em></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>No, Obnoxious Brooklyn Queens Guy is a plus.  I’m thinking more about the DSCC’s lukewarm support for Lamont, plus an overall impression that he’s a member of the “money party” rather than the “people party”.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Has any reporter checked back with the DSCC to see if they regret not having supported Lamont with everything they had?  They need to eat some crow before they get another dime from me.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Are we NOT at the point, where NO ONE gets our scheckels and dimes???? </p>
<p>STIFFEN UP FOR GOD’S SAKE and stop sending ANY of the monkey’s free banana slugs!!!</p>
<p>My god, does ANYONE have a clue what is at stake here, with the loss of the Republic to moneyed interests as described, for oh, some 40 years now!?!?!?!?!?!?</p>
<p>DON’T FEED THE MONKEY’S!!!!!!!! </p>
<p>Geez, for an informed erectorate, even THESE FDL readers seem a bit, um, prostate. </p>
<p>GET A CLUE!!!! Don’t support the facists. Don’t feed the wall street monkeys and don’t support elected and elected to be politicians who are beholden to greed and money . . . . </p>
<p>Is that too hard, or too hippie, to wrap all yer liberal lips around, FDL????? </p>
<p>For cryin out loud, FDL, you have POINTED up the legal issues and raisons du jour for a lost Republic . . .  when will you FDL’ers and you FDL pups finally stand up and PEE on the current sign post of our lives? </p>
<p>Lift yer legs and PEE on it, fer cryin out loud . . .</p>
<p>(damn for this bellyachin rhetoric of mine but SHOW me a caring citizenry beyond the rhetorical bullshit).</p>
<p>SHOW ME!!!!  </p>
<p>Harumph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757441</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-756922&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dakine01 @ 46&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; , . . . .&lt;br /&gt;
With DiFi and Schumer on this committee AND Judiciary, Ol’ Hans is gonna be sitting a few inches shorter when they get through with him…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hans is a shill, and he’s the architect of stolen erections past  . . . I hope they geld him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-756922"><em>dakine01 @ 46</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p> , . . . .<br />
With DiFi and Schumer on this committee AND Judiciary, Ol’ Hans is gonna be sitting a few inches shorter when they get through with him…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hans is a shill, and he’s the architect of stolen erections past  . . . I hope they geld him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757439</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-756919&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Marion in Savannah @ 43&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; . . . .   Just make sure you don’t come in the summer, which is brutal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah, see Sacto, CA for same . . . with or WITHOUT the racism and rednecks . . . . &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the SF/Bay Area Migrations HAVE infused culture, gay culture and in general, more intelligent people into here than we found in ‘88 when first moved here . . &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our goal is Tacoma, WA . . . blue, free, and clean air with NO 100F issues!!! (GRIN)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also a quick hop to Canada, and an out if we need it when Boy King pulls the wrong finger.&lt;br /&gt;
(/fart)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-756919"><em>Marion in Savannah @ 43</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p> . . . .   Just make sure you don’t come in the summer, which is brutal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, see Sacto, CA for same . . . with or WITHOUT the racism and rednecks . . . . </p>
<p>Although the SF/Bay Area Migrations HAVE infused culture, gay culture and in general, more intelligent people into here than we found in ‘88 when first moved here . . </p>
<p>Our goal is Tacoma, WA . . . blue, free, and clean air with NO 100F issues!!! (GRIN)</p>
<p>Also a quick hop to Canada, and an out if we need it when Boy King pulls the wrong finger.<br />
(/fart)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757433</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757433</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-756911&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;dmac @ 35&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;i’m on dial-up so don’t always do the links=&lt;br /&gt;
so, don’t know if you included this one, a must-read posted by someone earlier today-h/t to whomever you are….about hans von spakovsky, written by doj employees laying out what all he did that was so wrong while in doj, letter was sent to fienstein i think….i was floored.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/press-2667.html&quot;&gt;http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/press-2667.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good linky poo, thanks so much for that.&lt;br /&gt;
Dude’s a SPAZ to be erected for a Fed Erection Position . . . . Harumph.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-756911"><em>dmac @ 35</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>i’m on dial-up so don’t always do the links=<br />
so, don’t know if you included this one, a must-read posted by someone earlier today-h/t to whomever you are….about hans von spakovsky, written by doj employees laying out what all he did that was so wrong while in doj, letter was sent to fienstein i think….i was floored.<a href="http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/press-2667.html">http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/press-2667.html</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Good linky poo, thanks so much for that.<br />
Dude’s a SPAZ to be erected for a Fed Erection Position . . . . Harumph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTuttle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757197</link>
		<dc:creator>CTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-757194&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rayne @ 184&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-757175&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CTuttle @ 183&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Whew, I’m well aware of what you’re saying, and, I’m well versed in Hawaiian, everything you’ve stated is accurate, need we prolong this?  *g*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CT, I have no idea what your background is.  And it’s for the benefit of a couple other folks who were also reading.  &lt;i&gt;A hui hou.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Hui Hou, Kakou!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-757194"><em>Rayne @ 184</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-757175"><em>CTuttle @ 183</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Whew, I’m well aware of what you’re saying, and, I’m well versed in Hawaiian, everything you’ve stated is accurate, need we prolong this?  *g*</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CT, I have no idea what your background is.  And it’s for the benefit of a couple other folks who were also reading.  <i>A hui hou.</i></p>
</blockquote>
<p>A Hui Hou, Kakou!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757194</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-757175&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CTuttle @ 183&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-757138&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rayne @ 182&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agh.  I should have also said that &lt;i&gt;ka’ama aina&lt;/i&gt; means person or child of the land (&lt;i&gt;aina&lt;/i&gt;); using this phrase to indicate residency status is not supported by the Hawaiian community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And use of the word &lt;i&gt;kanaka&lt;/i&gt; should also be careful and judicious as it was misused by whites referring to male field hands much as “boy” was misused in reference to African-American males.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whew, I’m well aware of what you’re saying, and, I’m well versed in Hawaiian, everything you’ve stated is accurate, need we prolong this?  *g*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CT, I have no idea what your background is.  And it’s for the benefit of a couple other folks who were also reading.  &lt;i&gt;A hui hou.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-757175"><em>CTuttle @ 183</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-757138"><em>Rayne @ 182</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Agh.  I should have also said that <i>ka’ama aina</i> means person or child of the land (<i>aina</i>); using this phrase to indicate residency status is not supported by the Hawaiian community.</p>
<p>And use of the word <i>kanaka</i> should also be careful and judicious as it was misused by whites referring to male field hands much as “boy” was misused in reference to African-American males.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whew, I’m well aware of what you’re saying, and, I’m well versed in Hawaiian, everything you’ve stated is accurate, need we prolong this?  *g*</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CT, I have no idea what your background is.  And it’s for the benefit of a couple other folks who were also reading.  <i>A hui hou.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTuttle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757175</link>
		<dc:creator>CTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/12/yet-another-dynamic-doj-duo/#comment-757175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-757138&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rayne @ 182&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agh.  I should have also said that &lt;i&gt;ka’ama aina&lt;/i&gt; means person or child of the land (&lt;i&gt;aina&lt;/i&gt;); using this phrase to indicate residency status is not supported by the Hawaiian community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And use of the word &lt;i&gt;kanaka&lt;/i&gt; should also be careful and judicious as it was misused by whites referring to male field hands much as “boy” was misused in reference to African-American males.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whew, I’m well aware of what you’re saying, and, I’m well versed in Hawaiian, everything you’ve stated is accurate, need we prolong this?  *g*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-757138"><em>Rayne @ 182</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Agh.  I should have also said that <i>ka’ama aina</i> means person or child of the land (<i>aina</i>); using this phrase to indicate residency status is not supported by the Hawaiian community.</p>
<p>And use of the word <i>kanaka</i> should also be careful and judicious as it was misused by whites referring to male field hands much as “boy” was misused in reference to African-American males.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whew, I’m well aware of what you’re saying, and, I’m well versed in Hawaiian, everything you’ve stated is accurate, need we prolong this?  *g*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
