Glenn Greenwald has a superb essay today on the Beltway punditocracy and political classes, like Joe Klein and his smarmy defense of multiple-felony convicted Scooter Libby, who have enabled the Bush Administration to utterly disregard the rule of law for the last six plus years. From Glenn:
The reason Bush officials have believed they can simply break the law with complete impunity is because the Beltway culture in which they operate believes that. Most importantly, our media stars absolutely believe that, that lawbreaking by the most powerful political officials who rule their world is not real lawbreaking, even when they are convicted in a court of law — after ample due process and with the best legal defense team which Marty Peretz and Fred Thompson could help pay for — of committing multiple felonies.There are many reasons why the political press fails to investigate and uncover real wrongdoing on the part of the government, but a leading reason is that they do not see lawbreaking as genuinely wrong or the lawbreakers as corrupt. These are their friends and colleagues — their socioeconomic peers and, with increasing and disturbing frequency, their spouses and family memebers — and while Important Bush Officials might be “guilty” of engaging in harmless and perfectly accepted political “hardball,” they are never genuinely bad people engaged in genuinely bad acts. And they certainly do not belong in criminal courtrooms or prison.
It is so painfully revealing, though equally unsurprising, to read one of our most prestigious pundits, the Leading Liberal in Time Magazine, argue that Paris Hilton should be imprisoned as an example of the stern rule of law that prevails in our country but convicted felon Lewis Libby — who deliberately lied under oath to the Grand Jury and as part of an FBI investigation — should be set free. Or that George Bush’s spying on Americans in violation of the criminal law is a matter of mere political controversy which Democrats ought steadfastly to avoid. There is no class of people more defensive of the prerogatives of political power than our “journalist” class, even though, in a healthy and functioning democracy, the exact opposite would be true.
Good on Glenn. Nowhere has this “the rules oughtn’t apply to our kind” mentality been more stunningly displayed than the WaPo editorial pages, wherein David Broder held forth yesterday with an op-ed so devoid of factual understanding of the underlying issues in the case, I’m not even going to bother to quote from it. That it appeared in the same section with Carol Leonnig’s piece speaks volumes about the disconnect between the punditocracy and their lack of commitment to the rule of law — versus the Rule of Bush. Perhaps The Dean ought to talk with reporters who actually spent time at the courthouse covering the trial in meticulous detail…but then, that would require an open mind and not one that was already made up for him, now wouldn’t it?
We have a chance today to help draw a stark contrast between those folks who take their oath to uphold the Constitution seriously — and those who want to uphold their tenuous grasp on the power wheel through an ever-fading commitment to the rule of Bush. Please take some time today and call you Senators and tell them to vote for the resolution of no confidence in Alberto Gonzales.
Emptywheel sent me the following list of GOP Senators whose support has been very, very soft for Gonzales or who have called outright for him to resign:
- Coleman (has called for AGAG’s resignation)
- Hagel
- McCain
- Roberts (ha! though he has called for AGAG’s resignation)
- Sununu
- Smith
- Sessions
- Graham
- Specter (ha! will probably be voting “Scottish Haggis” again)
- Bond
- Grassley
- Snowe
- Collins
- Ensign
You can phone, toll free through the Capitol switchboard, at the following numbers. Let’s make all of our Senators go on the record: do you support the Constitution and the rule of law? Or do you stand only for the Rule of Bush?
1 (800) 828 – 0498
1 (800) 459 – 1887
1 (800) 614 – 2803
1 (866) 340 – 9281
1 (866) 338 – 1015
1 (877) 851 – 6437
(H/T to reader katymine for compiling these.) RawStory has more on the expectations at the moment — let’s see if we can move the numbers a bit.
(Gorgeous American flag shot via Thomas Hawk.)



109 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Zed!!
Double Gitmo!!
Triple?
It’s gonna be a home run … I don’t believe what I just saw!!!!!
I hate dial-up. This is the closest I’ve gotten in a while.
Christy, your fingers are on fire this morning!
:)
Novak complains about support for Gonzo but none for Scooter: Link
And speaking of the rule of law:
twolf1 @ 41
I forget, who committed treason: Paris or Scooter?
Christy,
I think I’ll call some other state sens.
Here (MA), it’s preaching to the choir.
This AM, Dubya said he doesn’t care what the Senate does.
I still think impeachment should be considered.
Graham’s office hasn’t rec’d many calls per staff.
Tony Auth cartoon on Libby
I keep trying Warner and Webb, but both lines are busy. I hope that’s a good sign.
egregious @ 8
I don’t know. With this administration’s loose definitions, a reasonable amount of time might be when hell freezes over.
The Wikipedia on al-Marri looks good … sorry, I don’t know how to do links yet.
He has a brother in Guantanamo. This al-Marri, Padilla, and Hamdi are the 3 “enemy combatants” in/on the continental U.S.
This looks significant.
Mornin’ Christy and all!
I don’t know how the Onion does it, to take the absurd and make it more so.
“irrelevant”
Gen. Washington: “we are a nation of laws, not men…”
WH: “GW is increasingly irrelevant”
Rule of law indeed!!
One of the things I find most frustrating in the coverage of the Gonzales investigations and no-confidence vote is the number of reporters who parrot the Republican talking point of “well, it doesn’t matter because he’s not going anywhere as long as the president supports him.” It’s bad enough that news anchors don’t know that Gonzales can be impeached, but most of these reports are coming from people who are supposedly the “Congressional correspondent” or “Capitol Hill correspondent.” I used to think these guys had a bit of a clue, but apparently they don’t know anything about Congress except what congressional staffers tell them.
from AP:
will someone please tell president bush that it is his administration, and our goverment?
hi all
christy I sent an emai to the firedog addres, did you get that?
selise @ 18
no, mo one will tell him that
Redshift @ 17
You’ll find better coverage here:
abu recovers from amnesia
;)
from marty lederman at balkinization on, “al Marri — Big News From the Fourth Circuit“:
This just in: White House press release titled President Bush participates in roundtable on free market democracy.
Free market democracy – you know – democracy to the highest bidder.
WRT the list of Senators whose support for Gonzales has been weak, when I called Sen. Roberts’ office earlier today, his staff was unaware that the vote was scheduled for today.
Needless to say, I don’t think Roberts intends to vote for it, if he even shows up, unless significant pressure is put on him. Fellow Kansans, give his office a call.
i guess we dont understand that bushco is all powerful and all-knowing and citizens dont count for shit in his “government” and the sooner we realize it the better we’ll all be….. no impeachment hearings for a fool who’s running amok…. god how frustrating it has become
Great essay Glenn and to Christy too.
To thew journos, WRT the line “….pleasure of the president”, where is it so written?
“Pleasure of the President” is a quaint custom from what I have heard, rather than any formal aspect of our form of government. Seriously.
Oh … and (says Bush on Rawstory) the “immigration bill will pass” once Bush gets back home and visits Capitol hill??? WTF??
Must. Learn. To. Link.
I haven’t had a chance to read the whole Greenwald post yet, but it goes to the heart of the matter. I think the drift began under Reagan, who owing to his ’star’ quality and that of his wife engendered a Court system that was validated by Bush-I’s Contra pardons. It also explains in part the truly visceral hatred that ‘establishment’ had for the Clinton’s. It was just the Arkansas origins. Clinton brought in the best and brightest of my generation to work in government — people who got there by merit, not by nepotism. That system, which would have given us a real senior appointed Civil Service had Gore won, has been deliberately and systematically destroyed by the Bush administration, with the connivance of a Washington Punditocracy that, being close to the scene, knows what is going on, and so must be assenting to it.
Money talks, and when a Congressional staffer can go immediately (or almost immediately) to a lobbying firm for $400,000, it sets the tone for just about everyone else in the middle to upper-middle professional class.
This is why we need a truly populist revolt. The originbal one was for economic justice. At this point, I’d be happy for plain vanilla justice –you know, the kind we used to take for granted.
RawStory says Dems don’t expect enough votes for cloture. My humble suggestion for the Dems: If you lose that vote, just let them filibuster. If Republican Senators want to be on TV 24/7 chatting about how great Abu Gonzales is, I say let them have it. I don’t understand why the filibuster bluff isn’t called more often.
oh yeah – BTW – when does libby check into his cell?? or will he ever…..its just one huge joke thats being played on us – common criminals – cell cant close fast enough – powerful lawbreakers – ehhh – must be pardoned – its disgusting – i for one am sick of this dance
Frank Probst @ 30
i’d love to see that… at least make ‘em go for a day or two.
Frank Probst @ 30
yeah anyway.
Can somebody please explain to me why it is that the republicans can filibuster a symbolic vote of “no confidence,” while democrats were unable to filibuster Alito?
jayackroyd @ 34
um, stones.
juslin @ 31
my impression was that it was 45 days from the sentencing. so he’s still got a while.
juslin @ 31
I believe we will know on Thursday after the hearing
Mutant Poodle @ 35
Unfortunately, true…
Frank Probst @ 30
I am a moron about parlimentary procedure, but I think that they can talk about any old thing they want – not necessarily the issue at hand.
man i go away for a few days – get home and its as if i never left – SOS – it still stinks…..
IIRC, wingnut Senator Coburn of OK also called on Gonzales to resign. Memorable because he so rarely does anything right. Or has he recanted?
MayDaze @ 41
in his own sweet way
Can somebody please explain to me why it is that the republicans can filibuster a symbolic vote of “no confidence,” while democrats were unable to filibuster Alito?
Uh, the democrats are too weak even when they have a majority but still cannot override a veto? Not to mention they are just as much in the corporate payola as the republicans and the less that gets done the longer the bucks still come.
And face it, the republicans are sure as hell aren’t afraid to kick people in the balls and dare them to do something about it. They will just take their money and yours and go home. They know that no one will do anything to them. That happened to slick dick nick and it will happen no more.
i realize the dems have a slim majority but if the repugs threaten to filibuster – i say let them dont cave in to their demands call their bluff – i agree with frankprobst@ 30 for real… i need my lunch now before i get too upset so i can take meds – back later
Sen. Bond, R-MO’s office said that Bond had no statement about the vote. Guess he is over at the WH getting his rubber stamp inked!
Lanny Davis? Ron Brown? Madeline (”It’s WORTH it even if 100,000 Iraqi kids starve!”) Albright, Larry Summers? Henry Cisneros? etc…
these were the ‘best & the brightest”?
mebbe not…
@ 44: ‘getting his rubber stamp inked’
How polite of you to put it that way, but I’m sure he’s getting a lot more than that.
Raw Story is reporting from Senate aides that the no-confidence vote will fail. Said it would be straight party voting. Depsite the so called “misgivings” of some Republicans in the end they will close ranks to maintain Party solidarity to protect their own. This notion of peeling away one vote at a time is once again exposed for the sham that it is. This will undoubtebly be spun as a Republican victory anb once again the weakness of the Dems in Congress.
Well, I’ve reached the offices of both my Republic senators and expressed my wish that:
A) They vote FOR the No-confidence resolution on AG Gonzalez and
B) If they cannot see their way to vote No-confidence to help bring the rule of law back to the DoJ, that they vote FOR cloture so that we may have one of their favorite “up or down votes on the merits of the resolution” which they whined about so mightily when the Dems were using filibuster.
Given that my senators are Cornyn and Hutchison, I won’t be holding my breath for this to happen.
When is the Senate vote scheduled?
Elliott @ 33
The rules governing filibuster were changed some thrity or so years ago.
This is from wiki on the topic:
In current practice, Senate Rule 22 permits procedural filibusters, in which actual continuous floor speeches are not required, although the Senate Majority Leader may require an actual traditional filibuster if he or she so chooses. This threat of a filibuster can be just as powerful as an actual filibuster.
Budget bills are governed under special rules called “reconciliation” which do not allow filibusters. Reconciliation once only applied to bills that would reduce the budget deficit, but since 1996 it has been used for all matters related to budget issues.
A filibuster can be defeated by the governing party if they leave the debated issue on the agenda indefinitely, without adding anything else to the agenda. Strom Thurmond’s attempt to filibuster the Civil Rights Act was defeated when Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson refused to refer any further business to the Senate, which required the filibuster to be kept up indefinitely. Instead, the opponents were all given a chance to speak and the matter eventually was forced to a vote.
Why doesn’t Harry Reid bring a confidence-in-Abu vote to the floor, and let the GOP vote for it or abstain? I bet the AYE votes would be in the high teens for a confidence vote.
A no-confidence vote is backwards; it makes the GOP Senators stick up for Abu when they’d rather not. Calling for a confidence vote would allow them to vote NO or abstain.
Never confuse movement with progress.
What the Dem leadership has done so far is movement, little else.
I called Specter’s office, they have no clue what Snarlin’ Arlen is gonna do(Go figure!!). I called Reid’s office and told them that Harry has to muzzle HoJo. I will be calling Casey’s office now.
If the cloture vote today fails as expected I think the House ought to move to impeach. Initially, this vote was seen as a way to measure the level of wagon circling the rethugs would do around gonzo. They’ll circle now because they can say this is a meaningless, symbolic move. Well, then we should move on to a move that is not symbolic, which impeachment and conviction certainly are not! The house will impeach and then let the rethugs circle the wagon over whether or not he really broke the law.
On that same note, I am just sick of hearing shrub say he did nothing wrong. He lied to congress, he obstructed justice, etc etc. Impeach him and then lets have a trial.
The Republicans are willing to use the filibuster that the Democrats were so affraid of using because they might appear obstructionist to the American public. Once again Democrats have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. This is the Party that going to right the ship of state?
Bluetoe @ 48
I called Specter’s office, I forgot to ask what the calls have been like. I hope Specter enjoys his last few years in the Senate. He’ll be out of a job come 2010.
Ed*ard Teller @ 49
mcjoan says that debate is scheduled to start at 4:30 and continue until 5:30, when there will be the cloture vote.
Mutant Poodle @ 35
You have that right. I can’t believe that Reid was ever a boxer. He’s too damn timid. Ugh!!!
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 57
Your conclusion overestimates the intelligence of the American public.
My report from Iowa and Grassley’s office.
My call to grassley contained the following:
1. My concern about politization in non-partisan positions most notably the most recent revelations about immigration judgeships.
2.The Patriot Act position under which an Iowan was appointed(Matt Dummermuth,33, Harvard Law, Civil Rights Divisions, little trial experience(sound familiar?)
3.I noted that he failed to attend the Judiciary Committee’s testimony of Comey and Schlotzman. Was he busy doing other than the people’s business?
ps. I do not think they like hearing from me but I diplomatically remind them that I voted for him and that he works for me!
OT, Congrats to Emptywheel, us Firepups, and Bill Moore at proctoringcongress.com for the writeup in NY Times. WE ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE!
How can congress not support the presidents AG? I just saw the Albanians treating Bush like a rock star on CNN, so he must be the bestest pres ever.
Bluetoe @ 60
There are a lot of people here in PA who will be working to defeat Specter. He’s always gotten by because of weak opponents. That will be different this time.
1,544 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen Hardin Smith and the Firepup Patriots:
Enough a this symbolic bullshit and don’t ask me ta wast my precious time and energy callin’ on fuckin REPUBLICANS??!!…JEEzus keeeRIST what is that about??!!
The only folks we should be callin’ and puttin the heat on is DEMOCRATS for God’s sake! The Democrats’ve gotta stop wastin’ time tryin ta make Kabuki moves in front a the cameras and rescind the war resolution and subpoena all the bastards right down ta the White House janitor.
This is somethin’ out of a bad Sartre play…the Democrats started with 70% support in November ‘06 and now none a the bastards could get elected dog catcher. So don’t pull my chain anymore…good Christ, waste time and energy callin’ REPUBLICANS??!!…somebody got inta my stash a good shit!
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…LOOKS LIKE WE GOTTA KICK SOME MORE DEMOCRATIC BUTT IN ‘08!!
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 57
you expected…what?
of course it’s gonna fail..
NOBODY wants it to succeed…
if it were successful, somebody might ackshully decide they hadda do sumpin boudit…
the Dims DO NOT WANT a constitutional crisis, cuz they’d lose…
all these cretinous fucks are wholly and totally in the thrall of the corpoRatocracy…
real criticism of the preznit ain’t good fer the cunchry; makes folks uneasy, keeps ‘em home, outta da malls…hurts the economy…
chuy, yous guys…
Eureka Springs @ 62
The MSM will play Bush’s trip to Albania for all it’s worth. There is little doubt that they will do what is expected of them to push Bush’s poll numbers upward. By mid summer I predict that his numbers will be in the low 40’s. The Democrats haven’t shown the stomach for bringing down the Administration. They are perfectly satisfied with “hearings” and then have a news conference that they are bringing accountability back to Washington. Oh Please.
TeddySanFran @ 52
Why don’t the dems have someone like you advising them? This is clever.
Republicans support of Gonzo means they really do like brown people.
Joe Klein’s conscience @ 63
Eureka Springs @ 62
Just curious. Did CNN show the reception he got in Italy?
Elliot @ 42 -
Yeah, Coburn’s real big on balancing the budget, until it comes to actually doing something about it like raising taxes. He cast the deciding vote against funding the war by reducing Bush’s tax cuts. Just a lot of posturing for his fellow wingnuts back home.
Solai @ 67
because we have Stuart Rothernberg instead. blergh. (link is to matt stoller’s awesome takedown)
The Senate can’t afford a real filibuster — it would cut into fundraising time and all the Senators would get cranky.
1,544 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen realworld and the Firepup Patriots:
“If the cloture vote today fails as expected, I think the House ought to move to impeach.”
Abso-fuckin-lutely right on! That’s the only way we put the heat on BOTH Republifascists and Democratic whimps, make the folks vote on all the Bush lawlessness and then send ‘em out for re-election!!
We need a change in Democratic leadership in the Senate…let’s pull Joe Likuderman’s seniority, call for an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives and send a rescission of the war authorization to the floor of the Senate.
Time to come out of the closet Democrats!!
KEEP THE FAITH…THE BEST PERSUATION IS A GOOD KICK IN THE ASS!!
Over at Muckraker they are hinting that if this doesnt fly Gonzales has skated. No more hearings.
The Dems dont deserve to be in power.
Kent Conrad speaking on the Gonzo resolution on the senate floor.
realworld @ 55
I’m inclined to agree. If the senate dems don’t have the votes for a no-confidence vote on Gonzo, they’re never going to have enough to find Bush guilty of his manifest crimes. But the house should be able to come up with enough votes to impeach. For our own self-respect as a country, this delusional little dictator must go on record as a president who was impeached.
AZ Matt @ 76
c-span2
Loo Hoo @ 70
Not that I noticed. But I didn’t watch for more than a couple of minutes.
snowbird42 @ 75
well, they’re not, really. just sorta nominally; enough to be able be saddled with the blame for the clusterfuck, but not enough to actually change anything.
i honest to god think the Pukes planned something like this…
anyway…gonzales was never in any real danger of anything except some mild congressional wrist-slapping.
it’s a kind of genius, really, cuz now BOTH the Dims & the Pukes can run against Bush…which vitiates the Dims’ one claim to uniqueness…see, you don’t hafta vote Dim to repudiate the busheviks, cuz the Pukes are just as upset at the abrogation of the (gasp) rule of law…
.
Bush couldn’t even go where he’d planned in Italy — but you don’t hear much about the religious order that had to come to the US Embassy to see Bush, since the Secret Service wouldn’t let the Preznit travel on narrow Roman streets to see them.
This Albanian footage is heavensent for Rove. Expect to see it until your eyeballs bleed.
Oh, and remember the Pelosi headscarf fracas? Now, not so much.
“and while Important Bush Officials might be “guilty” of engaging in harmless and perfectly accepted political “hardball,” they are never genuinely bad people engaged in genuinely bad acts. And they certainly do not belong in criminal courtrooms or prison.”
And I thought republicans did not beleive in moral relativism. I guess if religion has the monopoly on ‘morals’, we should refer to it as “ethical relativism.”
TeddySanFran @ 81
IOKIYAR
Are we seeing the end of democracy as we know it?
You should never play hardballs with justice
Bay State Librul @ 84
I think so, just read Al Gore.But will we go quietly?
Very brief ThinkProgress post: Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA)
He’s voting for the no confidence resolution.
Bay State Librul @ 84
Is it in the Constitution that we the people have to revolt if need be?
Pach’s upstairs talking about Univision’s debate invitation and Hillary’s response: Say What, Now?
Elliott @ 88
Then I’m with Flamethrower …
He makes a lot of sense to me
Spector will vote “a resounding no” confidence:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19165190/
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 87
DING! Let’s hope he starts a trend (seems a a bit likely, given his timidity)
Bit of good news
Doctor Expects Senator Johnson To Resume Duties
Maybe in July
I called Coleman’s DC office this morning and the staff talking point is that Coleman supports Gonzo’s resignation. I pointed out that this was not the same as supporting the no-confiedence resolution and pressed for Coleman to vote no-confidence. The staffer told me that Coleman hadn’t made a statement regarding where he was going to be on this vote. Typical Coleman, his words support his constituents and his vote supports bush. He only votes against bush if he knows it won’t affect the outcome, and if the party says it’s OK.
A staffer from Senator Brownback’s (R-KS) office just hung up on me because I was pressing for answers on his stance on Alberto Gonzales. I am so sick of politics as usual. The aid pretty much told me that he is waiting to see how is collegues vote before he decides. ARRGHHH
perris at 19 — Nope, no e-mail. Did you send it to ReddHedd AT firedoglake DOT com? If so, it’s slow going through the toobz today. Try ReddHedd AT aol DOT com instead.
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 87
Where’s Rape Gurney Joe on this one?
Is anyone still here?
Appeals Court Orders Enemy Combatant Free by Military.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06…..nt.html?hp
The al-Marri cse – court told the army he needs to be released immediately – ahem – issued a writ of habeas corpus!
NorskeFlamethrower @ 74
Amen.
snowbird42 @ 93
Great News!
Hatch spewing forth right now.
Hatch is making me nauseous!
I did not see names of TX Cornyn or Hutchison..I guess they have not noticed that Gonzo is either a diehard, pathological liar or severely brain damaged with no memory function. I guess I hear a little more “birds of a feather” in the background. Cornyn is too busy worrying about all those illegals; Hutchison may be reminiscing about the “modest foreign policy” that she & candidate Bush would support. My heart longs for Molly Ivins.
Quzi @ 102
I have to turn it off!
Why cant the Dems come up with the zinger…the got you.
Just this once
snowbird42 @ 104
Muted also…
…
Could someone who knows what’s happening drop an update here? Thanks.
Maybe we need a confidence vote on the US Constitution — somehow I feel there would be Repubs voting Nay.