Bobby Kennedy was killed on this date back in 1968. The above YouTube of his speech in Indianapolis are words that RFK spoke to a crowd there on the night of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s asassination. There is something about the lilt in Bobby Kennedy's voice, while he speaks words of hope and reconciliation, that has always drawn me to this particular speech of his — and knowing that he gave it extemporaneously makes it all the more poignant and impressive.
Lately, I have been thinking a lot about what passes for leadership in this country these days. There was an op-ed in the GuardianUK several months ago regarding RFK, that had a bit that was particularly sharp:
Nevertheless now, as 40 years ago, the Democrats must navigate the politics of war with both audacity and care. Some New Democrats whose obsession with the centre made Bill Clinton electable, still talk as though the war is almost an irrelevance. Denial like that is catastrophic. But reducing everything to the war could be disastrous too. Remember George McGovern.
That wider understanding was part of what made Kennedy a stronger candidate than McCarthy in 1968. Yet if in 2008 the Democrats find a leader who, faced with the most demanding speech of his life, can summon up the spirit of Ancient Greece "to tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of this world", let us pray that this time he or she will live to attempt the task, not leave this generation to grow old wondering about what might have been.
We live a lot of our lives wondering at the "what might have been" scenarios and potentials, but not nearly enough of our lives in the "what ought to be" aspects.
What was striking yesterday with the Libby sentencing hearing was this from Judge Walton:
"Individuals should understand that when you transgress the law, there are consequences," Walton said. When those in high positions "step over the line," he continued, "it causes people to lose faith in our government."
This could be said to any number of people who hold public office or high political appointment in Washington, D.C., at the moment. That it needed to be said out loud at all is appalling enough. But, striking in its simplicity, Walton cut to the heart of what has been wrong for the last six years: the laws apply to all of us and it is incumbent upon people in public service to understand that they must adhere more faithfully to the spirit and the letter of the law because they ought to both be an example to those they serve and because they must earn the public trust through their actions and deeds.
Throughout the Bush presidency there has either been an orchestrated effort to fail at governing or outright incomptence disguised as inadvertant hackery, or both. And, as Jane rightly pointed out yesterday:
But it does go along way to explaining why the Washington Journal is fueled by the anger of people who believe that the government is never to be trusted or believed. This is a terrible problem, probably one of the greatest that the next President will face. Even as we need to start redeeming government from Grover Norquist's bathtub and begin to have a conversation about what the appropriate role in our lives that government should play, people have been rendered so cynical and so jaded, so thoroughly convinced that those to whom governance has been entrusted like Scooter Libby and his letter writing pals can do nothing right that re-engaging the public at a level necessary to redeem this country from the problems we are going to face will be extremely difficult.
Bad government can be harmful to the public. But good government — resources targeted and used wisely to help those most in need to move forward, to lift up at risk children, to give hope where none existed, to save lives, to protect the nation from threats both domestic and foreign? The list is endless in its potential. That is what government is designed to do at its best.
And it is what the Bush Administration has been doing so very badly for far too long without check or balance.
True leaders stand up as adults and face the consequences of their actions, they learn from their mistakes, and they try to do better once they know better. Bobby Kennedy was far from perfect. But the potential of who he could be, the hope and the renewed energy that he brought to the Presidential race back in 1968 came partly from his flaws: he took them out, looked them over, studied his mistakes carefully and learned the lessons from them — and from those made by others — and strove to find solutions to the very problems in which he had been mired over his lifetime. That is leadership.
If the rogues gallery of letter writers for Scooter is any indication, the Bush Administration's dimmest bulbs and outside props have learned nothing but lessons of cronyism and denial.
What ought to be is that the next generation of leaders in this nation learn from this: no man, no matter how well connected, is above the law. And no loyalty, no matter how true to it you may stay, will save you from prison if your boss has a larger interest in saving himself. There can be no real pardon for Libby because, in the greater context, there is no escape from this hole that he and Dick Cheney have dug for themselves within the larger context of failures and of disrespect for the law of the Bush Administration. Scooter Libby is now, and forever after will be known as, the man who covered for Dick Cheney. And neither he nor Dick Cheney can escape that legacy of shameful manipulation and disrespect for the law.
America is at its best when our leaders strive not to enrich just themselves or their cronies, or to cover their own rearends from public scrutiny, but when they look to the least among us and find a way to lift them up so that we can all move forward together. This is true of our actions at home as well as abroad. We should never be a nation of ever-widening divide and self-dealing cronyism but should, instead, strive to be a nation which holds equality and justice as its guiding principles. A nation which truly works to further "we the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." Because what we do today not only ripples out for all of us — but it will continue to ripple outward for generations to come. It is incumbant upon all of our leaders to understand that their decisions today will be with us for several generations more.
When we lose sight of what ought to be, we lose our way.
Related posts:
- SCOTUS Denies Valerie Plame Wilson Her Day in Court
- The Bush Fairy Tale on the Libby Pardon
- New White House Counsel Bob Bauer and Scooter Libby Justice
- The Taxpayers Paid Dick Cheney’s Personal Defense Attorney to Obstruct Any Inquiries Into His Crimes
- Cheney’s Lawyer Already Leaked the Content of Cheney’s “Privileged” Interview





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

zed?
Morning, Christy.
Mods: You can’t get to this thread through the main page. But only through the link in Scarecrow’s thread.
[Mod: This is normal in the first couple of minutes. The front page has a
mindrefresh schedule of its own. Thanks.]Zed!
So Close!
Bush is suppose to be in control his people take their cue from him about what is and is not a priority apparently the law is not.
I mixed this speech linked with U2’s Please song – I often listen to it over and over. I could deliver this wonderful speech in my sleep.
Very good post Christy. Honesty seems lacking too often from many in leadership positions but we also as citizens need to realize that we have a duty to ask questions and sometimes be prepared for answers or shared sacrifices we don’t always like.
Good morning, Christy, and thank you for something I’ll be thinking about for awhile.
We search for leaders that will implement our dreams for ourselves, our families and the future. At the same time, we are the ones we’ve waited for. I’ve listened to so many people who tell me that they could never run for office. After all, they have too many skeletons in the closet, it costs too much, etcetera. Could be. At the same time, some of those “skeletons in the closet” serve to teach lessons that wouldn’t be available otherwise.
We’re not human unless we make mistakes. I think we become adults as we learn from those mistakes and move forward. The greatest leaders of our generation have not been the ones who were “perfect”. They have been the ones who demonstrated humility and grace under pressure.
-S
Re: Libby:
Timmeh said on the Today Show this morning that Bush will be under a lot of pressure from his “base” (whatever that is these days) to pardon Libby if Walton sends him to prison during his appeal.
I agree with your point. Americas greatest deficit on all levels is in Leadership.
A pity really with all the hope and strong backs we have. What a shame to mislead.
Also, of course, the 63rd anniversary of D-Day.
Y’know I miss Republicans like Dwight Eisenhower who could speak of peace and also without notecards.
If the leaders don’t respect the law then the people will follow the leaders example and the country will be ungovernable. Grover is a nilhist pretending to be a conservative anarchist how did our society breed such a creature?
Wow, I just happened to catch a bit of another US Attorney hearing this morning with the former Missouri USA.
Pat Leahy talked about his time working for the former Attorney General and his unwaivering commitment to political neutrality in prosecutions, even in the case of a lawsuit brought against the President, his brother, JFK.
Christie,
Thank you. I said in a thread over the weekend it was RFK that made me the liberal I am today, and it prompted me to pull out one of my favorite books, a collection of his quotes entitled “Make Gentle the Life of the World”, complied by his son, Maxwell Kennedy.
I was reading it Saturday, and it gave me hope, but it made me cry, too, because where is our leader like that, today?
Mmmm, and Obama is supposed to be the new RFK.
I well remember Gary Hart from the Mc Govern campaign with his cowboy boots and cowboy hat and Bill Clinton running the Texas campaign. ( I ran the New Jeresy campaign for a while). Everyone was full of themselves. But Clinton and Hart especially so and I always felt that these were two institutional guys who viewed the McGovern campaign as a personal opportunity much in the way they both viewed Yale Law School. Both seemed like uninspired opportunists at a time when I expected some real imagination from that campaign. It never came, to say the least. And Hart and Clinton continued on in the same vein.
History would have been different if RFK had lived. He was capable of great personal development unlike Hart and Clinton.
CHS in 2008 !
Biodun @ 8
Tweety needs to be told 30% is not greater than 70% America is not apathetic anymore Bush pardons Scooter and there will be consequences! To bad Tweety does not see the danger that a Bush pardon will do to further polarize the nation.
leftdci9n72, RFK’s ability for personal development, as well as his passion and compassion, are the things about him that fascinate me.
Politics was emotional to him – it caused him to do and say things that made his advisers cringe. And he wasn’t afraid of making that misstep – I love the story of him talking about health care for the poor to a bunch of med students, and they asked who would pay for it, and he replied “you will.”
He wasn’t perfect, but there was an honesty there, an honest emotion and caring and belief in justice, and the need to address injustice, that just makes me wish I’d been born 20 years earlier so I could have campaigned for him.
So Firedoglake won’t be covering the Senate hearings? I thought the MSM pretty much buried it and the WaPo’s story was misleadingly thin.
I was 5 when RFK was killed…..remember my mom showed me a picture of him with his children, and I cried….
leinie – left you a reply downstairs.
MR. Bill @ 20
Yeah, those four liveblogs yesterday and the late nite reblogging of the hearings really just didn’t cut it.
Relax, Mr. Bill, and check out yesterday’s posts.
The loss of Bobby Kennedy was truly a horrible event, and while his loss is deeply felt it’s not necessarily true that he was a stronger candidate in 1968 than Eugene McCarthy. There was always some enmity between the two campaigns, and I think that carries over a bit to today. It remains a fact, though, that Kennedy did not present himself as an ant-war candidate until McCarthy showed it could be done.
There’s no doubt that we could use more leaders like Bobby Kennedy, but we could also use another Eugene McCarthy, who was willing to stand up for what he believed in when no one else would.
I am a great admirer of the Kennedy brothers.
I wonder though if they or any of our former political leaders could maintain their luster under the unrelenting glare of the 24/7 media news networks.
Thank you, Christy. Needed that today.
My girl friend and I did get out the vote for Bobby in Oakland on that June 6, and then came back to watch Bobby’s victory — and his death. I stayed away from politics for a long time after that. Good to remember why he motivated so many of us. Thanks.
That is a great speech from Bobby Kennedy. I missed the Kennedy era by fluke of birth.
I don’t know what the Guardian UK is talking about here though:
I am not disputing. I just think that the war is center stage. I think I am missing something. Has Rahm Emmanuel been saying “let them eat cake” lately?
MR. Bill @ 20
?
There were several posts on this yesterday. We covered it both live and in retrospect, with a couple thousand comments as well.
Morning all — how’s tricks this morning?
ot libby drive-by
guests-guest host susan page, ej dionne georgetown univ,steven moore wsj, norman ornstein aei
discussing libby on npr diane rehm show today…….now discussing william jefferson case……..
talking points, but blantantly stronger, what nerve. valerie had desk job, etc……..
not sure what time they release the show on the website.
sorry no linky, i’m on dial-up……did try to find it twice……
Peterr @ 23
Dude, I love yesterday’s work. I just wanted to see if today’s hearings were getting it.
As posted in a couple of previous threads, the Post coverage was insultingly skimpy, leaving out the good stuff and ending in an anonymous administration quote making the whole thing go away…
MR. Bill @ 31
What hearings?
FYI:
FDL shorthands:
Timmeh —> Tim Russert
Tweety —> Chris Matthews
Biodun @ 9
Sure, Tim, if the “base” = felonious homophobic creationist traitors.
I was at Ft Lewis training to go to Vietnam. I can’t tell you how crazy that day and night was. After King, RFK and the convention in Chicago there was serious doubt in our unit about just who we were supposed to be fighting and for what.
Good morning, Christy. Wonderful post & just the one I needed to read this a.m. RFK greatly admired & missed in this family. To whit:
When RFK died it was a few days before my eldest brother’s high school graduation. He tore up the valedictory approved by the principal’s office in favor of remarks on the death of Bobby Kennedy. Got dressed down for non-approval of speech after the commencement by the principal in front of our parents.
Principal Paizola realized his error immediately as my mother explained her pride in my brother’s speech, utilizing a few unique epithets to make her point…
Biodun @ 33
You left out the interchangeable “Punkinhaid” for Timmeh!
Peterr @ 22
Ditto, leinie.
Christy — thanks for this post, have been thinking about the Kennedy brothers and their impact on our nation since I was in Florida on vacation. I am coming to the conclusion that the reason we are so often painted by the right-wing as disorganized and without solutions is that they do not want us to become as authentically empowered through intellect and reason as the Kennedy brothers were.
Think of the differences between the Kennedys and their sainted Ronnie; it makes me cringe to think we’ve allowed ourselves to be cowed by people who cannot hold a candle to the best we’ve had to offer.
Mandrake:
lol!
allan_in_upstate @ 34
707
Maybe JFK would have gotten us out of Vietnam and maybe he wouldn’t have but he damn sure got us in deep.
raven @ 41
Cuban missile crisis.
He also kept us out of the biggest sh*t the world might ever have seen, up to now.
edit: I think I’m going to barf. No sooner had I typed that bit, I wondered to myself how the current administration would have handled the Cuban missile crisis.
That ought to be a hypothetical put to every Republican candidate: what would you do if you found satellite evidence suggesting WMD being assembled in Cuba…
(Hi Rayne, I really missed your voice yesterday, hope you’re having a good visit with your Mom.)
leinie @ 19
How many politicians would disregard their advisors and give the speech like RFK did in Indianapolis? Not a one, that’s who. Not Edwards, Obama or Clinton. It’s very sad and the nation is poorer for it.
oddmommy @ 21
I was 17 and 14 months away from Vietnam….my initial distrust of “them” had flared when Martin was killed…it was validated during my 21 months in Nam and has kept my compass pointed in the correct direction ever since.
There’s a deep void in me when I think of what might have been and I don’t want my 13 year old daughter or my 11 year old son to have that as a result of the thieving Texas politicos who robbed our legacy in Dallas, Memphis, and LA and who have been enriching themselves and their crews ever since.
Mandrake @ 15
not.
There’s a deep void in me when I think of what might have been and I don’t want my 13 tear old daughter or my 11 year old son to have that as a result of the thieving Texas politicos who robbed our legacy in Dallas, Memphis, and LA and who have been enriching themselves and their crews ever since.
Roger that
Ok, i’m confused..I misunderstood and thought hearings continues today…Apologies..
This is a great thread, Christy.
It does make one think about the possibility of great speech writing and the ideas that make great speeches great, the education and ability to make connections that preclude making a great extemporaneous speech.
Rose Kennedy should be given much credit for making thoughtfulness a main course at dinner.
I have been working through a book on location theory written in the 1940s by an American economist. So long ago. The theory is still good, which is why it pays to revisit the classics, but what stands out is the belief page after page that informed government actions can actually help people. No one knew then or knows now all or even a small part of the answers; but there was a belief that studying facts, organizing them in some rational pattern and thinking about them would get us to a better state. That belief peaked under the Kennedy-Johnson administration.
It is mostly gone now. My profession (economics) is with some important exceptions devoted to the proposition that government stands in the way of a perfect state. I read with horror Phoenix Woman’s report of the conference at the AEI. Kevin Murphy is a good economist; what he says about dictatorships and growth may past muster as ’social science’, but it betrays a mindset that has corroded the moral core of what was once a profession dedicated to finding ways to advance the common good. What we have now is a profession devoted to advancing the proposition that there is no common good that cannot be achieved by private self-interest acting through markets. Government in that view simply impedes its achievement.
The old-timers among us — the Alan Blinders, Uwe Reinhadt’s, George Akerlof, Stigliz, and even Krugman, who is ten years younger — are dinosaurs.
As I said, you have to read some of the work done between 1940 and 1965 to get a sense of what we had, and to read the stuff since 1990 to realize how much we’ve lost.
Projecting history:
Re: Bobby Kennedy:
On MSM a few months ago, a “prominent” historian said Bobby Kennedy getting the nomination (over Humphrey) was not guaranteed. But he offered no evidence. He was speculating. We can always try to project history (like Bush 43) or rewrite history (like “fill in the blank”).
I don’t see how we could even hope for a present-day version of RFK. The Democratic party is engulfed in a kudzu farm of consultants and corporatists, people whose livelihood depends on their ability to talk potential candidates out of saying home truths about our actual situation.
When the standard is “With whom would you most want to have a beer?” we dumb down the choices and end up with George Bush.
It is pathetic that we have lost intellectual acuity as a desirable trait in our president.
Thank you for this post, Christy. It is inspirational and much appreciated.
allan_in_upstate @ 34
Does Pumpkinhead know what he is talking about? Do you think Commander Guy wants Libby hauled before Congress? And remember, he won’t be able to take the 5th if pardoned.
Oh, you so nailed it, Christy!
Throughout the Bush presidency there has either been an orchestrated effort to fail at governing or outright incomptence disguised as inadvertant hackery, or both.
I was 12 y/o watching the coverage of RFK’s speech and watched the shooting occur, I remember that night vividly. The overwhelming sadness of the Kennedy era haunts this country.
MR. Bill @ 48
. . . accepted.
But don’t worry — I’m sure you haven’t heard the last of Leahy, Whitehouse, and the USAttorney firings from Christy and Jane (among others).
As was said on the last thread, watch out for the dangerous women of FDL. (Right, Scarecrow?)
Thank you, Christy. Very well written and I agree wholeheartedly.
Kurt W at 50
What we have now is a profession devoted to advancing the proposition that there is no common good that cannot be achieved by private self-interest acting through markets. Government in that view simply impedes its achievement.
Great summation.
In 1968, it was pretty clear that Kennedy would have taken the nomination, with Johnson and thus Humphrey discredited. That was an awful year, and with Kennedy and Martin Luther King’s assassination, seemed like the country was really doomed.
Somehow we made it, and the ‘might of beens’still make me sad.
masaccio @ 52
You summed it up perfectly. Sad, but true.
Elliott @ 17
seconded!
MR. Bill @ 49
here’s a list with a couple of today’s hearings (and links to all the rest)… they just don’t sound all that interesting to me (although there are four tommorrow i’m going to pay attention to).
i’ve been trying to post a comment in monday’s first thread with the week’s hearing schedule info. hope it helps.
masaccio @ 52
707!
They do seem to spread, don’t they?
MR. Bill @ 20
which hearing? sorry, catching up and 9 threads behind.
MR. Bill @ 60
I try to articulate what it was like, not just King and Kennedy but close friends dying in a useless war, but most folks who weren’t there don’t get it.
As we think about what ought to be and about how to escape from the Bush-Cheney nightmare, we should recognize that what snuffed out the Kennedys is what oppresses us today.
People had a lot of reasons for opposing JFK and RFK, but you have to be a strong believer in coincidence to buy the stories told about their lone assassins. If politicians are gunned down while pursing political aims, it’s fair to assume that their assassinations were political acts. Conspiracy and coverup will remain more likely than not for as long as history remembers the two brothers.
The Kennedys were an active threat to the racist right wing. The outwardly less racist right wing is battling to remain in control of the United States (and the world!) today. We lost more than what ought to be; today we’re saddled with what ought not to be. Just look at ‘em.
Knut Wicksell @ 50
It never hurts to go back to Sam Bowles, Tom Weisskopf, and David Gordon’s works for a little perspective on the social structures of accumulation that underpin the system here either. I really miss David’s writings and his insights.
Howdy, Elliott — yeah, really frustrating yesterday. Good to spend time with my mom, but bad that it had to be yesterday of all days. At least I know how addicted I am to this place…
Knut Wicksell — what really aggravates me about the abandonment of informed government action is that we do actually have informed government. It’s the nature of the information upon which this government acts that is deplorable. They act upon the marketing plans of corporations, using the strategic plans of churches as tools of implementation; they do not use science in any way except in the most diluted fashion through corporate demands.
And this, in a time when communication with and feedback from the entire country on a nearly simultaneous basis is possible for the first time, when computing capacity and capability for modeling complex problems and solutions is possible. Gah.
a LOT of the folks who first considered the phenomena of ‘modernity’ got it right: c wright mills is one of those.
The Power Elite (1956) describes the relationship between the political, military, and economic elite (people at the pinnacles of these three institutions), noting that these people share a common world view, 1) the “military metaphysic”- a military definition of reality, possess 2) “class identity”- recognizing themselves separate and superior to the rest of society, have 3) interchangibility: i.e. they move within and between the three institutional structures and hold interlocking directorates 4) cooptation/socialization: of prospective new members is done based on how well they “clone” themselves socially after such elites. These elites in the “big three” institutional orders have an “uneasy” alliance based upon their “community of interests” driven by the military metaphysic, which has transformed the economy into a ‘permanent war economy’.
50 years ago…i think one of the reasons folks today do NOT read these early critical pioneers is because they were so RIGHT about it, they’ve effectvely been effaced by the very institutions they were criticizing…
.
Peterr @ 57
You know what they say about well-behaved women.
Biodun @ 9
We need to have at least one Dem–someone with some weight, not Kucinich–who will frame the question on Libby as one of treason. Even quoting George Bush I on outing agents as treason would do.
That way, all this set-up the Reps are doing for the Libby pardon won’t be wasted as a 2008 campaign issue, at least.
JFK was very much a center-leaning Democrat who was always concerned about potential trouble on his left flank. The liberals’ hero was Adlai Stevenson, which is why the president appointed him ambassador to the UN, thus keeping him on the inside of the tent pissing out, as LBJ used to say.
Until the last year or two of his life RFK was more toward the center, and even the right, than was his brother. He was also a take-no-prisoners political operative from whom even Karl Rove could have learned something. He made a lot of enemies. As leinie pointed out @ 19, his personal growth during the years after his brother’s assassination was awesome and his death will forever be one of the great might-have-beens of American history, as will the theft of the 2000 presidential election.
How did we get here, as TCU raises @12 regarding the presence of a goon like Grover Norquist in the public space? Check out Michael Lind’s Made in Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern takeover of American politics. The author makes a powerful case about how today’s GOP has been infused by the worst, exploitive aspects of Southern culture.
raven @ 66
I was 12 in ‘68. I has a cousin die in Vietnam, and was the sort of nerdy kid who watched the apalling Democratic convention (the ‘police riot’ where Chicago cops beat protesters and journalists at Mayor Daley’s orders), and Lyndon Johnson go on air to say he wasn’t running again. Somehow the lack of passion in the current scene is what frightens me. “The best lack all conviction, the worst have a passionate intensity..”
I will never forget how the hopes and dreams of responsible leaders were snuffed and in doing so to where the aspirations of a generation.
With Bush we have committed the identical mistakes which lead the the divisiveness and polarization in America. The same polarization that exist today. America is not united for this administration in failing to keep its eyes focused on the real causes of 911 permitted the neocon oil barons to morph the war against terrorist into a proactive oil grab while America was suffering from PTSD of 911. Just like VIetnam and the PTSD of the JFK , RFK, MLK put downs by powerful interests.
Where are the heirs to the “benefactors” of these “killings?”
The leaders within Kennedy family flawed stand head and shoulders above the Bush family. Bush and his minions are very, very small people, who want to tear everyone down to their level.
Listening to $$43 talk about Putin derailing democracy in Russia would be laughable if it didn’t nearly make me weep.
The Kennedys challenge–inspire–us to seek to stand as tall as them in the cause of what is right and noble.
Remembering RFK today in the context of being a Clean for Gene kid in LA that day working for McCarthy. And in the hope that America will emerge from this Dark Age to a new Renaissance of constructive idealism and participation to do better.
1968 was quite significant in world history. Not only RFK and MLK but May ‘68 in France and student protests in Mexico City–and the black power salute during the Olympics (also in Mexico City). And oh–the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, which shook up the US and South Vietnam. Also didn’t the Soviets also suppress “Prague Spring” in 1968?
MR. Bill @ 74
I agree, I was so pissed off when I came home I probably went a bit overboard with “passionate intensity.” Up against the Wall Motherfuckers”!
James Joyce @75:
With Bush we have committed the identical mistakes which lead the the divisiveness and polarization in America. The same polarization that exist today. America is not united for this administration in failing to keep its eyes focused on the real causes of 911 permitted the neocon oil barons to morph the war against terrorist into a proactive oil grab while America was suffering from PTSD of 911. Just like VIetnam and the PTSD of the JFK , RFK, MLK put downs by powerful interests.
Where are the heirs to the “benefactors” of these “killings?”
—————————-
One of them is the current president, the others are the people who profit from the shares of KBR which was a main benefaactor of LBJ’s escalation in Vietnam, the family of the founder of Bell Helicopters, and numerous other native and transplanted Texans.
You don’t have to look too far to see who the traitors are in this country. Too many of them have the flag they have disgraced prominently displayed in their lapels.
There goes Christy again, stimulating a thoughtful discussion. The world could use more of this.
Thanks!
Rayne @ 71
From Rayne’s link:
Quite apt for this thread.
albert fall@72
“We need to have at least one Dem–someone with some weight, not Kucinich–who will frame the question on Libby as one of treason. Even quoting George Bush I on outing agents as treason would do.”
Great point. Dems should be all over this, and mention it every time the discussion presents itself.
They outed a CIA agent, end of story.
RevDeb @ 46
I’m really lame when I try to articulate what I’m thinking, and today with Christy’s post combined with Scarecrow’s, my mind is sparking all over the place, but let me try (in other words, I’m not sure this’ll make sense)
RFK was a giant. And I think it takes even more courage today to be what Bobby Kennedy represents than it did then.
The first lesson of the reign of George the XLIII is this:
Never, never, ever entrust government to someone who believes that government is always bad and incompetent.
Bargain Countertenor @ 84
The goal of Republicans in government is to prove their claims that government cannot work, that it makes everything worse. They make this a self-fulfilling prohpecy.
I was a McCarthy supporter and was pissed when RFK came in and swept up the anti-war vote. He was a Johney come lately to the anti-war position- and had played a role with his brother in establishing our position in the Nam (of course the legendary Dulles brothers must have played a significant role as well.)
His death was a shock- God knows who killed him or why.
Still- yesterday’s political hacks always look better than todays–death cleans em up a bit- and the passage of time dulls the rough edges.
It’s a time for competence- the one thing that the electorate can’t sense in a candidate. Hope we get it.
Mr. Bill @ 74: there are several reasons why the populace has not become as angry with Iraq as they did with Viet Nam.
1) no draft
2) the media is under the control of the Right
3) families are too economically stressed
Each one of these conditions is the result of deliberate efforts to suppress dissent by members of the Right who learned lessons from Nixon’s downfall.
Biodun @ 9
Re: Libby:
Timmeh said on the Today Show this morning that Bush will be under a lot of pressure from his “base” (whatever that is these days) to pardon Libby if Walton sends him to prison during his appeal.
Poor George. I mean, here he is, In Europe doing his ding-dangedness to piss off the Russians, and now he’s got a Scooter problem with his 29% base. And they expect not only an immediate pardon – they want it done in *broad daylight*, fer chrissakes!
Prezidentin’ is hard. Poor George.
But hey, it’s almost August. Take the month off, son.
James Joyce @ 75
Oh they’re still around somewhere. Look for PNAC fingerprints.
I cannot understand the erectile dysfunction of the American People. Being an avowed “independent” it is disgusting to realize that the American people are less concerned about the economic “terrorism” inflicted by corporate America on the citizens via our own government, instead preoccupied by the cost of gas and inflated terrorist threats to America while we have inflicted brutal displaced anger in the form of destruction of Iraq. We where played for fools by BUSH AND EXECUTIVE OIL ET ALS………….
AMERICAN MERCANTILISM ???
AMERICAN BLOOD FOR OIL FOR SURE
A DEMOCRATIC IRAQ AND ALICE IN WONDERLAND!!!!!!!!!!!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 29
Your post is inspiring, CHS.
:)
rwcole, the HS in my neighborhood where I volunteer is having a Vietnam/60s event tonight. I am making some cookies, the daisy with the blue center, from the Clean Gene campaign. I’m using a peace symbol instead of the writing in the center. . .
rwcole @ 86
we need Competence, but we need Hope and Inspiration, too.
Sirhan Sirhan, Palestinian immigrant and LA resident who supposedly was upset by RFK’s policy on Israel. He is still serving his life sentence without parole. Previous attempts to parole him have failed.
Of course conspiracy theories abound.
Go see “Bobby” just release (2 weeks) on DVD. It’s a docu-drama about the RFK assassination. Some hilarious stuff about two cub MSM reporters doing acid in the Ambassador Hotel. It’s time travel at its best.
You must look at the special features section fabulous interviews by David Bender of people who knew Kennedy and were there. This gets 2 thumbs up.
CNN.com’s poll this morning is on whether the leaders in this country are ‘uniters’ or ‘dividers’.
‘Dividers’ is at 97 percent. (I wish, on these, that they’d have follow-up questions, in order to get a bit clearer picture.)
bg
Love it.
He was the last politician who I truly loved- something you can only do when you are very young.
Biodun @ 77
Someone say Olympic black power salute? Yesterday was the birthday of both Tommy Smith (b. 1944) and John Carlos (b. 1945).
I think Mike Barnicle is better than Tweetie.
He had RFK’s daughter on last night and she
nearly teared up with his wonderful questions… how much He IS missed…
Biodun
Yeah- Most of us didn’t buy the Sirhan Sirhan lone whacky assassin theory then- don’t think I buy it now.
those who govern don’t understand what government is for. It is for the advancement of society. It is to provide laws and opportunities and guidelines to secure and advance our society. But those in government see it as a way to advance their personal wealth and power. Who among us wouldn’t jump at the chance to be a Senator or President to do what is right for our nation? Would we be turned by the lure of power and wealth, or we work honestly to solve the problems and issues our nation faces? We can’t even dream of it, because we don’t have the money to buy our way in. How many people who have served in government, really were there to serve, or how many were there to feed?
1968. A long time ago.
I am surprised no one has reported any Walton bashing today. . .am sure it is happening.
I admired Bobby Kennedy, but he was never elected and it is questionable that he would have been. Neither was McCarthy. As a result of the split, Richard Nixon was narrowly elected. The next election is a chance to begin to recover values like the common good, collective security, government which works for the common good. I hope we don’t blow it.
P J Evans @ 96
Unfortunately, I think the poll is there to play off Lou Dobb’s rather disingeneous commentary on the same topic…Another one of those semantic exercises that can play multiple ways…
JF @ 85
You left out “while stealing everything that’s not nailed down along the way”.
Just here to help.
things come undone @ 18
True, I never thought of that. It would look pretty bad if Bush did that. Especially with all those C-Span callers with a righteous paranoia. Someone can get sent to Gitmo on a lark, but Scooter gets a free pass. Hmmm. Not very politic. I’d love to see Pumpkinhead go down as a champion of Scooter.
Biodun @ 81
Remember that television ad for flowers and its jingle, “We could be heroes”?
Yah. That.
Government.
Of the people.
By the people.
For the people.
That’s us, people, as in We, the People.
Accept no substitutes.
Awesome post Christy, you can really cut through the fog to a crystal clear message.
I doubt this country will ever see anything even close to the Kennedy’s or MLK again.
Way too many triangulating and finger in the wind people out there now.
Seems no one can stand up for their convictions.
MR. Bill @ 48
s’okay.
wasn’t much left to mop up when the crew was done yestidie. pretty much every crumb was gone.
maybe a little puddle by the witness chair…
Bay State Librul @ 99
Barnicle IS slightly better than Tweety but it is only a matter of small degrees. Even before the Globe booted him, I felt that he (as well as Howie Carr) were both basing their shtick on trying to be Boston versions of Mike Royko without having Royko’s talent.
My $.02
Diane @ 56
I was a bit younger, but I remember that too. It was a horrifying thing to see as a child. Then when I saw the Zapruder film, I was horrified as well.
Of course, now we don’t need to physically assassinate public figures, we just do character assassinations a la Rupert Murdoch.
My fear is that this 60’s scenario will all be repeated again if responsible, independent thinking, “popular” / “charismatic” leaders are voted into power by the people of the United States whose agendas are inconsistent with the monetary concerns of entrenched power in the United States. “THOSE CORPORATIONS OF AMERICA” who value profit more than life!!!!!!!!!!
Strategerie @ 8
Good point, but not the only point. My observation during the last election is that running for office is a tremendous strain, financially, physically, and mentally. It’s not fair to castigate those of us who care and pay attention for not running ourselves. The flat truth is that very few of us can afford to devote a year or 2, or 3 to running for office. One must be independenly wealthy for a start. And there’s where we are drawing our pool of candidates, from rich guys. Is it any wonder that we keep getting certain types of politicians, who can’t or don’t provide the understanding of constituent needs and leadership that we all are yelling about. Our most pressing problem, if we want to get progressive policies in place, is to get public campaign funding. Without that we’re stuck with a choice of rich, white, old ,men to choose from. So we get government of, for, and by rich, white, and old, men.
Adie @ 110
Well Talkingpointmemo sez they’ll have a Bradley Scholzman ‘best of’ video up soon. We can watch hims squirm…
Adie @ 110
Adie, OT from below, but sorry for the no spew alert. I just thought my limited description was sufficient in itself… Guess not, huh? ;})
The new line about Bush being liberal is like saying Robin Hood stole from the poor and gave to the rich.
Fitzy has taken many hits.
At what point do you think, he should
not “turn the other cheek” and speak up about
the real crimes committed by the Bush bullies?
Biodun @ 9
It’s important to remember that Russert is Dick Cheney’s go to guy. He’s still at the VP’s bidding.
Thanks Christy.
I pretty much came of voting age right before the Kennedy years.
Then the Kennedys, MLK, all gone in a flash of time.
Still trying to recover.
Probably never will, completely, but that’s o.k.
I know it made me a lot stronger.
this gangofthugs will.NOT.take.my. Constitution!
Bluetoe @ 119
So what kind of literary endeavours can we expect from Cell Block X?
Bay State Librul @ 118
A LONG TIME AGO…………………
I miss you Bobby. I miss you Jack. I miss you Martin. I miss you Yitzhak Rabin. I miss you Anwar Al-Sadat. I miss you Rachel Corrie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUoZX01C8yE
Bluetoe @ 119
I wonder though if Russert’s testimony did anything to damage that “relationship.”
new thread dialing for habeas
MR. Bill @ 115
OH YAYYYYYYYY!
Now THAT’s somethin’ I been prayin’ for all night long!!!!! ohboyohboyohboy
i just hope they don’t cut those handsome Senatorial comments. I needs the whole package.
If anyone hears of an uncut version, PLEASE give a shout-out!?! ;->
Oklahoma kiddo @ 123
AMEN!
Bay State Librul @ 99
Barnacle is still a plagiarist who got off easy. Even though the Boston Globe fired him, he was quickly hired by the Boston Herald and has been enjoying punditry on cable MSM eer since.
There’s a strong possibility that we will get a smooth talkin charismatic stumble bum this time around- God Forbid- but very possible…
Romney and Obama have the slickest tongues- can’t tell if either knows what the fuck they are doin.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802)
3rd president of US (1743 – 1826)
It is worse that Jefferson feared!!!
NATURAL SELECTION CORPORATE T(R)EASON AND “EXECUTIVE OIL”
I was an admirer of Bobby Kennedy, and to a lesser extent, Gene McCarthy. However, neither was ever elected and it is doubtful they would have been, given the fractured Democratic Party. The result was a narrow victory for Richard Nixon and the beginning of the end of the FDR coalition. The next election offers a chance to work back toward some national understanding of values such as government which works toward the common good, and collective security. I hope we don’t blow through more tunnel vision.
Rayne @ 42
answer: go to war in Iraq.
dakine 01 at 116
Some spews are truly enjoyable. ;->
oddmommy @ 132
Wrong: START A WAR WITH IRAN NOW!!!!
Fresh thread for everyone. And a request for a little action from Sen. Leahy…
The FDR coalition was created by the great depression. Another depression would recreate it in a heartbeat- but at a huge cost.
The heart of the coalition was “the workin man”.
The “working man” is still there- but he’s largely non-union and he’s pretty confused about who- if anyone- has his interest at heart.
He sees the dems doin things for the poor- and the goopers doin things for the rich- but not much comin his way- and he’s still a little freaked out by the velocity and direction of social change.
Someone could create a party that caters to him- but no one has so far.
Goopers go after him through his religion- and throw him a few peanuts at tax cut time. In many cases he goes for it cause it’s the best deal he’s been offered.
Adie @ 126
C-SPAN has an archive of all their programs. On their main page, scroll down to the bottom and click on “all recent programs” and look for the hearing.
The FDR coalition was created by the great depression. Another depression would recreate it in a heartbeat- but at a huge cost.
The heart of the coalition was “the workin man”.
The “working man” is still there- but he’s largely non-union and he’s pretty confused about who- if anyone- has his interest at heart.
He sees the dems doin things for the poor- and the goopers doin things for the rich- but not much comin his way- and he’s still a little freaked out by the velocity and direction of social change.
Someone could create a party that caters to him- but no one has so far.
Goopers go after him through his religion- and throw him a few peanuts at tax cut time. In many cases he goes for it cause it’s the best deal he’s been offered.
….rwcole:
I fully agree, but it might be time for think tanks to come up with an evolution of the New Deal, Fair Deal, New Frontier, Great Society, which aims at ensuring equal access to the declining middle class. It might bring the “workin’ class” back and work for the greater good. But, would have 30 years of laissez faire propaganda to overcome.
JFK and Bobby lived in a different country. That USA is not today’s USA; now we’re just a collection of meaner, selfish and self- righteous groups. Evangelical hatred had not poisoned the well of humanity and tolerance yet. Then, most Americans were positive that their struggles for a better life with happiness and prosperity would come from a leader who understood what America could be, to become great through our collective efforts, to lift our spirits and challenge our talents. Corporatism was mild then. Today it is cancerous. Political discourse was civil, now it is diabolical. Voters were hopeful, now we are cynical and fatalistic. The America I knew and loved is circling the drain in the tub of history,
PMA
I don’t think these guys ever bought the “free enterprise” propoganda. Actually not many even listen to it- or understand it. It’s basically 18th century economic theory brushed up and reduced to sound bites.
It doesn’t much interest a plumber.
He’s interested in:
Another two bucks per hour
Low interest mortgage and help to buy a house
Secure health care
College for his kids
Affordable energy prices
Some relief from the drugs, sex, and rock and roll culture he sees around him and that he fears will eat his children.
Nothin too complicated about it at all
He’s also scared when he sees his neighborhood invaded by people who speak a language he doesn’t understand.
Most politicians know all these things about him.
J Daniel
Yeah- them were the days- lynchins, governors blockin the doors of universities to black kids, National Guard troops shootin down war protestors, blowin up black churches- with black people in em, nothin but minimum wage jobs for blacks AND women.
The good ol days.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 123
Rachel Corrie…another assault on decency by our Israeli friends like the attack on the USS Liberty during the 6 day war that went unanswered and was buried so Americans wouldn’t know of the crimes perpetrated by the nation we supply with BILLIONS of dollars.
Absolutely F’g incredible that there was no uproar here. Rahm should be asked how he feels about that war crime.
rwcole,
You’re right, but they did buy into the idea that the government simply redistributes taxes to the undeserving to deny them and their children.
j daniel,
Yes, but the government was on the side of right, and the good guys were winning.
Can you imagine Bushco having to give a basically extemporaneous speech such as this? He could never ever pull off such a thing. Having just heard the news about MLK there was no way that RFK could have prepared a speech. It was truly from the heart and honest.
The Indianapolis speech on 4/4/68 was a great one, but not the greatest. The one the following day (4/5/68) was even better, and perhaps the greatest was delivered 41 years ago today, in South Africa, during the “Days of Affirmation” to those collegians who became the generation that ended Apartheid and freed Mandela. You remember . . . don’t you?
Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance
Bobby was a fearless campaigner (remember how he stood on the back of cars, secured only by the belt, to throngs of frenzied well-wishers), who spoke his mind without measuring his words about the things that mattered most (remember the footage from the visit in the West VA mining towns that is featured in “Bobby”?), and no, he didn’t jump right into the race in ‘68 when people wanted him to – it was a time when running against a sitting president from one’s own party was secular blasphemy, and he was no doubt still struggling with the fallout from his brother’s death. Tet, “Cronkite” and New Hampshire all had an impact on his decision, and once in he ran like “the dickens;” not a week goes by that I don’t think about his loss, and what impact it had for this country. For starters, imagine the Vietnam Wall being half the size that it is (nearly half of the fatalities in the war occurred after 1968). Imagine a world without President Tricky.
rwcole @ 141
Tell it!
training the brain/
exercizes the body/
training the body/
exorcizes Bush *g*.
Once there were Presidents in the White House
Now there are only tyrants occupying
Like they occupy Afghanistan and Iraq
and surrepticiously connive against Iran
for figments of facts occuring in their dreams.
Lies and fraud are the tools,
lies and fraud are their legacy.
rwcole @ 86
I gradually became of the view that McCarthy became one of the many ego trippers of that era. He had the opportunity to be lasting positive influence and he just revealed himself as something of a gadfly.
What we needed then and we need now is smarts, vison and competence. And that is not Robert Schrum, Kerry, Clintons, Gore
Oklahoma kiddo @ 123
an Molly an Steve
…and 2 months later, he was murdered. I was 11 at the time and lived just outside Chicago. After MLK’s death and the riots that ensued. RFK’s death than the 68 Democratic Convention riots I rember thinking the world was imploding.
Such an awful time following the summer of love. I remember thinking I can’t wait for 1969, it can only get better. Kind of how I’m thinking now about Jan. 2009!
stephen @ 144
In some sense, we did get to see how George Bush would react–on September 11, 2001. I was embarrassed for him. Not for his politics or his many flaws, but just that he seemed a child himself, unable to speak without being told what to say. I am fine having an uncharismatic leader, but he needs to be an adult, and decent.
James Joyce @ 90
It is a CF of colossal proportions:
-Health care is tied to employment
-Debt is at all-time high
-Corporations have developed private security/
police entities to threaten,
invade and intimidate whistleblowers
-Law enforcement has been corrupted
(has become an much an extension of
private, partisan security as v.v.)
-Congress is in bed with corporations
-Campaigns are financed by corporations
Did I miss anything?
Although it is not *right* by any stretch,
from a systems standpoint, a major blowout
in some direction was predictable.
It will require as much a social consciousness
evolution as it will an economy-and-currency modeling evolution.
We must drive the meme of corporate terrorism,
to speak directly to the ELEPHANT in the room, that of absolute misery, terror and oppression in the workplace. Then we must stand together,
reverse the trend of being complicit with
“divide and conquer” – i.e., participating
in whatever is the latest individual public
humiliation (mini-Iraqs), and direct all
shaming towards corporate abuses, regardless
of whatever shiny objects they dangle.
We can’t seem to get beyond the titillation
and drug of public individual humiliation,
whichever side of the fence we’re on.
/2nd rant of the day *g*
a monument was erected on the site of that speech–a sculpture of RFK and MLK facing each other, each holding out one arm. their hands do not touch, but at least they are reaching out to one another. a monument of hope.
I always loved that speech and try to live by that quote. It too gives me hope that the best is within us. Thanks Christy for sharing.
I believe we are in a ideology tug-o-war between (among many things) two generations – the boomers that came of age just a hair b/w WWII and Vietnam and those in our 30’s and 40’s. I see glimmers of a desire to move beyond the Darwin philosophy of the past 20 or so years which bred aselfish “all about…” attitude that is now wearing thin. (aka George and Dick). We simply don’t have the time in our lives to be anything more then authentic. Those with the me attitude are taking from us all.
Leadership is our responsibility. Both to reach for it within ourselves and to support those who are willing to put themselves out there. I’m hopeful that this trend towards authenticity, which Bobby embodied in his last few years (ahead of the curve as always), will result in a new understanding of how we should govern, support and live.
i’m jumping in w/o reading the previous comments.
i believe that amer. history was profoundly changed by the assassinations of the 60’s (to include the attempt on george wallace; kept the election out of the dem. house of representatives. convienent that. wallace’s removal also had the regrettable impact of not forcing the dem. party to explain to white working class americans, their base, that helping blacks was in their best interest, and they were getting screwed by the ptb, powers that be. the dems have wondered in the partially self imposed wilderness ever since then by failing to take care of working class america’s wallets. this sh*t has been going on in amer. ever since bacon’s rebellion in virginia circa 1670ish. and every time forces bring forth a champion that will unite black and poor white amer. the establishment about breaks out in hives and sh*ts itself, and takes action.)
i want to call your attention to a new book out there by david talbot. brothers. the hidden history of the kennedy years. while i have a gripe or two, overall it is magesterial. it chock full of insights. i thought i knew post ww2 american history. besides a life long love affair, i have spent the past 8 years researching this era for a book i’m going to write. (i’ve spent too much damn time following the ongoing train wreck that is awol boy and deadeye dick, and not enough time researching, but, c’est la vie.)
do yourselves a favor. go and buy it. it is a treat. it is, quite simply, one of the most important books you will ever read.
Akin to the saying that “the best work the Devil ever did was making people believe he never existed,” is the way authoritarians promote the belief that government in and of iself is bad so people don’t trust it to protect them.
The claim is made by some people of interpreting all state action as mere “interference,” as if a popularly elected government was merely a protections racket, is intellectually fraudulent. I see from such people little rational discussion on where to draw the lines between government and everything else that arises from a society and its fundamental belief systems.
The term “limited government” is a baseless canard, as if anyone defends “unlimited government,” and as repugnant is the use of the term “government” that does not recognize differences between the popular will of the people via democracy and other less legitimate forms of government.
Refusing to see the distinction renders democracy unthinkable and void and legitimizes a mindset that rejects social contracts between people for the common benefit. What surely follows is not anarchy, in its true political sense, but the law of the jungle. And I can only assume that is the plan of most of the more virulent authoritarians, who believe that they are the strong and will rule the jungle. It is not in any sense a political philosophy, rather one of a method of achieving power.
Libby, and whomever fed him Plame’s identity are both damned traitors. He deserved what he got and more. These guys put the security of the free world at risk in order to score points for their political party. In other words they put Party above their duty to US.
What’s even more sad is all the people saying that he should not be punished for it. ‘He didn’t actually do anything… it’s just a Process crime’ is ludicrous! Clinton gets impeached for lying about something that was nobody’s business. Libby lies to get us into a war that’s going to bankrupt this nation and people want to give him a pass? Apparently the Rule of Law only applies if you’re not a rich white, male, Christian, Republican, right O’Reilly?
Then there’s all those BS letters. As though their word that he spent a lifetime of loyal service to the US could wipe away the fact that when we most needed him as a people he freaking stabbed us in the back. As it was pointed out, Libby’s not even freaking sorry about it! We needed someone with some damned sense to come out and tell us that Bush was lying to us about the war and when someone tried to, they moved to discredit him so they could move on with their war of choice anyway.
I’m sure Bush will pardon Libby as one of his last few acts as President. So none of this has much relevance anyway and that, will be a travesty of justice.
Thank you for a wonderful post. I tell my children that I feel regret that they and their generation never had the opportunity to have leaders that could lead and inspire. Malcolm, Martin,JFK and RFK, I will never see the likes of them again in my lifetime. They were giants,though flawed and heroes, though scarred. The so-called leaders today, both dems and repubs, pale in comparison.
May I suggest a new book, FDR by Jean Edward Smith, Random House, 2007. (over 800 pages with bibliography and massive footnotes) I am nearly finished with it, having picked it up last week while shopping for Gore’s new book. Smith is a grand historical biographer — I really enjoyed his bio of Ulysses Grant that came out in 2001, and while I have not yet found a copy, I also want to read his bio of John Marshall.
So why a new book on FDR? — why recommend it here? Lots of reasons. Smith has essentially responded to out Bush disaster by comprehending that what Bush was really about was destroying any remaining vestage of the New Deal and the Progressive traditions on which that was built. Smith’s response is to use FDR as a guide to precisely that conflict in the early 20th century when the forces of economic royalism confronted those of a Progressive Commonwealth, and through mostly adroit politics, the common good won out, and indeed remained the core political center till at least the end of the 1960’s. In otherwords the overall point of Smith’s work is that we have been where we are now before, and it is useful to know how politics led to deep and profound change.
I think those newly interested in Democratic Party Politics will find the first half of the book very useful — afterall it took FDR a number of years to build the coalition that elected him in 1932 — and how he built it and out of what is highly useful information for any activist. I would particularly point folk here toward the near disaster of 1938, when Roosevelt tried to use the primaries to rid the Democratic party of ten ultra conservative Senators, and in the process nearly destroying his own base. Smith does a great job reconstructing that election, and showing how it really was responsible for denying FDR the latitude he needed in Foreign Affairs to confront the Fascist threats.
I also appreciate, in the context of today, the emphasis he puts on FDR’s relationship with Louis Howe, FDR’s version of the Karl Rove role. Howe, a newspaperman, first met FDR when FDR was in the New York State Senate, probably about 1910 — and he spent the remainder of his days making FDR President. Howe died in 1936. Smith, quite rightly, gives many pages to the Cox/Roosevelt Campaign of 1920, much of it designed by Howe — and in truth the first modern campaign for the Presidency. (FDR essentially invented the Whistle Stop campaign, and in 1920 he crossed the country four times, with side tours up and down both coasts. While Cox/Roosevelt went down to deep defeat, Howe essentially used the campaign as a dry run for what he would do between 1930 and 32 in first getting the nomination, and then winning the election. Understanding how the party was organized way back then — and how Louis Howe captured the existing political organization, and turned it to FDR’s purposes is just brilliantly done. Of course our party has evolved since then — but local and state dynamics remain much the same.
Smith also has a smaller book out, George Bush’s War, a fairly devastating critique of Bush’s statecraft — and he makes good use of that in framing FDR for a contemporary audience, most of whom have no memory of
“that man.” FDR is not really a comparative study, but anyone who has been following the news over the past six years will find the contrasts and comparisons leap off the page and many will delight Bush Critics. All the ammo you need to debate the Grover Nordquists of the world are right there — Government can’t do anything??? Well, once it did in the hands of a master — and the benefits were profound. Just take a little staistic such as in 1933 only 2% of American Farms had electricity — FDR built REA beginning in 1935, and by 1940 50% of Farms were on the grid. And it was all done by organizing farmer owned co-ops that could borrow money at low interest, long term, and build a local distribution system. This created jobs, reopened many a copper mine, created a market for electric milking machines and washing machines and radios. Targeted investment created markets, but it also created thousands of modern civic organizations. We’ve long forgotten all these programs that essentially disprove Nordquist — and we let him rant because we have lost the history that provides the response. And by the way, there were plenty of Republican Nordquists back in the 20’s and 30’s — and most of them ended up on the dustheap, but for some reason their ideology survived.
Likewise the 30’s were full of Religious Charlatans, many in full bleat against FDR on Radio. Did you know one reason the 1934 act creating the FCC had a “fairness” doctrine was because of the right wing radio preachers? Reading through some of the debate about FCC made me smile quietly. We all would be more confident that change is possible if we just knew details about how it once was created.
Anyhow, for anyone having something of a black hole in your available knowledge of the 20’s the depression, and then World War II and its politics — this is a very rich read, particularly because in the hands of a skilled biographer FDR’s politics are so similar to our contemporary debates.
raven @ 35
It seems we’re always fighting ourselves. Something in us drives us furiously and it isn’t all smooth sailing, sometimes there’s turmoil (such as now).
The obvious way out is to recognize the good and hold on to it tightly, never let go. Our better leaders do that and they tell us so we can jump on their bandwagon.
The great leaders smooth the path, entice us to listen, tickle our ears with great prose as they teach us, remind us and gently, ever so gently, lead. That’s what we miss about the Kennedy “boys”.
Peterr 137
Thanks MUCH! I looked, but I think I was just too anxious/early. I’ll check back there ;->