The news of Steve Gilliard's death was, to put it mildly, pretty stunning. Even though he'd had health issues for a number of years, it was still a blow when he passed over to the other side, and away at last from pain's grip.
But I think that Steve would want us to pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and get back to work. As depressing and disheartening as his subject matter could often be, he was at heart an optimistic person. When people talked about the suspension of habeas corpus and other matters and that there was no way that America they had known could recover, he gently but forcefully reminded them that for people of color, habeas corpus has always been iffy and didn't actually exist for the first four score and seven years of this country's life. There were two main lessons here: 1) The America that most light-skinned people (myself included) know is, to this day, not the same country as the one that Steve Gilliard and other black Americans inhabited; 2) As bad as it seems to be now, we — and black Americans especially — have seen worse and yet managed to emerge from the struggle better off than before. Only when we give up have we truly lost.
So, in honor of Steve Gilliard's life and work, I hereby present the following Reasons To Be Cheerful:
– Looks like there's been a big, BIG breakthrough at Purdue University in the creation of energy from hydrogen. Dr. Jerry Woodall of Purdue talks about using tap water, aluminium and gallium to generate energy safely, cheaply and easily using current technologies at a cost of around 2 cents per kilowatt hour, which is comparable to what gasoline costs right now; all that's needed is the venture capital (or better yet, government involvement) to pull this off. (Our next President, if he or she's a Democrat, should be pushed to pull this off.) This, when added to the gains made in existing energy technologies, may well be what saves us.
– A major breakthrough in AIDS treatment is reportedly on the horizon. Three new drugs are set to revolutionize the treatment of the thousands of AIDS patients in the UK, and the millions more around the world, who are infected with those forms of the virus most resistant to conventional treatment. Hiroyu Hatano, an infectious disease specialist, and Steven Deeks, an associate professor of medicine from San Francisco General Hospital and the University of California, wrote in the British Medical Journal that while this will not end the problems presented by drug-resistant AIDS strains, "We will probably witness in the next year a remarkable transformation in the prognosis of a generation of chronically ill, HIV-infected adults."
– Even Evangelical Christians are less conservative than they were twenty years ago, according to various studies and polls referenced by Christianity Today. For instance: In 1987, 73% of American evangelicals thought it was OK to fire gay schoolteachers; now, only 42% think this — a drop of nearly half in twenty years. Over that same period of time, the number of evangelicals who thought AIDS might be a punishment on gays has dropped from 60% to 38%, and the number of evangelicals who don't think that women should go back to their "traditional" societal roles (i.e., return to being baby machines that are the sole property of their husbands) has grown from only 20% in 1987 to 42% today.
Speaking of optimism, there's a concert coming up on July 7 that's devoted to that theme. One of the folks involved is a guy you may have heard of, Al Gore. I'm told that this should be worth watching.
Related posts:
- There are Reasons Alan Grayson Inspires Absolute Rage on the Part of Anti-American Right-Wingers
- Late Night: You Know, Perhaps There Are Reasons the GOP Is Having Trouble with Hispanic Voters…
- There are Reasons to Worry About Insurance Exchanges – Just Not Ezra’s
- Reid’s Re-Elect Reasons to be Rocky
- Lurita Doan: Still a Moron, Though Thankfully Not on Our Dime





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

PW!!
I’ve just begun.
So how is everybody this afternoon? Did you all get the zeds you need? :-)
Will Judge Walton:
Reward Loyalty to the President or Punish Obstruction of Justice?
Firepups wanna know! I’ve just made my sixth consecutive monthly contribution of $25.07 to support FireDogLake’s history-making Live-blogging, insightful articles and the best commentarial analysis in the Blogosphere – and it feels great!
Please join Jane and Marcy for Libby Sentencing Live-blogging from Judge Walton’s DC Courtroom tomorrow at 9:30 a.m.!
And Please Donate Today!
Ian Dury and the Blockheads…one of the best ever.
radiofreewill @ 4
And this is yet another reason to be cheerful!
Here’s another reason for optimism: ALL the Democratic candidates for President favor allowing gay and lesbian Americans to serve openly in the armed services. This happened last nite (”raise yer hand”) for the first time ever.
Enough with railroading highly trained Arab language special*sts outta the service because of where they like to put their dirty bits. The Brits, French, and Israelis allow gays to serve, and none report any issues. So, get over it, Peter Pace.
Thanks for a great post PW. I appreciate the props for Steve, big loss in so many ways. FWIW another very short link about the hydrogen
Reason to be cheerful—we saved the lives of 12 small children in St. Petersburg this past week. Usually it’s only 5. I’m happy :)
umm, those numbers about the evangelicals, while better, are still pretty damn scary.
egregious, congratulations. really great news!
PW, thanks for the post. A little correction to one’s perspective is always a welcome thing.
jayt @ 10
As Christy was saying this morning, it’s a marathon not a sprint. Although in this case, it is an ultra-marathon. Maybe like the Run to the Sun?
randiego @ 11
It’s the result of moving the responsibilities of 2 people farther away from patients so they can’t kill as many out of ignorance and arrogance.
Can we manage this with our government somehow?
ThinkProgress: Boehner will try to force Jefferson expulsion
We’re tryin’.
*g*
considering the hydrogen thingy : fuel cells are a somewhat better method to store electric energy for electric cars than simple batteries. a better way to generate hydrogen means less loss on the way, but still the electricity has to be generated somehow – and that better be not from coal plants.
If members of my party, the Democratic Party have been less than legal, they should suffer the consequences.
jayt @ 10
Oh, yeah, and there is an intense rearguard action. But the good guys are winning. Slowly but surely, the good guys are winning.
Yet another reason for cheer: the government of Laos is apparently safe from Californians plotting to overthrow it.
Thank you PW, it does seem that the grim news piles up. I don’t know about you guys but I badly need to recharge and come back with some optimism.
Fact of the matter is… when an elected member of my party (Dems) is caught with her/his hand in the cookie jar, I really become agitated.
er, that would be optimism.
[Mod: And that’s just what your comment says now ]
Pelosi better get in front of this Dollar Bill Jefferson thing — and FAST.
I’m optimistic that the worm has really turned for this administration. They seem almost snakebitten in their incompetence. It’s just a matter of removing them through proper constitutional channels. I don’t think we can wait out the remaining 18 months of this term.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 21
Crooks are crooks. I don’t care what party: get rid of them.
Fantastic news about the new AIDS treatments!
haven’t read the paper yet (or listened to the radio show), but it sounds like the breakthrough is in how the hydrogen is generated (to be used as a fuel) – but hydrogen is not the source of energy stored in the vehicle. do i have that wrong?
TeddySanFran @ 7
… and Canada too …
Don’t forget Poland !!!
Stephen Parrish, CPA @ 14
Funny — if Boehner really had wanted Jefferson gone, he would have been happy to help the FBI search Jefferson’s offices last year. Instead, we got this:
“creation of energy from hydrogen” should probably be “creation of hydrogen from energy”.
Kay in Maine #26,
Linky, please?
carolyn urban @ 25
Exactly. ;0)
Boner was complainin bout the executive branch raiding the offices of the legislative branch- of course he STILL wanted the dem put in the pokey.
TeddySanFran @ 23
amen.
just saw this:
ok, i’m going to put myself in the corner now – for not playing nice and cheerful.
selise @ 27
Actually, they’re very close to getting the process set up so that it can be done in the vehicle. The aluminum, once used, is then sent back to the plant to be “recharged” with electrons (and of course while this takes — you guessed it — electricity — that can be provided by wind, solar, or what-have-you at a negligible carbon footprint compared to what we’re doing now. And the aluminum, gallium and water needn’t be pure — tap water will do.
Speaker Pelosi on Jefferson indictments:
Via Thinkprogress.
everybody have your popcorn ready?
besides Scooter tomorrow, don’t forget that Schlozman is back from vacation! http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=2799
Sen. Whitehouse, come on down!
So late to the lake today so forgive me if this is old news but the front page post at Kos reports the bungling of the Bush administration may end war crime act and neuter military commmission act.
I remain a strong advocate for Gore for president.
rwcole @ 30
No, it is the creation of energy from hydrogen. Liquid hydrogen is already used to power rockets and spacecraft.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 39
Woo Hoo me Too!
ReElect President Al Gore in 2008. Accept no substitute! ;~)
RonD @ 31
In PW’s post uptop.
Woodhall Hollow @ 36
The Democrats should be in front of every microphone available, comparing this to the Republicans’ reaction when
The Adulterating HammerTom DeLaywas indicted by Ronnie Earle.
Jefferson must be made to resign. If he’s exonerated, he can run again for the seat. But he must be made to resign, and now.
Phoenix Woman @ 35
that was my understanding… sounds like the breakthrough is in hydrogen generation from aluminum – not in the generation of energy from hydrogen.
we’re still left with how to generate all that electricity… is the benefit that batteries are not needed? i should just listen to the report and read the paper. please feel free to ignore me.
Paging Al Gore. Stat!
U.S. scales back climate science via satellites
‘Overall climate program in serious jeopardy,’ NOAA and NASA experts say
Let’s not forget – every incumbent Dem won re-election last November!
Most people thought we would win back the House, but we got the Senate, too!
Now, six months into the 110th Congress, we’ve got legislative oversight with subpoena power back in play – and, for the first time in six long years, the BushCo rats are peering out from the gulag windows.
Like Christy says – Marathon not a Sprint – but the tide is turning…
randiego @ 37
I’m off tomorrow and looking forward to a day of c-span and blogging. And to make things even more perfect, tomorrow’s French Open Tennis should be a great too.
Principle trumps expediency.
Speaking of evangelicals & energy: I am hopeful about the creation (no punaise intended) of the Evangelical Environmental Network.
Excellent PBS program (avail for web-viewing here): Evangelicals and the Environment.
John Casper: The Grist link is interesting — though it looks as if not many of the commenters, particularly the anti-fuel-cell ones, actually bothered to listen to the TOTN piece (which is the same one I cited): They keep ranting about the cost, when Woodall specifically states that the cost using his method would be about what gas is right now — and would have the extra benefit of greatly reducing the carbon footprint. I didn’t see anyone directly addressing anything Woodall said.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 49
For government, that can only be true when Republics have no power.
Gore WILL be the next POTUS. This is a replay of Kennedy stealing it (funny business in Illnois) from Nixon in 1960 and yet Nixon back as POTUS in 8 years in 1968. The differeence this time is the parties are reversed but basically history is reapeating itself.
Great post, PW. I’ve been following the hydrogen news for a while. There is reason for optimism, indeed.
40 Badwater says:
June 4th, 2007 at 3:39 pm
rwcole @ 30
“creation of energy from hydrogen” should probably be “creation of hydrogen from energy”.
“No, it is the creation of energy from hydrogen. Liquid hydrogen is already used to power rockets and spacecraft. “
I would have thought that there’s no issue about how to get energy out of hydrogen- just light a match.
The problem is to find the most efficient way to get the hydrogen freed from water by using the least possible energy.
freed hydrogen in effect becomes a battery- a storage vehicle.
TeddySanFran @ 44
It doesn’t look good. Jefferson may very well be guilty. But I wouldn’t want to set a precedent of forced expulsion at the time of indictment. What if someone innocent is indicted. Let’s not forgot that the DOJ, as we have seen, is corruptible. Having said that, I wish he would resign
Did someone mention “concert”?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7M1Se-p7uk
One thing that I have never understood is why conservatives are knee jerk against alternatives to oil energy, with the exception of nuclear energy. Whether the need is for more energy or for cleaner energy or for less dependence on foreign sources, they are against all alternatives on a visceral level.
newspaperbrat @ 38
That sounds like good news to me!
Bob in HI
Oklahoma kiddo @ 39
Whenever he comes to Toronto, or goes to any part of the world, the reception that Al Gore receives is much more than Clinton or JFK.
He is the unanointed World Leader and can do the most to right the wrongs of this administration.
Please, for all our sakes, Run Al Run !!!
solai @ 56
It appears after googling Adam Clayton Powell and James Traficant (names off the top of my head) that the historical precedent has been expulsion AFTER conviction, not on indictment. If he chose to resign honorably, he would most likely be able to keep his retirement (Duke Cunningham anyone?
Badwater
Not all. Clusterfuck and the Goopers are fine with hydrogen and have been advocating spending a lot of money on it for years. Why? Because they forsee hydrogen being freed using COAL and the COAL industry is a major gooper supporter.
Badwater @ 58
They aren’t knee-jerk against alternatives – they are knee-jerk against whatever we are for.
Spiritcatcher @ 16
The other consideration that we are not yet addressing is the overall impact of this particular fuel cell technology. How much energy is required to generate gallium — which is not found in a pure state but in other minerals? How much ecological damage will obtaining gallium create? Are there other options to applying the science behind this fuel cell technology besides burning hydrogen?
Likely this latest news has been more than 7 years in the making, too; how long will it be until it can actually be commercialized? There may be venture capital, but what will it take to reach break even?
Badwater @ 40
Actually, energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but it can be transformed. The most common form is kinetic energy, energy of motion: em-vee-squared over two. Our moving cars, are the result of chemical energy from hydrocarbons.
Most of our current engineers and the corporations that own them, lack the imagination and talent to develop non polluting energy sources.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 57
Great video…saw him in concert around that time…damn, I must be old!
Petrocelli @ 60
;0)
Badwater @ 58
They are pushing Ethanol from Corn, which produces more pollution than oil … typical for Bush & Co.
selise @ 45: How to generate the energy to be stored? Wind’s an option. So’s solar and water. (Of course, since Prof. Woodall’s an old-line scientist, he also brought up nuclear power, though he didn’t discuss how to deal with the waste.) What I’d like to see would be the new flexible photovoltaic strips applied to wind turbine blades and the towers themselves: That would pick up a few extra kilowatt-hours per tower, I’m sure.
I was even contemplating the spaces on our vehicles that currently go to waste that could be storing solar energy. The top of the dashboard, for instance — especially on cab-forward designs. Wouldn’t be enough to rapidly power up a car, but it might be enough to top it off, or maybe allow you to run some auxillary devices (phone/radio/etc.) while the main battery powered the car’s wheels.
Or what about golf carts, with their flat roofs? They could be partially charging themselves even when in use.
randiego @ 63
they’re knee-jerk against distributed power generation… and knee-jerk for centralized power generation with high entry costs.
how else are they going to be able to manipulate the markets, if every DFH can put up a solar cell or a windmill or other form of decentralized power generation?
Oklahoma kiddo @ 67
Hey OKK, I repeat my previous statement … that if he is not elected POTUS, we’re going to give him Canadian citizenship and make him our Prime Minister. *g*
Joe Wilson interviewed by Jason Leopold:
And I’m especially glad to hear some quite upbeat feedback about their civil case’s motion to dismiss hearing with Judge Bates et al:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/060407A.shtml
Energy storage seems to be an important part of the energy equation.
For example:
The most cost effective way of producing energy may well be wind power. Technology continues to evolve- giving wind power a cost lower in many cases to electricity produced by natural gas or coal..
The problem is- the wind doesn’t blow all the time- so you need a back up- if the back up is natural gas- you need a plant that is capable of supplying 100 percent of the need- since wind power is sometimes zero.. that means a doubling of capital expenditure which could bury the advantage of wind power.
An efficient inexpensive means of storing the energy produced by wind would eliminate that need for back up production capability- the same for solar- so hydrogen CAN be very important if it’s “generation” is efficient.
It’s still not the essay I want to write, but at the end of the work day it’s the best I can do for now. Some thoughts about politics, and our role in it as bloggers.
Phoenix Woman @ 69
How about the entire vehicle body, PW? using “smart dust” in paint as a carrier; perhaps a nanotechnology that does what photovoltaic cells do, over a plastic conductive body that acts as a collector…
Oklahoma kiddo @ 2
Somebody ought to write a song…
hayduke @ 53
Not sure I understand your comment but sure do like the idea the Honorable Al Gore being re-elected for he is in a league all his own and no one is more qualified to be President.
Loo Hoo. @ 76
Rayne’s blogs keep falling on my head…
OT
Rayne, it’s a little thing, but I found the link for folding a trash can liner
comment #43 in the inky hornets thread.
On a tangenital point ,the heat generated by braking in vehicles is the energy being dissipated from acceleration.
Brake rotors get red hot and glow under hard braking.
This is one example of energy regeneration in hybrid and electric cars with “generators’ being mounted by the wheel assemblies.
when coasting and braking, this energy is captured and stored for reuse.
Elliott @ 79
Oh, there you are, I did want to say thank you for that!! Appreciate it greatly since that’s about all that the Washington Post is good for any more — lining one’s trash can.
I suspect we will want to use that link again in the future, don’t you? ;-)
punaise @ 78
But that doesn’t mean my eyes will soon be turning Redd.
punaise @ 78
Uh-oh. That comes perilously close to outing me, punaise…I suspect if my winger ex-SO read that, my super secret identity would be broken. Heh.
Frank33 @ 65
I don’t believe they lack the imagination or talent, it’s about greed, plain and simple. The oil guys tell me it costs a few dollars per barrel to pull oil out of the ground, and processing it is relatively inexpensive … hence the large profit margins by Exxon, Shell, et al.
According to conservative estimates, there’s approximately $300 Trillion dollars worth of oil in the Earth, and they do not want anyone reducing their market share.
Engineers have the talent and imagination and will to develop alternative, they just need unfettered access to resources, like they have in Europe.
According to Breaking Blue on MyDD, “rightwing asshats” are trying to have Steve Gilliard’s biographical article deleted. Despite the admonition by Wikipedia not to participate in the whether to delete discussion, I think it’s important for people influenced by Gilliard’s work to say so.
PW-
Good post. Thanks!
Another good resource to underscore your point is the book by Paolo Freire, The Pedagogy of Hope. This by the radical educator from Latin America who has lived through much worse political times than we have, but who also served– briefly– in a government position. Freire’s story is really quite remarkable, and what he mainly does in this book is to tell stories.
Freire is very much a grass roots kinda guy. His idea of fun is to go to a rural or poor community, and start a class on literacy by teaching the group to read their newspapers. Wouldn’t be a bad idea to try here! I do recommend the book. It is worth your time.
Bob in HI
I like all of our potential nominees. Every one of them. But, like everyone else, I fear that Hillary could energize the repub base. My mother’s husband is a die-hard republican and he has never acknowledged that the pres or any repub has ever done anything wrong. Last election…he didn’t vote. I never mentioned it to him but apparently something must be getting through. I like that malaise and don’t want to do anything to reverse it.
newspaperbrat @ 77
… not even The Donald ?!! *g*
sorry ’bout the ear worm….. :~)
Petrocelli @ 88
… not even The Donald ?!! *g*
Spew alert!
Rayne @ 81
Oh yes! I can’t think of a better use for the ComPost, the MoonieTimes, and well, gee, just about all of them
Newpaperbrat @ 77.
I’m getting at the fact that Bush had some funny business going on in Florida in 2000 , like JFK did in Illinois in 1960. (Hey, I like JFK as much as the next Dem but he stole that election, at least his dad pulled some strings at a minimum) and yet Gore will be the POTUS 8 years later just like with Nixon, who also sat out 1964 just like Gore did 2004. both ended up President after being robbed of it is my point. Its all about who Gore will pick for V.P. at this point and warding off any dirty tricks from the Hillary/Carville camp.
I’d love to see Gore as President but one thing that has always bothered me is why IN HELL did he pick Liberman??? Probally forced on him. V.P. often are.
Al Gore will be the next POTUS. He’ll have a Nobel Peace Prize to add to his Oscar by the end of summer then…. its on.
punaise @ 78
Now that one catches my attention. Punster. ;0)
punaise @ 89
Is that what that is called? I used to work with a guy that would walk into the room singing a song like that and then leave, just to infect everyone with it.
Ear worm. Good stuff.
Petrocelli @ 84
It is about the money — but it is about doing something better than breaking even, both in terms of profit and in terms of non-monetary inputs, regardless of the energy source.
That $300 trillion dollars of oil may be worth that now, but what if it cost 500 trillion to actually find it, drill or mine it, extract and refine it? Hence the oil sands still not tapped as a source of oil. (edit: I neglected to point out that current cost estimates don’t generally take ecological remediation into consideration, either.)
I agree that our engineers have a wealth of ingenuity — but they are also limited by financial realities. Look at the multitude of fuel cell types that have been developed, and how few are actually commercialized; the technology simply doesn’t reach a point where creating the energy is cheaper than the current market price of the energy.
randiego @ 90
Spew alert!
… tee hee …
randiego @ 94
in this case, it’s the dreaded 8-track tape worm.
I hope you are right and I am wrong. I am very pessimistic about how technology is abused for private wealth.
The worst scenario is that Exxon, GE, Halliburton etc. will create a monopoly with renewables the way they do now with everything.
JFK and Illinois.
Nixon has long been credited with intense patriotism for not draggin the country through an investigation into vote countin in Chicago..
Turns out that he was ready to demand an investigation until someone pointed out that an investigation would also uncover the gooper cheating all over the rest of the state- so Nixon folded his tent and went home.
We know a lot more about Lieberman now, than we did before. ;0)
Gore picked Lieberman because he figured he had to take Florida and that Lieberman could do it.
punaise @ 89
How do you make it stop?
Phoenix Woman I liked the way you said “he passed over to the other side”. No one No one can prove or disprove what happens when one passes, and I do believe the sprit does not die. Thank the heavens for people like Steve Gilliard.
In response to last post on the upcoming libby sentence.
Serving “abroad” not serving “abroad” who gives a flying “Cheney”. Libby, Fleisher, Rove, Cheney, Novak, all outed an undercover agent whose job it was to follow the path and sales of WMD’s (what the Bush administration said they were after in Iraq) in who knows (someone knows) what countries.
My 19 year old daughter (home from college) is trying really hard to understand why people who steal from service stations do more time in
jail than people who out an undercover agent who has put her onwn life on the line to protect National Security.
Can anyone explain to her why? (Walton, Fitz, Comey) Can anyone explain to her why our justice system operates like this. As Alana has said “that sure does not sound like justice to me”
rwcole @ 73
rwcole is right. Like all hydrogen schemes, this is really an energy storage scheme, not an energy generation scheme. The energy that appears to come from the hydrogen is actually, at the end of the day, paid for by energy required for the reduction of alumina oxide.
A written link from Purdue describing some of the details is here.
Kathleen
It’s the golden rule– thems whats got the gold makes the rules.
Petrocelli @ 88
LOL!
Hydrogen query: Do I take it that they’re talking about a process to chemically produce hydrogen from source materials on the spot, in what passes for a gas tank, and then immediately burning it to power your car? If so, this could be exciting.
Because the model most people think of with hydrogen, essentially filling a tank with it like you fill a tank with gas, is simply bullshit. Won’t work. Check out this article for a full analysis.
One example: hydrogen tends to blow up. Remember the Hindenburg in 1938? We’ve all seen the pictures, and we don’t want that to be happening on our highways several times every day, especially if it’s your car. Pressure tanks strong enough to resist bursting in a crash would be so heavy they’d be uneconomical, both in money and in energy.
So is this story really a breakthrough?
Frank33 @ 98
I look at the shifting corporate ownership vis a vis the I.T. companies, as the future of corporate citizenship. Most of those companies, certainly the most successful ones, treat their employees better than unions even dreamt possible.
The future is bright … reality is peace, prosperity and bliss. Halliburton and its ilk will be Dinosaurs in less than 50 years.
If my choice for president, Mr. Gore doesn’t run, let me say this, we have some mighty fine Democratic candidates, one of whom will be in the Oval Office come January 2009.
I think that Chavez’ man calling Condi out is good news!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..venezuela/
Steve T. @ 107
The Hindenburg’s fire was not caused by Hydrogen, it was as a result of the paint that was used, which was highly flammable. When Hydrogen burns, it is invisible.
newspaperbrat @ 106
RE-ELECT AL GORE!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 109
Agreed, but it would be nice if the most qualified person actually gets the job this time …
solai @ 87
Who do you think will be the final dem candidate?
“Hammersmith Palais, The Bolshoi Ballet,
Jump Back In The Alley, and Nanny Goats.”
“Yes, yes, Dear dear, perhaps next year, or maybe even now,
In Which Case…..KICK ASS SAX BREAK”
Ian Drury, sadly missed.
newspaperbrat @ 106
It was actually to make PW or Rayne spew, but no comments from either of them so far … *g*
Petrocelli @ 113
what happened to pelosi 07?
I was surprised to come over here and see no mention [or blogging] of the “debate” on CNN on “Faith & Politics.” Edwards was up first, then Obama and Hillary’s up now. The “minor players” will be up next hour.
It’s pretty good: each candidate is up by him/herself for 15 minutes only. Questioned by moderator, and then questions by “panel” of faith folks [who are actually pretty good]. I’m assuming it will be rerun.
Addendum: I went to an Edwards fundraiser this afternoon. He was wonderful, Elizabeth was terrific. I am more committed to him than ever.
SnarKassandra @ 117
I would like Pelosi to be the next President but that’s looking increasingly unlikely.
Phoenix Woman @ 6
Is this eastern time?
Petro: I’ll grant that once the fire was going much of the dramatic flame and smoke might have come from burning paint. But did the paint start the fire, or was it the hydrogen? More precisely, some source of ignition, whether an accidental spark or actual sabotage, that then set off the hydrogen which set off the paint, and so on.
Shouldn’t we resolve this before betting our economy – and our lives – on the question?
John Edwards/Wesley Clark.
Unless Gore DOES get in.
The firm belief here is that Gore will run. And the certainity is that he will trounce anyone the GOP throws at us.
Elliott @ 91
The Boston Globe, home of Charlie Savage, has decent moments.
I maintain optimal support for our Speaker.
Steve T. @ 121
It has alrady been documented that Hydrogen is a safe energy source that will not explode as you think it will.
BMW has done lots of tests on this. I’m going to have dinner or I would find the articles for you.
Here’s a hint … if the Europeans are actively plugging Hydrogen as the best alternative to internal combustion engines … they know with 100% certainty that it’s safe.
A little more science to be cheerful about:
Whatever the cause of homosexuality, be it genetic, hormonal, or even sociological, the result is a change somewhere in the brain.
This change is physical and permanent, prayer to the contrary.
I’ve been on the Gore bandwagon for quite a while now
randiego @ 90
Late to the party, but * c h o k e *
Only in The Donald’s mind, and I’ve no desire to go in there to confirm it.
punaise @ 127
Which instrument do you play?
I like Edwards, Clark, Dodd and some others. Last night I was impressed with Biden.
Loo Hoo. @ 110
That picture of Condi “mushroom cloud” Rice tells it all.
“I am quite certain that it would be difficult for any commission to debate more fully, to criticize more fully the policies of the United States government than is done every night on CNN, on ABC, on CBS, on NBC and on any number of smaller channels,” she said.
Jeepers all you had to do was watch the MSM for six months before the invasion to see how fair and balanced our MSM was (and some continue to be). Can you say “kiss ass, roll over, complacent, complicit” The MSM has its own collective souls bloodied by the “war of choice” that they did very little to challenge anything the Bush administration was repeating.
Condi if you have not noticed no one is listening to the Bush administrations lectures about Democracy or good examples.
SnarKassandra @ 129
the Democratic bass.
The fossil fuel industry sees “hydrogen” as the gasoline of the future- why? It can be freed using coal- and we’ve got LOTS of coal. Of course if we use coal to create the electricity to free the hydrogen- well we are using a VERY dirty process- one that after billions we still don’t know how to clean- but the coal companies figure that if gas gets to $10 per gallon- no one will give a shit.
The view here is that it’s critical to deny the Republicans the WH in 2008.
Petro: Enjoy your dinner. I would like to get links to those articles when you have some free time. I’m not a chemist, but on Wednesday I’m going to visit family in California, and my dad is a chemist. Retired organic research chemist for Standard Oil, no less. Might be interesting to discuss this with him.
Photo voltaics. It’s the new-old wave.
PLovering @ 127
You want to back this up with a scientific link?
I thought Hillary was clear, commanding, so so intelligent, warm. I really like when she kept saying to Wolf that the “hypothetical” scenarios that he insisted on asking “what if Iran will not stop enriching (at the level that is legal by IAEA standards) fuel? Would you be willing to take more serious action?”
Wolf kept asking everyone to raise their hands on these “hypothetical” scenarios and Hillary politely shut him down several times.
I just wish she had come out early and taken responsibility for a very bad (she did not read the 90 page NIE report) 2002 war resolution vote. This issue is going to sink her ship, and Al Gore knows it.
Keith in da house!
I will suppport the nominee of my party for the next new Democratic president.
OT, but very interesting program coming up on C-SPAN 3 right now (8 pm Eastern)-history of Tianenman Sqare uprising. SnK, you may benefit from this background.
rwcole @ 133
Coal is bad. Hydrogen is good.
Obama’s health care plan discussion upstairs.
FYI, new thread
Conyers Requests Palast’s “Vote Caging” Evidence
on Truthout
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/060407R.shtml
Steve T. @ 107
Hydrogen doesn’t blow up, it burns. to explode, it’s needs to be mixed with Oxygen in a near-perfect ratio. the real problem is, like all gasious fuels it has to be stored under pressure. and pressurized tanks, while not blowing up most of the time, either, tend to emit a stream of gas when pierced, which produces recoil, etc … so hydrogen tanks need to be a lot more stable than gas tanks. read : more weight. less than a lead battery, though.
Yes, greenwarrior, eastern. We have to up and slapping em at 6:30.
Here is a reason to be cheerful!
At Jewish Telegraphic Agency
Poll: U.S. Arabs, Jews agree on peace
Majorities of Arab and Jewish Americans want the U.S. government to press harder for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israel’s occupation of the West Bank to end.
A poll commissioned jointly by Americans for Peace Now and the Arab American Institute found that 65 percent of American Jews and 89 percent of Arab Americans believe it is “important” for Israel to end its occupation.
Asked about a “negotiated peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians that included the establishment of an independent, secure Palestinian state alongside an independent, secure Israeli state, and resolved final status issues of Jerusalem, refugees, and borders,” 87 percent of Jewish respondents registered support as did 94 percent of Arab-American respondents.
The sides were in virtual agreement on President Bush’s handling of the conflict, with 80 percent of Jewish respondents and 77 percent of Arab Americans deeming it “not effective.”
Perceptions do not match the reality, the poll found: Only 34 percent of Jewish respondents believed Arab Americans favored a secure Israel, while only 60 percent of Arab Americans believed Jews wanted a secure Palestinian state. The sponsors of the poll, carried out by Zogby International, said that underscored the need for education and working together, and to end “pandering” by politicians that exacerbates differences.
“We need to challenge politicians to be responsible in how they approach us,” said AAI President James Zogby.
APN President Debra DeLee said, “It’s incumbent upon us and others to get the message out.”
The May 22-23 telephone poll reached 501 Jewish Americans and 501 Arab Americans. It had a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points.
greenwarrior @ 120
Yep – so we left coasters must remember to set our alarm clock a bit early and well worth it!
Good News! Israel sending out feelers for talks with Syria
http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iow…..peace.html
In Reuel Marc Gerecht’s most recent article at National Review “Dangerous Illusions” he sounded reasonable for a few minutes until I got to this sentence “There is an argument for this, given the essential European role in imposing serious sanctions against an Iran that is pursuing nuclear weaponry.”
Where is the proof Reuel, the verifiable proof to back up your unsubstantiated and endlessly repeated claims about Iran’s “alleged” nuclear weapons program?
Reuel sounds far less cocky than he usually does. This is good news!
http://www.weeklystandard.com/…..8ftjdn.asp
Kagan not sounding happy about the Bush administration leaning towards the Iraq Study Group findings …more good news!
http://www.weeklystandard.com/…..3qdgkh.asp
Well, as usual, a dollar short and a day late but what the hell.The passing of steve gilliard is a tragedy on alot of level and the more I have been thinking about all that he did during his way too short time here, It came to me that just possibly we could all be reminded of his unyielding intelligent commentaries on an ongoing basis.
How about establishing a yearly award that would be given to the person whose work over the previous year represented what Steve stood for. And it could be called – “The Gilly”!
Details could be worked out later. Anyone care to comment?
billjpa
We often wonder here about the future of news coverage– having been part of the Libby Trial event! Here’s an interesting take on the evolution in news coverage that is now in process:
. He writes about ‘citizen journalism’ the way we have talked about it.
He has some interesting things to say about the blogosphere at his #7. If you read it, go over to NewsTrust, and review the article.
Bob in HI
SnarKassandra @ 117
I think her lustre has faded due to the Dems kissing up to Bush too much and failing to put a crimp in the Preznit’s war plans. According to ABC, the Dems popularity has shrunk in recent months. I think its due to being too palsy-walsy with Bush on war funding and immigration, and the failure to remove Gonzo from office after digging up so much dirt on him. In other words, too much whining, and too little action.
Bob in HI
PLovering @ 127
This generalization is too sweeping. It may be true for some, perhaps many, but I am very much in doubt that it is the case for all. I noticed that you make the claim as a bald assertion with no link to supporting evidence.
Personally, I think it is a good thing when people fall in love with, and make a commitment to care for, each other– no matter what their size, shape, or polarity is.
Bob in HI
punaise @ 133
I thought that’s who we were playing *to*. But then maybe we’re *it*!
Bob in HI
PS I didn’t “get it” until I realized it came from punaise.
I bought a little 45 rpm of ‘Reasons to be Cheerful’ at a school carnival in Kingston, Ontario in about 1986! I thought his last name was Drury…swear that was how it was spelled on the record label. Anyway…. Reasons to be cheerful, 1-2-3!!
Bob Schacht @ 158
no strings attached!
Elizabeth De la Vargas at Anti war.com
“Has Libby learned nothing” “Sentencing for Dummies”
http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=11071
The thing about the aluminum and gallium is crap. There is very little gallium in the world compared to what would be needed. Right now supplies are squeezed by the need for lead solder replacements and Gallium for Gallium nitride and Gallium arsenide LEDs.
Steve T. @ 136
I had read some information a while back from BMW & other European companies regarding Hydrogen powered vehicles, where they say safety exceeds gas tanks of today. Perhaps you can google “safe hydrogen” and follow the links. Greencarcongress and physorg have a lot of information … enjoy the hunt.
Plug- in hybrids will be the next step, for 25 cents of electricity, your car will run for 40 miles. Fuel Cells are also promising. Honda is running tests with units installed in homes that will create energy from natural gas for fuel cell vehicles.
What is most needed is an administration that is not in the pocket of the oil and coal industries.
My feeling is, when Gore is anointed President, he will create a program similar to the Apollo Space program and kick- start the shift to renewable energy. But they can install enough windmills and solar panels to offset a large percentage of carbon emissions … and they have not begun to tap the vast potential of conservation.
… I’m even more long winded when it comes to the promise of Stem Cells … *g*
dakine01 @ 12
Yes, long race to run.
But it’s SO terribly hard to feel good if it’s not resolved during our time in the flesh, though.
Danged difficult to accept, THAT one is.
Always hard to accept this thing.
No matter HOW much we study history, or read, or have info from millineum to millineum . . .
We still want to get it done in OUR lifetime.
I never dreamt, post Nixon, it could possibly get worse. Despite all the sci-fi and all the non-fictioin and truth presented, I never really believed Big Brother could beat us.
Now, I fight myself to accept that it’s a long term battle, just like in every sci-fi book or historical narrative ever created, posits.
Generation after generation upon one another.
Dependent on the predecessor to leave SOMETHING to believe in, something to fight for.
So, at 54, time to quit whining, and figger out what to leave, I guess.
I still got an edge, and some music, maybe they will suffice for my contribution.
TeddySanFran @ 19
This is tough for me, don’t know enuff.
I live in Vientienne as a youngster. My pops helped COUNTLESS Hmong get out from the Pathet Lao massacre’s.
Wonder what this is all about . . . more proof, yer past never leaves ya . . . . . sigh.
selise @ 34
Phreakin surrender monkey jive party.
Squandered it all, like a grasshopper.
No matter how Iraq goes, at this rate, Pub’s WILL hang it on the Dem’s.
Someone call me when Pelosi punches BoyKing, THAT will get my attention . . .
Eureka Springs @ 138
Discovery Magazine, June 2007:
“Born Gay” by Michael Abrams
Bob Schacht @ 157
This research applies to homosexual men only, not lesbians.
There are interesting correlations between gay men and straight women, and their common attractions for the male sex.
Petrocelli @ 108
We don’t HAVE 50 years. In less than 5 years, they will have a death grip on us forever, if they already don’t have one.
this is the kind of stuff i used to think all had to be crackpots:
Fla. Man Invents Machine To Turn Water Into Fire,
but now this twenty-first century is turning out to be more and more your futuristic science fiction, so who knows?
you make the call.
This is a blow.
Hope is the best tool we have in our arsenal. I don’t think civil rights workers had much else back in the day. So in honor of them and Steven Gilliard and anyone who fought the good fight, we owe them a debt of gratitude.