<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate Rehash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:19:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738711</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738711</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently Hillary likes the Global War on Terror slogan and would like to take it for a test drive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Hillary likes the Global War on Terror slogan and would like to take it for a test drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738059</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We SHOULD give Edwards a point for saying “War on Terror” is a bumper-sticker slogan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For which utterance (ahem) Hillary INSTANTLY bashed him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We SHOULD give Edwards a point for saying “War on Terror” is a bumper-sticker slogan.</p>
<p>For which utterance (ahem) Hillary INSTANTLY bashed him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanbark</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738053</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738053</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Murder @ 315:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good post.  If Edwards thinks that the hard-charging regulatory zeal of the STATES are the answer to corporate excesses, let’s DO move him to the “B” list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had been leaning his way, but I’m flooding other compartments and starting to correct the “list”, as we speak.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jukesgrrrl @ 316:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   “Tucker Carlson, their lovechild.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you send the new, keyboard, please have it be coffee-proof.  :o)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Murder @ 315:</p>
<p>Good post.  If Edwards thinks that the hard-charging regulatory zeal of the STATES are the answer to corporate excesses, let’s DO move him to the “B” list.</p>
<p>I had been leaning his way, but I’m flooding other compartments and starting to correct the “list”, as we speak.  :o)</p>
<p>Jukesgrrrl @ 316:</p>
<p>   “Tucker Carlson, their lovechild.”</p>
<p>When you send the new, keyboard, please have it be coffee-proof.  :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myrtle june</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738045</link>
		<dc:creator>myrtle june</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-738045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Big Mitch… “What was she thinking?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right there is where she’s posturing for the A I P A C and “9/11 terrr terr fear fear” crowd. Its a plank she needs to try and endorse, under the table, the neocon “defense” industry. HUGE HUGE HUGE error. HUGE. Republican.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Mitch… “What was she thinking?”</p>
<p>Right there is where she’s posturing for the A I P A C and “9/11 terrr terr fear fear” crowd. Its a plank she needs to try and endorse, under the table, the neocon “defense” industry. HUGE HUGE HUGE error. HUGE. Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737900</link>
		<dc:creator>jwc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought Phil Leotardo made a convincing case for his ascendancy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Phil Leotardo made a convincing case for his ascendancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monk</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737873</link>
		<dc:creator>Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-737757&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;spiderpaws @ 323&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;…it’s hard to forget how good things were when the Clintons ran the show. And they now know so much more. Hillary as president would be an astounding thing and having Bill with her, well, we could not do better. Experience, sophistication, brains, diplomacy, compassion and they are eager to give it another shot. Only Gore would as good.&lt;br /&gt;
Consider ourselves lucky that they would be willing to do this very hard job again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They may have all the brains and diplomacy&lt;br /&gt;
but all we are going to hear 24/7 is Monica, Vince Foster, Whitewater, Travelgate. That it was a right wing witch hunt no longer matters to me. I don’t want to hear it anymore. Enough already. It’s time to move on. They don’t have special dibs on the Oval Office.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-737757"><em>spiderpaws @ 323</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>…it’s hard to forget how good things were when the Clintons ran the show. And they now know so much more. Hillary as president would be an astounding thing and having Bill with her, well, we could not do better. Experience, sophistication, brains, diplomacy, compassion and they are eager to give it another shot. Only Gore would as good.<br />
Consider ourselves lucky that they would be willing to do this very hard job again.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They may have all the brains and diplomacy<br />
but all we are going to hear 24/7 is Monica, Vince Foster, Whitewater, Travelgate. That it was a right wing witch hunt no longer matters to me. I don’t want to hear it anymore. Enough already. It’s time to move on. They don’t have special dibs on the Oval Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everythingseemssoneat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737795</link>
		<dc:creator>Everythingseemssoneat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;bin Laden is wanted by the FBI but not for having anything to do with 9/11.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bin Laden is wanted by the FBI but not for having anything to do with 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737788</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737788</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-737045&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;lina @ 162&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-737010&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mr.Murder @ 131&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama kind of ignored the idea of continued moral high ground in prosecution of Bin laden.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe he’s afraid there isn’t enough evidence to convict? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is Osama still not on the FBI ten most wanted list?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe it points to a mossad cell I saw celebrating the towers collapse…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why was  a missile stirke on a building with children the issue, I think jawbreaker knew a time this was the case and Osama been forgotten…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So nice of Blitzer to forget who let Osama go and spin it vs. Dems, he knew what kind of answer Dennis K. would give.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought Osama had been on the list since ‘93.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nope. I don’t think that bin Laden was even under indictment as a co-conspirator until 1999 or thereabouts. And that was after the embassy attacks in Africa.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t think OBL has ever been on an FBI “Most Wanted List”, though. It’s not like he’s here in the USA, or likly to enter the US.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-737045"><em>lina @ 162</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-737010"><em>Mr.Murder @ 131</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Obama kind of ignored the idea of continued moral high ground in prosecution of Bin laden.</p>
<p>Maybe he’s afraid there isn’t enough evidence to convict? </p>
<p>Why is Osama still not on the FBI ten most wanted list?</p>
<p>Maybe it points to a mossad cell I saw celebrating the towers collapse…</p>
<p>Why was  a missile stirke on a building with children the issue, I think jawbreaker knew a time this was the case and Osama been forgotten…</p>
<p>So nice of Blitzer to forget who let Osama go and spin it vs. Dems, he knew what kind of answer Dennis K. would give.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought Osama had been on the list since ‘93.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nope. I don’t think that bin Laden was even under indictment as a co-conspirator until 1999 or thereabouts. And that was after the embassy attacks in Africa.</p>
<p>I don’t think OBL has ever been on an FBI “Most Wanted List”, though. It’s not like he’s here in the USA, or likly to enter the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Mitch</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737773</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hillary won, in my view, but I am very disturbed by her assertion that we are safer now. What was she thinking?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edwards improved, and he is still my favorite. He is honest, and he cares about the poor. He’s the real deal. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama looked good, but no better than expected. I did like when he answered about English only, to the effect that we have to stop asking divisive questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Biden helped himself, but he is still second tier. Ditto for Dodd, though kudos to him for saying he will restore civil rights on day one in office. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Richardson continued the trainwreck he started on Meet the Press. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here in Alaska we know that Gravel is a dangerous joke. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What to watch for: Next week when Wolf does the republican debate, let’s see if he keeps asking candidates to say that the other repugs are “wrong,” as he did with the dems. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please visit the Schapira blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://schapira.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;“What we know so far…”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary won, in my view, but I am very disturbed by her assertion that we are safer now. What was she thinking?</p>
<p>Edwards improved, and he is still my favorite. He is honest, and he cares about the poor. He’s the real deal. </p>
<p>Obama looked good, but no better than expected. I did like when he answered about English only, to the effect that we have to stop asking divisive questions.</p>
<p>Biden helped himself, but he is still second tier. Ditto for Dodd, though kudos to him for saying he will restore civil rights on day one in office. </p>
<p>Richardson continued the trainwreck he started on Meet the Press. </p>
<p>Here in Alaska we know that Gravel is a dangerous joke. </p>
<p>What to watch for: Next week when Wolf does the republican debate, let’s see if he keeps asking candidates to say that the other repugs are “wrong,” as he did with the dems. </p>
<p>Please visit the Schapira blog, <a href="http://schapira.blogspot.com">“What we know so far…”</a></p>
<p><em>… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoes4Industry</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737762</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoes4Industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/03/debate-rehash/#comment-737762</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-737757&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;spiderpaws @ 323&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;…it’s hard to forget how good things were when the Clintons ran the show. And they now know so much more. Hillary as president would be an astounding thing and having Bill with her, well, we could not do better. Experience, sophistication, brains, diplomacy, compassion and they are eager to give it another shot. Only Gore would as good.&lt;br /&gt;
Consider ourselves lucky that they would be willing to do this very hard job again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“A snowball’s chance in Hell” = Hillary’s chances of being elected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-737757"><em>spiderpaws @ 323</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>…it’s hard to forget how good things were when the Clintons ran the show. And they now know so much more. Hillary as president would be an astounding thing and having Bill with her, well, we could not do better. Experience, sophistication, brains, diplomacy, compassion and they are eager to give it another shot. Only Gore would as good.<br />
Consider ourselves lucky that they would be willing to do this very hard job again.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“A snowball’s chance in Hell” = Hillary’s chances of being elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
