<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GOP&#8217;s White Knight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:05:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynic</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-733907</link>
		<dc:creator>cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-733907</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, but who are the Dems gonna run who can win? Hillary….universal health care…..I love it. But she already got shot down on it. And if she agrees with her husband’s policies on trade, I don’t think I want to see her sitting in the chair. Obama? Well, why doesn’t he start to make a little more noise. Say, something to the effect of “the day I take the oath of office, withdrawal from Iraq will begin starting with the men and women who have been there the longest, not on a unit by unit basis, we will take what Iran has been trying to offer, and we’ll actually investigate who blew up the world trade center, no matter where it might lead, even if it leads back to Saudia Arabia or the US. On the day I take office, the fourth Amendment to the Constitution will be restored, and anyone who is found to be violating it will (if it is an agency) face a drastic funding cut (If I have any arm twisting influence in the Congress), and if they are an individual will be looking across the table at someone like Mr. Fitzgerald.”&lt;br /&gt;
No one dares to say that.&lt;br /&gt;
Who have the Dems got?&lt;br /&gt;
Please.&lt;br /&gt;
someone tell me&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, yeah, and “on the day I take office, we will return to an adversarial relationship with the press. And that includes the bloggers. No one gets access to the President in exchange for a favorable story, so take your best shot!”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, but who are the Dems gonna run who can win? Hillary….universal health care…..I love it. But she already got shot down on it. And if she agrees with her husband’s policies on trade, I don’t think I want to see her sitting in the chair. Obama? Well, why doesn’t he start to make a little more noise. Say, something to the effect of “the day I take the oath of office, withdrawal from Iraq will begin starting with the men and women who have been there the longest, not on a unit by unit basis, we will take what Iran has been trying to offer, and we’ll actually investigate who blew up the world trade center, no matter where it might lead, even if it leads back to Saudia Arabia or the US. On the day I take office, the fourth Amendment to the Constitution will be restored, and anyone who is found to be violating it will (if it is an agency) face a drastic funding cut (If I have any arm twisting influence in the Congress), and if they are an individual will be looking across the table at someone like Mr. Fitzgerald.”<br />
No one dares to say that.<br />
Who have the Dems got?<br />
Please.<br />
someone tell me<br />
Oh, yeah, and “on the day I take office, we will return to an adversarial relationship with the press. And that includes the bloggers. No one gets access to the President in exchange for a favorable story, so take your best shot!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mabel&#8217;s Wig Shack</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-733678</link>
		<dc:creator>Mabel&#8217;s Wig Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-733678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;no no no. the issue isn’t asbestos in your kid’s lung.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the issue is &lt;b&gt;federalism&lt;/b&gt;; you know, that really nifty deep-thinker continental congress stuff!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no no no. the issue isn’t asbestos in your kid’s lung.</p>
<p>the issue is <b>federalism</b>; you know, that really nifty deep-thinker continental congress stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee guzzler</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-733637</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee guzzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-733637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like this guy won the most like Ronnie contest. I think he goes down quickly if he aligns himself with “Toxic Tim” Griffin.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like this guy won the most like Ronnie contest. I think he goes down quickly if he aligns himself with “Toxic Tim” Griffin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732555</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732555</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoops.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732541</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-732414&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Helen @ 190&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-732404&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;allan_in_upstate @ 180&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thompson’s involvement with the Libby Defense Trust and his public statements about the case should by themselves  be enough to disqualify him for the Presidency. I would love it if it turns out that he wrote to Judge Walton, but he’s probably smart enough not to have done that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree. When I heard him spewing the Republican talking points about Libby I immediately blew him off as a viable candidate.  He was spewing before it was abundently clear (to all but us, that is) that Valerie was covert.  The question now, I suppose, is how much denial the moderate repubs are in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-732414"><em>Helen @ 190</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-732404"><em>allan_in_upstate @ 180</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Thompson’s involvement with the Libby Defense Trust and his public statements about the case should by themselves  be enough to disqualify him for the Presidency. I would love it if it turns out that he wrote to Judge Walton, but he’s probably smart enough not to have done that.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I agree. When I heard him spewing the Republican talking points about Libby I immediately blew him off as a viable candidate.  He was spewing before it was abundently clear (to all but us, that is) that Valerie was covert.  The question now, I suppose, is how much denial the moderate repubs are in.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732514</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732514</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-732441&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;AnnieW @ 214&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder how Iraq issue will be handled in 2008, especially if Turkey invades the one part that seems to be doing alright after our invasion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/05/31/turkey.iraq.ap/&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/.....y.iraq.ap/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What a mess…at least we know that whoever the Republican candidate is, the entire Iraq mess will be blamed squarely on Clinton and the “surrendercrats”…with a few swipes at Carter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s why Dems should elect someone like John Edwards, who is truly anti-war, in the primary and then in the general election the Republicans should throw up their hands in disgust at their perpetual-war candidate and vote in Edwards by acclamation. Give the Liberals a chance, despite the fact Edwards isn’t so terribly Liberal, and then if things don’t go well they can blame it all on Liberals and ban ‘em from Presidential politics for another 35 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah, toss it to Liberals, they like the really hard problems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-732441"><em>AnnieW @ 214</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I wonder how Iraq issue will be handled in 2008, especially if Turkey invades the one part that seems to be doing alright after our invasion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/05/31/turkey.iraq.ap/">http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/&#8230;..y.iraq.ap/</a></p>
<p>What a mess…at least we know that whoever the Republican candidate is, the entire Iraq mess will be blamed squarely on Clinton and the “surrendercrats”…with a few swipes at Carter.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s why Dems should elect someone like John Edwards, who is truly anti-war, in the primary and then in the general election the Republicans should throw up their hands in disgust at their perpetual-war candidate and vote in Edwards by acclamation. Give the Liberals a chance, despite the fact Edwards isn’t so terribly Liberal, and then if things don’t go well they can blame it all on Liberals and ban ‘em from Presidential politics for another 35 years.</p>
<p>Yeah, toss it to Liberals, they like the really hard problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loo Hoo.</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732505</link>
		<dc:creator>Loo Hoo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732505</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not particularly proud of this, but I’d never heard of Fred Thompson till about 3 weeks ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not particularly proud of this, but I’d never heard of Fred Thompson till about 3 weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonkers</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732503</link>
		<dc:creator>bonkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-732470&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Worried @ 243&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we go to far to the left before the election, we’re screwed.  Think with you’re sense before your heart.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob Shrum, is that you?!?  Hey, I hear Fred “Tommy” Thompson is putting a band together.  You might wanna give him a jingle.  Godspeed, Bob.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-732470"><em>Worried @ 243</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>If we go to far to the left before the election, we’re screwed.  Think with you’re sense before your heart.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bob Shrum, is that you?!?  Hey, I hear Fred “Tommy” Thompson is putting a band together.  You might wanna give him a jingle.  Godspeed, Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732497</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-732403&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;solai @ 179&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Thompson’s core theme is that there is a disconnect between the American people &lt;b&gt;and their rulers&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whoa, that &lt;em&gt;is &lt;/em&gt;offensive. Talk about a disconnect.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did he really say that? Wow!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boy, I hope he was talking about a measuring tape.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-732403"><em>solai @ 179</em></a></p>
<blockquote><blockquote>Thompson’s core theme is that there is a disconnect between the American people <b>and their rulers</b>. </p></blockquote>
<p>Whoa, that <em>is </em>offensive. Talk about a disconnect.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Did he really say that? Wow!</p>
<p>Boy, I hope he was talking about a measuring tape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732491</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/06/01/the-gops-white-knight/#comment-732491</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-732487&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;CD @ 254&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;HuffPo columnist Chris Kelley has this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kelly/fred-thompson-a-looming-_b_50255.html&quot;&gt;observation&lt;/a&gt; about Thompson…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously I’m missing something when it comes to the awesome charisma of Fred Thompson. Some of my problem is aesthetic. It’s those papery little plastic surgery cat scratch wrinkles on his cheeks. The first person I ever noticed them on was Gore Vidal, and I figured he must have had his facelift sometime around when Aaron Burr died, so he had an excuse. The science was in its infancy. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Fred Thompson is only 64. And his facelift looks like it cost less than John Edwards’ haircut. What kind of message does that send?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That he’s in touch with the common man?  No fancy-schmancy expensive facelifts for Good Ol’ Fred!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-732487"><em>CD @ 254</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>HuffPo columnist Chris Kelley has this <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kelly/fred-thompson-a-looming-_b_50255.html">observation</a> about Thompson…</p>
<blockquote><p>Obviously I’m missing something when it comes to the awesome charisma of Fred Thompson. Some of my problem is aesthetic. It’s those papery little plastic surgery cat scratch wrinkles on his cheeks. The first person I ever noticed them on was Gore Vidal, and I figured he must have had his facelift sometime around when Aaron Burr died, so he had an excuse. The science was in its infancy. </p>
<p>But Fred Thompson is only 64. And his facelift looks like it cost less than John Edwards’ haircut. What kind of message does that send?</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>That he’s in touch with the common man?  No fancy-schmancy expensive facelifts for Good Ol’ Fred!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.250 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-16 23:06:41 -->

