By age 18, Kelvin already had tried twice, unsuccessfully, to cross into the United States after traveling hundreds of miles from his home in Honduras. The first time, he said, he was beaten and his backpack taken by thieves.
“Mi,” who was robbed while riding atop a train on his way to the United States, lived for five years in Texas before being deported because his work permit expired.
Both Kelvin and Mi laughed when asked if they could support themselves on the salary offered by the vast maquiladora (maquila) network of factories stretching throughout Central America.
“I worked two jobs in Texas, at the 7–Eleven and the Stop & Go,” Mi said. “I could make more money working two jobs in Texas than I can at the maquila.” Yet work in the maquilas is the best most Central American countries have to offer.
And despite the risks, both intended to keep trying to get into the United States, crossing the guarded borders of two nations until they succeeded—or were killed.
I met Mi and Kelvin several years ago at the Casa del Migrante, a temporary shelter for deported migrants on the Guatemalan-Mexican border. Just south of the Suchiate River in Tecun Uman, the shelter is run by the Scalabrini Order of Roman Catholic priests whose mission is providing shelters for the migrants among us. The labor-human rights trip was sponsored through STITCH, a network of U.S. women unionists and activists seeking to build connections between Central American and U.S. women organizing for economic justice.
Filing in for lunch in a sweltering, dark room where fat flies were the first to feast on the bowls of rice, meat and greenish bread, dozens of migrants took their places, saying grace before they ate. They shared their stories and their hopes.
Across the room, a man from El Salvador described how he had migrated to the United States and earned enough money to come back and build a house—which was destroyed in a hurricane. With nothing left in El Salvador, he was trying to return to the United States to start the process all over again.
While the debate over who can enter the United States roils the nation, the priests at Casa del Migrante know that no matter how onerous the bureaucratic loops to citizenship or how high the borders erected along the Rio Grande, people seeking to support themselves and their families will continue to risk everything to—in a word—survive.
Maquilas—the system of factories where workers assemble garments for multinational firms like Liz Claiborne—were supposed to provide a place for impoverished workers to step into the global economy as well-paid participants. Instead, workers often face sweatshop conditions and universally long hours and low pay. Working 12 hours a day, six days a week, many throughout Mexico and Central America can only afford to live in cardboard and aluminum homes with no electricity or running water.
Many of the maquilas throughout Central America are owned by Korean or Taiwanese firms, whose Latino employees assemble clothes and other goods for exports to the United States and other western nations.
Corporate globalization hasn’t succeeded in enabling millions of workers throughout the world to support their families. But it has succeeded in tying together national economies—and that means if workers are treated unfairly in one country, it’s a problem for all nations. These connections are especially clear in recent so-called free trade agreements.
Says Dr. Gabriela Lemus, executive director of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), an AFL-CIO constituency group:
Within the framework of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for example, productivity has increased in all three countries affected, simultaneously, average wages in all three countries have dropped on average by approximately 30 percent. In the case of the relationship between Mexico and the United States, in the 1970s, for every $3 earned by an American workers, a Mexican worker earned $1—today for every $6 earned by an American worker, a Mexican worker earns one. The insistence of policymakers to not explore the inter-relationships of globalization, international trade policy and immigration has created a quagmire for immigrants and the communities in which they live.
Instead, with its “guest worker” provision, the current immigration proposal now in Congress would create a 21st century version of the nation’s failed bracero program in which tens of thousands of immigrants were exploited for use by greedy corporations in the mid-20th century.
Sen. Byron Dorgan neatly sums up the guest worker provision:
It is, simply put, a plan that would bring cheap labor in the back door in the form of millions of foreign workers, even as we continue to export good paying American jobs to other countries.
As drafted, the immigration proposal also would go against decades of U.S. immigration policy by separating families. (Pach has a great post on the bill’s lack of family reunification and more here.) This month, Asian Pacific Americans held a two-day rally on Capitol Hill to urge Congress to “Keep Families Together” and reject President Bush’s proposal to eliminate the family reunification provision. The Asian Pacific American National Mobilization was separate from the nationwide May Day demonstration staged by Latino groups, but other activist Asian American groups joined the nationwide May 1 immigration rallies in major cities across the nation. The AFL-CIO constituency group, the Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance (APALA) was among the participants. The AFL-CIO opposes both the provision that would create a guest worker program and separate families.
Back in Guatemala, the Rev. Ademar Barilli, who heads Casa del Migrante, told me he had seen more than 4,600 people come through his doors since the shelter’s founding in 1995 and 2001. By 2005, some 16,000 people passed through Casa del Migrante that year alone, up from 14,400 the year before, even though the freight train to the border—the migrants’ primary means of transport—stopped running after Hurricane Stan devastated Guatemala in October.
Surviving on donations and support from his religious order, the Brazilian-born priest says he tries to convince people not to go to the United States.
But as long as one day’s wages in the United States is the same as a month’s here, you can’t convince anyone.
At Casa del Migrante that afternoon several years ago, Kelvin, who planned to try crossing both borders again the next day, knew what he wanted to do if he made it to the United States:
Work hard, help my family and buy a Harley.
Now, that’s American.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Tula!
zed
ZED!
Great post Tula! I think it really brings home the problem with the Senate bill. Your critique of guest worker programs jives with what we said in http://www.drummajorinstitute…….php?ID=45
Beats me what ought to be done about immigration.
Sending all the undocumented workers home won’t work.
Lettin whoever wants in to come in doesn’t seem practical.
Status quo is too unpopular to continue..
What do ya do?
Oy vey….
ooooh. better hope Lou Dobbs doesnt see this. he could have a stroke!
Great post Tula. Too often this debate is dehumanized with terms like “illegals”. It’s important that we continue tell people like Kelvin’s story.
Trying to catch up!
What a treasure I believe Mandrake posted of Gore’s speeches. Last Sunday on Chris Matthews Howard Fineman said that word has it that Gore will declare in the fall. This was from the “tell me somthing I don’t know” segment. Matthews came back to Finemans comments about Gore several times.
RUN AL RUN! You all ready won once and we promise to run right behind you!
http://www.netrootsmass.net/page25/page25.html
Why are people so scared of immigrants anyway? 3 of my friends came from Mexico and they’re great. So are their families.
Change must start with campaign finance reform: we need some means to exclude corporate money from governmental decisions. Without that the corporations will insist on maintaining things so that they have a pool of impoverished labor, as well as driving down wages in the U.S.
I know it sounds like a pipe dream, but it’s really where we have to start.
Oh, and, yes, an excellent article, Tula. But it does need a jump!
There’s that word again
NAFTA
Spits on ground.
Re-elect Al in ‘08.
People are going to continue to try to bypass immigration regulations and attempt to get into this country as long as the pay differential is as large as it is.
So we’ve got to decide if we’re OK with that or if we want to restrict the flow- if we decide to restrict the flow- then we need to start with employers- any other approach is doomed to failure. Of course many of th employers are average americans hiring cleaning people, and landscape maintainence people, etc. I don’t think we have the will to do a serious crackdown and we for damned sure aren’t gonna send all the current undocumented workers “home”.
I suspect that we’re kinda fucked here and there will be much politics played but not much will really happen despite the gnashing of teeth.
rwcole @ 5
Its an important question. I know that the think tank I work for put together a two part litmus test to see whether proposed immigration legislation would help the American middle class and all the people working their way into the middle class. http://www.drummajorinstitute.org/library/35.html.
There is a way to build an immigration policy that works for all of us. Certainly addressing the trade crisis that contributes to the current situation is key (gooooo Tula!).
Elana from DMI @ 4
Thanks, Elana. Good to hear from you. DMI has done great work on the immigration issue.
rwcole @ 14
I know we’re kinda fucked. I’ve tried a lot thought experiments. Every angle that I’ve tried to come at the problem from, I run into the same thing, base human nature. Civilization is truly a thin veneer.
Tula, once again, thanks for your work.
You are a treasure at the Lake.
Julia @ 8
Thanks, Julia. It really makes a difference when you can sit down and talk with the migrants and see how hard they are trying to improve their lives and the lives of their families.
Would be interesting to see how the latin americans who come to this country compare to those who stay in latin america. One would suppose that we’re getting the underclass- but the most adventurous of that underclass. Probably an interesting gene pool.
rwcole @ 20
My friend Sandi’s family came when she and her brother got kicked out of school in Mexico cause they are 7th day adventist and they wouldn’t pledge to the flag there.
rwcole @ 20
Probably like a lot of the ancestors of the rest of us.
A good post by brent at No Quarter with a reply by SusanUnPC
spurious- Yeah- I was thinking that too.
One, I think those that are here illegally ought to HAVE to go home and file the paperwork to come here legally.
Sorry, no amnesty — amnesty is just a slap in the face to those who have done things the right way.
Two, companies who have hired those who are illegal immigrants should have to pay for those immigrants to return to their home country — and should be required to hold their position open for them until they are permitted to return to the US.
rwcole @ 20
Umm…err…
I would be very careful about distinguishing economic class (wealth or lack thereof) from biology and biological variables.
There is a project here..we are under North America..but check out the other places..no answers..but a little background..notice the ages of the interviewers..
http://memory.loc.gov/learn/fe…..rv/toc.php
Kirk
I don’t understand your comment. I said that we are probably getting the poorer portion of the Latin American population.
I also said that OF the poorer portion- we’re getting the risk takers.
Do you disagree with any of that?
Is there a genetic predisposition to risk taking? I would be surprised if there were not.
“El Norte”. How many employers of illegal immigrants are fined or jailed?
Much easier to focus on the worker.
The State of Zionism
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070618/klug
SnarKassandra @ 10
Good morning, SnarK!
Its the same principle as being scared of Arabs–
When you think of “them” as “they”, “they” become other– and therefore estranged/strange. But if you get to know them, they become “us”, and are no longer threatening.
The Republican view of the world is to create fear of “them” (whether immigrants, or Arabs, or Reagan’s “welfare mothers” or whomever are the bogeymen of the moment) in order to create solidarity among “us” (non-immigrants and non-Arabs).
I think the best way to deal with the politics of fear is to do what you have done: get to know those “others.” Build bridges of understanding instead of walls of fear.
Bob in HI
Brisingamen @ 25
What right way? For a hungry poor person in Mexico with no relatives who are US citizens, there is effectively no legal way.
We have some hispanic friends who came to the US illegallly decades ago. He worked as a plumber for his entire working life- she managed their money- which quickly grew into a tidy pile. They have five or six sons- each of whom had the opportunity to attend college. They now own several large apartment buildings.. Amazing story- amazing people.
Not all undocumented workers are that clever and disciplined- but many are.
I don’t agree with Corn’s view about Feinstein. I think Feinstein tries to pass the buck.
We are waiting Senator Rockerelller! Phase II of the Senate Select Commmittee on
Intellligence.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs…..pid=200134
Hugh, kathleen, ET:
I left you a message (EPU’d) in Christy’s George Will thread.
This is a great post. It’s important to tell the stories of real people’s lives like this.
Thanks so much, Tula. Policy means people.
rwcole @ 28
Hi rw, I sure agree the folks motivated to face the terror and ardors of migrating to the US without documents are not likely to be the wealthy or the middle classes.
And novelty seeking/risk-taking seemes to have genetic components.
The great difficulty in population-based studies with multiple variables [violent oppression (based on: gender identification, ethnicity, culture, gender, religious orientation, political orientation, sexual orientation); spousal/ familial abuse; racism, etc…] for human decision-making is simply the number of variables.
That’s why I’m so leery of positing genetic factors as a biolgical basis in complex social decisions.
I’m not clever enough to figure out how to control for all the other variables.
MSNBC is reporting that British Academics are considering a boycott of Israel over the damage that has been done to the Palestinian people. Can’t link from here, sorry.
Hear me, OKK?
Such a difficult topic. To me, it all comes down to pecking order and territory. We are all the product of the earth separated by artificial borders, visible or invisible. Animal nature.
spurious @ 22
Okay, who else thought of “Stripes”?
Part of the equation that’s lost here is that the estimated 12 million ‘undocumented workers’ that are here is a static number, it’s not. How does 100 million sound? 200 million? Unless or until employers get slapped it’s a possibilty.
spurious @ 32
I know Somalis here in Columbus, Ohio that didn’t have a dime when they arrived, but they filed the proper paperwork and got their green cards.
If it were up to me, I’d have the US companies and agri-business apply to the State Department for a permit to hire guest-workers, and then the company would go down to Central and South America, hire folks there, and bring them back. Wouldn’t cost the workers a dime.
Wonderful article, Tula. Difficult subject.
Hi everyone.
I tried to address this issue on my site-but a word of explanation. I use the term “illegals” solely to differentiate between immigrants here illegally versus legally. There is no attempt to dehumanize anyone-I purposely avoided using the term “aliens” for just that reason-they’re not aliens, they’re people. Having said that, here’s what I think we should do:
A Sane Immigration Policy
Kirk
Oh hell no- you could never figure out what the genetic basis IS- but there probably IS one- which means that at least to some extent a nation of immigrants will have a slightly different genetic pool than a nation NOT so constituted.
It’s at least intriguing.
There will never be a solution to “immigration”. The people’s of the earth migrate continuously as the population of the world multiplies continuously. It has always been that way. I read somewhere that there are more people alive on earth today than have ever died!
Elena, thanks for closing the circle.
“Trade crisis” – love that phrase.
Congrats to the wordsmith.
And Tula, good on ‘ya for fighting the Trade fight.
The only thing we have to fear from the Trade crisis is losing our jobs, industries, national wealth – and our health.
Thanks for fighting back.
kirk murphy @ 37
Nobody is. Any self-described expert doing more than idly speculating on the role of genetic factors in social interactions is either selling a book or writing a grant proposal.
FYI, New thread
LS #46,
Not true. There are around 5.5-6 billion people on Earth today. From the prelude to Arthur C.Clarke’s “2001: A Space Odyssey“:
“Behind every man now alive stand thirty ghosts, for that is the ratio by which the dead outnumber the living. Since the dawn of time, roughly a hundred billion humans have walked planet Earth.”
The ratio has changed since ‘68, but the number is still way down.
This article is an excellent example of how the ideas of a fence or troops on the border, or whatever else they have in store for us will be little more than another massive federal boondoggle.
People want to come to this country, and listening to people like Lou Dobbs, you’d think that immigration was the cause of every single evil in the world.
What nonsense.
Some further reading if you’re interested:
“The Immigration Scam”
http://www.populistamerica.com…..ation_scam
RonD @ 50
That’s cool! Like I said, I just read it somewhere.
RW, I sure agree – population genetics just amaze me. Tracing the history of our species around the globe and across time from the outliine of our genes..just incredible.
Bearclaw
Love it.
Are you in academia – that insight is just perfect?
Brisingamen @ 42
The number of people permitted on immigration visas varies by country, and also by category (immediate family member, refugee, etc.). The waiting time for a non-refugee applicant with no immediate family who are US citizens to obtain a green card might be decades long.
US government status quo, “treat the symptom; illegal immigration, not the problem; foreign governmental corporate policies.” The question is how much aid do we the taxpayers provide to the countries whose citizens are illegally crossing our borders? What standards, fines, and obligations are incurred by these countries governments? It seems that Mexico, Central America, Latin America are not sanctioned due to the american (global) corporate duplicity of cheap labor, dirt wages, zero environmental/health regulations and under the table payola to the wink and nod governments complicity. The corporations ultimate goal of destroying american worker wages, benefits, and unions by supporting illegal immigrants and guest worker programs in the US. This will be the downfall of the middle class.
Brisingamen @ 42
So many of those seeking workers are not from large companies. I’d guess they’d require anyone joining them on a trip to the U.S. to pay for the pleasure, rather than the company absorbing the cost. The lure to begin with is cheap labor with no strings attached.
I know this wouldn’t be a short-term help, but it does seem we need to help the home countries so that their residents aren’t quite so desperate for survival.
This, clearly, is a heart-wrenching, no-easy-answer situation that calls for that rare combination of compassion and smarts: wisdom.
Bearpaw @ 48
:~)
The use of religion as an epithet at 12:14 is extremely offensive.
[Mod: got it, thanks]
kirk murphy @ 59
Troll alert.
kirk murphy @ 53
Thanks. I’ve never technically worked in academia, just sorta skirted around the edges a lot. I’ve got a science background and I’ve worked with enough medical genetics researchers to know how badly the topic of genetics is handled in the popular press.
Most sociobiology “theories” would be funny, if people didn’t take them so seriously.
kirk murphy @ 47
I blush. Yer too kind (and feel free to use that phrase freely)
I wish I could afford a Harley, unfortunately I have to pay for my and my families health insurance.
Maybe I can go to Mexico and sneak back in and a couple of years I too can have a Harley.