070e853c-012f-4e32-be45-0f392f1ea284.jpg2853b9a4-dab7-4619-941d-5d797458355d.jpge2846e86-c2ab-4831-9c32-65077b949b41.jpg

Judge Reggie Walton says we get the letters (PDF):

The court has received more than one hundred and fifty sentencing letters in this case, some urging leniency for the defendant and some expressing opprobrium at the defendant's actions and calling for the imposition of a substantial prison sentence.  This large number of sentencing letters, no less than the media's desire to view the letters, is indicative of both the high level of public interest in these proceedings and the weightiness of the underlying charges.  Especially in a case of this nature, the Court must strive to be as transparent as possible without compromising the fairness of the system or the ability of the Court to acquire information relevant and helpful to the sentencing process.  

I do think Marcy is right and the blogosphere could have been helpful in pointing out all the various conflicts of interest that must naturally arise out of all these letters and that it might have been helpful for the court to know these things prior to sentencing, but I'll take it.

We don't know who actually wrote the letters yet, but considering the fact that Fitzgerald says that some were written by "former and current public officials," we can take a few guesses.  All I can say is if I was Scooter I would not hear the words "weightiness of the underlying charges" without thoughts of a future kitted out in orange. 

Oh and BTW, read my lips –  covert under IIPA.  Blathering, delusional wingnuts awakening from years of denial can line up to smooch Valerie Plame's tuchus right here.