The past week was a doozy for President Bush. Paul Wolfowitz finally resigned from his post at the World Bank. But not before his attorney, Bob Bennett, negotiated a cushy landing for him — you'll note that Wolfowitz is staying past the June 1st date required to earn his $400,000.00 longevity bonus, so one wonders if that payment was part of the deal? (Since it was also supposed to be a performance related bonus, it must have been one helluva negotiation if Wolfie's account is about to get fatter.)
Heaven knows that passing the buck on part of the blame to allow Wolfowitz to pretend to save public face was a chunk of it, but how much negotiation on Bennett's part did it really take for the World Bank board to pay the man off after he already knew he'd have to leave in disgrace? Nothing like earning a smidge of payola (H/T to Steve Clemons) for being an incompetent jerk with a really good lawyer, is there? (And don't miss this excellent discussion of cronyism, the Bush Administration and the downfall of Wolfowitz from John Burke at Neiman. And Steve Clemons has some great thoughts as well.)
Even Republicans on the Hill have begun to publicly speculate about Alberto Gonzales resigning from his post as Attorney General. Democrats have had to force the President's hand on this, and Republicans are rushing to jump on the "dump Alberto" bandwagon because the President refuses to admit either error or failure, and they are tired of picking up after the mess that Bush leaves behind him. With the mess at the Department of Justice at the moment, there are plenty of questions still being asked about the Bush Administration at this point — their lack of commitment to the rule of law, their lack of care for a department as crucial to the underpinnings of justice in this country as the DoJ, and their need to "win" at all costs, including the cost of decency and freedom all to jigger "the math." Shameful.
In case you missed it, C&L has video of Sen. Arlen Specter talking about this yesterday on Face the Nation. I'm not holding my breath that the Arlen shuffle will hold up to pressure, but it is telling that more and more Republicans are publicly distancing themselves from the President's minions in the hopes of saving their own political arses. Look for more and more of this in the days ahead — and for it not to work after years of rubber stamping for which they ought to all be held to account. The Bush failures are their failures, too, for they enabled them repeatedly for the last six years in a craven attempt to grab every last bit of K Street cash that Rove was willing to have tossed their way, and to get a turn at driving the power buggy so long as they were allowed the illusion of touching the reins while the Boy King was really driving (and even that is debatable about whose hands were really on the reins). Pathetic, but there you are — to sell your nation's ethics so cheaply ought to come at a very high price, indeed. (And don't think for a moment that just because the GOP is tap dancing around Rover's hand from the shadows in all of this that I'm going to forget about it. Not. Gonna. Happen.)
Speaking of high prices (and I'm not talking gas): The nice folks at the national Chamber of Commerce have decided to hold hostage the Bush Administration's push for some legislative action on immigration because…well, frankly, because they can at the moment. The Bush Administration is in such a weakened position from the pile-on of their myriad failures that erstwhile allies like the usual GOP pals at the Chamber can demand that the deal be sweetened whenever they like. Welcome to the world that Bush built, modern GOP. Enjoy. You've earned every painful minute of it by coddling and enabling the Boy King.
And, just for a moment, let's think about the fact that the natural allies of the GOP like the chamber of commerce crowd are demanding concessions and ignoring what George Bush wants because he doesn't have enough clout with them to push this through…and then think about how things are likely going in the international arena where he's made even fewer friends and is influencing pretty much no one.
Witness the fact that there will be no more wet, sloppy poodle kisses from the new British Prime Minister — leader of our staunchest allied nation in Europe. That's how our nation's bestest friends forever are treating us. Feeling safer now?
What is an increasingly marginalized failure of a President to do? Why, escape to his brush farm to entertain other world leaders who would rather be anywhere else on the planet than driving in a beat up pick-up truck on a dusty former pig farm with an infantile egomaniac in charge of the largest military force on earth. The AP describes an invitation to the President's ranch for the NATO leader as a sort of "coup" — perhaps to those who covet attention from the Boy King, but for anyone used to decent accommodations and interesting conversation it frankly sounds a bit more like Dante gone wild.
Meanwhile, in the real world, Al Qaeda is securing substantial new funds (H/T to Digby), increasing its influence in new places, stretching out tentacles in areas that can hurt us over the long term, and operating out of our military's reach in the wilds of Pakistan's mountainous tribal region. Hmmm…funding from our pals in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and elsewhere across the Islamic world where we have failed to make a dent in winning hearts and minds by making every strategic blunder possible the last six years. Still no sign of catching Osama Bin Laden, a man with failing kidneys and a portable dialysis machine in tow, and a bounty on his head to match his notoriety.
Increasing violence in Afghanistan and Iraq…with no end to our involvement in either nation in sight. An ever-shrinking pool of support from anyone else in the world for anything George Bush does, and the knowledge that his lame duckness is only getting worse by the hour. Less cooperation equals fewer eyes and ears on the ground for intelligence sharing with us — because no one trusts the word of the Bush Administration any longer after so many false cries of wolf and so many unfulfilled promises, and so many untended obligations that have been let go to seed. Feeling safer now?
But all is well in Bushworld, because there is brush to clear. Until mean old Harry Reid had to go and spoil the party: (H/T to ThinkProgress)
We hear that over the long August vacation, when those types of summer hires are made, Reid will call the Senate into session just long enough to force the prez to send his nominees who need confirmation to the chamber. The talk is he will hold a quickie “pro forma” session every 10 days, tapping a local senator to run the hall. Senate workers and Republicans are miffed, but Reid is proving that he’s the new sheriff in town.
What delicious icing on the accountability cake the Democratic leadership has been putting together since they took over in January. It is well past time for someone to call the President's increasingly weak and pitiful bluff — and I am thrilled that someone finally put their foot down and told his rampant cronyism and incompetency caravan to stop. For all of our sakes. But I'll bet this made for a shrub that was a wee bit frosted. About damned time.
(Photo of a delicious-looking piece of frosted chocolate cake via David Wilmot. Huge thank you to everyone who chipped in while I was on vacation and filled my posting spots — it was a lovely trip, and all the lovelier for me and for Mr. ReddHedd because I didn't have to worry a moment about the blog. Very much appreciated!)
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Peanut!
peanutbutter..
and jelly
and jelly
Christy, I really missed your presence here. Welcome back!
OT: That frosting looks like bacon.
Poodle kisses!
Christy’s back, all is right with the world.
Morning gang. Coffee is warm and that cake photo is evil. *g* Good to be back home.
Is anyone watching this? I’ve not been on-line for a couple of days much..
All Hamas leaders should be killed to end rocket attacks from Gaza, a senior Israeli cabinet official said today, as Israeli planes carried out new air strikes in the territory.
“I don’t distinguish between those who carry out the (rocket) attacks and those who give the orders. I say we have to put them all in the crosshairs,” said Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, the national infrastructure minister, on Israel Radio.
The comments from Mr Ben-Eliezer, a foreign policy hawk, came one day after Israeli jets struck the home of a Hamas politician, Khalil al-Hayya. He was not there but hospital officials said eight people were killed in the deadliest attack since Israel started retaliating to rocket salvos from Gaza last week.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/isra…..85,00.html
Back and feistier than ever!
A sign of good things to come? Let’s hope so. Coleman has been particularly strident in some of his appearances.
Nobel Prize-winning scientist considers challenging Coleman
I don’t comment much, but I want to now to thank you for your posts, Christy. I always learn so very much, and you give me hope. These are truly dark days – it’s wonderful to see where the flickers of light are.
N=1 at 10 — Thanks very much. :) I’m way behind on news, having purposely taken a break from everything the past week — so I’ll be catching up the next few days to get myself back up to speed.
CHRISTY! RAWKS!
Christy! Welcome back. Great post, as always. With all its outrageous and unconstitutional behavior, the Bush White House has the nerve to criticize Jimmy Carter and call him “irrelevant.” My blood just boiled when I read that in this morning’s paper. These people really think they’re invincible. I’ve got my fingers crossed for Gonzalez to resign this week. It’s too much to hope for a vote of no confidence, I’m afraid.
Welcome back Christy. You might want to extend your break from the news. . .aside the upcoming resignation of Abu teh Tortureman, the globe and its citizens are in a world of trouble, pretty much all around.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 11
Read any good books? Lately I am dipping into Sci-Fi/Fantasy more than ever.
I think this new blogger, Christy what’s her name, might work out. ;)
****
And Christy, I hope you notice that we left the place just as it was; we didn’t solve a single problem while you were gone, although the Balrogs have a new baby, and that’s progress. Great post.
More icing over at Think Progress
G’Morning All… Glad you had a nice vacation.
I’m wondering if any of the Democrats are going to defend Carter or just let the wingnuts slime him again?
EPUed from previous thread: It’s all about ROVE!
Have a look at this interview! Here’s a bit:
you may be right brother Scarecrow – think I once saw her eat a gooper on live tv :)
mornin again christy!
lettle comenatado;
I mentioned yesterday something that occured to me and it’s pretty important and certainly on point here;
since abu torture first came under pressure I said the president had to hang on to abu for as long as possible, that all his decisions will be rebuked if he resigns or is resigned
then a few days ago I had a further epiphame;
it’s imppossible for bush to allow abu torture to resign, if that happens whoever replaces him has to earn con firmation and anyone who earns confirmaiton will DENINATELY revist the decisions abu torture made and prefer charges committed against office, oath and constitution
that would even be a republican, anyone who has a shred of integrity will find the decisions made against the law.
then something dawned on me since republicans are starting to talk about abu torture stepping down too
there is a person that WILL earn confirmation but will NOT declare the presidnet’s programs illegal, and he WILL declare any inquiry into them a national security risk
that person is;
joe liarman
this will be win win win… for bush, rove, cheney
it’s also win win win for the republicans since liarman’s replacement is appointed by a republican
the only thing that might throw a wrench in this scenario is that joe might know he’s gone in two years and doesn’t want to be gone
however I pointed out joe actually believes the republicans can win in 08 and with him as ag that he helps them win
also, if he thinks he has a chance on a ticket as vp then ag for bush is an excellant step in that direction
scary stuff liarman as ag, he WILL win confirmation and he WILL continue the depgravity in the justtice department and in the illegal programs
as public pundits for democrats we need to get our act together if this scenario takes form, we need to have at the ready for instant email the answers republicans will give why liarman is NO CHOICE and will NOT be confirmed
corporate media is gonna be hard and furious against any democrat that objects to lairaman and democrats have to LAUGH in their face, then at the ready with the reasons liarman CANNOT earn confimration
The Democrats aere wusses. But Jimmy Carter is only saying what the overwhelming majority of Americans are saying.
Dubbya’s chief defenders are the Media Whores.
A pro forma session of Congress every 10 days…I wonder if that is to get around recess appointments.
katymine @ 18
yeah anyway! Why aren’t they defending him?
Welcome back, Christy! I hope you enjoyed your time away…we sure missed you though!
Ehrenstein!
didn;’t remember to set the tivo until 40 minutes in to program – did you appear on Today today ?
Chimpy’s song to Tony Blair.
Perris, no Lieberman will not give up a senate seat just to join a sinking ship of state. I don’t believe it.
Oh dang — was David on the Today show today? Wish I would have known, would have actually turned the show on if so. :)
Speech last week by Senator Robert Byrd, highlighted at Bob Geiger:
cbl @ 20
Anything to cover the taste of coffee.
noen @ 29
if lairman believed it was a sinking ship he would be acting like a democrat instead of a republican
he does not think it’s a sinking ship, he is indeed delusional oterwise he’d be voting with us and would not be endorsing and fund raising for republicans
check this quote out from a link posted in comments here;
CHS:
Yah, neither am I. Since the “Shuffling Bullet Theory” and an virtually infinite number of betrayals of the truth since, he’s been off my list.
Yay Christy! So glad you’re home.
egregious @ 23
is that for REAL, egreg??? woo hoo!
Christy, If you don’t do anything else to catch up on last week’s news, please watch Comey’s Senate testimony.
In many ways, that incident is a Rosetta Stone for the last 7 miserable years.
So is Condi ever going to fire Shaha or is Condi going to let an EMPLOYEE at the State Dept keep making more money than her!
perris @ 32
ummm sure, I’m partly convinced.. just not completely, not yet. I think you outline one plausible scenario but… I’m not ready to fully buy into it just yet.
katymine @ 18
You know, President Carter did a fine job defending himself this morning. I didn’t catch much of what he said on The Today Show, mind you.
It was his presence on site at Habitat for Humanity in New Orleans that said it all; the man was ready to start his day’s work rebuilding homes while the useless piece of crap in the White House has done next to nothing to help rebuild New Orleans.
Actions speak louder than words.
Rayne at 39 — Amen.
Adie @ 35
yes it is.
Reid’s plan to block Bush’s recess appointments.
S.O.S. from MA @ 33
i e-mailed ole arlen a sharp shove yestidie.
that should do it. HAH!
Welcome Back Christy! We missed you somethin’ fierce, but we’re so glad you could escape and relax. I can’t think of anyone who deserves it more. ;->
noen @ 39
check this out from laurie9’s link @19;
check this quote out from a link posted in comments here;
Submitted by BuzzFlash on Thu, 05/17/2007 – 4:06pm. Interviews
A BUZZFLASH INTERVIEW
People ask me: Are they going to steal the 2008 election? No, they’ve already stolen the 2008 election. We still have a chance of swiping it back, but the reason I’ve expanded and put out the new edition of Armed Madhouse is to tell you how they will steal in 2008, and what to do about it. That’s one of the main new things. Plus a special chapter on New Orleans and my bust down there.
– Greg Palast
Welcome back, Christy!
I have to ask, on my own behalf and representing certain brethren in Connecticut, what is wrong with wet, sloppy, poodle kisses?
Welcome back Christy. I missed you but was delighted that you were enjoying a well-deserved break!
Scarecrow @ 31
I’m with you on that one, Scarecrow, blecchhhh! Of course I had to spend months in rehab to beat the Coke-cola addiction! ;)
Welcome back, Redd! Hope you have a marveliscious time with Mr. Redd. Getting ready for Wednesday here. May even take the morning off.
noen @ 41
ooooohhh thanks! some of us were kickin’ that sort of idea around on the toobz yesterday, but with an abundance of ignorance about whether there was a way to do it, or not. yeehaw!
egregious @ 23
A pro forma session of Congress every 10 days…I wonder if that is to get around recess appointments.
Absolutely. I found an old case which said that a recess appointment made during a recess period of 6 to 10 days is suspect, but Bush appointed a judge to the Ct of Appeals on day 7 of a 10 day recess, and it was upheld.
Then somebody yesterday found on a senate site (I think) that a “recess” is an absence of more than *3* days.
so I’m thinking that Harry’s strategy needs re-tooling, and that there should be a pro-forma every day, just to be on the safe side.
I don’t know whether a recess is a recess if it hasn’t been officially *called* a recess, or whether the actual absence of members constitutes a de-facto “recess”.
At any rate, I think his ten-day plan isn’t sound.
Welcome back!! You sure were missed even though we have been carrying on with great posts.
S.O.S. from MA @ 33
emptywheel on Haggis is worth a read!
Yay! I just cleared my sched for day-afta-tomorrow. I plan on having an Excellentling time. ROTFLOL
TiredFed @ 47
Are there new questions for Miss Monica? I have been running around and haven’t checked…
Adie – there is some inside the beltway debate whether it’s 10 days or 3 days – looks like Reid has it covered either way
and we hippies advised him to keep Whitehouse and Webb in DC (they can drive home @ night) w/ Tester guarding the door
Elliott @ 52
I want to post on marcy’s site the same thing I posted here about abu torture but I can’t get the ccmments loaded, could someone do a cut and paste for me?
cbl @ 54
That would be a mighty long drive for Whitehouse. Perhaps you are thinking of Cardin-MD.
Mutant Poodle @ 53
I have one, they should get right to the point, “Where are the bodies?”
Hopefully, by the time Wednesday rolls around, I’ll be caught up on my vacation laundry and be able to type. *g* (Just kidding. Like I’d miss that!)
Rayne @ 39
i honestly think dear Jimmy C. is absolutely UN-slimeable at this point. Anything the scumbags throw will slop right back in their own uglifaces! ;->
Scarecrow @ 16
heh!
i think she will work out, and
beautifully — great round-up of. . .
bush’s.best-est.week.never.
this morning’s nytimes.com editorial
runs-down just about every salient
facet of the attorneys-bought-justice
scandal — and i’ve tried to link most
of the gray lady’s allegations to the
existing proof of each. . .
welcome back, christy! it should be
a good, if busy, news week on the hill. . .
Rayne @ 39
Here’s the video of Jimmy Carter on Today’s show. I don’t like the way this Meredith Vieira.
hey, nancy reagan’s becoming a democrat…from the lead on think progress;
Elliott @ 51
True. And Marcy’s insights are always more reliable than my old grudges. From her kbd to God’s ears, is wot I say! And if ol’ Arlen gains a shred of credibility from this smelly haggis, small price to pay, sez me.
Oops at 61. Link to Jimmy Carter on Today’s show from New Orleans.
cbl @ 54
tee hee. you just fixed my mopeymood problem for today. thanks a bunch. ;->
OT: HEY guys! Our bluebirds have eggs, and our chickadees have 3 babies outta the shell & counting ;->
perris @ 62
did they hear that over at Faux News?
Elliott @ 51
Emptywheel is always worth a read. The Scottish Haggis, indeed!
perris @ 62
I’m afraid that’s not enough to become a Democrat. She does side with Dems on issues say stem cells.
So Paul leaves because he set up his girlfriend in a job at the State Dept making more money than the head of the State Dept Condi Rice. Paul gets a $400,000 golden parachute which is paid for by the World Bank America is the biggest contributer to the bank so we the American tax payers just paid for Paul to go away. …Hmm I wonder if the press will even think of asking any of the Republican Anti Tax Presidential Candidates if THEY think that is a good use of the Tax Payers money.
egregious – of course you’re right about Cardin – just wishful thinking about that Marine with his packin’ heat an all :)
mui @ 64
Thanks… I just cannot stomach the morning dribble any more. Besides had to get out and do my walk before it hit 100. ;)
“got a cranium made of stona…”
Specter tends to talk tough but not follow through with action… he sticks with his party, even when he knows better…
Republicants who support Gonzo’s firing may not necessarily support a vote of no confidence – simply because it was initiated by Dems, and that would look bad… integrity is nonexistent…
Christy, I hope you had a wonderful vacation. It’s so great to have you back!
Is The Peanut feeling much better?
-S
Things Come Undone @ 69
does Shahaha get to keep her overpaid job, or does she go back to the one she had before her “man” started running the World Bank (into the ground)?
Am I right in thinking that both Condi and Gonzo ignored their last subpoenas? Aren’t there any consequences to doing that?
I braved The Today Show hoping to see David E. but he wasn’t on during the time I tuned in.
Matt Lauer was baiting Senator Clinton with Obama remarks about her war vote and with President Carter’s remarks on Bush. Clinton said she criticizes Bush and thinks everyone should be free to participate in open discussions (paraphrasing some of the interview).
Clinton is proposing quality pre-K care for all and “where in the world” Lauer wanted to know how we could pay billions a year for it. Has he ever asked how we can afford to pour billions down the drain in Iraq? How Republic Matt is!
perris @ 62
Apparently there is more to Reagan’s legacy than pretending to be a rancher.
Thanks for the great post Christy.
I may have missed FDL post or comments on this:
What do you make of the Iraqi Parliament demanding US troops to leave Iraq?
Basically saying US troops are dying for a govt. that does not want us in their country.
Might be another good reason to leave Iraq.
Looks like they would like us out by end of this year.
Saw above in ‘Faithful Progressive’ this morn. (new blog for me), and WaPo 5/11. Also have heard MSNBC evening guest say the same.
Christy:
Welcome back. On Friday, during Pach’s thread on the immigration bill, some commenters were clamoring for you to come back and clean out some right-wing trolls who dropped by…*g*
strategerie at 73 — It is good to be back. And we are all feeling much better now, thanks. Amazing what sleeping in a bit and getting some rest can do for you. :) Although, in The Peanut’s case, I think it was more a break from all the myriad germies from the kids at preschool — she had a two week absence between illness and vacation, and that did a world of good for her tired little immune system.
I think Republicans are finally calling for Gonzo’s resignation because they are fearful of what Monica’s testimony will be.
They want to get in front of the story before everything breaks open this week.
jayt @ 49
Absolutely. I found an old case which said that a recess appointment made during a recess period of 6 to 10 days is suspect, but Bush appointed a judge to the Ct of Appeals on day 7 of a 10 day recess, and it was upheld.
Then somebody yesterday found on a senate site (I think) that a “recess” is an absence of more than *3* days.
so I’m thinking that Harry’s strategy needs re-tooling, and that there should be a pro-forma every day, just to be on the safe side.
I don’t know whether a recess is a recess if it hasn’t been officially *called* a recess, or whether the actual absence of members constitutes a de-facto “recess”.
At any rate, I think his ten-day plan isn’t sound.
I agree.
A Jan 2007 CRS report has this:
“How Long Must the Senate Be in Recess Before a President May Make a Recess Appointment?
The Constitution does not specify the length of time that the Senate must be in recess
before the President may make a recess appointment. Over the last century, as shorter recesses have become more commonplace, Attorneys General and the Office of Legal Counsel have offered differing views on this issue. Most recently, in 1993, a Department of Justice brief implied that the President may make a recess appointment during a recess of more than three days.7 Appointments made during short recesses (less than 30 days), however, have sometimes aroused controversy, and they may involve a political cost for the President. Controversy has been particularly acute in instances where Senators perceive that the President is using the recess appointment process to circumvent the confirmation process for a nominee who is opposed in the Senate.”CRS Report
GeorgeSimian @ 75
apparently not in BushCoLand
as if there was ever any doubt that Lt Col Francona was total tool – just heard him tell MSNBC that the militants in Lebanon “may be al-qaeda”
christ! now they’re running with it
Mutant Poodle @ 53
not since you last commented. I have a bit more research going on the Iglesias firing – meetings between NM Republicans and Monica.
This is an excellent word picture Christy. I bolded my fave part.
I still consider it a pig farm as Goopers and their friends hang out there, and as we all know Goopers are definitely greedy pigs. My apologies to actual four legged pigs for conflating them with Bushies and their cronies.
Perris’ speculations re: liarman and Greg Palast’s predictions re: the 2008 election are scary indeed. If those guys manage to stay in charge and the Harpoon Buffoon manages to stay in charge here in Canuckistan, it’s time to quit talking, writing and acting politically and revive the true spirit of ‘76. (that’s 1776, in case you weren’t clear). This time though the Loyalists to King George the lesser can go to Gitmo rather than here.
Georgesimian -
Condi and Tenet to testify before Waxman 6/19
cbl @ 54
Of course, there are 3 Democratic senators who are already quite close by (MD and VA), and a few more just a bit up the road (DE, NJ, PA, WV). Sen. Whitehouse may want to enjoy Memorial Day weekend at home with his family (he has sure earned it).
cbl @ 84
Their breaking news banner said: Lebanese army pounding suspected al qaeda hideouts.
OT – Did anyone in the Mpls.-St. Paul area attend commencement exercises yesterday at William Mitchell College of Law and hear James Comey give the keynote? I only learned of it this morning.
cbl @ 88
which do we want first, tennet and have condi have to dance around what he says or condi and have tennet say things condi denied under oath?
GeorgeSimian @ 75
not exactly — but close.
gonzo had hertling answer by
delivering two email chains — of
about five million. . .
he answered — as a matter of
form, only — now it is up to leahy.
condi has been rescheduled to
june 19, i believe, by consent.
old gold @ 36
holy cow! that’s right, christy missed it!
transcript (thank you marty)
partial video (thank you politics tv)
audio mp3 (scroll down to #6)
emptywheel on fire about the implications of Comey’s testimony about the Ashcroft hospital incident:
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.c…..tails.html
Lynne @ 90
a graduation speech?? oh! there just HAS to be a YouTube copy. Don’t-cha-think?!
an instant bookmark in the making, at least in this house. ;->
I was on shortly aftyer that, Sally. It was a very brief clip but it made my living room look like th library at Xanadu in Citizen Kane
Lynne at 90 — I am trying to get a copy of the remarks from the college of law. Will certainly let everyone know if I get my hands on them – I heard it was a good speech.
cbl @ 70
Webb’s the Marine, and he -would- guard the Senate.
David Ehrenstein @ 96
nearly instantaneous blogging of your own tv appearance – now THAT’s way cool!
David E., sorry I missed you. That was the first time I watched the program since long before Kitten C. left.
David Ehrenstein @ 96
btw, did the broadcast include that close up of Chomsky’s book?
“I think it’s sad that President Carter’s reckless personal criticism is out there,” White House spokesman Tony Fratto responded Sunday from Crawford, Texas, where Bush spent the weekend.
“I think it’s unfortunate,” Fratto said. “And I think he is proving to be increasingly irrelevant with these kinds of comments.”
Carter made the comments to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in a story that appeared in the newspaper’s Saturday editions.
Carter has been an outspoken critic of Bush, but the White House has largely refrained from attacking him in return. Sunday’s sharp response marks a departure from the deference that sitting presidents traditionally have shown their predecessors.
In the newspaper interview, Carter said Bush had taken a ”radical departure from all previous administration policies” with the Iraq war.
“We now have endorsed the concept of pre-emptive war where we go to war with another nation militarily, even though our own security is not directly threatened, if we want to change the regime there or if we fear that some time in the future our security might be endangered,” Carter said. link
Emptywheel, I love how clear everything becomes when you ’splain it! More on Comey:
http://thenexthurrah.typepad.c…..ukes_.html
cbl 84
christ! now they’re running with it
just got this-
Subject: CNN International Breaking News
– Large explosions and gunfire rock Tripoli as fighting between Lebanese troops and militants in Palestinian refugee camp escalates.
Watch CNN or log on to http://edition.cnn.com for the latest news.
Redd, you simply must see the 20 minutes or so of Comey’s testimony. It was riveting.
If you have time, there are a few questions over at my place (TiredFed) that we sent to John Conyers on Friday for him to ask Monica. I was hoping someone could send a follow-up to any of the HJC members just in case (none are from MD).
Did you see Bobby Byrd’s latest blast?
Lynne @ 90
CSPAN runs many commencement speeches, I’ll look over there to see if it’s scheduled for broadcast.
theExile @ 86
Is there really a pig farm there? I remember Amy Goodman saying once that the Bush Ranch is wrongly classified as a ranch. It is an estate. I’m just wondering how many cows and pigs . . . really?
Just remember a big chunck of the 400,000.000 is going to the high priced lawyer, not Wolfe’s bank account.
Nope.
Mandrake @ 107
none that i’ve seen, ‘cept that pot-belly one..
oh, oops, nevermind. sorry mrshootersir…
I’m off for some tennis, c all L8ter
christy,
glad you had a good vacation! also glad to have you back!
specter, i think we realize, is merely doing the dance that keeps getting him elected: talking tough enough for pennsylvania democrats, but being the bush lapdog when it truly counts.
quick q: monica taking fifth, then getting immunity — does this void her law license?
It is nothing short of outrageous that these Bush honchos (Wolfowitz, Tenet, etc.) receive platinum ’shoots and medals for incompetence. How many children in my country could be fed on $400,000? I am beside myself.
School is out here. I’m commin’ ‘homa sweet person.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…..mp;search=
Lynne @ 90
Oh my. That reminds me. candidates are probably out all over canvassing “the commencement speech.”
perris @ 21
No chance of that happening, LIEberman isn’t stupid — he just got re-elected to the Senate. He’s not going to trade 5 years of Senatorial power for 18 months of cleaning up after the Idiot-in-Chief.
The title “Attorney General” is no where near as attractive as “Senator” and LIEberman knows it.
The Bush Brush Ranch from here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prairie_Chapel_Ranch:
Prairie Chapel Ranch is a 1583 acre (6.4 km) estate located seven miles (10 km) northwest of Crawford, Texas. It is the home of President George W. Bush. Then-Governor Bush bought the land, which was a former turkey/hog farm, in 1999 shortly after earning a $14.3 million profit from the sale of the Texas Rangers.
I had a chance to speak to someone who works under Wolfowitz at the World Bank yesterday and she said he had a good grasp of what needed to be done for the organization and due to his keen mind he was able to step into the position rather quickly. However she said he is one of those people who is highly intellectual but socially and ethically dysfunctional, unable to see how the salary increase approved for his girlfriend would be perceived and not understanding why it was wrong. My friend said everyone in the organization is now waiting for the other shoe to drop regarding Wolfowitz’ promised retaliation as he makes good on his “F*** you.”. She said they feel it was no idle threat.
Dear CHS:
You’re on fire today.
You go, gurl! More of the same.
:-)
Welcome back, Christy. Hey, are the Charlie Rose people ever going to reschedule your segment?
Hi Christy–hope you had a nice break. Great to see you–you were missed.
Are we trusting Specter not to cave?
cal @ 4
As my wife once said to me, there are few things in life that can’t be improved through the addition of either chocolate or bacon.
Lynne @ 90
not that it wouldn’t be worthwhile,
but his topic was apparently “lessons
from the enron-era” — not the
u.s. attorneys, nor unconstitutional
wire-tap programs, circa 2004
[see center column, lower portion,
of linked law school page]. . .
he he. . .
ccmask @ 120
Anyone who trusts Specter (”The Scottish Haggis”, as Marcy has now dubbed him) to do anything deserves what they get.
Dave @ 117
These are the qualities that made him an excellent Bush crony.
I think Loseman is thinking he’ll be part of the Unity ‘08 ticket…
.
mui @ 64
NOOOOoooo Jimmy! Don’t back down one inch!! “During a time of war…” BULLCRAP! howzabout “During a time of war that HE started, illegally…” Don’t freakin apologize to the Dear Leader!! Hit ‘im again! Hit ‘im again! Harder! Harder!!
wgg: tokin librul @ 125
‘zzactly
this is why I believe he takes the ag in a heartbeat
Spectre has an unblemished record of tough talk, and promises to be firm, but inevitably caving to the interests of the Busheviks.
i expect nothing less…
/
Lynne @ 90
OT – Did anyone in the Mpls.-St. Paul area attend commencement exercises yesterday at William Mitchell College of Law and hear James Comey give the keynote? I only learned of it this morning.
——————-
CSPAN runs many commencement speeches, I’ll look over there to see if it’s scheduled for broadcast.
——————-
nope not yet, but the commencement speeches are broadcast as part of their American Perspectives series
lesson #1: steal as much as you can as fast as you can.
lesson #2: rinse, repeat…
./
My friend also said the World Bank was set back ten years due to Wolfowitz and the resulting loss of prestige among the different countries of the world. She said that China had been stepping in offering loans to countries in Africa. Whereas the World Bank was offering no-interent loans, China was coming in with standard interest rate loans. Now poor African countries that probably never had the intention of paying back these loans in the first place will be indebted to China instead of the World Bank (which tends to forgive billions of dollars of unpaid loans, she said).
I know there’s a whole other side to this story ala “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,” but it made me think twice.
Neil @ 102
Actually, Carter made those comments in an interview with BBC World Service.
You know, the Gonzales-Ashcroft bedside scene was probably supposed to be framed differently. It was supposed to be like a scene from “24″. You know–Gonzales heroically obtains a signature in order to permit some secret wiretap somewhere to get THE critical information about Jose Padilla or something, and the next 9-11 gets stopped just-in-time. I am serious. That is what the Roves wanted to portray this as. Gonzales keeps referring to it as the the program that President divulged and refuses to talk about the others. They are trying even now to suggest this was a supercritical program on the war on terror.
Christy home! The morning just clicked a shade brighter!
Tired Fed -
That’s a passing fair selection of questions/suggestions on your site; assume you have made sure the *appropriate* people have had it called to their attention. Guess I’m either going to have to take a car ride to nowhere or run the battery down trying to catch the hearing on its first run. (FYI – “passing fair” = my lexicon for “it don’t get no better”.) *g*
nothing yet via Google or youtube on Comey’s address “Lessons from the Enron Era”
school site:
link
wgg: tokin librul @ 130
heh!
good one!
i HOPE his speech was
about “the bad guys — ultimately,
always, always — run out of runway. . .”
nolo @ 122
Enron, you say? Hmmm . . . Gaming the system, going around regulators, stacking oversight bodies with political cronies who promise to look the other way . . .
Sounds like it might apply to the US Attorney story to me.
Dave @ 117
I certainly don’t have the connection to the story you do, but my guess would be that Wolfie will go quietly now since he got his money.
No need to piss off anyone while waiting for his next wingnut welfare position to materialize.
Welcome back, Redd! You were missed!
A prediction:
cbl @ 70
Nah, the heat packin Marine is Webb, he’s from VA so that’s kewl…
o/t
karma’s a bitch
Phelps to protest at Falwell funeral
Biodun @ 132
Actually, Carter made those comments in an interview with BBC World Service.
Who was that clueless eeeeeeddiotttt on MSNBC who was interviewing ex-President Carter? What a blind, Bushie-talking-point spewing, waste of human skin (and too much hairspray also, I’m sure)!!! She has no clue that even though she’s prolly pulling down hundreds of simoleons per year, that she (and Little Boots too) are simply unfit to breathe the same air as Jimmy. They ought to be, but would never admit to being, ashamed of themselves. FEH
Read any good books? Lately I am dipping into Sci-Fi/Fantasy more than ever.
Good morning! I’m so glad to see you back writing ferociously. One great ’speculative fiction’ writer is Maria Dora Russell of ‘The Sparrow’ & “Children of God’ fame. Hope you will give them a try. Now back to the mess.
jayt @ 49
…
At any rate, I think his ten-day plan isn’t sound.
Agreed. I was worried about this talk of Abu Gonzalez resigning over Memorial Day weekend as a ploy for a recess appointment.
Biodun @ 139
A disturbance in the dark side of the force, perhaps?
Glenn Greenwald in Salon today:
Organic George @ 108
also recall that for this crowd, $400 g is couch change.
CNN.com’s poll this morning:
(Looks like Carter is more popular than Shrub. Also more relevant.)
Christy,
Any opinion on the amount of damage Monica Goodling will do this week?
My take is that she and Susan R. will be the “straws” that bring these crooks down, but from what I read here most FDL’ers don’t think so.
Your thoughts?
cbl @ 141
at first I thought you were talking about that fly I just swatted, it did have Falwellian attributes!
Brisingamen @ 115
think you’re right about this — but i do think there’s one repub senator who would take the gig, and that would be … orrin hatch.
I haven’t had time to read the comments this morning but wrt Memorial Day weekend, can Bush replace Gonzales during the holiday?
Biodun @ 139
Is this a ‘trial balloon’ to see if anyone objects to Gonzo going?
was whining somewhere yesterday that there wasn’t enough support in the Senate for confirmation
Elliott @ 150
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MieDFkhlByo
More Greenwald:
dmg @ 151
Oh, man – I need to take a shower every time I hear that smarmy schmuck speak.
STTP — No opinion as yet. Am still digging out from a week’s worth of emails and SPAM, and haven’t had an opportunity as yet to put out feelers from folks with ears to the ground on this. Will let you know, though, if I get any hints.
cbl @ 154
for his own nomination?
dmg – yeppers
Mutant Poodle @ 157
tell me about it, they ought to give irish spring coupons away with every tv appearance.
OMFG. They are a cultural joke.
I don’t know why I have the television on, just for background noise while I fold laundry. There’s the stupid Family Feud game show on, and I’ve forgotten to change the channel to something more entertaining and stimulating like the Weather Channel.
But…just as I go to change the channel, the host asks the question, “Name a person who has no sense of humor.”
The first two answers?
Take a guess.
cbl @ 160
not saying he’s a good choice. in fact, i think the dems know enough not to trust him — trust orrin? in the same sentence? hah!
still, he’s in that “i’m bored in the senate, especially now that i’m in the minority” mood, and has always fancied himself as a top washington dog. a stint as a.g. would burnish credentials — and make him bulletproof through confirmation hearings for the true brass ring: sup ct. justice.
Conversation with a reporter:
Orrin and Mitt for ‘08. A balanced ticket.
OT alert For those of us that have been witness to the Palestinians suffering lo these many years under the heavy foot of imperialism how about this for pure and unadulterated chutzpah
http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/0521-01.htm
dmg –
there is that rather troublesome matter of the language slipped in to the rev. Patriot Act – bypassing the Senate – his esteemed colleagues seem to think the good senator from Utah may have had a hand in it :)
Orrin. He always seems so arrogant, sanctimonious, self assured and self-righteous. And ruthless. My kind of Republican.
Noen at #9 – Oh, what wonderful news that a good man like Agre would even consider coming back to Minnesota to help us out. And his worry about Bush altering real scientific research is right on the money and his run would highlight these crims by Bush and his cronies.
I live in Minnesota and whil I like Franken and knew Ciresi personally many years ago, this candidate (if quick on his feet) would be even better. Coleman needs to go.
Now about that woman from the 6th district…
Now CNN wants to talk to me.
Rove is the ‘one’.
OT–
New York Magazine has a special cover story this week:
David Ehrenstein @ 170
way — WAY — way cool!
go get ‘em!
I know I’m always late- I get called away from my office…
But are there any psychologists here who can explain the pathology of the WH responses to everything when all responses seem to fall into the Peewee Herman “I know you are but what am I?” cliche.
Please enlighten me.
Thanks for the tip, P J Evans, about CNN’s poll.
Go hit the poll, Pups, the freepers are getting to it.
http://www.cnn.com/
Peterr @ 137
DING!
i think so too — thus the
“not that it wouldn’t be worthwile. . .”
double-negative, above. . .
thanks, peterr. . .
whoo boy howdy ! …. a fresh and warm … sweet n’ snarkie pastry for breakfast.
Thanks for all your good cookin’ Christy, you keep our tummies happy and our hearts full of hope.
perris @ 62
Oww, did anyone see that Republican guy (last name of Gold) on CSPAN yesterday that wrote the book: The Invasion of the Party Snatchers (How the Holy Rollers and the Neocons Took Over the Republican Party) some such. He’d worked for quite a few Republican VP’s, starting as far back as Ford, I believe.
He said the party had been taken over by neocons and “theocons” (Falwells). Well, basically, they’re radicals, not conservatives, which we’ve all known for so long. But it was interesting to get his take (at Cato Institute) on his own party. He was not a happy camper.
Why don’t more speak out? Or are they just too ashamed?
Had the chance to see Jello Biafra over the weekend. What a great speaker. I encourage everyone to keep their ears out in their local scene to see if Jello makes an appearance.
abarefootboy at 177 — Glad you enjoyed it. It’s awfully nice to be home again, even though the vacation was lovely. :)
I do not admire Nancy Reagan. Ms. Reagan is hard-right.
Welcome back Redd!
Here’s a little background data as the next election cycle begins to grind into life- Gallup’s latest on the abortion issue:
A new Gallup Values and Belief national survey of 1,003 adults (conducted 5/10 through 5/13) finds:
49% of Americans consider themselves “pro-choice,” 45% say “pro-life.”
56% say abortions should be “legal under any certain circumstances,” 26% say “legal under any,” and 18% say “illegal in all.”
53% would not like to see Roe v. Wade overturned; 35% would.
cancer_cures @ 179
saw him a few years back — okay,
more than a few — in boulder. . .
so, i’d echo yours — is he
on a speaking tour, again?
i do hope so. . .
Mandrake @ 178
the man’s name, i believe is victor gold, and if it’s who i think it is, he’s no pureheart either — the author of many a savage attack on dems in the past, sort of opporesearch before oppo was cool. (am remembering one “bio” of ted kennedy, but there were others.
anyway, the significance of victor dissing the neos is, i think, simply that the entire political spectrum knows that the neos have discredited themselves for a generation, and this is now jousting for position in the post-neo landscape.
Hi folks, checking in at the start of what’s shaping up to be another interesting week…
Just called my lousy senators (Allard and Salazar) to remind them that we’re paying attention and Gonzo must go. I confess that I don’t often bother with Allard, but with the news that he’s not too happy about what happened to him wrt his USA recommendation, it seemed worth a try.
And Salazar needs all the “Backbone Helper” he can get. I’ve been dissing Gonzo to him from the start, but it sounds like maybe he’s finally coming around.
Anybody else out there with Working Assets long distance? They don’t charge you for calls you make to your representatives…
Biodun @ 164
He can’t share it because the answer is: “No. You can’t fire me – I know where all the bodies are. In fact, George, I know where your TANG records are, and where all of the court documents are. I know how much you’re drinking – but then, you already know that, don’t you.”
rw — It is good to be home. And I have a pix coming up in a bit that you will enjoy. ;-)
ot, sort of, and probably headed for epu:
happened to see “the Lives of Others” over the weekend — if you haven’t seen this german winner of the best foreign film oscar you should — and one line jumped out at me early.
the protagonist, a stasi agent specializing in monitoring and interrogations, notes to a class how you know someone is lying.
paraphrasing: “when they say the same thing over and over, without deviation in their statement. it means they studied their response. people who tell the truth can tell the same story in different ways.”
when he said that, the only thing i could think of was the Bush Meme of the Day.
they ALWAYS use the same — not similar, SAME, language.
Redd- Looking forward to it!!
David Ehrenstein @ 170
Hope they want to listen, also.
I do.
When has the “Mainstream” ever wanted to listen?
david ehrenstein at 170
ALLRIIIIIIIIGHT!!!!!!! GO DAVID!!!!!!!! maybe you can get chomsky in there yet…….or anything else you want.
David Ehrenstein @ 170
About what, David?
On the USAs, no one seems to be talking about the tactical implications of the McNulty resignation.
As I understand it, by resigning without a date certain, McNulty denied Bush the chance to make a recess appointment and made a confirmation hearing certain.
However, it also means that McNulty would be the Acting AG if Gonzo were to step down.
Assuming McNulty is a Good Guy and believes in the Rule of Law (presumably the real reason he resigned was in protest of the violation of the Rule of Law,) then we could reasonably expect McNulty to clear away Gonzo’s Obstructions of the investigations of the White House and get some accountability from Rove, Miers, Cheney, Card, and Bush.
For that reason alone – that McNulty would loose the investigative dogs on Bush – Gonzo will never resign! A vote of no-confidence is a trifle compared to the Hell that’s waiting to be exposed!
It’s a stalking war – and everyone except John Q Public seems to know it.
sumpl @ 174
it’s
all
about
the
stall
Waccamaw @ 134
well, I “aggregated” quite a few from folks like emptywheel, Mutant Poodle and many others. I sure have to agree with you on one thing, it was a brighter morning today than the past week or so (been missin’ some ReddHedd).
NOLO @ 183:
His tour dates are listed here but unfortunately, it looks like he won’t be doing much around the rest of the states. Those in SAN FRANCISCO should check out his shows on the 24th or June 8th.
radiofreewill @ 194
Is this true?? Inquiring minds want to know…
Biodun @ 146
is he (McConnell) kidding? doesn’t he know how fast the blogosphere is these days?????
ccmask @ 152
yup. if the Senate recesses.
Gonzales no confidence resolution is introduced in the House:
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/….._0521.html
Wow. Unbelievable what a divider Bush is. A deviding deciderer.
From the Raw story article comes a comparison to fishing:
“Some serious questions remain unanswered. But we shouldn’t kid ourselves. In an L.A. Times poll last month, 63 percent of Americans believed that Congress is pursuing this matter to gain partisan advantage,” said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), Ranking Republican on the committee, in the May 10 hearing. “If there are no fish in this lake, we should reel in our lines of questions, dock our empty boat and turn to more pressing issues.”
radiofreewill @ 194
its exactly this scenario that Bush would want to avoid. If Gonzo resigns, McNulty is acting AG, but Bush can recess appoint a new AG any time he wants (as a long as the Senate is recessed). So I dont see how it matters that McNulty is there or not. I must be missing something.
TiredFed @ 204
unless of course McNulty has time to appoint a special prosecutor.
Some good news for a change, even though I just figured out we’re on a new thread:
dems outpaced Gop for the first quarter in Georgia,North Carolina, Alabama,Mississippi,Louisiana,Kentucky, Virginia and Florida.
Gop outpaced Dems in:
South Carolina,Tennessee,Arkansas and Texas
JOSH HAS IT HERE.
TiredFed @ 205
That could get interesting.
Wonder how much of that $400,000. will go to Bennet for fees?
ccmask @ 203
Oh, yeah. That’s like weeding your garden without pulling out the roots. Would they rather we used Weed-Be-Gone?
ccmask @ 206
God, I am so sick of my state being so slap full of ignorant people.
jayt @ 49
Absolutely. I found an old case which said that a recess appointment made during a recess period of 6 to 10 days is suspect, but Bush appointed a judge to the Ct of Appeals on day 7 of a 10 day recess, and it was upheld.
That’s because the full period was eventually attained. It doesn’t matter what day the appointment is made as long as the recess does, in fact, exceed ten days.
I’m doubtful of that. But the Constitution states that a President can only make APPOINTMENTS during recesses of more than 10 days.
so I’m thinking that Harry’s strategy needs re-tooling, and that there should be a pro-forma every day, just to be on the safe side.
I don’t know whether a recess is a recess if it hasn’t been officially *called* a recess, or whether the actual absence of members constitutes a de-facto “recess”.
At any rate, I think his ten-day plan isn’t sound.
egregious @ 56
An interesting possibility is that the House can refuse to accede for an adjournment of the Senate for more than three days. Thus the House can essentially provide the legal foundation for challenging any “recess appointments” by Bush.
The Constitution states that the other House must approve any adjournment of more than three days.
In addition, there is considerable debate about whether the original intent of interim appointments were even a) applicable to cases where the vacancy occurred BEFORE the recess, and b) whether such appointments were meant to deal with adjournments while the body was still in a regulation Session. Periods of a few days adjournment would seem to require the “advise and consent” protocol to occur…and even most “interim appointments” made by earlier Presidents went to the Senate for confirmation upon their return.
This was the apparent application as intended as the Constitution clearly states that the appointment is in effect UNTIL the next SESSION of Congress when confirmation will be determined. Thus the appointment/advise and consent function move smoothly. There was no intent of the Founders to introduce an “escape clause” for the Executive to avoid confirmation…rather it was to allow an emergency, and temporary, appointment until the Senate COULD fulfill its function.
Neil @ 102
If Carter was so “irrelevant” why is the White House bothering to attack him? Sounds like just the opposite tio me…unless the WH attacks the irrelevant and ignores the important?
btw, kids, fresh thready goodness up and ready for the reading, if anyone wants it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the Senate didn’t take a recess for the rest of Bush’s presidency.
Monica’s testimony this week – Gonzo won’t flinch.
No confidence vote this week – Gonzo won’t flinch.
I actually think the Senate will have Gonzo arrested in June.
Impeachment takes too much time, given that Gonzo’s overall mission is to Obstruct Justice.
Taking out Gonzo and propelling McNulty into the AG’s job would open the sluices on every currently stalled White House investigation as well as untold new ones.
It’s not too bold to say – As goes Gonzo, so goes Bush. In chess, you would say Bush the King is pinned behind Gonzales the Pawn.
For an interesting read check out what Christopher Hitchens, who is close to both Wolfowitz and to his partner, has to say on the matter of this scandal.
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline…..927334.htm
According to Hitchens, Wolfowitz tried to recuse himself from the situation, and then when that was denied was punished for arranging Ms. Riza’s exit from the World Bank in a manner amicable to all.
Of course, all of this coming from the enigma Hitchens, who has a flair for the dramatic and a penchant for protecting neocons, especially architects of this war, at all cost.
This is not an endorsement or a condemnation of Wolfowitz (seems to be plenty of that on both sides, as usual, and for more than just the World Bank fiasco) but just another perspective into the story.
t