While Meet the Press didn't see fit this week to even mention James Comey's jaw-dropping testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week (I guess Shooter didn't give Pumpkinhead the thumb's up), US News has an article on the fallout from Comey's testimony:
If the thinking in the administration was that Gonzales can ride it out," says Steven Dettelbach, a former federal prosecutor and former Democratic staffer on the Senate Judiciary Committee, "this is Exhibit A that it could get worse."
Indeed, congressional sources tell U.S. News that Democrats will ask the Texas Bar Association to determine whether Gonzales violated his code of professional responsibility or broke laws by bringing up the NSA program in the hospital in front of Ashcroft's wife, who lacks security clearances. "I am not going to speculate on discussions that may or may not have taken place," Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd responded, "much less attempt to render a legal judgment on any such discussions."
That's certainly an interesting angle.
Such actions have made Comey something of a bete noire in the Bush administration-even though Comey believes that Bush respected him and wanted him to do the right thing. Indeed, now some Democrats, including Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, say they will even back Comey for attorney general if Gonzales resigns. "The only thing worse than being vilified by the left," says Comey with a laugh, "is being idolized by the left."
I agree with Glenn Greenwald, Abu will never resign:
It has seemed highly unlikely all along, and still does, that Bush is going to ever force Gonzales to leave, or that Gonzales will leave on his own. Independent of all the cultural and psychological dynamics that govern Bush's "loyalty" fetishses, the single most important asset Bush has right now is that the prosecutorial machinery is in the clutches of his most craven, obedient and loyal follower.
If Gonzales leaves, then his replacement will have to be confirmed by the Senate, which is highly unlikely to confirm anyone who is too politically loyal to the Bush circle. That means that the only alternative to Gonzales' staying is an independent Justice Department that acts in the interests of justice, rather than Bush's political and personal interests. That is what Bush fears most, and that is why Gonzales will almost certainly stay, unless he is forced out.
And Comey as AG? Well there is that pesky "pleasure of the President" thing that Bush just loves to roll lecherously off his tongue. Considering the fact that there are probably chickens being frantically waved as Commander Codpiece sticks one pin after another into his little Comey effigy just before he takes his afternoon nap, I think that'll happen just after hell freezes over and shortly before pigs fly.
And why hadn't Comey testified before?
Comey told U.S. News he was prepared to testify about the Ashcroft incident for more than three years but never did. Why? "Nobody ever asked," he said. "I've never been in a forum where I was obligated to answer the question. Short of that, it was not something I was going to volunteer."
That would be the great statesman and moderate Arlen Specter who refused to subpoena Comey when the details of the midnight trip to Ashcroft's room came out in January of '06. It doesn't make Comey a hero, but given the vindictive nature of the thugs of BushCo and the fact that Comey has small children it is understandable:
His actions at the hospital, he testified, earned him Card's wrath. Soon after Gonzales became attorney general, his then chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, told Comey that Gonzales's "vision" was to merge the deputy's office with Gonzales's own office. That meant that Comey would have lost some of his autonomy, becoming less of a leader and more of a senior staff member. A source close to Sampson says he merely wanted Gonzales and Comey to operate as a "seamless leadership team," with "harmony rather than conflict," and never meant to "degrade the status or authority" of the deputy. Comey didn't buy it. "You may want to try that with the next deputy attorney general," Comey is said to have responded to Sampson. "But it's not going to work with me."
I'd still like to hear someone ask Comey about the details of his depature from the DoJ and whether, as looseheadprop has speculated, he was indeed the first "purge."
(YouTube h/t Bailey, via AmericaBlog)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
zed?
Jane!!!
Comey the first purge?
Or Ashcroft?
I swear if the Dems cave on this bil… I’ll, I’ll-agghhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
And so it goes, the more we speculate, the more we underestimate the corruption & crassness of Bush Handlers, Inc.
“Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing” - John Fletcher Moulton
Jane!
Let’s hope for a vote of no confidence, then. I really want to see Gonzalez out of a job.
wow, posted this next to last downstairs and it’s on point here;
holy CROW, I’ve had ANOTHER epiphame!
leahy or waxman calls comey back one more time.
in open session he asks him point blank;
“did any prograsm you thought was illegal include stealing private or business information from any members of congress or stealing information from any American you thought had nothing to do with national security or you thought they could never get demonstrate any reason to eavesdrop on their business or private lives?
comey HAS to say;
“I am not at liberty to reveal any information regarding any of these programs”
HA…THEN the wing nuts will get it…the administration is STEALING information
leahy goes on;
“withstanding the information you are not at liberty to testify, could there be programs you don’t know about that DID involve stealing information that had NOTHING to do with national security”
HA
comey CAN answer this question SINCE it’s only speculation from his perspective, his answer HAS to be, “I don’t know, it’s possible” or, “yes, that is possible, I don’t know though”
BINGO
howz the expression go?
never ask your witness a questionyou don’t know the answer to?
we know the answers to these questions don’t we, they cannot be anything but
I wonder if we will look back on all this blogging as a desperate attempt to make a difference. One that was ignored.
OfT: Chris Matthews asks, “Will Bill Clinton be more trouble than he’s worth?”
jeebus, Tweety, project much?
snowbird42 @ 8
answer to the first part of your post, yes, we are desperate to save our country and her constitution
your second part, we are hardly ignored, we are no small component of what happened in the most recent elections and we will be the main reason electronic voting machines are not used in the next presidential election
WE ARE HERE AND WE MADE A DIFFERANCE
and we will continue making a differance
Blue Dido @ 6
What makes anyone think that a mere vote of no confidence will make Gonzo resign? The only thing that will force him out is impeachment, or the threat thereof.
perris @ 7
Nitpick Alert: I think the word you’re reaching for is:
EPIPHANY
OT - hope this report is wrong, but in any case it might be useful to give our reps a call today:
Report: Dem Leadership To Give Bush His Way On Iraq
By Greg Sargent
perris @ 10
Thanks, sometimes it is all too discouraging. You all are great chin-up help
. . . “only alternative to Gonzales’ staying is an independent Justice Department that acts in the interests of justice, rather than Bush’s political and personal interests. That is what Bush fears most, and that is why Gonzales will almost certainly stay . . .
Couldn’t agree more:
from: Gonzales, Butt-plugs, Job Security & the Dutch
slainte,
cl
Yeah, that’s classic. I wonder if he’s ever tried that one with his wife. “But Honey, you never asked me if I was having sex with your best friend.”
Dude, the Administration was clearly off the deep end and you didn’t say anything about it because “nobody ever asked”? I’m glad you finally told the truth when someone happened to ask, but that doesn’t exactly make you a paragon of virtue. In comparison, maybe, but not otherwise.
I wonder if we will ever find out what it takes to get a guy impeached by a Democrat controlled Congress?
Abu has no support, and as was mentioned by Greenwald, his hold on the prosecutorial machinery is one thing shielding republican criminality from more investigation, and all we are going to get from the Dems who control congress is investigations, so maybe that will tempt them…
Morris Sheppard @ 11
he won’t resign, he can’t cuz the next ag is gonna be brutal to him and bush…unless of course they find someone who will be confirmed and who they know will affirm their stealing information programs
however when he refuses to resing it will set the table for impeachment
I would love to get impeachment on the table too
I think someone should prefer charges against gonzales, obstruction of justice or whatever
I want to see him refuse to recuse himself and then the ag’s he’s promoted will refuse to recuse themselves as well
The Gonzo Dilemma, or the AG3 oxymoron:
No one who’ll keep W’s secrets can be confirmed; no one confirmable will keep W’s secrets. There is an RGJoe exception to this rule.
When Abu is impeached, can we just put the DoJ into some type of public receivership? Maybe Janet Reno will come out of retirement to run it. (sound of wingnut heads exploding offstage)
Henchmen Card, Gonzales, Libby, Addington, Wolfowitz
Minions Goodling, Sampson, Jennings, Doan, McNulty, Scholzman
Flunkies Congressional Republicans, Fox News talking points spouters
Stooges All MSM except Colbert, Stewart and Olberman. Gonzo wants us to think he’s a stooge, but he’s not.
perris @ 10
Amen.
Thanks Jane. No one else ever seems to have the same punch. “I think that’ll happen just after hell freezes over and shortly before pigs fly”.
It will be a long wait.
Hi Jane! Welcome back, Christy!
OT -sorry, but I received a request from Common Cause to write a letter to the FCC about Net Neutrality. I wrote - thought you all might want to do so also:
Send a message to the FCC before the June 15th deadline at http://www.commoncause.org/InternetFreedom.
Unless they have the votes to override the veto, what else can they do? They’ve already sworn they were going to fund the troops.
Politically (and that’s what they all care about) it would be a disaster to not keep the funding going now. In four months, maybe it will be a different story. Maybe they will have the veto override votes.
In a Havana bar {Godfather II}:
Fredo: ” Michael, How do you say ‘banana daiquiri’?”
Michael Corleone: “Banana Daiquiri.”
TeddySanFran @ 18
as I said on a previous thread, there is someone who will definately get confirmed who will keep w’s secrets
I don’t want to high jack the thread again since we’ve discussed the possibility two times already but is at least one candidate that fits the bill
albert fall @ 19
Shouldn’t there be one more category somewhere for the Gannons of the world ?
Don’t know what the dems will do on the war funding bill. I favor funding ONLY until FALL- with a fresh look then at whether or not the clusterfuck surge is workin- if it ain’t— pull the fuckin plug.
Most americans will be ready by then.
selise @13
Count me in as one of the unhappy. Check that — one of the enraged.
Morris Sheppard @ 11
Either his or Bush’s.
Of course he did
;>)
Morris Sheppard @ 28 -
me too.
It is truly remarkable that we’re now looking at John Ashcroft as a protector of the rights of Americans.
I also think Glenn’s right. They are going to stonewall everything, send everything into court, and violate every they need to in order to run out this clock and hand a democratic president a government riddled with their operatives, a massive budget deficit and a completely broken foreign policy.
Bush has already said the military has been redirecting money from appropriated purposes to the occupation. Leave aside whether that’s actually true. He is asserting that the Congress doesn’t even have the power of the purse, moving him past even John Yoo on the authoritarian side of the political spectrum. He is, in effect, saying that supplemental is ultimately irrelevant, because he is going to continue the occupation even money is not appropriated for it.
The only remedy here is impeachment and conviction. But I don’t think there are more than three republicans with the spines of Bill Cohen or Howard Baker. Or a commitment to what we learn in grade school civics classes.
“How a bill becomes a law.” Remember that? I do, but I don’t remember the part about the white house calling up a senate staffer and telling him to change the contents of the bill that had been passed–expressly to remove Senate oversight over DOJ appointments.
I’d say it boggles the mind–but I already feel like my heads been shaken, over and over again, and the letters have landed cockeyed.
Muzzy @ 27
See comment #15
cl
Selise, thank GOD you said something. I saw this and my head started to explode. I immediately called PELOSI’s office and when I voiced my CONCERN they took my zip code and practically hung up on me. Then I called Boxer’s office. I’m so furious. So, so, so furious and all I can think about is WHERE ARE THE FAMILIES OF THE TROOPS? WHY ARE THEY NOT OUTRAGED? WHY ARE THEY NOT MARCHING AND PROTESTING IN THE STREETS, DAY IN AND DAY OUT, TILL THE TROOPS COME HOME? Has Rove had something put in the water that makes us all APATHETIC?
selise @ 13
love the video!
if only the last line could be true!
Hugs for Jane
Great video and so appropriate to equate these thugs to organized crime. It’s their smug attitude and callous disregard of the law that infuriates me.
Hope all is cool with you.
Muzzy @ 26
And where is Rove?
hwmnbn @ 36
“Paulie? Won’t see him no more.” Wish that were true, as well.
Muzzy @ 26
Fluffers
;>)
spurious @ 37
Puppet master.
Leave teh ‘no-confidence’ vote on-track for a late week vote.
Hopefully, Monica’s testimony will cement any doubt that Bush and Gonzo have been colluding to Obstruct Justice for years.
All the Goopers will sign-on to the ‘no confidence’ vote then.
Nothing better could have happened today than what did - Bush hugged-up close to his sacrificial toady - that’s what we want everyone to see right before Gonzo is revealed to be a prime actor in Bush’s on-going crime of Obstructing Investigations into the White House.
We absolutely want our best Questioners on the SJC - Sen. Whitehouse comes to mind - to probe what Monica knows about the ‘List.’
Monica is being ‘compelled’ to speak, which almost certainly means having to lead the witness - not the time for off-target questioning - our questions should lead straight to real answers about who made the List, managed adds and deletes, and what went on at the Nov. 27th meeting when Gonzo was all-set to pull the trigger on the firings, but postponed it another week.
We shouldn’t be fishing on Wednesday - we should be hunting.
Comey may not have been the first but you can bet he was purged. And I firmly believe one result was the “gumming to death” of the rest of Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame. Like Comey, Fitz would never volunteer that but someone in Congress should ask him!
Muzzy @ 27
Reporter cum personal trainer
TeddySanFran @ 19
Yes, the RGJoe exception does exist, but I don’t know if I can see Lieberman taking the job. PTL.
Pentagon Making Preparations To Keep Tens Of Thousands Of Troops In Iraq For ‘Decades’ http://thinkprogress.org/
Just what we feared!!
perris @ 7
you are the first person I’ve heard bring up business communications. Maybe large corporations really do have fail-safe security in their communications systems but I can’t believe this giant vacuum cleaner in ATT’s closet isn’t a HUGE threat to business privacy. So why no complaints from them?, it never crossed their mind?, it crossed my little mind and I don’t have trade secrets to protect.
although I do love trading secrets
If the thread topic is “Comey for AG — yea or nay?” count me as a big fat nay. I have no interest in the SJC or HJC having to come up with questions to ask the next AG, since he’ll only speak when spoken to.
DoJ needs a vigorous housecleaner, who respects Congressional oversight and the rule of law. America needs an AG who’ll root out the BushBots and evildoers within the department, inspire confidence among the remaining staff, and report willingly and enthusiastically to Congress on progress without being asked.
In other words, we need President Pelosi to appoint a new AG.
rwcole @ 27
I agree. September is the month. September is the date R’s are pointing to (to buy time now) to judge the success of the surge. September is also the last possible time a meaningful policy change can be supported by R’s before the ‘08 elections to staunch their own bloodbath that awaits them at the polls.
Considering the ’surge’ is spit in the ocean compared to what is needed for decisive change, sadly, higher numbers of killed US soldiers is likely all there will be to show for it, and a withdrawal date not agreed on now could be a moot point by then. It can’t happen soon enough though.
jayackroyd @ 33
The money that Defense is using to continue the occupation Iraq is coming from within the Defense Department’s own pool of funds. They were the only ones to have an appropriation bill passed by the Do-Nothing Congress last August.
If the supplemental is not passed, Defense will have to cut some of its activities, as the supplemental would have replaced the funds they have already spent.
By law, Defense can only pull money from its own funds — it can’t touch any of the other appropriation pools and they don’t exist this year, as all the other departments are being funded out of a continuing resolution.
Congress should have insisted that the spending for Iraq was part of Defense’s money in the first place. The supplemental is like doing an end run around the appropriation process.
snowbird42 @ 46
If you want to bring them home fast, find a way to force a Bush family member to serve.
Elliott — the secrets are going to the highest bidder.
We absolutely want our best Questioners on the SJC - Sen. Whitehouse comes to mind - to probe what Monica knows about the ‘List.’
While I agree - it’s the House Committee she’s in front of, unfortunately. So while there is *some* talent on the D side of that committee, the big boys (Whitehouse, et al) don’t have a shot at her - yet.
Bearpaw @ 16
especially since later Albertoe became the ATTORNEY GENERAL!
Elliott @ 47
Eliot, your quote from me has me embarrassed how bad my spelling and grammar on that post, is the typo gnome around to fix?
rwcole @ 28
I’ve been remarking, for a while, that I don’t think anybody is getting out of this any time soon. Scarecrow’s post about his airplane conversation (now there’s a Sunday thread topic–airplane conversations) with the army engineer reinforced this.
The US has built a massive infrastructure in Iraq. It’s hardened, defended against any plausible regional threat. It’s set up to house about 50,000 soldiers. It’s not a secret. George Packer’s been to a couple of them. Folks posted details about them in Scarecrow’s thread. The engineer wasn’t violating security regs by talking about them.
But they are not part of the political discussion. At all. We don’t hear Clinton talking about what will happen with these American assets. Richardson has spoken out most clearly about leaving no troops, at all, behind. But that’s not really plausible. Defending the embassy will require a substantial force.
Everybody else (except Gravel) has left wiggle room for going with the original plan announced by Cheney–a permanent 50,000 soldier presence.
We need to call them on this. There is going to be an unprecedented level of citizen questions that can cut through the blather that dominates presidential candidate presentations. MoveOn’s Town Hall was a great start. IMO, that event pushed all of the candidates to make a clearer statement on ending the occupation.
But I still don’t believe them. I’d feel way better if I felt like could believe them. Do you? Do you think [fill in candidate here] will actually leave “no residual presence?”
Brisingamen 50 — your analysis is tempting, but contains an enormous BushCo loophole, in this single two-word phrase:
Wonderful, Jane! But I’ve been saying for a while now that Ashcroft was the first purge in Feb 05 (they had to wait til after the 04 election & Jan swearing-in), and then Comey came later (4/05).
One other thing, found at HuffPo, by Robert Greenwald: a handy 2-minute video making the case for
Gonzo’sFredo’s impeachment, plus a petition.Worth watching and passing on. Impeachment is the best — and truly only — solution!
TeddySanFran @ 19
‘ah, the smell of hollow points in the morning…’
;>)
Leapfrogging over the comments for the moment, let me ask for help priming the pump on Gonzales. If anyone knows of any proposed articles of impeachment that have been formally drafted against Gonzo-boy, please drop by at the link above, click on the discussion tab, and leave us a note, please.
And then look around at what we’ve developed so far elsewhere on the site.
Bob in HI
Jane Hamsher @ 45
During the 2006 Connecticut Senate race, id any dirt come out on Joey Short Ride that was not sufficient to persuade (enough of) the voters of Connecticut, but that might make appropriate grounds for derailing an AG appointment? Any hint of scandal, conflict of interest, conduct unbecoming an Attorney General? If so it should be exploited to the fullest.
Muzzy
Yep
Better of course to pull the plug now but that appears to be impossible.
I’m still laughing about the “slavering bichon freses” from below. hehehehehe And count me in as wondering just exactly how Comey was shoved out the DoJ door, because everything that I have heard about the man is that he would have stayed, clawing and scratching to the very end to save the integrity of the institution from the Bush hacks. He does have kids — and kids come with college expense planning — but he’s the public service is a calling sort through and through from everyone that I have ever spoken with who has known him through the years. Which says to me there is a very interesting story to be heard somewhere in the mix…
Robert Greenwald’s newest Gonzo video. They were just talking about how effective this is on NPR’s Marketplace.
O/T
Anybody read this?
Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency
TeddySanFran @ 57
I’m a Federal employee — in one of the agencies that didn’t have its appropriation bill passed. I know what our A/O is going through trying to get the essentials done on the limited money we received.
Doing supplementals was the Bushies way of getting around the law. Except now they don’t have the Do-Nothing Congress any more…
dalloway @ 43
Good point.
Comey and Fitz come from the same ilk…
If they ask, they will tell the truth…
OK.. so what happens if he does refuse to go voluntarily? Will the members of Congress impeach him? Get him disbarred (um.. can a non-lawyer serve as AG legally?)? Take him off their Christmas card lists? Give him hard stares in the corridors? Concede victory to shrub? Agree let shrub formally suspend Congress (probably unnecessary, since in this scenario, Congress would have effectively suspended itself)?
ImpeachmentHappens @ 34
well, i think people (progressive blogosphere) are hoping that speaker pelosi (and our other D leaders) have a plan to end the war and want to give her the benefit of the doubt.
i don’t think we’re apathetic. seems more like wait-and-see mode to me. (not that i think that’s the most productive mode to be in right now). personally, i don’t have a good feeling about this… and haven’t since moveon whipped the out of iraq caucus to vote for h.r.1591.
maybe we’ll see that every turns out ok. but, it doesn’t hurt to make the call…
neurophius @ 61
rather then scandal we need to look at irresponsible decisions and statements
things likewhen he said something to the effect;
“critisizing the president gives aid and comfort to the enemy” (in other words he called congress traitors)
they need to hammer things like THAT;
“this senator had the NERVE to call members of congress engaged in oversite TRAITORS, his judgement is NOT acceptable as ag”
BING, punish him for being bush’s cabana boy
sporkovat @ 17
Well, we could start by priming the pump!
Bob in HI
EPU’d Jane. Check your email.
perris @ 55
707. I thought those were intentional. I’ve had a lengthy internal debate about whether people intentionally type “teh” or not. I’ve concluded that, at least, when referring to “teh Google” or “teh internets” it’s intended.
Hard to know, sometimes, what’s behind the pixels.
You know, the google toolbar has a spellcheck function. Lotsa stuff in dis post is underlined as misspelled (but not “dis” which illustrates the limits of spell checkers))
If Speaker Pelosi goes along with this troop funding without accountability, she’ll have a primary next year. Perhaps not a threatening one, but one that at least FOXNews will cover.
OfT: I quite liked epiphame
perris @ 10
Don’t forget the power of the purse. The progressive blogosphere raises money for progressive candidates!
Heard Howard Dean on Air America earlier today. I don’t know who was interviewing him, but he asked Dean how it felt to be 4 years ahead of his time! Having aggressively campaigned for Dean because of his anti-war stance and because I thought he could kick Bush’s arse up and down Pennsylvania Ave. just by sheer brain power, I had to smile. Back then, everyone thought I was possessed or something. But I was right. We were right.
This was my first experience with netroots. I’ve been hooked ever since, having to tear myself away when I get too emotionally involved, as I did with Dean.
Perhaps all I could see was Dean at that time, but I felt I was part of something new and special and that little peopole like me could actually make a difference by raising lots of money over the Net for the person we wanted to be president. Well, we did raise tons of money, but we failed. No amount of money can compete with a rabid media hell-bent on destroying a threatening candidate.
But he really put netroots on the map for me. And it has become an increasingly successful way to support and fund candidates who stand with us in our positions. And in a way, Dean did become a success, a quiet success, working with the DNC, developing election strategies, countering, somewhat, DLC, Corp., and emphasizing grass and netroots.
It is sad it had to take 4 years for the people to see the light, but without netroots, I truly feel it would have taken much longer, a Vietnam sort of scenario. So slowly, the progressive blogosphere is making a difference by shaming the msm with the stellar journalism of people like Christy, Jane and all the other excellent FDL bloggers.
Just imagine what things might be like had we not had this “revolution.” And it’s only a matter of time before people like Jane & Christy will be sitting across the desk from Punkinhead on a find Sunday morn! ;)
I still love you, Howie. And thanks for everything.
TeddySanFran @ 75
ever wonder why there is a word “nonchalant” when there is no word “chalant”…have you ever seen someone walking along “chalantly”? or with “chalance”?
“subterfuge”…anyone ever see something done with “terfuge”?
what is “subterfuge”?, below “terfuge”?
“The only thing worse than being vilified by the left,” says Comey with a laugh, “is being idolized by the left.”
Too late! With the probable exception of Mary, we adore him for standing up and fighting against something really evil.
Comey as AG…that would be amazing.
as I said on a previous thread, there is someone who will definately get confirmed who will keep w’s secrets
Joe Lieberman? Is he an attorney?
Would Lieberman turn down an opportunity for self-aggrandizement? There will be some things discovered that might make Lieberman blush but also make the revealer a hero. Nah.. I guess not.
We already know there existed a major plan to purge and replace all non-Bushie USA’s with Pat Robertson’s Regent U crackerjack law grads.
The things they wanted the non-cooperating (Republicans All) attys to do must have been brazenly unlawful acts. They were promised protection from on high (Gonzo)and still refused to perform as required. What the purged attys feared came about when the toothless (so far)Democrats overtook Congress.
TJ @ 65
Oh yeah, I went on a rant about that one.
I wouldn’t trust him to run a lemonade stand in Hell….
The democrats are so weak! If there is a no-confidence vote in the senate, no republicans will vote with the democrats. Not a single one. Not even those who have told Gonzales to resign. They ALWAYS vote in lockstep with the president. Then we’ll be shocked and amazed and Gonzales will stay as AG. That’s my prediction.
hackworth @ 79
Joey Short Ride is (or has been) an attorney. He served as Attorney General of Connecticut.
TeddySanFran @ 9
Typical Tweedy style over substance - sad little failed Irish/American.
And seeings he isn’t doing anything else like, say, oversight or anything.
Bastard.
neurophius @ 82
he is gonna be their guy if abu torture leaves, this is my prediction
he will beleive it will be his first step toward being on the republican’s ticket in o8 as running m8
Tweety’s got Ken Blackwell on next, just a heads-up for all you masochistic Buckeyes….
I have to admit I don’t have any friends or family in the military but I would think that if I did, I would feel like we don’t have the LUXURY of taking a wait and see approach given how many US troops are killed and maimed every single day.
I just called and voiced my dismay to my Rep., Berman, Pelosi, Boxer, Hoyer and the DCCC. I tried the DNC but their offices are now closed.
Franky, I don’t know who else to call or what else I can do.
I’m open to suggestions…
well, i think people (progressive blogosphere) are hoping that speaker pelosi (and our other D leaders) have a plan to end the war and want to give her the benefit of the doubt.
i don’t think we’re apathetic. seems more like wait-and-see mode to me. (not that i think that’s the most productive mode to be in right now). personally, i don’t have a good feeling about this… and haven’t since moveon whipped the out of iraq caucus to vote for h.r.1591.
maybe we’ll see that every turns out ok. but, it doesn’t hurt to make the call…
They need the Justice Department in friendly hands in order to continue with their plans, already well advanced, to steal the 2008 election.
It’s going to be a race against time. We need to put our thinking caps on. This one can be lost. President Giuliani, responding to another false flag attack? Everything we are fighting for is at stake.
As I recall, Lieberman met the Clintons at Yale law school. He’s a lawyer. There is no reason I can see for a just reelected senator to take an 18 month gig in a quicksand mired administration- and there is no reason I can think of for Clusterfuck to offer it. I think this is a very red herring.
perris @ 77
at least weather can be inclement or clement, depending on how it feels that day.
rwcole @ 89
I surely hope I am wrong because joe will provide more of the same.
I’m gonna hope I’m wrong rw
i put this in a comment a few days ago, but don’t know if you-all saw it:
from Nell, i see that this week we did get our vote in the house on the “don’t attack iran w/o congressional approval” notion (thomas link):