![]() |
|
| Home day care providers and union organizers celebrate Gov. Spitzer's announcement that he has granted union rights to providers. | |
The public-sector union AFSCME and AFT, which represents teachers across the nation, won a big victory late last week when New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer signed an executive law that gives bargaining rights to the city’s 28,000 home child care providers and the more than 20,000 home care workers outside of New York City. Lots of people think workers don’t join unions because they don’t want to. The nation’s flawed federal labor laws are a big reason standing in workers’ way. But this example illustrates yet another reason why U.S. workers are hampered from easily forming unions. New York’s day care workers, like home care workers in California and Illinois, and others across the nation, can’t just automatically form unions.
The day care workers, who, on average, are paid less than $19,000 a year and have no pensions, health insurance or paid sick days, first needed a law that gave them an employer—in this case the state’s Office of Children and Family Services—before they could join a union and negotiate a contract. The New York United Federation of Teachers/AFT (UFT/AFT) will work with the day care workers, and AFSCME’s Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA) will reach out to the home care workers.
UFT/AFT Vice President Michelle Bodden has worked on securing this victory, and she’s guest blogging for me today to share why this law is so important.
…………………………………………………………..
On May 11, Gov. Spitzer came to New York City for a press conference on Labor History Month. He talked about the state’s grand past in the union movement, and at the end of his remarks, almost as an afterthought, he told the assembled group that he had signed an executive order giving home child care providers the right to unionize. The room erupted with cheering and clapping—we were witnessing a moment in the history of the labor movement in New York.
Why is this so important? For the day care providers first: In New York City as a group, they are overwhelmingly women, largely African American and Latina (40 percent speak Spanish as their first language) and grossly undervalued. The providers care for the children of families transitioning from welfare to work, and many times their own situations are as difficult as the families they serve. The subsidies they are paid are based on the age of the child, $150 per week for a toddler, divided over a five-day week with hours from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., which equals $3 per hour (of course, if a parent is late, the hours are longer).
Very limited funds are available for food, so providers often use money from their own pockets for food along with diapers, toys and educational materials. The bureaucracies involved in licensing and payments are immense and difficult to navigate—we’ve heard many horror stories. And to top it off, payments are often made late or not at all for a wide variety of bureaucratic reasons. Even before the executive order, we won more than $150,000 in back pay owed to providers for up to two years. That these women continue to do this work with all of these hurdles is a testament to their dedication and love of children.
Providers are considered independent contractors, although they have little to no ability to determine the terms of their work. The rates are set by the state, the licensing requirements are set by the state and administered by the city. They answer to the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, the New York City Administration for Children’s Services, the New York City Health Department and the New York City Fire Department. No single person can move so many agencies. That’s why, the executive order allowing providers to unionize means they can collectively have their voices heard around issues that are critical to their livelihood.
What does this mean for the UFT? Our union undertook the drive to unionize home child care providers for two main reasons—educationally, this is an extraordinary opportunity to work with children’s first teachers. Providers see children before they come into the public school system, and many of them want to prepare those children for success. Early grade teachers have a good sense of the skills and background experiences that make the most difference with young children. It is a natural mesh to combine the providers with the public school teachers and create a seamless transition for youngsters with the best preparation possible.
The UFT Teachers Center offers free classes for providers on infant/toddler development through preschoolers. The classes are extremely popular because providers want to learn more about creating high quality educational environments—they want their youngsters to succeed. Eventually, we can create a real leveling of the playing field—making a pathway for low-income students to gain the kind of rich vocabulary and other prerequisites that bode for success in school and in life.
The other reason is exactly the same as the reason why this is a great event for the union movement in general: It is our mission to improve the lives of working people, not just the members we have now, but all working people. Many of the gains of labor, from the minimum wage to a defined workweek, extend to millions of workers who are not in unions.
Here with the providers is the opportunity to improve the lives of an undervalued, underappreciated, yet essential group of workers whose work benefits us all. It is not only the responsibility of a union to enable workers to form unions when they want to do so—it is our privilege to do so. This is a living demonstration of the ideals that are the core of the union movement: the power of workers to join together and collectively improve their quality of life and dignity at work.
Related posts:
- AFL-CIO Threatens to Cut Aid to ConservaDems Who Don’t Vote for Health Care
- Peggy Noonan: Health Care Protests Haven’t “Gotten Out of Hand”, Just “Plenty of Booing”
- Happy Labor Day, Progressives; Conservatives, Get Back to Work
- AFL-CIO President Trumka: Union-Blue Dog Relationship Changing, Filibustering Health Care Un-American
- Thinking About the Union Members I Have Known






Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

zed?
Hi Tula!
Congrats on the win! Children are worth alot and so is their care.
Hi Tula!
mods I think ” big reason” in the post is a broken link
thank you tula, great news!
This is fabulous–lets hope that this ability will be extended to home health care aids/workers!!!!
And good for Spitzer.
Good for them!
I know first hand how hard that job is and the hurdles involved.
My ex convinced me into turning my house into a daycare.
What. a. nightmare.
Long story short, these folks deserve a LOT more pay for what they deal with.
BTW, Got rid of the ex and sold the house hours before foreclosure.
She made a lot of money doing it and I still don’t know where it went. Good riddance.
lolo @ 2
Hi, Everyone! Glad to be back and feeling better.
this was quite an accomplishement, was it hard to achieve or were the arguments so obvious that it was easy to convince?
Just goes to show you the importance of having a good governor.
Congrats!
for those who may not be done with “gumming it to death” there is still a lively exchange going on back there.
I’m going to do Devil’s Advocate here, because what I see this doing is pricing single mothers out of the workforce and onto Welfare because of potentially exhorbitant rates from the now-unionized daycare providers.
I was fortunate enough to have a daycare provider one block from my home when my daughter was small. She asked for $120 per week, and we provided our own “sack lunch and snack” for the kids, brought them already breakfast-fed and were responsible for their evening meal. Those with infants paid somewhat more, but provided their own wipes, diapes and other essentials.
If we left the kids there past 5:45, we paid $2/hour overtime.
Now, for a provider watching 1 child, that’s slave wages. However, “Aunt Bea” watched 8 kids. That’s $960 per week plus overtime (although rare), and most of the kids were in school for at least a good 4 or more hours a day.
If I’d had to pay “minimum wage” to Bea to watch my daughter, I would not have been able to afford to feed or clothe or house either of us.
Hearing about this unionizing – especially here in Illinois – makes me exceptionally glad that my daughter is grown and I don’t have to worry about that anymore.
Tula, thank you for posting the blog post and thanks to the firedoglake community for being committed to the values of social and economic justice. I’ll be around intermittently this afternoon and am happy to answer any questions you have about the organizing drive.
I hate to be OT but this is exciting: Novak reports that a former Rove aid now seeks immunity to testify before a Congressional committee investigating government corruption surrounding convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/….._0517.html
Congrats! And please add a jump at the dotted line!
Having had twins I was priced out of daycare. Had to quit the job and stay home with the munchkins. Unless you receive wellfare subsidies, here in Kawliifornya, it’s quite expensive.
Wooohoooo… about damn time…
And Sewmouse, I remember the days when the first 4 ours of work of my workday paid for my daycare. BUT I was glad to pay it too, after all, I was a nurse and taking care of your granny AND my children were well cared for.
Wake up and understand that our children are our future, they should have the best schools, healthcare and child care. Just who will be running this country and making the decisions that will effect us in our golden years… those children.
katymine @ 18
well cared for is the key. It sounds like UFT/AFT have established important training programs to help.
hmmm
must be more toobZ trouble
Elliot: It was hard, people agreed with the goal but action took time. The NY legislature did pass a bill last year but Gov. Pataki vetoed the bill.
Sewmouse: There is no overtime pay; if a child is less than full day the rate is lower. Providers are paid by vouchers from the state and they are serving are people coming off welfare. So this won’t make life harder for these families; it should give them more options because providers will stay in the field longer.
OFF topic, sorry to do it so soom but this is big and breaking on cnn senate is looking for a vote of no confidence for abu torture
my questions as follows;
so what?
the president will use the vote of no confidence as another excuse to dig his heels deeper in, claining it doesn’t matter what confidence congress has it’s his confidence that counts
I like teachers and others who take care of our kids. Just had to say it.
Hurray! Back in the day, I was a licensed early childcare provider. A single parent of two young boys was interested in trading with me, his carpentry for my childcare. He was gleeful about how much more childcare he’d get in return for the small amount of carpentry he’d have to do for me.
I asked him which was the more important task, his children’s welfare or my cabinets. He said his children’s well being. But, he did not offer to give me a raise nor did we do a trade. Neither of us could afford to do so.
Any early childcare providers should be reimbursed and supported and encouraged to get pertinent education. Our children are so important, they are the hope of our future and the joy of our present.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 23
Why aren’t they paid more? For that matter, why don’t any of the professions that involve caring for the weakest, most helpless of human beings and God’s creatures pay well?
It’s what Jesus would do.
I’m sorry, but this is OT for this thread, however, I have to run out, and wanted someone to take a look at the timing of the following in light of Comey’s testimony:
In a Senate floor speech on April 8, 2004, Senate Judiciary Committee
Ranking Member Patrick Leahy (D-VT) revealed that “On June 19, 2002,
Senator Grassley and I sent a letter to the Office of the Inspector
General regarding allegations mad by an FBI whistleblower that posed
several important questions about the problems in the FBIs translator
program that have never been addressed.”
FBI Director Robert Mueller asked Attorney General Ashcroft to
invoke State Secret Privilege in order to block evidence documents
in Sibel Edmonds’ lawsuit from the judge hearing her case but also
from public access. The seldom-used executive privilege also
effectively gagged Edmonds from publicly discussing what she
discovered in the pre-9/11 intelligence wiretaps.
Leahy added “On March 2, 2004, I sent a letter to the Attorney
General and FBI Director Mueller repeating some of what I asked
before and asking about new issues that have since been raised.
Needless to say, no answers have been forthcoming.” Leahy has not
alluded thus far as to how he and Senator Grassley will handle the
FBI and DOJ defiance.
On April 11, 2004 Edmonds sent a letter to Grassley and the Judiciary
Committee–but also the 9-11 Commission–wherein she enumerated
questions for FBI Director Mueller’s testimony, implying that the
Bureau allowed several top targets of FBI [terrorist] investigations
to leave the U.S. months after the attacks without questioning them.
She also raised a question directed to Mueller as to whether
information from investigations concerning terrorists and their
supporters’ activities was intentionally blocked and whether FBI
field agents re-sent blocked or mistranslated information to the
Washington field office to be checked again due to suspicions about
original translations.
More explosively, however, was Edmonds’ question for Mueller as to
whether it was true that administrative personnel, after becoming
aware that [pre-9/11] translations were being intentionally blocked
and mistranslated, engaged in cover-ups and never provided [FBI]
field agents with accurate translations.
Dems seek no-confidence vote on Gonzales
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18716394/
IIRC,last year WA state did the same thing for it’s daycare providers.
A very good thing.
Mandrake @ 25
Perhaps not what George would.
Paul @ 27
I know this is o/t but in the NYT article on this, I thought this was interesting…
http://www.nytimes.com/aponlin…..ref=slogin
Perhaps the “cult of the free market” is finally losing its grip on government.
Georgesimian @ 30
Bush doesn’t know what happened and he didn’t want to admit that Cheney’s really in charge.
Thank you Tula for this important piece. It’s amazing that somebody would oppose this.
Badwater @ 32
Bush is saying, once again, fuck you.
Georgesimian @ 34
Honestly, now. Wouldn’t we all be shocked if he didn’t?
;)
Sounds as if the Gonzo thing is heatin up. Dems have a “no confidence” vote scheduled for next week and predict that it will be a fillibuster proof vote. The key thing is to show that there are a significant number of goopers willing to cross the prez on this issue. You can bet that Clusterfuck will send his merry men out to threaten goopers with somethin worse than death if they cross him- but this thing’s gettin too ugly for many of em to take lyin down. Should be fun.
Now we’ve got Clusterfuck refusing to talk about his role in the great Ashcroft heist . Oops- smells like another illegal action by this genius.
When ya wake up on a bad day- you can always say “Well at least I ain’t Clusterfuck- he’s havin a REALLY bad day!!”
I posted this earlier, but in light of the no-confidence vote called for just now, some of you might find this insightful:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/b…..7/loyalty/
Blumenthal goes through the list of loyal bushies and examines the varying conditions and ramifications of leaving the circle of trust.
This post has been linked at DKos now.
Good work Tula.
I know that day care workers in the city may have to deal with the HRA as well as ACS. Just an FYI.
Georgesimian @ 30
IOW…”I sent ‘em to do this.” And the only “speculation” about it isn’t if it happened…Comey testified UNDER SWORN OATH THAT IT DID! The speculation is what the “law” ewas that needed the Atty General’s signature on it was about, and whether Bush told his WH Counsel and Chief-OF-STAFF TO COMPEL A DRUGGED-UP ATTY GENERAL TO SIGN THE RELEASE!
It’s pretty apparent that Bush DID ORDER THEM TO DO IT. He basically wants the “speculation” to go away. But if he really wants the specualtion to stop all he has to do is tell us “My Chief-Of-Staff and WH Counsel did this utterly on their own and without consulting me.” Yeah sure! Like that would occur…and if it DID that would be more than enough cause to FIRE and commit both to Gitmo.
After all, they were trying to coerce the Attyt General in signing the renewal of a law that they knew was considered illegal and UnConstitutional by the Atty General!
I’d think that the President, if he thought this was an inappropriate act would have fired both these men for what essentially amounts to a coup-de-tat! IF HE DIDN’T ORDER THE ACT HIMSELF!
Neither man was “disciplined”…in fact, it was Comey that was brought in and pressured…then the WH continued to operate using the law, and when Ashcroft was replaced by Gonzalez they simply when back to using the illegal old version that Ashcroft, Comey and others in the DOJ stated was UnConstitutional.
Bush knew, he was the one that thought up the scheme, and was the one that then posted Gonzo to do the illegal acts when he appointed him to replace Ashcroft!
The evil of this WH is beyond all comprehension!
Can’t they ask Ashcroft’s wife who called?
It’s all about “dignity”. Or dignity denied.
.
Can anyone imagine if Clinton would have uttered these words in response to questions about Monica Lewinsky. The extent to which bush believes he is not responsible for explaining things to the American people is truly astonishing.
Workers of America unite! Do not take what Bush and the GOP are dishing out laying down.
Bustednuckles @ 38
Woo Hoo Tula!
DKos also has an inspiring post on the possibility of relecting President Al Gore that is a must read IMHO. ;~)
The DLC is not pro-labor. They are in fact untrue to actual Democratic principles.
Bush said of Blair today: “He is a respected man”. By who Mr. President? Certainly not you.
AP – Steadfast allies President Bush and Tony Blair on Thursday strongly defended their decision to go to war in Iraq and to remain there, despite rising opposition in both the United States and Britain and their own plunging approval ratings.
My ex and I pay $45/week for subsidized day care in canada. While I am glad that unionized childcare workers will make more money, I would much rather see some articles talking about subsidizing day care here in the United States. In Philadelphia, I would have to pay $300/ week AT LEAST for day care.
FYI, new thread
Before you conclude that your child care provider made a lot of money you should understand the she had many expenses (food, toys, supplies, gas, utilities, etc.). In addition she had wear and tear on her home. The average provider spends about 37% of her income on expenses. Tom Copeland
Sewmouse @ 13
Can totally relate!!!!
It’s great that they can unionize. No doubt about it. They will be much better off, and surely Ms. Weingarten and her patronage mill will not dare treat them as they’ve treated working teachers in this city, who traded twenty plus years of gains in 2005 for a contract that didn’t even meet cost of living in NYC.
What’s not so great is that teachers may become a minority in the UFT, and our interests and concerns are not necessarily the same as those of nurses and day care providers.
Ex-US Secretary of Educaton Rod Paige, who called the NEA a “terrorist organization,” did not express admiration for UFT President Randi Weingarten because she’s improving the lot of working teachers. Under Ms. Weingarten’s tenure, our prep time has been cut in half, our workload has expanded, our days are longer, our year is longer, we’re subject to unpaid suspensions for months based on unsubstantiated allegations, and our seniority rights have been severely abridged.
Ms. Weingarten just won re-election with only about 20% of working teachers even bothering to vote. Apathy rules our union, and patronage thrives even as working conditions are the worst I’ve ever seen. My school hovers over 250% capacity and most of the country has little or no idea what goes on in Mr. Bloomberg’s New York.
Today’s LA Times suggested that LA teacher unions follow in Ms. Weingarten’s backward march. While such moves may gladden the hearts of demagogues like Paige, they’re very poor precedents for working people.
I have a daughter who talks of becoming a teacher, and I think it behooves us to leave things better, not worse, for those who will follow us.
I’m not sure anyone answered Sewmouse’s main point. Let me rephrase it this way:
Suppose a single-working mother has two kids. How much will she have to pay for day care?
(Note: this is not a criticism, this is simply an attempt to get more information before I form an opinion).