<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deadlines For Thee, But None For Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:29:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lf</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697528</link>
		<dc:creator>lf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 04:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Or a concave mirror, such as those used for applying makeup.  The mirror acts like a lens and does not laterally reverse what’s reflected.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or a concave mirror, such as those used for applying makeup.  The mirror acts like a lens and does not laterally reverse what’s reflected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P J Evans</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697403</link>
		<dc:creator>P J Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 02:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697403</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;#97, 99, and 104&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May I suggest two vertical mirrors touching at right angles (like an open book standing up)? The image will be right way around.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#97, 99, and 104</p>
<p>May I suggest two vertical mirrors touching at right angles (like an open book standing up)? The image will be right way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697397</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 02:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697397</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-697134&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Veritas78 @ 65&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ralston had better have her life insurance paid up. She was Rove’s link with Abramoff. I’d give her immunity if she rolls on the Doughboy, but I’d stash her in a safe house.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“She was Rove’s link with Abramoff.”  That just does not sound right! “Rove’s link with Abramoff”  Scary image!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who in their right mind would want to be that link?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-697134"><em>Veritas78 @ 65</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ralston had better have her life insurance paid up. She was Rove’s link with Abramoff. I’d give her immunity if she rolls on the Doughboy, but I’d stash her in a safe house.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“She was Rove’s link with Abramoff.”  That just does not sound right! “Rove’s link with Abramoff”  Scary image!  </p>
<p>Who in their right mind would want to be that link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Schacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697337</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe this is OT, but I believe this subject came up on FDL before, within the last month or so:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
  &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.claytoncramer.com/weblog/2007_05_13_archive.html#6757811905066984528&quot;&gt;Down the Memory Hole&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Clayton Cramer’s Blog - By Clayton Cramer - May. 16 (Blog Post)&lt;br /&gt;
Remember in 1984, where Winston’s job was to revise newspapers of the past to keep up with the ever changing present? This is very interesting… - &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The story provides specific examples from the Changeable News Network (aka CNN).&lt;br /&gt;
This is a bit scary. Fortunately, there are those archive sites? that keep copies of stuff online, in case it gets taken offline? These are independently owned and operated websites, but unfortunately I can’t remember where they’re kept. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those sites have been handy for gov stuff that gets taken down. For example, the Clinton administration did a lot of stuff on the Digital Divide that the Bushies didn’t like, so about 4 months after Bush was inaugerated in 2000, reports on the digital divide on gov websites started disappearing. Sorry, I don’t have time to chase down references now, but if someone wants’em, I can provide examples. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those web archives become even more important now, in the face of these attempts to revise history. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is OT, but I believe this subject came up on FDL before, within the last month or so:</p>
<blockquote><p>
  <b><a href="http://www.claytoncramer.com/weblog/2007_05_13_archive.html#6757811905066984528">Down the Memory Hole</a></b><br />
Clayton Cramer’s Blog &#8211; By Clayton Cramer &#8211; May. 16 (Blog Post)<br />
Remember in 1984, where Winston’s job was to revise newspapers of the past to keep up with the ever changing present? This is very interesting… &#8211; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>The story provides specific examples from the Changeable News Network (aka CNN).<br />
This is a bit scary. Fortunately, there are those archive sites? that keep copies of stuff online, in case it gets taken offline? These are independently owned and operated websites, but unfortunately I can’t remember where they’re kept. </p>
<p>Those sites have been handy for gov stuff that gets taken down. For example, the Clinton administration did a lot of stuff on the Digital Divide that the Bushies didn’t like, so about 4 months after Bush was inaugerated in 2000, reports on the digital divide on gov websites started disappearing. Sorry, I don’t have time to chase down references now, but if someone wants’em, I can provide examples. </p>
<p>Those web archives become even more important now, in the face of these attempts to revise history. </p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697292</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“principles”? What use has a Republican of “principles”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“principles”? What use has a Republican of “principles”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordsmith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697291</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly, Helen, exactly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Helen, exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697285</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-697275&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wordsmith @ 130&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; couldn’t believe Specter would even question why Comey would want to resign anyway, regardless of the time frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I could not believe Spector’s questions.  They were quite telling. He said something like, “but they weren’t threatening to fire you, why would you go?” and he kept harping at it. I was blogging in the thread and I  “screamed”  at Spector that Comey had &lt;em&gt;principles.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-697275"><em>Wordsmith @ 130</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Still, <b>I</b> couldn’t believe Specter would even question why Comey would want to resign anyway, regardless of the time frame.</p>
<blockquote><p>COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>I could not believe Spector’s questions.  They were quite telling. He said something like, “but they weren’t threatening to fire you, why would you go?” and he kept harping at it. I was blogging in the thread and I  “screamed”  at Spector that Comey had <em>principles.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordsmith</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697275</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Still, &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; couldn’t believe Specter would even question why Comey would want to resign anyway, regardless of the time frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, <b>I</b> couldn’t believe Specter would even question why Comey would want to resign anyway, regardless of the time frame.</p>
<blockquote><p>COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank33</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697274</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697274</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;9-11-01: Day 0&lt;br /&gt;
9-11-02: Day 364  No. Day 365.&lt;br /&gt;
Note, Dec 31. day 0, Jan 1 day 1, Dec 31, day 365&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I still say 912 days.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9-11-01: Day 0<br />
9-11-02: Day 364  No. Day 365.<br />
Note, Dec 31. day 0, Jan 1 day 1, Dec 31, day 365</p>
<p>I still say 912 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697266</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/16/deadlines-for-thee-but-none-for-me/#comment-697266</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-697247&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;LS @ 124&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: Right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And you stated that the next day, Thursday, was the deadline for reauthorization of the program, is that right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMEY: Yes, sir.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: OK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you tell us what happened the next day?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMEY: The program was reauthorized without us and without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting as to its legality. And I prepared a letter of resignation, intending to resign the next day, Friday, March the 12th.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: OK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that was the day, as I understand it, of the Madrid train bombings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMEY: Thursday, March 11th, was the morning of the Madrid train bombings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: And so, obviously, people were very concerned with all of that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMEY: Yes. It was a very busy day in the counterterrorism aspect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: Yet, even in light of that, you still felt so strongly that you drafted a letter of resignation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMEY: Yes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: OK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And why did you decide to resign? COMEY: I just believed…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHUMER: Or to offer your resignation, is a better way to put it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Touche’ I am now as confused as you are as to why Schumer brought up the bombings.  I’m gonna go back and look also, because it was a year a a half later that Comey left.  &lt;em&gt;What changed his mind?&lt;/em&gt; I thought it was the bombings.  Thanks LS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-697247"><em>LS @ 124</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>SCHUMER: Right.</p>
<p>And you stated that the next day, Thursday, was the deadline for reauthorization of the program, is that right?</p>
<p>COMEY: Yes, sir.</p>
<p>SCHUMER: OK.</p>
<p>Can you tell us what happened the next day?</p>
<p>COMEY: The program was reauthorized without us and without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting as to its legality. And I prepared a letter of resignation, intending to resign the next day, Friday, March the 12th.</p>
<p>SCHUMER: OK.</p>
<p>And that was the day, as I understand it, of the Madrid train bombings.</p>
<p>COMEY: Thursday, March 11th, was the morning of the Madrid train bombings.</p>
<p>SCHUMER: And so, obviously, people were very concerned with all of that.</p>
<p>COMEY: Yes. It was a very busy day in the counterterrorism aspect.</p>
<p>SCHUMER: Yet, even in light of that, you still felt so strongly that you drafted a letter of resignation.</p>
<p>COMEY: Yes.</p>
<p>SCHUMER: OK.</p>
<p>And why did you decide to resign? COMEY: I just believed…</p>
<p>SCHUMER: Or to offer your resignation, is a better way to put it?</p>
<p>COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Touche’ I am now as confused as you are as to why Schumer brought up the bombings.  I’m gonna go back and look also, because it was a year a a half later that Comey left.  <em>What changed his mind?</em> I thought it was the bombings.  Thanks LS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
