President Rexall Ranger just luuuvs him some deadlines. Remember this from March 17, 2003?
Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict, commenced at a time of our choosing. For their own safety, all foreign nationals — including journalists and inspectors — should leave Iraq immediately.
High noon, or midnight, or something. Definitely a deadline. When violence raged prior to the first Iraqi election, and a threatened Sunni boycott which would virtually guarantee a permanent and violent divide in Iraq, our Rexall Ranger stood firm on the deadline of January 30, 2005:
President Bush yesterday flatly ruled out any delay in Iraqi elections scheduled for Jan. 30 despite the unrelenting insurgency, rejecting Sunni Muslim boycott threats and framing the vote as a critical step toward bringing U.S. troops home.
In his strongest reaffirmation of the election plan, Bush attempted to end any doubt about whether the vote would go forward after days of debate among Iraqi politicians. Organizations representing the once-powerful Sunni minority have demanded the elections be put off until security is restored, while leaders of the majority Shiites have insisted the balloting proceed.
“The elections should not be postponed,” Bush said. “It’s time for the Iraqi citizens to go to the polls. And that’s why we are very firm on the January 30th date.”
Sounds like a deadline to me. Then there was the Iraqi constitution. Our Tin Star Texan stuck to his guns:
Bush, who instinctively dismisses doubters and abhors changing course, again stuck to the plan. “We’ve got to keep the deadline there to force the parties to make the hard decisions to reach compromise,” Bush told advisers, according to Hadley.
Dayamm. There’s that word–deadline–coming right out of Dubya’s own mouth–if you can believe Hadley. But we all know what happened on Iraq’s constitution. They were a little late on the deadline, punted on the hard stuff, which are still the main points of contention today, primarily sharing of the revenue. Seems some sillies are having a little trouble rewarding their past tormentors. It is a small wonder Iraq is such a disaster when Dubya peoples his brain trust for the war with people like Douglas Feith:
Former undersecretary of defense Douglas J. Feith, a key architect of the war, said the political process has not been perfect but that Bush was right to stick rigorously to the timetable. “That was a calculation,” he said. “It involved some risk. It turned out not only not to be a disaster but a great success.”
my bold
Uh, yeah Doogie Howitzer, craptacular. Rumor has it Dougie beats the side of head because it feels so good when he stops.
Now the congress attempts to place some deadlines on Bush. But he stamps his baby Gap boots and calls everybody names. Lately he is warming up to the idea of “benchmarks” for Iraqi’s.
It’s not that the President was for deadlines before he was against them before he was for them, it is deadlines that apply to him, or any rules whatsoever, like torture, or habeus corpus, or warrantless wiretapping etc.
There is an expert in field in dealing with these types of people: Supernanny! No one is better at dealing with spoiled brats than her, I mean, Mary Poppins she ain’t. Perhaps we should pass the hat and buy the boxed set for Pelosi and Reid. Or, they can just use the CliffsNotes:
Lower yourself to their level so you can see eye to eye.
Use a stern voice.
Waggle a disapproving finger and say:
“This is unacceptable.”



137 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
ZeD☼
No DEADLINES for YOU! (Deadline Nazi(
Hi Oilfieldguy! I’ll go get the pups.
Hi there OFG! I like it!
Yikes… Big CODE error in the post body. Lot’s of HTML scripting all over it.
Mods? Help porfavor.
The code error is also showing a reference email address. Not sure if you wanted to make an email address that public.
Congratulations, OFG! I cannot read this is jibber jabber and the margins are off. I’ve never had trouble here before. Good luck fixing it!
Great post by the way OFG. I’m sure the mods will be all over it shortly.
EPU’d:
Eureka Springs @ 108
Her are some…as far as I know: Dead Letter Office
Sounds like Nancy P. came along just in time.
I don’t think it’s jibberish…I think it is what Bush said…looks like they way he sounds!
Oilfieldguy!
Nice to see you on the front page.
Finally got out of your truck for a spell, huh?
LS @ 12
Hadn’t thought about it that way. It actually makes more sense that W.
Bustednuckles @ 13
Yeah, but it’s way crowded upstairs. I must’ve been drinking liberally when I posted that!
When they get it fixed, wait’ll you get a load of the artwork supplied by darkblack. Mwahahaha, (in my most sinister daffy duck laff)
Tweets says some Rove e-mails have been turned over to congress. Bet they’re not too juicy.
Tweety just about tore off the head of Repug congressman Kingston of Georgia for trying to compare our situation in Iraq to that in Germany and South Korea following those wars.
so pres bush is a hippocrite. no news.
is there a mod? my margins are messed up.
OFG’s post ends rather abruptly. Is something missing?
Loo Hoo. @ 17
Marcy said ONE email and sent me to a post of hers about it.
My guess it’s the Mods who are going to be drinking liberally tonight!
{{{{{{{{{{ Mods}}}}}}}}}}}}
Oilfieldguy @ 6
Aren’t the MODS just super???
Big hand for the Mods!
neurophius @ 21
Just coherent thinking, and some marbles.
Bush doesn’t believe in deadlines. Except when he does.
Something’s wrong with the Website. Text needs to be liquid, I think that’s the term.
and if i remember right, from the documentary my country, by country, sunni’s were DISCOURAGED from voting AT ALL………..
and oilfieldguy, luv ya, but where’s your conclusionary statement……all you wrote is true, what’s that have to do with the situation now? they were left out, then self-exluded, now militant, now a minority with no voice, SO? now what?
and now for something complety different-monty python
epu’d from last thread and OT;
i have been out of town and completely out of the news for a few days, catching up on threads, on fact for the last month in and out of town and catching up on comments-but i denote a tone of paranoia and outthereness in the comments that i don’t quite understand………..what the hellllll has happened in the last few days that has sent people over the gotta gettum edge?
just feelin’ it and wonderin’ where the hell it’s comin’ from……….just sayin’…….
scuse me, haven’t we got oversight still happening?
scuse me, what were those bills all about?
scuse me, it’s a matter of negotiations, do they matter?
scuse me, what the hell am i missing here?
there seems to be a vehemence bordering on viciousness that is unpalatable, what has happened that it has taken a turn?
i guess i need to read up on the threads and see what i missed.
if i didn’t miss anything, then weelllll, kick your asses back into gear and get out of that nothin’s changed attitude, and get back in the flow of positive change or i’m zappin’ all of you back to teenagehood!!!!!!!!!!!!
cuz us grownups want to know what’s going on REALLY, and what we can do about it………that’s all i’m sayin’……….and man was that hard to say knowin’ how many it will piss off………..
what’s goin on and what can we do about it? measured statement, logical approach. attack with a plan, with a steady stare.
all is not lost. really. change takes time and it is happening in our own backyards, that’s where it starts. and things coming from washington aren’t the usual plate of pancakes lately……..so, what’s next? keep in the game, and it is a game……..how are gonna help our representatives play it out?
OFG!
I heart regex
Mods are feverishly working on it folks. Will be cleared up directly. I have fingers the size of dill pickles, so I’m positive it was something I did.
OFG, I don’t mean to criticise your writing. I just didn’t think it looked quite right. Thought there might be a technical issue. It’s a good post.
Oilfieldguy @ 31
LMAO.
It’s Beer O:clock for me, you all have a great evening.
Catch ya on the next big job OFG!
dmac… I left you a reply…EPU
OT – Looks like KO has a juicy one. Apparently Abu testified (in conf hearings?) that there was no internal fights about the NSA spying program. OOPS!! 4th story after War funding.
been thinking about you, OFG,
tried to send the pups to your site during the Tom Shaller discussion, but think I was too late…
updates please, how did you “market” your successful search for new voters (neighbors and all)…
there were lots of questions about how to convince unmarried women to get themselves to the polls, especially the primaries
Oilfieldguy, Hi!
Hi Eli. I like it just the way it is.
Damn. I meant OFG!!
This whole thing with the deadlines on the first bill submitted was bullshit. They were non-binding. He just thought he could gain some political points. Now he’s wishing he had just signed it and gotten the money.
Also, and I’m not sure why this isn’t brought up more, he could have just used one of his signing statements, like he’s done a thousand times before. Just to clarify that while he’s approving the bill, he can pick and choose which parts he will follow. Because, you know, he’s the decider guy.
Helen @ 35
Recently? Or was that some testimony awhile back? Before the Nov elections?
Josh Marshal has scoopage:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c…..014182.php
Woodhall Hollow @ 41
I think he said in the confermation hearings. Not sure. Will be up in a few minutes.
Woodhall Hollow @ 41
Daily Kos runs it down (linky):
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…..16448/6257
I just got a news alert e-mail from CNN, don’t know if it’s been discussed here, but the Justice Department says it doesn’t have the documents the senate committee is seeking–Rove has them.
Alfred Kelgarries @ 42
Serioulsy,I am getting more than a little pissed with all of this immunity talk. Force them to talk without immunity. If they plead the fifth, there will probably be someone out there who will out their dirty deeds. It’s becomming a circular firing squad.
Alfred Kelgarries @ 42
“Rove’s former assistant, Susan Ralston, is currently seeking immunity to testify before Waxman’s committee. Ralston is a former assistant to Jack Abramoff, the disgraced Washington super-lobbyist and Republican fund-raiser.”
Oh my!
A*P*C is pushing forlegislation called “the Iran counter Proliferation Act of 2007″ S 270 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/…..0:s.00970:
Many of us here in Ohio are deeply disappointed in Senator Sherrod Browns being one of the 42 co-sponsors of this legislation. Many of us here in Ohio worked hard for Sherrod Brown hoping that he would require “hard evidence” to back up claims about Iran or any other country. Especially since this legislation has been drafted and is being shoved down congress’s collective throat by the very same warmongers that brought us the “cakewalk in Iraq’. What is with you Senator Brown? Why did you co-sponsor this radical legislation?
Seems like Senator Sherrod Brown has fallen in with the radical right on Israel. I suggest that Brown listen to Albright, Zinni, Brexinski El Baradei and many other who are pushing for diplomacy with Iran.
Do not adjust the dials; there is nothing wrong with your set. — NSA
dmac,
Comey testified-really scary stuff
Bush met with evangelicals to discuss Iran
Senate vote against Feingold/Reid
Gonzoles and Wolfowitz still fighting for their jobs
Republican “debate”
On and on, on and on, on and on. You know the drill.
Thanks for both of the links Alfred.
It gets better! Josh now reports the proposed appointment of an ACTIVE DUTY 3 star general to an EXECUTIVE dept post as “war czar” raises “major constitutional issues” and may indicate the desire to “place the blame on the generals”. Gee that’d never happen….(linky)
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c…..014183.php
Heh, good to hear from you OFG! Where ya been, lately?
FYI The super mods have fixed the front page already! Great job as usual.
Oilfieldguy: “Deadlines, we don’t need no effing deadlines!” *My bad imitation* Nice job, ofg, I forgot the “get outta dodge” statement from dear leader…
neurophius said:
I just got a news alert e-mail from CNN, don’t know if it’s been discussed here, but the Justice Department says it doesn’t have the documents the senate committee is seeking–Rove has them.
Here’s the link:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITI…..index.html
Helen @ 51
i live but to serve the lake. :)
Scarecrow @ 49
ooo eee ooo
have we reached the outer limits?
Elliott @ 57
Not until Late Nite with the TRex.
neurophius @ 55
close. it says Rove’s LAWYER has them.
Lawyers are officers of the court. a client who ignores a subpoena at worst gets a fine and maybe some jail time. a LAWYER who pulls that can be disbarred. (Lawyers here tonite, IANAL but i think this is correct…)
Kathleen,
Thanks for the links in the prior thread. The Webb amendment, S. 759, is: Latest Major Action: 3/5/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
I would like to hear somebody ask Joe Biden, Chris Dodd and Barack Obama — all three Dem presidential contenders on that committee — if they supported and why it’s still in committee.
Somehow pups, the artwork provided by darkblack got lost in the translation. See his masterpiece here.
This is funny–as I often do, I was reading FDL comments with the TV on in the background. Countdown had broken for commercials, and I wasn’t paying attention to them. I thought I heard an actor playing a politician, making a faux campaign speech–you know, for auto insurance or credit cards or something. I looked at the screen–and it was a Mitt Romney commercial.
Scarecrow @ 53
Supplying an addicted nation.
neurophius @ 62
707
Ralston had better have her life insurance paid up. She was Rove’s link with Abramoff. I’d give her immunity if she rolls on the Doughboy, but I’d stash her in a safe house.
Oilfieldguy @ 61
that’s perfect
neurophius @ 62
so what’s your point? :>:>
Turley on KO,
Alberto must remember everybody threatening to resign. The congressional committee is losing credibility letting him walk out without consequences.
During the 109th congress they couldn’t get a hearing.
He doesn’t see a more clearcut case for impeachment.
The framers gave you the ability and duty to act.
Congress needs the conscience and principle to use their power to impeach.
eureka-on dial up and trying to keep up-plus trying to read threads from this week-you know, since you’re on dial-up that takes a while………probably until tomorrow, saw your comment and left you a reply==sorry to all if my comment was uninformed, just wondered what the defeatest tone was all about…….i don’t believe in it. no matter what has happened…….
quality takes time…….step by step, it takes time to develop, takes time to enact.
eureka (my love, for informing me) last thread
Read Siuns posts on the way the senate bills have devolved (over the last couple of days)
read this post and Janes last post today with the text of the bill that passed today…sigh
and read lhp’s posts and go read Marcy TNH
and come back and panic with us…..
me last thread
MSNBC poll on Tuesday’s GOP Circlejerk: LINK
S 970. Legislation based on “whose” claims an
Olbermann says Monica (Attorneygate)will testify next Wednesday.
Loo Hoo. @ 68
Turly really depressed me. Said that there should be a Special Prosecutor but ultimately it goes back to the Congress. It’s the Congress that has to do the dirty work, even if Pat Fitz himself proves the case.
dmac said,
it is:
neurophius @ 72
my sources say sampson has ratted holy moni out, with docs. if she does an ollie north she’ll be formally charged with perjury; expect then a plea deal in exchange for rove. THAT is why Kommissar Karl’s assistant is suddenly wanting immunity herself…to get in on the love when they take down the big K!
Elliott @ 47
Good news, I guess. I’d like to see Susan and Monica do some payback though.
Helen @ 73
can Congress, if it felt like it, set up a special prosecutor
Here’s another important DEADLINE, so important, that Bush sent his gangsters to the bedside of teh Attorney General who lay in intensive care: 3/11/05.
What was that deadline really about????
Gonzo testified that it was NOT about the wiretapping program. Comey does not confirm or deny what the program was in his testimony yesterday. People are assuming it is about the wiretapping, I beg to differ.
Gonzales in testimony cited in the link below refers to “OPERATIONS”.
Schumer interestingly brought up in testimony yesterday that, somehow coincidentally, it was the same day as the MADRID BOMBINGS.
Is it remotely possible that the “operations” Gonzo so smugly refers to, and considered not certifiably legal by the AG at the time, had something to do with that attack????? I’m not kidding, I think something really stinks about this. If you had this kind of knowledge, you would be angry and freaked out just like Comey was.
http://democrats.senate.gov/jo…..74449&
LS @ 78
jeebus kee-rist are you suggesting madrid was false flag? (where’s my tinfoil hat, dammit…?)
Loo Hoo. @ 76
yeah, I don’t want them to get away with too much. Ralston was like a bag man, wasn’t she?
Turley said Bush renewed (illegally) the “program” some thirty times…said it’s the most impeachable offense he has senn in modern times.
dmac – thanks… hurry back…we may falter but you know we are not defeatists..)
loo hoo at 50
Bush met with evangelicals to discuss Iran
Senate vote against Feingold/Reid
Gonzoles and Wolfowitz still fighting for their jobs
Republican “debate”
On and on, on and on, on and on. You know the drill.
BUSH MET WITH EVANGELICALS TO DISCUSS IRAN????????
now, that i didn’t hear………….holy shit.
has anyone read the books called bible code???????
one and two…….evangelicals have…..and they passed them on to me….math codes used on bible text to determine that osama and bush are predetermined to bring about the apocolypse…….bush is mentioned repeatedly…..it’s all said and done according to the bible code books……..you should read them. i found them quite intrigueing, maybe we should have him on for book salon.
Loo Hoo. @ 68
Cannon Ball!!! (Splash), KO is on Fire tonite!!! This is one for Posterity!!! Impeach the B*st*rds, NOW!!!
Alfred Kelgarries @ 42
Josh Marshal has scoopage:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c…..014182.php
from that article:
According to her friends, she (Susan Ralston) has nothing to say that would cause problems for Rove.
Well, in that case, she’s obviously planning to lie. No immunity for her!
Helen @ 35
But if you look at his quote, he parses quite nicely. Something like ‘there was no conflict over the program that is now in place’.
None of them are as dumb as we think. They are all quite clever (and amoral and unethical and corrupt).
Alfred Kelgarries @ 75
Do you think their house of cards will collapse?
Remember “Heckuvajob, Brownie”? well how about “heckuvajob, Kerrie”? guy who bushco appointed to head family planning (ie kill it) was UNLICENSED, UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR MALPRACTICE and INSURANCE FRAUD. Yep, fully qualified for a post in this administration. (linky)
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/….._0515.html
Elliott @ 86
no way to know yet. but the way things keep coming out, i suspect one day they’ll be a “perfect storm” and then it will all be washed away. ghod I hope so…
solai @ 85
Oh GAWD – see me at 46 – pissed at Ralston immunity talk; and at 73; depressed over Turley remarks. This one put me over the edge. I want my mommy.
Alfred Kelgarries @ 79
I did not bring up the Madrid bombings. Schumer did. It is in the testimony yesterday. Why would he do that? It means he checked up on the date.
Alfred Kelgarries @ 88
you and me both.
I’m still agape from yesterday
Oilfieldguy >
Oh my, The Pusher Man !
“He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils, for time is the greatest innovator.” – Francis Bacon
I’m with you LS, why note the Madrid Bombings?
Alfred 79, this is what Gonzales said when asked what that visit to Ashcroft was about:
“There has not been any serious disagreement, including – and I think this is accurate – there has not been any serious disagreement about the program that the President has confirmed. There have been disagreements about other matters regarding operations, which I cannot get into”
Keith should mention Ron Paul kicking ass on their own poll: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18661344
LS@90
I think Schumer brought up the bombings because that was the reason why Comey ultimately decided to hold off on his resignation. He was definitely outta there on the 11th.
LS @ 90
excuse me. i and my keyboard are hiding under the bed now (dammit monitor won’t fit…grumble…)
Loo Hoo. @ 68
I walked back into the room only to hear part of Turley’s comments.
Did he say anything specifically about the letter from the 4 Dem’c senators and asking Abu if he wanted to change his story?
Alfred Kelgarries @ 97
a well-angled mirror’s a help on that one
Elliot, I don’t know about the special prosecutor appointment. Seems like after Kenneth Starr, they changed the law or funding on that. I don’t know why they couldn’t change it back though.
Elliott @ 93
i think i’m either misreading something or have accidentally slipped on my tinfoil hat again. are we or are we not currently thinking that the “operations” involved the madrid bombings, and that there was something bad going on about them… (disclaimer: i was addicted to tom clancy novels a decade or so ago because they always came out right unlike real life in the spook biz…)…?
solai @ 85
If Gonzales defends himself by saying that he was talking about a different program, then he will have been forced to confess that there is at least one more example of an illegal program having been authorized by Bush. They have been unwilling to do that previously.
Jane has a thread upstairs on Lance Armstrong anti-cancer efforts.
Elliott @ 99
and the ability to read backwards…
Helen @ 96
I am going to go back and find Schumer’s exact wording. I know he made the link first between this important urgent deadline 3/11 and the fact that the Madrid bombings occurred that day.
oilfieldguy at 74
OH MY thank you, thank you……….
This has been a very bad day for progressives. And I’m definitely in a funk. But, I like the Ralston talk. For her to be seeking immunity means that there is real fear in the WH. What;s bothering me is the slow pace of these investigations. And, when they’re corruption/illegal shenanigans are revealed, they STILL don’t leave. None of them have any intention of leaving until they’re hauled away to jail. And, quite frankly, there’s not enough time.
LS @ 78
Remember the thing with the Madrid bombings? They (the administration) via the FBI & Homeland Security allegedly found a link with the Madrid bombings. An attorney in Portland, Oregon, Brandon Mayfield; an American who had converted to Islam.
Whoa, dmac! Jane and Christy, please see dmac at 82!
LS @ 90
One thing that smelled to high heaven about Madrid was that it was 911 days after 911 and don’t forget how they tried to pin it on Jeremy Mayfield
And also the London bombings happened when Rudy Gooliani was in London (what are the odds of that?) during their “surprise” terror attack, or that they were running terror drills at the exact same time as the bombs went off – ala Cheney’s 911 terror drills
Wordsmith @ 108
Good catch. Maybe it was about investigating someone with no reasonable cause in order to blame someone who was innocent to keep the GWOT machine running or something like that. I do not believe that Comey in any way, shape, or form was ever involved in anything sinister, but I can imagine that he and Ashcroft would not want to sign off on something that could give legality to a process (out of their control) that could end up hurting innocent people. I can imagine that if he thought eventually there were enough protections in place, maybe he or Ashcroft could sign off on something. I just don’t know.
Lou Costello @ 95
I’d vote for Paul over some dems.
Wordsmith @ 108
You beat me to the punch (keyboard) about Jeremy Mayfield ;-)
john in sacramento >
To possibly add to the fog of the moment so as to confuse response etc.
Just free associating here, not claiming/suggesting anything…
“…playin with matches in a pool of gasoline…” – Swamp Mama Johnson
Wordsmith @ 98
No, I didn’t hear that. Hopefully John will have it up later.
Helen @ 35
Isn’t this the quote you are referring to?:
“There has not been any serious disagreement, including – and I think this is accurate – there has not been any serious disagreement about the program that the President has confirmed. There have been disagreements about other matters regarding operations, which I cannot get into”
major news upstairs guys:
dems have budge ready to go with SURPLUS in 2012!
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/P…..62007.html
(ps THIS explains why the rethugs are screaming about changes in the house rules…(linky)
http://rawstory.com/showarticl…..05-16.html
Alfred Kelgarries @ 101
No, I don’t imagine for a minute that the Madrid bomb was an operation of the USA. I can’t even begin to twist my mind around that idea.
Mrs Conyers In The Headlines…
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/….._0516.html
john in sacramento @ 113
Yeah, I remember because I’m in Idaho. It’s was a big time Northwest story.
Helen @ 73
Congress can hire attorneys and conduct a real trial-like investigation, as it did during Watergate and Iran-Contra. If laws are shown to be broken, the regular justice system can take over. Or the issue of a special prosecutor will be forced and one will be appointed.
Loo Hoo. @ 118
That’s not it.
Someone mentioned there was a reference to the Madrid bombings. Remember, the FBI claimed they had info from the Spaniards – who denied it even then – that there was involvement of Americans. It was some guy in Portland, Oregon, an attorney, who had converted to Islam. Nothing! Absolutely nothing was a go in that case.
For background, I would go over to Jeralyn’s place at Talk Left and read. She was following it pretty intensely.
daCascadian @ 114
Yea, I have a problem ;-)
I’ve been accused many times of being a smart ass and not knowing when to shut up about the truth
But what am I going to do – I’m half Irish (the smart ass part) and half German (the truthiness part)
Actually not exactly German
SCHUMER: Right.
And you stated that the next day, Thursday, was the deadline for reauthorization of the program, is that right?
COMEY: Yes, sir.
SCHUMER: OK.
Can you tell us what happened the next day?
COMEY: The program was reauthorized without us and without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting as to its legality. And I prepared a letter of resignation, intending to resign the next day, Friday, March the 12th.
SCHUMER: OK.
And that was the day, as I understand it, of the Madrid train bombings.
COMEY: Thursday, March 11th, was the morning of the Madrid train bombings.
SCHUMER: And so, obviously, people were very concerned with all of that.
COMEY: Yes. It was a very busy day in the counterterrorism aspect.
SCHUMER: Yet, even in light of that, you still felt so strongly that you drafted a letter of resignation.
COMEY: Yes.
SCHUMER: OK.
And why did you decide to resign? COMEY: I just believed…
SCHUMER: Or to offer your resignation, is a better way to put it?
COMEY: I believed that I couldn’t — I couldn’t stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn’t stay.
john in sacramento @ 110
Actually I counted 912 days but I could have made a mistake 2004-leap year. However, these are peculiar events.
Loo Hoo. @ 68
You might be right in this case. After all the “I don’t remember”s and “I don’t recall”s it might be time to take him down.
End Abu Ghraib.
End Gitmo.
End AG Gonzales era.
Even if they don’t succeed in taking him down it will make a tremendous stink and the public might start to pay more attention.
Yeah, go for it!
Frank33 @ 125
I’m too lazy to do the math ;-) so I just used “the google” to verify http://www.snopes.com/rumors/madrid.asp
LS @ 124
Touche’ I am now as confused as you are as to why Schumer brought up the bombings. I’m gonna go back and look also, because it was a year a a half later that Comey left. What changed his mind? I thought it was the bombings. Thanks LS.
9-11-01: Day 0
9-11-02: Day 364 No. Day 365.
Note, Dec 31. day 0, Jan 1 day 1, Dec 31, day 365
I still say 912 days.
Still, I couldn’t believe Specter would even question why Comey would want to resign anyway, regardless of the time frame.
Wordsmith @ 130
I could not believe Spector’s questions. They were quite telling. He said something like, “but they weren’t threatening to fire you, why would you go?” and he kept harping at it. I was blogging in the thread and I “screamed” at Spector that Comey had principles.
Exactly, Helen, exactly.
“principles”? What use has a Republican of “principles”?
Maybe this is OT, but I believe this subject came up on FDL before, within the last month or so:
The story provides specific examples from the Changeable News Network (aka CNN).
This is a bit scary. Fortunately, there are those archive sites? that keep copies of stuff online, in case it gets taken offline? These are independently owned and operated websites, but unfortunately I can’t remember where they’re kept.
Those sites have been handy for gov stuff that gets taken down. For example, the Clinton administration did a lot of stuff on the Digital Divide that the Bushies didn’t like, so about 4 months after Bush was inaugerated in 2000, reports on the digital divide on gov websites started disappearing. Sorry, I don’t have time to chase down references now, but if someone wants’em, I can provide examples.
Those web archives become even more important now, in the face of these attempts to revise history.
Bob in HI
Veritas78 @ 65
“She was Rove’s link with Abramoff.” That just does not sound right! “Rove’s link with Abramoff” Scary image!
Who in their right mind would want to be that link?
#97, 99, and 104
May I suggest two vertical mirrors touching at right angles (like an open book standing up)? The image will be right way around.
Or a concave mirror, such as those used for applying makeup. The mirror acts like a lens and does not laterally reverse what’s reflected.