Click here for the SJC webcast.
My GOD! Arlen Specter is complaining about the timing. He says no one has exceeded the 5 minute rule by this much time. And now he's complaining that the other Republicans aren't here. He's flipping out because he knows the Democrats are about to cream Gonzales and DOJ.
AS: I appreciate what you did. [Tries to say that it's being taken care of] When you finally got to the President, the President told you to do what you thought was right. President backed you up, when it was necessary?
JC Meuller is the one who told me that POTUS said to do what was right. This was fixed in PART because Bush allowed me and Mueller to meet with him alone. And I hesitate that if I say too much the next President wouldn't let us to meet with him in person. [Anyone thinking of the subtext: "Meeting without Dick Cheney"?]
AS You won't say whether President told you to do what DOJ said was right.
JC You're a good examiner, the President and I--I don't think the conversation was finished. I urged him to talk to Mueller about it. President didn't give me that direction at the end of our conversation. Meuller came to me and said President told me to do what was right.
AS I thought you testified that in response to Schumer's question, Bush told you to do what was right.
[No, Specter, Bush wasn't convinced by Comey alone, you fool.]
JC If I did, I misspoke, bc that direction came to me by Mueller.
AS What did Card say to try to convince you?
JC As to deliberative discussions...
AS What did he say that you took as pressure.
JC I don't know that I thought he pressured me or not--he tried to engage me on the substance. I had communicated it on that Tuesday, it didn't change in that conversation with Mr. Card.
AS He didnt' threaten to fire you.
JC No he didn't. He was very civil to me in our face to face meetings.
AS AG Gonzales could be fired in a civil way.
Ha!
10:56
AS Did Gonzales try to pressure you?
AS Did you have other discussions?
JC Yessir: the Vice President, Mr. Addington, disagreed with the conclusion. I don't remember any other WH officials telling me they disagreed.
AS Did VP, ADD threaten you.
JC Nossir.
AS So all these people disagreed with you. Why would you consider resigning? You were acting AG. They could fire you if they wanted. Why consider resigning.
JC Not because of the way I was treated. I didn't think I could stay when they went ahead and did something that I did not believe could be certified. A key fact is that they went ahead and did it without my signature and without the DOJ's approval.
AS Was the program recertified without the approval of Acting AG? So it went forward illegally?
JC Question of interpretation.
AS It was going forward illegally.
JC I'm not presidential scholar. If a determination was found that said it was lawful, then I was bound by it. I believed I couldn't stay if it went ahead without our approval.
AS If the program went forward without your certification, it's illegal, how could you contest that?
JC It's my understanding the DOJ approval was not necessary, but it was customary. It wasn't going forward in violation of any statutory requirement, as far as I knew.
AS Didn't you feel it necessary to find out if there was a statute that required your signature.
JC I'm quite certain that there was no statutory requirement. I didn't know and still don't know the requirement for the DOJ approval.
[Note, Specter at one point said he wasn't going to do what Schumer did, but he's going on 10 minutes now.]
AS It's not illegal. It's not illegal violating custom. What the Administration did was not illegal.
JC I couldn't find a basis for the requirement.
AS So why won't you say it's legal now?
JC Our position was we couldn't find adequate legal basis for the program to go foward as it did.
AS Let me move on, "I only have 35 minutes left." How long did you serve as DAG? During that period, you got along with Card and Addington and all those fellows.
JC I think so.
AS They weren't out to get you because they stood up to them. They weren't out to make your life difficult as DAG.
JC No.
AS There was some speculation that... did you have any sense that you were not permenent DAG as a result of your standing up to Gonzales on this manner.
JC No, I have no reason to believe that I was considered for replacement because of this.
AS Bush overruled Cheney, Addington, Card, and Gonzales. He did the right thing. Mr Comey it's my hope that we'll have a closed session with you to understand this manner. I think you could even tell us what the legalisms were.
[hey, me, too! I'm actually agreeing with Scottish law]
AS Now onto the subject of the hearing.
11:09
AS asks about the fired USAs.
Bogden: career guy who became USA. Very good.
McKay: Very positive sense of John McKay.
Paul Charlton: I don't want to make it sound like I love everybody.Very strong.
David Iglesias: A very good job.
AS: Anyone you thought should be replaced?[they get distracted]
AS What did you make of Sampson's call for resignation of PatFit?
JC Only know about what I read in the newspaper, I was surprised by it.
JC Kyle was very smart, worked hard.
AS What did you think of his smarts after he called for resignation of PatFitz?
AS Can you give us exercise of good judgment by AG?
[JC says nothing.]
JC It's hard, I'm sure there are examples, I'll think of one.
JC He was smart and engaged, I had no reason to question his judgment. I did not have reason to question his judgment of the AG.
AS Are you sufficiently knowledgable of USA purge to give statement about his claim that AGAG was not involved?
JC I am probably more versed than most people. I gather he has corrected that statement.
AS No, I don't think he has corrected that. I've said that if he would tell us why these USAs were fired, it would help. That can all be ... "he can recant what he has said"
CS You went about a minute more than I did.
Pat Leahy: I'm not going to use a great deal of time, so that others here can. [I'm guessing he means Whitehouse--hoping anyway]
PL You wouldn't say legal or illegal, did it comply with FISA law.
JC In open, I can't confirm.
PL We will have a closed door hearing on this. I'm very troubled by what DOJ is doing today, not on your watch. Mr. Comey I have a lot of respect for you, but less and less respect for how the DOJ is being run today. [Now talking about RFK saying there were things his brother couldn't do] I hope the next President will make a solemn vow Never Never Never to do this to DOJ. This AG is doing an abysmal job.
11:19
DiFi
DiFi I'd like to go to hospital conversation. The President used his Article 2 powers, he said, authorization to use military force. He asked that the program be authorized every 45 days. What did you have to sign. What were you confronted with. What piece of paper did you have to sign.
[DiFi has gotten around the secrecy issue, godblessher]
JC It was a signature line on a Presidential order.
DiFi It went ahead without your certification. What was the period time until DOJ said it could go forward.
JC It was the next day that we received the direction from the President. Over the next few weeks, we set about making changes so we thought it was legal.
DiFi For approx 2 weeks?
JC 2-3 weeks.
DiFi And then who signed for DOJ?
JC I may have signed that first one after the hospital.
DiFi You then became satisfied that it complied.
JC We were in a position, given OLC's position, we were in a position to certify its legality.
DiFi it would be very interesting if we can obtain those opinions. I'd be interested in what the legal advice on that program was.
CS We can make the request part of the record.
DiFi was there any other time when this many USAs were fired.
JC Change from Bush 1 to Clinton.
DiFi at the changeover. BUt has there been any other time in history when a large number of USAs were fired without cause. We have the EARs reports. We've been told they're very perfunctory.
JC They're not perfunctory. A big team of people basically live with you for a few weeks. It's very much like an audit by an accounting firm.
DiFi How then could they be fired for performance reasons if at least 6 of the 7 had excellent EARs reports. [so that would include CHiara, who is often forgotten on this issue]
JC I was not aware of performance related issues with these USAs.
DiFi can you ever remember when a USA's loyalty was questioned.
JC I don't remember.
DiFi Everyone we've asked said they did not put the names on the list. Battle, Elston, have denied they put a name on that list. Where would you surmise the list would have come form.
JC I wouldn't know. It came from somewhere.
DiFi You had two meetings with Lam, Project Safe Neighborhoods, You were satisfied with her answers.
JC On Project Safe Neighborhood, she said she got it.
DiFi Were any of the other 10 people you communicated on PSN who were fired?
JC Not to my knowledge.
DiFi IF there are no apparent performance issues, then it was dissatisfaction?
JC I suppose so, if there are no performance issues.
Herb Kohl: Your opinion matters more than others. Would our country be served if we could start fresh tomorrow if we could start fresh tomorrow.
JC I would very much like not to. I would hope you wouldn't care what my opinion is.
HK It's a very important question--your opinion matters much more than most. I'm sure, I presume you have an opinion.
JC I do have an opinion, I'd prefer not to share it.
HK I think it's a clear inference that you believe we would be better without AGAG.
HK You were asked about Steve Biskupic. You said, an absolutely straight guy. When you were asked if you knew he was on a list to be fired. Do you know why he was put on a list of weak performers? Did it have anything to do with the prosecution of vote fraud or Thompson?
JC I don't know from firsthand knowledge he was on a list. I think very highly of him, I think he's what you want in a USA, and I'm not saying that because he's tall and skinny. He's honest and cares deeply about DOJ. His case was reversed, it's not a reflection on the USA or the jury. It doesn't tell you that the prosecutor is a bad guy, and I know this is a good one.
HK Voter fraud the reason behind many of the dismissals. Were you aware that WH thought USAs were not active enough on voter fraud?
JC I'm not aware of any issue regarding voter fraud, complaints or otherwise.
HK Were you aware of pressure to bring voter fraud cases?
JC NOssir.
11:34
Russ Feingold: I want to praise you (CS), some of the most invaluable questioning I've heard from a Senator.
RF I want to thank you for your description of Ashcroft. It has been my experience as well, in spite of our many disagreements. It's important to make these distinctions. You said: The DOJ approval was only an internal control. I think that means we need to pursue this. Are you aware of any papers from WH Counsel office?
JC I don't remember it?
RF OVP? Any documents?
JC No, I don't remember any.
RF Did Card or Gonzales indicate President sent them.
JC I don't recall.
RF Did something occur in March?
JC We had a new AAG, the pace of work in OLC. THere were a number of issues he was looking at.
RF You made a moving address to your colleagues when you left. You stated some of them did pay a price for their commitment. What were you referring to?
JC One particular senior staffer who had been in the hospital, someone who had been blocked for promotion.
RF So you were referring to this.
JC That was Mr Philben.
Specter: We're not going to have a second round: I conclude my thanking your for your service.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Marcy!
ew!
Jane!
Christy!
Dang it , I hate the time difference between the two coasts sometimes.
Thanks MT!
I have to go out, but this shit is unreal. What a hearing!
As a Pennsylvanian, I am always embarrassed that we still have Specter as our senator.
I should have known Specter was going to use this for his own agenda!
Spector: I want your legal judgement. Now you’re explaing that there’s no statute.
Helen says: I cannot believe how bitchy Spector is being.
Spector: Why won’t you say it was legal?
Comey - I already said that if Exec branch said it was egal then it was, but we could not find an adequate legal basis
Because the prez says it is legal it is legal? Holy mackerel!
and there ya have it - Sen WIndbag saying since it wasn’t req’d by statute, it wasn’t illegal
why wont you say it’s illegal ?
not presidential scholar - we simply couldn’t find legal basis (clearly he was somewhat concerned about Unitary Exec hijinks)
spector cried for help b/c he’s clearly uncomfortable carrying the water, especially wtr this wiretapping stuff, imo.
Spect; How long after were you DAG?
Comey: yr and a half
Spec: you got along with them?
Comey? Yep
Spec: they weren’t out to get you?
Comey: Hope not
Spec: never mind hope - did they do something to you cuz of this?
Comey: no
Senator Specter. would you like some more time to make an ass of yourself?
He felt he had to resign — isn’t that enough, Arlen!!
Marcy!
This is brilliant!
Spec: do you know if you were considered to be AG when Ash left?
COmey: Don’t know.
Spec: Pres did right thing. Overruled Gonz, VP, Addington. Buck stopped at Pres.
Spector seems to be saying that if you overruled Cheney and lived, everything must be peachy keen.
shorter spector: no clear path to the executive.
Spector wants a closed hearing.
ooh some more kissing on Specter’s Kiss, Kick, Kiss and I suspect this is Arlen’s anemic attempt to beat back what Whitehouse will bring up
Spec: to fired AGs. You have been reported oncommenting that fired US Attorneys did a good job
So what was the issue they we trying to get Ashcroft to sign?
Bush did the right thing because Comey wouldn’t back down and take the fall…
No profiles in courage for Bush, he is just
a fucking wuss
snowbird42 @ 23
Everyone thinks it was illegal wirtapping, but Comey will not confirm
Spector asking about fired ones. Comey saying they were all very good.
Spect; what about Kyle asking for PatFitz’s resig (said Peter again)
Comey: Surprised.
Spec: Competency of Kyle?
Comey: pleasant worked hard.
Spec: After he asked Pat resig.
Comey: Bad judgement
Spec: Give us an example of good judgement by Abu
COMEY HAS NOTHING
let the record show actual crickets chirping in the chamber!
WOW! He just roasted Gonzales!
I don’t think I made enough popcorn for this…
-S
Hah! AS asked whether Comey had ever seen AG do anything that reflected good judgment.
No examples came to his mind.
Helen @ 25
I think you are right. I remember vaguely this being discussed when it happened.
Is this a hearing, or a love-fest? What is the purpose of Spector’s jocularity.
Strategerie @ 29
but who can go to get more?
EPU’d:
I think The Godfather is a more relevant comparison.
James Comey:George Bush :: John Dean:Richard Nixon
Elliott @ 33
I’m not moving from this seat. Someone get me popcorn!!
BillE @ 7
I’m moving to PA this summer and I’m already embarrassed about him.
how do we square spector’s (apparent) desire to protect president with his increasing desire to get rid of gonzo?
Leahy to Specktor, “God love you”
Repack Rider @ 30
“I don’t recall.”
Arlen, by my clock you DID use 1 more minute. So STFU.
Leahy: Spec asked you about legal or illegal; did it comply with FISA?
Comey: Trying not to confirm what program.
Leahy: OK we need a closed hearing; will have one
there is the answer!
“Did it comply with FISA law”?
Patriot Leahy - did the programs comply with FISA ?
pause . . . “reluctant to answer”
Leahy - we will have closed door session on this
Specter would like Gonzo to resign so they could put an end to this investigation and so as not to open any other related unknown scandals…
Is Arlen still whining about the time thing in the background? Cripes!
I’m just catching up here, but this looks like some good testimony. There’s some stuff here I haven’t heard talked about before. Am I wrong?
Leahy: DOJ is being run as arm of WH. Been here 30 yrs but always thought that profs at DOJ should be allowed to do prof job. There was overriding of prof judgement
Leahy says the DoJ being run like an arm of the Republican party.
Can anyone say “Hatch act?”
there are some grownups around
Have a conference call in 15 min…. dang dang
OMG… Leahy is on fire….. KO had better have this on tonight!
katymine @ 50
KO will def have Comey getting stupmed trying to name a thing that ABU did right.
“Never, NEVER, never!”
Leahy — ask some questions for us!!! in public — we deserve the truth!
good or bad at least always thought career professionals would prevail - but I do think they were overridden - citing RFK as young lawyer -
emphasized over and over again - neither WH or his brother would not be allowed to interfere
someone wake up the WH that “terrible, terrible”
pray next Pres wwill NEVER, NEver, allow politization of DOJ
Man, I hope Christy is having a nice break on travel with hubby–but I hope she’s not missing this!!!
Comey is stopping just short of the wall on so many of his responses. WADR, I hope he is not suffering from something like Stockholm syndrome today. He is between a rock and a hard place……
not trying to be snarky or disrespectful, but has leahy had a stroke? he seems to be slurring a little, and i want to keep him around.
Leahy sounded pissed!
I’d love to hear the closed session.
I guess help has not arrived. Di Fi follows Leahy. No repugs.
Comey was supposed to sign a line on a Presidential Order.
Comey looks like he’s struggling. Wants to answer but does not want to cross line and break the law.
tommy yum @ 57
He always talks that way. Sometimes hard to pick up on everything he says.
Helen @ 20
I’ll bet he effing does! This is hard on the ole Repug!
tommy, believe he is simply just outraged - we may have forgotten what that sounds like
tommy yum @ 57
He often sounds like this. I don’t think there’s anything to worry about unless his anger leads him to a stroke. There’s certainly enough to get that angry about.
Jeepers. I cannot effing believe that the White House and OVP were taking the tack that if the President does it, it’s legal, that he could make anything legal with the flourish of his pen.
With that kind of logic, Clinton’s lying about blow jobs should have been a non-starter.
Ah cat outta bag with DiFi. Surveillance program operated outside DoJ as per order of preznit. Rest was a farce of “authorizations” to make it look legal?
DiFi: Could we obtain legal opinions? Exec order of Pres was prevailing authority, but I want to see what legal advice he got on the program
Spec: we can make it part of the record.
After all these hearings have been completed, will *anyone* be charged with anything? Violating the Hatch Act?, violating FISA law?, RICO indictments?, impeachement proceedings?
I hope that’s the purpose of these hearings - to lay the ground for formal criminal charges to be brought. Otherwise, what’s the point?
Reauthorization on March 11. Is there a way to find out what that program was by back tracking?
DiFi: Firing of USAs? Happened like this before? Summarily firing without cause
Comey: No aware of it before
Rayne @ 66
That’s been their MO from the get go. They never had ANY respect for the rule of law. That’s why Charlie Savage got his Pulitzer, tracking this ugly mess down.
Thanks Marcy and FDL. So much of this stuff is new to me. Would not get it anywhere else.
Rayne @ 66
IOKIYAR
DiFi: if the offices were audited how can they be terminated on Dec 7th if 7 of them had excellent reviews?
Comey: Dunno
Dem-agog @ 69
tracks must be laid before the train can leave the station.
DiFI - everyone is saying they did not put the names on the list. If that is the case where do you think the list would come from.
Comey: Oh no - I haven’t a clue.
Here’s a question: Who came up with the names for all these programs? Someone in DoJ? Or someone from Karl’s shop?
2 meetings w/ Lam
were you satisfied w/ her work in gun program ?
yep.
were any of the other 10 USA’s you spoke w/ re gun program fired ?
no
Kohl: Your opinions matter more than others. Give us your opinion if we start fresh tomorrow who was not in any way as tainted as this one?
Comey: I would really like not to. I am not here to dump on Abu
why does my real time player keep timing out - how can I keep this going?
LOL! Comey: I would very much like NOT to share my opinion about whether the country would be better off with a different AG!
If it were a positive opinion it would be easy to say so. Ergo. . .
Um the fact he doesn’t want to share his opinion perhaps speaks volumes…at least to me.
lew @ 81
have you updated it in the last couple days? if not, you prolly should
Kohl up
your opinion - would our country be well served if new AG tomorrow ?
“I would very much like not to “
“not here to dump on Abu “
Kohl insisting on his opinion -
“have opinion, don’t think it’s my place - “
your reluctance implys you do think we’d be better off without Abu
Kohl: PLEEZZE
Comey: I do have an opinion, I would really like to not share it. Esp since I am now out of gov’t. Please don’t ask. Not my place.
Kohl: I am concludingthat you don’t want to express your opinionis an indication that we would be better served.
Comey: I’d like to not talk about it.
Kohl: you’ve expressed your opinion without expressing it.
Kohl keeps pressing JC for his opinion. Kohl is being an asshole.
re: Kohl - that was a clumsy question and a waste of time.
Move on, sir.
Comey is repeating his testimony from a few weeks ago, which was also full of comity. He strikes me as a balanced, honest guy but his testimony will not further the search for the truth. Asking for his opinion on these matters will go nowhere.
I’m sorry, Biskupic, contrary to what Comey says sounds like a d*ck with the prosecution of Georgia Thompsen.
do you have opinion as to why Wisc USA was added then taken off the list ?
can’t imagine why he would be put on the list, passionate, dedicated guy. he has been beat on b/c of Georgia Thompson case - sometimes shit happens in court - doesn’t mean he’s a bad guy
(cbl thinks his inner boy scout wont allow him to see someone suddenly bend to ROve’s will :))
asking about voter fraud cases — Comey not aware
Totally OT here, but did anyone read the story about McNulty’s resignation?
Did anyone else think the following thing contradictory?
“McNulty said he will leave his post in late summer because of the “financial realities” brought on by “college-age children and two decades of public service.”
and then….
McNulty, 49, said in an interview that the political tumult over the prosecutor dismissals — including his role in providing inaccurate information to Congress — did not play a part in his decision. He said he has not lined up a job but is considering his options.
I mean, if there are financial reasons for you wanting to leave your job but you don’t have one lined up… that seems awfully fishy to me.
[Mod: Please stay on topic during live blogging, thanks]
tommy yum @ 76
Amen.
Russ!
Feingold!!
Russ Feingold up!! Hip Hip Hurray!!
feinstein up
oops feinGOLD
Thank you, emptywheel.
nomolos @ 10
Yes — it’s called a “Presidential Finding” — not sure what happens if actions taken turn out to be illegal…
j.cro @ 94
A little cognitive dissonance?
Abu throws McNulty under the bus.
Russ: The re-auth from AG was only an internal control, not statutory - that means we must pursue. Are you aware of any docs released from WH counsel re: this program
Comey: Don’t remember seeing them
Russ: From Vp?
Comey: No
Russ: did Card/Gonza say they were at hosp due to Pres orders?
Feingold up now -
kissy kissy Ashcroft and his respect for rule of law - unlike current DOJ/WH with some of the most blatant disrespect in US History
are you aware of any documents produced by WH Counsel Office for firings
no
about OVP
dunno
did Gonzo or Card indicate they were acting with knowledge of Prez
not that I recall
Ditto. What Dem-agog says at#69.
What good are the hearings and bringing to light the violations and hijacking of the DOJ for Bush/Rovian purposes if congress allows Gonzales to remain AG?
Congress, please. Do a quick and efficient precision strike. Remove Gonzales.
So many reasons exist; the very least for lack of confidence.
It is much darker than incompetence.
Fein: you farewell address. You sadi some people paid price for their committment
Comey: I had in mind one particular sr staffer of mind who had been inhosp and had been blocked from promotion cuz of hosp incident
the preznit couldn’t “find” his ass with… Well, you know the rest.
Re Biskupic and the Thompson case, sure a USA can occasionally be reversed but this was a prosecution in the middle of a gubernatorial campaign and used in Republican ads against Democrats. Also the reversal wasn’t just a reversal. It was a slam, “the USA is out of control and doesn’t know or care about the law” reversal.
Brisingamen @ 102
POTUS, however, cannot make law; if Presidential Finding constitutes undoing existing precedent and law and establishes a new practice, it is lawmaking and that is reserved to Congress.
Russ re Comey’s farewell address. Maybe the good senator visits the lake? ;)
Feingold scores
Helen @ 107
He named te staffer, I missed it.
Russ asking about Comey’s farewell address where he was urging the staff to follow the rule of law. What a novel concept with the crooks in the WH!
Snarlin is leaving the hearing. Good.
Helen @ 113
Philbin
shorter specter: i need to leave now and scream into a pillow. i mean vote.
sheldon!
Spector gone: Buh BYE
Whitehouse up!!
tommy yum @ 116
hehehe! Good one!
Without disclosing the details of those requirements, orders or rulings, are you aware of any FISA Court rulings, requirements or orders relating to the TSA?
Are you aware of any instances where those rulings, requirement or orders were violated?
Are you aware of any instances where anyone advocated for continued or continuing violations of those rulings, requirments or orders?
Whitehouse: Talking about talking points: “influence a particular prosecution” Says they’re all saying the exact same thing. This looks like Obstruction of Justice.
Helen says: I think I’m in love
Helen @ 121
easy there ole girl! In through the nose, out through the mouth, repeat until your temp comes down!
Whitehouse: Could this be Ob of Jus?
Comey: Could be.
W: Is that the right bar to set - not breaking the law?
Comey: No, too low
Go Whitehouse!
comey give fitz a shout-out! “they’ve got to call…balls and strikes!”
…add “violations of the Obstruction of Justice statute” to my listat #69….(h/t to Whitehouse). That’s the real meaning behind AttorneyPurgeGate.