<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq to Bar Media Coverage of Bombings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:25:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: myrtle june</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-692275</link>
		<dc:creator>myrtle june</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 04:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-692275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sort of as a companion piece is the Pentegon pulling the plug on soldiers’ access to YouTube and MySpace. They’ve blocked it. They’ll be no more first hand accounts of anything from them either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And yes, Al Qaeda is the big buzzword attached to everything because they need poll numbers. They NEED to beat the “terrr terrr fear fear” drum with a renewed fervor. It wins elections. They can’t very well do that with all this truth and facts shit all over the place to be had by just anyone yanno! We’ll keep seeing more of the rovarian “news” plants in the NYT and WaPo as well. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next, they’ll be calling off the election because we’re at war doncha know . They’re “staying the course”… make no mistake on that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of as a companion piece is the Pentegon pulling the plug on soldiers’ access to YouTube and MySpace. They’ve blocked it. They’ll be no more first hand accounts of anything from them either.</p>
<p>And yes, Al Qaeda is the big buzzword attached to everything because they need poll numbers. They NEED to beat the “terrr terrr fear fear” drum with a renewed fervor. It wins elections. They can’t very well do that with all this truth and facts shit all over the place to be had by just anyone yanno! We’ll keep seeing more of the rovarian “news” plants in the NYT and WaPo as well. </p>
<p>Next, they’ll be calling off the election because we’re at war doncha know . They’re “staying the course”… make no mistake on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691971</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691971</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Need For Al Qaeda To Be In Iraq&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could my thinking be so far off? When no one else has made the same point, or at least in the direction of my point, as me, I wonder if I could be that far of the logic concerning this kidnapping.With the kidnappings, this administration is taking the opportunity to boast the contention Al Qaeda is in Iraq, so they need to stay there to fight the war on terror. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the last 4 months, there has been a huge debate on whether to put &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnjonline.com/opinion/iraq_21503___article.html/iraqi_government.html&quot;&gt;timetables in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;. One of the arguments has been: If we leave now we would be strengthening A&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/node/12321&quot;&gt;l Qaeda and Iran&lt;/a&gt;. What more evidence is needed to make the case for occupation in Iraq when you got 5 dead US solders and 3 missing? To add in this logic, a Al Qaeda affiliate has made claims to the attacks. There is another reason why this administration needs Al Qaeda to be in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know most people have heard the many complaints we have abandon our efforts to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anorak.co.uk/news/back-pages/173296.html&quot;&gt;hunt down Bin Laden and Al Qaeda&lt;/a&gt;. Couldn’t you make the case you were doing what Americans want you to do if you were hunting down Bin Laden’s group in Iraq, especially after you just lost solders and cannot account for all of those involved in the attack?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because I don’t believe anything this administration and his general cronies, not all are cronies, put out, I am always looking for the next lie around the corner. I have had it with the delvers of Bush’s propaganda: Fox news and their wantabees CNN, MSNBC, Washington Journal,and the rest all have a conservative slant in their news reporting. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far, the connection to Al Qaeda being responsible for this attack is weak, From what I know about Al Qaeda, they usually take direct responsibility for their attacks very quickly after the attack. Think about 911. It did not take long for the murders, Bin Laden and the real Al Qaeda, to take credit for their crime. Why would they take this indirect approach now?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I were doing the propaganda thing to seek support for this war, the last thing I would want is the media “turning over the same rocks” I did. They would get the true discovery. Yes, it better to bar them from the make up site, and feed them the information you want them to have.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joseph&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Need For Al Qaeda To Be In Iraq</b></p>
<p>Could my thinking be so far off? When no one else has made the same point, or at least in the direction of my point, as me, I wonder if I could be that far of the logic concerning this kidnapping.With the kidnappings, this administration is taking the opportunity to boast the contention Al Qaeda is in Iraq, so they need to stay there to fight the war on terror. </p>
<p>For the last 4 months, there has been a huge debate on whether to put <a href="http://www.cnjonline.com/opinion/iraq_21503___article.html/iraqi_government.html">timetables in Iraq</a>. One of the arguments has been: If we leave now we would be strengthening A<a href="http://newsbusters.org/node/12321">l Qaeda and Iran</a>. What more evidence is needed to make the case for occupation in Iraq when you got 5 dead US solders and 3 missing? To add in this logic, a Al Qaeda affiliate has made claims to the attacks. There is another reason why this administration needs Al Qaeda to be in Iraq.</p>
<p>I know most people have heard the many complaints we have abandon our efforts to <a href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/news/back-pages/173296.html">hunt down Bin Laden and Al Qaeda</a>. Couldn’t you make the case you were doing what Americans want you to do if you were hunting down Bin Laden’s group in Iraq, especially after you just lost solders and cannot account for all of those involved in the attack?</p>
<p>Because I don’t believe anything this administration and his general cronies, not all are cronies, put out, I am always looking for the next lie around the corner. I have had it with the delvers of Bush’s propaganda: Fox news and their wantabees CNN, MSNBC, Washington Journal,and the rest all have a conservative slant in their news reporting. </p>
<p>So far, the connection to Al Qaeda being responsible for this attack is weak, From what I know about Al Qaeda, they usually take direct responsibility for their attacks very quickly after the attack. Think about 911. It did not take long for the murders, Bin Laden and the real Al Qaeda, to take credit for their crime. Why would they take this indirect approach now?</p>
<p>If I were doing the propaganda thing to seek support for this war, the last thing I would want is the media “turning over the same rocks” I did. They would get the true discovery. Yes, it better to bar them from the make up site, and feed them the information you want them to have.</p>
<p>Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691969</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691969</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; Alfred Kelgarries @ 83&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;how about this scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a concentrated uprising in baghdad and elsewhere cuts off us troops; supplies are unable to get from kuwait or kurdistand or saudi arabia. attempts to bring in supplies by air are partially successful until a chemical or dirty bomb attack leaves the airport useless. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the us attacks from carrier based planes to no avail. house to house fighting in BD leads to thousands of US dead, many more captured and killed after torture (helpfully submitted to the internet afterwards). Finally in desperation the US begs Iran for help; Iran sends in its Republican Guards and “escorts” the us troops out to Iran, forcing them to leave their heavy armor and weapons behind. they are then “debriefed” for about a month and sent home a few planeloads at a time for maximum media punch. the shia government of iraq then, with help of the RG, slaughters all reachable sunni, while turkey invades in the north and effectively decimates the kurds, turning the oil over to the Iraqi govt in return for promises to keep the kurds under control. the saudis can do nothing, they can’t take on iran and iraq (with us weapons) both. Kuwait and SA expell all us forces to avoid similar bloodbaths in the region.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prove me wrong, folks. THIS is the disaster I see coming. Chimpy wants it to happen on the next Dem Prez’s watch but he may not be that lucky…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phreakin spookily eerie and all things easily possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tanbark woulda said this, so I’m gonna email him direct and use yer words if ya don’t mind to shove it down his gullet cuz he’s so damned always right . . :grin:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I buy into all you say, hoss, only, I’m not sure it works out as neatly as you posit. My version has a lot more slaughter in it, in paybacks for Islamic Desocratins. Heads will roll. As the Old Caliph would have done. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m not sure, they ain’t entitled to do so, either. I’m NOT about religons being one up on anyone. But I’m about politics and peoples holding their ground and being rightous. I haven’t seen a lot of rightous in humans for a few thousand years now . . . . anyone else? Bueller?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Alfred Kelgarries @ 83</p>
<p>how about this scenario:</p>
<p>a concentrated uprising in baghdad and elsewhere cuts off us troops; supplies are unable to get from kuwait or kurdistand or saudi arabia. attempts to bring in supplies by air are partially successful until a chemical or dirty bomb attack leaves the airport useless. </p>
<p>the us attacks from carrier based planes to no avail. house to house fighting in BD leads to thousands of US dead, many more captured and killed after torture (helpfully submitted to the internet afterwards). Finally in desperation the US begs Iran for help; Iran sends in its Republican Guards and “escorts” the us troops out to Iran, forcing them to leave their heavy armor and weapons behind. they are then “debriefed” for about a month and sent home a few planeloads at a time for maximum media punch. the shia government of iraq then, with help of the RG, slaughters all reachable sunni, while turkey invades in the north and effectively decimates the kurds, turning the oil over to the Iraqi govt in return for promises to keep the kurds under control. the saudis can do nothing, they can’t take on iran and iraq (with us weapons) both. Kuwait and SA expell all us forces to avoid similar bloodbaths in the region.</p>
<p>Prove me wrong, folks. THIS is the disaster I see coming. Chimpy wants it to happen on the next Dem Prez’s watch but he may not be that lucky…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Phreakin spookily eerie and all things easily possible.</p>
<p>Tanbark woulda said this, so I’m gonna email him direct and use yer words if ya don’t mind to shove it down his gullet cuz he’s so damned always right . . :grin:</p>
<p>I buy into all you say, hoss, only, I’m not sure it works out as neatly as you posit. My version has a lot more slaughter in it, in paybacks for Islamic Desocratins. Heads will roll. As the Old Caliph would have done. </p>
<p>I’m not sure, they ain’t entitled to do so, either. I’m NOT about religons being one up on anyone. But I’m about politics and peoples holding their ground and being rightous. I haven’t seen a lot of rightous in humans for a few thousand years now . . . . anyone else? Bueller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691960</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691960</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-691669&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alfred Kelgarries @ 95&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; . . . . .we could have won vietnam in two months wihout using nukes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How? I’ve heard MUCH macho talk about this WINNING shit, but, no one ever says HOW. Other than more firepower, more killing, yadda yadda.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SE Asia is a special spot for me, as my pops was in it in the 50’s and early 60’s from a ‘Befriend The Peasants’ perspective. He and his programs got shit on when the butter went to guns.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tell me how.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-691669"><em>Alfred Kelgarries @ 95</em></a> . . . . .we could have won vietnam in two months wihout using nukes. </p>
<p>How? I’ve heard MUCH macho talk about this WINNING shit, but, no one ever says HOW. Other than more firepower, more killing, yadda yadda.</p>
<p>SE Asia is a special spot for me, as my pops was in it in the 50’s and early 60’s from a ‘Befriend The Peasants’ perspective. He and his programs got shit on when the butter went to guns.</p>
<p>Tell me how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691948</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691948</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-691651&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Elliott @ 79&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; . . . . I feel like they’ve turned and are now making a move against us, the American peep!e&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That move began LONG ago, google Leo Strauss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, Neocons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then, Contract With America. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And reread Eisenhower’s farewell speech about the MIC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far, the american people, and the blogs, and the MSM, and everyone for the most part, have rolled over and played possum to either PARTS of the scene, or all of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Money talks, Big Bro Walks It All. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who or how will change this?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-691651"><em>Elliott @ 79</em></a> . . . . I feel like they’ve turned and are now making a move against us, the American peep!e</p>
<p>That move began LONG ago, google Leo Strauss.</p>
<p>Then, Neocons.</p>
<p>Then, Contract With America. </p>
<p>And reread Eisenhower’s farewell speech about the MIC.</p>
<p>So far, the american people, and the blogs, and the MSM, and everyone for the most part, have rolled over and played possum to either PARTS of the scene, or all of it.</p>
<p>Money talks, Big Bro Walks It All. </p>
<p>Who or how will change this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691890</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691890</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-691634&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;solai @ 64&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is McNulty scheduled to testify?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have an impression he’s been called to do so? Where’d my feeble pea brain get THAT idea? I dont’ keep track of a lot of stuff so well . . . . some things just stick hard. Oh well, GO FDL PUPS!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-691634"><em>solai @ 64</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Is McNulty scheduled to testify?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I have an impression he’s been called to do so? Where’d my feeble pea brain get THAT idea? I dont’ keep track of a lot of stuff so well . . . . some things just stick hard. Oh well, GO FDL PUPS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691886</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-691632&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Siun @ 62&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;GSD - all my sources say yep, Tet plus developing. Tribes north and south uniting (note, this transcends sunni and shia)- think supply lines and exit routes, increase of attacks on Green Zone, reactions to the walling in of neighborhoods followed by US air bombardments on those neighborhoods, and more …&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I thought I had already read on AW.com by someone in past 7 days that there WAS a unity movement to demand US Withdrawl. Unlike Tricky Dick, it IS time to pull out in the middle of a screw. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still . . . . it’s all the same game from both aisles. What will be done about that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-691632"><em>Siun @ 62</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>GSD &#8211; all my sources say yep, Tet plus developing. Tribes north and south uniting (note, this transcends sunni and shia)- think supply lines and exit routes, increase of attacks on Green Zone, reactions to the walling in of neighborhoods followed by US air bombardments on those neighborhoods, and more …</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And I thought I had already read on AW.com by someone in past 7 days that there WAS a unity movement to demand US Withdrawl. Unlike Tricky Dick, it IS time to pull out in the middle of a screw. </p>
<p>Still . . . . it’s all the same game from both aisles. What will be done about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredfed</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691883</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredfed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691883</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-691674&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bustednuckles @ 100&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;For those of you old enough to remember the media coverage of the Vietnam War, you’ll remember how vividly it was brought to us every evening on our television screens by the nightly news programs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I remember, I watched it every night. I grew up watching it.&lt;br /&gt;
I remember the last chopper out and our boys pushing them over the side of aircraft carriers.&lt;br /&gt;
I remember even though I was young.&lt;br /&gt;
Nixon in 73 ended it, finally, way too damn late for way too damn many.&lt;br /&gt;
It seems our current government has absolutely no recollection.&lt;br /&gt;
I remember.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I remember, too, busted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-691674"><em>Bustednuckles @ 100</em></a></p>
<blockquote><blockquote>For those of you old enough to remember the media coverage of the Vietnam War, you’ll remember how vividly it was brought to us every evening on our television screens by the nightly news programs.</p></blockquote>
<p>I remember, I watched it every night. I grew up watching it.<br />
I remember the last chopper out and our boys pushing them over the side of aircraft carriers.<br />
I remember even though I was young.<br />
Nixon in 73 ended it, finally, way too damn late for way too damn many.<br />
It seems our current government has absolutely no recollection.<br />
I remember.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I remember, too, busted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691866</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, you’ll see it on Al Jeezera, you just won’t see it on any USA sources, or the internet other n Al Jeezera. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s almost UNBELIEVABLE they’d even SAY they were gonna block journalists from combat zones, and it’s unfathomable how they will actually enforce it. I DO expect, there will a HUGE increase in dead periodista’s in the next few weeks, though . . . . . including some bodies that were not even literate, much less able to report. Just shot, hacked up, and called a journalist. Examples, as it were. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wierd scenes inside the gold mine, wierder and wierder every day, and heading to more and more hidden and nasty blacker and blacker ops daily. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How much will the public stand for this?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you’ll see it on Al Jeezera, you just won’t see it on any USA sources, or the internet other n Al Jeezera. </p>
<p>It’s almost UNBELIEVABLE they’d even SAY they were gonna block journalists from combat zones, and it’s unfathomable how they will actually enforce it. I DO expect, there will a HUGE increase in dead periodista’s in the next few weeks, though . . . . . including some bodies that were not even literate, much less able to report. Just shot, hacked up, and called a journalist. Examples, as it were. </p>
<p>Wierd scenes inside the gold mine, wierder and wierder every day, and heading to more and more hidden and nasty blacker and blacker ops daily. </p>
<p>How much will the public stand for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Dido</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691858</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/14/iraq-to-bar-media-coverage-of-bombings/#comment-691858</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Late to the party: thanks so much, Jeralyn, for this post.  It absolutely KILLS me how we can’t find out what’s going on in Iraq.  At the very least, as a taxpayer I should be able to know what my taxes are purchasing—after all, this is actually a public war (&amp; according to our president, a global, multi-national war), not a secret operation.  Siun’s weekly posts about what’s happening in Iraq actually help to save my sanity.  I weep over them, but I think they are crucial.  I still don’t understand why the MSM has just bent over for the administration’s ban on photographs of caskets coming home from the war.  How can we honor our fallen soldiers if we don’t know they’re falling?  I know that our men and women who are fighting over there are bothered because most Americans seem oblivious to the war.  I would like any of them who happens to read this (pretty unlikely, as this comment is so late) to know: many, many of us want to know more about what’s happening to you.  The government and the main-stream media won’t let us know.  I hope you will all start to speak out publicly when you finally get home—there are many of us who really want to hear from you.  We don’t care if you favor the war or oppose it—we want to hear from you.  (And those who don’t want to hear from you should be forced to listen!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the party: thanks so much, Jeralyn, for this post.  It absolutely KILLS me how we can’t find out what’s going on in Iraq.  At the very least, as a taxpayer I should be able to know what my taxes are purchasing—after all, this is actually a public war (&amp; according to our president, a global, multi-national war), not a secret operation.  Siun’s weekly posts about what’s happening in Iraq actually help to save my sanity.  I weep over them, but I think they are crucial.  I still don’t understand why the MSM has just bent over for the administration’s ban on photographs of caskets coming home from the war.  How can we honor our fallen soldiers if we don’t know they’re falling?  I know that our men and women who are fighting over there are bothered because most Americans seem oblivious to the war.  I would like any of them who happens to read this (pretty unlikely, as this comment is so late) to know: many, many of us want to know more about what’s happening to you.  The government and the main-stream media won’t let us know.  I hope you will all start to speak out publicly when you finally get home—there are many of us who really want to hear from you.  We don’t care if you favor the war or oppose it—we want to hear from you.  (And those who don’t want to hear from you should be forced to listen!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
