Comments on: No Love for Lieberman in CT http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/ Firedoglake weblog Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:34:49 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: noel http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-680529 noel Wed, 09 May 2007 19:52:30 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-680529 <p>2008 is critical. the democrats should gain more seats then kick this traitor out. THANK YOU VERY MUCH CONNECTICUT!</p> 2008 is critical. the democrats should gain more seats then kick this traitor out. THANK YOU VERY MUCH CONNECTICUT!

]]> By: Wes http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-680161 Wes Wed, 09 May 2007 16:09:37 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-680161 <p>The voters of Connecticut got exactly what they deserve, and Israel got the best senator money could buy.</p> The voters of Connecticut got exactly what they deserve, and Israel got the best senator money could buy.

]]> By: Woodhall Hollow http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679891 Woodhall Hollow Wed, 09 May 2007 12:32:13 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679891 <p>I know I am a day late to this thread, but I am surprised that no one has mentioned the unmentionable elephant wrt Lieberman. </p> <p>I.S.R.E.A.L. </p> <p>Lieberman is a Sharon/Olmert guy. He does not represent the state of Connecticut but rather the state of Israel. And the reason he is not a Dem anymore is because he is first and foremost a member of the Likud party. When you take this into account, ALL of his actions and statements vis a vis the War in Iraq makes sense. When he says that he wants to fight Al Qaeda in Iraq so that we don’t have to fight them at home, you have to realize that by home he means Israel. And Saddam did fund Palestinian Suicide bombers in the form of payments to their families. The Likud party in Israel has wanted the US to take Saddam out for a very long time. And now they want us to go after Iran for them.</p> I know I am a day late to this thread, but I am surprised that no one has mentioned the unmentionable elephant wrt Lieberman.

I.S.R.E.A.L.

Lieberman is a Sharon/Olmert guy. He does not represent the state of Connecticut but rather the state of Israel. And the reason he is not a Dem anymore is because he is first and foremost a member of the Likud party. When you take this into account, ALL of his actions and statements vis a vis the War in Iraq makes sense. When he says that he wants to fight Al Qaeda in Iraq so that we don’t have to fight them at home, you have to realize that by home he means Israel. And Saddam did fund Palestinian Suicide bombers in the form of payments to their families. The Likud party in Israel has wanted the US to take Saddam out for a very long time. And now they want us to go after Iran for them.

]]> By: deandra http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679854 deandra Wed, 09 May 2007 11:22:23 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679854 <p><a href="#comment-678818"><em>Oklahoma kiddo @ 18</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>On Lieberman my position has been clear. I want the Democratic Party to get rid of this man. And I am fully aware of what this might mean. Lieberman is a cheap blackmailer. I want him out. I want my Democratic Party to stop allowing him to causus. I want this individual driven from the party.</p></blockquote> <p>Take it up with Harry Reid who assured and guaranteed Lieberman all privileges to this non-democrat!</p> Oklahoma kiddo @ 18

On Lieberman my position has been clear. I want the Democratic Party to get rid of this man. And I am fully aware of what this might mean. Lieberman is a cheap blackmailer. I want him out. I want my Democratic Party to stop allowing him to causus. I want this individual driven from the party.

Take it up with Harry Reid who assured and guaranteed Lieberman all privileges to this non-democrat!

]]> By: Liberty Lover http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679776 Liberty Lover Wed, 09 May 2007 05:44:17 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679776 <p>Uh, it’s not called gotcha… it is called oversight…</p> Uh, it’s not called gotcha… it is called oversight…

]]> By: masaccio http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679401 masaccio Wed, 09 May 2007 02:41:41 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679401 <p>Re the Madsen report;</p> <p>He likes to put on a diaper while the woman pours orange juice on him.</p> <p>And a pony, please.</p> Re the Madsen report;

He likes to put on a diaper while the woman pours orange juice on him.

And a pony, please.

]]> By: *ilbo http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679212 *ilbo Wed, 09 May 2007 01:04:50 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679212 <p><a href="#comment-679186"><em>*ilbo @ 179</em></a></p> <blockquote><blockquote>ET said<br /> <blockquote>Wayne Madsen is reporting that Deadeye is on Palfrey’s list. Bigtime:</blockquote> <p>></p> <p>I read this somewhere today but can’t find it now.</p></blockquote> <p>Vilains and Vilians thread post #150, chuckle, chuckle!</p></blockquote> <p><a href="#comment-679186"><em>*ilbo @ 179</em></a></p> <blockquote><blockquote>ET said<br /> <blockquote>Wayne Madsen is reporting that Deadeye is on Palfrey’s list. Bigtime:</blockquote> <p>><br /> Practice, practice, cut & paste. Phew!</p> <p>!*ilbo says:<br /> May 8th, 2007 at 12:32 pm<br /> OT-The ’shooter’ has been out of the news for a bit and just pooped up at the waynemadsen.com site. Of course it’s only Wayne but this has got to be the best laugh of the day. Thus far!</p></blockquote></blockquote> *ilbo @ 179

ET said

Wayne Madsen is reporting that Deadeye is on Palfrey’s list. Bigtime:

>

I read this somewhere today but can’t find it now.

Vilains and Vilians thread post #150, chuckle, chuckle!

*ilbo @ 179

ET said

Wayne Madsen is reporting that Deadeye is on Palfrey’s list. Bigtime:

>
Practice, practice, cut & paste. Phew!

!*ilbo says:
May 8th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
OT-The ’shooter’ has been out of the news for a bit and just pooped up at the waynemadsen.com site. Of course it’s only Wayne but this has got to be the best laugh of the day. Thus far!

]]> By: MarkH http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679210 MarkH Wed, 09 May 2007 01:03:15 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679210 <p><a href="#comment-678871"><em>Oklahoma kiddo @ 65</em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Lieberman is my party’s responsibility. Now deal with him Democrats! Get rid of him.</p></blockquote> <p>If it were just one Senate seat I’d agree whole-heartedly.</p> <p>However, I’ve been watching the Bushies and in my opinion they’ve been planning and hoping to get rid of Cheney to put JEB in as Veep. That’s too scary to allow.</p> <p>Even this recent attack on Cheney is probably coming more from the Bushies than from independent sources.</p> <p>What I’d want to know before we go down this road is who has Lieberman’s vote locked up.</p> <p>My preference would be to NOT trust Lieberman or our guess-work and instead create a perfect storm of political disgust for Republicans, related to their involvement with (ownership of) the Iraq war. Then, Lieberman wouldn’t really have much choice but to stay with the Dems and let us get rid of Cheney.</p> <p>If we could pull off all that, then we could more-or-less control which Jerry Ford to ‘promote’ out of Congress (and out of government Jan. 2009).</p> Oklahoma kiddo @ 65

Lieberman is my party’s responsibility. Now deal with him Democrats! Get rid of him.

If it were just one Senate seat I’d agree whole-heartedly.

However, I’ve been watching the Bushies and in my opinion they’ve been planning and hoping to get rid of Cheney to put JEB in as Veep. That’s too scary to allow.

Even this recent attack on Cheney is probably coming more from the Bushies than from independent sources.

What I’d want to know before we go down this road is who has Lieberman’s vote locked up.

My preference would be to NOT trust Lieberman or our guess-work and instead create a perfect storm of political disgust for Republicans, related to their involvement with (ownership of) the Iraq war. Then, Lieberman wouldn’t really have much choice but to stay with the Dems and let us get rid of Cheney.

If we could pull off all that, then we could more-or-less control which Jerry Ford to ‘promote’ out of Congress (and out of government Jan. 2009).

]]> By: David Ehrenstein http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679202 David Ehrenstein Wed, 09 May 2007 00:57:06 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679202 <p><b>DUMP THE CREEP!</b></p> DUMP THE CREEP!

]]> By: *ilbo http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679186 *ilbo Wed, 09 May 2007 00:49:52 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/08/no-love-for-lieberman-in-ct/#comment-679186 <blockquote><p>ET said<br /> </p><blockquote>Wayne Madsen is reporting that Deadeye is on Palfrey’s list. Bigtime:</blockquote></blockquote> <p>></p> <p>I read this somewhere today but can’t find it now.</p> <p>Vilains and Vilians thread post #150, chuckle, chuckle!</p>

ET said

Wayne Madsen is reporting that Deadeye is on Palfrey’s list. Bigtime:

>

I read this somewhere today but can’t find it now.

Vilains and Vilians thread post #150, chuckle, chuckle!

]]>