tell me why

It never ends, does it? 

On Friday, "Dean" David Broder faced The Readers in a WaPo chat that is sure to go down in infamy.  They pulverized the poor man. 

Chaska, Minn.: As a political pundit how do you calibrate your perceptions on mainstream America? The reason I ask this is based on your recent columns. My guess is your views (as a lot of the Beltway punditry) is very skewed…Do we really need to be held hostage to the selfish interest of a minority in this country? Because that is where we are now.

That was the first one out of the box.  It only got uglier from there.

Baltimore: What would you say to try to regain the confidence of someone like me who has become increasingly skeptical of opinion makers like you because you have been so wrong so many times about the Bush administration and Iraq?

Colorado: "I think the country is closely balanced, with a controlling group in the center that rejects extreme positions and seeks practical solutions drawn from the agendas of both liberals and conservatives."

That may well be, but given that you consider the neocon Joe Lieberman to be a centrist, and your column(s) about how John McCain and Lindsey Graham were going to save habeas corpus and block torture, maybe your antenna isn't as keen as it once was.

Heh.  That was my favorite.

The one that Think Progress and others found most worthy of note, however, was this gem:

Arden, N.C.: Mr. Broder, you stated that you would revisit your Bush bounce column. We haven't seen it yet. Is it coming any time soon?

Ah, oui, messieurs et dames!!  Zee fabled Boosh Bounce, eh?  Meestair Brodair, you were sayeeng not zo vairy long ah-go, hein?

Bush Regains His Footing

Friday, February 16, 2007; Page A23

It may seem perverse to suggest that, at the very moment the House of Representatives is repudiating his policy in Iraq, President Bush is poised for a political comeback. But don't be astonished if that is the case.

Like President Bill Clinton after the Democrats lost control of Congress in 1994, Bush has gone through a period of wrenching adjustment to his reduced status. But just as Clinton did in the winter of 1995, Bush now shows signs of renewed energy and is regaining the initiative on several fronts.

More important, he is demonstrating political smarts that even his critics have to acknowledge.

Ahhhhh, Sadly, NOOOOO!!

But According to the new NEWSWEEK Poll, the public’s approval of Bush has sunk to 28 percent, an all-time low for this president in our poll, and a point lower than Gallup recorded for his father at Bush Sr.’s nadir. The last president to be this unpopular was Jimmy Carter who also scored a 28 percent approval in 1979.

But The Dean promised us on Friday that today's column would be a reappraisal of the Bush Bounce, and it would be a shame for us to not even stop by and see that the old dear hasn't hurt himself.  Sigh.  Here's a clothes-pin for your nose.  All set?  Let's go!

A War The Public Will End

Sunday, May 6, 2007; Page B07

The gap between public opinion and Washington reality has rarely been wider than on the issue of the Iraq war.

Oh, gosh, never mind.  Let's go home.  I didn't mean it.  We'll just spend the day reading Sadly, No! and eating ice cream.  Come on, let's go.  No, now, please.  Okay, no?  Then I'll just wait in the car and…

Okay. 

You see, he has even managed to irritate me in the first sentence.  Notice that we, the public, are relegated (like those zany blogger people) to the realm of "opinion", while the sober, wise adults in Washington wrestle with "reality".  Already, we're off on a bad footing here.  It's like a reflex.  I don't even think he knows that he's doing it.

How about we turn that around to read, "Washington opinion and public reality"?  But go on…

A clear national mandate is being blocked — for now — by constraints that make sense only in the short-term calculus of politics in this capital city.

Since when is one arrogant little Napoleon in the Oval Office "constraints that make sense only in the blah de blah blah"? 

The public verdict on the war is plain. Large majorities have come to believe that it was a mistake to go in, and equally large majorities want to begin the process of getting out. That is what the polls say; it is what the mail to Capitol Hill says; and it is what voters signaled when they put the Democrats back into control of Congress in November.

I really should stop here.  I know I should.  I should go home and…okay, Grampa Dave.  Go on.  You were saying?  What can we do about the war?

Part of the answer lies in the Constitution. It makes the president commander in chief of the armed forces, the only elected official whose orders every general and every private must obey.

Congress shares war-making power under the Constitution but can exercise it only through its control of the money the president needs to finance any military operation.

In this moment, the commander in chief has a clear plan — to apply more military force in and around Baghdad in hopes of suppressing the sectarian violence and creating space for the Iraqi politicians to assemble a functioning government.

It is a high-risk policy with no guarantee of success. But it is a clear strategy.

You know what's coming next, right?  THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NO PLAN!

The Democratic-controlled Congress, on the other hand, lacks agreement on any such plan.

Okay.  Now.  Let's get something straight here.  Mr. Broder, let's pretend that you and I and President Bush have all come down the stairs into your basement and found that it's knee deep in kerosene.

"Gosh, Mr. Broder," I say, "This looks pretty bad.  We need to figure out how we're going to get this stuff out of here.  Maybe we should call the fire department or a waste disposal team." 

President Bush pulls a box of 'Strike Anywhere' matches out of his suit pocket and says, "I got a idear!  This'll take care of it REAL quick!"

And I say, "No!  Cut that out!  What are you, insane?"

You, Mr. Broder, are saying, "Well, at least the President HAS a plan!"

Yes, but that doesn't make it the right plan.  Or even a particularly good plan.  In fact, it's just about the worst plan he could have come up with under the circumstances. 

But, back to you, Your Deanliness:

Come September, when Gen. David Petraeus, the commander in Iraq, says that he will be able to judge whether the new tactics and the nearly 30,000 additional troops have turned the tide in the effort to reduce the carnage in Baghdad, different political forces will prevail.If he is successful and if the Iraqis begin to make the political accommodations needed to form a stable government…

And if bats and monkeys fly out of my ass and give me a ride to the moon…

…the president will be in a far better position to rally domestic support for the cause. 

Oh, so that's when we'll see this famous bounce?  In just one more Friedman Unit?  Because this is the only attempt I see in your column to address the public's overwhelming rejection of your president and his Great and Glorious War and how badly you got it wrong last February.  You treat "public opinion" in this essay as if it's some massive mute, dumb, unthinking force of nature like a glacier or an algal bloom, a distant force, an unfortunate reality that must eventually be dealt with, but not today, not with any urgency. 

It's not like anyone's life depends on it or anything.

Related posts:

  1. DC Teabagging crowd estimate pegged at 8675309 because it “has a good beat and you can dance to it”
  2. Baucus to Lead on Health Care
  3. MATLOCK!!!
  4. Sunday Late Night: I want my MDTV!
  5. VIDEO Raul Grijalva Takes the Pledge: 1 Down, 39 To Go