<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schooled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:31:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Pordon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-664769</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Pordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-664769</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662852&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TiredFed @&lt;br /&gt;
                52              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;To date, I have not seen anything in writing that delegates the President’s authority to remove U.S. Attorneys (this ain’t it).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has probably been brought up, but I haven’t seen it: did Bush even know about the forced resignations until they hit the news? And why do I constantly feel like there’s no one in the cockpit here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EDIT: or for a better analogy, it’s like riding “the bus” the Bushie trolls always crow about driving, glancing across the aisle, and seeing Georgie sitting in the back with his nose buried in a Little Golden Book and swinging his feet. Someone might be driving the bus (poorly and recklessly, mowing down pedestrians), but it isn’t the kid with the lollipop and snot-stained sleeves.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-662852"><em>TiredFed @<br />
                52              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>To date, I have not seen anything in writing that delegates the President’s authority to remove U.S. Attorneys (this ain’t it).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This has probably been brought up, but I haven’t seen it: did Bush even know about the forced resignations until they hit the news? And why do I constantly feel like there’s no one in the cockpit here?</p>
<p>EDIT: or for a better analogy, it’s like riding “the bus” the Bushie trolls always crow about driving, glancing across the aisle, and seeing Georgie sitting in the back with his nose buried in a Little Golden Book and swinging his feet. Someone might be driving the bus (poorly and recklessly, mowing down pedestrians), but it isn’t the kid with the lollipop and snot-stained sleeves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: browny</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-664617</link>
		<dc:creator>browny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-664617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gonzales should never have been confirmed.  His brown nose is so far up the ass of GWBush and Karl Rove.  Bush is in a pickle.  If he lets Gonzo go, anyone else who might be confirmed by the Dem Senate at this point would be in the position of having to blow the whistle or resign immediately.  It is crystal clear that those bastards have politicized the DOJ and criminal prosecutions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Who wants to bet that they have politicized the NSA info?  NIxon needed a break-in by the plumbers to juice his campaign.  Who wants to bet that Bush and Rove have been doing the same thing with high tech tools?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gonzales should never have been confirmed.  His brown nose is so far up the ass of GWBush and Karl Rove.  Bush is in a pickle.  If he lets Gonzo go, anyone else who might be confirmed by the Dem Senate at this point would be in the position of having to blow the whistle or resign immediately.  It is crystal clear that those bastards have politicized the DOJ and criminal prosecutions. </p>
<p> Who wants to bet that they have politicized the NSA info?  NIxon needed a break-in by the plumbers to juice his campaign.  Who wants to bet that Bush and Rove have been doing the same thing with high tech tools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idahogie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663226</link>
		<dc:creator>idahogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663226</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wasn’t Gonzales’s statement during his testimoney two weeks ago that the final list of attorneys was the ‘consensus opinion of the senior DOJ staff?’  How could he say that when he’d delegated staffing decisions to two particular people?  Isn’t this the most easily provable lie ever told by anybody in congressional testimony?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn’t Gonzales’s statement during his testimoney two weeks ago that the final list of attorneys was the ‘consensus opinion of the senior DOJ staff?’  How could he say that when he’d delegated staffing decisions to two particular people?  Isn’t this the most easily provable lie ever told by anybody in congressional testimony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiredFed</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663130</link>
		<dc:creator>TiredFed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;oh, and we need 16-17 Republican Senators (2/3s of Senators present) to convict.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and we need 16-17 Republican Senators (2/3s of Senators present) to convict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiredFed</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663128</link>
		<dc:creator>TiredFed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-663104&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bob Schacht @ 160&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662901&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;tbsa @&lt;br /&gt;
                100              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Mary McCurnin @ 58&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no time to impeach that doesn’t mean&lt;br /&gt;
they can’t be tried in a court of law and sent to the big house. 
&lt;p&gt;We should never let this rest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no way is hell the republic party would allow chimpco to be impeached. . . . .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that this point of view is rapidly becoming obsolete. Of course there are some Republicans who will stampede with Bush over the cliff. But those who are facing re-election in 2008 (i.e., all of the House and 1/3 of the Senate) must be thinking about whether Bush helps or hurts their re-election chances. And the Republicans who are up for re-election are beginning to see that voting for impeachment helps them more than it hurts them. The tipping point is coming soon, and all we need is 10 Republican Senators to see the light.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the time the House writes Articles of Impeachment, light bulbs will be popping “on” in the heads of many GOPer Senators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;no one could have anticipated that 98-0 vote against Bush on the Patriot Act revision, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-663104"><em>Bob Schacht @ 160</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-662901"><em>tbsa @<br />
                100              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><blockquote>Mary McCurnin @ 58<br />
If there is no time to impeach that doesn’t mean<br />
they can’t be tried in a court of law and sent to the big house. </p>
<p>We should never let this rest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is no way is hell the republic party would allow chimpco to be impeached. . . . .</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that this point of view is rapidly becoming obsolete. Of course there are some Republicans who will stampede with Bush over the cliff. But those who are facing re-election in 2008 (i.e., all of the House and 1/3 of the Senate) must be thinking about whether Bush helps or hurts their re-election chances. And the Republicans who are up for re-election are beginning to see that voting for impeachment helps them more than it hurts them. The tipping point is coming soon, and all we need is 10 Republican Senators to see the light.</p>
<p>By the time the House writes Articles of Impeachment, light bulbs will be popping “on” in the heads of many GOPer Senators.</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
</blockquote>
<p>no one could have anticipated that 98-0 vote against Bush on the Patriot Act revision, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiredFed</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663124</link>
		<dc:creator>TiredFed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-663098&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Brisingamen @ 159&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662894&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;perris @ 94 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;you can and should impeach after the term is done, we have to discredit everything, every decision, every single thing he’s done and we need an impeachment to do it for posterity&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You &lt;em&gt;can’t&lt;/em&gt; impeach someone once they leave office, it can only be done while they are part of the current Administration. Impeachment is used to remove wrongdoers from positions of power, usuallly on the grounds of abuse of said power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nope. sorry, but you can impeach after someone leaves office (altho prior Senates have decided it was a moot point once the perp was gone). impeachment can extend beyond removal to keeping someone from ever holding public office again and from receiving emoluments (e.g., a public pension).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-663098"><em>Brisingamen @ 159</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-662894"><em>perris @ 94 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>you can and should impeach after the term is done, we have to discredit everything, every decision, every single thing he’s done and we need an impeachment to do it for posterity</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You <em>can’t</em> impeach someone once they leave office, it can only be done while they are part of the current Administration. Impeachment is used to remove wrongdoers from positions of power, usuallly on the grounds of abuse of said power.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>nope. sorry, but you can impeach after someone leaves office (altho prior Senates have decided it was a moot point once the perp was gone). impeachment can extend beyond removal to keeping someone from ever holding public office again and from receiving emoluments (e.g., a public pension).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeNYC</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663108</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663108</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From a historical perspective:  May 1 became Law Day in a successful effort to minimize the true holiday–May Day, the real Labor Day.  It’s celebrated around the world as a worker’s day.  But, not here.  We are stuck with the first Monday of September.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a historical perspective:  May 1 became Law Day in a successful effort to minimize the true holiday–May Day, the real Labor Day.  It’s celebrated around the world as a worker’s day.  But, not here.  We are stuck with the first Monday of September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Schacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662901&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;tbsa @&lt;br /&gt;
                100              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Mary McCurnin @ 58&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no time to impeach that doesn’t mean&lt;br /&gt;
they can’t be tried in a court of law and sent to the big house. 
&lt;p&gt;We should never let this rest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no way is hell the republic party would allow chimpco to be impeached. . . . .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that this point of view is rapidly becoming obsolete. Of course there are some Republicans who will stampede with Bush over the cliff. But those who are facing re-election in 2008 (i.e., all of the House and 1/3 of the Senate) must be thinking about whether Bush helps or hurts their re-election chances. And the Republicans who are up for re-election are beginning to see that voting for impeachment helps them more than it hurts them. The tipping point is coming soon, and all we need is 10 Republican Senators to see the light.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the time the House writes Articles of Impeachment, light bulbs will be popping “on” in the heads of many GOPer Senators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-662901"><em>tbsa @<br />
                100              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><blockquote>Mary McCurnin @ 58<br />
If there is no time to impeach that doesn’t mean<br />
they can’t be tried in a court of law and sent to the big house. </p>
<p>We should never let this rest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is no way is hell the republic party would allow chimpco to be impeached. . . . .</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that this point of view is rapidly becoming obsolete. Of course there are some Republicans who will stampede with Bush over the cliff. But those who are facing re-election in 2008 (i.e., all of the House and 1/3 of the Senate) must be thinking about whether Bush helps or hurts their re-election chances. And the Republicans who are up for re-election are beginning to see that voting for impeachment helps them more than it hurts them. The tipping point is coming soon, and all we need is 10 Republican Senators to see the light.</p>
<p>By the time the House writes Articles of Impeachment, light bulbs will be popping “on” in the heads of many GOPer Senators.</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brisingamen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663098</link>
		<dc:creator>Brisingamen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663098</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662894&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;perris @ 94 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;you can and should impeach after the term is done, we have to discredit everything, every decision, every single thing he’s done and we need an impeachment to do it for posterity&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You &lt;em&gt;can’t&lt;/em&gt; impeach someone once they leave office, it can only be done while they are part of the current Administration. Impeachment is used to remove wrongdoers from positions of power, usuallly on the grounds of abuse of said power.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-662894"><em>perris @ 94 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>you can and should impeach after the term is done, we have to discredit everything, every decision, every single thing he’s done and we need an impeachment to do it for posterity</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You <em>can’t</em> impeach someone once they leave office, it can only be done while they are part of the current Administration. Impeachment is used to remove wrongdoers from positions of power, usuallly on the grounds of abuse of said power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Schacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663085</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 18:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/05/01/schooled/#comment-663085</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662844&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Balrog @&lt;br /&gt;
                45              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-662803&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jay @&lt;br /&gt;
                18              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very frightening but do you mean Bork?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bjork.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, actually that was an &lt;a href=&quot;http://startrek.wikia.com/wiki/Borg_Collective&quot;&gt;old Star Trek thing&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(please no further nesting in this group -mod)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-662844"><em>Balrog @<br />
                45              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-662803"><em>Jay @<br />
                18              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Very frightening but do you mean Bork?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bjork.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No, actually that was an <a href="http://startrek.wikia.com/wiki/Borg_Collective">old Star Trek thing</a>.</p>
<p>Bob in HI<br />
<em><br />
(please no further nesting in this group -mod)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
