
(Hard at Work image via tearbear.)
Well pups, it's time for the first report card for the 110th Congress. In Saturday's New York Times, some nice folks put together some statistics in an op-ed comparing the work product of the first 3 months of the 110th Congress (1/1/2007 to 3/31/07) with the first quarter of the 109th Congress (1/1/2005 to 3/31/2005).
And the results are actually pretty good. In almost every category measured, the new Democratic-controlled Congress has been more productive and more successful than the Republican-controlled Congress of 2005. Nice! How did this remarkable transformation come to be?
Congress is certainly working harder. The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, have set five-day work weeks as the norm, not the exception, and both chambers have been in session much more frequently in the first quarter than they were in the comparable period of the previous Congress. All measures of activity have increased: committee markups, roll call votes, measures passed, and laws enacted and signed by the president. Of course, because most bills are still in process, just how bountiful or meager the legislative harvest will be remains uncertain.
Yes, Firepups, that's the magic. No special political calculation, nope, just good old fashioned showing up to work five days a week. Yep, rolling up the sleeves and actually doing the work the American people are paying you to do instead of jet setting off for an all expense paid trip to some swank Scottish golf course with Jack Abramoff.
I suppose we should not blame the GOP too much: look at the example the President has been setting, treating the most important work in the world like a no show job. Which may explain why during the first quarter of 2005 the Republican dominated 109th House was in session a grand total of 164 hours over 27 days. By contrast Nancy Pelosi has kept the House members nose's to the grindstone for 407 hours over 49 days.
These folks were not just punching clock. The Pelosi-led Democratically controlled House of Representatives has already held 213 roll call votes and passed a total of 176 measures as compared to the 90 roll call votes held in the House during the first quarter of the 109th Cong. which managed to pass only 61 measures during that period. Can you say SLACKERS?
Over on the Senate side of the Capitol there are similar improvements. For example, Give 'em Hell Harry has presided over a Senate which has held a total of 230 oversight hearings in the first three months of 2007 (including appropriations and hearings devoted to the Iraq war), but the 109th Cong Senate held only 111 oversight hearings during the same period in 2005.
Divided government has clearly helped Congress regain its position in the constitutional order. After years of inattention, Congressional oversight of the executive has intensified, most sharply regarding the war in Iraq. And hearings have appropriately focused more on policy and administration than personal scandal. The White House is being challenged on many domestic and national security matters it took for granted with the largely compliant Republican Congresses.
I don't know about you, but I like the idea of getting my money's worth from the folks we send to the Capitol to do our nation's business.
So, congratulations 110th Congress on the improvement in work ethic and work progress. Keep it up.



263 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Number 1?
looseheadprop!
Time for our “leaders” to run around and get in front of the populace — get the troops out of Iraq, now.
Nancy and Harry are doing a great job despite what lunkheads like Broder say via the right wing noise machine.
More power to them!
LHP — Thanks so much for this post. Some good news is awfully nice to read. I, too, have that work ethic expectation — and it sure is nice to see that the Dems are doing a much, much more efficient job at the Congressional helm.
but, but . . .what will we tell Jack Kingston’s children ?!?!?
hey looseheadprop! wonderful to see it quantified
thanks!
but, but, but…this just wreaks havoc on those four-day weekend golf junkets.
Criminy! 49 days is seven weeks. Assuming those are full weeks, that means 35 working days or 11 hours a day. If that’s 49 working days, sans weekends and holidays, then it’s still 8.3 hours per day.
It’s almost as if Congress is earning its pay!
I know everyone says that it’s great that Bush spends all that time in Texas because he isn’t busy screwing up America in Washington, but clearly the Repugs are ruled from the top down. Follow Bush’s lead. Go home at 6, and take four day weekends at the ranch. What an example he sets.
punaise @ 7
They can’t afford it anyway, what with Abramoff gone.
Loved Murtha’s idea of congress only giving Clusterfuck two or three months war funding at a time.
It might occur to some of the brighter congresscritters that if they do this- THEY can set the timetable. They could grant- say- three months funding and announce that the next three months funding will only be approved if the Iraqis do this and Clusterfuck does THAT. In other words- they BEAT Clusterfuck at his asinine game. Hope they do it!! There is no downside to this (other than being forced to vote on the issue every few months.)
LHP,
Has anybody compared Lieberman’s performance then to his performance now, or his performance NOW to that of other Dem senators NOW? I realize he was previously in the minority.
Since you’re on LHP, I have a question for you. Some bloggers were discussing the possibility of Condi refusing the subpoena when it comes. And they referred to something called “inherent contempt power” which has not been used for 70 years. It gave me the impression that Chairman Waxman and the committee would be able to go around having the DOJ represent them in a subpoena fight with Rice. Do you know anything about this? Thanks.
LHP.
Good Morning. Thank you for the post hilighting our 110th. Cheers to the 110th♥.
Boehner and Lieberman on Cspan talking about congress and partisanship. Blech
But didn’t they not actually work 5-day weeks? I know that was the plan, but I heard not too long ago something like “but they haven’t actually done it yet.”
I don’t know where to look this up. I do remember them taking a long weekend for some sports thing…ach I’m light on details. Anyone have actual stats on this?
The WaPo has some great video from Rep. Clyburn (D-SC)’s annual fish fry. Several Dem. Presidential candidates were there and spoke. Personally, I found the Edwards bit to be particularly well done. See what you think…
Sorry Cspan2
Albaross 49 days in seesion out of 90 days in the quarter.It’s 49 days spread over 12 weeks. Still.
49 days into 407 hours is an impressive almost 8.2 hours per day. It’s like they were reall working folks
here’s hoping they take time out of their schedule to impeach cheney, then bush.
they’ve got to wipe that slate clean, start over and wipe out the R’s for good.
the world will be a better place.
spinn at 15 — They have been working 4-day legislative weeks, and saving Fridays for hearings for the committees — atleast for the most part, anyway, although they’ve done five-day weeks here and there depending on the legislative calendar. There is so much oversight to be done on so many different issues that they have had to work that into the scheduling mix. At least, that’s my understanding.
ET at 12.
He still is.
Kinda like going to a fancy restaurant, “Party of One, Sir?”
Ed*ard Teller @ 12
You mean how often he shows up to committee hearings or to vote?
Or do mean how many bills with his name on ‘em get passed?
If anyone has done that analysis, I’m unaware of it.
Oh, wait…sorry, there were stats in the post, I should’ve read better. So total hours is pretty indicative, I might’ve read the “haven’t really done 5-day weeks” thing on a conservative blog somewhere, but given the total amount of work done, it’s misleading, I suppose.
Also, people: Stop with the incorrect possessives! It’s not the “House members nose’s”, it’s “House members’ noses”. I suppose I’m one of three English-speaking people on the planet who cares about this anymore, but it just makes your writing look unprofessional.
naschkatze @ 13
They don’t have to go through DOJ — the House and Senate each have a Sergeant at Arms who just happens to be able to arrest those who fail to appear when supoena’d. If said person is found to be in contempt of Congress they can be imprisoned…rumor has it that there are cells in the basement of the Capitol.
looseheadprop @ 22
yeah – stuff like that. I guess I’ll call it “productivity.”
spinn — It is probably a typo. We’re more than happy to get constructive criticism, but try phrasing it in a slightly nicer way next time, okay? As someone who makes typos alla time when she puts her articles together, I can sympathize with anyone else making them. It happens. Especially when you don’t have a paid editorial staff cleaning up after you.
Too bad the report card didn’t include a few words about a bill put forth by Senators Kennedy (D-MA)and Enzi (R-WY).
In classic Orwellian double-speak, it’s called the Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act and it’s a major expansion of FDA powers that, among other things, targets dietary supplements.
The bill (S1082) is scheduled for a floor vote today, meaning only vote totals are recorded, not how each senator voted.
http://www.lef.org/featured-ar…..042707.htm has a form for e-mailing your senators.
Just as I was thinking Kennedy was someone I could trust…
EPU’d from last thread but on topic here:
Biodun @ 97
Oh, and footnote: I’m glad that whatever catchy phrase some cons were trying to make popular–something like “investigation, not legislation”–doesn’t seem to be making traction. I’ve heard a few people grumbling about Congress tying itself up in investigations and not actually getting anything done. Despite the fact that it’s clearly wrong, this sort of thing usually makes the talking point rounds fairly easily, and I’m glad it see it’s not working on this one.
Maybe the point a few have made about a “sea change in politics” has some merit? Hope so.
p.s. on apostrophes: yeah, sorry, my pet peeve got the better of me. It’s just been happening a number of times on FDL posts recently. (especially the “it’s”, ooooh, I hateses it…)
THIS JUST IN: The CBS Evening News has decided NOT to run the interview they did with me on Friday about Obama after all.
I knew this was a distinct possibility so I can’t claim to be disappointed.
But the Democrat Coongress supports a “Surrender Date” and is “Waving a White Flag” to “Embolden the Enemy.” Nancy Pelosi i trying to “Micromanage the War.” How can Democrats Confirm General Petraeus But Oppose His Mission?”
To see which Iraq sound bites are on – and off – the Republicans’ approved talking points list, see:
“Mission Accomplished: 4 Years of GOP Iraq Talking Points.”
David at 30 — Oh, what a shame! Do you know if they may run it at some future date and, if so, please let us know if they do!
naschkatze @ 13
Condi can go to court and make a motion to “quash” the subpoena (not squash as you will sometimes see people say, Though the idea is similar).
In that case, Congress will be epresentedby DOJ b/c it is the governments “law firm” for all instnces where the gov’t is a denfendant.
If she loses in court and still doesn’t show up, she is in contempt of court.
However, if she does not go to court to quash the subpoena and just doesn’t show up, Congress has several options:
During the Teapot Dome scandals Congress had a similar situation where DOJ was part of the problem and could not be counted on to enforce the subpoena via arrest by the US Marshall’s Service. So, they did a clever thing. They had the House Sgt. at Arms dispatch a memebr of his staff to go arrest the subpoenaed witness and bring him in to testify. This was subsequently upheld in court.
Alternatively, they can ask DOJ to make a motion in court to enforce the subpoena, ask DOJ to have a federal mrshall arrest the witness or take a vote in the House to find the witness in contempt of Congress.
I am very proud of my 110th Congress. What a comeback. I’ll have some more,please!
Criminy… 164 hours over 27 days. In 27 days at one station where I worked, I put in 288 hours, and I’m spotting them 3 Sundays I might have gotten for days off!
loosehead
Thanks for the history lesson on the powers of congress- badly needed information.
spinn @ 23
Umm – LHP is the first to admit that she makes some typos, and is grateful for people who respectfully bring them to her attention. To say that you are only “one of three English-speaking people on the planet” is a bit insulting to LHP as well as everyone here at the Lake, I would say.
This is a blog – not a book. Personally, I am grateful for all of the time people spend posting and commenting that I cut everyone a lot of slack, and hope they do the same for me.
spinn @ 15
49 days out of 90 would be less than a 5 day week. 90 days in the quarter – 24 days for week ends = 66 days.
So, they are not there yet (also I did not account for holidays didn’t know how to deal with Lincoln’s Birthday, Washington’s Birthday vs. President’s Day)
Rats. Earwig went from Blind Faith to Huey Lewis. ::blech::
EPUd from last thread.
Quote from Richard Perle by Clive Stafford Smith in “Bad Men: Guantamo Bay and the Secret Prisons” (a must read by the way) “The rule of law to which you refer is domestic law and doesn’t apply to non-American citizens. It just doesn’t”.
I can think of no sufficient comment.
Thanks, LHP. I guess the bloggers were referring to the Teapot Dome Scandal in the discussion of “inherent contempt power”. 70 years ago would be close enough.
looseheadprop @ 38
It’s President’s Day, for federal employees, and I think they had some long weekends, to get back to their districts. They also had something like spring break, when many of them took fact-finding trips. Just because Reps aren’t in session doesn’t mean they aren’t working for us.
Just saying…
Brisingaman
Really? That would be very cool. It would be one for the history books if they used them on Condi. where did you hear that?
KathieinMN @ 37
You cut off my “…that cares about this anymore” at the end of that quote. I wasn’t saying I have a near-monopoly on English. I’ve just seen this incorrect apostrophe thing increase over time over the years (and it’s come up frequently in FDL, in the short time I’ve been reading). And whenever I bring it up, most people don’t care (in a “you know what I meant” kind of way), which is what I meant by that.
But anyway, I apologized @ 29.
looseheadprop
this post is great, thanks for laying it all out!
and lolo: Zed Zunday Zweep! you did it!
When I told my (ultra) conservative uncle that Bush had spent more than a YEAR at his ranch on vacation during his Presidency, he refused to believe it.
looseheadprop @18
There’s another extremely important detail going on, which we FirePups must keep in mind.
As long as our Senators are working this hard (and you can bet there’s a lot going on that’s not actually tracked as hours on the Senate floor or in Committees, since research and staff meetings and strategizing has to happen some time), they are not at home raising money for their next run.
This is good news-bad news; good news, in that the Repug Senators can’t spend time pressing the flesh to get money. Bad news, since our Dems aren’t, either. Worse, our Dems rely more on the people-to-people fundraising than Repugs do since their machine-type politics ensures that the money will eventually get to them without as many appearances.
If your Dem Senator is running for 2008, seriously consider making a donation to their campaign NOW, since early money is the best kind — and send a thank you note with it, letting them know you’ve noticed the increased work they’ve put in.
OT–but related:
War on Terror ain’t working. From AP:
KathieinMN @ 37
Thanks for all the defense, but actually, I don’t mind having them pointed out. I really cannot see my own typos. For work, I alwys have to have somebody else proof read.
Now, someone else’s typos–those I can spot at 50 paces. Go figure!
looseheadprop @ 43
I overheard a tour guide with a group outside the Capitol building when I was in DC for training a couple of years ago. I have never been certain if he was telling the truth or joking.
naschkatze @ 13
KagroX has written some diaries at DKos about this, here’s the latest which contains some links to his older posts.
spinn @ 29
I second Christy’s request for orthographic and grammatical tolerance. People here are posting from trains, PDR’s and in other challenging situations. Some of the smartest, wisest people here are famous for their typos. Some of us just can’t type for diddly. There is some mighty fine thinking here, and yes, some of it is mispelled.
Brisingamen @ 24
I would love a postcard of Condi in the Capitol basement cell. And would pay big Congressional bucks for one of Rove.
do-si-do @ 53
What I’d like to see is Bush and Cheney in orange jumpsuits, cuffs and shackles, with a banner over them reading: “Mission Accomplished.”
Yeah, um, okay then uh…take it as a compliment! It’s only because I expect so much from FDL that I said anything grumble mutter okay hiding under the cardboard box now
looseheadprop @ 33
If DOJ does refuse to bring in Condi, just more evidence of DOJ corruption. I say go for it.
Brisingamen @ 54
Good one. Yes, it’s becoming a whole line of collectibles, isn’t it?
naschkatze @ 41
Long ago (and not just in the US Congress) the term Seargent at Arms, menat just that. A sgt. with a squad of armed men who would carry out the will of the body in question, maintain order in the case of physical violence between debators and protect the body from angry mobs.
Now, they are largely vestigial like the Swiss Guard at the Vatican. (though the Swiss Guard in recent years have gone from being dress up soldiers for the tourist, to actuall soldiers trained in modern armements.)
I know that the Sgt. at Arms was involved (as keeper of the peace in the House) in negotiating he terms for the execution of he search warrant in the Jeffords case.
I don’t know whether or not current Sgt. at Arms staff are trained in arrest procedures or even if they own handcuffs!
Something maybe for some first hand reporting if Condi decides to skip out on testifying?
Biodun @ 48
Count on the administration to spin this news as “good” as in “the Murkin public has gotta unnerstand, we got the terrorists on the run and that’s why terrorism is going up, up, up.”
OT
“also on Palfrey’s list of customers who could be potential witnesses are a Bush administration economist, the head of a conservative think tank, a prominent CEO, several lobbyists and a handful of military officials.”
tpmmuckraker
Cozumel @ 60
If there were Democrats on the list, wouldn’t they be splashed all over the media by now?
BTW, tomorrow is “Mission Accomplished Day,” here’s a photo for your commemorative post, Christy:
http://www.larrytt.com/cartoon….._final.jpg
*g*
Re: spelling and typos:
One can be a good writer and a bad speller.
One can be a good speller and a bad writer.
One can be a good writer and a good speller.
One can be a bad writer and a bad speller.
Copyeditors can fix bad spelling and–only to a certain extent–bad writing.
Some bad writing cannot be fixed even by good editors.
Compared with other blogs, IMHO, the writing at FDL is exquisite.
And typos? They’re usually obvious–and can be caught by professional proofreaders with a good eye. And they are no big deal.
Badwater @ 61
Why, yes, they would. Ain’t that a coincidence?
Just thinkin about the “Murtha Plan”.
Wouldn’t Clusterfuck just SHIT?
He vetos the dem funding bill- cause it has a timetable and benchmarks attached- so the dems send him a “clean” bill but with only two months funding and announce that if he wants any more in two months- he and the Iraqis will have to meet certain timetables and benchmarks..
If he vetoes the two month bill- HE’S the one fuckin over the funding for the troops- and he has no grounds to reject it cause the timetables and benchmarks aren’t IN the bill- they’re a separate statement from congress..
Fuckin Genius Murtha- this changes the balance of power on the war issue- so simple and yet so deadly- if yer a Clusterfucker.
spinn @ 55
FDL, savin’ the world with as good spellin’ an’ grammar as we can manage. And helping is OK, and this is as good a place as any to learn how to get along. *G* PS You would have loved it the other day when Hugh was correctin’ our Latin.
rwcole @ 65
Unlike any of Bush’s cronies, Murtha has practical combat experience.
Bringing LJ/Aquaria’s quote over from another thread…this is exactly right. Since when can you protect civil rights by taking them away?
I also wish to strongly point out what seems painfully obvious: CLAIMING UNLIMITED EXECUTIVE POWER DURING WARTIME IS TOO STRONG AN INCENTIVE TO DECLARE AND/OR CONTINUE WAR.
End the President’s Dictator Wartime status.
spinn @ 55
compliment taken. Really, I don’t mind at all.
rwcole @ 65
According to CNN’s Dana Bash the votes aren’t even close that will fly, FWIW
(((Christy’s hard work)))
Republican Congress: Get the bill from the WH or the lobbyists, twist some arms, pass the bill, go play golf.
I’m sorry, where was the reading part? Ohhh, that’s right. Reading the bills was sooo pre-9/11.
Democratic Congress: Show up for work, craft legislation, engage in debate, propose, compromise or reach consensus, READ the bill, vote on bill, pass bill. During the rest of the day, do oversight.
What’s strange is that it looks so weird when it’s *supposed* to be standard operating procedure.
Cozumel @ 60
I wonder which think tank?
Professor Prop, thank you for you time and thought, you are a jewel in the crown of the Lake. And all thanks to the Ladies. Rockin’ place you got here.
tpres2000 @ 27
There’s another bill on this also, apparently competing. A friend was telling me that she can’t get at the actual text of either one. One of them she started at one page, got referred through two or three links, and ended up on the same page where she started, without ever seeing the actual text they were theoretically linking to.
Personally, I think supplements should be regulated. If the manufacturers are the ones who control what’s in them and what information the consumer has, you end up like the herbal supplements, with claims that are not true and ingredients that may not be what they’re labelled as, or the homeopathic stuff with ingredients labelled in Latin so you can’t tell what they really are (and quantities that aren’t specified). Not that FDA regulation is necessarily better…
EvilDrPuma @ 67
Ding!
I’ll forgive everybody’s misplaced apostrophys in exchange for everybody forgiving my spelling.
rwcole @ 65
It’s almost like the Congressional equivalant of those damn signing stattments
nice post looseheadprop
I also like the idea of congress getting my moneys worth from the laws we enact
no more buying our law, no more buying our country, no more exporting our jobs to countries that don’t have collective bargaining for their workforce
they want to do bussiness in America?
they have to allow their workforce to bargain for the price the corporations pay for the product they need
no more “the corporations get to set the price of the goods they need”
for a democracy to survive, the workforce HAS TO BE ABLE TO BROKER THEIR VALUE JUST LIKE ALL OTHER COMODITIES
so no more buying law, no more exporting our jobs to countries because they get slave labor
lolo @ 14
Teehee! Where to go after all programs, lolo?
itwasntme @ 77
“apostrophies” ;)
I’m certain you guys have this, but just in case…
Embattled World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz is allegedly working to secure a $400,000 bonus due to him on June 1 before he resigns his position, according to the blog The Washington Note.
holy crappola
LHP
Yep- I was just thinkin the same thing- congressional signing statements- funny.
So what excuse would congresscritters use for not voting for it?
I wonder if Wolfowitz is really involved in the madam scandal.
OT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/…..fer=energy
The national average for regular gasoline is $2.94 today.
Gas prices are always manipulated but the games that are currently being played to boost the price to $3/gallon this early in the season are particularly brazen. If you remember back to Enron’s creation of the California 2000-2001 electricity disaster, maintenance was a favorite excuse for shutting down power stations and putting the squeeze on the electricity market. This is what we are seeing now with gasoline. We are being taken to the cleaners again and the media coverage of it has been virtually non-existent.
Cozumel @ 70
What does Dana know? She’s a newsreader. Heck, we get all tingly when she asks an intelligent question, like that’s not supposed to be the norm.
I think the next bill SHOULD be tougher than the first, not easier or cleaner. Bush should be aware that the noose will get tighter as time goes on, not looser. Parents do that all of the time:
“I want three cookies.”
“You can have two cookies.”
“No, I want three cookies.”
“Ok, you can have two cookies or one cookie. It’s your choice.”
See, my theory is that George’s parents were either absent, neglectful or lax. In any case, he didn’t get the proper restraint and discpline he needed as a child. Well, now he will.
P J Evans @ 75
Uhm, beg pardon, but those Latin Names that are on the lables of homeopathic remedies are the correct name of the plants (genus/species) from which the product was made.
You should be able to look them up in any modern herbal, or even Google for them. I like to garden, and so have been familiar with these for many years.
looseheadprop @ 73
She’s got a page of her August 1996 Sprint bill here. (warning .pdf). DC is full of renters, congresscritters come and go, lots a folks have cellphones, so I wasn’t surprised that most of the numbers I’ve checked out don’t show up on reverse phone lookups. One good number was a Day’s Inn — no help there, another seemed to be a law firm (couldn’t trace further). But a thinktank, now *that* should have a stable number. Anyone care to have a look? Any educated guesses?
itwasntme @ 77
Done!
ccmask @ 84
Is there reason to believe he is? Or is this wishful thinking?
Cozumel @ 70
plus, the president has plenty of funding to last a few months on top of the two murtha wants to give, in essence giving the president close to a year before he has to come back
this is a no op as far as I am concerned
I want pelosi to say’
“you vetoed the funding we gave our troops?
what, are you out of your mind?…how do you expect them to get the resources they need to complete the mission?
if you don’t want to give them the resources that is your perogative as commander in chief but the American people won’t stand for it.
since you refuse to give the soldiers the resources neccessary for their deployment we will send you a bill that will provide the resources neccessary to bring them home
you have stretched them too thin, you have squandered the states assets and we need to replenish and renew our national security
we will send you the money for our troops one more time, the next time we will send you the funding to bring them home”
that’s what I want to see the first female president say to the current president
Makes ya understand the REAL reason the oil companies aren’t building any more refineries.
The “JUST BARELY ENOUGH” refinery capacity gives them the perfect vehicle to mess with supply and jack up prices…fuckers.
looseheadprop….
Thank you so much…. As part of our DFA meetings we have been reading sections of the Constitution in connection to current events.
My theme this month was Oversite and now I have the stats to back this up. (I know it is implied-that will be included in the discussion)
One question… how many subpoenas have been issues so far?
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., has dropped the use of her maiden name “Rodham” in her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination,” Hearst Newspapers will report in Monday papers in advance excerpts acquired by RAW STORY
oh, really.
portia.vz says
.
Not exactly…
Dana Bash is CNN’s congressional correspondent, responsible for covering the activities of both the U.S. House and Senate.
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/anchors……dana.html
Solai @ 90
Wishful thinking. You never know though.
JF @ 81
“apostrophes” (source, Purdue University online writing lab)
P J Evans @ 75
For some reason some of the bigger herbal supplements companies are HQ’ed on Lawn Guyland and some of them are clients of mine.
Though I know my clients are fighting this kind of regulation (or any regulation) tooth and nail b/c they are terrified of being subjected to the smae kind of expensive testing require ments as phramasutical companies, I actuall think some regulation would be good for the reputable supplement companies.
There are a lot of quacks out there and the amount of active ingredient in a given herb sample can vary greatly depending on growing condition and how carefully the herb is stored.
Also, with some of the smaller mom and pop herbal businesses, incomplete drying leads to shipment tainted with mold and mildew which can be toxic.
There should be some set of uniform standrds, and uniform quality control. Right now, it is so random it is sometimes quite dangerous.
perris @ 91
I LIKE IT!
Solai @ 90
the reason to believe he is would be;
how the hell could he get someone without paying?
ccmask @ 82
To quote Atrios, ‘What a wanker’.
It defines imagination. His reputation is shot to hell and he’s bargaining for 400 grand? No wonder these guys made Enron the company it is today.
ccmask @ 94
Who is advising this woman? And how much are they making? She’s being robbed.
P J Evans @ 75
Seems like the Bush administration’s “unfettered free market” just enables people to lie about what things can do and sell them (drugs, supplements, invasions) without any accountability.
Hugh @ 85
Bingo!
Which is exactly why I suggested downstairs a few days ago that the US should go into the refinery business as a matter of national security.
lhp, great post – can we sue for our money back from the 109th for governing not done?
looseheadprop @ 69
IAACE (I am a copy editor) who loosed up on the its/it’s problem in blogs when I saw “it’s” used for “its” in the US CONSTITUTION!
:-PPPP
LJ/Aquaria @ 42
MLK day
knut wicksell @ 101
And the irony…I’ll wager he gets it.
They’re such an offensive bunch that they get paid just to go away.
A few nights after he resigned his post as secretary of state two years ago, Colin L. Powell answered a ring at his front door. Standing outside was Prince Bandar, then Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States, with a 1995 Jaguar. Mr. Powell’s wife, Alma, had once mentioned that she missed their 1995 Jaguar, which she and her husband had traded in. Prince Bandar had filed that information away, and presented the Powells that night with an identical, 10-year-old model. The Powells kept the car — a gift that the State Department said was legal — but recently traded it away.
same place as the 15 hijackers
HotFlash @ 97
Do’h!
spinn @
29
Congress wouldn’t have to work nearly as hard if BushCo minions would testify fully and truthfully the first time.
How many times has AGAG been called up to the Judiciary Committees, to “clarify” his earlier testimony?
How many times has Rice been called upon to “complete” her earlier incomplete testimony?
How many times must Congress send written follow up questions, because the in-person testimony has been found to be at odds with the documentation (memos, emails, etc.) of the activities of the administration?
If administration testimony was clear, coherent, and complete the first time, Congress might not have to spend so much time on followup hearings.
must do some work, catch all L8ter
Christy Hardin Smith @
20
That’s exactly it. In the words of one aide who couldn’t speak on the record because he/she is involved in at least one of the probes, every single tree they’ve barked up has had a cat in it. Warren Gamaliel Harding’s administration was squeaky-clean compared to BushCo.
Hugh @ 85
Oh, we in CA remember . . . and if it wasn’t for the tanker wreck that has totally messed with getting around in the Bay Area, this would be getting a lot more attention around here.
Thanks, Hugh!
rwcole @
92
The solution to this is obvious: We need to starve them of cash. Carpool, take mass transit, get a smaller car, bike to work, get a Vespa (my personal choice ;-), switch to alternative fuels. Oh, it will take some time to do it but the less we rely on the bastards, the better off we’ll be.
looseheadprop @ 73
Port a potty on Canal.
Know what else this does?
It makes it very difficult for the Republicans to go out and fundraise — and this at a time when lobbyist dollars no longer simply drop into their laps, thanks to the demise of th K Street Project.
Cozumel @
95
And we *still* get all tingly when she asks an intelligent question.
If bills/legislation is being debated, and decisions are being hashed out then the job is getting done. I dont see where your totalling of ‘how many bills were passed/unit time’ actually tells us anything. Upping the number of hours spent in session should help but pushing a large number of bills through (without debate??) doesnt strike me as a good thing, and if there is debate on some of the more contentious topics the # of bills passed will suffer.
Portia
yeah I SELL Vespas- and ride one myself…100 mpg kinda gets em where they live.
rwcole and STTP in Ohio, the first refineries went down in California a few months ago. It was like a dry run for what is happening now. And what is happening now has actually been going on for several weeks. Real maintenance could have been done in winter or early spring and staggered instead it is only occurring now and all at the same time. Call me skeptical.
When the rethugs ran things they worked 6.02 hours a day. The dems work 8.2 hours a day. The time difference spent playing golf and campaign contributions accumulation. Hmmmmm.
Unfortunately, with the Chimperor doing recess appointments left and right there isn’t going to be any time for your favorite reps campaigns. Like someone said above give early ( I know they will keep trying to milk you, but do it anyway ) Our people need to walk the walls are we could have even worse shoved down our throats. Can you just imaging during a recess AGAG steps down to be replaced by fill in the blank horrific wing nut.
LHP: Great post. It is great when someone takes the time to find something good and singles it out. Pats on the back always help no matter who you are.
katymine @ 93
Honestly, I have lost track. Partially because until recently I working till midnight most nights and really didn’t keep up with the news.
Partially because there are subpoenas that have been autorized but not issued, so the count is a little confusing.
HotFlash @ 102:
From AP:
HotFlash @ 97
Oh, this is too funny
Brisingamen @ 87
Two years of HS biology, a quarter in college (and a quarter of botany), and a year working in a nursery (where the paperwork from the field would say things like ‘Arbustos unedo’ or ‘Nissan silvatica’).
But most people don’t have a clue about formal naming. (Some of those homeopathic names do leave me scratching my head.)
apostrophes’s
from the Purdue link of HotFlash at 95:
Apostrophes are NOT used for possessive pronouns or for noun plurals, including acronyms
folks, folks! let’s not get all acronymious about this.
The Law of Experts:
For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert.
punaise @ 128
A capital idea. Or is that capitol? And should it be “Folks, folks! Let’s . . .”?
egregious @ 127
O, shall I apostrophize an ‘? “Thou tiny appendage of possessiveness & pluralization… why art thou so damn confusable??” ?
REP. ADAM PUTNAM (R), FLORIDA: Well, I agree with Jane. While it’s entertaining to talk about Tenet’s new $4 million book deal, what is of primary concern to me is getting the funding to the tens of thousands of troops right now who are in harm’s way, who are running out of reinforcements and ammunition and bullets and body armor and everything else.
It is the situation at hand that, to me, is far more important than the book deal that everyone in the press has hold of, but it isn’t even available for sale around America until tomorrow.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRA…..le.01.html
Puleese.
One good book I bought but only read some of it is “Eats Shoots & Leaves”, by Lynne Truss. It a a NYT Best Seller about punctuation. For any “sticklers” out there, this is a must read.
This is from Lynne, which describes why punctuation is so important:
A panda walks into a caf. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and proceeds to fire it at the other patrons.
“Why?” asks the confused, surviving waiter amidst the carnage, as the panda makes towards the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.
“Well, I’m a panda,” he says at the door. “Look it up.”
The waiter turns to the relevant entry in the manual and, sure enough, finds an explanation. “Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves.”
Truss wiki page
punaise @ 128
You mean Bernard Privot’s old TV program “Apostrophe” don’t you?
Punaise, that is just awesome.
lhp @ 98
We’re on the same page there. I thought it was a bad idea to let the herbal stuff go more-or-less unregulated. (At least they pulled ephedra.)
a trophy for atrophied apostrophes.
ItsIt’s theprincipalprinciple of the thing.These posts are atrophying into acronymious trophy-seeking by cronies.
Biodun @ 134
au pluriel, mon vieux: Apostrophes
Phoenix Woman @ 116
I don’t know about any demise. Al D’Amato is still supposedly sprinkling cash around
If Gonzo doesn’t answer his unanswered questions, he really should be found in Contempt of Congress as a prelude to forcible removal from office.
Has anyone gotten any insight into the OPR and AIG investigations – from which Gonzo recused himself? Are OPR and AIG now under the direct control of Bush?
I heard Gonzo tell Leahy in the ‘re-confirmation hearing’ that there aren’t any other active DoJ investigations into the USAs.
He’s politically smothering the operational goals – prosecution of wrongdoing – of OUR DoJ. It’s a slap in our faces to keep him on as the AG.
Peterr @ 130
It was Pierre Charles L’Enfant who had the capital idea and William Thornton who had a Capitol one. *g*
I like this meaning right here (from dictionary.com):
P J Evans @ 126
Sing it, sister! The looks I get at garden shows when identify the plant the way my Mom taught me (she was strict about not using the common names) never fails to make me chuckle.
And the pronunciation debates! Is it CLEM-ahtis or Clem-AH-tis?
The thing with homeopathic labels that gives me a chill is the number of poisons listed. Yes, I know they’re present in microscopic amounts, but still…
punaise:
merci bien…j’oublie…
Ahh yes, there are far more important things to Putz-nam, but he just happens to know when the book hits the Borders…
I do hope you are correct that we get what we pay for by taxes from our representatives
however, I am not naive enough to believe that most take their orders from other people. My state elected representative says so publicly. My congressional rep does as well.
let us not think that a campaign donation is more important than anything else, but I am jaded
As the sun is rising here in Honolulu, I find this:
Rep. Murtha is not just a rank & file Democrat; Speaker Pelosi had chosen him for Majority Whip.
The momentum is building! Impeachment is back on the table!
Bob in HI
OT – The head of the British army said Monday that he had personally decided that Prince Harry, the third in line to the throne, will serve with a combat unit in Iraq,
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200…..harry_iraq
Why is it that no members of the Bush Royal Family are willing to serve?
Well this is kind of funny. Someone wrote a parody book wrt Lynne Truss’s. Seen here at Amazon, the name of the book is “Eats, Shites & Leaves: Crap English and How to Use It”parody book
ccmask @ 122
We never hesitate to bash when they do something wrong, we should “attaboy” them when they do well
looseheadprop @
98
I agree to the need for some kind of regulations, esp. as to the accuracy of the contents of the pills/bottles. What is going on out there is wholesale theft by some of the biggest companies. I am a close friend of a vit. store owner, and he avers to this as true.
Problem is, the vit. industry will resist because it means being dragged through the FDA approval process, plus many companies now making money hand over fist would have to start being honest.
But as a rule of thumb, you can depend on this: buying cheap vitamins is no bargain because those are the worst offenders…not mentioning any brands. As in other things, to get value you have to pony up the bucks.
I will go so far as to say I would never buy vits. from a drug store, or from the giant outlets. If you find an honest vit. purveyor with a good product line, you are lucky.
Hugh @ 120
What makes me nuts is this is all so obvious.
If the U.S. started building refineries, the price of gas would go down immediately.
I know this administration would never do it, but this administration is all but over.
For those who haven’t seen it yet, I’m begging you to see “The Smartest Guys In The Room” re:Enron. Floor traders routinely called power plants and asked them to shut down just to squeeze supply and therefore raise prices.
As Hugh has pointed out, this is exactly what’s happening now.
I also understand Congress is a little busy right now with the subpoenas flying everywhere, but this needs to needs to be fast tracked right after Karl Rove’s e-mails surface. (also known as endgame.)
Hugh @ 120
I think they tested it out on us first. We had a refinery fire in Sarnia ON (BIG refinery town, in Canada near Detroit) refinery fire in Hamilton ON (nr Toronto) here in Feb, supposed to be fixed ‘by the weekend’. Then there was another in Winnipeg, I think, I remember hearing about it on the radio but can’t find a ref now. Doesn’t matter.
Gas is around $1.059 CAD/litre here in Toronto, that’s about 3.60 USD/gal.
You know it’s so funny that Republican’t have no idea what is going on out in the public arena. Take Rudy (Please!). He thinks he did such a great job wrt 911 because he was on the street in front of a camera. There are thousands of people who outclassed him, as we watched the work being done on ground zero. So many firefighters are sick. And he thinks he did marvelous.
America’s Mayor? Bite me Rudy. Any other 911 survivors running for President in 2008?
egregious @ 127
apostrophi
Well I don’t think that the government should be building refineries.
This administration says that the industry won’t build em cause of the laws that don’t allow em ta pollute as much as they have a moral right to- but when given a chance, the oil companies won’t build em anyway.
I used to work for a company that ended up owning a refinery- kinda by accident. They don’t make money!!
I didn’t mean that “Republican’t in my
10:23, but I like it. A lot.
Used ta be a pasta free place in my neighborhood- but they closed- couldn’t make any money.
looseheadprop @123
Anyway… THANK You… you saved me lots of time digging for that info.
It was a hard decision….
First Amendment – Bill Moyers video
or
Impeachment of Cheney(Article 1, Section 3)
Or
Oversight duties of Congress….
What to discuss as part of a 30 minute little segment!
rwcole @ 129
who would it be for Rove, expert machinator?
I wish we could try to guess who the dcmadam economist is? Does anyone know of any likely candidates?
HotFlash @ 155
Think that peak oil has come and gone, and they know it, hence the mad scramble for non-petroleum energy resources like natural gas by the Russians, and the moves China has made to buy up smaller, peripheral energy interests while restraining its own growth.
Which suggests that the rationale for the squeeze on gasoline is two-fold: 1) profit taking is at its optimum as supplies decline, and 2) innoculating the public against increasing shortages is best done over a long slow period particularly if leadership does not want a political revolution on its hands.
STTP in Ohio @ 154
I just saw that the other night. You’re right, so I, too, am begging you to see “The Smartest Guys In The Room” re:Enron.
rwcole @ 158
They don’t need to if you can harvest the profits downstream from them.
Is it wrong that I am waiting in eager anticipation for the release of some of those names?
OT, but too funny not to share:
Left Behind games tank, executives being purged: http://www.gamasutra.com/php-b…..tory=13718
Hugh- historically- the profits come upstream.
Bob Schacht @ 149
Wow. great! If ever impeachment was called for, it’s for this administration. We need a major Paul Tracy – NASCAR style smackdown!
I had been wanting to ask, why was Pelosi saying it was off the table? Just askin’ cuz I missed it. thx.
rwcole @
160
You had to invoke the Flying Spaghetti Monster!
Tithonia @ 167
No, it should be rather entertaining.
ccmask @ 163
You can discount Wolfowitz. His Ph.D is in political science.
Tithonia @ 167
nope, it’s perfectly normal to enjoy the high and the mighty getting pantsed
ccmask @ 163
The economist, whoever he is, can claim he was doing research on the elasticity of demand for erotic fantasy services. Could lead to a Nobel, you never know.
Rayne @ 164
Ayuh, that’s the way to boil a frog.
ccmask @ 163
Friedman?
ccmask @ 163
economist…economics…mba…could it be the Decider?
Brisingamen @ 177
Krugman?
do-si-do @ 170
I think that Pelosi thought it was better to release some of the stink so that the American people themselves started asking for it instead of the Dems, who would suffer for it in 2008.
Criminy, has anyone seen the letter Bob Kengle sent to TPM? Kengle was an attorney with the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division who quit because he couldn’t handle working there anymore.
Here’s a taste of his reason for quittng:
[snip]
DC Madame:
It’ll be on ABC World News Tonight and definitely on 20/20 Friday. Brian Ross has all the documents, several thousand names, he said…admin officials, lawyers, the works…I can’t wait.
Brisingamen @ 177
If (Milton) Friedman can do it from the grave (died in 2006), he deserves a SECOND Nobel.
JF @ 179
I actually went to the Krugman wiki page and was wondering that one…
Whitehouse Council of Economic Advisors Note to Rayne, this is an official Whitehouse .gov site.
Well, lunchtime is just about over. Catch you guys on the flip-flop.
Rayne, I think we are at near peak oil. My own guess is around 2012 although we may not know until a year or two after it happens. Given that we are so near the peak, the price of oil is actually extremely undervalued. If you have a highly prized commodity and the supply is about to decline, the price should skyrocket. This hasn’t happened yet but probably will. The price manipulation we are seeing now is not in that category. This is the kind of thievery you would expect from oil executives padding their bottomline and retirement packages. It’s massive but will be dwarfed by the squeeze between peaked oil and the push for continued global economic growth.
ccmask @ 163
would Greenspan qualify?
Elliott @ 188
I hope not. His wife seems nice.
Elliott @ 188
ewwww. just ewwwww.
Light bulb! Murtha plumping for impeachment, nice one! Ms Pelosi, you are a strategic genius. I’m happy to have impeachment, and I don’t care if it’s on the table or under it.
Badwater @ 189
I believe she’s a reporter, isn’t she? Heckuva a job she does.
rwcole @ 158
I appreciate the response, but I really doubt the “don’t make money” part. At $60/barrel everybody is making cash.
In addition, my point is besides saving consumers money it’s a national security issue.
They could also be used as the oil shale is extracted from the fields in Utah, Colorado & Wyoming.
HotFlash @ 191
Agreed! And I don’t care either if it’s under the table or on top.
Elliott @ 192
Andrea Mitchell
[Mod Note; beware the burgeoning ziggurat]
This site is literally throbbing with schadenfreude today.
In seriousness, ABC has a huge problem in journalistic ethics on their hands, and I am curious to see how they handle it. Their must have 200 lawyers on it right now, with 400 opinions among them.
The first question I would ask MY lawyer is, who owns the list? From that, everything flows.
Elliott @
192
You mean Roseanne Rosannadanna?
ccmask @ 163
John Snow?
To me, the most (only?) interesting feature of the “dcmadam” thing is that the madam herself released these names to ABC in order to drum up “witnesses” to support her claim that her agency wasn’t selling sex, when of course it was. Her legal strategy relies on the assumption that every one of her former clients will lie, just as Tobias is lying. Things have gotten so bad in Washington that not only is her strategy sound, but it doesn’t even seem particularly cynical.
ccmask @
180
So, looseheadprop, when do we get to “prime the pump” again?
Bob in HI
rwcole @ 169
That’s true but I think what we are seeing is a more wholistic approach to gaming the system. It was probably what happened last year and the case for it happening this year is even stronger. The flow of energy can be attacked at several points that will cause distortions in the flow. It’s the distortion that creates the opportunities for short term gains.
Biodun @ 182
DC sex scandal, oooh. Just in time for summer.
Not that there’s an occupation going on or anything.
STTP in Ohio @ 193
I read somewhere that everything over $55/bbl is pure profit for Venezuela/Hugo Chavez. He’s gotta be loving this.
ccmask @
82
Heh heh – looks to me like Wolfowitz may have a defense lawyer playing hardball with him for an overdue retainer balance and or bribe fund.
Jeez. My mom called last night and didnt’ mention that fire over in Chemical Valley. It’s been quite some time that something like that’s happened that i can remember.
UH-OH….
Baghdad – The powerful Iraqi cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr called President George W. Bush the “anti-Christ” on Saturday and urged him to heed calls by the opposition Democrats to withdraw from the chaos of Iraq.
Calling Bush “the greatest evil”, Sadr said in a letter read out by a Sadrist MP in parliament that an eventual US pullout would be a “victory for the Iraqi people”.
“Here are the Democrats demanding that you withdraw at least with a timetable and you are stubborn against them,” said Sadr, whose Mehdi Army militia fought two uprisings against US forces in 2004.
“You are like the one-eyed anti-Christ. You look with one eye and refuse to look with the other,” he told Bush.
AFRICA 24 NEWS:
speaking of Snow, Tony’s up on CSPAN 1
STTP
The issue is was discussing was not whether the oil companies are making money at $60 a barrel (they’re makin a killing) but rather whether refineries are making money. My information is rather old- but at that time an independant refinery was not a road to riches.
Of course the major oil companies who are vertically integrated can decide where to show the profits- and they normally chose the well-head. They have always HATED retailing- but there are more profits being made there too.
Elliott @ 194
Oh for fucks sake, the republic party impeached a president over a blow job. How could it not be on the table with this criminal cabal currently occupying the white house.
dreamcatcher @ 196
IIRC, the DC Madam gave the list to ABC several weeks ago. There was a hullabaloo over her handing them the “little black book.”
From ABCNews:
Hugh-
Agree completely that the system is being gamed- system gaming seems to be the new niche for newly minted MBAs.
LJ/Aquaria @ 203
and the Iranians, too
Hugh @ 201
And screwing up any cause and effect relationship. It’s not just that we get tired and just pay, we are exhausted and powerless because things just don’t make sense. It’s much easier to manipulate a process that is not understood.
ccmask @ 180
so it was really a matter of mood and timing? that makes sense. thx.
HotFlash @ 197
Is she the one that takes her own public opinion polls?
ccmask @ 206
That’s a bit strident, but it’s easy to see why he might have that opinion.
ccmask @ 206
I’ve been calling him the anti-Christ for years, but the one-eyed is a nice touch.
“The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.” Frank Zappa
“One eyed anti-christ”
Here we go- the war of scriptures is about ta commence– OK Clusterfuck- YOUR turn!!
ccmask @ 206
Uh-Oh, indeed! I have to agree with him, though, Bush is the cocky one-eyed antichrist
Senate hearing on Hallibur$on coming up on CSPAN 1
“look with one eye and refuse to look with the other”
Sounds kinda profound- but I have no idea what the guy is saying!!
rwcole @ 220
I’m sure Bush’s writers are working full time to come up with a real zinger reply for him.
STTP in Ohio, I don’t think oil shale extraction will ever be practical. It takes a lot of water and energy to produce. It heavily damages the environment. The oil content is low and needs extensive reprocessing to be usable. For me, it is even more of a fantasy fuel than ethanol.
rwcole @ 220
W: “I know you are, but what am I?”
Well I saw the thing comin’ out of the sky
It had the one long horn, one big eye.
I commenced to shakin’ and I said “ooh-eee”
It looks like a purple people eater to me.
It was a one-eyed, one-horned, flyin’ purple people eater.
one-eyed, one-horned, flyin’ purple people eater
A one-eyed one-horned, flyin’ puple people eater
Sure looks stange to me.
Well he came down to earth and lit in a tree
I said Mr. Purple People Eater don’t eat me
I heard him say in a voice so gruff
I wouldn’t eat you cuz you’re so tough
It was a one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
Sure looks strange to me.
I said Mr. Purple People Eater, what’s your line
He said it’s eatin’ purple people and it sure is fine
But that’s not the reason that I came to land
I wanna get a job in a rock and roll band
Well bless my soul, rock and roll, flying purple
people eater. Pidgeon-toed, undergrowed, flyin’
purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned, flyin’ purple people eater
what a sight to see.
And then he swung from the tree and he lit on the
ground. He started to rock, really rockin’ around
It was a crazy ditty with a swingin’ tune
sing aboop boop aboopa lopa lum bam boom
It was a one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
What a sight to see
And then he went on his way, and then what do
you know. I saw him last night on a TV show.
He was blowing it out, a’really knockin’ em dead
Playin’ rock and roll music through the horn in
his head (clarinet solo) ( Tequila)
It was a one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
one-eyed, one-horned flyin’ purple people eater
Sure looks strange to me.
Brisingamen @ 210
Ah so! But possession does not equate to ownership. As an editor, someone can give me a manuscript, but I do not own it thereby.
How did Palfrey transfer ownership to ABC? My sneaking hunch is that she still owns it, unless she assigned rights to distribute same to ABC. If so, what ABC does with it has to be constrained by that fact. No?
I do remember reading that Ms. Palfrey studied law and completed a paralegal course, so she is no dummy in this area.
rwcole @ 223
I thought he was refering to a wandering eye
Hugh @ 225
Aren’t they doing it now in Canada?
LJ/Aquaria @ 203
The US oil companies are not just making profits. They are making record profits, year after year. Mission Accomplished!
HotFlash @ 218
As in “one-eyed snake” (As Good As It Gets)
Badwater @ 224
But the zinger will be aimed at Democrats, of course. Sigh.
senate hearing on halliburton and it’s dealings in IRAN is coming up on cspan1.
Elliott @ 229
Bush does sort of resemble a Cyclops. sp?)
Speaking of Hugo, our local CITGO station was down for a couple of days last week because they had gas priced .10-.20 lower than anybody else (I think the price was 2.59 there; across the street it was 2.69. They got drained in about two days, and they have something like 18 pumps.
Nice people at the station. I went inside one day to get a few things, couldn’t find one I wanted, and the first-generation immigrant who owns the store got after the apathetic clerk with a most insistent, “Don’t just tell her we don’t have! Find it for nice lady!”
And then he gave me a discount for taking an alternate product when he didn’t have the one I wanted after all. Wasn’t that the sweetest?
I think he may be Venezuelan. He was wearing a Viva Hugo Chavez T-shirt.
I think “look with one eye and refuse to look with the other” is an oblique reference to hypocrisy, like our own “white man speaks with forked-tongue.”
LS @ 227
When I was little, since I knew there were colored people, it made sense to me that a one-eyed one-horned flying monster would prefer purple people to eat. But I was never sure if the monster was flying or the purple people.
I thought the monster was purple.
“And then the second seal was broken and the world was flooded with purple people eaters.”
Dreamcatcher at #228, I find myself wondering what the DC Madam was hoping to accomplish by releasing this info?
If most of her clients are/were Republicans it will certainly do little for their reputations. In light of their impeachment of Clinton, it could be pretty amusing.
Could it be that she thought this would force those with the power to do so to quash the prosecution?
Halliburton hearing live on CSpan 1.
Badwater @ 224
Possibilities from the Bush team:
Nyah, nyah, nyah
Sticks and stones . . .
Slips off me and sticks to you
Mommy!
BTW what’s Sadr doing talking about the anti-Christ? It’s not a particularly Moslem concept, is it?
rwcole @ 239
Me too, except the lyrics say,
“He said it’s eatin’ purple people and it sure is fine”
rwcole @ 239
Oh, it was, but I was really little and, since there were colored people, I assumed the monster liked to eat the purple ones.
Elliott @ 230
Oil sands are one big reason why our water is being targeted. Maude Barlow here.
More info here and here.
rwcole @ 240
LOL
Anyone else agree that the Iraq exit strategy is for Bush/Cheney to move to Halliburton’s new digs in the middle east after they’ve flushed democracy down the toilet?
new thread.
Brisingamen @ 241
yes
Elliott @ 230
Those are oil sands and again it takes a lot of water to produce them and has a major impact on the environment.
Hugh @ 187
I’m no expert, but a case can be made that there is plenty of oil available.
This is not to say we shouldn’t do all we can to conserve energy; of course we should! It is to say that yelling “peak oil” is probably a way to keep pushing prices higher.
Oil sand and oil shale are a bit diffferent.
There is much oil in north america that can be produced- but only at a high price. On the other hand- if it takes more energy to produce than you get from the production- then yer fucked- it will never be economical to produce whatever the price.
dreamcatcher @ 237
And the evil eye, a big deal in the ME. My (Christian) Palestinian corner store guys have a nazar anti-evil-eye amulet in their window (inconspicuously, and they seemed embarassed when I asked about it).
Elliott @ 250
And shake loose some donations. The IRS has seized all her assets.
mc @ 226
W: “I’m rubber. You’re glue….”
Brisingamen @ 241
She kinda missed the market on this one–in Spring 2006 the Bush administration was quashing prosecutions right and left. Now, not so much.
STTP in Ohio @ 252
And I have a completely different reaction when thinking about “peak oil”; I believe that our biggest problems with oil are the kinds of damage that a petroleum-based economy produces, and the national security issues that come of petroleum consumption. Peak oil as a concept provides impetus to stop using the stuff. I’d rather the price did increase to encourage us to stop using it, which in turn causes price collapse.
STTP in Ohio @ 252
People who don’t believe in peak oil are often called cornucopians and there are plenty of them out there. The problem is that they have to go further and further afield to come up with new oil: deeper offshore drilling, drilling in more marginal areas, reworking old fields with new methods, oil sands, oil shale, oil from coal and so called renewables like ethanol. Most of these take significant inputs of money, energy, and water, and destroy the environment. Even so they still don’t come up to what we are currently getting from oil. So at some point in the not too distant future easy oil will peak and the harder to get oil will not make up the difference. That is when things are going to hit the fan. We should be taking steps now to address this, and, of course, none of this gets to the relationship between fossil fuels and global climate change.
uh oh.
blair is britains gonzales
doan is gsa’s gonzales
tenet is cia’s gonzales
sherry williams is halliburton’s gonzales
gonzalez is the 43’s gonzales
43 is OUR gonzales!
uh oh.
I think the madam was told that her 46 pounds of phone records were going to be seized after she said she was going to sell them to help pay for her attorney. Right before that happened, she gave them to ABC and it was too late to seize them!
SEIZE THE CACHE!
Hugh@259
Just because I question the timing of peak oil doesn’t mean I’m against conservation. You make several good points regarding the difficulty of getting at most of the remaining oil.
I’m all for alternative fuel sources, higher mpg requirements, etc. I’m just having a problem with the BS that is happening in the name of “tight supplies” when our immediate problem is lack of refining capacity, not oil availability.
Nonetheless, I’ve enjoyed the discussion. Hope we can continue it another time. And, if you have a moment, please read the link I placed @252 and share your thoughts.
Interesting. So, without noting what, precisely, those 213 roll call votes — resulting in 176 passed measures — were, we simply arrive at the conclusion that the new, Democrat-controlled congress is actually doing something worthwhile? What “money’s worth” are we getting?
What’s the bill for these 176 passed measures, since Bush seldom vetoes anything? After all, who pays for all of these “measures”? The government doesn’t simply print new money — it comes out of our pockets!
Folks, if our Congress actually comported itself within the bounds of the Constitution, it would only be in session for about four weeks out of every year. However, since at least two of the branches of government decided that nothing is outside the Congress’s realm, it stands to reason that their power requires them to meet all year.
To paraphrase Alexis de Tocqueville: The American Republic will endure only until our representatives realize they can bribe us with our own money. Interesting how long they’ve been doing just that, with none of us the wiser.