
Everyone has their favorite moment from the Bill Moyers documentary last night, this was mine:
BILL MOYERS: Critics point to September eight, 2002 and to your show in particular, as the classic case of how the press and the government became inseparable.
Someone in the administration plants a dramatic story in the NEW YORK TIMES And then the Vice President comes on your show and points to the NEW YORK TIMES. It's a circular, self-confirming leak.
TIM RUSSERT: I don't know how Judith Miller and Michael Gordon reported that story, who their sources were. It was a front-page story of the NEW YORK TIMES. When Secretary Rice and Vice President Cheney and others came up that Sunday morning on all the Sunday shows, they did exactly that.
TIM RUSSERT: What my concern was, is that there were concerns expressed by other government officials. And to this day, I wish my phone had rung, or I had access to them.
BILL MOYERS: Bob Simon didn't wait for the phone to ring.
BILL MOYERS: When you said a moment ago when we started talking to people who knew about aluminum tubes. What people-who were you talking to?
BOB SIMON: We were talking to people - to scientists - to scientists and to researchers and to people who had been investigating Iraq from the start.
BILL MOYERS: Would these people have been available to any reporter who called or were they exclusive sources for 60 minutes?
BOB SIMON: No, I think that many of them would have been available to any reporter who called.
After sitting in the Libby trial with jaw-dropping incredulity as Russert admitted he'd spilled his guts to the FBI when they first contacted him and then later refused to testify claiming he was protecting his source, and then listening to him say that all conversations were off the record unless otherwise specified, I thought we'd reached some sort of nadir in terms of Russert's flat-out ignorance of basic journalistic principles. I was wrong.
What kind of a journalist sits around and waits for people to call him? Well, journalists don't do that, but then again he's the guy Cathie Martin said could be counted upon to let the OVP "control message." I think "political operative," "shill" and "wanker" are all probably more apt.
It's astonishing that he's still allowed to host perhaps the most influential of all the Sunday morning political talk shows, and yet, he is.
If you haven't seen the documentary you can watch it here. As Glenn Greenwald says, there aren't a whole lot of revelations in it, but to watch it all unfold chronologically in context is quite sobering. The story of how the administration's case for war was bogus was there -- the Knight Ridder reporters didn't have trouble uncovering it -- and yet our media elites continue to shrug their shoulders and say "how were we supposed to know?"
Eric Boehlert was great, and even though I thought the question that Moyers was asking Peter Beinert was kind of jive Beinart still managed to make an ass of himself. If you haven't seen it, it's highly, highly recommended.
Update: John Casper points us to this rather astonishing moment in Chris Cillizza's recent ComPost chat:
New York: The Fourth Estate check/balance function Halberstam and the best journalists of his generation fulfilled are exactly those that have been so fundamentally abandoned, repudiated and scorned by our nation’s most prominent and influential media stars. Why do you think the Halberstams of yesteryear appear to have morphed into the “off-the-record” Russerts of today?
Chris Cillizza: I disagree with the premise. While there is no question that David Halberstam’s work was groundbreaking and is credited by many with creating a sense that the White House wasn’t shooting straight with the American people, I think modern journalists are doing their very best to emulate that sort of reporting.
And, frankly, Tim Russert is one of the best examples (I believe) of that kind of accountability journalism. I can’t count the number of politicians I have watched squirm and sweat when Russet uttered the words “Let me put something up on the screen for you and our viewers.”
Tim Russert is like David Halberstram? I have to say, this is one of the more remarkable analogies I've ever heard. Can you say "audition?" I thought you could.
Update 2: Digby wonders why "they" didn't call Timmeh, either. Just not very hard.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Zed!
Jane!
The most annoying part of the program, for me, were the backpedaling media figures like Timmeh who tried to claim they HAD been skeptical of the Bush Administration, no, really they had! Grr…
Shorter Timmeh: “It’s the Democrats fault for being a minority.”
Jon Stewart’s going to be on Bill Moyers’ show tomorrow night. Must-see TV!
Me First?
Phoenix Woman @ 4
I hope he brings up Gannon.
Maybe Russert’s phone has no “send” button, to keep him from running up the phone bills.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com.....raise.html Clinton’s Guest Blogging Venue Raises Some Eyebrows
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) first guest blog posting (that is, on a blog other than her own) is raising a few eyebrows in Democratic political circles.
Jane did you see this?
Lou Costello @
4
Yeah that bit was quite mystifying.
Hi Jane and Pups! Timmeh is totally shameless.
Ding ding ding ding!!! Jane, that was definitely the most irritating moment for me–the dog got scared I screeched at the screen so loud. What a complete lazy ass whiner.
Timmeh, WTF is wrong with this statement?
Do your F*CKIN’JOB, you IdioTool.
lolo @
9
A less controversial venue!! Bah Humbug
Froomkin’s lede today is on the benchmarks laid out by Bush for the surge in Iraq, the failure of anyone to have met the benchmarks thus far, and the inexplicable silence in the Washington Press Corps with regard to these failures.
As Moyers said, Russert is not alone — he just gives a great (negative) example of what passes for journalism in much of DC.
As soon as I saw the Russert segment, I was immediately reminded of Milquetoast Matt Cooper’s appearance on Monday’s The Daily Show.
Anybody else see the similarities ?
snowbird42 @
14
You just know the Clinton campaign staff is high-fiving each other over this — “Yeah, edgy, risk-taking Hillary! Keep talking about it!”
“What kind of journalist waits for ..calls?”
The kind that uses gop talking points faxed on a regular basis as demonstated in lazy assgooper journal101 taught exclusively at the
Jack Welch School of Corporate Fawning
The thing that gave me the complete creeps about Moyers’ show was that it brought back that whole feeling of great unease we both felt during that time. We KNEW we were being spun. We KNEW we were being lied to. But there was no way to get info at that time other than the BBC or other foreign news sources. We basically turned off the TV and radio for months, which about killed me. Then, I discovered blogs. Crisis averted.
Are others able to see the program through the PBS link? It won’t do anything for me — and I do have Windows Media 9. Just goes nowhere.
I hope it appears somewhere in Real Player or something.
Thanks Jane.
It reminded of some crap I read from the Compost’s Chris Cillizza in a chat on Tuesday:
Why would Tim Russert bother to pick up the phone and reach out to a source. After all, he’s TIM RUSSERT, celebrity. He doesn’t go to people, they come to him. Pumkin Head has blood on his hands for being the compliant and lazy spokesmodel that he is. America will be a better country when Tim is sent packing. Cheney’s bitch indeed.
I have not watched the Moyers special yet, I will.
One of the most telling Russert (weasel moments) was several months ago, when Cheney was on Meet the Press again and again. Cheney was going on and on about Iran’s nuclear weapons program (the unchallenged and unproven claims being endlessly repeated by the “cakewalk in Iraq” liars). When Cheney was done with his unsubstantiated claims. Russert did not simply ask “where is the hard evidence to back up your claims” Russert asked Cheney “how can we stop them”.
Russert has obviously learned nothing from the disastrous job that he and his cronies did in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq!
Russert is a prime example of why I no longer watch any of those larger than life talking brains on Sunday morning. Who needs it.
Moyers, and the progressive bloggers aka thinkers, giving the much-deserved smackdown to the stale POPs [political operative press] of Washington.
Great post, Jane! Your commentary on Russert, Begala on gasbag
Broder/RoverBrover, Josh on Andrea “I’ve never met a fact I couldn’t manipulate to make the Repukes look less pathetic” Mitchell.The founding fathers thought the free press was so important they gave it first place. Too bad the MSM in the beltway think it’s last… or least?
MSM, we’re lookin’ at you. Yeah, you. And we shall overcome.
Only slightly OT, but speaking of irresponsible members of the NBC media team, did you catch the latest Andrea Mitchell, “I’ll just make up a poll and then broadcast my fabrication?” Josh Marshall caught her today saying that polls show that Nancy Pelosi is just as unpopular as Denny Hastert was right before the 2006 election. The reality is that Denny was at 22% favorable and Nancy is at 44% favorable. Mrs. Greenspan strikes again.
Now I get it. I could have been a great reporter but my phone didn’t ring.
Oh, the humanity!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 24
I would rather pull up a chair with Chrisy or sleep in.
lolo @ 9
Linky no work……try this: http://blog.washingtonpost.com.....raise.html
Oklahoma kiddo @ 24
I’ve got better things to do on Sunday morning.
;)
Tim @ 16
yes.
Unfortunately, Pumpkinhead remains a figure of great reverence among the upcoming journo class, like Peter Baker at the WaPo:
I don’t remember the “sitting and waiting for a call” part of All the President’s Men. If young journos admire the Russert way (passively awaiting calls, everything off the record when speaking to a newsmaker, no followup questions, ever) then newspapers are truly a dying breed.
There will only be The Daily Show, Colbert, and the bloggers.
lolo @
9
Well, let’s see which is worse:
A controversial graphic online for one hour, removed, followed by an immediate acknowledgment of responsibility
OR
Managing Editor Bob Woodward covering up from his editor in the Scooter Libby case to preserve his elite insider access, which he used to cheerlead the war. http://www.firedoglake.com/200.....dward-one/
Feel free to post your own WaPo outrage. Anything from Fred Hiatt (who’s so bad that one of his own columnists, Colbert King reamed him out — though not explicitly by name, alas — in his farewell column last week), or maybe some excerpts from Bill Moyers’ report last night?
Y’know, it’s really not poor Timmy Potato’s fault. When he was taking that “learn journalism at home” correspondence course, he accidentally opened up the wrong textbook — and instead of reading a chapter on how good journalists question what they’re told and seek out the truth, he read about how baby birds blindly open their beaks and wait for someone to drop in some regurgitated worms.
And to this day, he’s never realized his mistake.
TeddySanFran @ 32
And that will be a good thing. I look forward to it.
Tim Russert has zero credibility … case in point
Russert’s role in the 2000 election
That doesn’t even count Timmeh’s famous interview of the Shrub with all the soft lighting back in 04, where he basically asked such hard hitting questions as “What’s your favorite color? What’s your favorite number? Are you a dog person or a cat person?”
Freakin’ jocksniffer!!!
TeddySanFran @ 32
and KO.
yes, KO rulez
Digby pulls both triggers on this very subject.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/
iirc, ADM (Archer Daniels Midland) is a major sponsor of Meet The Press. Wonder what they have to say about sponsoring streaming lies?
OT, working on a very exhaustive biography on A. Hitler and came across something quite relavent as to how the Nazi’s “managed”. Often times direct orders were not given but underlings knew what the higher ups expected of them and they then did what was necessary to promote the Party’s interests. Not unlike Roves politicalization efforts. The underlings don’t have to be told what to do. They know what is expected.
Complete non sequitur…
I was listening to KCRW online and just heard a song that sent chills up my spine: 16 Words, by Margo Guryan. You might be able to guess which 16 words… (Hints: uranium, Iraq)
Check it out on YouTube.
Timmeh your phone is ringing…
Madness, Madness, Madness
If those two Knight/Ridder/McClatchy guys ever get some traction, there’s your new Woodward/Bernstein (1970’s version) dynamic.
Readers of the WaPo blog citing Hillary’s “controversial” appearance should note that it appears that the blogger (Mary Ann Akers) took a phone call from Dan Gerstein, but appears not to have lifted a phone to call Jane. Just showing that she, too, appears to be aspiring to the standards already established.
I thought the most telling part of Moyer’s piece was when Walter Pincus admitted that the “journalists” stopped fact-checking Raygun in the early eighties - because they were getting complaints about being “mean” to him!
Oklahoma kiddo @ 24
Yes, and this is a good opportunity to thank the posters here who do watch the Talking Heads and then report for the rest of us. In fact, kudos to all who do the heavy lifting here so that others can just basically lurk — like me — and yet still be well informed.
TeddySanFran @
38
Hey TSF, did you see McCain on TDS?
Bluetoe#41, you’re exactly right.It’s very difficult to see the difference between a pre-arranged conspiracy versus like-minded individuals acting in concert.
This IS why the MSM rolled over for war:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/.....ckquot-98/
*Cartoons say the darndest things.
Given the adulation both Cillizza and Baker ladled onto Timmeh during their WaPoO chatz this week, I presume they knew what Moyers had locked and loaded. Were NBC a newsgathering and reporting entity, Moyers’ reporting, coming on top of the Cathie Martin testimony, would end Timmeh’s career.
Clearly Tim put the word out that his knob would need polishing — watch the Beltway Boyzengrlls make it shine this week.
And Andrea Mitchell? She’s just drunk, alla time.
Bustednuckles @
39
Yep, we talked after the show. Sent us both into orbit.
Does anyone have a transcript of the Mar 6 2003 press conf Moyers opens the show with? This turkey from CBS is claiming that
It would be really nice to really look at what questions and what follow-up there were.
Russert didn’t just not call anybody, he didn’t bother to read anything other than what was sent to him by Rove. All that information was available. I’m sure a lot of Firedog readers were those people who actually combed through the internet and other sources to find the truth. I live in freakin’ Montana and I knew Rove’s propoganda was a bunch of lies and I knew why! Hell I’ve got a full time job, 2 kids, and I still knew what was going on. Isn’t Pumpkin Head’s JOB to know facts? Really, how do any of these Dickheads keep their jobs? If I was wrong EVERY fucking day on my job, my ass’d be out on the street. There is simply no accountability.
I’ve emailed and phoned NBC countless times complaining about Russert’s bias and journalistic laziness. I suppose if enough people do it, targeting advertisers as well, perhaps Russert can be sent into retirement.
Did you catch the contrast to KO’s ending comment last night and Scarborough’s beginning with Rosie…
From the important to the trivial…
Jack
I saw the show last night, too. Bill Moyers is a public treasure.
Timmeh is not a journalist. He’s a Media Personality Talk Show Host. That’s his job.
Maybe its too much to expect him to be a journalist, too, but at least he ought to have someone at the top level of his staff, that he talks with every day, whose main responsibility is as an investigative Journalist. He ought to be relying on that person to coach him before every MTP with Questions To Ask. He ought to be thinking of MTP as being more like 60 Minutes, and less like Bowling for Dollars.
Bob in HI
martha @
19
I have lived and traveled in the Middle East (I even went to Iraq as a tourist once!). And I knew that there was (as Simon pointed out) that there was NO WAY in hell that Saddam would ever have anything to do with Al Qaeda or any other Islamic fundamentalist group.
One just has to know a tiny bit of history of the emnity between the Ba’athists and the Islamic brotherhood. The current Syrian President Assad’s father launched a wholesale slaughter of Islamicists in the 80s. There have been similar well-documented purges in Iraq.
What really pissed me off is that none of the Dems in Congress seemed to have a clue about any of this. I’m sure that there were plenty of careerists at State and the CIA who could’ve educated them on this point if someone had bothered to inquire.
It is also worth noting that both Syria and Iran made overtures to “help” the US in 2001, after 9-11. Classic Middle Eastern the enemy of my enemy is my fried diplomacy…
Morris Sheppard @
27
Morris, ding!
Petrocelli @ 48
Yeah, what a kidder!! IED jokes are so funny! Jon Stewart fell outta love on the air that nite.
Hello Russert pick up your phone and provide the American people with balanced and accurate information. Or we will continue to go to the Internet to get our info. You could have had Un weapons inspector Scott Ritter or Un’’s IAEA El Baradei. Diane Rehms was one MSMer who provided a wide scope before the invasion! Russert and other MSM outlets had Cheney, Rice, Bush, Rumsfeld, Kristol, Wolfowitz on their programs endlessly parroting the same WMD horseshit.
You MSM folks should have been listening to her show before the invasion. You might have heard other opinions from an endless list of retired Military, Cia analyst, historians, and UN weapons inspectors!
The MSM provided the American people with tunnel vision straight down the neo-cons false intelligence stovepipe. Which lead to the pre-emptive and illegal invasion of Iraq and the unnecesary deaths and injuries of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people and American soldiers!
Russert is swimming in blood with the Bush administration!
OT - I’d like to see Saint McCain say this to Cindy and the other families that have lost somebody:
SSSSSHHHHHHH!
Digby has uncoverd the secret recipe for the infamous “Coctail Weenie” that has caused so much brain damage in our press.
As a special treat just for Hullabaloo readers, my spies on the ground were able to discover the secret appetizer recipe Hitchens served at that fabulous Vanity Fair soiree at his condo. Shhhh. Don’t share it with anybody who isn’t somebody:
Drunken Cocktail Weenies
Ingredients:
1 cup ketchup
1/2 cup chili sauce
3 cups bourbon
1/4 cup onion — finely chopped
1/2 cup sugar (or grape jelly)
1 teaspoon Louisiana Hot Sauce
1 pound “Li’l Polksas” or Cocktail Franks
Directions:
Combine all ingredients except franks and one cup bourbon in saucepan and heat on medium heat until almost boiling. Drink remaining bourbon. Lower heat; simmer uncovered 5 minutes. Add franks; simmer 8-10 minutes until heated through. Serve hot in chafing dish.
Mmm-mmm-mmm.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/
Sorry Jane, I couldn’t resist,/blogwh*ring.
Ugh - OT but Ugh. Replay of this morning’s CNN interview with Kyra and Michael Ware. First of all, is Kyra sleeping with Petraeus? And why is Michael Ware sounding so Kyra-like?
Does Russert have a photo scrap-book with pictures of most of the main players in DC engaged in indiscrete acts with farm animals or something?
It’s a groupthink truism that he is as tough as nails. Tough? For God’s sake Gwenn Ifill made him look like a rube just by staring him down about his Imus asshattery.
In reference to his stint on the Moyers piece.
As I said late last night, he was sweating like Flounder on pledge night.
-GSD
Based on their comments during the Libby trial, I think Dan Froomkin and the folks at Editor and Publisher might disagree with DanGer stein’s and Mary Ann Aker’s characterization of FDL and Jane.
Jane, I agree. The moment with Timmy was my No. 1, too.
and Timmy looks like a pumpkin, yes, but to me he looks like the overripe beefeater tomato he is.
Eureka Springs @
40
Oh, geez, they probably write the script.
Bob Schacht @ 57
But he is also NBC’s Washington Bureau Chief, whatever that means. It probably means his mindset dictates all NBC coverage of DeeCee.
Perhaps Russert might want to put up his phone number on a graphic next Sunday morning, so that he won’t miss so much in the future.
And it sure laid out the case against Mockingbird Safire, too.
TeddySanFran @
60
I loved McCain channeling Rumsfeld in that flurry of asking/answering his own questions. Coming after the Bush V Bush debate, it was especially comical and showed how far McCain has gone … out of his mind.
Mae @ 65
3-way pillow talk?
Lou Costello @ 29
The “sleuth” is obviously an idiot comparing Jane Hamsher to Jeff Gannon..silly!
TiredFed @ 74
TiredFed - you crack me up!
Prairie Sunshine @ 25
Nit: No they didnt. The first congress approved 12 amendments to the constitution. The first two didnt pass. (OK, well one of the two did pass some 200 years later.) The remaining ten became the Bill of Rights. But the First Amendment was proposed as the third.
lolo @
28
I can usually find a movie somewhere on the cable box that’s better than trying to stomach Timmeh.
McCain has bombs on his brain. Last week it was his ghoulish quips about bombing Iran. This week it is even more ghoulsh quips about IED’s killing American’s who aren’t in the rightwing tank of warmongers.
The man is disturbed. He’ll be launching missiles from the inaugural podium.
-GSD
Russert is no more a journalist than Cheney is a saint or GWB a Rhodes Scholar. He’s a fricken’ Talk Show Host!!
Yeah, I was struck by that moment, too. Ms. Redshift happened to be out of the room at that point, and when she came back and asked what she’d missed, I said “Tim Russert is showing what a tool he is again.”
My other most appalling bit was this:
Yeah, Peter, you and your pals had no control over what the argument was about, it just happened, right? Another tool.
Bustednuckles @ 64
2 cups bourbon for the cook that explains it
Russert needs to be replaced, for MTP’s sake, or MTP should be gone.
Time to go, Tim, go write that book Colbert alluded to @ last yrs. WH Correspondents Dinner…
Pickled weenies for the press!
GR fan @ 78
oooh. a history buff. got any nits about impeachment, like why don’t we use it more often and what the FFs put it in the Constitution for? my sense is impeachment = You’re fired! Just a way to clean house once in a while. I’m sure Madison or Hamilton had a few choice words to say.
GSD @
79
I was on Late nite last night, hoping you and TSF would be there satirizing McCain, but it was not to be … or did I leave too soon?
“Tim Russert is like David Halberstram?”
He may very well be, Jane.
From Warren Hinckle’s “If You Have a Lemon, Make Lemonade: An Essential Memoir of a Lunatic Decade” (NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1974), pp.162-163…
“What critical reporting there was about Vietnam dealt with questions of the efficiency or practicality of the means of American policy but did not question its ends. It is a measure of the level of press criticism of America’s great Vietnam misadventure that David Halberstam was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1964 for calling Madame Nhu a bitch. Halberstam, long the war’s most celebrated critic, chastised the corrupt Nhu family and poked the wind machines of the General’s public relations machinery while still accepting the basic ideological tenets of American policy. In an Esquire interview in 1964 Halberstam worried that ‘this pretty little country will be lost.’ In his earlier book, The Making of a Quagmire, said Halberstam the war critic: ‘The lesson to be learned from Vietnam is that we must get in earlier, be shrewder and force the other side to practice the self-deception.’
I would not nitpick Halberstam were it not for his recent and nauseating criticisms of those liberal Establishment types who made America’s Vietnam policy – that they were the victims of some weepy, ill-defined hubris that kept them from seeing the fatal flaw in the whole undertaking – that the formulates in his trendy best seller, The Best and the Brightest, which must rank as one of the great bullshit books of all time. Halberstam adroitly skips over the fact that the American press establishment had its own best and brightest in Vietnam (not the least of them Halberstam) during those years of folly – a decade of electronic, plugged-in and satellited reporting that exhibited the same arrogance or, if we must, hubris of the ideology of the men whom Halberstam now so artfully brushes with the vanishing cream of tragedy.”
Eureka Springs @
40
What lies? What Timmeh says is what ADM wants to have be the truth. Guarantee that they have no problems whatsoever with anything Timmeh does and they would have extreme heartburn with Moyers or Stewart or Colbert or Olberman. I.E., individuals who actually practice journalism, even if from a comedic perspective.
kathleen @ 84
Pickled weenies are the press!
Will Congress launch a hearing into the complicity of MSM in selling this war?
Peter Beinart reminded me of a South Park character, but I couldn’t figure out which one. Of course, Gwen Ifill doesn’t watch South Park:
(Jane, ygm.)
Petro,
It’s all a blur.
Life during Bush’s wartime.
-GSD
MayDaze @
46
Because he was a “nice old man” even if a bit senile and suffering early stage Alzheimers.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 24
I, like some other bloggers here (luv u) are going to church on Sunday ams., Sometimes tape them, depending on if I’m UP singing or preaching — and have the timne to set the tape, but.. the point being, we all do what we can — in context.
The old “Know What You’re Facing” agenda applies. So,… Timmeh falls somewhere between those who care to follow the story (guys at Knight-Ridder) and (well, I guess the Rest Of Them), ‘cuase he DID face theMoyers! I’m just saying…I know it sucks, but there is a difference.
There is! Preaching to the choir is easy. (no offense meant…but???)
My brain has recently been trying to wrap around the thought of HOW DO WE PREACH outside the bos?
I love being a part of the firedog community — it reminds me of Vonnegut’s Lonesome No More idea. And I enjoy being able to live-blog hearing results. And I love the link-driven information, but..
I’m not sure. How to speak to the other side?
(working in my garden today. it’s a great way to put my hands in the dirt AND listen to hearings/votes/etc.)
From Moyers special ~ While showing video like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPg7uv0JPEA
The only difference between the MSM and Jeff Gannon is the hourly rate!
TeddySanFran @ 60
I read that his response to complaints about that were that the complainers needed to get a life. Just as he responded to those who complained about his “bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran” shtick.
Oh My Effing Dog.
To even momentarily equate Russert with Halberstam is downright criminal.
Tell me again, why does Cillizza — or Russert for that matter — still have a job?
They should be wearing orange vests picking up litter on the highway.
So does Pumpkinhead’s marriage make him an Orth-odonist?
dakine01 @ 95
McCain To Murtha: ‘Lighten Up And Get A Life’
well, well, well…..Is the women who wrote about Hillary the same as this woman:
Mary Ann Akers, Pretty in Pink?
Thursday October 12th, 2006 4:47 PM by Big
Mary Ann Akers, that superb gossip over at Roll Call, recently got engaged to journalist Michael Isikoff, co-author of the new book Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq. So, of course, we had to ask her all about the wedding and if she would, in fact, be wearing white.
http://www.bigheadrob.com/2006.....y-in-pink/
I have to say, my favorite bit was Beinart’s defensive, squirming, subject-changing bullshit. You could actually see him withering under Moyers’ gaze.
As i watched the bloviating ponce, I kept clenching my fists to fight back the overwhelming urge to drive to DC, [Mod Note; Please, no suggestions of violence towards public figures.]
The bush regime wants total control of the news. When they cannot have that, they create confusion. They obfuscate, make things way more complex than they are. If things seem confusing enough,