
NOTE: I need to run and pick up The Peanut from preschool in a little while. I will pause the hearing on my DVR and resume when I get back. Just wanted to give everyone a heads up on this. Mr. ReddHedd is, unfortunately, stuck in a meeting and unless he gets out early, I'll have to go around 4:30 pm ET and will be back as quickly as I can.
SEN. CARDIN QUESTIONS: Asks about Goodling's role. AG says that he doesn't know about her role specifically, knows that she was involved in preparation of testimony after the fact. She was involved in communicating with the WH and other individuals. Don't want to minimize her role, but I wasn't primarily relying on her -- was relying primarily on Deputy AG. Cardin says that he has spoken with the AG about voter intimidation -- issues like long lines for voting, etc., and he mentions that because there seems to be a growing activity to cause problems for minority voters across the country in certain neighborhoods. You have indicated that voter fraud was a problem, and I didn't see any indication that there was emphasis on voter intimidation. AG says that he appreciates the right to vote -- having grown up in a poor neighborhood, the one day you knew you were equal was on election day. Stealing someone's vote is not right. Cardin recommends that the AG take a look at the Obama bill pending at the moment. Every eligible vote needs to count.
10 minute recess.
(jh taking over for chs)
WHITEHOUSE: Former USA Whitehouse is concerned that the DOJ be separate from the White House, and Abu concurs. He gives him letters that outline guidelines for contact between the White House and the DOJ in civil and criminal matters from Janet Reno, and also from the Bush Administration. Three people from the DOJ and four in the White House during the Clinton era could participate in these discussions, narrowing the portal for communications, an important safeguard to keep these discussions from becoming politicized. Under the Bush Administration there were 417 in the White House who could have 30 some from the DOJ.
Leahy says "I find the chart astounding."
Whitehouse wants to have a report from the Office of Inspector General on the matter. He wants to know why it was referred to OPR by Abu, since OPR never makes a public report and does not evaluate whether they subject themselves to political pressure and simply evaluates them as lawyers, but none of them were acting as lawyers in the matter.
Gonzales doesn't recall making a decision to refer it to OPR knowing that there would only be a private report to him.
SCHUMER: You've answered "I don't know" or "I don't recall" to close to 100 questions. Urges Gonzales for the good of the department and for the good of the country to step down.
Gonzales says the burden of proof is on those alleging something improper happened here.
Schumer: That would be true if this were a criminal trial, but we have a much higher standard for the Attorney General. And when you fire US attorneys, the burden is on you to explain why. The burden of proof lays with the person who took responsibility and did the firing.
SPECTER: Inevitably there is a loss of credibilty. He thinks Abu's answers are crap but says Gonzales is doing it in good faith. Also agrees that further questioning is not going to lead anywhere. "Overblown personnel matter" -- poor choice of words, can't be erased. Moral problem in the DOJ. Won't call for Gonzales to resign, leaves it to Abu and the President. (Ladies and Gentlemen, Profile in Courage, Arlen Specter.)
Specter does it every single time -- expresses "grave concern," sets himself up as the conscience of the Committee, the Republican who's going to cross party lines to act on principle -- then uses the authority to give everyone a pass. Lindsey Graham works the same side of the street. It's a cheap con artist trick, not the act of the great statesman Specter likes to think he is.
LEAHY: I cannot think of any time I have been more concerned for the system of criminal justice in this counry.
Adjourned.
(One heckler heard afterwards: "Seventy-four times, 'I don't recall.' How did he get through law school?")
Login Here
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
PAT and PAT!
resign, already!
first zed in weeks…
CHS,
McClatchy Article on Voter intimidation
So how many times did AbuG perjure himself? When I left for work this morning, it was up in the high twenties.
Somewhat hard to tell from the liveblogging, but I have not seen anything so far that sinks Gonzales. Finishes off his reputation with the Democratic Senate and the netroots, yes - but that reputation was already just about as low as it could go. Unless there is a smoking gun of perjury in one of the e-mails the committee already has I foresee Gonzales staying as USAG through the end of this Administration.
Please convince me I am wrong.
Cranky
Someone asked below about OPR and why they didn’t follow up on the NSA letters.
OPR was told to stay out of it.
Ooohh… during the 10-minute break, C-Span’s replaying the earlier face-off with Specter when Gonzo made his snide remark about preparing for ALL his presentations, and Specter ripped into him. Somebody please post that one to YouTube!
want to ask this question again of those in the know. A professor from Mt. Holyoke was on Pacifica today discussing the hearing. He mentioned that one of the issues not brought up was the Republican Prosecutor who was let go of in Guam (that this guy was investigating or had investigated Abramoff’s connections there). He also indicated that Bush had initiated this process.
Would it be in line to bring this up in this hearing?
He’s gone. Too many R’s kicking him and this is just the Senate.
edit: *just* the Senate.
is this live or re-play?
Texas Betsy @ 11
Replay, they are on a ten minute break.
Cranky Observer @
6
Hope he stays for a while because Repubs will try to convince everyone that when he goes there is nothing else to pursue, and Rove will once again have escaped.
EPU’d from last thread:
Re Gonzo’s preparation: He has been treading on thin ice perjury-wise all day. All they could do was drill the Libby defense into him. So they fired every possible question they could conceive of at him, over the last two weeks, and made him practice various permutations of “I don’t recall.”
I swear that he looked like he was going to break into tears due to the pressure several times today–esp when the rethugs were hammering away at him.
My guess is that the White House let him know several weeks ago that it would be all right by them if he resigned…but would “leave it up to him” to make the final decision (Perino saying he had the opportunity to go to the Hill and “fix it” with the Senate) Bush is loyal to his little bro in that way. Or sadistic.
Ed*ard Teller @ 5
When I left at lunch, I had counted 6o.
GOP Sen Coburn: “Best Way To Put This Behind Us Is Your Resignation”
Top of the page at Huffpo. Prolly the evening news too etc
Bloody in Blackburg far more bloody in Iraq,
http://www.juancole.com/
kathleen @ 9
I am pretty sure that happened on Ashcroft’s watch. It was several years ago, during the Abramoff - Delay heyday
EPU’d:
eCAHNomics @ 299
One of the e-mails uncovered in the document dump explained that the DoJ’s strategy would be to distract from the *reasons* the prosecutors were fired by getting the Senate to focus on the *process* by which they were fired.
So that’s the reason Gonzo has no prepared statements as to why each of the USA’s was asked to resign: it would undercut the strategy. They really don’t want to answer that question, because any anwsers will lead to either more questions (along with the introduction of evidence contradicting those answers), or perjury charges.
So instead, Gonzo’s strategy is to respond to all questions regarding the *reasons* for the firings by changing the subject to *how* they were fired and admitting ‘mistakes were made’.
Leahy picking at the scab on the infected wound that is our DOJ makes me feel better already.
Kyl and Specter can take the rest of the day off IMO.
kathleen @ 9
Some one on last thread speculated that Ashcroft might have been AG when this happpened. I don’t know myself.
just got home from work to learn that my very own Tom Coburn blistered Gonzales and told him he should resign. I’m an Okie and no fan of Coburn but for him to stand up to this issue in the manner that he did is astounding.
Cozumel @ 16
So they don’t get any closer to Bush and Rove. ? duh
Woodhall Hollow @ 14
Perhaps… But they have to replace him with:
1) A Senate-confirmable pic.
2) Someone who will play ball with ChimpCo.
A highbar is required.
Back up w/Sen. Whitehouse question.
Big.
Ah, back to the hearing.
punaise @
2
Not gonna happen. His big buddy’s got his skeevey lil’ backside. And what that hell? Why are the Senators are letting him say ‘I can’t recall…’ hundreds of times…well only 55 but you know what I mean. And don’t forget our brave coproratists MSM will be enabling this little pussbag in tomorrow’s papers.
Hatch ranting now on CSpan 2 — from well of Senate. Blasting activist judges, ranting about the partial birth abortion bill, fetuses…
Feelin’ heat creeping closer on his sneaky role in the end-around of USA confirmation in Patriot Act? You just know his staffer didn’t do that without Hatch having full knowledge and approval….
Sorry about bad post on prev thread, dear Mods. Won’t happen again.
LIVE!
steelthing @ 22
Coburn is McCain’s health policy guy as well (to McCain’s detriment, but still….)
kathleen @ 9
Frederick Black.
The Justice Department forwarded the information to then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales. Instead of receiving help, Black was pushed out of his job [see “Can Justice Be Trusted?” February 20, 2006].
I think Leahey has said he won’t confirm anyone for AG until this is straightened out.
steelthing @ 22
Nice to see another Oklahoman here.
Ooh, goody! Whitehouse. Getting the docs to Abu again, so he can’t tap dance.
Back to structure: DOJ should be indy. One institute indy from: WH. Abu agreeing.
Just switched to cnn. Wolf Blitzer says ‘….senators are outraged by the way the USA firings were handled’ Do you notice how this talking point has stuck? I’m not outraged at how it was handled. I’m outraged that the US attys were being used to influence elections. I’m outraged that Dems were investigated 8 times more than repubs. I’m outraged that we turn down Harvard grads for pat robertson robots. There’s a lot here that causes outrage. The way it was handled is the least of it.
jgabriel @ 19
Thanks for that. I can see the trap in giving reasons. But there wasn’t any process! That’s what makes that “strategy” such a disaster for him.
Unless, of course, the real process was that Rove decided & handed down “the list.”
I am in love with Whitehouse!!!!!!!!!!
another stunned coburn constituent.
solai @ 35
Brilliant.
Two letters: Reno to Special Counsel. Policy for contact between WH and DOJ under Clinton. Hatch had viewed it as significant area of oversight. Oh, this is gonna be fun!
solai @ 35
Excellent analysis. THANK YOU!
EPU’d from RBG -
During the live blogging of the hearing, please help keep the FDL servers humming along by heeding the following tips.
1. Please keep your comment(s) on the topic of the current live blogging and try to keep comment length to a minimum.
2. Please don’t nest more than 2 or 3 quotes in a comment. More than three quotes may burst the page margins for you and your fellow commenters.
3. Do not feed the trolls. It just encourages them and makes life difficult for the mods. Ignore the trolls.
4. Avoiding words like “ins*rance” or “vi*gra” will keep your comment from being trapped by the moderation filters.
5. If your comment should happen to get caught in moderation, please don’t post it again. The moderators will release it as soon as they are able to get to it.
Oh… and did I mention, please Stay on Topic and Don’t Feed The Trolls?
The live-blogging can create an enormous demand on the FDL servers. For that reason, Christy is updating the posts every 5 to 10 minutes. Please refrain from “reloading” the page more frequently than that.
Thanks.
Now hte policy of Bush. Highlighted: Contacts regarding pending cases only between the office and the office of the Counsel. Last page, exemption: Prez, VP, Counself, OVP OP Homeland Security, on and on and on…
omg - IANAL but even i can see whitehouse is about to set up abu w/ his chart from reno. woohoo!
Can anyone say if/when/where there will be a transcript on the hearing today?
solai @ 35
Wolf Blitzer is a yamering moron who has spewed to many talking points fed to him by the GOP.
Hey Oklahoma Kiddo I’m always looking for your posts here. Your very insightful. Does it astound you that Coburn of all people told Gonzo to beat it?
kathleen @ 17
NOT NOW KATHLEEN
OfT:
Steno Sue Schmidt at WaPo has an article which adheres to the Doolittle family line that the raid on their home is all about Julie Doolittle’s business. Commenters can’t call Sue Schmidt Steno Sue or even question her sources without WaPoO deleting my comment….
newtonusr @ 24
Not really, if AGAG resigns they can designate the Deputy AG to be the “Acting” AG (requires no Senate confirmation).
Clinton narrowed field of who could have discussions about cases within the DOJ. Three people. Eligible under bush: 417 people in the WH, 30 in Justice! OH JAYSUS.
Whitehouse: (giving docs to Gonzo) back to structure again. Do we agree that DOJ should be independent? Independent from WH?
G: yes.
W: docs I gave you are 2 letters, one from Reno to Lloyd Cutler, laying out policy for contact between DOJ and WH. Letter says that wrt contacts involving criminal matters should only involve WH council (or dept council) - missed part , but very small list.
Second letter, btwn only office of pres and office of AG.
So, I asked my staff, what’s difference btwn 2 letters. Here’s clinton protocol - basically 4 people on WH side, and 3 on AG side who could have these discussions.
Now, with new program, there are 417 WH folks and 30 some in DOJ who are eligible to have contacts.
Woodhall Hollow @ 37
Me too. He’s got some of that Fitz-ian charisma.
Kicked portal open so too many more people can interfere in DOJ. Abu says he was concerned.
jj @ 38
And another Oklahoman is here. I don’t feel so lonely ;0)
Whitehouse asking about the need for seperation between the WH and Justice. Last night on the plane from LA to Bilbau, Spain, I watched “Bobby”. I was reminded of the JFK Admin, and that his own brother RFK was AG.
I LOVED Bobby Kennedy, and I believe that if they wouldn’t have murdered him and his brother that our country would be MUCH better off today. That being said, It made me feel a little hypocritical to be screaming about the coziness between Chimpy and Gonzo, when we had the JFK/RFK relationship in our past. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
This is only criminal cases. Not National security.
WH: why has this been kicked so wide open so many people can be part of knowing about criminal investigations?
G: I’m not aware that there are contacts btwen WH and DOJ wrt criminal cases - I’m with you there shouldn’t be contacts
Jane is picking up the liveblogging for me while I run out to get The Peanut. Thank you, Jane!
Sen. Whitehouse going a long way…
Exhibit examining rules regarding contacts between DOJ & Executive regarding criminal cases, back to Clinton Admin… Under ChimpCo, who can have these contacts - 417 people in Admin, 30 plus in DOJ (many more than Bubba).
You were Chimpy’s lip - why all these channels?
Opportunity for mishandling info.
GOING FOR HARRIET’S THROAT!
Whitehouse: You’re morons, or you’re felonious liars.
*BAM*!
Oh, this is wonderful, Whitehouse has visuals demonstrating that literally hundreds of people has access to information about criminal and civil cases in theWH. Abu agrees, it should be limited, but doesn’t deny any of it.
Clinton’s WH gave access to 6 roles.
This guy is great.
am i loving this too much?? oh hell yessssssssssss - but we need cheney&bush in the hot seat too……
Cranky Observer @
6
Considering that a big part of the reason the GOP went down so hard in the ‘06 elections was incompetence (Katrina, etc.) and corruption, I can’t imagine that anyone who has to run in ‘08 wants to remain saddled with a guys whose defense is “I have no idea what was going on in the Cabinet department I was in charge of; I just assumed my underlings knew what they were doing and signed whatever they put in front of me.”
The noises coming out of “senior administration officials” for the past day were that this was his last chance to save himself, not that he was okay if he didn’t sink himself. If everyone (even Coburn!) agrees that he ought to go, and he doesn’t go, the Dems aren’t going to waste time pushing him out, they’re going to go on with digging into all the other evidence of DoJ wrongdoing.
WH: Miers told McKay that he had mishandled voter fraud case in his district. How did she have info in this case that he has mishandled?
Woodhall Hollow @
18
Ashcroft was nominated in November 2000 for AG and left the office in Nov. 2004….
I believe it happened in November 2002 and that the prosecutor’s name was Black who was “apparently” demoted after initiating an investigation regarding Abramoff in Guam….
hi jane .
Gonzo got his JD at Harvard. Bush got his MBA there. What’s wrong with that University?
Whitehouse making it clear that Harriet got involved–politically–with removing a DOJ atty.
Brisingamen @ 50
120 days?
RonD @
15
I hope we can get RonD a thread to examine how big a liar our soon to be ex-AG really is.
Woodhall Hollow @ 37
Whitehouse kicks ass, but so did Lincoln Chaffee. (Chaffee was so hard on Condi Rice and John Bolton during their nomination hearings) Chaffee was visibly pissed off.
Chaffee voted no on the 2002 war resolution. I like Whitehouse…I love Chaffee.
Whitehouse…whoa. How was Miers able to make an evaluative opinion of a DOJ case? Hmm?
Abu: wh, uh, mm….
Leahy: The chart is astounding. Whitehouse can go beyond his time
Leahy: the chart goes beyond anything I’ve seen here in 32 years.
Whitehouse gave a great “specific” case…
Good to pin down.
Everyone see Mc Cain singing Bomb Bomb Bomb
Ugh. Fingers ahead of ears. Whitehouse established Meiers was involved with rebuking, not removing a USA.
leahy says he will not ask some of his questions so that whitehouse can go over his time and continue with his questions !!?!!
Wh: trying to figure how WH council had info on a particular case a USA was running
G: i’m not aware - maybe these reports are inaccurate. But I’m concerned of level of contacts
Wh: can I ask a couple quick questions -
Leahy : this is astounding. Finish questions.
WH - OPR can we be assured that results of OPR investigation will be made public?
G: not my decision.
Wh: who do we talk to?
G: Paul Clementis.
zennurse @ 75
I missed the chart. We have it on audio only. I assume someone will post a jpeg???
didnt rumsfield say at 1 time that the “adults” are in charge - yeah LMAO!!! NOWW the ADULTS are in CHARGE for real!!!! FINALLY!!!
Ahorter Abu: I don’t know who’s job is what
Hedge, hedge, hedge….
Gonzo
Leahy is going to give WH his time because he finds the chart “astounding”.
Whitehouse is making it clear that OPR is politically compromised.
Badwater @ 68
They have special tracks for Rs because can’t fill all R slots with qualified entrants.
Why are they asking Gonzales to do various things for them in the future if they’re wanting to get rid of him?
Wh: can we look at record of office of inspector general to look at record of prosecutions?
It was your choice to refer this to OPR? A suspicious mind would say: OPR never makes a report. Plus, OPR always evaluates only attorneys. NOt whether they have had political pressure
Badwater @ 68
It doesn’t base admissions solely on brains.
I bet you do want to be careful about how you answer this real attorney, Abu.
IG: Going to be looking?
Why the delay, the report will be out in two years…
WhiteHouse for the White House!
I assume they want to secure future appointments with AGAG because if he simply resigns the trail goes cold there? I’m sure they want to keep him around for ammo.
even shorter abu - D’OHHHHHH hahahahahah
Okay, Whitehouse is going over my head.
“Why OPR?”
Dayum, Whithouse rocks!
The AG’s recollection “is fuzzy”. Sounds a lot like Libby’s and Rove’s memories. “Fuzzy’? Is this a GOP disease?
Gonzo: Office of Inspector General decided on its own to conduct investigation - these issues of jurisdiction has been covered. They’re going to look at these issues whether anyone has tried to mislead congress
WH - did you take into account when choosing OPR and the fact that they don’t make findings public, and the fact that they only look at conduct of attorneys (might not have that right) Why OPR?
G: that’s why i also think office of inspector General - but I can’t claim credit for that because they decided on their own.
Schumer up.
Oklahoma kiddo @
55
I know other local lurkers. I too have enjoyed reading your comments, but never posted before.
whitehouse kicked abu’s ass royally
Is there any part of the functioning of the DOJ from which Mr. Gonzales has not recused himself? How, then, can he continue to “be in charge”?
Thomas @ 94
Hmmm — you mean call him in once every month or so and grill him on something else? *g*
Isn’t that torture?
Schumer again. Hoo boy… Abu, hang onto your shorts.
Get ‘em Schumer…
Yes
eCAHNomics @ 36
I agree. The process questions are just as damning for Gonzo as the reasoning for the resignation requests. I raise the point, though, because it tells us that the administration is way more concerned about the reasons *why* the USA’s were fired than they are about Gonzo looking stupid and incompetent about the process.
schumer’s on him now
I knew they would really F**K up Abu towards the end of the day, but WOW, Whitehouse is v. impressive.
Shumer up: Atthe beginning we asked you to answer fully to show you were truly in charge and explain who when and why the USAs were fired. You sadi I don’t know 100 times. And we still don’t know who when and why
Schumer asked him to step down!!!
Shumer: Cuz you are not answering there is no reason for another round of questions. You should step down.
Go to court!
Schumer- for the good of the country, step down.
schumer says - uhhhhhh just goooooo
jj @ 102
Welcome!
Schumer cuts to the bone!
Whoa! Schumer says there’s no point in further questions, says Gonzo should just resign for the good of the country, and yields his time.
Gonzo goes into pleading mode.
Schumer: Asking you more questions is pointless as you’ve already proven you’re an incompetent weasel with lousy memory. For the good of the country step down.
Time to draw up the impeachment articles for Abu.
schumer making it clear - you got to gooooooooooo
jinny @ 88
You don’t play pok*r do ya? :)
I’ve heard better lame-assed excuses from 9 year old boys.
And now Schumer is basically saying the same thing. “the burden is on you, sir, to provide a full and complete explanation.”
So the AG thinks that it would be best for his department if he did not resign?
Abu: The burden of proof that something bad happened lies with the person making the allegations. I’ve done the best I could.
Sh: That would be true if this was a crim trial and when you answer so many I don’t know and the major details are not at your fingertips, and when you fire USAs the burden is on you
Schumer giving the smackdown goodness!
Schumer: Haven’t met your burden - examine your role and GTF Out.
Abu” I do that everyday.
Schumer: Criminality is not the standard for staying. Burden is on you.
Petrocelli @ 110
I don’t know how Whitehouse got this committee assignment, but he’s going to be an asset in the years to come. And I’ve no doubt he’ll be very busy!
Abu saying it’s up to Schumer to prove his side of it. Schumer letting him know he’s not in a court of law, but he’s answering as a public servant. Abu is responsible for answering why good attorneys were fired.
He’s literally squirming.
Schumer: you had burden of proof to meet. YOu’ve answered I don’t know or I d on’t recall to close to 100 questions. We don’t have convincing answers. You haven’t met these tests, there’s no point in another round of questions. For the good of the country, STEP DOWN.
Gonzo: I ask myself everyday, what’s good for the country. The burden of proof whether something improper happened here respectfully rests with (you). You and others are alleging things.
S: that would be true if this were a criminal trial, but standard for AG is a little higher. This info should be at your fingertips. No sir, when you fire USAs, people w good evals, devoted to their country, burden of proof on those who did the firing.
Shumer calls for Gonzo’s resignation!
Gonzo fires back - the burden of proof is on you to show I acted improperly after I’ve made myself and my staff available to you!
Specter: “Panorama of responses”, denials of knowledge, loss of cred!
methinks spector going to drop the hammer on dear abu
Say it Abu:- No Mas ! No Mas !
This is like watching Abu being skinned alive with a paperclip.
GONZO JUST TOLD SHUMER TO “TALK TO THE HAND GIRLFRIEND”
Brisingamen @ 105
Maybe I misstated that… if they accept his resignation then they may not get to the actual story behind this. However I will admit that neither party can be seen as a white knight and I wouldn’t put it past the Dems to politically torture the Repubs (in a twist of ironic revenge).
LBrowne @ 128
Whitehouse former USA. Takes this personally.
Are Gonzalez et al. even capable of humiliation and shame. I guess not.
Oh good grief, Specter, he hasn’t been forthcoming at all, you ass.
Arlen - we recognize how great you are. And I think you have been as forthcoming as you could be, but the issue of credibility has been impaired because of the panarama of responses.
Tithonia @ 129
It’s over Gonzo, throw Rove from the bus!
Spector - your credibility is impaired.
this is painful. For him… Specter is going to say it too. mmmm.
Earlier I said it’s gonna be a loooong trial.
1 2 3 4 abu hit the m’effing door
Specter - so far - not giving Abu any slack….
“Panarama of responses”? I just gotta like that.
Specter fires up the Greyhound bus, he’s heavy on the throttle, he’s shifting it into hear…..
-GSD
a “loss of credibility”
I love SenateSpeak.
Gonzo looking very defensive now. He knows its over.
Buh-bye Gonzales…
Rove is not your friend….
Time to give him up dude…
Say it, Arlen, say it…
LBrowne @ 128
I’ve never heard of him before today … really glad there are more than one “Russ Feingolds” in the Senate.
i must stand…
& give a round of applause to sen. whitehouse.
if i didnt love my sen, (schumer), so much, i would move to RI. whitehouse rocks!!! ya did good ppl of rhode island!!!
Dayum! Specter calling him a liyin sack-o- sh*t!
jj @ 38
I guess I shouldn’t have switched over to Dr. Phil when I saw Coburn was going to be the next questioner?
Come on Abu. I know where you came from, Hon. I’ve known lots of guys like you who clawed your way from nothing to get a seat at the table of the big boys. But Rove has these guys tattooing Michelin on your back. You don’t owe Rove jack shit. Set the bus on his ass.
………..wait for it…….
so long it hasnt been good knowing you………………..
Spector: You told diff stories. Invitably there is a loss of credibility. You and I talked at lunch and you elaborated upon one of your answers about Lam and you said you were involved in Lam’s dismissal.
Specter: Gonzo’s record. You’ve been forthcoming, but, issue of credibility - cred is impaired because of panorama of responses, you’ve denied being in discussions, then your 3 assistants contradicted you; you denied being part of deliberations, Lam, iglesias, cummings, and then your denial of knowing about memoranda, and then that memoranda were distributed. We talked during lunch break and you elaborated on an answer re lam, when you looked at lams record it was different than what you asked of Sampson to investigate, but in my view it was the same thing.
I know you’re doing this in good faith, but there’s a loss of crediblity.
radiofreewill @ 132
This is the equivalent of saying: I’m not quitting, you should impeach me.
c’mon Gonzo, at least take one Rove with you - he set you up for this
here it comes…
“Yer a liar…and I mean that in the nicest possible way.”
Specter is rolling into first gear……..downshifts into second….
-GSD
i’m in coburn’s district too. but i think, as speculated, he’s part of the save rove at any cost strategy. he’s not deviating from his usual bullsh-t positions. never has, never will. i write him all the time and get nada from him. also he’s personally a jerk, i think.
spector trying to let homeboy down easy…………….
Specter rambling. Feels like he’s leading up to something… but he may just be rambling.
In his testimony regarding the U.S. attorneys scandal before the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales once again offered his Sgt. Schultz defense. Like the bumbling German guard in Hogan’s Heroes, Gonzales essentially claimed “I know nothing, nothing!” Sadly, his own recent statements show that while Gonzales may be similarly stupid, he is not ignorant.
The Attorney General’s recent op-eds show his dilemma. While claiming to have played no role in the evaluation of the fired attorneys, Gonzales claimed they lost his confidence nonetheless…
For the details, see:
“Gonzales’ Sgt. Schultz Defense.”
For the latest news, document dumps, email archives, hearing transcripts and other essential materials in the firings of U.S. attorneys, see:
“The U.S. Attorney Scandal Documents.”
Raw Story “watching this is like watching a baby seal get clubbed to death”
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/....._0419.html
Gonzo a baby seal? Come on! Guantanamo… Abu Gharib
Why does Specter sound like he had about 6 martinis at lunch?
SF Chron’s Tom Meyer on AG squared
Here
Specter quickly hits third and fourth gear…..the wind is humming past the mirrors of the bus…
-GSD
I wouldn’t put my faith in Specter. He’s the one who had no problem not swearing in any of these clowns.
Will Arlen make the Firedogs cheer him?
In both the Sampson hearing and in this one, the devastating impact of Sen. Whitehouse’s questioning just can’t be overstated.
Fake prosecutors, meet real prosecutor.
And then, if Bush decides he stays, Arlen, are you ready to vote for AGAG’s impeachment? Because Senators can impeach AGs.
well schumer just nailed it -
you sir… should resign
I LOVE MY SENATOR!!!!
SPECTOR saying…”we need to get the answers”…
DUH! that’s why Gonzo was there TODAY! For Answers.
Eureka Springs @ 176
Never.
Arlen drops the hammer! NOT!
Arlen got passed a note…
Specter: I agree there’s no point in any further questions. We haven’t gotten any further answers. I urge you to put on record the details of these USA’s records so we can see. Our investigation will go forward. Re impact on dept, there’s a morale problem. There’s an implicit, maybe intended message, that USA’s should be on guard. There should be no collateral influence - for you to say its an overblown personnel matter - that can’t be erased. the clouds over the USAs can’t be erased, nor the clouds over those who weren’t fired. I’m not going to call for your resignation, its up to you and chimp.
Spector: I am not gonna ask you to resign. You and the Pres must decide.
WIMP
Arlen; I’m not going to call for your resignation.
Go home Arlen.
in other words spector said -RESIGN……
Spector has to go next time his re-election is up - he just always does this to us.
Eureka Springs @ 177
Nope. As usual.
Tom @ 165
At this point he’s much more scared of Rove than of the Senate.
Ooopss…Specter downshifts and pulls off to a rest area to give Gonzales a modified reach-around.
-GSD
Arlen says no credibility in a “friendly way”.
“Forceful witness with staying power”
No point in going further, I agree, Abu whines ab out how he has such a busy, big job, but these Senators have 5 years of ugliness to clean up and this is truly a waste of their time. Arlen is making reference to morale issues. I wish they would bring the anonymous letter from Justice in, I wish Whitehouse had done it.
MelodyMaker @ 145
Wuss!
Spinchter wusses out - again
Specter won’t be the one to put Gonzalez out of our misery. The will be Leahy.
Specter: I’m not going to call for your resignation (because I’m a weasel)
Leahy: Most Senators took this seriously.
radiofreewill @ 184
Near Arlen. You tell AGAG to resign, you’re done.
Kisses,
Karl
radiofreewill @
132
This is priceless, A Real Estate Lawyer telling a Prosecutor about criminal law. Is this the best talking point Mr. Ed gave Abu?
so arlen wimped out…….. hmmm surprise surprise
solai @ 35
You got that right!!!
The pat robertson flunkies don’t even have a degree with a level of accreditation that deserves respect.
Capital J @ 191
i’ve been surprised at how combative and dismissive gonzo has been towards the senators.
So what were you doing there, ALAN? Masturbation?
They tricked you and you don’t ask for his resignation.
Arlen’s job was to help gum this to death.
If there is a God, it may look like Leahy or…. Helen Thomas!
conniptionfit @ 196
But I did say your credibility is shot
I’ll take it ; )
selise @ 203
Gonzo serves a higher power: the Decider.
emptywheel @ 199
Exactly! They never cease to amaze (read: disgust) do they?
Somebody better check that chair Gonzales was sitting on….
Probably won’t be habitable anymore considering…
Smell you later, Abu…
leahy laying it on the line right now
Gonzalez vs. Leahy was always a Bambi vs. Godzilla scenario; no way Gonzo was coming out of this alive.
Leahy: Politics has entered DOJ to an unprecedented extent. The AG is the AG of the UNITED STATES; not WH Counsel.
Leahy: thanks Gonzo, sure it wasn’t a great day. Thanks committee, Rethugs and Dems all took this very seriously. Back when I was in law school in Georgetown, then AG called us in talked about how important DOJ is, the one truly independent arm of the gov. Talked about people who worked there - had no idea of their political affiliation. I thought - how great it would be to work there. I was blessed to become a prosecutor. I thought that the independence of being a prosecutor was most important. You said in confirmation hearing that you wanted to reassure american people that you wouldn’t politicize DOJ; I’m afraid it has been politicized to unprecidented extent. The AG is not WH council. The AG is AG of the United States.
Abu is not the Whitehouse lawyer. Damn straight.
Seems to me if Specter and Coburn want Gonzales to get out of Dodge, then it follows they should also call for Rove to leave. And…
1,491 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Firepup Patriots:
Drop the God damned shoe on ‘im Arlen and then get outta my yard!!
The fascist plan for the next two years is to penetrate the career civil service and pack as many sleepers as possible into each executive department in order to create an ongoing “Whitwater phenomenon” for the next Democratic Administration.
JEEZUS…we are in a tub a shit here…the Constitution and the institutions that are designed to protect it are circling the drain.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…TAKE NO PRISONERS - TRIALS FOR EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE BASTARDS!!!
Bustednuckles @ 187
My fav. dream - Specter & Lieberman frog marching Bush & Cheney …
Never in this country have we had this level of invasion into Americans’ privacy. Gross violations of FISA.
This does not make me happy at all.
More concerned for the system of criminal justice in this country than ever.
Adjourned.
Leahy - appointments of incompetents, invasion of americans’ privacy, misuse of NSA letters, gross misuse of FISA; so we’ll ahve to continue and will continue.
I must admit, this is a day that does not make me happy one bit. I cannot think of anytime that I’ve been more concerned, and more concerned with the system of justice in this country.
Adjourned.
Man, Leahy really made it clear what’s at stake here.
Finally Leahy gets an appropriate opportunity to say “No, YOU go fuck yourself”!
The crowd singing,”Kiss him goodbye…”
Nah nah nah nah…Gonzo goodbye
This just in. Rove hijacks Specter’s bus, hits full throttle and spots Gonzales sitting by himself on the freeway………..Blammo!
From CNN:
CNN reporting quotes from White House senior aides.
“Going down in flames.”
“Not doing himself any favors.”
“Watching clubbing a baby seal.” (watching testimony)
“Very troubling.”
“Don’t understand that tactic Gonzales used.”
-GSD
Great Chorus in the background!!
ONe humiliated man..dead man walking!
Someone hollering “74 times you used I don’t recall. 74 times!
Nah-nah-nah-nah
Nah-nah-nah-nah
GONZALES
good-bye
in the background!
The Dept. of Justice has already been politicized.
Leahy’s grasped this. These eight were all in swing
states targeted by KKKarl. (Not mentioned.)
Leahy’s good…going into violation of American’s privacy.
(there’s so much to mention… I think of Abu and I think of torture.)
Woman in the background: 74 I don’t recalls. How did he get through law school?
Nananana Gonzales, goodbye!
lets all sing along w/ the spectators ….
na na na na
na na na na
gonzales
goodbye
ok i’m lost - is abu done or is there more testimony from him?
kathleen @ 227
Good one…
Now everybody out of the way please….
Sarik @ 230
Was Rove’s name mentioned at all?
Gooper describing Gonzo questioning as “Clubbing a baby seal”.
I don’t think that was a compliment.
Overheard on C-Span mic:
“74 ‘I don’t recalls’! How did he get through law school?”
Shumer looks like the happiest man on earth. Take a look at that smile
Thought the singing and gloating by some in the audience was in extremely poor taste.
H S Truman— The buck stops here.
Abu Gonzales- The consensus stops here.
Personal responsibility vs. No responsibility.
Note: Reponsibility is being at-cause.It is holding oneself accountable.
Gonzales is being “victim” of others’ causation. He is unable see himself as causative. He must lie to preserve his self-deception.
Leahy to Gonzales,your time is up! It’s time to “Cheney Rove”!
Did Leahy just say what I thought he said, as an aside to his colleagues, not to the microphone: “A man like that shouldn’t be in charge of a lunchroom?”
Someone tell me I heard it wrong.
#230 I don’t recall
dakine01 @ 228
and then she said - “how did he get thru lawschool” hehehe
Schumer: “Wasn’t a knockout punch, but he took 20 steps back.”
The mike is still on!
Texas Betsy @ 237
Yes, DiFi asked if Abu talked to Rove about any of the USA’s.
Arlen: Not a knockout punch, took 20 steps back. Lack of regard for public if WH keeps him on.
What Leahy said: It’s a sad, sad spectacle.
Medal of Freedom time for Gonzo. He did a superb job today.
Thanks, Firepups! Great live-blogging today.
Helen @ 238
Abu-eating grin.
schumer’s answering questions now
schumer - “may not have been a knock out punch but he took 20 steps backwards”
Schumer being picked up on the mic.
Texas Betsy @ 237
Sarik @ 230
Yes, but earlier today
Gonzales today:
“I now understand there was a conversation with myself and the president,” he said at one point.
===========
Heh. I guess I’d forget a meeting with THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES too, ya’ know?
Toast.
Wow! What a summation by Leahy.
Schumer calling them abbot and costello with the finger pointing going on.
Texas Betsy @ 235
Yes several times
Patrick @ 240
I’m not watching on C-SPAN. Have the spectators been that rowdy all day?
Schumer: Given all conflicting testimony and no one can put together a coherent story the arrow is pointing toward the Whitehouse
WaPoO’s Paul Kane has a roundup of GOP Senators’ questioning of Abu.
it so sad to watch the hearing all day long and come out of it with nothing ,but a million i don’t recall. The AG had time to prepare and came in looking like a clown, sad day in america folk !
See ya pups have a good night Bob
Some woman, I assume in the spectator section says, “74 times you can’t recollect”, and asks as the AG is leaving the hearing, “how did you get through law school?”
Schumer
ARROW POINTS TO THE WHITE HOUSE.
Schumer - Arrow pointing towards the WH
Sarik @ 230
Was Rove’s name mentioned at all?
Yes, earlier today.
kathleen @ 207
This should be entered into the FDL Hall of Fame compilation of the many truly brilliant statements that have appeared on this blog.
Schumers saying to press: he may not have taken a knockout punch but he took 20 steps back. its hard to believe the WH would want him to stay. Given the contradictions btwn AG and the others, aside from credibility problems, no one can put together a coherent story. YOu’ve got AG, dep AG, and Chief of Staff to AG playing Abbott and Costello, pointing fingers at someone else, it looks more and more liek WH.
Schumer letting press know the arrow points at the WH. Bringing up Abbott and Costello, everybody blaming everybody else, what it looks like is what it is. Schumer’s talking about calling Rove and Meiers.
Schumer is pointing arrows at the White House. yeah. hehehe
TRex @ 261
whenever there’s been a break pretty much — agree with 240
To the extent that Republicans like Specter and Coburn are hammering Gonzales in this hearing, the cynic in me says they are doing it in the hopes that Abu can be forced to resign, and hopefully that will put an end to the inquiry by Democrats.
They fear that Carol Lam’s investigations in San Diego and other inquiries are going to lead right straight to the White House (and perhaps to their colleagues in the Senate as well.)
I don’t believe for a moment that Specter and Coburn are acting out of principle; they are just trying to put out the fire.
Just during breaks. As a liberal and a Democrat, I find it embarrassing.
Resignation this weekend?
Schumer: given the fact that nobody can give coherent answers as to how the list came together, the arrow points in one direction—- the WH
Talks about calling Rove and Miers.
bushco isnt going to fire abu - but abu is badly wounded however……….
marksb @ 257
Perfectly understandable. Consuming much of alcohol with the Decider may cloud memories.
Schumer - we still don’t know the story behind the list. The burden is on the WH to tell us
Patrick @ 240
Yeah, great wasn’t it? It’s a very rare chance for any dissenting citizen to be able to get close enough for their voices to be heard. I for one, am glad they expressed themselves bluntly.
TRex @ 259
Lots of Medea Benjamin during breaks and after.
Schumer is loving this.
TRex @ 261
Off camera and during breaks and recess
Texas Betsy says:
Was Rove’s name mentioned at all?
It was mentioned by Durbin…who I think was great. He’s my senator, but I don’t know if he’s a lawyer or not.
…Schumer talking off the record now…
3….
2…
1…
HECKOVAJOB ABU!
Gget Rove, and you’ll get ‘em all.
Have they been shouting and booing? Funny, the news coverage I have heard so far mentions NONE of this.
The junior high schoolish chanting after adjournment was unnecessary. It demeans the seriousness of this business. It suggest a Bush-like victory is around the corner, when the architects of this debacle at the DOJ will remain in the White House and unaccountable, even if Mr. Gonzales steps down.
As Josh Marshall has repeated several times today, Mr. Gonzales, while a terrible manager, is a bright shiny object. The threat to the administration of justice (indeed, democracy) remains Mr. Rove’s Shoppe and those who empower and pay for it.
Thanks to everyone, been lurking here most of the day, great commentary.
My RealPlayer DIED at the end of Leahy, and I rebuffered it and thought, “Why do I hear people singing? WTF is this?” Thanks to you guys, I know.
Schumer, Now we get together and examine the testimony.
juslin @ 234
what’s the point all he does is lie
Schumer emphasising that no-one is admitting responsibility for adding people to the list or taking them off, and that the committee isn’t going to let that go unanswered.
And I say: Daniel Metcalfe has been vindicated in spades.
lolo @ 290
They are adjourned. Done.
Schumer - Sampson said he didn’t put a single name on the list. NO one can say where the names came from. Everyone pointing the finger at someone else. That someone else is probably in the WH.
Press: Subpeonas?
S: First we wanted to hear from AG. He’s made a pretty conclusive case he shouldn’t be in office.
TRex @ 287
yes, at every break there have been cat calls from the audience for his resignation… impeach bush/cheney… get rove… it was a little embarassing
Schumer is holding court in the hearing room; full C-Span-3 coverage.
Some outbursts from crowd, but not too many. Still, most of it has happened during the breaks, and that’s gotten loud. People yelling at Abu about being a liar and incompetent.
Give me a break. It sounded like a high school gymnasium. We’re better than that.
TRex @ 285
True, not as dignified as it could be, but this is the time for full-spectrum resistance, and that includes public mockery.
TRex @ 259
“Poor taste.” Iraqi’s water boarded, stacked butt ass naked in a pile, blind folded and stood on a box with a hood over your head with a little electricity, Guantanamo, invasion of privacy etc etc… THAT’S “POOR TASTE”
How about crimes against humanity
Patrick @ 274
It was reported earlier that one of them was Cindy Sheehan
Schumer - what happened today stregthens the case for Rove and Miers to testify
lolo @ 291
The point for Abu is that, by lying, he retains his status as a loyal bushie.
Interesting to get all these one-name people complaining about the spectators, not discussing the issues.
Shit! Schumer was really talking to some reporters about how it all leads back to Rove and Miers and cspan cut it off!
It is clear that he is SURE they have all been lying through their teeth about their lack of memory. Esp the part about Sampson not having a clue who put anyone’s name on the list or why.
Yes, I’m sure of it. Just after the “na na na na Goodbye” chant, Leahy said to Shumer, “The man shouldn’t be in charge of a lunchroom” or something very very close to that. I wish he’d said it in his closing statement frankly.
watch for swiftboating to begin ASAP on leahy and whitehouse
Patrick @ 273
I have to agree. I understand the motivation and the legacy from ACT UP that Code Pink is trying to emulate. I also agree in principle, but I think bringing it into the Senate Chamber is disrespectful of the senators and pulls attention away from the importance and seriousness of the effort. There are other ways to make that statement.
Schumer doesn’t think much of the claims of privilege over RNCmails. Though reporter notes that DOJ isn’t likely to assign a prosecutor to help.
Press: sounds like its going to be difficult to get RNC emails. How are you going to get them?
S:We’re going to try to get them, get testimony with Rove and Miers, at least with transcripts, hopefully more. If you went inside the brain of every repub on this committee, maybe one thinks he should stay. (that’d be hatch)
I agree with this. Public outcry has been stifled in every other venue. They bought this. Now it’s time to make them pay.
I find all of the theatrics and clowning to be rather annoying too.
Just like the person standing behind Val Wilson with the head shaking and tsk-tsking….It gives the opposing side ammunition to lump Democrats in with the kooky krowd.
It makes a very serious matter seem unserious and it makes me think people would rather hear themselves than watch history unfold around them.
Imagine “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Joe McCarthy has got to go” instead of “Have you no sense of decency”.
-GSD
CSpan 3 open mic - Shumer saying things are pointing more and more to the White House.
Next steps, he continues, will be a transcript follow-up and then we’ll look at Rove and Miers.
I don’t think the White House would want to keep Gonzo, after today, he’s saying.
Sampson said he didn’t put a single name on the list himself. No one will own up to who put the names on the list? The most likely somebody else to have put the names on the list are from the White House.
With appproved subpoenas, what will do next? We’ll see if Gonzo stays in office first - he shouldn’t he said - and then we’ll look at who put the names on the list.
Battle was unaware of any performance problems. The logical origination for this point is the White House.
Most claims of privilege don’t work, Shu says. Looking for testimony from Rove and Miers, with transcripts or more.
So, let’s see if Gonzo stays - most Repubs on committee don’t think he should stay.
The key issue is - who put the names on the list, because there appears to be no good reason to fire these attorneys.
Schumer is still going on CSPAN3
Woodhall Hollow @ 305
goto cspan 3
That’s worse than poor taste — it’s criminal.
Thomas @ 294
It may be embarassing to YOU, but after 6 years of crowds handpicked to be smarmily adoring towards Cheney and his minions, it sounded like a choir of angels to me.
Had Mr. Rove had the good fortune to have spent his career in South or West Africa, he would now be hoping and praying that he had found a state without extradition treaties.
Perhaps we should take to the streets.
CSPAN 3 is still live w/ Schumer’s comments
S: we’re going to take AG’s testimony and compare it with others - what he says and what underlings say don’t square. But as Sen Leahy has said, we are going to continue to move forward.
Woodhall Hollow @ 304
Cspan3 letting him continue to talk.
Badwater @ 303 says
Except, when he’s got folks like Coburn questioning his credibility, he HAS to be toast. Coburn is as wing-nuttery of any wing-nut
Hi pups. I’m sure this probably was said above, so excuse me. WTF Arlen Spector. A few days ago some explained spector’s “scottish law” spineless tendency. He sure met that standard today. He is a true invertebrate.
All I have to say is MAJOR PROPS to all those who live-blogged the Libby trial. This live-blogging is hard.
Bustednuckles @ 284
Now here’s your medal, don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!
Schumer asked if any negotiations with WH; Schumer says no. He says if they’re smart at all, they’ll start looking to clear this up after today.
Woodhall Hollow @ 305
Still on the live TV coverage on CSPAN3
selise - still recording? I’m gonna post Schumer’s presser, unless you’re gonna include it with your mp3’s…
If he ever finishes!
Schumer said this “is not over, far from it”.
-GSD
Schumer: “This is not over, far from it”.
earlofhuntingdon @ 319
Wasn’t Jenna, or not-Jenna, touring South America last year looking for just such a state?
Marcy, Christy, Jane … any comments that Leahy & Co. are setting up Abu to plea bargain and get Rove/Bush/Cheney?
Whitehouse’s chart might be a glimpse of what else they have on these guys.
I think Abu feels cut loose by his ‘friends’ right now, and hell hath no fury than a (wo)man scorned.
These Bush cronies have skins thicker than a crockodile: They only leave office with the help of a crow-bar.
I personally don’t mind the taunting - AG and evryone else in this administration has it coming - but you KNOW the wingnutteri are going to gloss over everything else that happened today and start bleating about how “those evil liberals showed no respect for the Attorney General”.
Well…fuck them.
I really think that an underlying theme in all this…certainly in the suggestion of firing all the USAs, and also in Bush’s villefying of
“trial attorneys”…is his getting turned down from the University of Texas’ law school. I imagine he’s the type to nurse a life-long grudge.
Was our transgender friend from Code Pin there?
GSD @ 312
When you compare what the republic party has done, it really pales. Maybe it was in bad taste, but they were not doing it while committee was in session. The whores haven’t even mentioned it.
shumer still yaking
Did anyone hear the people from the gallery singing as Abu left. They sang the goodbye song, you know, the one they do at a sporting event when it is obviousthat the other team has lost. nah, Nah, Nah, NA, Nah, nah na Goodbye..
Oooh, Chuck just predicted the WH will toss him over!
Sarik @ 334
UT actually expects people to have working brains.
Schumer- We are going deeper. WH behind firings.
CHS always says it best- Sunshine, Oversight, Disinfect our Fed. Gov.
Flipping over now to CNN- Choapalooza. Tabloids, meet MSM…
Press to schumer - did you ever think you’d come to the point where you’d say - there’s no point in further questions
Helen @ 325
You are a saint for doing it today. Again, many thanks.
“I think the White House will not keep him after today” Schumer
Stick a fork in Abu, he’s done.
Schumer mugging for the cameras, but that’s okay. He made some good points.
LJ/Aquaria @ 342
Yeah, Harvard and Yale legacies don’t need brains, just connecitons.
My guess? Friday @ 4:30 bu bye Abu
kathleen @ 301
Thank you, Kathleen. Name calling is NOT the same as blindly enabling your “patron’s” attempts to subvert the Constitution.
–entire hearing to b replayed on cspan after the house coverage is finished for the day
So, what’s the next step? Provided that Gonzo and Bush continue to stick their middle fingers up at demands that he resign, what’s the next step? More questioning of other DOJ personnel, more demands for un redacted documents? At what point is the next legal step to begin impeachment proceedings against Gonezo?
Tom @ 336
I agree with you….
In the realm of what is going on this taunting is minor league and doesn’t detract from the focus or the importance of these hearings….
Personally it’s not that big a deal and it’s a “free country” (LOL) so what…
The WH scuttlebutt seems to be setting things up for Bush to show himself a decisive deciderer by canning Abu G after these new revelations about how he was deliberately kept out of the loop by the White House… oh.
Tweety leading off with Abu’s statement. CSpan3 coverage ended
Helen, carolyn urban and the rest - Cheers for a great job.
And to Christy for putting up with out bullshit!
Janes upstairs
LJ/Aquaria @ 347
He can’t be mugging as much as Scoots and wife did during his trial.
I just want to know if anyone else heard the same thing I did, just after the “Na na na nah, goodby e chant, when Leahy first went over to Shumer.
THe mic was live and I swear Leahy said, “A man like that shouldn’t be charge of a lunchroom” or something close to that.
Anyone else?
newtonusr @ 357
Seconded! And Thank You Jane too!!
On the taunting: yes, it’s inelegant. But after six years of being told that reasoned disagreement is treasonable, it’s about fucking time these cossetted, secretive bastards got some public dissent in their smirky lying faces.
1,491 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Firepup Patriots:
The next eight weeks are gunna be critical in terms of whether or not we are able to eradicate the cancer on our democracy and save the Constitution.
The House hasta request all the evidence Fitz has got and then advance enough to him to get ‘im back into the game. Then Conyers has gotta start impeachment hearings for BOTH the Vice President and the President to keep them from bein’ able to appoint replacements for senior officials resignin’ under investigation and indictment. Then the Senate hasta initiate enabling legislation for a special prosecutor for the US Attorney mess and the packing of the civil service positions in the Department of Justice. Finally, subpoenas hafta go out from both the Senate and the House committees for Rove, Ralston, Mc Naulty, Harriet Meyers and everyone on the list of e-mail accounts with the RNC. The Republican Party hasta be forced ta decide if they are gunna go down under a RICO investigation with the Chimpenfuerer and Darth Cheney or if they’re gunna save whatever is salvageable of the GOP and bail out on the fascists.
KEEP THE FAITH AND LOCK ALL THE BASTARDS UP!!
My guess: the Repubs ‘threw in the towel’ - Specter didn’t call for Gonzo’s resignation because they’ve agreed to cut him away.
Mae @ 325
he’s been at it since the warren commission.
Texas Betsy @ 323
Late nite with TRex tonight is going to be loads of fun !!!
tbsa @ 338
I’m certainly not outraged and I also believe that it is their right to do what they do. I also think that in contrast to the moral outrages of Gonzales…this doesn’t register on the scale on iota…I guess I am just a fuddy-duddy when it comes to these types of hearings, I like to have the fireworks emanate from the proceedings as opposed to the gallery.
-GSD
That being said….Gonzales is a douche.
Yeah, thanks Mae….Arlen, not Alan.
Thanks Mabel’s Wig Shack, and I love your handle. Do you really work in/own a wig store
Of course it’s their right to be heard. Unfortunately, the manner in which they choose to make themselves heard comes off as childish.
GSD @ 311
While I found some of the antics of Code Pink especially annoying during Valerie Plame’s testimony. Many of these people have invested thousands of hours before the invasion trying to stop the potential killing and quagmire in Iraq.
Code Pink’s crew have kept the War on the front pages across the country. They are not partisan, they proved that by going after Senator Feinstein for war profiteering and her very serious conflict of issue…chairing MILCON
They have earned their right to appropriately protest, even though I find it annoying at times
All I can say is that I truly hope this leads into concrete investigation into how corrupt this administration and neoconservatism is.
Please. Mr. Gonzales would be “gone” only if this President wanted an effective leader, manager and lawyer at the DOJ. Mr. Bush, meaning Mr. Rove, wants someone who will take orders, who does not have the experience or stature to lead Justice, and who is unlikely to “go native” on him and enforce the law in a bipartisan manner.
Mr. Gonzales will stay unless removed on impeachment, which would be a waste of time. I would rather have the House and Senate hold dozens of these hearings and document the record. Doing so is vital to fixing the many problems Mr. Bush will leave behind, and to informing the electorate in ‘08.
now - after the hearing, will abu continue in his capacity as AG? i would think he’s been marginalized but i’m not a legal person… tweety’s back and lets see whats up with him today - oh he has the repug TP in full mode…
Josh Marshall is saying to keep your eye on the ball. Gonzales may be fun to make fun of as he goes down in flames, but he is a diversion. Who made the list? Who floated the idea of unlimited “interim” appoinments? Who decided on the 8 for termination? It is clear Gonzo is delegating the authority to Sampson and Sampson is saying he just collected thoughts and lists.
Who made out the agenda and when? It has to be a document or a phone call, but it has to be there. Leahy and Conyers need to stay focused on who and when and start using the Congressional police to collect subpoenaed documents from the RNC. Now.
New Thread upstairs
some of this is repeated above,
but AFTER the hearing, CSPAN3 kept
braodcasting, and the following
was heard [more here]:
. . .and then, at 4:50 p.m., the
gallery crowd sang “nah, nah, nah, good bye. . .”
on audible record of cspan3. . .
one shouts “74 times he said, ‘i don’t recall’. . .”
post-hearing on cspan3. . .
sen. chuck schumer:
“. . .kyle sampson testified under oath,
earlier this week, that he did not add a
single name to the list.
. . .mr. gonzales said sampson was the decider.
that can’t be right. mr. gonzales said he wasn’t
the decider. . . then, that points to the white house. . .”
Alberto VO5 - he’s all worked up into a lather
zennurse @ 307
i get very pissed off when it is disruptive - like speaking or holding signs that interfere with peoples views. but, after the hearing is over (or by message on a t-shirt) - i think it’s great….
and here’s why - i think most of the reporters have NO idea how pissed off people are. this is one good way to make that message clear.
at the lunch break, one could see all the reporters going over to the protesters to get pictures and comments.
many thanks to those protesters who give their time to this important work.
Really?
Jane, Christy, TRex, and all the rest of the firedogs and commenters-Thank you, thank you, thank you. You guys are the best, and I’m honored and humbled to be able to hang out with you guys. Thanks again.
it sounded like a choir of angels to me
Me too. As long as we have the right to speak out we should “say it loud and say it proud”.
The man is despicable and is responsible for the torture (many times to death) of innocent human beings, not to mention 100 other crimes.
Let him hear the derision of the public. Code Pink and Cindy Sheehan and whoever else was there represented my anger too.
SING OUT LOUISE!!!
Gonzo deserves to lose his job, he is incompetent AND a criminal. But hey, I agree Bushie should keep him on, just more excuse, as Shumer said, to shine the light on Rove, Miers and the WH. Bring it the fuck on!
What they claim as their strength (loyalty) is also going to be their undoing. I WANT ROVE, so let AG stay -he’s beyond. worthless, in or out of his job, but he may just lead to Turdblossom.
Thanks for the great live-blogging!
What Sen. Hatch wants most of all is Mr. Gonzales job.
Patrick @
380
What war?
Protesters are SUPPOSED to be annoying!
I hate to cut off Brendan’s latest (and important) post on NARAL, but we really need a new thread to continue discussion on today’s Gonzales hearing.
Maybe a new thread can be added while bumping Brendan’s post to the top?
Tweety has David Rifkin on. What a load of horses**t!
So when will Bush give his “support” speech? and how long after that will he can Gonzo?
Tomorrow Gonzo goes to the office- people will scurry out of his way in the hall with downcast eyes- a few gooper ass kissers will holler- “Ya gave em hell Abu” etc. and the sane people will look away in even deeper embarassment.. Someone will put “Nobody loves ya when yer down and out” on the PA system and a Gonzo clone (or clown) will hurry over to take it off.
Gonzo will puke in his shoes and this thing will be about over.
Actually, I liked the taunts to the AG as he was leaving the hearings. A little dose of reality perhaps introduced into this little man’s little world. Reminds me of “hell no, we wont go!” I find it refreshing.
Eureka Springs @ 386
Here, here. I retreat to my fuddy-duddy corner with a red ass.
-GSD
P.S. MSNBC is now pulling way back on the VT killings. They have gotten some serious flack for running so hard with the Natural Born Killer angle.
Maybe they’ll cover some news.
yellowdogD @
388
Will he bring on his “Irish Virgin” to be fair and balanced?
That idiot tweety asking so what? who does it disturb if the AG hasn’t been doing his job? Fer gawds’ sake!
1,491 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen dude and the Firepup Patriots:
Ther must be an echo in here but it’s a lot more articulate than my original shout…”Leahy and Conyers need to…start using the Congressional Police to collect subpeonaed documents from the RNC. Now.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…WE CAN’T LET ANY OF ‘EM GET AWAY!!
He was most disgusting with Anita Hill.
newtonusr @ 328
i’ve still been recording… and kept it going through schumer’s presser… until the point where schumer says “there’s so many loose end in their priviledge argument that is doesn’t work) - and then i lost the connection… so i may have missed a bit ( don’t know how much)
so, it would be great if you also posted schumer’s presser… and cross post whatever i’ve got (if you want).
will upload now (it will take a few minutes).
Eureka Springs @ 386
I agree with Eureka. Frankly, I can’t think of any ground that should be considered more hallowed for a protest than Senate and House chambers. They are, at least ostensibly, the places for the peoples voices to be heard.
As long as the protesters don’t interrupt questioning or testimony, I say more power to them.
Helen @ 326
To the best of my recollection, I don’t recall it ever being done better.
OTOH since it appears to have been done so smoothly, what evidence do you have that it is hard. Just because it is hard, or virtually immpossible, for us mere mortals does not mean that it is hard for the FDL First Team Varsity.
Christy etal you are absolutely amazing!
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
yellowdogD @ 388
who is that guy???
cnn has the VT story have they mentioned the hearing at all? just curious
selise @ 393
Gimme a couple minutes.
Taste? Talk to the almost 3000 plus dead soldiers killed in Iraq or the almost 3/4 of a million dead Iraqis about taste. Didn’t the AG advise his leader it was legally cool to attack Iraq?
rwcole @ 387
Your lips to Gods ears
Whitehouse was really impressive, most D should forfeit their time to this guy all the time. If Rove ever faces Whitehouse, the lying from the guest table will be tsunamic…
Irishamerican @
56
I’m not concerned with Chimpy’s relationship with Gonzo. I’m worried about Rove’s relationship with 29 people in the DOJ, and the legions of Rove & Cheney minions bearing down on DOJ folks.
Bob in HI
Well, time to get off the lake’s generous couch and get to going….
Good times and enjoyed being part of the company…
Best wishes all you firepups!!!
CHRISTY - JANE - FIREDOGLAKERS - COMMENTERS - KUDOS ALL AROUND!!!!! first time i was able to keep up for a change :o)
schumer has offered to
show the press where, in
the kyle sampson transcript,
kyle said he did not add a
single name to the list — and
he said that the precedents show
a privilege argument almost never
works. . . so he “guesses” they’ll
have to move forward to rove and miers. . .
“. . .of course, that is the chairman’s call — with
the advice of the minority members. . .
but i think we ought to move this forward. . .”
schumer also said that the white house
must recognize that gonzales set his cause
back, and their cause back, a good twenty
steps today. . .
Quebecois @ 402
I agree, they can make their statements and yeild to Whitehouse. The guy really knows how to dig.
Those charts were things of beauty. I loved the way he mentioned the Clinton process, and how it was suggested to Janet Reno by Hatch of all people. I hope that there is a good youtube of that which can go viral.
juslin @ 407
ditto that!
sorry, completely OT, but has anyone seen this? and what do we know about the Federal database for Meds?
Glenn Greenwald makes a remarkably good catch. First, he quotes an ABC report on the Virginia Tech shooter (emphasis added by me):
Some news accounts have suggested that Cho had a history of antidepressant use, but senior federal officials tell ABC News that they can find no record of such medication in the government’s files. This does not completely rule out prescription drug use, including samples from a physician, drugs obtained through illegal Internet sources, or a gap in the federal database, but the sources say theirs is a reasonably complete search.
Greenwald then asks what you and I should have asked when we first scanned this paragraph: Files? Federal database?
Quebecois @
404
If Whitehouse showed his chart at this hearing, when Abu was clearly bludgeoned already, what else might the Dems have on Bush & Co. I predict many sleepless night for Bush & Co. Impeachment cannot come soon enough.
lolo @ 48
This was during a break!
I loved the goodbye song. It just sounded so perfect. It was real and authentic and spontaneous. I just wanted to be with them singing too. The games over for abu. One pawn taken. Now for the major pieces hiding in the corner…kkkKarl and Shooter and Dim son.
Does anyone know if this will be re-broadcast on C-span 1 or 2 as it was done on the earlier hearings. I have been checking the C-span website and don’t see it on the schedule yet. I would like to watch the hole thing in it’s entirety.
xargaw @
415
CSPAN1 said they would replay the whole thing tonight, right after the House coverage has ended.
Some great vids at ThinkProgress: http://thinkprogress.org/
Gonzo did exactly what was expected of him. He took all the arrows; the rest of the gang is back in the forest.
So, who hasn’t thought about Iraq today. Or about the work at Justice not being done because its top brass are at a prayer meeting at the RNC. Who isn’t picketing about the union bashing and lay-offs. Who said less today or this week than they intended because they don’t know who’s listening. And aren’t the FBI and Justice Department still doing all the nasty things that have been disclosed, and more, because nothing has changed?
McCain meet fork.
-GSD
TRex @ 311
i agree - when the morning session ended & i heard the outraged voices in the background it brought tears to my eyes. years of no opportunity to voice dissent in the capitol bldg ….. i needed that release.
bastards!
newtonusr @ 399
great!
i’m uploading this afternoon’s mp3s now… it will take a bit (probably 10-15 min).
do you know how much (if any) i missed from schumer’s presser?
xargaw @ 414
And there will be a complete rebroadcast on sunday, I think I might recall eleven in the morning, if i recollect correctly…
NorskeFlamethrower @ 363
agreed. impeachment. asap. like yesterday.
Capital J @ 90
you;re absolutely right
LJ/Aquaria @ 232
Getting in was hard. Getting thru was not as hard. He has never claimed to have set the place on fire. Once you’re in, you can have C’s and still gradulate. I mean, there’s a reason he spent the last two decades as W’s legal valet. It’s not that he was plotting evil from day one. It was the best career path available to him and for most of those two decades it paid off for him. But when W lost Congress last November and we got some real oversight, even the attorney general of the united states must sometimes have to stand naked.
xargaw @ 413
newtonusr and i will have the audio files (mp3s) posted soon… and i would be very surprised if c-span does not rebroadcast it (it may be later night or early morning though).
for this morning’s audios, here’s the link (scroll down to the bottom of the list).
Brisingamen @
105
It’s only torture if it causes ‘major organ malfunction.
Since Gonzo’s brain is already dysfunctional…
with no legal expertise whatsoever - I’M drawing up impeachment papers….. if only…………
twolf1 @ 416
Right under ‘RECENT PROGRAMS’
Morning Session:
http://www.c-span.org/
*req RealPlayer
selise @ 418
From the time he begins, it runs 10:45.
BUT - my dot mac account is acting up - can I u/load this thing for you to host? It’s 3.1mb.
xargaw @
415
C-Span announced that they will be replaying it all after the House finishes business for the day. Don’t know when that will be tho.
Excellent job, Christy! So much so, I just have to share, even though I’m sure many before me have already highlighted my points:
Alberto Gonzales-he thinks, he recalls, but he’s not definitive on any of his statements. Does he go to any meetings where the minutes are held/recorded? Can he even read? How much more evidence do our Congressional Leaders need to impeach ALL of them? Isn’t record keeping paramount to the legal profession? Where the hell did he get his law degree? How in the ethical name of justice is he able to keep his license?
“What was Goodling’s role in choosing attorneys for termination? AG says he doesn’t know everything she did. She, in essence, supported Mr. Sampson — she was WH liaison for the office”. How about some basics! Let’s cut back on the generals (everything, nothing, recall, remember) and answer the question! Are you saying you don’t know what the f*** she did because you don’t have a copy of her job description? What? She’s a liaison and you don’t have documentation on what her conversations entailed with the boys in the White House? WTF?
“AG can’t recall specifically the President telling him to fire a USAtty”. Can this man write? These statements are of significance and Al doesn’t write it down? Shit, is everything off the record up there?
If ever we needed some quality recording equipment to help jog their memory as to when, where, why, and who with, it’s now! Could we use warrantless wiretapping for them? Isn’t ‘what’s good for the goose is good for the gander’? If the boys can listen to us without a warrant, aren’t they considered US Citizens too? Aren’t ‘we the people’ supposed to be following their example? You know, leadership, accountability, honesty, integrity. Hell, it’s open season!
Geeeezuus! Let me get this straight; put it into context: I’m a nurse, so that means I don’t have to chart a blessed thing on ‘you’, my patient? Something significant happens to ‘you’, but since I can’t recall ‘everything’ about ‘you’, I don’t have to provide any answers at all? If ‘you’ die on my watch, I can tell half stories, directly contradict those who worked with me, and other than a grueling day in front of the ‘committee on the hill’, I get to walk? CHOICE! And still get to keep my license to continue to practice even if I ‘decide’ to resign? Rock On! Because, hey, if I’m getting this right, if the Attorney General can get away with it, why can’t I??!!!
I don’t get it; how many times has Bush, Gonzales, et al…, said they “accept responsibility” for their actions, inactions, statement, misstatements, etc…., and nary any hint of consequences? With the exception of Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003061.php), there’s really been no mention of real, bonafide repercussions to this national disgrace of incompetence (diplomatically speaking!)? His resignation shouldn’t be a request; it should be demanded! Our laws are nothing if they’re not enforced! Come on!
Rhode Island has a great senator in Whitehouse. He kicked some serious ass today. Figures he is a former USA.
Great day. I’ve been happily lurking out here in SactoLand (Can I get a Nah nah nahhh nah for DooDooLittle?).
Thanks to CHS, Jane, Helen and all the Big Dogs in here, these ain’t no puppies . . . . Awesome live blogging.
I sure hope Schumer’s arrow flies swift, straight and true to the heart of the Darth Star itself.
Norske #363 . . . that was almost erotic, it was so well put!
“Nah nah nahhhhh, nah . . “
conniptionfit @ 430
Looks like RIGHT NOW (5:53) on CSpan2 and MIDNIGHT on CSpan1: http://inside.c-spanarchives.o.....hedule.csp
newtonusr @ 427
then i’m probably missing 2 minutes!
yes, please do email me your file (at speakeasy dot net) and i will host.
once i get your file, i’ll edit my part 4 (to remove schumer presser portion) and post yours (with you name and labeled at schumer presser) as part 5.
does that sound ok with you?
Lou Costello @ 427
hey lou -
have ya noticed that sen schumer keeps using abbot & costello as an analogy. cool huh?
Patrick @ 275
I don’t know who was being rowdy, but there were several ladies there with pink shirts and white caps (and therefore probably Code Pink folks?) Mostly during the day, “rowdy” meant holding up their signs in a way that obstructed the view of others. Vocal “rowdiness” mainly erupted on breaks, and especially at the end.
Bob in HI
twolf1 @ 416
CSPAN will also rebroadcast
it, in its entirety, on sunday
morning (time?), or so the comentator
voiced-over right before the
signoff today. . .
Gonzo hearing, Part I, being replayed now on C-Span 2.
jackie @ 411
Yes — many anti-depressants are on the Controlled Substance list. Each hospital, pharmacy and doctor is required to account for what they prescribe and/or dispense, and the identity of the person to whom those drugs are given.
Why do you think there was such an uproar over Limbaugh trying to re-enter the US with drugs that were labled with someone else’s name?
All controlled substances in hospitals and pharmacies are kept under lock and key, and are regularly inventoried. Each unit in a hospital is required to do a drug count at the end of each shift.
If Cho was being treated for a mental condition with medications, there should be a record in his physician’s office and at the pharmacy from which his medications were purchased.
JGabriel @ 439
CSPAN2 now: http://www.c-span.org/watch/
selise @ 432
Lovely. Done. And thanks!
Dhalgren @
432
He surprised me. Apparently, he surprised and/or impressed Mr Chairman too. He brought some serious umm.. oversight. That was cool. Waayyy cool.
Whitehouse surprised a lot of people, myself included. I missed the blog of Sampson’s hearing and had not heard of him until today. I will not forget him either.
I loved Schumer talking in the end (for Bush & Co. to hear, no doubt) that he will be seeking testimony from Rove, Miers, etc.
Can we get Whitehouse’s charts linked - someone suggested jpeg files earlier. Much appreciated.
Christy, I don’t know how you eat Popcorn and blog with comments … do you walk on water as well? *g*
newtonusr @ 440
all done, thanks!
here’s the link (scroll down to bottom of the list) for the entire hearing in 5 parts.
selise @ 442
Thanks.
I love my iPod loaded with this type of stuff. The Feingold hearing from last week was a great listen.
newtonusr @ 444
what geeks. *g*
i also liked zbig in before the senate armed forces committee (scarey though).
if you’re i’ve got a list of links to al gore speeches and interviews since 2002.
i think, though, what i enjoy most is downloading and listening to public university lectures. someday i’ll have to make a list of some of my favs of those to share.
Irishamerican @
56
The coziness isn’t quite the same. Seems the Kennedy boys were much better at compartmentalizing things…both JFK and RFK were having a sexual r’ship with Monroe yet they both seemed to be functioning well in their public policy areas.
You do Bobby and Jack a great disservice, a libelous disservice even, by comparing the asshole president and his criminal AG to these two men. While they were not without their faults they came nowhere near the salacious indecent conduct that’s going on in this administration.
Just one more thing: Remember when the WASPish GOP decided to go after JFK because he was a Roman Catholic and they tried to conjure up images of the Pope dictating policy and JFK slavishly listening to him?
Think of how the reality of that religious relationship compares to the takeover of the executive branch of the USG by fundamentalist elements, specifically people from the born-again movement who believe that if you lie to people who haven’t been born-again it’s OK because we don’t count, kind of like if you haven’t accepted Jesus as your personal savior you’re going to hell.
And they had the NERVE to impugn Catholics!!
selise @ 444
Wow, nice - new to me!
I managed to grab a bunch of Gore speeches on QT vid (the NYU piece, the MoveOn piece), but I never got around to extracting the audio.
And I’m still looking for the full audio of Cuomo’s ‘84 Dem Convention speech, but i can only find snippets.
geeks rule
Who is deputy AG now? (Who could be Gonzo’s replacement.)
newtonusr @ 446
Nerd alert!
Patrick @ 448
As a deaf chick with no cable or digital tv subscription by which I could watch today’s hearing, I am much obliged for the live-blogging, comments, url links and other information so many of you contributed today. In a visual-oriented world, words are a gift. First-time visitor to this site but what a heck of an introduction I got today, yes?
Again, my thanks.
melissa @ 451
welcome! hope you decide to stay and keep commenting!
p.s. someday we ought be able to get transcripts of these hearings posted in a timely fashion. transparent government for all!
newtonusr @ 447
is this (or this) what you are looking for?
newtonusr @ 447
i haven’t been able to figure out how to rip the video from realplayer (or other streaming sources) on my mac - well, without using 2 computers and my eyetv in a crazy rube goldberg setup.
if you have any hints for me, please do share.
Apologies are fine, but only when coupled with credible contrition and a demonstrable willingness and ability to change. The Bush administration has perfected the “professional apology” that contains none of these characteristics. Like its version of “accountability”, its version of “apology” no longer carries any meaning.
A Bush apology won’t restore Ms. Plame’s anonymity, though he hasn’t made one to her or the CIA for the damage caused by his immediate subordinates. It will not restore the dignity to government employees shorn of their union protections. It will not restore Georgia Thompson’s home or career, or restore the credibility of Mr. Gonzales’ Justice Department, any more than it will restore freedom to those mistakenly or brazenly and wrongly held in Mr. Bush’s secret prisons.
If sincere apologies were not enough to save the USA careers of Mr. Iglesias or Ms. Lam, a Bush apology from Mr. Gonzales should not be enough to save him from the dismissal and ignominy he so richly deserves.
selise @ 452
That is exactly what I was looking for. FLAC file!
(bows deeply, with gratitude & awe) - thanks so much!
what norskeflamethrower says; yah, and fer sure.
peas!
Christy,
Thank you so very much for the great service you are doing. Without your live blogging, I’d have to rely on ‘analysis’ by the MSM — yeh, not a good thing.
I know it’s a strain, but please know that you are doing a great thing for your readers and your country. Thank you.
emptywheel @ 200
PS - Please see attached file [uandawnkey.jpeg]
The Blackberry System ™