<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Mutiny on the Potomac?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:24:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sal the barber</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-637228</link>
		<dc:creator>sal the barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-637228</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;what a farago of rose-colored sentiment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the closest that any congressional dem within a mile of the leadership has come to “moral” considerations is that a huge number of us voters find bushco’s conduct morally reprehensible, and that we are likely to take it amiss if our hirelings’ statements don’t reflect our convictions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but you better believe that’s far from saying that their sense(s) of morality and/or patriotism are governing the leadership’s actions.  i don’t say that they are utterly devoid of a sense of the higher purposes. most of them are human, after all.  but all we know of their records suggest that those senses are systematically marginalized into practical dormancy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a reasonable way to read the leadership’s moral courage-o-meter is to observe their attitude on impeachment.  they obsessively fear admitting the existance of the impeachment mechanism.  they are way more scared of just discussing the matter seriously than they are of any damage that bushco could concievably do in the coming months.  and most of them freely admit that the administration is determined to wreak more havoc on every level until the bitter end.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but our leaders don’t even dream of risking a thing they think they have to perform their assigned roll in removing this catastrophic government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i don’t know about you, swopa, but i feel that i have to suffer such people until and unless something better emerges.  but i don’t have to fall blindly in love with them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a farago of rose-colored sentiment.</p>
<p>the closest that any congressional dem within a mile of the leadership has come to “moral” considerations is that a huge number of us voters find bushco’s conduct morally reprehensible, and that we are likely to take it amiss if our hirelings’ statements don’t reflect our convictions.</p>
<p>but you better believe that’s far from saying that their sense(s) of morality and/or patriotism are governing the leadership’s actions.  i don’t say that they are utterly devoid of a sense of the higher purposes. most of them are human, after all.  but all we know of their records suggest that those senses are systematically marginalized into practical dormancy.</p>
<p>a reasonable way to read the leadership’s moral courage-o-meter is to observe their attitude on impeachment.  they obsessively fear admitting the existance of the impeachment mechanism.  they are way more scared of just discussing the matter seriously than they are of any damage that bushco could concievably do in the coming months.  and most of them freely admit that the administration is determined to wreak more havoc on every level until the bitter end.</p>
<p>but our leaders don’t even dream of risking a thing they think they have to perform their assigned roll in removing this catastrophic government.</p>
<p>i don’t know about you, swopa, but i feel that i have to suffer such people until and unless something better emerges.  but i don’t have to fall blindly in love with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead last</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-637049</link>
		<dc:creator>dead last</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-637049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“President has become incapacitated — paralyzed by his unwillingness to admit mistakes”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another similarity to Vietnam — Bush is AWOL&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“President has become incapacitated — paralyzed by his unwillingness to admit mistakes”</p>
<p>Another similarity to Vietnam — Bush is AWOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcgeek</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636895</link>
		<dc:creator>mcgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636895</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So Reid just quoted the VP to Bush….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Go F#@$ yourself!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I did get the quote right didn’t I???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Reid just quoted the VP to Bush….</p>
<p>“Go F#@$ yourself!”</p>
<p>I did get the quote right didn’t I???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: im4mary</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636855</link>
		<dc:creator>im4mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Swopa - I couldn’t agree with you more.  This has been a very turbulent week, indeed.  The executive branch needs to be relieved of their duties asap before they can inflict more damage upon our country and the Constitution in which it exists.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swopa &#8211; I couldn’t agree with you more.  This has been a very turbulent week, indeed.  The executive branch needs to be relieved of their duties asap before they can inflict more damage upon our country and the Constitution in which it exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: presque vu</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636551</link>
		<dc:creator>presque vu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636551</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Congress has the authority to declare war, can they declare this one over?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Congress has the authority to declare war, can they declare this one over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shell</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636514</link>
		<dc:creator>Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636514</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BUT — even if he doesn’t leave office in disgrace, we must not forget.  That always seems to happen.  If he sticks it out, and leaves in Jan. 2009, STILL prosecute him.  It seems that has never happened.  Cheney, too — although he will probably be dead by then.  (His heart, you know.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUT — even if he doesn’t leave office in disgrace, we must not forget.  That always seems to happen.  If he sticks it out, and leaves in Jan. 2009, STILL prosecute him.  It seems that has never happened.  Cheney, too — although he will probably be dead by then.  (His heart, you know.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanD</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636510</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636510</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I mean 11/1/08.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And there’s a new thread.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean 11/1/08.</p>
<p>And there’s a new thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SusanD</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636501</link>
		<dc:creator>SusanD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636501</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bush can leave on November 1st for all I care.  Just so long as he leaves in disgrace.  He’s earned it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush can leave on November 1st for all I care.  Just so long as he leaves in disgrace.  He’s earned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shell</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636491</link>
		<dc:creator>Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636491</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;SusanD –&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I, too, want Bush GONE.  And Cheney.  But if they leave office, the GOP will put in someone else … who will becomes prez in 2008?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I distinctly recall when Nixon left office, and Ford became prez.  Most seemed to think that if Ford hadn’t pardoned Nixon, he would have become prez by voters in 1976.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hard to believe but true.  We cannot let that happen again.  Are most Americans paying attention?  It seems they aren’t really.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SusanD –</p>
<p>I, too, want Bush GONE.  And Cheney.  But if they leave office, the GOP will put in someone else … who will becomes prez in 2008?</p>
<p>I distinctly recall when Nixon left office, and Ford became prez.  Most seemed to think that if Ford hadn’t pardoned Nixon, he would have become prez by voters in 1976.</p>
<p>Hard to believe but true.  We cannot let that happen again.  Are most Americans paying attention?  It seems they aren’t really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Schacht</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636479</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Schacht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/19/a-mutiny-on-the-potomac/#comment-636479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-636310&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;aReader @&lt;br /&gt;
                120              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember report a few weeks ago of US Generals that would resign in mass if Bush invaded Iran?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, George Tenet’s book will be out April 30th:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Allies say the 511-page book-300,000 in the first printing-isn’t a rant: Tenet spent a year and a half researching it, reviewed tens of thousands of documents, and conducted dozens of interviews with key players to fill in the gaps of his story, the first by a true Bush insider involved in making war policy.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.R. rollout includes a rare two-segment 60 Minutes appearance.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/articles/070401/9whisplead_print.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/p....._print.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Book will not be kind to Bush/Cheney/Rice:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003571875&quot;&gt;http://www.editorandpublisher......1003571875&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right. This is good because it will help put the spotlight back on Cheney, who must be impeached first. Maybe it will give Fitzgerald something more to work with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-636310"><em>aReader @<br />
                120              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Remember report a few weeks ago of US Generals that would resign in mass if Bush invaded Iran?</p>
<p>Also, George Tenet’s book will be out April 30th:</p>
<p>“Allies say the 511-page book-300,000 in the first printing-isn’t a rant: Tenet spent a year and a half researching it, reviewed tens of thousands of documents, and conducted dozens of interviews with key players to fill in the gaps of his story, the first by a true Bush insider involved in making war policy.”</p>
<p>P.R. rollout includes a rare two-segment 60 Minutes appearance.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/articles/070401/9whisplead_print.htm">http://www.usnews.com/usnews/p&#8230;.._print.htm</a></p>
<p>Book will not be kind to Bush/Cheney/Rice:<br />
<a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003571875">http://www.editorandpublisher&#8230;&#8230;1003571875</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Right. This is good because it will help put the spotlight back on Cheney, who must be impeached first. Maybe it will give Fitzgerald something more to work with.</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
