<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ombudswho?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:01:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: weewinkie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-626747</link>
		<dc:creator>weewinkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-626747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I apologize if someone’s already made this point:  on top of everything else, the column was terrible.  It was a discussion of gambling by sportwriters, and began by assuming, if it’s bad when athletes do it, why isn’t it equally bad when reporters do it.  There was no analysis whatsoever of that false comparison.  Ugh.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize if someone’s already made this point:  on top of everything else, the column was terrible.  It was a discussion of gambling by sportwriters, and began by assuming, if it’s bad when athletes do it, why isn’t it equally bad when reporters do it.  There was no analysis whatsoever of that false comparison.  Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqrat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-626060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-626060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;She looks so damned &lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;creepy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks so damned <em><b>creepy</b></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff Spaceman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-626043</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff Spaceman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-626043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m just glad to see that she and Thurston got off the island. Certainly her columns haven’t been up to speed but I hear she has a computer made of coconuts and bamboo.  “Lovey” will no doubt soon be back up to speed and won’t even notice those awful people who might make one uncomfortable in one’s personal space.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m just glad to see that she and Thurston got off the island. Certainly her columns haven’t been up to speed but I hear she has a computer made of coconuts and bamboo.  “Lovey” will no doubt soon be back up to speed and won’t even notice those awful people who might make one uncomfortable in one’s personal space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwrnligq</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625819</link>
		<dc:creator>jwrnligq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lovey Howell is worse than useless as an ombudsman and when I leave a comment about her column I usually try to be subtle while jib-jabbing her but I &lt;b&gt;REALLY DO&lt;/b&gt; want to know who at The Post was enjoying the services provided by the D.C. Madam. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If instead of providing the service as ombudsman everyone expects she’s going to pull something out of her ass at the last minute Friday night and hope nobody notices, she may as well pretend she works at The Enquirer and tell us who’s fucking whom and how much they had to pay for it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m &lt;b&gt;STILL&lt;/b&gt; waiting for that wench to do a follow-up column about Democratic Congressmen who were tangled up in the Abramoff scandal. Fortunately, I haven’t been holding my breath.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovey Howell is worse than useless as an ombudsman and when I leave a comment about her column I usually try to be subtle while jib-jabbing her but I <b>REALLY DO</b> want to know who at The Post was enjoying the services provided by the D.C. Madam. </p>
<p>If instead of providing the service as ombudsman everyone expects she’s going to pull something out of her ass at the last minute Friday night and hope nobody notices, she may as well pretend she works at The Enquirer and tell us who’s fucking whom and how much they had to pay for it. </p>
<p>I’m <b>STILL</b> waiting for that wench to do a follow-up column about Democratic Congressmen who were tangled up in the Abramoff scandal. Fortunately, I haven’t been holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625804</link>
		<dc:creator>larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Little Debby, Little Debby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One to many snack crackers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good week ahead, thing good thoughts for the change needed. :grin:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little Debby, Little Debby.</p>
<p>One to many snack crackers. </p>
<p>Good week ahead, thing good thoughts for the change needed. :grin:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625792</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-625603&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TeddySanFran @&lt;br /&gt;
                61              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;fine letters, MPoodle and bmaz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deb is a full-throated adherent to the school of journamilizm that sez “if both sides are complaining, we’re doing our job &lt;em&gt;exactly&lt;/em&gt; right.”  When she acribes complaints to liberal bloggers, or even worse, to those prompted by liberal bloggers, it makes me see red. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I was a dedicated WaPo reader (having it delivered to my remote New England college dorm during Watergate) long before I started taking orders from Jane &amp; Christy.  Why Deb finds it necessary to ascribe motive and persuasion to her paper’s READERS escapes me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I TRUSTED THE POST LONG BEFORE THERE WAS EVEN AN INTERNET USED BY THE UNIVERSITIES!  Blogging has nothing to do with it. What she doesn’t want to admit is that the content and editorial position of the post, based purely in fact=free decision-making had trredeemably made the Post a clone of the Washington Times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once it was a respected and trusted source of information that you knew would be carefully fact-checked by the editors. Nowadays the WH taking points are more likrly to find their ways (leaked of course) onto their front pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-625603"><em>TeddySanFran @<br />
                61              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>fine letters, MPoodle and bmaz.</p>
<p>Deb is a full-throated adherent to the school of journamilizm that sez “if both sides are complaining, we’re doing our job <em>exactly</em> right.”  When she acribes complaints to liberal bloggers, or even worse, to those prompted by liberal bloggers, it makes me see red. </p>
<p> I was a dedicated WaPo reader (having it delivered to my remote New England college dorm during Watergate) long before I started taking orders from Jane &amp; Christy.  Why Deb finds it necessary to ascribe motive and persuasion to her paper’s READERS escapes me.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I TRUSTED THE POST LONG BEFORE THERE WAS EVEN AN INTERNET USED BY THE UNIVERSITIES!  Blogging has nothing to do with it. What she doesn’t want to admit is that the content and editorial position of the post, based purely in fact=free decision-making had trredeemably made the Post a clone of the Washington Times.</p>
<p>Once it was a respected and trusted source of information that you knew would be carefully fact-checked by the editors. Nowadays the WH taking points are more likrly to find their ways (leaked of course) onto their front pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625785</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625785</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-625598&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eli @&lt;br /&gt;
                56              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Deb is more of an Ombutthead, really.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Her role is equivalent to that of Tony Snow or Scotty McClellan…a spokesperson rather than an ombudsman!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-625598"><em>Eli @<br />
                56              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Deb is more of an Ombutthead, really.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Her role is equivalent to that of Tony Snow or Scotty McClellan…a spokesperson rather than an ombudsman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625782</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 03:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-625595&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;TeddySanFran @&lt;br /&gt;
                53              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-625581&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;eCAHNomics @&lt;br /&gt;
                40              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-625579&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;cleter @ 38&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Except for Froomkin, the Washington Post is dead to me. Feh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t forget Dana Priest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And E.J. and Eugene.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And sometimes Shailagh. And Peter and Jonathan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One person with a bit of cash could create their own paper a strip the WashPo of every semblance of believability in less than it costs to pay one average major league baseball player.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-625595"><em>TeddySanFran @<br />
                53              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-625581"><em>eCAHNomics @<br />
                40              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-625579"><em>cleter @ 38</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Except for Froomkin, the Washington Post is dead to me. Feh.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Don’t forget Dana Priest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And E.J. and Eugene.</p>
<p>And sometimes Shailagh. And Peter and Jonathan.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One person with a bit of cash could create their own paper a strip the WashPo of every semblance of believability in less than it costs to pay one average major league baseball player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625758</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This woman is useless. I mean, this is just flat out embarrassing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This woman is useless. I mean, this is just flat out embarrassing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtoph3r</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625738</link>
		<dc:creator>xtoph3r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/15/ombudswho/#comment-625738</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can we start calling her the &lt;em&gt;Ombudsmoker&lt;/em&gt;, you know, because she is so obviously stoned?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we start calling her the <em>Ombudsmoker</em>, you know, because she is so obviously stoned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
