has the definitive knockdown on US Atty Biskupic’s Saturday’s statement reacting to news that he is listed on the DoJ hitlist document.

The man is no political monk.
-

Sunday, April 15, 2007; B07

My decision some months ago to privately seek the resignations of a small number of U.S. attorneys has erupted into a public firestorm. First and foremost, I appreciate the public service of these fine lawyers and dedicated professionals, each of whom served his or her full four-year term as U.S. attorney. I apologize to them, their families and the thousands of dedicated professionals at the Justice Department for my role in allowing this matter to spin into an undignified Washington spectacle…

[Mod Note; To help keep the FDL servers running smoothly and to avoid any copyright issues, please post an excerpt and a link instead of a full article. Thank you.]

Nothing Improper

Question on the restoration of public faith in the rule of law: is there any practical possibility that Patrick Fitzgerald might be asked to head the cleanout of the Augean Stable? And if he were, and he agreed to become AG, would he be able to accomplish it?

It seems as though he’s one of the few with the standing to carry both parties (Bushites excepted).

Don’t count of Fitz to do jackshit. He knew or should have known about the destroyed emails for more than a year.

Back in February of 2006, I reported on the Plame-gate prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s efforts to resist Scooter Libby’s demand for production of all the documents that Fitzgerald had reviewed, including highly classified documents. Scooter’s lawyers claim to need the documents to fight charges of perjury and lying to the FBI.

A (New York) Daily News article at the time said, “Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby’s request, said in a letter to Libby’s lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney’s office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.”

You can read the post at “Nixon blamed his secretary, Rosemary Woods. Who will Cheney blame?”

Please visit the Schapira blog, “What we know so far …

“… and tell ’em Big Mitch sent ya!”

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1235

-ck- @ 37

When The Texas Blueprint for the Stolen Election was published in late 2002, I only received one email in response:

Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:52:19 -0500
From: “Rob Joseph”

Subject: Texas Blueprint for the Stolen Election

Dear Mr. Knutson,

I read your article titled ‘Texas Blueprint for the Stolen Election’ and want to thank you for an excellent synopsis.

I am curious though, given that it’s obvious that the illegal RNC tactics cost the DNC the Presidency, what is the DNC doing about it?

I know you are very busy but I am really concerned about this and if you can carve out a moment to reply, I would be most grateful to you.

With deep respect,

Rob Joseph

Note the formal and solicitous tone of the email, and the curiosity about the DNC.

This was sent from a simplifyandconnect.com email account; a follow up email 6 months later was from a prepaidlegal.com email account, which is associated with the simplify and connect website.

The significance of this? Robert Joseph was on the NSC staff, and was responsible for the 16 words on Niger yellowcake in the SOTU speech.

I bring this up, because it suggests the Karl Rove Krew used a variety of email accounts, beyond the RNC and gwb43.com.

You mean all these?

http://www.robtex.com/dns/gwb43.com.html

The Robtex link at the bottom of your post is amazing. This is fertile info. Various sites are really buried in layers. Thank you.

I think we need to demand that all WH employees who used RNC accounts should return all monies paid to them from taxpayer dollars. The RNC should pay them since it appears they are working for the RNC rather than for the people of the USofA. I want my money back. Just think get those tax dollars back and use it to help the soldiers who have been injured in Iraq.

If Ken Lay is dead I’m santa.

Ken Lay lives!

…with Elvis