<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortune Favors The Bold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:44:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesterfox</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesterfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read it as “Withhold funding until Bush &lt;b&gt;resigns&lt;/b&gt;: 45%”. Damn, I wish that were true!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it as “Withhold funding until Bush <b>resigns</b>: 45%”. Damn, I wish that were true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pluege</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624262</link>
		<dc:creator>pluege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Use of “Fortune Favors the Bold” here is very sloppy for there is an essential, critically important element missing. The democratic boldness is being rewarded ONLY because the democrats are doing WHAT IS RIGHT. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It could easily be argued that bush and that maggot cheney, scum-of-the-Earth rumsfeld, and the rest of the sacks of crap of the bushliar-criminal regime have been extremely bold. But they have be wrong, dishonest, and deceitful IN EVERYTHING they do. Hopefully their reward will be multiple life prison sentences each.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of “Fortune Favors the Bold” here is very sloppy for there is an essential, critically important element missing. The democratic boldness is being rewarded ONLY because the democrats are doing WHAT IS RIGHT. </p>
<p>It could easily be argued that bush and that maggot cheney, scum-of-the-Earth rumsfeld, and the rest of the sacks of crap of the bushliar-criminal regime have been extremely bold. But they have be wrong, dishonest, and deceitful IN EVERYTHING they do. Hopefully their reward will be multiple life prison sentences each.<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowedin06</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624232</link>
		<dc:creator>snowedin06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been enjoying watching the sputtering from the various DLC mouthpieces this past week.  The DLC still has as their lead piece on their website regarding Iraq that if Bush vetoes the appropriation bill, the Democrats should immediately cave and “quickly pass a short-term and clean supplemental appropriations bill”.  But it seems every time they float this one, it elicits a stream of invective from regular folks from the rank and file.  How dare voters think they can influence policy!  Just delicious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=131&amp;subid=192&amp;contentid=254240&quot;&gt;http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm.....tid=254240&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been enjoying watching the sputtering from the various DLC mouthpieces this past week.  The DLC still has as their lead piece on their website regarding Iraq that if Bush vetoes the appropriation bill, the Democrats should immediately cave and “quickly pass a short-term and clean supplemental appropriations bill”.  But it seems every time they float this one, it elicits a stream of invective from regular folks from the rank and file.  How dare voters think they can influence policy!  Just delicious.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=131&amp;subid=192&amp;contentid=254240">http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm&#8230;..tid=254240</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624113</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-623915&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fern @ 118 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-623876&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;kathleen @ 117&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know this is a sensitive subject but why is it that A*P*C without the *’s sets off the filters?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering if this is why the old blog at the David Corn website was attacked when discussion about the lobby and the I/P conflict would be discussed.   Trolls hit the site so hard that it shut down and Corn never restored it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there other words that set off the filters?&lt;br /&gt;
Who is it that attacks sites if the A word is used?  Can attacks be investigated?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought this had been explained to you before.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clear explanation, and polite answer. My question was both polite and respectful and this is the  way you answer?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am trying to talk several professors (Prof Gifford Doxsee (in his 80’s) who taught middle eastern studies here at Ohio Univ for 30 years ,served in WWII and was in prison with Kurt Vonnegut at Dresden , Professor Whealey a history professor here at O.U who is also in his 80’s, and a friend Haroon from Afghanistan and  who is studying for his Masters in Cocommunications here at Ohio university) into spending sometime here at Firedoglake in  the conversations. We meet often to discuss politics, history and Religion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I was talking  to them about your site and the “polite” dialogue and links, I had also mentioned the filtering system. They were all very interested in this, and I could not explain it very well ( I am not a computer person and either are they).  I brought up that when you write out the A term or b j spelled out that it automatically trips the filters (is the way to explain it?))  But the word fuck word does not trip) the filters.  If I am explaining this to them correctly they found this fascinating and mysterious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would really like to get them on board on your site, and will share with them your earlier and hopefully more clear explanation of how the filtering system works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I know you folks work hard and I truely appreciate what you do.  But Whether you can admit it or not,( and I know you can not) your snotty response was uncalled for.  If FDL’ers want people to come to this site that may not always fully agree or are not always on the same page being more polite when someone ask a sincere question that they are obviously not clear about would be well worth your while.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will share your response and hopefully clearer explanation about the filter than mine with the above mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-623915"><em>Fern @ 118 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-623876"><em>kathleen @ 117</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I know this is a sensitive subject but why is it that A*P*C without the *’s sets off the filters?  </p>
<p>I am wondering if this is why the old blog at the David Corn website was attacked when discussion about the lobby and the I/P conflict would be discussed.   Trolls hit the site so hard that it shut down and Corn never restored it.  </p>
<p>Are there other words that set off the filters?<br />
Who is it that attacks sites if the A word is used?  Can attacks be investigated?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought this had been explained to you before.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the clear explanation, and polite answer. My question was both polite and respectful and this is the  way you answer?</p>
<p>I am trying to talk several professors (Prof Gifford Doxsee (in his 80’s) who taught middle eastern studies here at Ohio Univ for 30 years ,served in WWII and was in prison with Kurt Vonnegut at Dresden , Professor Whealey a history professor here at O.U who is also in his 80’s, and a friend Haroon from Afghanistan and  who is studying for his Masters in Cocommunications here at Ohio university) into spending sometime here at Firedoglake in  the conversations. We meet often to discuss politics, history and Religion.</p>
<p>When I was talking  to them about your site and the “polite” dialogue and links, I had also mentioned the filtering system. They were all very interested in this, and I could not explain it very well ( I am not a computer person and either are they).  I brought up that when you write out the A term or b j spelled out that it automatically trips the filters (is the way to explain it?))  But the word fuck word does not trip) the filters.  If I am explaining this to them correctly they found this fascinating and mysterious.</p>
<p>I would really like to get them on board on your site, and will share with them your earlier and hopefully more clear explanation of how the filtering system works.</p>
<p> I know you folks work hard and I truely appreciate what you do.  But Whether you can admit it or not,( and I know you can not) your snotty response was uncalled for.  If FDL’ers want people to come to this site that may not always fully agree or are not always on the same page being more polite when someone ask a sincere question that they are obviously not clear about would be well worth your while.  </p>
<p>I will share your response and hopefully clearer explanation about the filter than mine with the above mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McGiffert</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624073</link>
		<dc:creator>David McGiffert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 03:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I want to know more about Blackwater and other private&lt;br /&gt;
contractors in Iraq that supposedly number&lt;br /&gt;
over 100,000. Whose army is that?&lt;br /&gt;
What is their mission and what is their “timetable”?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know more about Blackwater and other private<br />
contractors in Iraq that supposedly number<br />
over 100,000. Whose army is that?<br />
What is their mission and what is their “timetable”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knut Wicksell</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624014</link>
		<dc:creator>Knut Wicksell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-624014</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is one very good piece of news in this news.  The American people are accepting defet in Iraq.  They haven’t yet accepted the implications of that defeat, because they do not know yet how total it is, both tactically and strategically.  But it’s a first step.  And it’s encouraging, because we are going to have to live with this disaster for the rest of my natural life (30 years or so).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one very good piece of news in this news.  The American people are accepting defet in Iraq.  They haven’t yet accepted the implications of that defeat, because they do not know yet how total it is, both tactically and strategically.  But it’s a first step.  And it’s encouraging, because we are going to have to live with this disaster for the rest of my natural life (30 years or so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fern</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623915</link>
		<dc:creator>Fern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623915</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-623876&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;kathleen @ 117&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know this is a sensitive subject but why is it that A*P*C without the *’s sets off the filters?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering if this is why the old blog at the David Corn website was attacked when discussion about the lobby and the I/P conflict would be discussed.   Trolls hit the site so hard that it shut down and Corn never restored it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there other words that set off the filters?&lt;br /&gt;
Who is it that attacks sites if the A word is used?  Can attacks be investigated?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought this had been explained to you before.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-623876"><em>kathleen @ 117</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I know this is a sensitive subject but why is it that A*P*C without the *’s sets off the filters?  </p>
<p>I am wondering if this is why the old blog at the David Corn website was attacked when discussion about the lobby and the I/P conflict would be discussed.   Trolls hit the site so hard that it shut down and Corn never restored it.  </p>
<p>Are there other words that set off the filters?<br />
Who is it that attacks sites if the A word is used?  Can attacks be investigated?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought this had been explained to you before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KestrelBrighteyes</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623900</link>
		<dc:creator>KestrelBrighteyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623900</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Egads. This is the third time in two weeks that I have been mistaken for a troll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nobody thinks my jokes are funny. Not my wife. Not my chldren. Not my students.&lt;br /&gt;
And I so much wanted to follow in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/contributors/bio.php?nick=matt-cooper&amp;name=Matt Cooper&quot;&gt;Matt Cooper’s&lt;/a&gt; footsteps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob - I thought it was hilarious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But then, I AM on my third glass of wine….&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Egads. This is the third time in two weeks that I have been mistaken for a troll.</p>
<p>Nobody thinks my jokes are funny. Not my wife. Not my chldren. Not my students.<br />
And I so much wanted to follow in <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/contributors/bio.php?nick=matt-cooper&amp;name=Matt Cooper">Matt Cooper’s</a> footsteps.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bob &#8211; I thought it was hilarious.</p>
<p>But then, I AM on my third glass of wine….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623876</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623876</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know this is a sensitive subject but why is it that A*P*C without the *’s sets off the filters?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering if this is why the old blog at the David Corn website was attacked when discussion about the lobby and the I/P conflict would be discussed.   Trolls hit the site so hard that it shut down and Corn never restored it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there other words that set off the filters?&lt;br /&gt;
Who is it that attacks sites if the A word is used?  Can attacks be investigated?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a sensitive subject but why is it that A*P*C without the *’s sets off the filters?  </p>
<p>I am wondering if this is why the old blog at the David Corn website was attacked when discussion about the lobby and the I/P conflict would be discussed.   Trolls hit the site so hard that it shut down and Corn never restored it.  </p>
<p>Are there other words that set off the filters?<br />
Who is it that attacks sites if the A word is used?  Can attacks be investigated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/04/14/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623847</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/13/fortune-favors-the-bold/#comment-623847</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-623805&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bob Schacht @ 113&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-623666&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;selise @&lt;br /&gt;
                88              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-623643&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bob Schacht @ 71&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I don’t understand why you guys are so obsessed with a possible military strike.&lt;br /&gt;
Just look at a topographic map of Iran. It would be a cakewalk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To this last comment, my mouth drops open in astonishment. Surely, this is one who is ignorant. I’ve been there, from Tabriz in the north, to Ahwaz in the south. Just what is it that you see in a glance at a topographic map that leads you to believe that a military strike would be a cakewalk?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our armed forces are at the breaking point now. A military strike on Iran just might provide the last bit of idiocy needed to complete the break.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bob, don’t panic. i’m quite sure that comment was sarcasm. … just wanted to reassure you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I’m snark-impaired. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bob in HI&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-623805"><em>Bob Schacht @ 113</em></a><br />
<a href="#comment-623666"><em>selise @<br />
                88              </em></a><br />
<a href="#comment-623643"><em>Bob Schacht @ 71</em></a><br />
I don’t understand why you guys are so obsessed with a possible military strike.<br />
Just look at a topographic map of Iran. It would be a cakewalk.</p>
<p>To this last comment, my mouth drops open in astonishment. Surely, this is one who is ignorant. I’ve been there, from Tabriz in the north, to Ahwaz in the south. Just what is it that you see in a glance at a topographic map that leads you to believe that a military strike would be a cakewalk?</p>
<p>Our armed forces are at the breaking point now. A military strike on Iran just might provide the last bit of idiocy needed to complete the break.</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
<p>bob, don’t panic. i’m quite sure that comment was sarcasm. … just wanted to reassure you.</p>
<p>Sorry, I’m snark-impaired. :-)</p>
<p>Bob in HI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.481 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-15 18:03:45 -->

