
Firedoglake is pleased to announce that Andrew Cockburn will join us on Book Salon this coming Sunday, April 8, to discuss his new book, Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy. Many of you know Cockburn as a respected journalist and author of several books including (with Patrick Cockburn) the highly acclaimed Out of the Ashes: The Resurrection of Saddam Hussein. I'm about half way through Rumsfeld and I'm convinced Cockburn's new book on Rumsfeld is headed for at least equal acclaim.
Cockburn's Rumsfeld is a fascinating, highly readable book, not only for the focus on Rumsfeld's disastrous role in the Iraq invasion and occupation and his lifelong ambition to be President -- staggers the mind, doesn't it? -- but for the perspective it provides on the Administrations of Nixon, Ford and Bush 41 -- and ultimately Bush 43. Here we meet the officials who emerged in those early years and then disappeared, only to be resurrected and empowered in their most extreme forms in the Bush 43 regime.
After summarizing Rumsfeld's early terms in Congress and his stint at the Office of Economic Opportunity, Cockburn relates how WH Chief of Staff Rumsfeld brought in the young Dick Cheney to help run the Ford White House, allowing Rumsfeld to focus on his Machiavellian schemes to get Ford to dump Rockefeller as his Vice President. That scheme, which also required that his rival, G.H.W. Bush be sidelined by sending him to head the CIA, was aimed at getting Ford to select Rumsfeld as his VP in 1976. That would give Ford a conservative shield against the rise of Ronald Reagan. The scheme derailed Rockefeller and for the moment, Bush Sr., but it failed to get Rumsfeld the VP nod. But while Rockefeller got his revenge, the episode probably marked the turning point in the disappearance of the moderate wing of the Republican Party.
One by one, Cockburn introduces the key members of the neocon team -- Wolfowitz, Perle, Cambone, Paul Nitze and others. Here we learn about the origins of the Committee for the Present Danger, the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, and the Project for the New American Century. And guess what they were doing in these earlier decades? Not much; just doing whatever they could to scare Americans into higher defense budgets and a more belligerent military and foreign policy -- like making up bogus intelligence analysis to convince Congress to commit billions of dollars building expensive weapons systems we didn't need and that didn't work as advertised to confront a Soviet threat that turned out to be grossly exaggerated. The methods are familiar: with only a little effort, we could substitute 2001-03 for what Cockburn describes happened in 1976:
Clearly, there was much work still to be done. One of the problems was the CIA, which persisted in reporting that the Soviets were by no means as formidable as claimed by the Pentagon. To correct this state of affiars, the alarmists lobbied vigorously for a reconsideration of the CIA conclusions by an "independent" group. In May 1976, newly installed CIA director Goerge H.W. Bush agreed, and "Team B," codirected by Nitze, was in business. Among it's senior staff members was an affable young defense intellectual out of the University of Chicago named Paul Wolfowitz, who had gotten his start in the national security world when hired by Nitze to lobby for missile defense in 1969. Now he joined his fellow team members in rummaging through the agency's classified files, sniffing out neglected evidence of Soviet perfidy.Predictably, given its staff and sponsors, the team's final report duly endorsed the wildest speculations of the right-wing defense lobby.
"Team B" of course became the model for Doug Feith who made the news just this morning, and the Office of Special Plans, another rump group set up 25 years later in Rumsfeld's DoD shop to manufacture phony analysis from raw intelligence deliberately misread by men who already knew the answer they wanted and were determined to present it to decision makers. And Cockburn notes they never skipped a beat when the Soviet Union collasped and the Russian bear was no longer a threat. Instead, by 1998 "the principal threats were North Korea, iran, and Iraq -- the trio that would later be notoriously labeled the 'axis of evil.'" And the global war on terror filled in quite well for the missing communist under every bed.
In addition to Rumsfeld's early government history, there's also a disturbing chapter on the period in the late 70s and early 80's when, with Jimmy Carter now President, Rumsfeld left government to join the pharmaceutical company G.D. Searle and became its president and CEO. The chapter focuses on Searle's efforts to win FDA approval of aspartame, which you know as the artificial sweetners NutraSweet and Equal. It seems the problem was that Searle was suspected of misreporting and then covering up tests which showed a possible connection with increased incidences of brain tumors in rats. Rumsfeld's role was in getting FDA to reverse its initial assessment and grant approval. The drug didn't change, nor did the test results; what changed was the politics. Searle would eventually arrange a bogus hearing and politicized approval in 1981 by Reagan's new FDA administrator, Arthur Hull Hayes. That travesty was followed by getting Senator Howell Heflin (D-Ala) to insert an obscure provision in legislation that granted Searle an extension of its expiring patent on aspartame. And it gets worse. You'll want to read this chapter carefully. Everyone who wants to know what's wrong with conservatives in government should read this book just for this chapter. And after you do, you may never again use anything with NutraSweet or Equal, or trust FDA.
History, of course, repeats itself in many ways, and in Rumsfeld, we get a chilling warning during the Searle era of what happens when US Attorneys are continuously cycled from the Justice Department to private law firms who, it just so happens, were representing the very companies they were asked to prosecute for fraud. One by one, a succession of US Attorneys joined the law firm that was representing Searle, or left for other reasons, with the result that no case was every presented to a Grand Jury. Sound familiar?
That's just a peak at snippets in the first half of the book, which I can't wait to get back to. Get the book. (You can order here.) Read it. But no matter what, please join us for Sunday's Book Salon to meet and chat with the author, Andrew Cockburn. See you then.
UPDATE: Many thanks to Selise, who found these interviews of Cockburn on Rummy: truthdig and Democracy Now.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Fitz!
Waxman!
Christy!
Jane!
Good morning, Scarecrow.
Good morning!
OK, you’ve convinced me. Off to B&N I go…
Scarecrow!
Swopa!
Christy!
FDL Crew in general!
Marcy!
Jane!
FDL’s upcoming Pulitzer Prize!!!
Good morning all. How’s your day? Winter finally gave up and its Spring-warm today.
Off to get some hot chocolate; back in a few.
Sounds like one to pick up.
Happy Good Friday to all our X-Tians.
Here’s some Blasphemy. Feel free to email it to Bill Donohue, I could use the traffic.
I just got a chill looking at the picture.
What horrible team is this presidency fostering that we will have to wait 20 -30 years to find out their evil ways? UGH!!!!!
My apologies to Sens. Leahy & Schumer and Cong. Conyers- they are all making us proud to be Americans again. Should have been included in the above post.
Good Morning Eg and Scarecrow.
I have to read this book, sounds like the leopards have never changed their spots. Eisenhower was right in 1959 about the revolving door of the military-industrial complex.We have met the enemy and they are us(Them)
Fucking conspiritous criminals. All. Of. Them
Hi-ho, it’s off to work we go. (Thank all deities i’m employed)
I LOVE Alexander Cockburn!!!!
I had the pleasure and the priviledge to meet him several times in the 80s, and he is as ruthlessly honest as he is brilliant.
I hope I can make it here on Sun. Otherwise, I will read every single word written later.
It’s sick that all these neo-cons wanted was power. It’s sicker that they all made so much money because of their policies. Pearle, in my mind, is King Sicko.
But the idea that the President has such close ties to the oil industry, and the VP has such close ties to the arms industry, and that these guys our running our country into the ground so that these industries can have profits in the stratosphere is beyond sickness. They neo-conned America into borrowing trillions of dollars and putting it into their pockets and their friends’ pockets.
I think it was very accommodating for Doug Feith to get his mug shot in the WaPo this a.m. I wrote the post last night, and then checked the news this a.m. to see what’s up, and there he was. He’s so thoughtful, that guy.
And kudos to Senator Levin and the Dems for smoking this out and getting the Inspector General’s report declassified.
Woodhall Hollow @ 12
This is Andrew. Andrew has a brother, Alexander, who is also a journalist, and another brother, Patrick, with whom he co-wrote the last book. And Andrew’s wife, Leslie, co-authored another book with Andrew. Quite the talented family. According to wikipedia, they’re British, but now live in Washington D.C.
This is a stunning statement. And speaks to something that always niggled at me. When the Berlin Wall and the former Soviet Union collapsed (during the reign of Geo the Father, interestingly enough) fell, the meme was widely spread and embrace by everyone that “no one” had realized how bankrupt the Soviet military was….I could never figure out how the CIA didn’t know that. But that was the “myth” which was perpetrated, and has now become the standard story.
It also makes me wonder about the 1st Gulf War–and the strange role played by April Gillespie (sp?) in terms of her “nod” to Sadaam that he could go ahead and invade Kuwait. With the “threat” of the Soviet Union out of the way, they really needed to manufacture a new crisis in order to keep up with their goals vis a vis oil and guns and money.
Scarecrow @ 15
Oh sorry–the brother! Yes, it is a brilliant family. And they are indeed British, and have the accent to prove it.
As far as Searle goes, my first g-friends da worked as an executive at Searle before and during rummys’ tenure. His mood changed almost overnight to dark and morose. At the time we all wondered why, (I was 16) As time went on he told me why, rummy!!! He also told all fo us to stay away from aspartame!! I never touched it, never will.
Woodhall Hollow — it’s almost as though the ideologues don’t need a CIA, or wish it would just go away. They manufacture their own “intelligence” ” to fit their preconceived notions of what they want the lastest “enemy” to look like, and then peddle that over the objections of the professional intelligence community. What’s interesting is how often the CIA has been right, but ignored; then when they’re wrong, they’re taken seriously. Wonder if there is a scorecard somewhere, correlated to ideological blinders.
More corruption in Bushworld. This time, profiting from student loan programs in the Education Department.
Tap Duncan @ 18
Cockburn has lots more to the Searle story, especially about the follow up studies years later that showed an increases in human brain tumors. It’s really chilling.
There is no substitute for honest government officials who believe in what they’re doing; and nothing worse than dishonest officials who don’t.
Scarecrow @ 19
Actually, it is not that they don’t “need” the CIA, they don’t want it–because they don’t want to deal with any kind of “truth” other than that which they can manufacture and micro-manage.
Washington has become the Emerald City–except that the green is pea-green rather than emerald green–pea green being the color of envy and greed.
Rummy on Craig Ferguson:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5P6MLiKEJI
- Tom
This ought to be VERY good indeed.
Just reading this brief post, and noting all the familiar names in it — Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle — should in itself be a stunning rebuke to the mealy-mouthed maunderings of Karen Tumulty et al on how BushCo has somehow “betrayed” modern Republicanism, when in fact BushCo IS modern Republicanism.
The only real difference between Nixon and Bush, or Reagan and Bush, is this: Bush had a Republican Congress for most of his two terms in office, which enabled him to do all the things they could only wistfully dream of doing. (Remember how Nixon tried to shove Judge Carswell down our throats?)
Woodhall Hollow @
16
That would be April Glaspie. And yes, it was either deliberate and criminal baiting or rank incompetence — and with the Republicans, it’s often hard to tell where the criminality ends and the incompetence begins.
Tom @ 23
Now THAT is one of the funniest things I have ever seen, and deserves to go viral!!!!
Tom @ 23
That is hilarious! Thanks for the link.
I’m really looking forward to this. I knew nothing of the backstory before I started researching news in 2002 to try to understand what was happening. His work was one of the first I came across and back then, nobody would talk about PNAC in the media. I can remember the sudden feeling of panic for the future that I had when reading his work.
That would be April Glaspie. And yes, it was either deliberate and criminal baiting or rank incompetence — and with the Republicans, it’s often hard to tell where the criminality ends and the incompetence begins.
I would suggest that the criminality begins with the Bush elders and the incompetence ends with Bab’s spoiled rotten little boy king. It’s a saga which seems to echo the rise and fall of the Roman Empire–from Caesar to Calligula.
I listened to Cockburn on the radio the other day. According to Cockburn, GHWB holds a grudge against the senile madman to this day for his backstabbing in the 70’s.
Woodhall Hollow @
26
Too funny!
With more than 1.2 million views, i think it already has gone viral.
Phoenix Woman @ 24
I was even more naive back then than I am today, but I seem to recall there was a significant “moderate” wing of the Republicans that also served as a check on the wingnuts. Rumsfeld’s career not only spans the slow death of that wing but also seems to enable it, though Rummy himself, as portrayed by Cockburn, comes off as more ambitious than ideological. I can’t wait to finish the second half for Andrew’s insights.
It would be poetic justice if Cheney, Rummmy, and Bush end up being viewed by history as responsible for the disappearance of the Republican Party from the national scene.
Oh my goodness that’s a funny video.
Jeebus, guys, totally OT and I apologize. But we’ve got big trouble here in MN. Excerpt from today’s Star Tribune:
Okay, smart people, que pasa?
So,
according to the WaPo link above, one could say that the invasion of Iraq was a
Feith-based initiative?
here are a couple of recent interviews with Andrew Cockburn about his new book (truthdig, democracy now!) for your listening pleasure… and for an additional intro to the book for those who won’t be able to read it by sunday.
There will never be hellfire hot enough for Douglas Feith. He is right up there with the Torture Boys Yoo and Gonzo.
barbara — looks like the basis for another set of questions from Leahy/Conyers, and another letter to Gonzales. Good for the Star Tribune for picking up on this.
Barbara -
Josh/TPM is all over that story
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
Man, that’s a lot of f**kery. Can we say f**kery during the daytime?
The thought of a VP Rumsfeld gives me the shudders. It’s also interesting that these guys thought Reagan was a threat that needed to be shunted aside. That needs to get pointed out more.
cbl @ 40
Wow, is he ever all over it. GREAT coverage. Oh, sorry for yelling. Could I just say that I am so sick of these people?!
More on Paulose from TPM
selise @ 37
Thanks so much Selise — I’ve added those links in an update.
barbara @
42
I think we need a “primal scream” day, in which we all go outside at the same moment and yell at these jerks for about 10 minutes, followed by a mass phone in to Congress to remove the regime from office.
Scarecrow @
19
They put the CIA to the left of “left wing media” so they can ignore them too. It’s hard to know if they genuinely believe that Islam is going to conquer the world or if they’re just in it for the money.
I still don’t understand why we have the Department of Homeland Security. The CIA and the FBI had files on all the 9/11 terrorists. Sure, they screwed up, but why not just fix what was wrong with them instead of creating a huge bureaucratic sinkhole call DHS?
Scarecrow @ 45
I like this idea. What a great visual! National “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it any more” Day. Dunno about you, but I’m totally fed up with the silent scream thing. I think a lot lately about July 14, 1789. Liberte, egalite, fraternite anyone?
Unfortunately, Rumsfield and Cheney never disappeared.
To say that they did ignores all of their efforts at the Project for the New American Century, American Enterprise Inst, etc.
These soft–handed jack-booted thugs have been beating the drums of war all around us.
Almost no one heard.
barbara @
42
From the links, we learn this about Paulose:
Now which high DoJ official involved in the firings/replacements would have been attracted by “quoting Bible verses”?? Anyone wanna take the 5th?
I trust this book will have muchy to say about the OTHER Rumsfeld book by my old enemy Midge Decter.
Meanwhile. . .There’s no place like Noam!
Andrew Cockburn has been on CPSAN Q&A for the last few weeks talking about his new book. Watch it if you get the chance. It definetly worth your time.
Getting Cockburn (pronounced koe-burn) for the FDLbook Salon is another big score for FDL.
Three cheers for for Jane.
David Ehrenstein @ 50
Yep, Midge and husband Norman Podhoretz are there, part of the rearmament cabal that became the Coalition for a Democratic Majority.
Good Morning Scarecrow and Firedogs,
not to take anything away from Mr. Cockburn, but here is an oldie from Sidney Blumenthal providing some background material for those not able to get their hands on the book by Sunday :)
Mr. Blumenthal
my first thought upon reading it was heeyyy, these two punked Kissinger, GWB, and Rockefeller and no one sent up any flares ?!?!?
none of this can be attributed to ’sources’ - all of this was out there and yet of course, not a peep from our vaunted press corpse - I imagine Mr. Cockburn may have something to say on this as well
oooh, thanks Selise !
David Ehrenstein @ 50
Democracy promotion at home?
what a nice idea!
johnnywheaker @ 43
Has anyone done any background on the qualifications of Paulose? Other than her being good friends with Take 5 Goodling? Isn’t it amazing how far a loyalty oath will take you these days?
Morning everyone. Coffee…good. :)
GeorgeSimian @ 45
The key to the answer to this question lies in the writings of Leo Strauss, the “spiritual” god-father of this bunch. Also in a cynical reading of Plato’s republic, which lays out the idea that only the “best” should have power, and having that power they should weild it by controlling the masses with stories which disempower them. Particularly interesting is the use of religion in this respect. One thing is for certain–none of these people believe in anything beyond their own greed and desire for power and wealth.
Speaking of which–an awesome book for the FDL Book Salon would be Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire by Anne Norton. It is a must read if you really want to understand this bunch.
Fresh thread — had some news I needed to get up and out this morning. Rise and shine, and get it while it’s hot…
you know what?
the members of the pnac are sick maniacs and they are morons
Speaking of books: Another must read is American Theocracy by Kevin Phillips, which really lays out the historical background of the nexus between oil, religion and debt.
Liar, liar pants on fire. Gotta keep the 30% on board with the scam.
I hate these a-holes for the lives they took.
Leahy and Schumer are hot on the trail–they are now hounding the DOJ to turn over unredacted docs that describe the process taken to choose which attys to fire and those to retain. Perhaps Sampson’s files are in this group?
Woodhall Hollow @ 61
Whoops! Wrong thread!
Scarecrow @
19
almost? come on Scarecrow! they hate the CIA. look what they’ve done, and tried to do, to it just the past 6 years. i’m no great fan of the CIA but every time they’ve come up with something right fuckwad and his minions have gone ballistic.
Phoenix Woman @ 25
IIRC, doesn’t our friend Joe Wilson say that Glaspie was merely using standard diplospeak of the time & that any conclusions SH chose to draw were his own?
Wow– I just watched Alexander this weekend on cspan and then Andrew’s interview about this book last nite on Q&A on cspan.
How wonderful! Laura Flanders is also a member of this amazing and talented family.
angie @ 66
c-span’s podcast of q&a for this weekend ought to be posted later today - thanks for the heads up… i will make sure to give it a listen.
Shamalamadingdong @ 48
This is the most important take-home for me. The Cold War exaggerations & fear tactics were wet runs for the terrorist & WMDs story of the 00s. Nicaraugua was a wet test for other wingnut tactics, including role of relgious right, & was particularly dangerous because no one cared about Nicaraugua & they got to perfect their techniques & test how far they could go with no one watching.
IOW, they’ve been working diligently to usurp as much power as they can when they were both in & out of office. We weren’t watching carefully enough. Even with a massive D sweep in 08, they’ll still be around, plotting and testing for their next chance. Will we be smart enough to continue to expose them, even when they aren’t in power?
GeorgeSimian @
46
if i may offer a possible rationale:
Bush and Cheney were against formation of the DHS until the the day they figured out what a golden opportunity it was to control everybody that went into it. the light bulb went on when they realized they could undercut both the CIA and the FBI. from then on they were happy as clams. and we know just how well it has all worked out ……
selise @
54
Russ Feingold for President. Noam Chomsky for Secretary of State.
Woodhall Hollow (#57):
would that we had the best instead of fuckwad, cheneycakes, rumsfailed, wolfowitz, feith, etc ……..
Cockburn interview - 3 hours Book TV over at Cspan from last weekend, streaming now: http://www.booktv.org/feature/.....chedID=482
perris @ 59
Yes, and the amazing thing is: They are heading us right into WW III, any day now, without missing a beat.
IMPEACH!
IMPEACH!
with pots and pans into the street, as Molly Ivins said.
Cockburn is a hypocritical arse. He loves to skewer people on their hypocrisy, but refuses to address his own. Case in point: he published a scurrilous, inaccurate hit piece on Allen Ginsberg and would not allow anyone to respond in Ginsberg’s defense. It was one of the most outrageously corrupt acts of irresponsible journalism I’ve ever seen. His motive? Ginsberg wasn’t enough of a card-carrying Marxist to suit him, so Ginsberg must be denied membership in the radical lefty club. And who did more to change this country for the better? Ginsberg or Cockburn? Hmmmmm. Have to think about that one for a little bit. Not.
I don’t know much about Andrew and Patrick but I do have ‘too-much-information’ on father Claude and son Alexander. Both are demonstrable red fascists and that can be easily seen from their writings about
a) Claudes Stalinist rantings about Spain in 1937
b) Alex repeating as farce with the ‘Nasrallah’ circus.
So I reserve judgement on the other brothers but there is that cloud over Claude and Alexander.
Sorry to be a wet blanket - I ordered Marcies book yesterday and will check out Andrews.
I feel the same about Cockburn’s hit pieces on prominent leftists. In fact I wonder who funds these guys.
Still, he sometimes passes on real information.
Well, it’s about time! I’ve known about Rumsfeld, Bush I and Team B for many years through my research into the power origins of the Bush family and their history in the weapons trade (although Wolfowitz’ involvement is a new but unsurprising fact to me), and when I first heard Rumsfeld’s name mentioned in connection with the then-new Bush II administration and the pending Rumsfeld confirmation hearing, I tried to tip off various papers and officials about the history of Team B and my fears that Rumsfeld couldn’t be trusted. Most ignored me or asserted they had never heard of Team B, including Tom Teepen, the supposed liberal editorial editor at the Atlanta Constitution.
Then, when I saw the way the Iraq threat was being similarly inflated on flimsy grounds, I smelled another Team B production and tried again to raise the alarm. Again, nobody was interested in writing about it. So, we got Iraq.
I’m delighted that the story and the connection are finally being brought to light, alas too late, and fervently hope that this will finally prompt some consideration by the MSM of how this tactic has now been used, at least twice, to needlessly funnel hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money straight into the pockets of the military industrial complex, the only ones who benefited from either of these phony threats. After all, we now know that Saddam was no threat to us, and the Soviets at the time couldn’t even get bread to their people.
When will we ever learn? When will these bastards and their weapon-selling buddies ever get punished?
Another Rumsfeld/Pharma scandal concerns the Avian Flu remedy Tamiflu. The original patent for Tamiflu was owned by Gilead Pharmaceuticals at a time when its CEO was none other that Rummy himself. So it’s probably not a coincidence that the Bush administration has committed billions of dollars to stockpiliing Tamiflu, rather than look into other approaches to preventing viral infection.