The Washington Post ran a puff piece about Florida Congressman Adam Putnam, new head of the Republican Conference Committee, written by Congressional Reporter Lyndsey Layton:
The Florida Republican's new job is to jump on anything that makes Democrats look bad and exploit it for maximum effect. As chairman of the Republican Conference Committee, Putnam is the face and voice of House Republicans. His agenda: to aggressively display the flaws of the new majority, to convey the ideas of the Republicans, and to work his hardest to help his party win back the House in 2008.
Putnam's most famous "jump & exploit" was sounding the alarm when the new Speaker requested a giant airplane that included waterbeds, an open bar, three IMAX screens, and room for the entire San Francisco Pride Parade to march up and down the aisle bare-assed in leather chaps and feather boas. Except, of course, that SpeakerAir was, well — kinda made up. Adam Putnam later admitted to the Tampa Tribune that the truth did not matter:
It turns out there's no evidence Pelosi requested any such thing. A day after Snow's remarks, the nonpartisan House sergeant-at-arms released a written statement explaining that for security reasons he asked for a plane that could carry Pelosi nonstop to her home in San Francisco, a much longer distance than former Speaker Dennis Hastert, of Illinois, had to cover. Putnam now acknowledges he had no personal knowledge of any Pelosi request. He said he was commenting on an anonymously-sourced story in The Washington Times and additional coverage from CNN. "This was a classic case where the media got out in front of us," Putnam said. "Did we jump on it? Yes." And he is unapologetic about that. He calls the Pelosi plane story, whatever its legitimacy, "the first break [Republicans] have had from the media in driving our message since before the Mark Foley story broke."
Would the WaPo include Putnam's fictional "jump & exploit" in their profile? From Lyndsey's online chat:
Dunn Loring, Va.: Lyndsey: In your glowing profile of Adam Putnam today (gift citrus basket on the way!) why didn't you mention his gaff last month of accusing Pelosi of requesting a jumbo jet to travel back and forth to her district when no such request was made, where he later admitted he got the information from an article in another D.C. daily? Not to mention that he accepted a $1,000 donation from Mark Foley last year after Foley's troubles were known? Please tell me an editor deleted this from your story.
Lyndsey Layton: Dunn Loring, how did you know? The Pelosi plane was the original lede on that story and it was sliced from the final version because the editor felt the reference was dated.
Dated? Try "unflattering." When your entire story is about Adam Putnam's new role as the GOP's top aggressor, omitting SpeakerAir makes no sense. If readers are to evaluate future "jump & exploit" moves from Congressman Putnam, shouldn't we be reminded that his most famous move crashed and burned?



153 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
DELBERT!
Aloha.
Ooooh, zed. And I read the article before commenting!
TEDDY!
If this is any indication of how Putnam operates, I don’t think we have too much to worry about.
I’m sure he has plenty of mentors, though.
Gee, a ComPost editor puffing/blowing a Republic. Why, whoda thunk it?
Howdy Doody looking nimrod!
I was just thinking that we really haven’t heard much from the RNC, except for their e-mail servers! But I suspect they’ve been feeding the media on how inappropriate it was for Pelosi to be doing in Syria what a majority of the American people think we should be doing. Matt Lauer this a.m. was atrocious, as bad as CNN has been.
how is it them publicans is so much better at slangin this kinda mud than the dimcrats? could it have innythang to do with thar ownin the media outrite?
Removing the SpeakerAir story from the lede completely changes the article’s tone. The omission takes the article from a critical analysis of Putnam’s flawed jump-&-exploit (based on an unsourced Washington Times report) to a sycophantic and completely uncritical puff piece.
Why would a Washington Post editor want to do that?
Do you suppose sneaky Lyndsey got a buddy in Dunn Loring to submit a question about the article’s lack of focus on Putnam’s underhandedness? Perhaps there’s more layers in the WaPo chats than we know….
Yeah, we really need to stop mentioning Iraq when discussing Bush because, you know, it’s so dated.
hi buddy don! where ya been?
TeddySanFran @ 9
Could you actually be implying that there are possibly some REAL journalists at the ComPost? WOW! What a concept! It might even slow that breeze wafting from Kay Graham’s grave.
Actually I seem to remember a similar piece in the NYT a few weeks ago. It too waxed enthusiastic and glossed over the Pelosi plane story. Putnam also IIRC was one of those who got burned jumping to Rumsfeld’s defense just before Bush dumped him.
A lot is made of his youth and energy and much less on the fact that most of these attributes are expended on your standard right wing hackery.
With Bush’s JARs in the 30s, Republican programs and projects rejected and in tatters, I have to ask how is it that the corporate media continue to pump out this cheerleading bilge as if the Republicans had triumphed rather than being trounced in the last elections. And the only answer that I come up with is that corporations, media ones included, have cast their lot with the Republicans. At some point perhaps the media will turn on Bush but the Republicans are their party.
Cannot stand that baby-faced puke.
Just feed him some more K street lunches and dinners and whaddaya know? He’s already acting like Delay and he’ll soon look like Delay.
Shine on while you can.
I think Putnam is the very essence of rethugism today: lying about your opponents (Dems) is easier than and probably preferable to honestly exposing their hypocrisy, insecurity/lack-of-spine and mistakes (of which we’ve made plenty). Outright lying (about Pelosi’s air travel, about Kerry’s military record, about Osama’s schooling or surname, about Gore’s personal energy use, or whatever…) has won election after election for them, it has no burden of proof (other than repetition through innuendo), no standard of evidence (other than one’s ability to buy airtime) and, seemingly, no adverse consequences whatsoever. So why not?
One just hopes that one day Americans will come to see these people for what they are and destroy the rethug party altogether.
TeddySanFran @ 9
Interesting idea — suggests we haven’t heard the last of this. No one can believe the “outdated” excuse. When they want to, they dredge up Viet Nam era arguments.
Is it very naive of me to expect better from actual journalists?
When has it ever been OK to lie? Did I miss a memo?
“Dated.” I’ll try that when April 15th comes. Oh fiddle, filing a tax return is so dated, I think I’ll go to a movie instead.
I just feel bad for the real journalists. Being married to an ex-journalist, I see what it must be like to have done that and been in that world.
thanks to places like fdl for changing the nature of it all!
Remember Lee Atwater the late friend of Karl Rove? Supposedly he was repentent on his death bed and had many regrets including trashing Dukakis’s wife for political gain. I don’t know that his final sweet words kept him out of hell. Atwater died, but his spirit lives on in others. Mr. Putnam will lose no sleep about his methods…until he is about to die.
The Washington Times is owned by the Bush family’s good friend the Reverend Moon. Yes, that fellow who once annointed himself the new Jesus.
Mostly it seems the GOP has just refined the “dirty tricks” methodology employed by Haldeman and Erlichman and others in the Nixon White House.
OT but related to the prior thread: This mornng an LA Times article by Peter Spiegel contained a photocopy of a Jan. 2002 memo from the Pentagon’s No. 2 official, Paul Wolfowitz, to the Pentagon’s No. 3, Doug Feith:
This sounds to me like a direct order to “make shit up if have to.”
Teddy!
Scarecrow @ 7
Any way to track these kinds of shenanigans? Any regular ppathways that we could find out about & start harping on to embarrass the MSM? I’ve sent both Hatch-Lam stories to MTP, suggesting they do a Fact Check section about their prior show. That would promote the political debate, said I, because after getting caught a couple of times pols wouldn’t doit anymore. Only trying to play to his imaginary journalist pride.
1,478 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen TeddySanFran and the Firepup Patriots:
The exchange in Layton’s chat exposes once again the conscious bias of corporate media’s managers and editors…and, at the same time, the whole episode of the bogus Pelosi boondoggle illuminates, once again, the smear method of leak, launder and repeat that is the fascist propaganda machine. It’s what the new Nazis used to expose a spy and what continues to be used to place lies in the collective memory to be called up again when the time is right.
Geeze LouEEZE, the oligarchy is completely corrupt and so are the institutions that front for ‘em…time to start callin for investigations into pullin’ the licenses of all the networks and resuscitate the anti-trust laws and sic ‘em on the consolidated newspaper corporations.
Anyone wanna argue that we aren’t experiencing “friendly fascism”…I thought not.
KEEP THE FAITH AND LET’S DO IT TO THEM BEFORE THEY CAN DO IT TO US AGAIN!!
I did read Lyndsey’s chat today– she has appeared to be very much on the up and up in the short time she has been hosting– snarky at times, too. I thought it brave of her to come out and nail her editor with the “dated” editing and I wondered at the time how long she be able to chat/have a job.
Is this evidence of a quiet mea culpa coming from the editors?
dating . . .
“jump and exploit” . . .
Why do I keep thinking of Mark Foley?
Great post, TeddySF!
This is possibly the worst Ann Coulter quote ever, over at C&L.
Save for possible antisocial personality disorder, Our Lady of Genocide doesn’t show symptoms appropriate for involuntary psychiatric confinement.
(Involuntary confinement for antisocial personality disorder is generally known as “prison”.)
it’s called /prior restraint/ … and nice to see Lyndsey speaking out at least a little on her own …
“VP ‘liar liar pants on fire’ Cheney” …
I’m with angie 14 and Blub 15. This Howdy Doody character bears watching, as he could be a player down the road. Dangerous.
kirk murphy @ 28
Yes.
Scarecrow @ 31
you don’t have to look at her
Not only have we not heard the end of SpeakerAir, Scarecrow — I also think Putnam’s destined for an even quicker rise than we might otherwise expect. If the GOP House members’ indictments for Abramoff and Cunningham ever reach fruition, there will be a clear path to leadership for such as he.
I expect WaPo is keeping his name clean, since the “dated” excuse hardly flies: the House sergeant-at-arms ended the kerfuffle on February 8, less than two months ago.
Scarecrow @ 27
And just when you think she can go no lower…
Somebody needs to put that Coulter creature away forever.
She is lacking a soul, any semblance of humanity, or is quite possibly insane and a sociopath.
I cried reading that.
This is not free speech at all. It’s criminal.
Please– put her away.
angie @ 35
Maybe we can have a late-nite post in which we dig up every media person who ever invited her on and praised her — and start asking for them to denounce her. Start with Chris Matthews and the folks at CNN.
OT Monica says goodbye
“How did you know” he asked. She didn’t know. It’s entirely probable that any reporter today would omit such references, which was the point of the inquiry about how the omission was made.
Layton is off the hook for hackery as far as omitting the Speaker Air story but his seeming breezy acceptance of the omission suggests he’ll know better next time. Saving the editor thrusting hackery upon him by simply becomming one. Certainly such would be a good career move at the Post.
a little bird told my tinfoil hat that Bill (chocolate sweet Jesus) Donohoe was depicted unfairly in a South Park episode. Is it true is this not but another Easter gift or belated Fitzmas present?
lolo
Scarecrow @
27
I think I need another shower. Nasty a** b*tch. And I mean that purely in the pejorative sense.
I added “bare-assed in leather chaps” after reading Donita’s post today. To provide some continuity across threads.
Scarecrow @ 36
What kind of fuckery is this Ann Coulter?
TeddySanFran @ 41
We all need a little continuity these days ;)
Here’s an interesting thing: a Chinese labor rep in n DC trying to get US support for Chinese labor law improvements. Opposed — and apparently lobbying the Chinese govt — are WalMart, Google, GE and othrs who are benefitting from cheap Chnese labor. more here at Global Labor Strategies.h/t Truthout.
I am a bad ZIG creator sorry MODS
Hugh 13 — you are correct, this must be Adam Putnam Fortnight:
[requires TimesSelect for entire archived article]
TeddySanFran @ 41
Hee, hee! Excellent!
Forecaster Blasts Gore on Global Warming just came up at the NYT. However if you read the article, Gore is not mentioned.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponlin…..rence.html
Scarecrow @ 36
I’ll help. She needs to be banned from any major media outlet. I mean, it’s not enough that we have the cabal in DC ruining our standing/reputation in the world by their screeching, their actions and their lies– we have to have her running her maw, too?
Ta gueule Ann!
I am going to take a nice hot shower now.
TeddySanFran @ 41
Ann Coulter in bareass leather chaps and feather boas.
And so continuity is maintained.
And the demand for the invention of mind-bleach continues to grow.
http://www.pittsburghcitypaper…..=oid:25155
a great coulter smack down by a small paper in pittsburgh
Actually, this whole thing is even more hideous than it appears. I was talking to a lobbiest friend today.. US conservative lobbiests employed by the American Chamber of Commerce are actively lobbying individual deputies of the Chinese Congress (NPC) to propose amendments to weaken their executive branch’s pro-labor-rights-improvement law. In another words, American rethugs are lobbying in China AGAINST human rights reforms being pushed by the communist Chinese government, because that government is responding to pressure from its perception of its own obligations under international law, international pressure (from Europe, American Dems/Unions etc) and domestic NGOs! To clarify: the Party of Pure Evil is attempting to export their Evil to the Evil Empire, because the Evil Empire isn’t evil enough for them.
HotFlash @
44
As for Coulter….Could this finally be the thing that turns her radioactive, at least among what is left of the mainstream media?
-GSD
She’s going to have one lonely life one of these days.
sorry.. typo points in #52: “The clarify = To Clarify” and “to export to their” = “to export their”
Hugh @ 48
Sounds like anemail to public@nytimes.com is warranted.
FYI…….PBS – Moyers on America – the Abramoff/Rove/Norquist story – 2 hours – on now (in Texas)
It’d be nice if Lyndsey Layton would give us the name of that editor of hers…
On another front, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of RI continues to shine:
Courtesy of Bob Geiger:
http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/…..ngold.html
As somebody who lives in Putnam’s district, I am well aware of his crash and burn and didn’t need to read a puff piece about him to forget it!
I just hope that somebody runs against him in 2008!
Reminder just in from Howie Klein: Tomorrow’s Blue America chat, at a SPECIAL EARLY TIME, is with New York Congressman Jerry Nadler. Howie just got off the phone with Congressman Nadler, and he is real excited about our chat tomorrow morning. So — remember:
11am EASTERN, 8am PACIFIC time,
BlueAmerica chat with New York Congressman Jerry Nadler.
Hugh @
48
Hugh, the link you gave does mention Gore.
Are we reading the same article? Gore’s name appears 3 times in the article linked. There’s no direct quote from Gore, but the context makes it clear which widely referenced Gore positions are being addressed. I completely disagree with this rethug’s doubter-of-the-week, but I don’t have an editorial problem with the article here.
eCAHNomics @
55
hungrycoyote @ 58
Commenters at WaPo claim Putnam’s in a jerrymandered district. Can a populist Democrat run and win? It’s important to challenge the party leadership at home every two years — last year, Speaker Hastert’s radioactivity kept him at home and off the road, perhaps resulting in a couple of wins for Democrats. Could we mount a challenge to Putnam?
Oooh Teddy. Good ost.
MEET THE TRUTH
Orrin Hatch’s blatant smear on US Attorney Carol Lam is basically what Hatch used to save himself from total embarrassment on Tim Russert’s Meet the Press last week.
See http://thinkprogress.org/2007/…..ction-mtp/
Hatch was going down hard. Russert letting Hatch get away with this just sends a message to other Republicans – when your lifeboat is sinking on this show throw the truth overboard.
Suggest everyone email Russert to ask for a correction and some accountability. It’s quite simple. And you might cut and paste this message or some version of it:
I saw MTP last week. Hatch’s smear on Lam is basically what he used to save himself. He was going down hard. Russert letting Hatch get away with this just sends a message to other Republicans – when your lifeboat is sinking on this show throw the truth overboard.
Suggest Russert issue correction about the lies on his show and hold his guests to some accountability to the truth when they are talking to him. Here are all the details about Hatch’s lies which need to be corrected: http://thinkprogress.org/2007/…..ection-mtp
Hugh @
13
Actually, I read that story too, and at least they did mention it … sort of:
As one of Putnam’s constituents, I want somebody who represents me … not the GOP!
sorry guys, must go off topic, this is huge
a poster downstairs brought this up
Anna Perenna @ 156
and I had to follow that link and paste this…this is too important to leave our readers to click the link
the following is authored by the president of the john birch society and you must read this
man, when the winguts call these morons liars what can possibly be left?
Given the RNC’s 24/7 campaign to bash Pelosi for leading where Bush won’t dare to follow, none of its bashing would be old or stale news. Revealing it as false would be one more problem.
The WaPoo is spiking the news to cover Bush’s backside. My, my, what pictures Karl must have. Poor Katherine G. must spin non-stop.
was he talkin’ ’bout Air Force 3 again?
Scarecrow @ 60
That’s probably because it’s not the article that was originally put up. That one talked about the FEMA director and that he felt prepared for the next hurricane season. In that one, Gore was not mentioned except in the body of the story but only in the link name.
Journalism 101: NEVER BURY THE LEDE. The WaPoo just spiked it, instead.
Oops. that last sentence of mine should read:
In that one, Gore was not mentioned in the body of the story but only in the link name.
Just sent Lyndsey Layton this email, to let her know we got her message in the chat:
Found this nugget thanks to ‘deminks’ at DU:
http://www.law.com/jsp/article…..s=newswire
TeddySanFran @ 72
good idea.
Douglas Feith should be tried for treason.
FITZ!!!
Given that there was about a fifteen second interval between the first post appearing here and when I clicked on it and found the corrected link, it’s possible that the problem at NYT was mechanical/technological rather than editorial.
Hugh @
71
pow wow @
57
Is Hillary going to support thisneurophius @ 76
To the Hague with him.
HotFlash @
44
Twenty percent of the world’s labor force is in China. The Global 1000 has made major investments there to lower costs and tap the huge local market. They are dispeptic about labor costs and regulation.
Chinese unions, by the way, are not US/European style trades unions. They are company/location based groups that bargain for local only issues. Much more fragmented than a national or trades union. And still the Global 1000 seek to trample them as if this were Shanghai in 1925.
Apparently the WaPoo has forgotten about the famous “inverted pyramid” of journalism.
You’re supposed to put the important stuff at the front of the article and the less important stuff at the end. That way, if you need to cut the article for length, you cut from the bottom and the important stuff stays in.
The WaPoo cut the most important facts from this article. Not for length, I suspect, or because it was “dated,” as they say, but rather to conform to the latest edition of the Republican Talking Points.
A once-great paper sinks deeper into the mire.
Sorry about mixing up two thoughts.
neurophius @ 76
It just occurred to me that Feith may be vulnerablee to the same crime for which Monica Goodling possibly took the 5th — providing information you knew was wrong to someone testifying to congress.
“Is Hillary going to support thisneurophius @ 76
Douglas Feith should be tried for treason.
FITZ!!!
To the Hague with him.”
Oh, yes, how could I forget? He should be tried for international war crimes as well.
Blub @ 77
The Times sometimes will keep a link but change a story. Recently there was a story about the supplemental which I criticized severely. The next day same link, same title but different article written by other people.
Only time will tell with regard to Senator Clinton and the other wind-testers, Terry O. – she ‘didn’t know anything about it’ when asked about the bill on the campaign trail earlier this week. There are nine senators officially on board so far, per Bob Geiger, with more announcements expected when the senators return to Washington next week.
neurophius @ 76
Hehe.. as late as last month the Moony Times was on record accuisng us of “Borking” the Feithster, basically arguing that being wrong (or outright lying) wasn’t such a big deal if its intended to benefit the Republic.
Phoenix Woman’s post from March 4th is quite timely, eh Teddy? Only this time the reporter did not “bury the lede”, the editor annihilated it.
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..-the-lede/
(perhaps Lindsey read PW’s post here first and just wanted to yell today– booyah!)
Is it just me or does that guy look like the illegitimate “son” of the Reverwanker Knobson.
Putnam is competing with Orrin Hatch for the title, “Least Credible Congresscritter.”
Scarecrow @ 81
You are on to something. When do the yellowcake hearing start? Next week I think.
Well, if he is ever hauled into court to answer for his transgressions, maybe Feith’s attorneys would pull the “stupid” defense…get Gen. Tommy Franks to testify to his famous opinion that Feith is the stupidest f*@#ing human on the planet, so he couldn’t have known what he was doing.
Earl Scheib @
88
Nah. Inhofe still keeps the title, in my book.
lolo: yes, this week’s new South Park featured Bill Donahue in a major role. When he first appeared on the screen, both my hubby and I thought it was actually Karl Rove!
They could have actually skewered Donahue more, IMO.
Blub @ 92
WHAT??? Not Lieberliar???
neurophius @
93
hehe. is he still a senator? :P
Well, there’s McCain.
http://www.editorandpublisher……1003568551
They’re competing mightily!
landofthefree @ 92
I’m glad South Park is still on the ball. Nothing pisses off arrogant SOBs more than to be mocked ruthlessly by scathingly accurate satire. XD I really need to catch up with that show, it’s been years since i’ve seen any of it.
For the record, here’s the entire 187-word text of the Feingold/Reid bill, and the senators who have expressed support for it, again from bobgeiger.blogspot.com:
* Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
* Chris Dodd (D-CT)
* Russ Feingold (D-WI)
* Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
* John Kerry (D-MA)
* Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
* Harry Reid (D-NV)
* Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
* Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
I think I’m just going to crawl under a rock, and peek out on Nov 5, 2008.
Oh Christ, not really, but I want to. – kind of.
Hugh- check this out- was this the orignal article?
http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=6337169
Can anyone tell me when the wrongly spelt “lede” arrived instead of the correct “lead”?
Take a look at Putnam’s Eleven, the incumbent GOPers he gave $2,500 to last week:
Lawmaker 2006%
Steve Chabot (Ohio) 53
John Doolittle (Calif.) 49
Jim Gerlach (Pa.) 51
Robin Hayes (N.C.) 50
Joe Knollenberg (Mich.) 52
Jon Porter (Nev.) 48
Deborah Pryce (Ohio) 51
David Reichert (Wash.) 51
Rick Renzi (Ariz.) 52
Peter Roskam (Ill.) 51
Heather Wilson (N.M.) 50
inmymind’seye @ 98
You’re kidding, right? The next few months are going to be some of the most interesting in our history. We are going to witness a regime collapse and go into spasms, and the media struggle to cover it while grappling with their own complicity. It is going to be quite a spectacle — and we are not just passive watchers; we’ll be moving it along, every chance we get. This is our chance to get out country back, to leave a heritage for those who follow, and I wouldn’t miss it for anything.
OT: Watching USA right now, waiting for “Law & Order” reruns to start, and I’m struck by how much progress we’ve made as a nation. Fifty years ago, when dozens of white men with clubs were chasing a black man across a field, it was called a “lynching”. Today, we call it “professional golf”.
Terry Olson @ 96
E&P is really hammering GOP credibility…
I’m sure some Bush staffer will be happy to explain to us that this kind of anti-Latino prejudice by Latino editorial writers is a stain on our great national tradition of inclusion. And then they’ll put some Latino parents in prison camps.
maunga: “Lede” became journo-speak for “lead” because it can’t be mistakenly pronounced “led,” as in “zeppelin”.
landofthefree @ 92
thanks!
maunga @
100
Longtime journalism convention, perhaps to distinguish the “lead” of the story from the “lead” the newstype used to be set in? (This is a wild-ass guess on my part.)
Scarecrow @ 102
Here here, Scarecrow and firepups..the best is yet to come and we need to watch it and help it along.. we have work to do!
The Pelosi plane story reminds me a lot of the similar Clinton story. Remember when Clinton held up air traffic so that he could get his hair cut by a stylist named “Christofe”? Pat Buchanan couldn’t stop chortling about it.
Do you remember how it turned out that the story wasn’t true? There were no air traffic delays. Oops. That part wasn’t as widely reported.
Scarecrow @ 102
I am joking of course, but the enormity of fuckery, and possibility of treachery (9/11 episode, martial law, nuclear war, … you name it) sorta kinda freaks me out. I’ll be working hard for the cause, and not under a rock. But there are times …
Where’s Rayne?
How can we have a debate about the least credible Senator without mentioning Specter?
lolo @ 45
Ummm…
peony Putnam’s e-mail.
ES? I plan on watching as i work and find my way out of my own batch of problems. I may not be able to do much but to email my congresscritters but i CAN keep an eye out on things. Needless to say, there is the fascination thing just watching it as well…
Frank Probst @ 112
Apparently not! 8-P
Terry Olson @ 111
Rayne’s on vacation, IIRC. A two week jaunt.
aliasofwestgate @ 117
Thank you, I was getting worried.
Valley Girl @ 99
That seems to be a longer version of the second article posted at the Times. Gray comes off as more of a crusty coot in the one you link to.
The first article I saw was fairly innocuous about hurricane preparation and I just mentioned it here because there was the discrepancy between the title and what the article was actually about. The Times apparently caught the mistake and put the current short article which does mention Gore up.
Thank you for the talk down though Scarecrow.
Either the NYT caught their mistake, or they are monitoring your FDL posts, Hugh. It’s one or the other….
aliasofwestgate @ 115
Wonderful! Lets do this together any way possible. Informed attention and writing letters will help a lot.
One thing’s likely… they’re gonna find Putnam humping his pet Labrador in the basement of the Rayburn office building one of these days.
Foley’s limousine service was likely his only source of “girlfriends,” and it’s gonna dry up real soon….
Hugh- okay. I tried use Lexis Nexis to find the orignal article, but came up empty. I’ll try again.
The last few years have made me very interested in politics, ES. It’s one of those odd things. I really hate politicking in the workplace, but they do affect me. Goes the same for what happens in the government. Being aware is the best thing to do, or you end up being used. No matter what your disgust level is with the whole system. Know how it works, so you can flow with it all as the sh*t hits the fan. Done it more than once at various jobs over the last few years.
I doubt i’ll ever enter politics as a career in my life, but i wont’ be used by politicians either. (or crappy management)
OT – completly – but
Did you know that you could get a WWMD wristband?
Yes, you guessed it, it stands for What Would Molly Do?
Molly Ivins, that is.
Available at the Texas Observer website
http://www.texasobserver.org
It’s contageous. Even the Department of Education.
http://speaker.gov/blog/
Valley Girl @
124
I wouldn’t worry too much about it. These things happen. Electronic journalism happens so fast that fact-checking and quality control is often impossible, and happens only by way of correction. That’s not to say that we shouldn’t keep the media outlets honest and call them out when they fail, but sometimes one does have to make allowances for the constraints of the media. If they really managed to catch and correct an error at the exact moment we noticed it, then all the better for them. NYT has, IMO, been surprisingly well behaved of late.. certainly better than its DC sister. …and I’m actually looking foward to them being the first major outlet to call for shrub to go, in about six months.
One of the few good things about Doug Feith being “the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth” is that he has absolutely no idea when to keep his mouth shut. Memo to Doug: It’s the First Rule of Holes. When you’re in one, stop digging.
aliasofwestgate – Well said!
Valley Girl @ 124
In all honesty, I doubt it’s worth the effort. I think it was a glitch at the Times which they quickly corrected.
I’m more interested in the cases like I mentioned above with the supplemental story where an article appears up for some hours and then is replaced by a different story although the title doesn’t change and the link that used to go to the old story now takes you to the new one.
For me, it’s a question of transparency. What happened to the old story and why was it replaced?
tejanarusa @
126
well, that is one wristband that i will buy and wear proudly.
thank you.
Pach in the house.
the media lets the goopers start with a clean slate everyday but Democrats have every stain for life. During the Romney hunting story -Fatass Tweety brought up John Kerry’s hunting trip in Ohio and the moron Harris on gopolitico brought up a story about Hillary Clinton that was false and he said that but used it anyway –”weren’t we talking about Romney there for a minute.”
This smells entirely of a set-up question, akin to Abu Gonzalez’s famous responses to Republican senators to whom he’s previously fed helpful questions: “Senator, I appreciate the opportunity to answer this question.”
so will we need to call crimson “rede”?
[dang…the burdons of modern life never stop expanding.]
Pach has Late Nite upstairs
Hugh- is this the article (text not Gore link) that was posted? Lede probably different.
FEMA Chief promises readiness
Oh, yeah, in searching, I also came up with this:
Ex-FEMA director admits to lies after Katrina
~~When asked why he lied, Brown said, “People get fired for telling the truth.”
He said lying is a “systemic problem” in Washington, but “when it comes to life and death issues, you should really tell the truth.” ~~
innisfree @ 135
I wondered if Ms. Layton lives in Dunn Loring and submitted the question the night before, from home. Or if her friend did.
Sorry, Blub and Hugh- I didn’t read the comments- “like, don’t worry about it!” I was off searching. ;)
TeddySanFran @ 107
That’s pretty much what my journalism professors told me.
From Valley Girl’s linked article:
Brown also criticized Michael Chertoff, the secretary of Homeland Security, saying, “I think Michael Chertoff was clueless and didn’t know what was going on.”
Pot calling kettle….
When asked why he lied, Brown said, “People get fired for telling the truth.”
He said lying is a “systemic problem” in Washington, but “when it comes to life and death issues, you should really tell the truth.”
Hunh. Another kool-aid drinker sensing the change in the direction of the wind.
Frank Probst @ 112
Spector’s unique brand of uncredibility deserves its own circle in hell. He is the ultimate “concern troll.” He frowns and wrings his hands and expresses grave worries and doubts about the Bush administration’s latest abuses of the Constitution, then goes ahead and votes the party line.
tejanarusa- SNAP! I edited my comment to include that part about “People get fired for telling the truth..” But I didn’t add the Chertoff bit. Thanks!
Valley Girl @ 144
VG – I certainly didn’t mean to imply you had omitted anything – in fact, I owe you an apology – I read too fast and didn’t see that I was re-quoting what you already had (I have to speed-read to keep up around here). sorry.
tejanarusa- that quote about “People getting fired…” wasn’t in what I originally posted. I only edited it a while later. So, I don’t think your reading was at fault! No apologies needed!
Great post, Teddy. I’ve alway appreciated what you have had to say. Thanks.
(Putnam) calls the Pelosi plane story, whatever its legitimacy, “the first break [Republicans] have had from the media in driving our message since before the Mark Foley story broke.”
Hmmm, the first time in months I’ve heard any Republican refer to the Mark Foley sex scandal, even though it rocked the Republican Party, and the Foley-enabling House Republican leadership, just before the last election, which Republicans lost by a landslide.
Republicans lost control of “driving the message” last October and subsequently lost big. Even getting “loyal Bushie” U.S. Attorneys around the country to try to “drive the message” by fabricating pre-election negative news about Democrats didn’t work. The Mark Foley sex scandal “drove the message” last October and drove many Republicans out of office.
In the pre-Reagan past, a Fairness Doctrine democratic news media would have stopped these utterly evil “swift-boating” attacks by Republicans, or at least led to a vigorous challenge of the Republican lies, letting the TRUTH almost immediately offset the Republican LIES.
Adam Putnam, a lying neo-con Republican, is beneath contempt as are all the lying neo-con Republicans. They are a greater danger to our democracy than all the Communists and al Qaeda combined.
I am Dunn Loring, Va. I frequently ask questions to the Post chats under Dunn Loring, Va. or Chantilly, Va. in order to expand the reportage or to attempt to provoke the person conducting the chat. About 50 percent of my queries get answered.
And you’d think that Putnam was elected to represent his district, not the GOP, in the House…Wonder how well that will play back in his district come election time…
There is a story up over at Eschaton (http://atrios.blogspot.com/200…..1241609223) about WaPo changing a story after it was published.
It appears that the editors at WaPo are systematically altering reporter’s stories to remove salient facts in order to make the story more congenial to the administration, its party, and its case for war against Iran.
God, how low that paper has sunk.
The media are part and parcel as much to blame for Americas troubles as are the wingnuts in the GOP, when we again have a functioning free press we will again be a thriving democracy, not until then.
Awesome, Adrian aka Dunn Loring – great job all the way around. [Lyndsey was probably quite happy to see your latest question, thanks to the way you worded it to give her a great opening to rehab her own credibility a little on that story.]