de751e84-6350-4b3e-b908-04e4a05d3f8b.jpg

The Brownification of the EPA looks like it's having consequences:

The Supreme Court today ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider its refusal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, narrowly siding with 12 states and various environmental groups in a battle with the Bush administration over global warming.

In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled after a four-year court battle that the EPA has "a statutory obligation" under the Clean Air Act to regulate cars' emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. It said the agency based its refusal to do so on "impermissible considerations" in an arbitrary and capricious way and that it must take a fresh look at the issue, grounding its reasons for action or inaction on the law.

[]

"EPA has offered no reasoned explanation for its refusal to decide whether greenhouse gases cause or contribute to climate change," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority. Joining him were Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Anthony M. Kennedy.

Dissenting were the four most conservative members of the court: Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Roberts argued that while global warming may be a "crisis" and even "the most pressing environmental issue of our time" as the plaintiffs alleged, it is not an issue requiring the intervention of Supreme Court. He said the majority's decision transgressed the proper role of the courts in a democratic society.

Yeah, it's not like it was a presidential election or anything. 

Is there anything of value in this country they haven't trashed?