
This morning, Sen. Orrin "Never Met A Bushie I Couldn't Defend" Hatch got his panties in a twist on Meet the Press:
HATCH: "This has been badly handled by people...not by Judge Gonzales, but by others....These are top flight people, doing a terrific job...."
HATCH: "I have never seen him prevaricate. I have never seen him do anything that was wrong." (Vouching for AG Gonzales' credibility.)
HATCH: Boy, I'll tell you, there ought to at least be some evidence that something was really wrong here and uh, and uh, to imply that there was criminal activity...And in the Monica Goodling case. Let's be honest about it. Her attorney...it was one of the most gutsy letter...letters I have ever seen. He's says that the atmosphere is so poisoned on the Judiciary Committee, with no real justification, that he's not going to put her through it because, uh, you never know how they would miscontrue what she has to say.
RUSSERT: Sen. Hatch, let me ask you a simple question, however, if in fact the Preseident decides that Mr. Gonzales should step down...
HATCH (interrupting): Well, now, that's the President's decision. (Read in an unctuous tone.)
RUSSERT: And the President came to you and asked you to be the next AG, would you do it?
Sen. Hatch demurs and says he'd be awfully hard to confirm, all the while scowling about what meanies the Democrats are for asking questions. And then says that Gonzales is incapable of lying. (And says it with a straight face.)
Kudos to Sen. Pat Leahy for maintaining a straight face throughout this whole appearance. I think I would have found myself falling out of my chair laughing at Hatch's blustering, knickers in a twist performance. Leahy did manage to tweak Hatch for "actively campaigning" for the AG position this week (am still not certain if he was kidding, or if he was really tweaking him for it -- but either way, it was hilarious.)
From the WaPo this morning:
No other administration in contemporary times has had such a clear pattern of filling chief prosecutors' jobs with its own staff members, said experts on U.S. attorney's offices. Those experts said the emphasis in appointments traditionally has been on local roots and deference to home-state senators, whose support has been crucial to win confirmation of the nominees.The pattern from Bush's second term suggests that the dismissals were half of a two-pronged approach: While getting rid of prosecutors who did not adhere closely to administration priorities, such as rigorous pursuit of immigration violations and GOP allegations of voter fraud, White House and Justice officials have seeded federal prosecutors' offices with people on whom they can depend to carry out the administration's agenda.
Seems to me that this question is not going away any time soon. Nor should it. Politicizing the rule of law and standards of justice for your own political ends over every other consideration? Now THAT pisses me off. (And you know that the Bush Administration is doing a crap job of damage control when even Weekly Standard stalwarts are calling them incompetent. Heckuva job, Bushie!)
Today's runner-up April Fool: Sen. Mitch "Double Standard" McConnell.
Alternate runners-up: Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham. St. McCain, who continues his "downtown Baghdad is a shopping extravaganza" tour today:
"The American people are not getting the full picture of what's happening here. They're not getting the full picture of the drop in murders, the establishment of security outposts throughout the city, the situation in Anbar province, the deployment of additional Iraqi brigades which are performing well, and other signs of progress having been made," said McCain, of Arizona.He said the Republican congressional delegation he led to Iraq drove from Baghdad's airport to the center of the city, citing that as proof that security was improving in the capital. Prominent visitors normally make the trip by helicopter.
The delegation was accompanied by heavily armed U.S. troops when they were not in the Green Zone, site of the U.S. Embassy and Iraqi government. They traveled in armored military vehicles under heavy guard....
The delegation, which also included Rep. Mike Pence, a Republican from Indiana, and Rep. Rick Renzi, an Arizona Republican, spoke glowingly of an hour they spent in the Bab al-Sharqi market which was hit by a suicide bomber on Jan. 22. At least 88 people died in the attack. (emphasis mine)
Sen. Graham then went on to say during the presser from Baghdad today that he got "five rugs for five bucks." Yes, Senator, it's all about the bargain hunting, and I'm certain that the troops in your heavily armored vehicles were so happy to help you save a buck or two as they risked their lives for your hour-long photo-op, before you scurried back to the Green Zone in your heavily armored vehicles with armed escorts.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Somebody say twist?
Morning, Twisted. :)
Mornin’ Firepups!
I have to say that I did myself a big favor by letting the lil’ one watch Harold the Purple Crayon this morning.
My blood pressure is reasonable…got a smile on my face…
I think I’ll go for a bike ride today.
Good morning Christy, sounds like you are getting the rain we go last night. Hope you won’t be mad if the Wolverines hire your BBall coach!
Wingnut Political Operative in the DOJ!
The Justice Department officials who were selected to be interviewed hit merely the tip of this iceberg. It is extremely important that the House and Senate Judiciary Committee’s interview John Nowacki, Principal Deputy Director as well as the Acting Counsel to the Director in the Executive Office of the Justice Department, in order to establish the links between the Justice Department officials, the US Attorney’s in the field, and the political operatives who helped remove the targeted US Attorney’s. I have gathered and organized every document released so far from the Justice Department relating to John Nowacki as well as background information on his relationship with the Federalist Society. You will be shocked at how many key pieces of information he gives to Paul McNulty, William Moschella, Michael Elston, William Mercer, Monica Goodling, and former employees Michael Battle and Kyle Sampson.
This story on John Nowacki, including updates, can be found at: http://misterapologist.blogspot.com/
OT- Cspan is running the Sampson testimony now.
The Bush administration sucks rocks.
I just wanted to get that off my chest. Please disperse. Nothing to see here.
Does Leahy have a shred of evidence?
I’m going to bet he does.
BTW, Orrin, ‘high level officials’ are not above the law.
Meanwhile, the AP is hard at work on the ultimate missing white woman case.
Terras Irradient
New invasion rationale–we went there for the rugs.
Turning this hilarious comment into a serious note for just a moment, the cheap rugs are just a small, but perhaps symbolic, representation of the economic exploitation motive that was really behind the invasion.
Zach Edwards @ 6
Anything about Alice Fisher in there? She’s the fixer.
Hatch’s position was as simple as it is indefensible: unless criminal conduct can be proven prior to investigation, then there should be no investigation.
After hearing him stammer out “tempest in a tea…in…in…a coffee cup” I realized I’d love to play poker with him, so’s to win some easy money. He’s a shitty bluffer.
Great post Christy. I watched the meltdown live on MTP.
Drip, drip, drip. BushCo, corrupt to the core.
Orrin Hatch. Pete Domenici.
Ethics committee investigation.
Isn’t there enough already?
Zach Edwards @
6
Thanks, Zach. You may want to draft a brief missive summarizing your research and send it by fax to the House Oversight Committee, addressed to Senator Waxman and Majority Counsel.
Fax number: 202-225-4784
Nice article in flyover country that spanks one-party rule. Not happy about the little dig at the end, but 97% of the article is a smack-down of the Republicans’ use of their former majority.
I liked the part about Hatch replacing Gonzales. Too many mental gymnastics to even begin on that one.
Neil @ 14
Corrupt at the cortex, corrupt to the core. They really don’t even make a show of hiding it.
A’57 @ 11
A’83.
Did McCain’s convoy drive in from the airport because, maybe, you know, US helicopters have been getting SHOT OUT OF THE SKY at an unpresdented rate over the last 3months?
A’57 @ 11
Who?
Does Wrangle’s raspy voice grow on other people like it grows on me? I heard him speak (preach) at Riverside Church a few years ago–some anti-war gettogether. Loved him.
Ever notice how tight Orrin’s shirt collars are? Classic case of blood not flowing to the brain resulting in idiotoalysis, a rare disease making a strong comeback on Sunday MSM bloviations.
Gives the term “Hatch Act” a whole new twist, doesn’t it?
when he wasnt holding them together, Hatch’s hands were shaking. what had him so tense?
also–Leahy declined to call him a liar after one outrageous statement–Leahy noted when asked about the comment that it was April Fool’s Day.
Hatch should look at the polls, only the gooper tps agree that this is the democrats playing politics.
My comment @ 14 can be read if people refresh.
sofistic @ 24
Hatchet Act?
Maybe also check out Larry Johnson’s place this morning. Nice one WRT Natasha.
CHS@zed
bg at 29 — I saw that, and I have a feeling that something may be coming down the pike on that at some point soon. *g*
Orrin pulling Gonzales’ Latino card was worth a chuckle. OK, maybe Newt didn’t laugh so much. Ghetto tongue in cheek.
tommy yum @
27
Speaking of ‘can be read’, Sadly, No! is working again, Tommy. At last!
does the 5th Amendment have a prospective clause cause Hatch says Goodling’s lawyer wrote a brilliant letter?
I can’t find it.
Wonder how many of those “bargain rugs” were left by refugees fleeing Baghdad? Betcha’ he didn’t ask. The bargain does not come with a “provenance.”
Too funny indeed if Hatch were recently campaigning behind the scenes to replace Gonzo. What an a-hole (both of ‘em) :)
It was exquisitely funny to watch Hatch’s namby-pamby “interrogation” of his former staffer, Kyle Sampson, this week. I never saw such softballs. The man has no shame (both of ‘em) :)
Personally, I would love to see Hatch nominated for AG. Not confirmed, just nominated. To have him be questioned, under oath, about the whole Tolson incident would be wonderful.
Wow. MSNBC is touting a Time magazine poll “showing” that both top-running Republican presidental candidates would beat Clinton and Obama.
Gee, a Republican-friendly Time poll, touted by traditional media. Kinda like eating your own poo for its nutritional value.
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 33
W00T!!1!!eleven!
Sen. Huckleberry–stealing antiquities from the country of origin; very noblesse oblige of him.
Tommy Y, yes, and somewhere today is also an article saying the top two “conservative” candidates support detention without charges for Americans, here in the USA.
S.O.S. from MA @ 36
Softballs? Larry King must have had an orgasm if he was listening!!!
That lying weasel made me so mad that I threw the remote at the tv.
I just don’t get how Orrin can square deliberately stacking the DOJ and US Atty’swith blatantly partisan hacks, and destroying the integrity and trust we all have to have in order for the system to work right and meet the standards of the constitution. Why is he covering for the bad guys? Why isn’t he angry at the trashing of our justice system? Seriously, don’t any of them get that it’s the constitution that creates and maintains the United States of America?
Why so obsessed with Orrin’s underwear?
bg @ 41
I saw that, at Think Progress, I believe.
“Strong Daddy” is so 11/6.
tommy yum @ 38, good. Now Time can lay off the Democratic candidates and beat up on the Republic front-runners. Or not.
OK, ok, that was naive, I know. Hope you all had a good laugh ;-)
Showdown on military funding supplemental: haven’t seen any Ds make the point yet that if war funding were put in normal budget by DOD, there wouldn’t be any last minute problems. Hope they point that out as time gradually expires. Puts blame where blame is due.
11/6!!
707
Sally @ 47
TIME isn’t going to do anything of the sort. Look at their current issue. Not one mention of the USA scandals. Sampson testimony? Who’s that?
sunny @ 45
He has them bleached and starched.
Neil @ 52
He’s such a stiffie!!
A’57 @ 11
It’s your reunion year. 50! Congrats.
Sampson has to go back to tell the committee just how many of those Wednesday meetings Karl attended. Just sayin’.
Those GOPers really didn’t want him to talk about it. Bet that interruption was pre-arranged to go into play if the hearings went in that direction. I was so disappointed that Grassley didn’t finish.
Maybe Hatch is shakey because a few more layers of investigation and he’ll be knee deep in the shit without a pony in sight.
5 rugs for 5 bucks? Now that’s value!
KO is good about pointing out exactly who will be responsible for not funding the war–the guy who stridently promises to veto the supplemental.
sunny at 45 — Well, if I had been technically correct I should have said “‘garments’ in a twist” — but if you’d seen the look that Hatch had on his face while he was talking, you would understand. Looked like he had a super atomic wedgie the entire show.
bg @
29
Woohoo! LOVED this bit:
and on the heels of Budowsky’s comment that Natasha isn’t very important in this. I think I heard her head explode…
The Salvador Dali wing of the Republic party was out in force this morning.
“Five rugs for five bucks.” These guys are going to put the Onion out of business.
Let’s not put stiffie & Orrin’s underware in same comment.
Christy, I missed the last thread but this caught my eye in the WaPo this morning. Noted from the “supersecret” Gridiron Club dinner last night (we may presume it was really Condi and Rumsfeld since the dinner is ‘off the record’):
“Two very good singers, imported by the Gridiron Club, pretending to be Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Arm in arm they proffered a revisionist version of “I Remember It Well” from “Gigi.” In the song, Rumsfeld remembers Iraqis welcoming U.S. troops “with open arms.” Rice reminds him, “They opened fire! They set off bombs!” An oblivious Rumsfeld responds, “Oh, right, I remember it well.”
….
“Asked if the apparent coziness between Gridiron members and newsmakers bothered him, club president Bill Neikirk of the Chicago Tribune said: “I don’t know why it would feel too cozy. We’re not sucking up to them.”
wapo link
Neil @
52
… Prior to screwing them on
;>)
NickOdemus @
24
I’ve always wondered who it was that decreed that for a man to be considered professional and well-dressed, he had to cut off the blood supply to the brain…
Christy Hardin Smith @ 58
So that’s what it was! I always thought that was the public face of the GOP.
wtlloyd @ 56
And how much money did it cost us for him to do that? How many soldiers were in danger so that assclown could buy a rug?
Great post, Christy, as usual.
Hatch gets his big boy panties in a knot!
I’m from Montana. I want to know why Conrad Burns (Abrahmof’s biggest “friend” in the Senate) wasn’t ever really pursued. If I understand correctly, the current USA for Montana is holding down two positions, one of them being a promotion from the USA position. We now what happened when USAs wouldn’t play ball. What happens when they did?
eCAHNomics @
12
Well, crap. The next logical step will be Persian carpet bombing.
Sampson is also to report back on the three names on his list who were not fired (those he couldn’t recall at the hearing). I hope we learn that, too. It’s been suggested Fitzgerald was one of them.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 58
Quite a contrast to Pat Leahy- loved his piercing gaze & “Are you standing by that bullshit, Orrin?” smile…
Time?
Looks like it’s Time to stop polishing Giuliani’s halo and start doing some reporting.
No, they’re not going to do that. It’s time for us to put Time Magazine in the same circular filing cabinet that newsmax and other right-wing noise makers belong in.
Eli @ 69
Wiltons of mass destruction.
They seem to be back on the “they were fired for performance issues” talking point, which has already been proven to be a non-starter for them. And the fact that Orrin “Please Don’t Ask About Brett Tolman” Hatch is the only one defending Gonzo speaks volumes.
Elliott at 67 — Thank goodness for the DVR, I’ll tell yu that much. I had to run the long Hatch quote back and forth several times this morning. He was hemming and hawing so much, and talking in run on sentences — made it tough to transcribe. But I wanted to get it exactly…because it was such craptastic tap dancing. Even for Hatch, it was incredibly unctuous this morning. I really don’t know how Leahy doesn’t just laugh out loud. (Lots of practice, I suppose…*g*)
Eli @ 69
And here I thought it would be higher quality comb-overs?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 75
I loved Leahy’s damnation through faint praise, thanking Hatch for his “lovely” birthday card!
I hope the rug story gets a lot of play. When the Mongols sacked Baghdad in 1258, Baghdad was the jewel of the Middle East. There was a lot of plunder after the Mongols murdered a half a million or more people.
History repeats itself. Tragedy and more tragedy.
Christy Hardin Smith @
31
Christy, first, my thanks for your willingness to actually watch things like MTP. For myself, my blood pressure couldn’t handle it.
On the Plame outing, does anyone know if any new stars were added to the CIA memorial soon after the Novakula column? Seems to me, that would offer at least some circumstantial proof of her status…
Sally @ 70
They already have a lot of e-mails. Sampson more or less said that he brought it up once, realized it was inappropriate, and then immediately dropped it. I suspect that the e-mails tell a different story, and that Sampson will be ‘revising’ his statement.
Pretty sure I heard Orrin at one point refer to the AG as “General” Gonzales. Anyone else catch that?
To me Orin Hatch alwys looks like he just smelled something awful.
“If April comes, can Spring be far behind?”-
Shelley
No-one’s calling him “Booby Hatch”?
Too obvious?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 75
I hardly ever watch Timmeh anymore but I’ll be sure to catch the late night replay for this one! Thanks!
OT, and I almost never do this, but… I have an exclusive follow-up on Matthew Dowd.
I’m pretty selective about when I watch MTP and Orrin Hatch today was why. How Russert let him go on and on, repeating the Repub talking points of the last few weeks—the “badly handled” meme, the “this is overblown” meme, the “at the pleasure of the president” meme—arrrgh! I know they send the young Republican bots to school to learn how to do this don’t take a breath while you’re talking stuff, the trick of never putting a period in what you’re saying so you can run down the clock on your time, but to see an old bot do it is salt in the wound. And how Timmy did let him go on.
I was apoplectic—again. Dogs ran into the crate, again. LOL! Thanks for putting up this post, Christy, so I don’t feel I was the only one. It helps to have a place to rant.
Eli @ 84
Darn sure it is NOTNOTNOT Althouse.
Oh, dear. Time must not have noticed my cancellation was a protest. They have told me they want me back after telling me I was not to comment on the contents, just the delivery service. How Republic is that?
Sonoma Rus @ 82
Yeah, the stuff that comes out of his mouth.
Eli@69
Thanks. Never thought I’d laugh about bombing Iran.
darkblack @
63
He has them bleached and starched.
… Prior to screwing them on
;>)
They are not underwear they are LDS sacred garments.
edit:”Prior to screwing them on” no, “it’s prior to screwing with them on”..I am not making this up.
demit @ 87
I bet he zinged him with one of those “gotcha” quotes or video clips at the end, though. Right?
Right?
rabbit rabbit
Neil @
15
Yeah, at first I was yelling at the TV for Russert to cut Hatch’s meanderings off. Then I realized these weren’t meanderings. He was flailing around, the pitch of his voice was getting shrill and he was at a loss for words. It was like watching a bug in a jar, but more odious.
utahred @ 81
Attorneys General can be given the honorific of “General”
eCAHNomics @ 91
All part of the service.
Eli you are cracking me up.
Eli @ 86
Would that it were so… except the small plane part
*sigh*
dakine01 @ 96
Shouldn’t that be “odorific”?
Last evening I attended a speaking event where Scott Ritter spoke about the impending war with Iran.
Scott was asked how to resolve the war in Iraq.
A: Get out of Iraq right now. 80% of the violence in Iraq are directly related to or from friction from US presence.
Ritter’s take on Iran, the window for war with Iran has opened and will be open until June. All the components are in place, carrier groups, bombing groups, flight paths negotiated with neighboring countries, increasing the oil reserves in the strategic reserves.
He was very upset the amendment was removed from the spending bill to demand Bush to get permission to attack Iran. He feels that congress has abdicated their roll.
solai @ 37
Great idea!
Hatch is the only one defending Gonzales strongly, because that is part of the price to pay for getting the nomination himself when Gonzo steps down.
I thought Hatch sounded deranged. The longer he ranted the better, I thought.
katymine @ 101
now you’ve got me back under the bed.
Frank @ 80, Spector was beside himself when he thought Sampson was going to give up those three names. Don’t do it, son, don’t do it. Great moment. One of many.
Ritter was correct before the war and he’s correct now.
I’m furious that the amendment was removed.
Sally @ 106
Let me guess: Sampson couldn’t remember them?
McLaughlin, in introducing Purgegate topic, said: Sampson tears down the temple. Guess he’s reading FDL.
Jesterfox @ 102
yes, Excellent!
although I still don’t think we’ll ever see the Senate air that “little” scandal
Since it’s April 1st and somebody upthread mentioned the Onion, thought I’d share:
link
Frank Probst @ 80
Interesting insight. If you’re right, and the committee decides to allow Sampson to revise his statement, I wonderif the Dems can leverage it to demonstrate they’re after the facts and not pursuing it for politcal advantage only.
well, well, well,
it looks like more than the usual water carrying bluster from the gentleman from Utah - his timbre has rock and a hard place written all over it and I don’t think it’s Pat Leahy wryly toying with him like my cat on a mouse
he’s been directed by WH to get out there and sell it or face a whispering campaign surrouding his involvement in the Patriot Act/quid pro quo switcheroo -
Audrey @ 111
I assume the offending reporter was quickly wrestled to the ground.
Neil @ 53
And Fitz’s 25th.