<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep Pulling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:29:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Political Waves &#187; All the pretty ribbons</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597419</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Waves &#187; All the pretty ribbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597419</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] Keep Pulling Eli, FireDogLake […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Keep Pulling Eli, FireDogLake […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egregious</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597206</link>
		<dc:creator>egregious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Hope!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nice to see you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Hope!</p>
<p>Nice to see you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HopeSpringsATurtle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597204</link>
		<dc:creator>HopeSpringsATurtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In the better-late-than-never catagory, I scooped Eli. This maybe my one moment in the sun Eli. I posted the &lt;a href=&quot;http://deepconfusion.blogspot.com/2007/03/friday-night-music.html&quot;&gt;Weezer&lt;/a&gt; too…the day before you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the better-late-than-never catagory, I scooped Eli. This maybe my one moment in the sun Eli. I posted the <a href="http://deepconfusion.blogspot.com/2007/03/friday-night-music.html">Weezer</a> too…the day before you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creeper</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597051</link>
		<dc:creator>creeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-596437&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;upurr @&lt;br /&gt;
                56              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I move that we call all Republicans from here on out &lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bushies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  The Bushican Party  it will be instead of the Republican Party.  This will drive them bonkers, if they aren’t there already.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sampson is a Bushie.  The rest of the cohorts of the White House are Bushies.  No more Republicans, they succumbed to the Bush cult of personality.  We do need to come up with a new mascot for them, no more elephant.  Maybe a sheep will do?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AZMatt -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I love your idea - hope you bring it up repeatedly arond the blogosphere…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(End of quote…formatting affected by editing)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whoa!  Let’s think about this for a minute.  If we separate out current rethugs by referring to them as “Bushies” (much as I love the idea) do we not then confer some legitimacy on the rest of them?  You can’t tar some future rethug candidate who has no record of supporting Bush with the label of “Bushie”.  But if you stick to (holding nose) “Republican”, you snare the entire bunch in your net.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I think “Bushie” is a grand term for someone like McCain (and even Lieberman) I’m afraid it won’t work well for us if we do this across the board.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-596437"><em>upurr @<br />
                56              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I move that we call all Republicans from here on out <em><b>Bushies</b></em>.  The Bushican Party  it will be instead of the Republican Party.  This will drive them bonkers, if they aren’t there already.</p>
<p>Sampson is a Bushie.  The rest of the cohorts of the White House are Bushies.  No more Republicans, they succumbed to the Bush cult of personality.  We do need to come up with a new mascot for them, no more elephant.  Maybe a sheep will do?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>AZMatt -</p>
<p>I love your idea &#8211; hope you bring it up repeatedly arond the blogosphere…</p>
<p>(End of quote…formatting affected by editing)</p>
<p>Whoa!  Let’s think about this for a minute.  If we separate out current rethugs by referring to them as “Bushies” (much as I love the idea) do we not then confer some legitimacy on the rest of them?  You can’t tar some future rethug candidate who has no record of supporting Bush with the label of “Bushie”.  But if you stick to (holding nose) “Republican”, you snare the entire bunch in your net.</p>
<p>While I think “Bushie” is a grand term for someone like McCain (and even Lieberman) I’m afraid it won’t work well for us if we do this across the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrJJ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597009</link>
		<dc:creator>mrJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-597009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like Cheney and Rove short circuted a very serious problem when they had Carol Lam dismissed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Via TPM: Cunningham briber Mitchell Wade often bragged about his juice with Vice President Dick Cheney. Now Laura Rozen has more on the Wade-Cheney connection.&lt;br /&gt;
– Josh Marshall &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Former US Attorney Carol Lam didnt get the DOJ/Rove memo from the RNC mail server: Henceforth Political Corruption cases will be tolerated as long as they only target members of the Democratic Party. Please try to remember that “Just-Us only applies to those of us in the GOP”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The cunningham/wade primer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmmuckraker.com/cunningham.php&quot;&gt;http://tpmmuckraker.com/cunningham.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The First Contract&lt;br /&gt;
New questions arise concerning Mitchell Wade’s first White House contract — and his connections to the vice president. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewWeb&amp;articleId=12612&quot;&gt;http://www.prospect.org/web/pa.....leId=12612&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Cheney and Rove short circuted a very serious problem when they had Carol Lam dismissed.</p>
<p>Via TPM: Cunningham briber Mitchell Wade often bragged about his juice with Vice President Dick Cheney. Now Laura Rozen has more on the Wade-Cheney connection.<br />
– Josh Marshall </p>
<p>Former US Attorney Carol Lam didnt get the DOJ/Rove memo from the RNC mail server: Henceforth Political Corruption cases will be tolerated as long as they only target members of the Democratic Party. Please try to remember that “Just-Us only applies to those of us in the GOP”</p>
<p>The cunningham/wade primer</p>
<p><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.com/cunningham.php">http://tpmmuckraker.com/cunningham.php</a></p>
<p>The First Contract<br />
New questions arise concerning Mitchell Wade’s first White House contract — and his connections to the vice president. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewWeb&amp;articleId=12612">http://www.prospect.org/web/pa&#8230;..leId=12612</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Via</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596979</link>
		<dc:creator>Via</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This “off campus” email - the RNC accounts and the gwb.com or whatever else Rove and the WH used to circumvent the WH mail system - could be a real treasure trove.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This “off campus” email &#8211; the RNC accounts and the gwb.com or whatever else Rove and the WH used to circumvent the WH mail system &#8211; could be a real treasure trove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo-Ann</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo-Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596925</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-596537&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;JML @ 142 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Has anyone yet investigated the relationship of the  US attorney scandal  to the actual election fraud committed by the Bushies and their touch-screen minions in Ohio, Florida, Georgia etc?  Evidence  abounds of “irregularites” favoring the repubs which was never investigated. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Holt Bill attempts to ameliorate the problems of electronic voting by providing a paper trail, but the bill is years out of date and experts now agree that all touch screen and electronic voting must be eliminated in favor of paper ballots. Paper ballots and and two sets of electronic ballot scanners is the compromise postion. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; There is a strong case that the Democratic victories in 2006 would have been much bigger were it not for ballot manipulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the Rovian vision of voter fraud was successful in 2000 and 2004. But now we know the game plan. Paper ballots should return until the electronic machines are credible, if ever.Anybody with the power given to these sleasy operatives can rig an election. The disenfranchised votes probably would have swung both past elections to the Democrats. I’m glad there’s a new sheriff in town to shine light on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-596537"><em>JML @ 142 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Has anyone yet investigated the relationship of the  US attorney scandal  to the actual election fraud committed by the Bushies and their touch-screen minions in Ohio, Florida, Georgia etc?  Evidence  abounds of “irregularites” favoring the repubs which was never investigated. </p>
<p>The Holt Bill attempts to ameliorate the problems of electronic voting by providing a paper trail, but the bill is years out of date and experts now agree that all touch screen and electronic voting must be eliminated in favor of paper ballots. Paper ballots and and two sets of electronic ballot scanners is the compromise postion. </p>
<p> There is a strong case that the Democratic victories in 2006 would have been much bigger were it not for ballot manipulation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think the Rovian vision of voter fraud was successful in 2000 and 2004. But now we know the game plan. Paper ballots should return until the electronic machines are credible, if ever.Anybody with the power given to these sleasy operatives can rig an election. The disenfranchised votes probably would have swung both past elections to the Democrats. I’m glad there’s a new sheriff in town to shine light on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookwoman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596907</link>
		<dc:creator>bookwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596907</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why isn’t Ann Coulter in jail, then? She tried to vote in the wrong precinct. And why did THAT investigation fizzle?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn’t Ann Coulter in jail, then? She tried to vote in the wrong precinct. And why did THAT investigation fizzle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596888</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-596470&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;AZ Matt @&lt;br /&gt;
                82              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;GOP = Republicans &lt;b&gt;==&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Bushicans&lt;/b&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No more elephants for them, sheep they are now!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the current scandal is Bushie-gate!&lt;br /&gt;
Bushie-gate&lt;br /&gt;
Bushie-gate&lt;br /&gt;
Bushie-gate&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-596470"><em>AZ Matt @<br />
                82              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>GOP = Republicans <b>==</b> <b>Bushicans</b>!</p>
<p>No more elephants for them, sheep they are now!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And the current scandal is Bushie-gate!<br />
Bushie-gate<br />
Bushie-gate<br />
Bushie-gate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596882</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/30/keep-pulling/#comment-596882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-596412&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;AZ Matt @&lt;br /&gt;
                34              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I move that we call all Republicans from here on out &lt;em&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bushies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  The Bushican Party  it will be instead of the Republican Party.  This will drive them bonkers, if they aren’t there already.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sampson is a Bushie.  The rest of the cohorts of the White House are Bushies.  No more Republicans, they succumbed to the Bush cult of personality.  We do need to come up with a new mascot for them, no more elephant.  Maybe a sheep will do?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can’t resist even though epu - Repub mascot = Mastodon (or DoDo, anything extinct)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-596412"><em>AZ Matt @<br />
                34              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I move that we call all Republicans from here on out <em><b>Bushies</b></em>.  The Bushican Party  it will be instead of the Republican Party.  This will drive them bonkers, if they aren’t there already.</p>
<p>Sampson is a Bushie.  The rest of the cohorts of the White House are Bushies.  No more Republicans, they succumbed to the Bush cult of personality.  We do need to come up with a new mascot for them, no more elephant.  Maybe a sheep will do?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Can’t resist even though epu &#8211; Repub mascot = Mastodon (or DoDo, anything extinct)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
