You should check out the LP’s that Leonard Nimoy, William Shatner and yes………Jim Nabors aka. Gomer Pyle did back in the day…….now there’s some great comic material!!!

Same voice-over: “While he looked the other way on fraud, Iglesias did find time to take dozens of taxpayer funded junkets around the world.”

New graphic – Turdblossom huffing down runway, with folder of oppo research clippings. Trying to get the attention of one out of hundreds of soldiers carrying their packs up the ramp of a transport plane. Plane leaves, change to NYT conclusion that the charges of fraud were fraud themselves.

well, if you’re going to get all serious and insightful and on-point when i’ve been frivolous and off-point, i’ll simply have to agree and note that you’ve pretty much articulated that unspoken disgust i was feeling about the correspondents dinner.

Sorry. It started out as a light-hearted battle of the bad videos for me too, but the more I started to think about the MCRove, the more disgusted I got. It slipped. I hate what ChimpCo does to my sense of humor.

this is an ad — so hampered by its intentions.
i would submit that to be truly bad, you can’t actually want to go out and BE bad. true badness has to be produced by folks who think they are producing something GOOD.*

*using the conventional sense of good and bad.
or as has been said: “good and bad i define these terms, quite clear no doubt, somehow.”

Hmmm, I guess my point is: Look what happens when a bunch of country club folks get together and do “humorous” “rap”, it comes out like ye old minstrel show (re: Karl Rove), a disgusting class/race statement with plenty of chuckles all round from the in-bunch (Washington correspondants). Even if tea partay is making fun of country club folks, there’s an awful grain of truth to it, re: Karl Rove video.

well, if you’re going to get all serious and insightful and on-point when i’ve been frivolous and off-point, i’ll simply have to agree and note that you’ve pretty much articulated that unspoken disgust i was feeling about the correspondents dinner.

RealWorld @ 6

A while ago I asked if the FBI Director Mueller had committed purgery in his Senate testimony when he claimed that the field agent had been misquoted about the Lam firing. Here’s a good followup. FBI agent told to keep quiet over attorney firings

I hope they bring in field agent to testify.

The guy is not some minor “feild agent” he is a SAC (Supervisong Agent in Charge) the FBI counterpart to a US Attorney. I fact becasue some FBI field offices cover more than a single judicial district sometime a single SAC handles the turf of more than one USA. So, a SAC is a bigger fish within the FBI than a USA is within DOJ.

This is not some minor guy, this is a major guy

Even more to the point I think. No?

this is an ad — so hampered by its intentions.
i would submit that to be truly bad, you can’t actually want to go out and BE bad. true badness has to be produced by folks who think they are producing something GOOD.*

*using the conventional sense of good and bad.
or as has been said: “good and bad i define these terms, quite clear no doubt, somehow.”

Hmmm, I guess my point is: Look what happens when a bunch of country club folks get together and do “humorous” “rap”, it comes out like ye old minstrel show (re: Karl Rove), a disgusting class/race statement with plenty of chuckles all round from the in-bunch (Washington correspondants). Even if tea partay is making fun of country club folks, there’s an awful grain of truth to it, re: Karl Rove video.

But he’s so important that he answered his phone while rapping. Multi-tasking at it’s very finest.

Remember Karl sent those leftover quail wings out to the reporters while entertaining Mr. and Mrs. President?

I imagine nothing stops him from answering his phone or email messages – hey, it might be another fine political opportunity on the line.

looseheadprop @ 152

Keep your ears peeled, thanks. This bit — New Mexicans for Honest Courts — bothers me, seems like it’s not only a character assassination but innoculation.

And for what?

There is also a campaign finance issue. They are PAC. They are using PAC $ to run an oppo ad against a guy WHO IS NOT RUNNING FOR ANY OFFICE.

Tsk tsk tsk. Naughty naughty

LHP @ 130 – IANAL. And my memory might be bad – haven’t had much coffee. But I had a sense that the committee had made more than one request – could be wrong, sorry if I am – and that, combined with the MO of holding back (thanks, Rayne)is why I got there. That sense of “how many times do I have to ask you people for this?”

I’ll go back to lurking now.

No,no no, don’t lurk. That wasn’t meant as a smackdown, just as an expalianation.

Lawyerworld is a little counterintuitive sometimes