Comments on: Kyle Sampson Testimony, Part II http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:55:23 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: khouz65 http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592501 khouz65 Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:02:33 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592501 <p>Eye Direction and Lying<br /> I have read that it is looking to the left, not looking down, that tends to indicate lying, unless the person is left handed.</p> <p><a href="http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php">http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php</a></p> Eye Direction and Lying
I have read that it is looking to the left, not looking down, that tends to indicate lying, unless the person is left handed.

http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php

]]> By: brotrek http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592471 brotrek Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:56:36 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592471 <p><b>You asked “who will require whether this deserves the President’s attention?” Sampson doesn’t know if the President was ever consulted.</b></p> <p>When, if ever, did our Decider Decide these people should be fired?</p> You asked “who will require whether this deserves the President’s attention?” Sampson doesn’t know if the President was ever consulted.

When, if ever, did our Decider Decide these people should be fired?

]]> By: Billy B http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592458 Billy B Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:51:26 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592458 <p><a href="#comment-592275"><em>pricklypear @ 188 </em></a></p> <blockquote><p>Long time luker here..<br /> Fast eye blinking and/or looking down and away when replying to questions = lie</p></blockquote> <p>Yep. That’s a dead giveaway.</p> <p>heh.</p> pricklypear @ 188

Long time luker here..
Fast eye blinking and/or looking down and away when replying to questions = lie

Yep. That’s a dead giveaway.

heh.

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592328 mui Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:20:07 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592328 <p>Sampson: Domenici complained.<br /> Oh really, because Iglesias didn’t give in to Petey’s corrupt phone call?</p> Sampson: Domenici complained.
Oh really, because Iglesias didn’t give in to Petey’s corrupt phone call?

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592320 mui Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:17:27 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592320 <p>Note these Republikans keep using “turnover” like Iglesias and Lam were the “help.”</p> Note these Republikans keep using “turnover” like Iglesias and Lam were the “help.”

]]> By: anwaya http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592319 anwaya Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:16:31 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592319 <p>Orrin’s stats on Lam: on the stats he referred to, the West Texas US attorney, Johnny Sutton, was consistently worse than Lam. Lam was the median data point on every statistic. Sutton is an exemplary “loyal Bushie” (see his <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/txw/press_releases/Compean-Ramos/index.html">resume</a>) and was not fired.</p> Orrin’s stats on Lam: on the stats he referred to, the West Texas US attorney, Johnny Sutton, was consistently worse than Lam. Lam was the median data point on every statistic. Sutton is an exemplary “loyal Bushie” (see his resume) and was not fired.

]]> By: portia.vz http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592304 portia.vz Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:12:29 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592304 <p>The performance standards apparently were these:<br /> You will do what the WH asks you to do and pursue cases based only on WH policies.<br /> You will consult us when you are not sure whether your prospective case fits with WH policy.<br /> So, unfortunately, they WERE fired for performance issues. They acted independently and that was not in their objectives.</p> The performance standards apparently were these:
You will do what the WH asks you to do and pursue cases based only on WH policies.
You will consult us when you are not sure whether your prospective case fits with WH policy.
So, unfortunately, they WERE fired for performance issues. They acted independently and that was not in their objectives.

]]> By: Gles http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592301 Gles Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:11:31 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592301 <p>Thanks Christy………… I am on a dial-up…</p> Thanks Christy………… I am on a dial-up…

]]> By: Margot http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592297 Margot Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:11:18 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592297 <p>Remind Sampson he’s under oath before God and country.</p> Remind Sampson he’s under oath before God and country.

]]> By: melisa http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592292 melisa Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:09:39 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/29/kyle-sampson-testimony-part-ii/#comment-592292 <p>sampson just said he wasnt aware of the senators making phone calls to usa’s…..but that was in his firing plan….perjury again</p> sampson just said he wasnt aware of the senators making phone calls to usa’s…..but that was in his firing plan….perjury again

]]>