
(Photo via Still Burning.)
There may be legitimate reasons why Brett Tolman isn't in prison; I'm not sure. But there are certainly none that would explain why he is still the U.S. Attorney for Utah. Yes, another U.S. Attorney -- but one, unlike crimebusters Carol Lam, David Iglesias, John McKay, etc -- that wasn't fired. In fact, if not for Mr. Tolman none of them would have been fired. But that goes back to his old job when he was a staffer for Arlen Specter at the time when Specter was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Tolman was a counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee when they were reauthorizing the so-called "Patriot Act" in 2005-06. He reported to Snarlin' Arlen -- or at least that is what Specter believed. Specter was unaware of the Bush Regime's tight-knit "Mormon Mafia" operated by Karl Rove at the heart of the U.S. government. He learned the hard way.
One night, before passage of the bill, Tolman surreptitiously inserted a paragraph into the legislation that basically removed Senate oversight and approval of replacements for U.S. Attorneys. Tolman didn't ask Specter and didn't tell Specter or, as far as we know, any other senators. He just snuck it into the bill and none of them knew they were voting for that provision. Is that embarrassing, or what? I think so. And I think it plays a role in why the senators have been pretty mum on this episode. And what made it worse is that the Senate unanimously approved Bush's nomination of Tolman, soon after... as U.S. Attorney for Utah!
When Specter finally did discover he had been duped by Tolman and tried to get to the bottom of it, all he was told was that Tolman had acted on behalf of the Justice Department! No names. The question remains, did Rove tell Tolman to do it directly or did he use Gonzales as his messenger boy?
Today it was revealed that the Saudis have turned their backs on BushCo. That leaves one base of support, the Mormons, right? Well... not so fast. Utah may be the reddest of the red states-- and the lowest information state anywhere -- but even there things are turning around a bit. A poll in the Salt Lake City Tribune has some bad news for the Bush Regime. Like the Saudis, the Mormons have about had it with Bush's disastrous war and catastrophic occupation of Iraq.
In the survey, just 44 percent of those identifying themselves as Mormon said they backed Bush's war management. That's a level considerably higher than Bush gets from Utah's non-Mormon population and the nation at large, but it's also a 21 percentage point drop from just five months earlier.... Such abrupt moves in group opinion are uncommon. Pollsters say numbers generally move gradually, unless "spooked" by something.
Rove, who went to high school and college in Utah and first got into political campaigning working for Senator Wallace Bennett (R-UT), operates a virtual "Mormon Mafia" out of his White House office, recently uncovered by our own Karen Allen while she was investigating Kyle Sampson, another in Rove's web, for Down With Tyranny.
Oddly, after Tolman had rendered his little service to Rove at the Judiciary Committee, it appeared that Rove was backing Sampson for the U.S. Attorney gig-- although with Rove, appearances are almost always deceptive. It was Utah Senator Orrin Hatch who was behind Tolman, a protege of his, and Hatch seems to have come to terms with Rove.
A few weeks ago Karen Tumulty flagged this in Time as a potential problem for Gonzales and the Bush Regime -- twice. No one seems to have bitten. It's difficult for me to understand -- beyond their own embarrassment -- why senators, particularly those on the Judiciary Committee, have failed to haul Brett Tolman's ass in and find out who exactly gave him the order to insert the secret paragraph into the Patriot Act in the dead of night. Once that is cleared up, I believe the rest of Purge-Gate will fall into place.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FITZ!
JUSTICE!!!
Damn
And the hits just keep on comin’. FDL posters have been smokin’ today! Great job, Howie!
I contacted a very knowledgeable friend to get some advise for today’s chat and for this story. This friend– who is well known– wrote back and, among other things, said: “I think one thing I can safely say, even if this email is monitored, is that Mormons out here won’t allow you to discuss their religion in the light of day. Any critic is immediately silenced or even threatened, if only in ’soft’ ways, or called a bigot. That’s one reason they get away with so much in the public square. People out here are scared to go after them. I found that out the hard way.”
I’m thinking Doan needs a nickname after today’s performance, how about the cookie monster?
Slightly OT, but HuffPo has a link to Newsweek article of an e-mail to Rove, where he’s “Thanked” for a firing; it looks like of Iglesias in NM. It was to the RNC e-mail so didn’t jump out at folks initially….
cinqa
Tolman needs to be on the Senate witness list, under oath, absolutely.
The insertion of the Patriot Act language was the predicate act to implementing the attorney firing and DOJ politicization plan.
The surreptitious nature of the act also demonstrates the guilty knowledge by Rove et. al. that their actions could not survive scrutiny. It may be even be (prosecutor types weigh in please) evidence of criminal intent.
Here’s link to Rove story:
msnbc link
Howie - great post! I just read the Karen Allen piece on thhe Mormon-BYU old-boys-network in the WH and DoJ and–and — wait, I’m going to have to make some kinda chart to keep all this straight. It’ll have to be a big one, with lots of blank space left for the revelations to come.
I suspect you’re right, that embarassment is what’s keeping the senators quiet.
They should be embarassed at passing so many bills without even reading them!
I have no idea if Tolman did something illegal. He definitely did something worthy of being disbarred, however.
One can hope.
Hmmm. Mormon mafia. Weren’t John D. Ehrlichman, and H. R. Haldeman Mormons?
tejanarusa @ 10
I guess they count on having trustworthy staffers. Tolman certainly didn’t turn out to be and to make matters worse– so much worse– they were all– and I mean all– bamboozled into voting to confirm him as a U.S. Attorney, a job he was appointed to as a quid pro quo for his treachery against them!! Rove is the worst nightmare in the history of American politics.
John Eaton @
12
wiki has both as Christian Scientist…
“Mormon Mafia”?
My head is spinning.
There’s something rotten in the state of Utah
two beers @ 15
And yet even there they’re starting to turn on Bush. Less than half the Mormons believe his crock about Iraq anymore!
howieklein @ 4
You’re the only other person I’ve ever heard use the phrase Mormon mafia. I’ve been using it for years. I ski in UT 2-3 times per year, and familiarity breeds contempt. I know how they control UT politics & several other areas in the West, but had no idea how integrated with W they are until Purgegate. Will be interesting to hear Samson. These guys don’t usually crack. And they’re so clean cut, it’s hard for the average American to believe they’re so smarmy.
I fail to see how the insertion was illegal. At the end of the day, a majority of Senators voted for the bill.
It does, however, clarify that Senators should actually read the bills they are voting on.
howieklein @ 13
Been wondering whether we need to revisit the Hatch Act and amend it so that no “political officers” are permitted within the EOP.
Frankly, either a president already has a political agenda of their own when they are sworn in and executes it as part of the platform upon which they were elected, or not…they are not entitled to continued support on taxpayers’ dime of their party’s agenda. I resent like hell that one cent of my tax dollars has paid Karl Rove since he does not work for the people of the United States, but for the Republican base.
Professor Foland @ 18
The perfect crime–so perfect it’s not a crime.
Professor Foland @18
Can just anybody write bills? Even those not holding an elected office?
Howie Klein said:
Thank you, sir; may I have another?
eCAHNomics @ 17
And don’t forget that this whole PurgeGate scandal actually started in Guam, courtesy of, among others, John Doolittle. Anyone know if he’s a Mormon too?
Considering the Mormon ban on caffeinated beverages, do the members of the Mormon Mafia in Karl’s office gather round the kool-aid machine?
Drip….drip….drip
On a related note, stuff up on TPM about the new document dump. Don’t know if Sampson will be able to get the bus off himself before he testifies tomorrow…
Wow!!! Superb post! Haul Tolman’s butt in now. That Saudi thing is really interesting, since it was mostly THEIR citizens who appear to have financed and attacked us.
saudi link
Inserting language in a bill may not be illegal; conspiracy to abuse DOJ authority for political purposes could be (and if it isn’t, it should be)
The numbers on my scandal counter are spinning like a ceiling fan.
Great post Howie.
Keep hounding ‘em.
On the Rove connection mentioned above. From TPM Muckraker:
Muckraker
It is understandable that Senators & Representatives are very busy, and don’t have time to read every bill, but isn’t that what their aids are for?
I keep saying Bush is trying to legislate from the Oval Office. His signing statements are proof of that, no?
Oh, yes, Howie. John Doolittle is a Mormon.
Harry Reid is a Mormon.
Looking at this site– it does seem that the Republicans far outnumber Democrats.
Interesting snippet here:
http://famousmormons.net/pol.html
Professor Foland @ 18
Or at the very least they should subject the final text of the bill to an electronic diff against a previous version of the bill that they *had* read.
Part of the reason these tactics work is because they’re perpetrated at the very last minute… a little smart leverage of technology could go a long way here.
howieklein @ 4
That’s the MO. “Soft” threats, so even the victim of the threat feels silly about mentioning it. Or doing anything about it.
Why would anyone believe that Specter really did not know about this?
I don’t believe him at all. (Unless by “not knowing” he means that he was asked to look away at the appropriate moment.)
Tolman is probably thumbing his nose at Congress and the people of the US for two reasons. First, the Specter story about Tolman “slipping it in” unbenounced to Arlen is about is credible as his “single bullet theory.” I think Arlen was in on the plot (to bypass Congress on US attorneys). Second, the Dems were caught flatfooted not doing their jobs! They ALL voted on a bill that they clearly had NOT READ!! By investigating this they would only trumpet their own neglect, stupidity, laziness, culpability…..well provide your own descriptor here. The Dems don’t want to do that. They were, for the zillionth time, Charlie Brown, to the Repubs Lucy, who promised — this time– that she would not yank the football away. HA!
yep
ethinks *this* is the
underlying crime
(though I cannot conceive of describing anything about Rove as underlying
What is more important to me is that the self-righteous, honorable Arlen Specter should be the one placing Tolman on the witness list. This is something all the Senators may be embarrassed about, but I do not think they would suffer — I think it would improve Congress’s reputation if they put an end to midnight votes, failure to read the text of legislation, etc.
Mormon mafia?
Google, Lane McCotter and Abu Ghraib and see where it leads you
Hee-hee! At last Bush is learning the lesson his mother has been protecting him from all these years:”Nobody likes people that nobody likes!”
In other words of one syllable for Georgie:nobody likes mean people! Not even Mormons and Saudis!
Professor Foland @ 18
I concur
LindaR @ 32
OMG!!!! Next thing you’ll be telling me is that other corrupt slimebucket, Buck McKeon, is also a Mormon! (The guy Robert Rodriguez ran against.) Oh and speaking of McKeon, those GSA slides of Rove’s that got exposed for the whole world to see, seem to indicate that McKeon’s retiring. In fact, there’s a whole list (in the Update) of which Republicrooks are not going to seek re-election.
Mormonism -
I recall reading a tidbit a few years ago which said the Catholic Church does not recognize Mormonism as Christian.
Anyone have any facts on that?
Rayne @ 19
Rayne you are confusing the Hatch Act with the Plum Book. The Plum Book caontains the listing of allt he political appointee jobs in the governtment. It has grown to become a very weighty tome indeed. It needs to be edited.
Edited down to a pamphlet
Speaking of Charlie Brown….he is re-forming his campaign committee for 2008. He lost by 9000 votes to Doolittle in 2006.
www.charliebrownforcongress.org
Excellent post, Howie. When can we expect the Judiciary committees to pick up on this? They haven’t missed much, lately.
Wally Herger is a Mormon too, according to this website.
Ivy Baker Priest is on there, too.
sonate @ 37
Makes sense. Keep in mind though: Snarlin’ Arlen sponsored the bill to repeal and forced Bush to agree not to veto AND blew the whistle on Tolman.
SusanD @ 21
Off into the weeds here. He didn’t “write a bill” he insterted the language into the Conference Committee version of the existing bills passed by the House and Senate.
Mr. William Moschella of the Department of Justice provided the “comprehensive” language to Mr. Tolman of the Judiciary committee staff on 11/6/2005 at 10:09 p.m. Perhaps Senator Leahy could ask him. Also, Mr. Moschella refers to a Dan Collins special (probably not the same as a Tom Collins). Perhaps Senator Leahy could ask Mr. Collins where they got this idea, as well.
bdu @ 34
heck, maybe they could put “track changes” on. works for me. you could even see who made the change.
Puesto @ 43
AFAIK there are several Christian churches who do not consider LDS to be Christian. It’s a matter of what you believe “Christian” to require. At it’s loosest definition (a belief in Jesus Christ as prophet and savior) LDS certainly qualifies, but they get a bit weird around the edges for most mainstream christian religions, especially the bits about afterlife cosmology and Jesus’ post resurrection visit to the Americas.
Of course, all this is coming from a devout agnostic, so take it with a grain of salt.
howieklein @ 42
It looks like McKeon is a Mormon too, yes, according to that website.
Tithonia @ 45
We had Charlie on a few weeks ago and started collecting donations for him. Our Blue America page is Charlie Brown country.
From the Igelsias smear campaign (h/t digby):
Dozens of taxpayer funded junkets around the world. Among sane people, that’s actually known as: serving your country as a member of the National Guard.
These people are disgusting.
looseheadprop @ 44
IANAL, but I’m pretty sure it’s this bit I want changed:
I want the exemption GONE. And I’m absolutely certain that the Republicans would not want the Democratic president to have a zampolit on staff, paid for on their dime, if both Congress and the EOP go Dem in 2008.
edit: although winnowing down the Plum Book is a nice concept, too; I’d like people working for us to be there because of their competence, not their politics.
Does anyone know who inserted the language into the legislation removing the SIGIR (Stuart Bowen)?
I know that his term has been extended (thank you Senator Feingold), but I still want to know…
BTW it would be sad and irresponsible to see this thread degenerate into Mormon bashing. I actually like the economy and alliterative punch of Howie’s “mormon mafia” term and have no problem with it whatsoever.
However, let’s be thoughtful and not drift into bigotry. We are better than that.
howieklein @ 48
I think it just goes to show that Arlen don’t like being made to look an even bigger fool than he does on his own…
TiredFed @ 51
It’s true, though this requires some honesty on the part of the people making the edits. The reason I suggested the diffs are because they can work without the complicity of the people editing the bill.
two beers @
15
We know there is a ray of hope in Utah. It’s name is Rocky Anderson.
Oh come on, I cannot believe that slipping in language the night before the deadline without pointing out the change is acceptable SOP in any venue, let alone the Senate. If I did that with any ad copy, etc, I’d be kicked to the curb in a nano-second.
I can understand out a con victim might be embarrassed, but really, it was a CON. Like adding a zero to a check amount before or after it had been signed.
And thanks Howie, ITA with your sentiments on Rove. I commented elsewhere about a comparison to Goering and possibly J. Edgar Hoover…the game’s the thing.
Rocky is amazing. The people he serves are very lucky to have him!
looseheadprop @ 50
and this certainly could be illegal. only provisions that are not in agreement between the two versions of a bill are amenable to change in a conference committee. was this one? and if not illegal, it may have violated House and/or Senate rules. should someone who did so be eligible to retain his position as a U. S. Attorney? Only Congress knows.
Scarecrow @ 46
I’m very perplexed about this to be honest. I think I smell a deal to play this down. Maybe that’s why Bush agreed to not veto the bill repealing this stuff– which has passed both Houses overwhelmingly. Only 2 Republicans in the Senate voted against it. In the House– where the deer and the antelope and the dangerously psychotic roam– there were 78 Republicans against, but even among those kooks, the majority of Repugs voted to repeal! Of course, all our favorite Republicrooks from Mean Jean and Marilyn Musgrave and Michele Bachmann and John Doolittle, to Robin Hayes and Mary Bono… they were all part of the 78 nuts who voted not to repeal. Who’da thunk?
Rayne @ 56
looseheadprop @ 44
IANAL, but I’m pretty sure it’s this bit I want changed:
I want the exemption GONE. And I’m absolutely certain that the Republicans would not want the Democratic president to have a zampolit on staff, paid for on their dime, if both Congress and the EOP go Dem in 2008.
edit: although winnowing down the Plum Book is a nice concept, too; I’d like people working for us to be there because of their competence, not their politics.
Oh, I thought you said you wanted political appointees gone from the Office of the President.
BTW, the loosening up of the Hatch Act was done under Cliton after Al Gore got in trouble for making fundraising phone calls from government property.
When I first began working for the federal government, the hatch Act itself was stricter and DOJ tended to interpret it in the toughest possible sense.
basically you could vote, and read the newspaper to decide who to vote for (Ok, OK,
looseheadprop @ 49
Kinda like the clerk in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific making corporations a person?
Wasn’t it the clerk? Now that I think about it, I’ve read two versions where one said the Chief Justice did it or approved it, and the clerk just going ahead and inserting the language in the other.
Just up at TPM:
“Hmmm. Looks like the new document dump may contain some bad emails for the White House. More soon.”
Evidently the plum book is online up until 2004.
More importantly: Why isn’t Rove in jail?
John Dean says he has a source that calls him both Haldeman and Erlichman rolled into one… (that must account for his current size).
Puesto @
44
I can answer that - it came up in an RCIA class I took some years ago -The Catholic Church does not consider LDS a Christian church.
And, at the risk of sounding biased - how could it be? It’s not a Christian belief that Jesus came to North America, that the lost tribes of Israel wound up here, and that anybody after Jesus (e.g., Joseph Smith) was a prophet with a direct line of dictation from God.
as you probably know, the mayor of Salt Lake City recently callled for Bush’s impeachment.
What would really rock is if one of these guys turns out to be a polygamist……
looseheadprop, point taken. It’s always a challenge to pay attention to that. Of course, the first recourse of a bully called on his bullytude is to call for liberal application of his victim’s sense of fairness.
looseheadprop @ 59
Is truth a defense against the charge of bigotry?
As I understand, Tolman was a plant forced on Spector by the Republicans because they didn’t trust him — a political commissar forced on the elected legislature by the party apparatus. This is how things happen in totalitarian countries or mobbed-up unions (”Moe here is the new vice-president from the national headquarters…..”).
Spector’s reputation is shot. I believe that 10 or twenty years ago he may actually have been a free agent and and an independent thinker, but he’s totally beaten now, and he’s too old to recuperate or fight back. Just a waste of a man.
Spector showed up in the first tape dump as an administration lackey too.
looseheadprop @ 42
What if there were evidence that the plan to secretly amend the Act was part of a larger Rove plan to facilitate the removal of US Attys who were pushing Republican prosecutions. Does that change your conclusion?
howieklein @ 65
Howie, I didn’t pay attention to the vote tally’s aren’t you describing a veto proof majority? I realize votes could change in the override motion, but….?
eCAHNomics @
17
Yes, but is Sampson a li’l bit country? Or is he a li’l bit rock’n'roll?
looseheadprop @ 50
It’s normal for committee staff to “write” the actual language that gets inserted into bills. Someone has to type it in, or hand the leg counsel a note describing what to type in.
New Mexicans For Honest Courts on Iglesias…
Dozens of taxpayer funded junkets around the world. Among sane people, that’s actually known as: serving your country as a member of the National Guard.
These people are disgusting.
I disagree. “Disgusting” is much too kind. These [expletive deleted] turds are not worthy to be scraped off the bottom of our shoes!!! Is there any way to push back on this? How about a radio ad naming specific members of “New Mexicans For Honest Courts” and call them “LIARS AND TRAITORS”
looseheadprop @ 59
Whoops - sorry if my response sounded bigoted. Probably gave Too Much Information.
(I was once fascinated enough by LDS to try to read the Book of Mormon, rather admired them..ahem..my view has changed. won’t say more here. sorry, sorry.)
howieklein @ 66
Bush does not veto bills. He uses signing statements. It’s a cowardly approach, but he is a coward.
John Emerson @ 76
Specter has been a chump longer than that. The Repubs have been trying to primary him forever. They almost suceeded two years ago. It’s a shame they didn’t suceed.
From the AZ Republic:
WASHINGTON - Eight federal prosecutors were fired last year because they did not sufficiently support President Bush’s priorities, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ former chief of staff says in remarks prepared for delivery Thursday to Congress.
“The distinction between political’ and performance-related’ reasons for removing a United States attorney is, in my view, largely artificial,” said Kyle Sampson. The aide, who quit because of the furor over the firings, is to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. A copy of his prepared remarks was obtained Wednesday by the Associated Press.
“A U.S. attorney who is unsuccessful from a political perspective … is unsuccessful,” Sampson said. Democrats have described the firings as an “intimidation by purge” and a warning to remaining U.S. attorneys to fall in line with Bush’s priorities. Political pressure, Democrats say, can skew the judgment of prosecutors when deciding whom to investigate and which indictments to pursue.
….
Link
lol! He’s a li’l bit roly poly……..
looseheadprop @ 76
Great observation. They are veto-proof. But if the Regime would have fought this and signaled the House, I guarantee you more than 78 of the wingnuts would have voted against repeal. Take Adam Putnam (Howdy Doody). He voted for repeal but if the White House would have done one of their “calling all wingnuts” memos, he would have been screaming his makeup-caked little face off about how voting for repeal would be undermining our boys in Iraq.
This from TPM:
Isn’t that so Clintonian?
From the AP just now, Sampson:
So, it seems to me this is his strategy. Just say it outright and defend it. Hmmm…
It seems the heat is building on e-mails from Domenici’s staff saying “Thanks” and which e-mails went to “private” e-mail boxes, instead of Whithouse…
I suppose its possible that Arlen didn’t know that Tolman had inserted the USA provision in the Patriot Act. Those bills are heavy, even for lawyers to read quickly.
But Specter is a slimy lying SOB. I will never forget the way he treated Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas SCOTUS conformation hearings. I am still pissed off to this day, and that f*cker will never get on my good side. (Norwegians can hold a grudge, just FYI)
AZ Matt @
85
Link
Speechless, with jaw dropped…
I can’t believe this guy is a lawyer, much less a former appeals court clerk…further words fail me…
1,468 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
Citizen Klein and the Firepup Patriots:
It’s time to start lookin’ at the tax exemption of a bunch of organized churches in this country…in my opinion, they all (including my Unitarian Universalist alma matter) should lose their status. It wouldn’t hurt the small, honestly religious folks and their local churches ‘cuz they ain’t gotta pot ta pee in anywayz and the after deduction “profits” would be marginal.
A pox on all of their houses…it is bein’ proven once again that organized religion is a bane not a boon to life on this planet. Take away their tax exemptions and file RICO charges against the whole lot of the bastards.
KEEP THE FAITH AND GET THAT SHIT OUTTA MY YARD!!!
eCAHNomics @
88
It must be contagious. Waxman smacked down Ms Doan during the hearings today when she started parsing words on what constituted a “briefing” that she was being “Clintonian.”
The traffic has diminished here, so I can take some bandwidth to congratulate you on the post Howie. I’ve been fuming about this since I first heard about it. Great job.
looseheadprop @
59
Exactly!
Gabe Castillo is wicked smart, and a really great fantastic guy who spent a lot of his own money (I mean a lot) to finance his campaign for Congress in 2004 against Dan Lungren in Ca. CD-4
And he’s just like every other Mormon I know
Excepting the Conman John Do Little
Remember when there was a question whether Arlen Specter would retain his chairmanship because of his so-called “independence” — Tolman must have been the “minder” assigned to him as a condition of not being replaced.
Me thinks that perhaps Mr. Sampson will be in a world of hurt tomorrow. He is an arrogant little snot isn’t he.
Bye, bye Kyle… .
Puesto @ 89
There’s still no management record–no warning that USA was not following W priorities with a given time to change or be fired. I can see it now: Ms. Lam, in order to be a good USA, you must stop the Cunningham investigation immediately.
Not contagion–plagarism.