<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crooks&#8217;R&#039;Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:29:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taninc</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-589770</link>
		<dc:creator>Taninc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-589770</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-587026&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mrs. K8 @&lt;br /&gt;
                81              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-587023&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Solai @ 79&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;OT-I’m getting pretty good at the abbreviations used but what is “*g*”?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“grin”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mrs. K8:  On behalf of many of us net neophytes Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-587026"><em>Mrs. K8 @<br />
                81              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-587023"><em>Solai @ 79</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>OT-I’m getting pretty good at the abbreviations used but what is “*g*”?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“grin”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mrs. K8:  On behalf of many of us net neophytes Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587820</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-587034&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;maunga @&lt;br /&gt;
                88              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-587020&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RagingGurrl @ 76&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Attack Iran? With what troops? With what money? Loose change found under the cushions in the Oval Office couch?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just airplanes screaming off thoise decks, and tyhe big uys coming in from Diego Garcia, no boots on the ground, so meaningless, designbed just inflame the Iranians.  The Goons just do not know how big Iran and how strong.  The response wuill be that they in turn flatten the oil installations on the other side of the Gulf, from the top — kuwait, the Sa’udi fields, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Oman.  Watch this economy collapse……&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This just reminded me of the burning oil wells during Gulf War I and it made me think that maybe it wasn’t Saddam who burned them. After all, isn’t it the Bush policy to cut back on oil supply to keep the price up?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-587034"><em>maunga @<br />
                88              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-587020"><em>RagingGurrl @ 76</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Attack Iran? With what troops? With what money? Loose change found under the cushions in the Oval Office couch?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just airplanes screaming off thoise decks, and tyhe big uys coming in from Diego Garcia, no boots on the ground, so meaningless, designbed just inflame the Iranians.  The Goons just do not know how big Iran and how strong.  The response wuill be that they in turn flatten the oil installations on the other side of the Gulf, from the top — kuwait, the Sa’udi fields, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Oman.  Watch this economy collapse……</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This just reminded me of the burning oil wells during Gulf War I and it made me think that maybe it wasn’t Saddam who burned them. After all, isn’t it the Bush policy to cut back on oil supply to keep the price up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Mitch</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587807</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Glad to see that the Washington post picked up on this. When I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://schapira.blogspot.com/2007/03/jack-abramoff-is-this-generations.html&quot;&gt;Jack Abramoff is this generation’s Alexander Butterfield&lt;/a&gt; the only one carrying the story was the Financial Times of London. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Visit the Schapira blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://schapira.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;What we know so far …&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that the Washington post picked up on this. When I wrote <a href="http://schapira.blogspot.com/2007/03/jack-abramoff-is-this-generations.html">Jack Abramoff is this generation’s Alexander Butterfield</a> the only one carrying the story was the Financial Times of London. </p>
<p>Visit the Schapira blog, <a href="http://schapira.blogspot.com">What we know so far …</a></p>
<p>“… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee5</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587800</link>
		<dc:creator>lee5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;FishGuyDave @ 27&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;it is possible to physically damage computer hard-drives so that the data is unrecoverable … shouldn’t … Rep. Waxman’s committee also be interested in physically securing the servers …&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sure, but at this point, any losing the data is almost as bad as letting us see it. It’ll be really suspicious if all the servers are suddenly wiped and there’s no backups. Esp’ly after Waxman has asked about ‘em. I’d almost love to see them pull that. As good as admitting guilt. Esp’ly cause the files will then turn up somewhere else …&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FishGuyDave @ 27</p>
<blockquote><p>it is possible to physically damage computer hard-drives so that the data is unrecoverable … shouldn’t … Rep. Waxman’s committee also be interested in physically securing the servers …</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, but at this point, any losing the data is almost as bad as letting us see it. It’ll be really suspicious if all the servers are suddenly wiped and there’s no backups. Esp’ly after Waxman has asked about ‘em. I’d almost love to see them pull that. As good as admitting guilt. Esp’ly cause the files will then turn up somewhere else …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Juan Island Artist</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587367</link>
		<dc:creator>San Juan Island Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587367</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;signature @37&lt;br /&gt;
According to my graphology book, Handwriting Analysis”……&lt;br /&gt;
“Overinflated upper loops&lt;br /&gt;
inticates delusional thinking, not in line with reality”&lt;br /&gt;
And this,&lt;br /&gt;
“Widely inflated or swollen upper loops are a sign of overcompensation for feelings of intellectual inferiority and an emotional need for constant reassurance. the bloated upper zone writer resorts to exaggeration and boastfulness to compensate for his/her low self opinion. His/Her boasts, of course are based on fantasy.”&lt;br /&gt;
I’ll see what I can find on those strange heart things in the signature&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>signature @37<br />
According to my graphology book, Handwriting Analysis”……<br />
“Overinflated upper loops<br />
inticates delusional thinking, not in line with reality”<br />
And this,<br />
“Widely inflated or swollen upper loops are a sign of overcompensation for feelings of intellectual inferiority and an emotional need for constant reassurance. the bloated upper zone writer resorts to exaggeration and boastfulness to compensate for his/her low self opinion. His/Her boasts, of course are based on fantasy.”<br />
I’ll see what I can find on those strange heart things in the signature</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Foland</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587344</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Foland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587344</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why do all roads seem to lead back to Casino Jack?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because Native American tribes are the only US entity that have no legal limit on the total amount of money they can donate to political campaigns.  (They must still follow donation limits for individual candidates and campaigns, but they have no limits on the total amount over all individuals.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why do all roads seem to lead back to Casino Jack?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Because Native American tribes are the only US entity that have no legal limit on the total amount of money they can donate to political campaigns.  (They must still follow donation limits for individual candidates and campaigns, but they have no limits on the total amount over all individuals.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: portia.vz</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587319</link>
		<dc:creator>portia.vz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587319</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-587202&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;RagingGurrl @&lt;br /&gt;
                121              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-587131&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;portia.vz @&lt;br /&gt;
                118              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;What&lt;/b&gt; fighting back?  If someone drops a bomb on you, you spend your time trying to overcome the shock, dealing with the survivors and putting your cities back into some serviceable order.  Retaliation will consist of the mobilization of your religious brotherhood in every other country of the world taking revenge on your behalf.&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, this is what we know will be the result of any foolish move on Cheney’s part to bomb Iran.  We will become instant targets of terrorism.  Any time an american has to travel overseas, he/she will be an instant target for islamic terrorism.  I have a business trip to France in June and I am not looking forward to being an walking bullseye.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You believe no Iranians will fight back? Really?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s sort of like the run up to the Iraq war.  Sure, they will eventually fight back.  But it’s not like they are going to be able to invade us.  The fighting will happen over there in Iraq-Iran.  The terrorists, OTOH, will be all over the place and more motivated than ever.  I think we should expect to see a lot of attacks in the US and whereever there are concentrations of Americans around the globe.  We’ll be trapped in our own country.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-587202"><em>RagingGurrl @<br />
                121              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-587131"><em>portia.vz @<br />
                118              </em></a></p>
<p><b>What</b> fighting back?  If someone drops a bomb on you, you spend your time trying to overcome the shock, dealing with the survivors and putting your cities back into some serviceable order.  Retaliation will consist of the mobilization of your religious brotherhood in every other country of the world taking revenge on your behalf.<br />
Ok, this is what we know will be the result of any foolish move on Cheney’s part to bomb Iran.  We will become instant targets of terrorism.  Any time an american has to travel overseas, he/she will be an instant target for islamic terrorism.  I have a business trip to France in June and I am not looking forward to being an walking bullseye.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>.<br />
.</p>
<p>You believe no Iranians will fight back? Really?</p>
<p>It’s sort of like the run up to the Iraq war.  Sure, they will eventually fight back.  But it’s not like they are going to be able to invade us.  The fighting will happen over there in Iraq-Iran.  The terrorists, OTOH, will be all over the place and more motivated than ever.  I think we should expect to see a lot of attacks in the US and whereever there are concentrations of Americans around the globe.  We’ll be trapped in our own country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuggyQ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587300</link>
		<dc:creator>BuggyQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587300</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They don’t want it on Good Friday.  They want it on my BIRTHDAY!  They want to ruin my favorite celebration for all eternity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bastards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don’t want it on Good Friday.  They want it on my BIRTHDAY!  They want to ruin my favorite celebration for all eternity. </p>
<p>Bastards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEP</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587216</link>
		<dc:creator>JEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587216</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On thread, is there any way Waxman and Congress can empanel new investigative committees, or grand juries, to get to the bottom of each of these myriad issues?  We have a full plate of corruption before us, it’s a ten-course meal, with Impeachment for desert, but Waxman’s the only chef in the kitchen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can Congress separate these duties down to smaller, issue-dedicated investigations that can EACH hold subpoena powers through Waxman’s committee?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems to me we need to re-instate the “Special Prosecutor” position, particularly when dealing with the DOJ. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s something from to that effect from NYTimes Op-Ed Contributor NEAL KATYAL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“IN 1999, when the Independent Counsel Act (the law that gave Kenneth Starr and Lawrence Walsh their mandates) was expiring, I was given the job of writing the new Justice Department rules for the appointment of a special prosecutor since the department would once again be responsible for overseeing such investigations. There was one hypothetical to worry about once the Independent Counsel Act lapsed: a case in which the attorney general…(is)…suspected of possible misconduct. The rules were therefore written to vest the decision about whether to appoint a special prosecutor in the top Justice Department official not embroiled in the controversy. Today, the only way to get to the bottom of the United States attorney scandal — which involved the administration’s firing of nearly 10 percent of America’s top prosecutors — is to use these rules and appoint a special prosecutor.&lt;br /&gt;
The nightmare has now come true.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/opinion/27katyal.html&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03.....atyal.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On thread, is there any way Waxman and Congress can empanel new investigative committees, or grand juries, to get to the bottom of each of these myriad issues?  We have a full plate of corruption before us, it’s a ten-course meal, with Impeachment for desert, but Waxman’s the only chef in the kitchen.</p>
<p>Can Congress separate these duties down to smaller, issue-dedicated investigations that can EACH hold subpoena powers through Waxman’s committee?</p>
<p>Seems to me we need to re-instate the “Special Prosecutor” position, particularly when dealing with the DOJ. </p>
<p>Here’s something from to that effect from NYTimes Op-Ed Contributor NEAL KATYAL</p>
<p>“IN 1999, when the Independent Counsel Act (the law that gave Kenneth Starr and Lawrence Walsh their mandates) was expiring, I was given the job of writing the new Justice Department rules for the appointment of a special prosecutor since the department would once again be responsible for overseeing such investigations. There was one hypothetical to worry about once the Independent Counsel Act lapsed: a case in which the attorney general…(is)…suspected of possible misconduct. The rules were therefore written to vest the decision about whether to appoint a special prosecutor in the top Justice Department official not embroiled in the controversy. Today, the only way to get to the bottom of the United States attorney scandal — which involved the administration’s firing of nearly 10 percent of America’s top prosecutors — is to use these rules and appoint a special prosecutor.<br />
The nightmare has now come true.”<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/27/opinion/27katyal.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03&#8230;..atyal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587211</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/27/crooksrus-2/#comment-587211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But WH staffers don’t need to be under oath or have a transcript of their testimony, oh NO….&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But WH staffers don’t need to be under oath or have a transcript of their testimony, oh NO….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
