<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The People&#8217;s Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:35:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nolo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585248</link>
		<dc:creator>nolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i may be late to this party,&lt;br /&gt;
but it seems that gonzo’s senior&lt;br /&gt;
counselor, one monica goodling, has&lt;br /&gt;
informed senator leahy’s staff this&lt;br /&gt;
afternoon that she will take the 5th&lt;br /&gt;
when questioned by the senate judiciary&lt;br /&gt;
committee at hearings this thursday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;this is &lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;significant on several fronts&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;d. kyle sampson, the AG’s former chief&lt;br /&gt;
of staff, has indicated that he &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;will&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
speak, under oath, to the committee&lt;br /&gt;
about various matters related to purge-gate. . . &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;we now know that mr. sampson will likely say,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;under oath&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, that he did &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;not mislead mr. gonzales&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tantalizingly, he may say quite a bit &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;so, we &lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;now know &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;that the other putative “fall-&lt;br /&gt;
person” for mr. gonzales, ms. goodling, will not go&lt;br /&gt;
quietly.  her invocation of the fifth will likely&lt;br /&gt;
simply be a precursor to an agreement under which&lt;br /&gt;
she will ultimately testify, in return for immunity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is an unusual sign — and not an encourag-&lt;br /&gt;
ing one — for the target, at least, when&lt;br /&gt;
one of the target’s lawyers — his senior&lt;br /&gt;
lawyer, in this case — decides to invoke&lt;br /&gt;
a fifth amendment privilege against self-&lt;br /&gt;
incriminantion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i write this because it suggests, to me, that&lt;br /&gt;
the target, here mr. gonzales, is going to have&lt;br /&gt;
quite a bit of difficulty asserting that he&lt;br /&gt;
simply followed good faith legal advice he&lt;br /&gt;
sought and received from his staff, related&lt;br /&gt;
to the dismissal of the eight u.s. attorneys.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;we already know that various public documents&lt;br /&gt;
contradict mr. gonzales’ earlier claim that he&lt;br /&gt;
“&lt;i&gt;wasn’t very involved&lt;/i&gt;” in the decision to&lt;br /&gt;
ask for the resignations of these eight u.s. attorneys.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;all of this is shaping up very badly for mr.&lt;br /&gt;
gonzales — &lt;b&gt;but is quite predictably — almost&lt;br /&gt;
uncannily — providing much “noisy cover” and&lt;br /&gt;
precious time-delays, for messrs. rove and cheney.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://indictdickcheney.blogspot.com/2007/03/gonzos-senior-counselor-to-invoke-5th.html&quot;&gt;more here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i may be late to this party,<br />
but it seems that gonzo’s senior<br />
counselor, one monica goodling, has<br />
informed senator leahy’s staff this<br />
afternoon that she will take the 5th<br />
when questioned by the senate judiciary<br />
committee at hearings this thursday.</p>
<p>this is <b><em>significant on several fronts</em></b>:</p>
<p>d. kyle sampson, the AG’s former chief<br />
of staff, has indicated that he <em><strong>will</strong></em><br />
speak, under oath, to the committee<br />
about various matters related to purge-gate. . . </p>
<p>we now know that mr. sampson will likely say,<br />
<em><strong>under oath</strong></em>, that he did <em><strong>not mislead mr. gonzales</strong></em>.</p>
<p>tantalizingly, he may say quite a bit <em><strong>more</strong></em>.</p>
<p>so, we <b><em>now know </em></b>that the other putative “fall-<br />
person” for mr. gonzales, ms. goodling, will not go<br />
quietly.  her invocation of the fifth will likely<br />
simply be a precursor to an agreement under which<br />
she will ultimately testify, in return for immunity.</p>
<p>it is an unusual sign — and not an encourag-<br />
ing one — for the target, at least, when<br />
one of the target’s lawyers — his senior<br />
lawyer, in this case — decides to invoke<br />
a fifth amendment privilege against self-<br />
incriminantion.</p>
<p>i write this because it suggests, to me, that<br />
the target, here mr. gonzales, is going to have<br />
quite a bit of difficulty asserting that he<br />
simply followed good faith legal advice he<br />
sought and received from his staff, related<br />
to the dismissal of the eight u.s. attorneys.</p>
<p>we already know that various public documents<br />
contradict mr. gonzales’ earlier claim that he<br />
“<i>wasn’t very involved</i>” in the decision to<br />
ask for the resignations of these eight u.s. attorneys.</p>
<p>all of this is shaping up very badly for mr.<br />
gonzales — <b>but is quite predictably — almost<br />
uncannily — providing much “noisy cover” and<br />
precious time-delays, for messrs. rove and cheney.</b></p>
<p><a href="http://indictdickcheney.blogspot.com/2007/03/gonzos-senior-counselor-to-invoke-5th.html">more here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEP</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585052</link>
		<dc:creator>JEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-584836&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Swan @ 163 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Go back to Newt’s contract on America, and research the purchase of big newspapers and other media outlets then, and back a bit further just after Clinto beat Bush Sr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These editors and publishers aren’t being threatened, THEY ARE THE ONES WHOMAKE THE THREATS!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best example, right off the top, Tony Blankley and Sun M’Yung Moon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We watched it happed right here in Kansas, a fairly balanced but slightly liberal newspaper editor in a nearby small prairie city (50,000 people) was replaced by a very conservative editor, despite the fact the writers and reporters were quite fair and balanced,in the real sense of the cliche’.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was a well-orchestrated plan to take control of the media, and Clinton’s impeachment debacle was the first fruits of this industry-wide buy-out. If not for the blogs, and a few hardy, heartfelt souls like Molly Ivins, I can not imagine where we would be today…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-584836"><em>Swan @ 163 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?</p>
<p>It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Go back to Newt’s contract on America, and research the purchase of big newspapers and other media outlets then, and back a bit further just after Clinto beat Bush Sr.</p>
<p>These editors and publishers aren’t being threatened, THEY ARE THE ONES WHOMAKE THE THREATS!!!</p>
<p>Best example, right off the top, Tony Blankley and Sun M’Yung Moon.</p>
<p>We watched it happed right here in Kansas, a fairly balanced but slightly liberal newspaper editor in a nearby small prairie city (50,000 people) was replaced by a very conservative editor, despite the fact the writers and reporters were quite fair and balanced,in the real sense of the cliche’.</p>
<p>This was a well-orchestrated plan to take control of the media, and Clinton’s impeachment debacle was the first fruits of this industry-wide buy-out. If not for the blogs, and a few hardy, heartfelt souls like Molly Ivins, I can not imagine where we would be today…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEP</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585034</link>
		<dc:creator>JEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-584852&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;gW @ 164 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;As someone noted, George Will’s quote will come as a surprise to anyone who read his stuff circa 92-2000.  Not that a double stadards are anything new to Will, but it would be fun to dig out some of his vicious stuff on Clinton and line it up against that quote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garrison Keilor coined the phrase, “The Republicans made their peace with hypocrisy long ago!”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-584852"><em>gW @ 164 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>As someone noted, George Will’s quote will come as a surprise to anyone who read his stuff circa 92-2000.  Not that a double stadards are anything new to Will, but it would be fun to dig out some of his vicious stuff on Clinton and line it up against that quote.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Garrison Keilor coined the phrase, “The Republicans made their peace with hypocrisy long ago!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEP</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585029</link>
		<dc:creator>JEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585029</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-584942&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Diana @ 166 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alas, just another diversion from the real issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People are dying, Democrats keep grandstanding while cutting Bush a big fat check to continue the war, and you all keep blahblahblahBLAH-ging about pointless things. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You give Rove way too much credit.  He’s a nobody.  Stop making him a somebody.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but Rove’s was involved in the very foundation of the cabal that led us to war.  If he’s guilty of anything else, it is that his political machinations guaranteed we would “elect” warmongers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I suspect his culpability goes much deeper than that.  Until he is forced to testify under oath, I can only speculate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-584942"><em>Diana @ 166 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Alas, just another diversion from the real issue.</p>
<p>People are dying, Democrats keep grandstanding while cutting Bush a big fat check to continue the war, and you all keep blahblahblahBLAH-ging about pointless things. </p>
<p>You give Rove way too much credit.  He’s a nobody.  Stop making him a somebody.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry, but Rove’s was involved in the very foundation of the cabal that led us to war.  If he’s guilty of anything else, it is that his political machinations guaranteed we would “elect” warmongers.</p>
<p>But I suspect his culpability goes much deeper than that.  Until he is forced to testify under oath, I can only speculate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEP</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585023</link>
		<dc:creator>JEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585023</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The remaining Republicans are circling their collective wagons, because they see a disaster of historic proportions on the event horizon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The future will find their Grand Old Party sporting a sad and eduring footnote of shame, that historians will study then much like those today study The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Super-power, indeed!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The remaining Republicans are circling their collective wagons, because they see a disaster of historic proportions on the event horizon.</p>
<p>The future will find their Grand Old Party sporting a sad and eduring footnote of shame, that historians will study then much like those today study The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire.</p>
<p>Super-power, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas78</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585021</link>
		<dc:creator>Veritas78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-585021</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;RICO statutes. The entire Republican apparatus is vulnerable to prosecution under RICO. It is an organized criminal conspiracy. Think about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RICO statutes. The entire Republican apparatus is vulnerable to prosecution under RICO. It is an organized criminal conspiracy. Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584942</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584942</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Alas, just another diversion from the real issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People are dying, Democrats keep grandstanding while cutting Bush a big fat check to continue the war, and you all keep blahblahblahBLAH-ging about pointless things. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You give Rove way too much credit.  He’s a nobody.  Stop making him a somebody.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, just another diversion from the real issue.</p>
<p>People are dying, Democrats keep grandstanding while cutting Bush a big fat check to continue the war, and you all keep blahblahblahBLAH-ging about pointless things. </p>
<p>You give Rove way too much credit.  He’s a nobody.  Stop making him a somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wlgriffi</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584900</link>
		<dc:creator>wlgriffi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Members of Congress now face a choice: whether they will waste time and provoke an unnecessary confrontation, or whether they will join us in working to do the people’s business.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Bush is so concerned about wasted time someone should point out that can be avoided by his co-operating with the Congress. Prompt and complete supplying requested information and speedy testifying by  White House flunkies will lessen time wasted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Members of Congress now face a choice: whether they will waste time and provoke an unnecessary confrontation, or whether they will join us in working to do the people’s business.”</p>
<p>If Bush is so concerned about wasted time someone should point out that can be avoided by his co-operating with the Congress. Prompt and complete supplying requested information and speedy testifying by  White House flunkies will lessen time wasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gW</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584852</link>
		<dc:creator>gW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As someone noted, George Will’s quote will come as a surprise to anyone who read his stuff circa 92-2000.  Not that a double stadards are anything new to Will, but it would be fun to dig out some of his vicious stuff on Clinton and line it up against that quote.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone noted, George Will’s quote will come as a surprise to anyone who read his stuff circa 92-2000.  Not that a double stadards are anything new to Will, but it would be fun to dig out some of his vicious stuff on Clinton and line it up against that quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swan</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584836</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/26/the-peoples-business/#comment-584836</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?</p>
<p>It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
