badpenny.jpg

Oh, Cathie Martin.  How is it that you always seem to end up in the middle of the smarmy mess?  You turn up in the latest release of DOJ e-mails:

The e-mails also show that administration officials struggled to find a way to justify the firings and considered citing immigration enforcement simply because three of the fired prosecutors were stationed near the border with Mexico. While the e-mails don't provide evidence of partisan motives for the firings, they seem to undercut the administration's explanation that the prosecutors were dismissed for poor performance.

"The one common link here is that three of them are along the southern border so you could make the connection that DOJ is unhappy with the immigration prosecution numbers in those districts," Tasia Scolinos, a senior public affairs specialist at the Justice Department, told Catherine Martin, a White House communications adviser, in an e-mail.

Guess that move from Vice President Cheney's office over to the White House press office didn't exactly raise the ethics quota for you, now did it?  And nothing like stringing together an after the fact justification for your actions, is there, folks with a finger in the Turdblossom pie? Especially when you have a lovely minion like Cathie ready to sell it to the willing enablers inside the Beltway. ("Mr. Russert, there's a call for you on Line One.")  While we're looking at this, just why is the DoJ liaison with the WH press office taking a sudden leave of absence?  Hmmmm?

Here's hoping that the folks at C&L are right, and that Leahy and Schumer do have a few disgruntled DoJ employee aces up their sleeves for testimony on this issue.  Because sunshine is more than needed in this mess, right about now.

And perhaps they can explain the following from Katymine:

…why are DOJ employees using Yahoo email addy?

Christy…. can you address the issue of government employees using NON gov. email addresses for Government business?

Anyone want an eyeopener on poor business practices put into government emails go take a gander. Didn’t anyone learn appropriate business language? Some of these people sound totally inept.

Yes, I'd like to know the answer to that myself. And oughtn't all those DoJ employees and the folks in Rove's Shop, among many, many others, start coughing up all their extraneous e-mail addresses. You know, the ones from the RNC, from yahoo, and everywhere else in between. Because I'm getting a whole "discussion off the books" feeling from these people that needs some serious explanation.  And while we are at it, just how, exactly, is an e-mail discussion waged in non-governmental e-mails protected by Executive Privilege?  Enquiring minds, Karl.  (And loopholes that work both ways, I'm afraid.  Remind me again why my taxes are paying your salary, Mr. Expensive Political Smarm Merchant.)

McClatchy has done some heavy lifting and combed through the politicization angle with a fine-toothed comb.

Last April, while the Justice Department and the White House were planning the firings, Rove gave a speech in Washington to the Republican National Lawyers Association. He ticked off 11 states that he said could be pivotal in the 2008 elections. Bush has appointed new U.S. attorneys in nine of them since 2005: Florida, Colorado, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Arkansas, Michigan, Nevada and New Mexico. U.S. attorneys in the latter four were among those fired.

Rove thanked the audience for "all that you are doing in those hot spots around the country to ensure that the integrity of the ballot is protected." He added, "A lot in American politics is up for grabs."

The department's civil rights division, for example, supported a Georgia voter identification law that a court later said discriminated against poor, minority voters. It also declined to oppose an unusual Texas redistricting plan that helped expand the Republican majority in the House of Representatives. That plan was partially reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Frank DiMarino, a former federal prosecutor who served six U.S. attorneys in Florida and Georgia during an 18-year Justice Department career, said that too much emphasis on voter fraud investigations "smacks of trying to use prosecutorial power to investigate and potentially indict political enemies."

Several former voting rights lawyers, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of antagonizing the administration, said the division's political appointees reversed the recommendations of career lawyers in key cases and transferred or drove out most of the unit's veteran attorneys.

Guess McClatchy's reporters can also do "the math."   I swear, the more I dig into this story, the more it reeks of Turdblossom Special.

Bob Geiger has some doozy cartoons for today on the US Attorney issue.  And speaking of folks who keep turning up, Gonzales' fingerprints on approval are all over the latest round of docudump bits.  Funny that they would turn up in the hands of folks in Congress while Gonzales is out of town, isn't it?  (The shop working overtime for you this week, Karl?)  Reader Kevster caught a great interview clip from Gonzales.  The WaPo has some background on Margaret Chiara of Michigan — hint:  she was well liked by the federal judges for having integrity.  Those pesky Democrats in Congress also want to be certain that the DoJ didn't tank the warrantless wiretapping investigation to play CYA for Gonzales.  (Darn them, and their need to actually DO oversight, eh, George?)  All in all, it's shaping up to be another interesting week ahead.

If you are still asking yourself, "Okay, what's the big deal about all of this?", have I got a bit for you from TPM.  Read this from Josh, let it sink in, and then ask yourself just how many lies an Administration gets to tell the public, and the Congress, before no one ought to trust them at all?  (My answer:  we passed my limit a long, long time ago.)

It is well past time for some accountability on this issue.  Testimony.  Under oath.  In public.  Because, as a voter in this nation, I have a right to know what is being done in my name — and subverting our nation's system of justice IS my business.  Now, bring on the sunshine.

(Who knew there is a whole genre of "sexploitation mystery comedy" films?)

PS:  I haven't had time to work this into a post this weekend, but this op-ed about national security letters definitely needs a read and some thought.

Related posts:

  1. AGAG To Teach Political Science Fiction At Texas Tech
  2. Gonzales and Bush Haven’t Spoken
  3. Leak Blames Ousted Counsel Craig for Dawn Johnsen’s Stalled Confirmation
  4. “Department of Law”: Basic Civics Not Palin’s Strong Suit
  5. Washington Post: Rove More Involved in US Attorney Firings Than He Claims