Planless and mindless scraps from anywhere/ Bunch of used parts from garbage pails everywhere/ Frankenstein became a monster just like you/ Your scars only show when someone talks to you/ You’re so boring boring boring/ Always tape machine recording/ I’ve heard all this before I’ve heard all this before... Dead Kennedys, "Your Emotions"
OK, so the skateboarders don't have that much to do with the song, but it was the only good version I could find on youtube, and its the lyrics that matter. They perfectly express what is wrong with punditry today. From what passes for "left" to right to really really right batshit fucking insane, it's the same boring cast of boring people spewing the same predictably boring crap day after day, week after week. It has gotten to the point with these jokers that I don't even have to read more than a paragraph or two of their spittle-flecked diatribes and unctuous (there's that word again) rhetorical flourishes before I know exactly where their train of thought is leading. In addition, usually by the end of the first few sentences, there's at least one false premise, and often as not utter lies masquerading as fact (not surprising given the way Drudge-sourced rumors are treated as fact, as Glenn helpfully illustrates).
I happened to glance at Charles Krauthammer's column this past Tuesday. It's syndicated in the piss-poor remains of the Philadelphia Inquirer, now run by Republican hack Brian Tierney, the genius who wants to hire Rick Santorum as a columnist in a city that voted against Senator Dogfuck by a margin of 84%-16%. Here's what Chuckles had to say:
The charming part of this not-to-be-missed article (titled "Heart of Darkness," no less) is that it is framed as an exercise in compassion. Since she knows that the only way for her New Republic readers to understand Cheney is that he is evil - "next time you see Cheney behaving oddly, don't automatically assume that he's a bad man," she advises - surely the generous thing for a liberal to do is write him off as simply nuts. In the wonderland of liberalism, Cottle is trying to make the case for Cheney by offering him the insanity defense. She doesn't seem to understand that showing how circulatory problems can affect the brain proves nothing unless you first show the existence of a psychiatric disorder. Yet Cottle offers nothing in Cheney's presenting symptoms or behavior to justify a psychiatric diagnosis of any kind, let alone dementia.
See what I mean? You're probably rolling your eyes for a number of reasons, not the first of which is that this is a standard Krauthammer column: you know exactly what the rest is going to say. The column is as predictable and bland as the Family Circus, and not even half as clever. But it's more than that: it's as if Charles has forgotten his own record of diagnosing people he doesn't like. Howard Dean? Crazy. Gore? Crazy. Bush opponents? Collectively suffering from "Bush Derangement Syndrome."
Adding insult to injury, I took a look at Kathleen Parker's latest offering, glistening like a turd in the fresh-fallen snow. Before the heartless bitch lobbed an attack on John Edwards the day he announced his wife's cancer had returned (and as Jane pointed out, wasn't that just classy of the Chicago Tribune to run with it anyway? You can reach the Public Editor at 312-222-3348 to let him know what a tactful decision THAT was), she made a BIIIIG DEAL about Hillary's "fake southern accent". You know, the Drudge rumor that was debunked thoroughly Greg Sargent?
Until that moment, it was not known that anyone could sing that badly. To her credit, Hillary has since poked fun at herself, offering to step away from the microphone, for example, when a group was about to sing "Happy Birthday." No one can help the voice she's born with. But she can learn to adjust the volume and take the temperature of a room before speaking. And especially, to avoid faking a local accent, pretending to be something she's not. Southern, for instance. In Selma, Ala., at the recent "Bloody Sunday" commemoration, Hillary auditioned for a dual role - not just Southerner, but Southern preacher in the style of a Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. That dry rustling you hear is the sound of millions of people cringing.
Blah-de-blah-blah-blah. Honestly who gives a fuck? It's not like the current occupant is known for thesoothing tenor and melofluous timbre of his voice: quite the contrary. And the same laziness and attention to the frivolous is true for people like Joke Line, Peter Beinart, Tom Friedman, Richard Cohen, and the rest of the ninnies who claim to represent "liberals". And I'd gladly go and provide examples of their follies, but at this point I'M TOO FUCKING BORED TO BOTHER. Honestly, reading Sour-Kraut's drivel has me falling asleep at the keyboard, and reviewing the poopoo that Richard Cohen squeezes onto the pages of the Post is gonna put me over the edge.
To tell you the truth, none of these columnists are worth the money they're paid, not a single one. When was the last time Peter Beinart and Tom Friedman were right about anything? Not the war. Not Social Security (Peter). So who cares what these guys think? Moreover, and I address this to conservatives as well as lefties, when was the last time David Brooks or Richard Cohen provided food for thought to anyone? When was the last time anyone read one of their columns and thought "Gee, that's surprising! I never would have guessed that would have come out of HIM" or "Gee, I never looked at it that way before"? if you're looking for orignal thught, it sure as hell isn't gonna be found in the op-ed pages of the Times or the Post (Dan Froomkin, Paul Krugman, and Bob Herbert excepted). And yet they remain, like Greek statues that haven't lost their marble heads (it's the stuff inside, the brains, that's gone missing).
By contrast, I find something new and interesting in the blogosphere every day. Maybe it's the resident expert on the housing market at Daily Kos. Maybe it's some super-duper snark from TBogg or Jon Swift. Sometimes it's my brother getting off a good rant. And sometimes it has nothing to do with politics at all. We do it for free, we do it with more passion, and we bring the stories the muckety mucks don't think are so important to light of day.
Is it any wonder then that traditional journalism has had such a hard time dealing with blogs? Is it any wonder they call us dirty hippies, unserious, pajama clad, pick your pejorative?
And today, with the shameless publication of Kathleen Parker's diatribe about John Edwards fucking hair, his fucking hair for Chrissake we see who is truly bankrupt, creatively, intellectually, and morally. Boring. I'd rather sit around with my thumb up my ass watching paint dry. Barney the giant fucking purple fucking dinosaur is more interesting.
No, strike that. I'd rather read blogs.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
JUSTICE!
ROOTZ!
Elizabeth!
Parker’s column - a poor attempt at snark - better to leave that field to TRex.
PELOSI 2007
I’ve pretty much given up reading corporate owned media pundits for most of the reasons you’ve listed. To call them idiots is to insult idiots. The only exception is to allow me to occasionally call B*ll Sh*t on their pap. Otherwise, my blood pressure can’t take it anymore and I can’t afford the good buds to calm it down. :})
Posted as a comment on americablog today:
Whenever I asked Iraqis what kind of government they had wanted to replace Saddam’s regime, I got the same answer: they had never given it any thought. They just assumed that the Americans would bring the right people, and the country would blossom with freedom, prosperity, consumer goods, travel opportunities. In this, they mirrored the wishful thinking of American officials and neoconservative intellectuals who failed to plan for trouble. Almost no Iraqi claimed to have anticipated videos of beheadings, or Moqtada al-Sadr, or the terrifying question “Are you Sunni or Shia?”
Least of all did they imagine that America would make so many mistakes, and persist in those mistakes to the point that even fair-minded Iraqis wondered about ulterior motives. In retrospect, the blind faith that many Iraqis displayed in themselves and in America seems nave. But, now that Iraq’s demise is increasingly regarded as foreordained, it’s worth recalling the optimism among Iraqis four years ago.
www.newyorker.com
George Packer | 03.22.07 - 5:32 pm | #
Charles Krauthammer & Kathleen Parker would make a nice couple.
Posted as a comment on americablog earlier today:
Whenever I asked Iraqis what kind of government they had wanted to replace Saddam’s regime, I got the same answer: they had never given it any thought. They just assumed that the Americans would bring the right people, and the country would blossom with freedom, prosperity, consumer goods, travel opportunities. In this, they mirrored the wishful thinking of American officials and neoconservative intellectuals who failed to plan for trouble. Almost no Iraqi claimed to have anticipated videos of beheadings, or Moqtada al-Sadr, or the terrifying question “Are you Sunni or Shia?”
Least of all did they imagine that America would make so many mistakes, and persist in those mistakes to the point that even fair-minded Iraqis wondered about ulterior motives. In retrospect, the blind faith that many Iraqis displayed in themselves and in America seems nave. But, now that Iraq’s demise is increasingly regarded as foreordained, it’s worth recalling the optimism among Iraqis four years ago.
www.newyorker.com
George Packer | 03.22.07 - 5:32 pm | #
With me, and what I wanted to get into but unfortunately did not, was that oftentimes this shit ends up in the straight news.
like NPR regularly and consistently includes stuff I know isn’t true (because i read blogs) in what should be objective articles. it’s not all of the articles, but enought that my skin crawls.
Sorry for the double post–it didn’t seem to work the first time.
eCAHNomics @ 9
You know, I started reading “Imperial Life in the Emerald City” and I couldn’t get past the first chpater or two. i had to put it down, i got so angry…
Good stuff, Brendan,
Some of the best coverage of events outside of the USA is in the foreign press. It has been that way as long as I can remember. But, increasingly, MOST of the best published media coverage on the USA itself, is from the foreign press. Der Spiegel, although sometimes given to sensationalism, has been on top of the upcoming CIA trial in Italy.
Robert Lady, the former CIA chief in Milan, has gone into hiding. He is the subject of an extradition order from Italian authorities for the role he played in the kidnapping of radical Muslim cleric Abu Omar in Milan. Washington is seeking to derail the trial — perhaps because Condoleezza Rice may have given the operation the green light.
Ed*ard Teller @ 13
No one in this administration is going to be able to travel to Europe ever again. Old Europe’ll show them.
hey man…just got here.
Let me read the post (and watch the sweet sixteen) and then I’ll be back to say hey again
dakine01 @ 6
Agreed. I go to CrooksandLiars for my MSM clips, except for KO. I will admit to watching Matthews, but I turn down the volume until the Leheys come on.
Has it been repeated today?
DICK CHENEY CONTROLS TIM RUSSERT
I find Mr. Krauthammer’s analysis of anything, as being rather simple minded and so polarizing and partisan. George Will runs a very close second. Though Mr. Will seems to know his thesaurus pretty well. Though this does not impress. These guys are not nuts, and neither is Cheney. I find no redeeming qualities in Krauthammer. But I will say this for Will, he appears to be somewhat aquainted with baseball stats. What this qualifies Mr. Will for, I am at a loss. And these talking ‘brains’ get paid for this stuff. I’m not even going to get into Parker. Much less Debra Saunders of the SF Chron.
Krauthammer (and Broder, and Cohen) should be carted off to wherever Sally Quinn is soiling her Depends.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 18
Aren’t these all just wingnut entertainers like Ann coulter, but with slightly more civilized tongues? Almost nothing they say/write passes as information or analysis.
Ed*ard Teller @ 13
I’ll have to check out that link.
I listen to NPR’s Morning Edition when i drink my coffee, BBC on the drive in, and then ATC on the way home. The difference is pretty remarkable.
But to get back to the punditry for a sec, what offends me more is that these writers just suck. It would be one thing to be a bad writer, but factually accurate (or inaccurate but interesting), and I don’t read anything like that. It’s just phoned in, so fucking boring. I say fire the lot and hire a whole new stable of writers.
wrt pat buchanan on scarborough…………….
I’m not sure how many floors of just totally batsh*t insane there actually are, but it was obvious tonite buchanan is at least at basement #6 or 7. Have lost track of the number of times MSNBC has had him on since the USA story broke, but if he’s the *best* rebuttal the thugs can come up with………..we’re in real good shape. ;-)
Oklahoma kiddo @ 18
My father hates George Will. Fucking loathes him for the whole pseudo-intellectualism. then he turns into Frank Costanza, “it gives real intellectuals a bad name!!”
Brendan @ 10
I know what you mean. I live in a rural area, and can only get one station on the radio while I do my metamorphosis in the morning. I know more than the clear channel reporter out of L.A.
Could you use the Imhofe scale for pundits too? From thingprogress:
The Inhofe scale. WSJ notes a new scale, created by blogger Lou Grinzo, that measures how delusional or detached from reality a person is. A 100 on the Inhofe Scale, Grinzo says, is commensurate with the sort of willful delusion he says is contained in Inhofe’s “greatest hoax” speech. “Just to be clear, this is a measurement of detachment from widely accepted reality, not a measure of how much the speaker disagrees with me,” Grinzo writes.
I am a huge fan of those who can distill a complex idea into simple, everyday language.
Waccamaw @
22
Buchanan has pretty much always been bat sh*t crazy. He goes back to Nixon and has worked for and been an apologist for most all the Republics except for the BushCo crowd and even then will defend them against Dems
And I just have to imagine, “what must it be like to be at a cocktail party with these miserable fucking douchebags?” Krauthammer always looks like he’s been sucking lemons. Cohen looks exactly the way he writes (scroll for images), if Fred Hiatt’s editorials are any indication, he’s the guy who traps you in a corner and pontificates until you want to commit suicide.
ugh.
eCAHNomics @ 25
that’s awesome. i’m gonna start using that.
Brendan @ 28
I agree with you about Krauthammer looking like he’s sucking lemons and used to wonder about that until I read that he’s a paraplegic, which at least gives him an excuse of sorts.
Brendan @
21
Never thought I would miss William Safire. I don’t, but he could certainly write. Back in my Republican days - long ago - I enjoyed National Review more for the quality of writing than for the polemics. Same with Commentary Magazine. Now, even those places’ writers suck bigtime.
Good commentary - New York Review of Books and New Yorker. My favorite political writer over the past 25 years - Elizabeth Drew.
dakine01 @ 30
Really?
Brendan @ 29
If you assign a time scale to how long someone has retained a position on the Imhofe scale, you might say something like: “He’s been a 99 on the Imhofe scale for 10 Friedmans.
dakine01 @ 27
Oh, I knew that, darlin’. He’s always been totally foul but, if you didn’t catch him tonite, he has apparently gone so far beyond the bend that you can’t see him from here. ;-)
Being an ol’ country boy from the bluegrass, I used to wait by the mailbox during the ‘72 campaign for the new issue of Rolling Stone just to read Hunter Thompson’s latest diatribe. Now THERE was a political writer!!!
Yeah, dishonest and corrupt, but a great writer. i enjoyed his language column.
I can’t believe I’m saying that.
AAAGGGHHHHH
What this qualifies Mr. Will for, I am at a loss.
Joining a rotisserie league, maybe? Sitting in the bleachers at his favorite ball park with the rest of us?
Given the blasts from Will’s past linked to in this sourcewatch article, you might not want to grant him even that much. I’d forgotten till recently just how slimey he’s been willing to be.
dakine01 @ 35
and funny, original, interesting to read.
You know who else I miss? Mike Royko. I used to read his stuff when I was a teenager, and I always enjoyed the writing.
maybe he was a shill too, i don’t know: all i know is he wrote well.
Patrick Fitzgerald on the US Attorneys etc.:
Bwaaaaahahahahaha! May the jails fill with Bushies.
-
Gonzales PR Strategy: I’m Going To Stay Focused On Our Kids
He couldn’t take care of his own sister yet we have .. “I’m Going To Stay Focused On Our Kids” yeah ok…
Alberto Gonzales’ sudden moment in the unflattering spotlight has prompted a new look at his background.
Gonzales’ younger sister Theresa plead guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Nine years later, while Gonzales was on the Texas Supreme Court, his mother and another brother signed over their houses to a bail bondsman to raise bail for Theresa after she was charged with the same offense.
http://www.buffalonews.com/180/story/34944.html
Brendan @ 36
Never forget: it can always get worse.
The two people most opposite of Inhofe are, for me, Gore and Edwards. Gore/Edwards for ‘08. I support this ticket. 100%
Waccamaw, I saw the beginning of it when he was gracious about Ms Edwards but then when he started his poor, poor, Judi Miller schtick, I went to the kitchen and made my dinner. By the time I got back, he was gone.
lolo, I believe it was something on Eric Alterman’s Altercation a few months ago but then saw something somewhere else a couple of days later as well.
omg been gone all day! too much to read!
great minds rant alike
I just added a post to my occaisional blog at Lutton Square–a post inspired by a conversation over at TPM’s Horses Mouth blog. Alterman had used a Joe Klein quote from 2000 in a column today, and Klein responded by saying
But to really enjoy the richness of Klein’s ‘wisdom,’ you need to see more of his comments from 2000:
Holy crap, could he have been more wrong? He had it exactly ass-backwards. From the Square:
Perhaps it was a reaction to the centrist ‘wisdom,’ but Bush, Cheney, et al did not seek to work from the center out (even if they preached such conciliatory words, they did not practice it). Instead they pushed as hard as they could, as quickly as they could.
Meanwhile, with little more than rhetoric to work, Democrats had little choice but to sound and act less than conciliatory, earning the disparaging remarks in the media and accusatory glances on the cocktail circuit from the ‘wise old men of Washington.’
Brendan @ 38
I enjoyed Royko as well. I lived in Waltham, MA for a few years, and it was fairly obvious to me that both Mike Barnicle and Howie Carr were trying to be the Boston answer for Royko. And there have been plenty of other wannabes around the country as well. Now if they just had Royko’s talent for outrage AND writing but most just do the faux outrage bit.
Oklahoma kiddo @
18
He could write baseball nostalgia books with Bob Costas?
lutton @ 45
Oh yeah I saw that! Fucking hilarious. He’s like a freakin’ ten year old. Sargent makes a great point: Klein’s a pundit because someone decided his words matter: “Why is this “pathetic”? Why does Klein tend to react so violently when people quote his past work? I mean, if you’re a pundit, you should want people to think your opinions are important enough to engage.”
dakine01 @ 35
You must be the classic Dirty Old Hippie. Me too.
Some blogger named Al gives a shout out to Ms Boxer.
Barnicle. That name suits the guy doesn’t it? he IS a fuckin’ barnacle.
He spoke at my college commencement a couple of years before the George Carlin incident.
Ed*ard Teller @ 31
That’s what the DC circuit did to the profession over the last few decades. They didn’t really care much for how you said it, as long as it was on message. The message paid the bills.
At least now we have a mechanism for cheap and wide publication and distribution.
well hello Brendan -
was just doing some looking around Left Blogistan, trying to see if there was a Specter Watch blog somewhere - so far, it’s only the disappointed wingnuts - and apparently I shouldn’t bother with The Inquirer -
any of the Philly/PA bloggers devoting some quality time to the Senator ?
Brendan @
38
I grew up in Chi, where Royko was the first political columnist I read on a regular basis. I don’t think he ever became a shill, though I lost regular touch when I left town a decade or more before he died. He was a real maverick against the first Mayor Daley, which took genuine courage back in those days of Moscow on the Lake and Red squads in the CPD. His biography of Daley, Boss, is still considered a useful work, and believe me, is no hagiography.
(Hmm. Looks like my Final Four is going to take has taken its first hit … argh. Darn Tigers!)
Scarborough was ripping Rosie O’Donnell apart tonite because she said that the governemnt was in on the plot to take down WTC-7 to get rid of investigation materials, like Enron.
Joe said that someone needs to give Baba Wawa an intervention for having Rosie on her show.
Oklahoma kiddo @
18
Debra fuckin Saunders! She drives me crazy. Thursday is conservative day on the SF Chronicle Op-Ed page and we are often blessed (like today) with Debra on one side of the page and Victor Davis Hanson on the other. What drives me crazy about Debra is that she sets up a story and goes along, goes along sort of making sense, but inevitable drives off the road in the last couple of paragraphs. It’s like her brain hits an IED or something.
And Hanson is a real piece o’ work. He is at the Hoover Institute at Stanford and is allegedly an historian. But I keep thinking he grew up on some parallel universe planet from the one I live in.
I only read them if I am running a quart low on adrenaline…which hasn’t happened lately for obvious reasons.
mrJJ @ 40
If that article is factual, you gotta ask, “Who was doing the research on this guy prior to confirmation”? Thanks for the linky, mrJJ.
Got here late, I miss my Molly
I’ll never forgive Royko for dissing San Diego and my Padres in 1984. (Pads won that series - heh)
Krauthammer. Nutjob.
Cheney. Fascist nutjob.
Will. Arrogant, dishonest, nutjob.
cbl @ 53
My blog, Brendan Calling does a lot of Specter stuff, as does Suburban Guerilla and atrios.
I do not know of a Specter-specific blog, but it would be a great resource.
One really good blog for Philadelphia (and PA) politics is Hall Watch.
Interstingly, the google search i just did turned up mostly right-wing sources. They eat their own…
Whenever I start to think Buchana makes sense I remember that he referred to the UN Secretary General as Boo-Boo Ghali and for a period of time in the 80’s took up the mantle of defending a man who turned out to be a notorious death camp guard for the Nazis.
Pat is back in form where he believes if the president does it it isn’t wrong.
-GSD
As for Tweety giving out rub and tugs to the likes of Delay.
Terry Olson: I’m a couple of years too young to be a classic dirty ol’ hippie. I graduated from a military HS in ‘70. But I was a McGovern delegate in ‘72 while a Soc major with ROTC minor! There were me and a black guy who were considered the “radicals” of the ROTC dept. I wound up flunking out to avoid the commission and eventually enlisted in the USAF, where I finished the degree while stationed in Hawaii. I pretty much manipulated the system to my advantage and avoided getting my a** shot off as my draft number was 6. And I finished the degree and also won awards as “outstanding airman” while enjoying fine Hawaii buds for four years. But it’s been a hell of a ride so far.
jeffreyw @ 50
Good one Jeffreyw. I love Al Gore and hope to see him in his rightful house real soon. Can yu imagine winning the presidential election and not being crowned? He must have been talking to himself fr the last couple of years….
also, re: Specter Watch, try Philly Future, which links to all Philly blogs.
Something oughta turn up…
Brendan:
I’d say you do a good job of covering Specter, with all your calls to his office.
Getting sleepy and about to hit the hay, but I saw the name Charles Krauthammer. (Whose column, alas, is carried in the Savannah Daily Disappointment.) I wish I could remember where I saw it, possibly on World O’ Crap, but someone called him Charles Cabbagemallet. I still snort every time I see his name. Now I don’t even have to read his column before I snort. This is a GOOD thing!
Wil @
58
I know. Me, too. The Funny Times has a great tribute to her in the April issue. I probably won’t be able to read it without weeping. What I always loved about Molly was that I would be ranting and sputtering and open her column to see that she expressed ever so eloquently exactly what was swirling around in my head. And with a smile. One of my favorite Molly expressions—and very useful these days: whomperjawed!
I always like to pretened I’m colonole klink when I say it:
KRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAUTHAMMER!!!!
Nite, Marion -
See you at breakfast!
oh. my. god.
Brendan @
68
Oh, I can hear Klink saying it! Cabbagemallet doesn’t have that auditory yumminess happening, alas… Thanks for the audiovisual of Col. Klink!
thanks for all the info Brendan, spritzing on the Spectercide and headed over now
rxbusa @ 67
I live by - you gotta dance…
the political statement is apt, but I just need to dance
Nighty night, Waccamaw… You sleep safe and well too.
Webb on C-Span 2.
Drive by, Brendan! Round here, nothing but pundit cake. rock on.
Is this what they mean by busting the margins?
no seriously you have to watch this.
Atlas meltdown!
well I was headed over there and when I went to click on Brendan’s name @ 7:04 - I foolishly clicked on that link -
boyz and girlz, this is a sickness and Pammy is a gateway drug - sure keep it up! go right down that road and soon enough you’ll find yourself up in the night surfing for radical mormom housewives posts - this is the voice of experience here, this is a path you don’t have to take :)
Brendan @
70
Why did you do that to us? AAARRRRGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!! That “person” is an IDIOT.
As a lifelong demo, I will give her Teddy Roosevelt and even Dwight David Eisenhower as Republicans that were not hated by dems. But all the Republics she named are lying scum sucking cockroaches. Jeebus!
I heart Sadly No.
Brendan @ 78
I just realized that Atlas reminds me of the drunken or drugged-out clips of Paula Abdul that they have been showing.
Except that Atlas is much worse in every way.
I loe the Dead Kennedy’s
dakine01 @ 80
Because the meltdown is HILARIOUS.
the babbling about “destroying effective republicans”, elian gonzalez “the poor little bastard from cuba”…
Brendan @ 84
I thought it was sarcasm
dakine01 @ 62
Are you still in the military now? Boy, can I relate to that draft number. 6. I watched along with my brothers and boyfriend as those numbers came up. My brothers didn’t register, but my boyfriend did. It was scary times, those days. We all watched as they pulled the numbers (birthdates)out of the canister much as they do in Las Vegas or for lotteries.
I enjoyed the buds too.
Congratulations and mutual respect for supporting McGovern, and for being an Airman in our military. May the democrats get to the bottom of the current rape on America.
You rock. Excuse me, rawk.
Waccamaw @
57
But it does fit in with the thug pattern of appointing vulnerable people to sensitive positions, because they’re then easier to manipulate.
Someone on an earlier thread today suggested that they’ve been strategically appointing minorities and women, thinking that would make it harder for Democrats to criticize them. I agree with that, and would add that unless the those appointees are unassailably top-notch in their careers, not just in the brand-name schools they might have attended, that they are set up to be vulnerable on account of that same minority status as well, in a wink-nudge sense. Gonzales owes everything he has since finishing law school to patronage, which makes him just the tool his patrons want—the more so if he has a troublesome relative.
folks, i gotta go get some dinner.
trex is coming up with something good!
see you next thursday…
Terry Olson @
86
No, I got my dd214 in ‘82 after 5 years 9 months. I had spent 15 months in Northern MI at a SAC base and was rewarded by the four years in the Islands. First termers can only go six years without re-enlisting. When they asked me to re-up, I just looked at the guy. And he shook his head, and understood. I’d finished my degree after 4 years at the best base in the air force and he wanted me to re-enlist? It would ALL have been downhill from there. I wound up working for the war machine with various companies until we agreed to disagree. Unfortunately, I’ve been reaping the “benefits” of the Chimpy’s “wonderful” economy by being unemployed for three years now. And panic is setting in as the funds are about gone. But that’s a whole other story.
prostratedragon -
True, that.
when was the last time David Brooks or Richard Cohen provided food for thought to anyone?
Bobo Brooks really made this “rabid lamb” think when he offered this linguistic vomit saying “poor” people sure are gonna be sorry if Rick Santorum loses the election. You see, because ManOnDog was a great champion of “poor people around the world.”
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/2333
I thought, “What a dishonest twit! His mere presence on PBS News Hour and in the NYT seriously calls into question those organization’s motives.” So I guess he can be thought-provoking at least.
Wil @ 83
Wil, how’d your interview go? Did you like them?
HotFlash @ 92
Went well, thanks. I hate having to go back to the for profit world, but I hope it pays the bills. The whole accountant thing makes me queasy, but, I’m good at it. C’est la vie
neurophius @ 82
OK, so I watched it. Now, is there any way to get that 4 minutes of my life back?