This takes some serious stones:
Federal prosecutors took the first steps toward reducing the prison sentence of former Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff, currently scheduled for release in 2011 for a Florida fraud conviction.
Documents filed in federal court say Abramoff has provided ``substantial assistance'' in a separate Washington corruption scandal investigation and continues to work with investigators from his prison cell in Cumberland, Md.
Especially in light of this (which I'm frankly surprised hasn't gotten more coverage today):
The leader of the Justice Department team that prosecuted a landmark lawsuit against tobacco companies said yesterday that Bush administration political appointees repeatedly ordered her to take steps that weakened the government's racketeering case.
Sharon Y. Eubanks said Bush loyalists in Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales's office began micromanaging the team's strategy in the final weeks of the 2005 trial, to the detriment of the government's claim that the industry had conspired to lie to U.S. smokers.
She said a supervisor demanded that she and her trial team drop recommendations that tobacco executives be removed from their corporate positions as a possible penalty. He and two others instructed her to tell key witnesses to change their testimony. And they ordered Eubanks to read verbatim a closing argument they had rewritten for her, she said.
"The political people were pushing the buttons and ordering us to say what we said," Eubanks said. "And because of that, we failed to zealously represent the interests of the American public."
Eubanks, who served for 22 years as a lawyer at Justice, said three political appointees were responsible for the last-minute shifts in the government's tobacco case in June 2005: then-Associate Attorney General Robert D. McCallum, then-Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler and Keisler's deputy at the time, Dan Meron.
McCallum...McCalum...where have we heard that name before? Ah yes, he was the one that BushCo. was trying to jam into a supervisory position over Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation. James Comey short-circuited the effort by transferring his powers to David Margolis before he left the Justice Department. Thank. Jeebus.
I remember my eyeballs just about rolled back in my head when I saw Alice Fisher had received a recess appointment to head the criminal division at the Justice Department (during Hurricane Katrina no less, after serious Senatorial objection...when nobody was looking) and was giving the presser about the Abramoff case...despite her reported connections to Tom DeLay. It touched off a mini blog firestorm and with good reason. Fisher should have recused herself from the Abramoff investigation a long time ago, but as we are learning, that is not how things work in Bushville.
As Christy asked this morning, if Casino Jack has been so very damn helpful, where are all the indictments? Enquiring minds want to know.
They are burying the bodies fast.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
I hope those senate and house investigations crank up quick, there may be nothing left of the Republic otherwise.
Sounds to me like the DoJ is cooperating with Abramoff, not the other way around.
mediocre FITZ!
Wow Jane.
Ok, I’m spotlighting.
No way, they would do this unless Jack is holding back.
My vote for quote of the day:
You can read the whole post on the prior thread.
Fitz!
Jane!!
Want to see a revolution? Let Abroamoff early for good behavior.
I’ve been trying to find out if Alice has made ANY progress on the mounds of reams of material brought out of the offices of Alaska’s Republican legislators’ offices about eight months ago - and am getting nowhere. I remember Jane introducing us to Ms. Fisher when she was promoted. I commented yesterday that she probably fits the bill of what Karl Gonzales wants better than any other DOJ apparatchik.
No doubt Conyers has staffers keeping track of this stuff and is preparing a long list of questions for the White House staffers. Those people will be providing answers to those questions for the next few years.
That’s my question, too. All that cooperation and hardly anything to show for it. We’re being screwed people.
As an archaeologist, i would like to point out that I am highly skilled with a shovel.
Why oh why am I not surprised?
Anything to block the inevitable sunshine.
Do they really think this shit is just going to go away?There is way too much out there already for that to happen.
I’d like to see Abroamoff working in a sweatshop in the Marinanas for ten to twenty years
I think I recall reading an article about how the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department was gutted under Bush - lot’s of career professionals with years of experience where either shoved out or made so uncomfortable that they quit.
Does anyone else remember reading about this?
At this point, I think the Democrats should be picking things that will lead to indictments, rather than run of the mill nastiness. Things like the FISA warrents, torture, etc. should be taking precedence over slipshod prosecutions.
Abramoff is emblematic of what’s wrong with the dirty Bush administration. Whither goes Ralph Reed?
Paraquay is going to be terribly crowded in a very short time!
Ed*ard Teller @ 9
She’s probably made lots of progress shredding all the evidence and covering the tracks of the crooks in office.
I guess Gonzo just wants to spend the rest of his time sitting in front of the judiciary committees of Congress.
Language is a problem in describing the issue with the USAs: two talking heads, one of whom will say it’s “political” (as in political appointee) meaning it’s OK while the other will say it’s “political” (as in political interference in judicial procedures) meaning it’s bad.
Let the apologists keep their good “political”. We need another word or phrase to describe the badness of this. A widespread pattern of obstruction of justice. To me, that sounds good but is it perhaps too strong –at this point in time–for someone like Tweety? Any suggestions?
Looks exactly like you have a coup de e’tat on your hands courtesy of your local fascist Republican supporters and their weak willied Democratic enablers. A real cancer in the body politic. no?
could it be the WH and various theives and scoundrels see the writeing on the wall,and are in high ass-cover mode….the ship of state here i.e. this administration may have figured out its taken one below the waterline…and its a matter of time…
What is wrong with these people? Republicans used to be the party of stodgy old skinflints who didn’t like tomfoolery and shenanigans. Now they’re like the tertiary-syphillis crazy-time party. The madness!
There’s so much stuff, the Democrats need a plan. Is that even possible for them? At times, organizing them seems like hearding cats. I’d hate to think that the Republicans slip out of all of this.
I have to take another 35 minute walk or I’m not allowed to watch basketball tonight.
(don’t ask)
Back soon…
I always thought that providing “substantial assistance” meant sitting up in the witness box and saying “that’s the guy I worked with (or for).” Until Jack raises his right hand and swears to tell the truth, I’m not buying claims of assistance.
Supposedly, all the evidence seized in the raids remains in Alaska, in storage units controlled by the FBI in Juneau and Anchorage. They’ve only taken copies back to the 36-person “corruption” unit Fisher so aptly supervises. Supposedly.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 16
Reed seems to have modeled himself after Bush: Christian in name only.
This Ben Sargent cartoon is Great!
My courtroom experience is limited, but I have a feeling that reading a closing argument to a jury is not a very effective strategy.
Seems to me that the Administration ought to be happy with the current state of affairs. Given everything we know about their stifling of other investigations, is it possible to imagine any outcome other than a big stall related to the prosecutions that Carol Lam was pursuing.
Our representatives have been, are, and will prepare for hearings. What we citizens need to do, it seems to me, is figure out how to increase the political cost to the Republicans of refusing to answer Congressional subpoenas.
neurophius @ 30
And reading someone else’s closing argument to them is even less effective.
Especially if that someone else wants you to lose.
Those Bushies just won’t stop will they? Bad to the bone. And I hope, hope, hope we don’t let them get away with it. Just as I form the word “unbelievable” there’s something else that is even more so. What will tomorrow bring?
cleter @
23
Dang! I’m using that one with my old man.
lets see, Abramoff and pals rip off Native Americans.
bushco interferes with a case in favor of Big Tobacco that made their money on the backs of slaves and many, many, many more.
Our history will continue to haunt us until the American people face facts and boot these ghouls and criminals away from the White House and Capitol Hill forever.
OK - I hit my wall!
Rather than bang my head against it, I’m going to follow Kobie’s advice (he’s telepathic) and take a walk. Later, gang. Good for Jane - four kickass posts in a row!
let the jack off jokes begin.
cleter @ 12
But can you whack someone in the head with one as well? We need that talent also.
uncle toby @ 20
Isn’t the language obstruction of justice?
Jane Hamsher @ 25
Jane the Lakers play Memphis at 8EDT. If you miss the beginning you won’t miss much. How many will Koby score tonght? 50? 65? Any thoughts of entertaining the idea of switching allegiances? How does this sound, FireDogCelts? No? I don’t blame you. They’re in a race to the bottom. Remember the good old days with Magic and Bird? I do. Well, enough of living in the past. Later.
Mauimom @ 39
Sure. Is this off the record? I’m not under oath, am I?
cleter @ 42
Oh, I’m sorry, did you say something?
Ed*ard Teller @ 37
I noticed that too. That’s why I cracked this open. Jane!
Rayne, are you wearing a wire?
I wonder if Christy or Marcy could answer this… Is there some federal appointee at DOJ who’s enabling Abramoff? Is there any way to find out who’s supervising these interrogations? Who’s dealing with pleas?
Who is this Republican tool who is squirming like a stuck toad to avoid Tweety’s question about Bush’s authority to go to war?
Imagine if Eubanks would have used her own closing argument, the one she wanted to use. Bet she now wishes she had. I wish she had.
Matthews ripping Idiot Canter a new asshole for not being specific about whether Bush needed congressional authorization to go to war with Iraq.
Tweety mad!
Sharon Eubanks was on Day to Day this morning and didn’t sound very pleased with her superiors
Click
OldCoastie @ 49
He ripped him a new one the last time he was on also, for saying it’s the job of the military to make policy! Huh? LOL
You think the morons in the DOJ would have the good sense to delay the ABRAMOFF GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD until after the US Attorney obstruction of Justice scandal died down
… or is it a bright shiny object that’s worth trying… an exercise of prosecutorial discration and power.
Pay no attention to these ramblings, I need a nap.
john in sacramento @ 51
I heard that interview and thought: “this is on NPR?” Something’s happening.
Waxman’s letter to Gonzales over the Eubanks/Tobacca issue, sent today, March 22nd.
Waxman to Gonzales letter
What Henry wants:
To assist the Committee’s inquiry into whether there was political interference in the
tobacco litigation, please provide the Committee with the following documents for the time
frame from January 20,2001, to the present:
(1) All communications between the White House and the Department of Justice related
to the Department’s suit against the tobacco industry, U.S. v. Philip Morris;
(2) All notes, in any form, kept by political appointees at the Department related to White
House involvement in the tobacco litigation;
(3) An accounting of all contacts between the White House and the Department of Justice
related to the tobacco litigation; and
(a) The full report completed by the Office of Professional Responsibility related to its
investigation into possible political interference in the tobacco litigation.
Please provide the documents requested by the Committee by Apnl7,2007 .
Neil @
41
I think Jane must be talking NCAA not NBA–so if it is LA it is UCLA.
But as to the serious-stones item, how is it possible that this pattern of maniputlation and firing of prosecutors in the middle of investigations is not obstruction of justice. there is some real potential criminal activity going on here if folks are pulling the plug on investigations of contributors and the politically connected. I mean look at the IMHOFE contribution list: hundreds of thousands from oil and gas lobby.
cleter @ 23
You all are too funny today, I swear.
I grab my stomach which hurts from laughing, and in doing so I strain my hurt rotator cuff, which makes me laugh because of the falling-apartness of it all, and it just goes on and on!
angie @ 36
You can say that again.
Jane thanks for keeping your nose directed towards the Bushshit! Shovels will not be enough we need a tractor with a front end loader. More like a fleet of tractors to haul away the Bushshit!
The Democrats need to be making the meta point that the Bushies tried their best to turn the Department of Justice (Justice!)into a sleazy political machine, with Karl Rove calling the shots. The Tobacco case and the suggestion of letting Abramoff off easy reinforce the impression that the USA firings created. The goopers can whine all they want about “Clinton did it, TOOOOOOOOOOO!” but I doubt that they can come up with anything approaching the evidence we are facing about the Bush administration.
Send more LOVE to Henry Waxman!!!
It wouldn’t surprise me if it is the testimony of disgruntled underlings that finally brings this presidency down.
Boy, turn on the lights and the cockroaches start to scatter.
And Jane, I hope you’re talking NCAA & UCLA hoops - I fear the Lakers would sap your spirit. Even if Kobe’s namesake pops for 50 again….
Sally @ 48
Oh, I think she could still get some use for it.
For instance, if I were a reporter or an editor, I’d just LOVE to put her original side by side with the one she was given.
Another possible audience for it would be Senator Leahy and Rep Conyers. They, too, would enjoy putting both of these drafts side by side, along with any emails or notes she might have of the back and forth with the higher ups at the DOJ.
Some the Eubank’s e-mails:
Link
OT, but maybe not…..
“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers…. The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.”
Aldous Huxley Brave New World foreword to 1946 edition
Cozumel @ 52
Sorry I missed Matthews ripping. He has been hammering hard ever since he realized that he had been lied to along with the mass of Americans who relied on the mainstream media before the “illegal” invasion of Iraq. Matthews should have been on the blogs and listening to the Diane Rehms show and BBc before the invasion. Diane had expert after expert on before the invasion telling the public the intellingence was a bunch of hogwash.
Here’s another one….
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
Hi, AZ Matt -
Glad to cross threads w/you, my cartoon-lovin’ buddy. Question:
Do you by any chance have a linky to Sack (other than this one: http://www.startribune.com/sack)? I run across him occasionally on compilation sites but the startrib button for printing on a Mac doesn’t work for me. Would enjoy more frequent access w/print capability.
Thank you to punaise and anyone else who reposted the link to the virtual candle for Elizabeth Edwards during the day. I haven’t read all the threads yet, and don’t know if I’ll get a chance tonight, because it looks like we’ve got a fresh round of IEP hell to deal with. But I did take a few minutes to post a graphic link to the candle here.
Sally @ 48
Tool. Stenographer. Thanks so much.
Was that Eric Cantor (R-VA) that Tweety tore into? If so, lovely!
here’s some news:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03.....mp;emc=rss
Waccamaw @ 68
Sorry I don’t.
Thanks, jackie, for this powerful quote. If you had a linky, that would be super.
jackie @ 67
jackie @ 67 - link please
angie @ 71
Well, from his actions as budget director, Stockman certainly has a lot of expertise in using numbers deceptively…
Yep, that was him. I wonder how people that stoopid get elected!?
Digby connects more dots
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com.....nthal.html
Cozumel @ 76
he sure knows how to just keep smiling while the new asshole is being created.
and jane-posted earlier but don’t know if you saw it–
sampson-
ex-chief of staff for gonzales already has a new home
doj, legislative section in environmental division
heard it on the radio 3-16, last friday.
Frankly, I’m surprised, too, that the tobacoo settlement didn’t get more attention today.
But this is BIG.
Cozumel @ 76
dim bulb in the running: Lynn Westmoreland from GA, the guy who was leering at Valerie Wilson the other day (so I’ve heard). He’s the one who wants the ten commandments posted everywhere but couldn’t recite but a few of them when interviewed by Colbert.
Waccamaw @ 68
Try Cagle Cartoons
All I have to do is look at her face to see she deceitful. Why is it so hard for others?
AZ Matt -
Thanks. Hope we see each other on some less serious thread & get a chance to compare favorites.
Ed*ard Teller @ 9
wild shot in the dark: read somewhere on line about a ’slip of the finger’ on a ‘delete’ button that wiped out 38 million $ worth of info in Alaska? any connection?
as I say, wild speculation.
uncle toby @ 20
Let the apologists keep their good “political”. We need another word or phrase to describe the badness of this. A widespread pattern of obstruction of justice. To me, that sounds good but is it perhaps too strong –at this point in time–for someone like Tweety? Any suggestions?
how about unethical?
What might happen to Jack (hopefully not):
Premature Emancipation
cleter @
45
Umm, uh…yeah, two of ‘em…but they don’t count.
You were saying?
So now we don’t have to wonder about the Federal Prosecuters who didn’t lose their jobs and went along with Carl Roves demands.
tobacco award reduction, jack abramoff conviction reduction.
I just wonder if shrubs cabal is going for all they can to overwhelm those investigating them.
I’m trying to find the links . I got these a while ago, but now they seem to be gone…..
Eureka Springs, AR says
March 22nd, 2007 at 3:08 pm
jackie @ 67 - link please
ESaund @
15
From the website of the House Judiciary
Committee:
It looks to me as if this hearing might be somewhat separate from the hearings on the fired US Attorneys, though it goes to the same point about corrupt politicization. I heard a bit of the testimony at this hearing, from Wayne Henderson, on the radio. I also read at least one article on the subject a while back, from WPost, “Civil Rights Focus Shift Roils Staff At Justice”, in 2005.
john in sacramento -
Good on! Printing as we speak. Thanks for enabling my addiction ;-)
OT: who the fuck is Ruben Navarrette?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/.....index.html
This is just bullshit. This idiot is making the case that Dems hate Gonzalez because he’s Hispanic. Sweet buttery Jesus…
Mabel’s Wig Shack @
85
It was for the state oil fund that pays out millions each year to AK residents. The original and back-up drives both got hosed and the tape back-ups were unreadable. They had to pretty much recreate all their data from jump street. They had all the original hard copy paper and hired temps (and a lot of OT) to re-scan all the info.
from jane above
sharon eubanks was on npr today, said her piece…..think it was on ‘day to day’ but not sure…….
I sincerely hope that the majorities in both houses are a tad bit OCD. There are so many things they need to organize and clean. The criminals have had so many years without oversight, and marry that with their overwhelming arrogance and hypocrisy and you have an expansive closet full of deceit, destruction and pure, unadulteraed crime. All the committees in both houses needs to get their acts together. The graft and corruption has permeated every crevice of our government and society. I want my beloved country back!!!!
Tom @ 93
I read that and I thought, Wow, a new Hispanic shill? Yeah. I think the Hispanic community thinks Gonzo is to them what Condi is to African-Americans.
Oh, and Elaine Chao, too.
Pretty puppets.
I consider it a testament to my abiding faith in humanity that I continue to register surprise at what slimeballs these people are.
My grammar sucked on this post because I AM PISSED OFF!!! Sorry
Tom @ 93
I don’t know anything about the guy, but he does make an interesting admission…
“Gonzales’ persecutors are blind with rage, or maybe just blind. Surely they see that the push to dump the U.S. attorneys came from White House political adviser Karl Rove.“
This leads me to believe he is coming from a Hispanic rather than a Republican perspective.
Rayne @ 97
Navarette is an old shill - a real uncle Tomas. Perfect opportunity (and opportunist) for the Wurlizter.
I’m trying to rememeber where I used to read him (LA Times), but it’s like trying to remember which square of sidewalk had the dogshit I avoided stepping in.
OT: It’s been interesting to watch the excellent Josh Marshall inch closer to DFHippiedom. He does’t use teh sweats, but (emphasis added):
Caught himself there at the end with that update. But I like that he does what he does, just as I like that we do what we do. Not the same thing.
His site is journalism, 2.0, occasionally committing activism (example: Social Security). We’re activism, 2.0, and occasionally we commit reporting (example: Plame/Libby stuff).
Eureka Springs, AR @
74
www.amerikanexpose.com/quotes1.html
sorry couldn’t link it..( this wasn’t where I got it originally. I did a search)
Another likely dropped ball by the new improved just ice department: remember back in ‘99 and ‘00 the antitrust case against microsoft? MS had lied and claimed that Internet Exploiter was an integral and inseparable part of Windoze 9x, and was squeezing out competing browsers, like Netscape.
Somehow, the case just faded away around the time the Bush and Dick show opened.
I’ve read that the DoJ put the kibosh on the investigation of Abramoff in Guam among other investigations.
and for you comic lovers
i like comics.com
Pach @ 102 - well stated, I agree.
I love me a good Waxman slapdown on the Prez like yesterday’s letter to Conyers and Leahy:
Dear Chairman Leahy and Chairman Conyers:
Yesterday President Bush asserted that the White House would give Congress
‘bnprecedented” access to information regarding the Administration’s recent dismissal of U.S.
Attorneys. This staternent is misinformed. As you continue discussions with the White House
regarding your investigation of the U.S. Attorneys matter, I wanted to bring to your attention
relevant precedent.
LINK
Jim Hudson @ 105
from epluribusmedia.
WAXMAN!! Thanks AZMatt. For the cartoon as well.
Navarette is, if you scroll down to the bottom of that, a columnist from San Diego. He’s conservative on some things, and IMO he’s a bit too sensitive about prejudice, although he’s undoubtedly met it far too often. (Even in CA, there are people who think that brown means illegal, and the closer you get to the border, the worse it is.)
P