
AFP/Getty Images/Mark Wilson
"Does this rug make me look incompetent?"
for the week ending 3/17/07:
Title credit: Ken Burns presents "The Uncivil War". Cue music.
"To his Excellency George W. Bush,
I am sorry to report that mistakes have been made in our campaign for the Southwestern Front. Secrets that should have never come to light have been revealed to our enemy. Our losses were great indeed. The positions we had hoped to hold have been irrevocably damaged and we require your understanding in your matter. I serve at your pleasure always. General Alberto Gonzales."
"My good General Gonzales,
I fear your determination to maintain our assault on the Constitution crisis is starting to falter. I am disappointed that you could not hold our lines steady in New Mexico, and that the losses we have suffered has led me to some inescapable and painful conclusions. As the leader of this Great Battle, it is not my responsibility to accept the blame for these failures, for such an admission would make me appear weak and cowardly before our troops. Therefore, my always loyal Alberto, I am going to have to ask you to draw your sword in the most honorable tradition. For this is a good death for a man who has done fine works. Yours in eternal unitary execution, George W. Bush."
"My dearest Mr. diGenova,
I am writing to you from the enemy's camp. Our campaign to win the Battle of the Plame has not been as successful as we had hoped. We tried valiantly to drive back the enemy with our longstanding, historical alliance with Barry Goldwater and cunning interpretation of statutory intent, but the generals countered our moves with skill and precision and facts. My dear, I fear I shall be in these stockades for some time to come. I miss you terribly. Do not forget to fire the farm hands for me. With much admiration, I remain, your Victoria."
"Dearest Mrs. Waxman,
Fire up the barbecue, baby. We're just gettin' started and I'm hungry. Love, your Henry."
—
So I lost my bet that Abu Gonzales would step down while Valerie Plame testified before the House Oversight Committee. Anybody have ten bucks I can borrow?
Clif at Outside the Tent finds the "Valerie Plame wasn't covert, thus no underlying crime was committed" argument a bit . . . dodgy, at best.
Karl Rove lies? I find that incredibly hard to believe. The Rude Pundit is equally astounded.
James Wolcott mulls over a Fred Thompson run for President. Balloon Juice's John Cole explains why Rudy Giuliani's chances at becoming President are as slim as Nicole Richie in profile. And Jesus' General got his mitts on Rudy's first campaign poster.
TBogg is slightly annoyed that his bet on Gonzales didn't pay out. And Wonkette's a bit annoyed that nobody in the media took notice of Pretty in Pink.
Darth Cheney beat the war drums for AIPAC this week. Don't bother reading the transcript – Norbizness has already translated it for humans.
Spindentist at All Spin Zone finds Jesus is nonstick. 2Millionth Weblog's Mike discovers that Charles Krauthammer's reasoning skills are also nonstick.
Brad Altrocket at Sadly, No! gives a shout out to the Right for such talented con artists. Carl at Simply Left Behind tries to have a rational conversation with conservatives.
Roy over at alicublog runs down this week in wingnuttery. Meanwhile, Roger Ailes notes that publication of Jonah Goldberg's book, Liberal Fascism, has been pushed back . . . again. Maybe publication is contingent upon the Pantload admitting that he's a fucking hypocrite.
Almostinfamous at Fuzzy Words says "feh" to George Bush's "humanitarianism." And I note that Bush was practicing his love with some unsuspecting Guatemalan workers.
Who can turn the world on with a smile? Why, it's Khalid Sheik Mohammed! Not only has he laid claim to the World Trade Center, but 30 other terrorist attacks, as well! Attaturk at Rising Hegemon lists more of KSM's incredible achievements!
Mimus Pauly at Skippy the Bush Kangaroo pens a paean to Fred Barnes. I wish I'd get love letters like that…



78 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
double-you-tee !!
Love ya.
I mean…really!
Who does the interior design for these assclowns. Must be one of Laura’s interior designers.
Strange that there always seems to be some Fra Angelica background for ‘The Idiot’ and ‘Abu Gonzo’ to pose in front of.
MY EYES!! MY EYES!!
I missed Daniel Schorr’s comment on KSM yesterday on NPR, but the spouse caught it and he sez that Schorr said that the KSM stuff is all at least a year or two old.
http://city.udn.com/community/img/PSN_PHOTO/allthingsconsidered/f_130772_1.jpg“>three guesses . . .
While ‘Abu Gonzo’ twists in the wind, good damn place for this war criminal, others are speaking out.
Yeah, ‘We Understand…’.
Indeed, Senator Obama we do understand that we have to take our nation back from these criminals.
If we have to send ‘em all to the gibbet…
So be it.
Unfortunately, today is another travel day (gotta get the car back before it turns into a pumpkin). I get to drive 4 hours back to NYC.
Mind the fort, you fabulous firedoggies!
thanks Watertiger
A new design for a box of cookies?
Is the lack of a podium supposed to say that abu has nothing to hide?
smapdi @ 11
That was my question. Why of all Press Conferences, would you do that one without a podium?
John Casper @ 12
Old trial advocacy technique, coming out from behind a podium or lectern is seen as making you appear more sincere and credible. As Charlie Schultz’s Linus once said: “Always be sincere, whether you mean it or not”.
‘tiger,
love the company you keep. travel safe!
Great post, Watertiger, now have a good trip. Myself, I’m off to capture some groceries. Later.
Miranda
If the Bush regime is America’s contribution to the Alliance, it must be the Chinese who are supplying the brains.
Dong le ma?
From ABC News:
Funnies: March Madness in Gonzales’ Office
The Ken Burns motif was hilarious. That made my day.
goddammit! I KNEW Pretty in Pink was a man! everybody said I was nuts.
Hah!
An OT glancing blow: Joe Seatak (not my favorite, a little too much BlueDog for my taste) on MTP this am, creames DeLay & Pearl’s arguments for surge and overall Middle East strategy. Sounded like a man setting up a future presidential run…
One thing I always say in GA is that I personally I miss the blue dress. The other thing I say when they bring up The Fair to Rich Tax is that I believe in strong middle class.
Jesus, Mary, & Joseph, that rug is LOUD.
Worst presser from Gonzales in memory. Note to Al- figeting & ending early w/out curtain calls is no substitute for a little truth telling.
Gave new meaning to being called on the carpet…from hell.
Re the lack of a podium. He probably didn’t request that. Wonder if some Justice wonk was laughing about it not being present, at his instructions. If nothing else, a podium gives the speaker something to do with his hands. Abu rubbed his hands together, looked like he was plotting as he spoke. That guy is totally out of his experiential competency. Time to go home for him.
New motto. They all wear blue dresses now.
Usually Code Pink people are not so goofy. They oppose the Iraq invasion. I saw no reason for Pretty in Pink to ruin Valerie’s testimony. It seems in opposition to their goals. These are the folks who, in NY, follow Hillary to all her public appearances. But why Valerie?
and there I was, talking to myself at the end of last thread…
TRex, Adie – posted comments to you downstairs.
BTW, I thought I’d check in with the “Rapture Ready” folks to see if Scooter’s conviction and/or any of the latest “loyal Bushie” scandals have affected the Rapture Index (yes, that’s when they predict the Rapture will happen). I thought there might be a rise in the “Liberalism” category, but the index hasn’t been updated since March 5th. It has been creeping up over the past month or so. We continue to be in a time of “heavy prophetic activity”. The Rapture Index
The “End Times Chat” message board has a bit of interesting arguing about KSH’s “confessions”. Interesting to see that while some people are concered about a possible coerced confession, others are not. http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?t=296475
Here’s a laugh!!
http://www.crooksandliars.com/…..the-irack/
newtonusr @ 20
Sestak is very competent. The list of his accomplishments as a naval officer is impressive. I’m concerned about his often blind support for Israel, though. I combed through his speeches on the subject shortly after he was elected, and couldn’t find a single positive reference to Palestine or Palestinians. His comments about the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, even when Howie Klein had him at fdl for a Blue America session, could have been prepared for him by Karl Rove or one of W’s speech writers.
Hey, Watertiger – did you see this?
That gal’s nuts, I tells ya – NUTS!
fyi – Waxman hearing replay on cspan now.
petesdownunder, karen allen, thanks very much for the responses.
OT: FYI.. in case you missed Valerie’s hearing Friday, C-Span 1 is showing it again. Just starting ;)
karen allen @ 25
It made me think of a 21st century homage to Dick Tuck, the great Democratic trickster who made Tricky Dick’s life miserable. Nor do I believe anyone could have ruined Valerie’s testimony, most especially that old gas bag and good ole boy in drag Victoria Toesinger or however the name is spelled. (g)
John Casper @
12
Podium manufacturers don’t make them in “XXS-super-wee” for AbuG. Seriously, have you ever seen the guy behind a podium? Practically disappears.
This Spring, the hot new TV program Sundays at 8–”Are You Smarter than Alberto Gonzales?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i99vjkf6amg
mm @ 35
Can we retitle the program to be are you willing to sell your soul for the president…
Watertiger, yes I have ten maybe a ten spot on Rovewingnut being put out with the other trash.
What say you o wise and honerable one?
sorry. just catching up (man, I wish I had taken Evelyn Woods up on her offer). does anyone in their right mind actually believe that the Administration (ANY Administration) should wait until a criminal investigation into the betrayal of a CIA agent’s identity is over before conducting its own internal investigation? cuz in the meantime whoever commited treason STILL HAS A SECURITY CLEARANCE?!?!?!? are u effin kidding me?
being neither wise nor honorable i say
gonzales
cheney
bush.
rove will skate
listening to Valerie on CSPAN in the other room. man, what a day that was!
oh, and btw, Cheney’s office has its own budget, and he asked for 25 FTEs (that’s people in federal budgetspeak), an increase of 6 over last year. Guess it will take 7 people to replace Libby, eh?
tired fed:
two things:
1. they know who did it.
2. because they told him to do it.
In order not to be hidden behind a podium, the vertically challenged AG had the option of sitting on the podium and swinging his feet or doing without it. He doesn’t have any good choices these days.
fahrender. agreed. but to use the Fitz investigation/trial/appeal an an excuse not to conduct an internal investigation is appalling.
Sally @ 43
I used to work for a vertically challenged type, not unlike Abu. One day he was speaking to us as a group. No podium in the room, so he sat on a table and swung his feet. Way to make yourself look good there, chief!
In 50 years Bush will have his own Godwin designation.
I think Stewart was right – he looks like he’s at the spelling bee.
NSL
USA
WMD
NSA
CIA
OMG
spells – ?
For Christy/John C
US Atty offices stories were July-ish of 2006, but all seem archived and hard to access now, but this is still ez to find:
http://oversight.house.gov/Doc…..-74936.pdf
Letter from Conyers and Waxman demanding some info about it and citing some of the press stories. I’m just guessing that neither one of them has forgotten this yet.
I expect to see a long line of Bush Administration officials stretching from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave to Big Hank’s hearing room, starting with Dr. Knodell’s boss.
TiredFed @ 49
Will Josh Bolten try to use Knodell’s “I’m new here” card? (pun intended, since Andy Card’s Bolten’s predecessor….)
OT – another example of how the Shrub administration uses the Constitution to suit them:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..01149.html
Wonder if Pickles designed THAT rug, too. She seems fixated on the Sun King motif, like the one she did for the Oaffal Orifice.
so what’s on the agenda for tomorrow in congress?
watertiger says “Does this rug make me look incompetent?”
Goddam that’s funny.
I laughed so hard everyone in the room looks at me like I’m crazy, then shakes their head, because as usual I’m living in computer world.
Mary4 @ 48
Thanks, Mary4. That narrowed it down enough for me to snag the right article, I think. Here is headline & couple of paragraphs. Will email entire article to Christy:
L.A. Times July 25, 2006 Article-
Attorney’s Offices’ Staffing Is Decried
Two lawmakers upbraid Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales, saying cases are going unprosecuted.
“Two congressmen called Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales to account Monday for severe staffing shortages and cutbacks in U.S. attorney’s offices across the nation, which they say have halted prosecution of important cases including bank robberies, immigrant smuggling and tax fraud.
U.S. Reps. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles) and John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said in a letter to Gonzales that federal prosecutors had been starved of resources although for four years the Justice Department’s budget had grown faster than inflation — from $1.349 billion in fiscal year 2001 to $1.588 billion in 2006….”
That rug really brings the room together.
Why is he standing on Henry VIII’s rug?
One day Bush loyalists will look around and be struck by how many of their kind Bush has blown away with his own special IEDs. Great for confidence building as they go about his dirty work.
On the blue part of the rug- are those stains?
Hi, watertiger.
The more I see him the more he earns the title Seedy Gonzales.
This will of course prompt a right-wing chorus charging racism. The same pearl clutchers who are always happy about Ann Coulter telling it like it is, no matter how politically incorrect.
-GSD
when did they fly the rug over from Saddam’s palace?
In EPU-land; but in case anyone is still here – has this been posted? Sorry if I am late to this, too:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031807A.shtml
At highly charged moments, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales can seem placid, passive – at times, just plain out of it. In the summer of 2002, high-level Bush administration officials met to debate secretly a delicate issue: how aggressively could the CIA interrogate terror suspects? While the lawyers from Justice, Defense and the vice president’s office hotly debated definitions of torture (at times discussing specific interrogation techniques), Gonzales, who was then the White House counsel, sat by and said virtually nothing. The attorney general’s behavior was typical, say administration officials who have worked with him.
U.S. Attorneys across the nation investigate seven (7) times as many Democratic officials as they investigate Republican officials
TeddySanFran @ 50
And just who the hell is DR. JOHN KNODELL?
Did he just get manufactured in the embryo-tubes of Halliburton as a “Suicide Soldier” (early model reject…has appropriate loyalty factor but general metabolic system flaws)?
The guy has NO RECORD on Google, Netscape or any other search engine regarding his prior academic or employment history ASFAIK.
Maybe he has a created identity courtesy of the “witness protection” program?
Valerie Plame had more stuff on Google than this guy does!
cleter @ 57
Maybe there’s a trapdoor under there?
The question is…would Gonzalez be more like Woolsey or Cromwell? Both loyal to a flaw…and both ended up arrested and facing execution.
karen allen @ 25
I agree totally, Karen. What could one possibly gain by upstaging a Waxman inquiry, fer Chrissakes?
Al Bugnocchi, a dish best served cold.
Just another Texas crony. Amazing he’s lasted this long.
cinnamonape @ 65
he ain’t no Sir Francis Walsingham, you can bet your money on that
smapdi @ 63
___________________________________________
Well, duh….. Fascinating article. Thanks for the reference. And thanks for all the wonderful posts this afternoon. Hope the perfect book salon editor/organizer is raised up from among the community.
More Goldwater references? Well, I still think it’s time to bring him back:
Exhume Goldwater ‘08!
The propagandistic subtext of the passive subjunctive phrase “mistakes were made” is as follows:
1. Use of the passive verb “were made” implies that Al Torquemada Gonzales didn’t do it- someone else did. He was out of the loop, not responsible, etc.
2. Subjunctive vs Indicative Mood. The latter indicates clear statements of fact, whereas the former expresses a mood that expresses something desired.
Putting the two together in the current context we get:
Something happened, I wish it hadn’t, but since I, Alberto, didn’t have anything to do with it, I get to keep my job.
Yet another example of Bush Administration unaccountability.
Pitiful.
The firings of US attorney Carol C. Lam and Daniel Bogden were connected through one case that just so happened to be the first time the Patriot Act was used in a non-terrorism related case. The investigation, and the subsequently comprehensive search for financial records ended up getting Sheldon Adelson, the 6th richest man in the world and fervent Bush supporter, involved by highlighting $190,000 of contributions he gave to the now convicted ex-County Commissioner and Lobbyist Lance Malone. It is a highly complicated case that demonstrates that Mark Corallo, who has worked as spokesman for both Karl Rove and Attorney General Gonzales, and also at the Republican National Committee was most likely the go-between to help spur these firings on behalf of Sheldon Adelson.
Visit my blog for the story and for future updates: http://misterapologist.blogspot.com/
hey watertiger, as usual, thx 4 the linkie love…
So many great sites, so little time. So many talented writers and responders, so much to share.
It’s a good thing I’m old and retired, otherwise I wouldn’t be able to spend hours a day just on FDL (with frequent rest breaks).
Will just comment on the great list of authors/sites in this article. Perhaps regarding Abu and Bush you might be inclined to also reference Paul Craig Roberts at
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts202.html
particularly his reference to the Murray Waas March 15, 2007 article in the National Journal.
‘Tiger
As always, thanks for the mention!
OK, here’s an inconsistency in the gonzales/bush position (one of many I guess):
first they say: president gets to choose his USAs and they serve at his pleasure, and
then they say: “I didn’t know this was going on.”
sooooo, if bush appoints USAs that he wants, and then fires them when he doesn’t want them anymore, how can he or any administration official claim they didn’t know the firings were going on?
further, if they did know (which is clearly the truth), and if the firings weren’t political, then why try to hide the real motives? obviously rove et al hoped to situate their new choices in these key states in time to create havoc among the democrats in the run-up to the 2008 elections.
Many possible scenerios on how the DOJ scandal might play out. The Bush Administration is most likely counting heads for a coming showdown with Congress. It appears they are going to hang tough on Gonzales. Should Congress issue subpoenas to Administration officals I have a feeling they will just ignore them. Don’t count on the mainstream media coming to the defense of the Republic. They will just say that the Administration is playing out the Unitary Presidency to it’s logical conclusion. What could Congress do then? After all, as Stalin once said concerning Vatican opposition to the USSR, “How many divisions do they have?” If the House should decide to draw up articles of impeachment on Gonzales and it goes to the Senate for adudication, if the Republicans hang tough (for a Republican, loyalty to Party is what counts) then Gonzales won’t go anywhere.