
Here's Waxman's committee hearing page. Here are the witnesses:
- Ms. Valerie Plame Wilson, former employee, Central Intelligence Agency
- Dr. James Knodell, Director, Office of Security, The White House
- Mr. Bill Leonard, Director, Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives and Records Administration
- Mr. Mark Zaid, Attorney
- Ms. Victoria Toensing, diGenova & Toensing, LLP
Panel number two is upcoming: Mark Zaid and Victoria Toensing will be giving testimony. Wondering who Mark Zaid is? Well lookee here. And Victoria Toensing? Try reading here for starters.
Feed the comments with updates, gang, and we'll try to send in some hearing room color for the main page post on fifteen minute intervals.
____________________
2:00 pm ET:
Toensing says she has represented a covert officer, and is pleased that a journalist printed the name of her client, a former covert CIA officer, despite being asked by the CIA not to do so. (CHS says: wow, she's swell, isn't she?)
Zaid talks about the jeopardy involved in the exposure of a CIA agent. Look both at the criminality, but also at the administrative disciplines that ought to have been meted out to those who violated clearance requirements.
Rep. Waxman goes into how Toensing reached her conclusions. She says that Valerie is "not a covert agent under the Act." Toensing now arguing whether Hayden understands what "covert" means. Doesn't know whether she can talk about what was or was not leaked — because Toensing wants to argue about what the meaning of "leak" is? Do you have first hand information that people at the White House have knowledge that she was a covert agent? No. Says she has information only through testimony at the trial.
Toensing now going on and on about testimony at trial not including information on covert status again, despite knowing that Judge Walton had a limiting instruction on any testimony regarding covert status information before the trial ever started.
2:10 pm ET:
Zaid says that he is stunned that further investigation and Administrative action has not been taken care of here.
Toensing says that some agencies do and some do not suspend clearance pending an investigation. Goes into questions that may arise of trying to interfere with a criminal investigation.
Toensing: "I have no problem with Ms. Plame, and I appreciate the service that she gave to her country." [CHS says: I don't even know what to say here.] And she's now going into her prosecutorial misconduct litany.
Rep. Cummings going into the Toensing Op-Ed issue — "foreign assignment" parsing of language and statutory authority. [CHS says: Toensing is filibustering her answers with the Dems.]
Ex. Order 12958 — Hayden's approval of Waxman's statement that Ms. Wilson's status was classified, that she was a covert agent protected under the aforementioned Executive Order.
Rep. Watson going into the Toensing assertions in her WaPo Op-Ed now. "It seems to me that your remarks are contrary to Ms. Wilson's statement here. Do you still maintain that she was not a covert agent?" Toensing says "not under the law." Rep. Watson is very carefully guarding her time. Toensing says that she did not talk to either the CIA or Valerie Wilson about Valerie's employment status. Toensing says that under "her" statute, Valerie isn't what she would qualify as "covert" in her legal interpretation. Rep. Watson says she isn't asking about IIPA — in contrast, she's asking about Administrative rules under the Executive order.
Prohibits both reckless and negligent disclosures of classified information — and violates the executive order even though it does not violate the IIPA? Toensings stalls and tap dances and then asks for the question to be repeated. Yes, that is correct.
2:21 pm ET:
Toensing says she has no idea why the WH gave out this information. It makes sense to Toensing that the Veep's office would say they didn't send them — his wife did, based on Toensing's interpretation of the INR.
Rep. Van Hollen saying that they are looking into how the WH safeguards classified information. Did not know that the WH had not looked into anything with regard to the security breach. Toensing says that had she been WH counsel, she would have told them not to do anything at all whatsoever once the criminal investigation was started.
Van Hollen says — what about the two month period where no investigation was taking place? That sort of investigation is routine for these sorts of disclosures, right? Toensing now blames David Corn for Valerie's disclosure — says David published Valerie's covert status before Novak. Van Holen says he understands her focus is on the criminal aspect, but that he finds it stunning that the WH has never done any investigation into the disclosure.
Toensing says "shame on the CIA." Toensing now blaming Grenier for not telling the Vice President and/or Libby that Valerie's status was classified or covert — says this came from corss-examination testimony.
Toensing says that she has no problem with the WH press secretary telling the public the truth. That they should be forthright with the public. Van Hollen asks whether the WH had some obligation to discover whether the disclosure of sensitive information might have caused problems for the CIA and for a NOC and her networks.
Van Hollen says that government officials do not often use covert or classified information used against them for political purposes.
Rep. Waxman asks Zaid whether Rove, Libby and others had been treated with much better — Zaid says yes.
Waxman says that he is going to hold the record open, and check Toensing's statements on the record. Waxman says he will be checking with Fitzgerald on his interpretation of the law. [CHS asks: Is it me, or is that a "correct the record, or there may be a perjury question in the offing if we find errors in your testimony?"]
Toensing now doing a dance with her files all by her lonesome at the table in front of the C-Span cameras. And that is a wrap for the hearing today.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

PLAME!!
Waxman!
MWAA-HAAA-HAAAAAA!!
WAXMAN!
VALERIE! JANE! DELBERT!
Hi TRex….. hard to work with all this going on… boy do I want to yank on that dyejob bimbo… what a horses patute…
‘People start corruption, people can stop it‘
Was there a lost devil’s egg found under some rock that was incubated in someone’s basement that hatched this “woman?”? I need to go take a zantac or 2 or 3.
That the WH launched no investigation on its own makes Bush a liar. Didn’t he say they were going to “get to the bottom of this?” Maybe they were already there.
Cummins, smooth operator.
Hi! Was out for lunch. Can anybody tell me if/when CSPAN cut back to the hearing? I was taping it. I might have to set my alarm to go off every hour on the hour until I pick up the re-broadcast. They always re-broadcast the best hearings in the middle of the frikkin night!
Valerie,
I think it was the Father of all Lies….
Geesh…
What a tool….
Plame wasn’t a covert agent????? So, Plame was confused or lying about her status???? And the sun orbits the earth, too.
This woman is deranged.
Oh yeah. She’s a Republican.
“in the DNA of every cell in my body”
eloquent
Waxman: “I’m not yielding my time to you.” He knows how to play that game.
Vicki: I have no problem with Plame, but I do with the CIA
Cummings, “Me too, bitch.”
CUMMINGS ROCKS!!!!
go Cummings!!
I LOVE HOW CUMMINGS ALWAYS BRINGS IT RIGHT DOWN TO THE SIMPLE CLEAR TRUTH. (channeling Delbert cuz LORD am I psyched)
Calling G. Gordon Liddy. . .
Vicki trying to make distinction between foreign assignment and going out of the country
mandrake, they were only cut away from the hearing for about 10-15 minutes.
I rarely watch TV or web-based video. I had no idea how offensive this woman is. She is hostile and arrogant and seriously ugly.
Hmmm. Well, we know aboaut Toensing, but Zaid – skimmed that link, but not sure where he’s coming from, based on the summary of his testimony.
What’s his connection to Sibel Edmonds? Represent her?
I’m confused now.
But – re Toensing’s argumetns – sounds like she’s trying to throw bright shiny objects to distract from Ms. Plame’s clear and straightforeward testimony. anybody else?
Of course, I’m peeking in on lunch hour again, maybe I’ve skimmed too fast to get it…
WAXMAN and VAN HOLLEN STAFFERS! Nail her on this!
Oh he brings up her compost article!
I am so glad Victoria Toesning is on their side. Yikes, she is awful.
Shorter icki…
The earth is flat, because I said so
Those hands again
CIA DIRECTOR HAYDEN
SAYS COVERT!
TunSing
trying to lie about the actual quoted lines from her WaPo jury tampering article
Thanks, RevDeb!
Waxman clarifies that Plame was covert, according to head of CIA Admiral Hayden
Toensign is another Republican loyalist that will be with the boy king in the bunker when his reign is mercifully brought to a close!
Watson
going after the WaPO peice too.
Yes yes yes
Toe Suck clearly likes to play the “intimidation” game: attempting “strong” soap-boxing to blow back anyone who might want to disagree with her.
OT: From Ana Marie Cox at Time – Swampland (so take it for what it is worth) – there may be new emails released on Attorneygate at 6PM tonight.
I just turned CSPAN on and heard Waxman read the statement from the CIA that Plame was covert. So Toensing is saying she is right and the CIA is wrong about whether one of its agents was covert? Astounding.
icky keeps talking about “the statute”.
Let’s not forget, there are other rules covering classified info.
Watson will have her for lunch.
Watson
Using TunSing’s WaPo article to impeach her
Ohhh!
Ms. Watson has the floor…..
Now dear…
Squeeze real hard….
Watson: Do you still maintain on October Plame was not a covert agent?
Vicki: not according to statute
If Toensing thinks Valerie Plame wasn’t covert, then why should anybody listen to anything else she has to say?
She’s relying very heavily on legalese regarding the statute.
She is argumentative and contemptible– slap her in cuffs!
god what a bitch
Vicki: I helped draft that law
Watson
Asking if TunSing has secret knowledge
ker pow!
Ouch. Cutting her off. Reclaiming my time.
Toensing is just flying in the face of reality that Plame was not covert although the CIA says she was. What kind of hubris is this?
Toensing is saying, in effect, that although CIA says Plame was covert, and Plame testified under oath she was covert, and CIA cleared statement that she was support, despite all of that — Toensing says Valerie was “not covert under the law.” Therefore, as Mr. Barkis said, “the law is an ass,” and she drafted this law.
This woman is Very obviously a Bush Boot Licker, and trying to defend them! She is now declaring that despite what Valerie said this morning, she was NOT covert. But she keeps adding ‘under the law’, whatever the f*** that means! Thank God that the panel is not letting her get away with this bullshit.
Now she’s contradicting Plame and Hayden.
Toensing=hacktacular bitch
get lost Vicky!!
Legal interpretation and she wrote the law and is the law. What arrogant hubris.
She ahas to keep repeating that line about “the statute” because the entire house of cards comes down otherwise.
Diane Watson —- you go girll!
Will it shut Toensing up if Waxman calls Gen Hayden to testify as to Valerie Plame Wilson’s status?
She’s just deranged, a lunatic:
The CIA warned Novak and Libby not to divulge Plame’s name or status at the CIA before Novak’s piece ran. Both Novak and Libby ignored clear warnings by the CIA:
http://www.prospect.org/webfea…..02-12.html
She has no idea what info she has. More like it. She’s going by a very narrow interpretation of the law.
TunnSing
I HELPED draft the act
Important question
What do all the other people who HELPED draft the act think it means?
Toestink: I know what the law requires. Not under the law.
Watson: “This is your statement, ‘Plame was not covert.’”
Toestink: “I still maintain it. Under the law. I am giving you my legal interpretation. She has to live outside the USA.”
Watson: “Reclaiming my time.”
Toesstink: “I didn’t talk to Ms. Wilson or the CIA.”
Watson: Do you have any knowledge of Ms. Wilson’s employement status that Ms Wilson [or her employers] don’t have.”
Toestink: They can call anyone anyting they like under the law.
Watson: “I’m talking about the order, not the crminal statute.”
It seems to me, listening to Ms. Toestink, that the statute was drafted to protect political appointees who might want to selectively expose CIA agents, as opposed to protecting the CIA agents. Anyone else get that feeling?
Vicki is claiming she knows more about the CIA than the head of the CIA
Why doesn’t someone ask her about the language of the statute to which she keeps alluding, so they can smack `er down on it?
I keep waiting for someone to ask icky Vicky how many times the IIPA has been used effectively?
Love that pickle face she makes when she gets slapped…..
watson reminds the bitch that she was invited to speak about the Executive order, not the crim statute.
Has anyone asked Toensing what her Party affiliation is?
Watson’s bringing up the other rules now!!!
oohhhh, cat fight!!
If a Democratic White House had outed Valerie Plame, Toensing would be heading the lynch mob. Since it is a Republican one, she is left defending the indefensible.
Waxman and Van Hollen Staffers: READ AND HEED!
Vicki is stalling
YEEAAAAHHH!!
Watson is nailing her to the wall.
Earlier she said that since she drafted the law, SHE knows what the intent of the framers was & how it should be interpreted. So buzz off, you pesky Congress Critters!
Looks like Toensing’s favorite rhetorical fallacy is the appeal to authority. “I helped draft the law. I know what it means. Therefore, I know what a covert agent is.”
And so I ask again, “Tell us, Ms. Toetap, who did you vote for?”
Better question
What does a COURT think the act means?
I love Ms Watson!
I bet they told Opie to take a hike and not ask any dumb questions.
WHY was SHE invited?
Watson did that without a flaw!
How in the world can the Repub’s just sit out this hearing?
What does it say about the R party that they don’t care about this case?
This is not a criminal investigation, but a government oversight hearing, miss Tossing.
Nice move. Like she was doing the swim dance.
Vicki: I have no idea why WH gave out that info
Shorter Natasha: “I am the law!”
WHY was SHE invited?
Presumably Davis’s pick.
He never said he was sent by the VP! He was sent by CIA in response to an inquiry by the VP! Don’t let her get away with it!
Please, please, please ask her party affiliation.
Hey, she acknowledged they leaked it. We’re getting somewhere.
“Yess, icky, you’re right, your statute DOES SUCK, because it has no teeth!!!
litigatormom
Only if they are Republicans.
Waxman is quietly sharpening a stake under the table.
I guess she doesn’t care about perjuring herself.
Can you imagine having a marital argument with this woman?
Is this just a caucasion version of Condi Rice up here?
Ms. Toestink seems to not want to talk about the Executive Order, only the criminal statute. I guess that’s because she wants to talking about her expertise, and to lobby for Libby’s pardon.
And of course, as long as Libby wasn’t convicted of an IIPA violation, then exposing a covert agent’s identity is okay — as long as its just a violation of an executrive order, not a criminal statute, she’s fair gaime.
I’m sorry guys, I am feverish and my typing skills are deteriorating. Am I have a fever hallucination, or is this woman speaking gibberish?
Ask her Party affiliation!!!
“You admit she DID work for the CIA, right?”
“I wrote the law! I wrote the law! I am the law!”
Vicki: I didn’t know the WH didn’t do any investigation
Perjury Vicky. You are entitled to your opinion, not your own facts.
Somebody ought to tell her that law she claims to have helped to write sucks. Far too restrictive. Gee, maybe that’s why I heard it’s only been used once to prosecute a leak case. Too difficult to break that law.
She is physically deflating on my tv screen. Looks like she got kicked in the stomach. That tone of hers has toned down now a tad. Shit, this is great.
I can’t wait for the McClellen book.
Now back to the criminal investigation. Why not use the two months before the criminal investigate to investigate?
And we have Bullshit Bingo with the mention of David Corn.
Vicki: I’m not here to speak for McLellan
Samia @ 98:
I cannot even imagine being in the same room as this woman. She is an embarrassment to the legal profession.
Now she’s a teacher! OMG!
ROTFLMAO!!!!! literally!
David Corn noted Valerie’s employment?
I literally have shivers going up and down my spine as I watch this. Notice how many of the committee members have also loosened up their body language in response to Vicki’s flailings.
Wait, what was that about David Corn? Did he publish this too?
Now saying David Corn outed Plame. WTF?
All that’s missing is Jon Stewart to give her the Tucker Carlson treatment.
Yes. Stunning.
Further proof that Corn is a operative.
Mauimom, yeah, she’s getting much, much more subdued. And very defensive.
VT: “But I say, shame on the CIA”.
TunSing
Shame on the CIA
The briefer (Griener) it’s all his fault
What fertilizer
David Corn???
“But I say, shame on the CIA.” Gawd, her tone of voice is unbelievable.
Back to CIA-bashing.
“Shame on the CIA!” says she. Oh, God. Let there be justice.
What about the moral code of releasing this info?
Next question that should be asked… if she was not covert, why did the CIA request an investigation? (That would open up an assertion from her that the CIA was behaving in partisan fashion, methinks.)
Her cheek bags are getting a little darker….
She said Corn wrote (?) that Valerie was CIA.
A prize to the first congresscritter who says ‘no, shame on you.’
VT: “I think a press secretary should always say what’s accurate.” BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Who fucking mentioned press secretaries, Vicki?
How busy must the folks at The Daily SHow and the Colbert Report be today?
So much material, so little time
Why do they bother arguing with her? What she needs is to be bitchslapped!
Dear Keith Olbermann:
I have a suggestion for tonight’s Worst Person in the World.
She seems to be morphing from the “I’m gonna beat up you wimpy suckers” attitude to “I’m on your side; be nice to me.”
As long as we’re making fun of Toestink’s fashion sense, why is she wearing rouge — it sure as hell isn’t blush — that is the same screaming fire engine red as her. hair and suit?
Someone needs to send this woman to a segment of “What Not To Wear.” As well as back to law school.
soon after the Novak column, Corn wrote an article saying, “good grief, the WH just outed an agent.” Since then, it has been a standards right wing talking point that Corn outed Plame.
Toensing: Let me just tell you about me.
I don’t think Natasha really wants to get into a pissing contest with the CIA.
I’m completely fascinated by those hands…
Why do they bother arguing with her? What she needs is to be bitchslapped!
I’m glad a woman said that.
Gotta love HWax.
Victoria Toensing- I wonder how it feels to have a snake for a mother?
You wouldn’t think a red flag would go off if someone is in the CIA that you thought worked for a consulting firm? That wouldn’t send off a fucking red flag to you?
Squirming Vicky. She says it’s laughable to have a covert deskjob.
“I’ve never been covert.” Oh, yeah, you’d be a really good candidate for that!
Why does Victoria hate covert agents? Wonder how inflated her check book is lately?
Jayt @ 139 – would that be Toesuck?
The Corn canard is that he was the first person to use the word ‘covert’ while Douchebag of Liberty used the word ‘operative’, even though Douchebag had only ever used ‘operative’ to mean covert. (See: Josh Marshall, passim.)
Shorter Toesuck: I speak with absolute authority pulled straight from my ass.
What is her security clearance level?
me too me too! me too!!! what a tool
I don’t think Natasha really wants to get into a pissing contest with the CIA.
I think she already has….
Man, this is one pissing match I’m rooting for!! Go, CIA, go!!!
Toestink reminds covert agents who might be Democrats that she’s available to represent them.
request of the minority to have you as a witness! woo hoo!!
And I wonder about how the snake feels.
Zaid: I represent Repugs and Dems
Waxman: for the record, we didn’t invite you, you lying sack of shit.
Thanks Scarecrow. I didn’t know that.
Can you image any Democrat hiring Icky Vicky as counsel?
Waxman
Just asked the fitz “2 hour” question
He asked if Cheney Rove Fleischer et al
Were treated better than Zaid’s clients
Zaid- Much better than my clients were treated
Ask the PantLoad..
The blatant disregard for government workers is pretty scary, isn’t it?
MZ: “I represent both Republicans and Democrats” [laughter] VT: “Me too.” Bwahahaha.
oooh – Henry says that Vicky lied – “we’re leaving the record open”!!
HAAA!!!!
Wow. This lady is sure a piece of work. What John Dean refers to as a “double high”.
Is Victoria Toensing the Magda Goebbels of the Republican Party? She can’t stand the thought of living in a world without her leader.
The stake is out – the hearing is being held open to investigate her false statements. Yeahhhh – she was there because of the minority
“we’ll check that fact out also” OUCH!!!!
Waxman tells Vicki committee is pleased to have her on behalf of the minority
Waxman rocks!!! Going to fact-check her facts. Woo hoo!!!
Good, , ,basketball!
Waxman acknowledging Davis invited Icky Vicki.
(waving to Waxman staffers!)
Waxmand: Some of the statements you’ve made without any doubt and with great authority as I understand may not be accurate.
Thank you Ms. Toensing, and we will hold the record open so we can correct the obvious
liesmistakes you’ve voiced here today.Hey, Vicky! Don’t ya think that Fitz would have subpoenaed David Corn years ago?!?
What. A. Tool.
Of course, she knows that with the GOP/Media Complex using the he-said-she-said principle, her utter bullshit will be given exactly the same weight as Valerie Plame’s truth.
Toensing: Me too! I represent Democrats too!
No, you can kiss that gig goodbye.
That’s all, folks!
Waxman calls TunSing a liar to her face!
Committee stands ajourned and LHP finally goes to the office!
Waxman stating outright that she was there at the request of the Republicans. And that they were keeping her testimony open for further questions!
‘Hello, CIA? I’d like to arrange for a special rendition. Can you transfer this call to the appropriate person?’
Waxman – You are lying Vicki!
Hahahaha: “We accommodated the Minority to let you testify. Many of the statements you made may not be accurate.”
Love it.
Waxman: You knowledge is based on the law you wrote 30 years ago
Toestink: “Don’t date me that much. I was only 25.”
Waxman: “We’ll check that out too.”
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
The more you hear, the more you have questions wrt 9/11. The towers held an awful ot of government workers.
Waxman: “Some of the statements you made with great authority may not be accurate, so we’re going to hold the record open.”
LOVE IT!!!!!
… VT: “I was 25.”
Wax: “We’re going to check that out too.”
YES!!!
Did I tell you how much I dislike that beyotch!
Thank you, Van Hollen, for that last question. I have been waiting for that one to come out.
OH, BURRRRRRRRRRRRRRN!!!
“We’ll check that out also.”
Buh Bye…and uh, we’re going to check into the veracity of your statements, dear….so fasten your seatbelts.
It’s unbelievable how quickly the room emptied behind Toensing.
“we’re leaving the record open”
I think Vicki just shit herself.
pwrlght says
March 16th, 2007 at 11:29 am
Jayt @ 139 – would that be Toesuck?
Oh yeah.
Standing ovsation round of applause please from
Firedoglake to
‘
BIG HANK
Waxman: “your knowledge is based on having helped draft the law 30 years ago.” VT: “Don’t date me back that far, I was 25″. Waxman: “we’ll check that fact out also”. [laughter]
I think it was “it was 25″, not “I was 25″, but Waxman’s comeback was perfect, and the room knew it.
Was that 25 in dog years?
Is it just me, or did Waxman just make a threat, with a smile on his face?
Nah – he firmly planted the stake – said she was lying. Stupid woman.
She was there because the Republicans needed one of their shills for damage control. I hope they can find something on the Party loyalist to bring her up on perjury charges.
Waxman! Oh, SNAP!
Vicki, vicki, vicki, Waxman just filleted you, and your sucking up at the end got you nowhere.
I love me some Harry Wax.
I used to cut class in high school to watch the Watergate hearings and I have to say that I have not seen or heard anything in the years since that was as electrifying as the high points of those hearings.
Until today.
March 16th, 2007 at 11:30 am
Hayduke at # 171 says:
Where can I find that reference?
THAT was better than sex.
Waxman’s closing was amazing. Ms. Toensing, General Haydn, Mr. Fitzgerald and Ms. Plame all have a different opinion than you – and we’ll be checking out everything you’ve testified to here with such great authority – meantime holding the record open until we’ve set it all straight.
LOL
I note that the mike is open (picking up background noise). Wouldn’t you LOVE to hear “well SHE was a lying sack of shit, wasn’t she” from someone?
I’d like to see Marcy help correct the record.
Is Victoria Toensing the Magda Goebbels of the Republican Party? She can’t stand the thought of living in a world without her leader.
ask her kids.
Holding open the record to check out Toensing’s allegations is Big Hank’s way of putting the WH on notice about one thing:
We’re not done here, folks!
Accountability. Coming soon to a White House near you.
What a disgusting display by that skenky ugly bottomfeeding bitch!!! I almost puked during her testimony.
WOnder if Vicky will feeel the joy of sitting in the dock ?
I wonder how soon the transcript of her testimony will be ready.
It needs some parsing
Best she get back to her masters to find out what lies to tell next cause Waxman just waxed her ass.
So, are they going to prosecute if they find she lied under oath?
So TRex, whatcha gonna write about tonight? ;-)
Is Waxman implying perjury? I think he was.
Waxman pushed Vicky T-bag in front of the bus on the way out of the hearing.
Sweet.
-GSD
Glorious. Waxman essentially reduced Tossing into an irrelevant, lying clown.
What Old Hippie Chick @ 211 said.
Mmmmmmm… the moments after…I need a quiet little cigarette…
OleHippieChick says:
THAT was better than sex.
I need a cigarette after Waxman’s closing.
Is it just me, or did Waxman just make a threat, with a smile on his face?
I think Waxman has to grant the ranking member’s request for witnesses who’ll back up their views, but he felt obligated to wash his hands of her presence, in her presence.
Scarecrow: The law is a ass is Mr. Bumble. Barkus “is willin’.”
That was the best, thanks firedoglake. For everything.
Now, that was interesting…..
Fun watching it all with you….
Sign off for now….
Love you guys….
Is Victoria Toensing the Magda Goebbels of the Republican Party? She can’t stand the thought of living in a world without her leader.
ask her kids.
I hope she doesn’t invite Putin over for a tea party with the youngins.
-GSD
To all of you @ FDL, you are the best.
I think Waxman Hearings are the Lay’s potato chips of FDL: No one can take just one.
Toensing asserts as the whole truth and nothing but the truth, facts taken from public testimony. She asserts this as if it were her personal knowledge. Public testimony, of course, may be true, but it only responds to specific limited questions. The truth may also reside in what was not asked, or the context that was left unsaid.
Ann in AZ at 211:
In “Conservatives Without Conscience.” He’s talking about double high authoritarians. People who believe (1) that everyone needs to be told what to do all the time about every aspect of their lives, (2) except themselves, who are the ones who are supposed to be the ones telling them.
High-ranking wingnut crap transmitters like Natasha are so used to being insulated from the consequences of their actions that they get incredibly sloppy — and then look oh so shocked when they’re called on it.
DAYUM, 230 comments in 30 minutes.
Well, we all knew Henry was whittling the point of that stake to a pinpoint. And it went all the way through. I love that man!
I’m off tonight. I’m going out to dinner with the B-52’s. Chicago Dyke will be here to entertain you.
Oh, SNAP, Waxman!
Balrog
I think Waxman had a satffer looking for some key statement and that Vicki must have made it.
I doubt he would have said what he did if he did not believe he had a perjury.
Don’t know if he is right, but it would be fun to spread out that transcript on my dining room table and take a microscope to it
My thoughts exactly!
Ann in AZ–Where can I find that reference?
It’s from Dean’s Conservatives Without Conscience, and is a term from his primary social psychology researcher, Bob Altemeyer of the Univ. of Manitoba. It means someone who scores high on social dominator scales and also high on the RWA (right-wing authoritarian) scale.
Somebody please tell me how I don’t start drinking early?!
According to Wikipedia, Vicki graduated from college in 1962, making her 42 in 1982 when the law that she claims to know so well was written.
I believe that 25 and 42 are rather different.
Wasn’t it drafted back in Ford’s day? Or was it Reagan’s?
Big Hank!
Okay, whuttawedonow!
**twiddles thumbs**
Man. I’m a drunk, but Vickie’s obviously an alcoholic.
I love the smell of Republicans burning in the morning. And in the afternoon.
what does holding the record open mean. Are they going to check if she was lying? Is she going to be confronted with her lies, are her lies going to be removed from the record?
TRex:
Just a pretty sentence, just had to be repeated.
Will Donita be upstairs soon? We need her…
Holding a committee hearing: $40,000
Subpoena’ing moonbats: $18,000
The look of raw anger and rabid fear on Toensing’s face as she stands at table, post gavel. Priceless.
Tap Duncan @ 245
It’s beer-thirty somewhere!
Ah, that was fun watching that but while we have been watching there is this from the AP:
White House backs off on Miers scenario By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 21 minutes ago
WASHINGTON – The White House on Friday backed off its earlier contention that then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers first raised the idea of firing U.S. attorneys — an act that led to a firestorm of criticism of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
It has been described as her idea but … I don’t want to try to vouch for origination,” said White House press secretary Tony Snow, who previously had asserted Miers was the person who came up with the idea. “At this juncture, people have hazy memories.”
Tap Duncan, it’s a holiday weekend,St Pattys Day, have a drink for petes sakes.
FDL, thanks so much for covering this. Stuck here at work with no cable tv, so I can’t watch this in real time. I think, however, I might get a wee taste of it from Keith. A pity Jon Stewart doesn’t do a Friday night show.
Boy Vicky T-Bag must make those Republicans who hated Bill Clinton’s parsing of words so damn proud.
-GSD
MK 245: I think she said she wrote the statue 25 years ago, not that she was 25 when she wrote it.
Tap: Go for it. Maybe they’ll replay it on CSPAN tomorrow and you can start all over again.
Happy St. Paddy’s (early) – my favorite day!!
Ed*ard Teller says
I love the smell of Republicans burning in the morning. And in the afternoon.
Smells like….Democracy!
My Tin Roof. . .Rusted!
Let the trials begin. Republicans must be held accountable for all their crimes against the American people and the world. From dogcatcher on up through President there needs to be a legal open season on these traitors!
I feel sorry for Zaid. He seemed like a dweeb when he first showed up, but he seemed to know what he was talking about. He was probably sitting there all that time hoping none of Waxman’s hellfire and brimstone launched at Vicki landed on him…or maybe he amused himself with how long it would be before he saw puddles forming around her feet.
Tough to say.
She claims to talk to CIA “employees” often. Uhhhhhhh, not anymore babe, you’re a radioactive political operative blabbermouth who believes CIA ‘employees’ are fair game.
Republican scumbag lies unravel when people look too closely…
MSNBC just teased an upcoming segment on Val’s testimony and calls it a “bombshell” that she didn’t send her husband on that trip.
Maybe more folks will start getting it now?
Peterr Great to be with you here again, seems like old times!!!
“At this juncture, people have hazy memories.”
That theory is no loger operative.
Can’t ya smell that smell.
-GSD
Awesome, tell them I said thank you for the song Legal Tender, it was the song responsible for my divergence onto the freaky music fan path I’ve been on ever since.
Yes-a cigarette would feel so-natural.
I loved how cspan allowed the camera to roll on lone Toesing at the end….
Y’know, I can just about cope with Blue Dogs fucking things up in the chamber, as long as it keeps Waxman at work, because he’s got a to-do list stretching from the Capitol to the White House.
I thought I heard Vicki say Steven somebody wrote about Plame before Novak, not David Corn. Will there be a transcript available?
Peterr, I bet it’s beer-thirty at Knodell’s house.
Trex, THE B-52s???
I am SOOOO jealous.
But FDlers aren’t chopped liver and I guess it’s time to shower and get outta my pajamas.
(Saw the B-s 3 summers ago in Pontiac Michigan….3rd time I’ve seen them)
I wonder if limburger cheese smells like ToeCheese under Oath.
Let this be the first of many hearings on this and related topics.
TOMMY @250
707~!!!
{{{{{{{{{Maxwell family/FDL Family}}}}}}}}}}}}
Today was quite the most fun I can remember having in donkey’s ears! That may say something about the quality of my life………nahhhhh…….
[waving to Mandrake]
Coming shortly, she was delayed by the hearings so she is beautifying the article text and we will be up soon.
Toensing was completely discredited to everyone but the freepers.
There’s plenty to bring down ms T – let’s not waste time on the 25 age vs 25 yrs ago.
I heard her say, following Waxman’s “law you drafted 30 yrs. ago” “don’t date me that much! *it* was 25.”"
There’s plenty more – and she may have to answer for some of what she said today. I love that.
Good timing for me – back to work in 20 min. Nice of the Chairman to accomodte my lunch hour – wish I could have seen the star witness, though.
Nola Sue -
Beer-thirty at the Wilson residence, too, I’d imagine.
Could we get some new sheets around here. We squeeze anymore comments in here, we’re gonna need lube to get around.
Ahhh, burnin a smoke now…the rosy nic-filled afterglow.
In her prepared testimony, toestink stuck to her new talking-point: she helped goldwater get the IIPA passed. but in her answers to questions, she spoke of drafting the law. that’s one untruth waxman wants to check, i bet.
Dear Christy!
Just turned off the telly.
WOW! WHAT.A.DAY!
And a perfect ending, with Toensing doing her “dance” alone, after Waxman put that shot right across her bow about leaving the record open [for corrections]. Gottaloveit!
And did others catch that Waxman throw-away comment at the end, that Toensing was there as a witness, because of a [demand] by the repubz?
Golly I hope they’re pleased by what she gave them, heh.
I’ve got a lotta catching up to do here, ’cause I watched faces on telly today instead of just listening. Rivetting stuff.
It seems like it would be very hard to get her for perjury. Almost everything she said was opinion. Just about the only factual statement she made was that she was a co-author of a crappy law. Maybe she cribbed it and they can get her for that.
we’re gonna need lube to get around.
Damn!
If Toestink graduated from college in 1962, that means she was born in 1940. That means she is 67 years old. Please tell me I’m not going to look like that in 16 years. It’s not that she’s got wrinkles — she’s actually not bad on that score.
It’s the obvious colorblindness.
“MSNBC just teased an upcoming segment on Val’s testimony and calls it a “bombshell” that she didn’t send her husband on that trip.”
A bombshell? Sheesh. Anybody who was paying attention has known that for years.
Sigh.
Tonight I’m playing my first completely solo show, ever. I was going to get a last little bit of practice in, but watched C-SPAN and hung with FDLers instead.
And as a result, I’m gonna go out there and kick ass.
T-Rex, please give those geniuses my fondest regards. Although it dates me, as a youngster I saw them on SNL doing “Rock Lobster” and it remains the most rocking live TV performance I’ve ever seen.
Can we now use the following line whenever she is mentioned.
Discredited Republican Operative.
-GSD
Toensing perjured herself: She lied about the statute…the statute does not require that the agent live abroad.
Here’s what the definitions section states quite explicitly:
The issue is NOT her covert status…but whether the law can be successfully prosecuted because it requires that the MOTIVES of those who expose the agent be explicated by the prosecutor. The way that TOONTSES wrote the law essentially makes it impossible to protect those who lay their lives on the line if they or their operations are exposed for politically craven purposes.
oh – I just saw the pink person behind Valerie …. that’s a guy.
Old joke, Raven. Probably even older than Toestink.
In other news: SnowBoy’s changing his Harriet Miers story.
Toensing gives lawyers a bad name.
Although it dates me, as a youngster I saw them on SNL doing “Rock Lobster” and it remains the most rocking live TV performance I’ve ever seen.
Help me, as a youngster I saw the Beatles on Ed Sullivan!
Okay, raven: you’re old and I’m jealous!
Awesome news! I’m so glad you’re back in the scene again, man. Break a leg tonight, where you playing?
Raven, you are not alone!
cinnamonape – I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, you don’t comment too often, but when you do, it is pure gold.
Tommy Yum, good luck tonight!
Back into the cave Vicky…here’s some raw meat and a few bones to chew on until we need you again.
-The Rove Directorate
Yahoo–WH backs of Miers claims.
Oh, oh. Looks like little Ms. Dreamboat might not be willing to become Irv Libby with bad make-up.
-GSD
Thanks y’all. Playing The Cave in Chapel Hill. It’s familiar, friendly ground.
(ii) who is serving outside the United States or has within the last five years SERVED outside the United States;…”
Didn’t Toestink specifically say LIVED outside the US? I’m pretty sure she did.
Come on, Icki, don’t you know what’s actually in the goddamned law?
Goldwater must have wanted to make her small enough to drown in her own bile. You just know she irritated the shit out of him.
You need help Raven – I saw the Beatles in England in August of 1963 (and BTW the following weekend saw the Stones in the same theater) now THAT’s old…
I feel sorry for Zaid. He seemed like a dweeb when he first showed up, but he seemed to know what he was talking about.
Nah, I think he was there to make one big point: that there are different standards for underlings that leak and top political appointees that leak. And he made it.
raven said:
“Help me, as a youngster I saw the Beatles on Ed Sullivan!”
You’re a baby, Raven. Now me, I saw ELVIS on Ed sullivan.
(My mom says I crawled across the floor toward the tv set while he was on. I was a girl child, btw.)
I saw the B-52s in Berkeley in, oh, 1981? 82? Great shows in those days coming through town, including Talking Heads, Mutants, Ultravox, even Eddie Money!
I suppose Davis was obligated to provide someone for FOX and LGF to quote authoritatively.
GSD you had me rolling on the floor
More info on the authoritarian personality stuff discussed in John Dean’s book – his primary source, psychologist Bob Altemeyer, has his written-for-laypersons book The Authoritarians available for free download at
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/
Snow lies:
“This is as far as we can go: we know that Karl recollects Harriet having raised it and his recollection is that he dismissed it as not a good idea,” Snow told reporters. “That’s what we know. We don’t know motivations. … I don’t think it’s safe to go any further than that.”
Rove is starting to sweat again.
Expect more Bush fuck-ups, Turdblossom is going to be busy saving his own flaccid ass once again.
-GSD
RAVEN:
I was eight when the Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan — January 1964. Sigh. Paul was soooooo cute. I think that appearance sent me into early puberty. Within a year I had boobs.
Okay, that was TMI. My excuse: I am running a fever and my heart is still pounding from watching BIG HANK tell Toestink to her face that she’s a skanky liar.
Victoria Toensing-RWLH-Right-Wing-Legal-Hack.
-GSD
tejanarusa at 293
Oh, let’s be ever-so-generous and let them claim their bombshell. I guess that’s an open admission on their part that it takes a bombshell to wake them up!
I’ve been thinking all day while glued to the testimony, that FINALLY WE get a gloriously cool Fri. newsdump. Complete with C-Span coverage of rover giving a “major address” to try to steal the cameras. So there’s fresh footage of him doing his smarmy thing, & Toensing doing hers, side by side with innocent, wronged, beautiful and articulate Valerie, and a whole bunch of House Dems I now have a whole lotta respect for.
Should be good news-watching this weekend for all us ‘crats ;->
I’m old enough to vaguely remember Ed Sullivan.
She said it in the goddamn E-MAIL, you TOOL!
And Little Miss Davis of the AP dutifully transcribes Snow’s lies without telling us that they’re lies. She’s a toolette. A moist toolette.
I put my comments in the wrong thread. Probably too late for this discussion too, but here goes…
As a former federal worker who had a SECRET clearance, I can agree with (UGH!) Toensing on one thing. IF I were disclosing classified info (after I confirmed they had the appropriate clearance AND a need to know), I would tell the person the info is classified. There is no evidence the CIA employees fulfilled this obligation. However, given the restricted discussion in the Libby trial about the status of Plame, I’m not sure there’s evidence the CIA employees didn’t fulfill that requirement, either.
let’s hear it for the firedoglake mods!
I think it was RBG (?) this morning…
You need help Raven – I saw the Beatles in England in August of 1963 (and BTW the following weekend saw the Stones in the same theater) now THAT’s old…
Saw the Stones at McCormick Place on my 16th in 65. 2120 South Michigan Ave!
Post-hearing, I briefly flipped through a couple of news channels. Sadly, the testimony was already being spun into “he-said, she-said.”
Tommy, old is in the head my brother. . .rock on.
Adie, is Rover supposed to be giving a “major address” today?
-GSD
So now the expert Libby Defense fund cheerleader Ms. Toensing has changed her talking points to nullify what the CIA head and Mrs. Plame Wilson so clearly have stated…that she was a classified covert CIA officer working in the CPD.
She is changing her claim that she was not covertover to….Mrs. Plame Wilson was not covert under definition the IIPA that she helped to write when she was 25. And she knows that based on testimony at the Libby perjury obstruction trial that strictly prohibited talking about the covert status of Mrs. Plame Wilson. Yes she says this even though she admits under oath she has no direct information and facts from the CIA and has not done and investigation herself into Mrs. Plame Wilson.
That’s just like that cardiac surgeon Doctor Bill Frist diagnosing a neurological patient Terri Schiavo based on some video tape he’s seen of her. Wow just wow….isn’t that unethical to state that so unequivocally under oath like that?
chs upstairs
Fresh thread up for the reading (and watching) for everyone.
This is how Just One Minute summed up Valerie’s testimony
New thread
Drudge running uncomplimentary pictures of Ms. Plame – with the crazy woman in pink in the background. Try as he might, even in his pictures, Val looking far, far better than Vicky.
I’ll admit I didn’t pay enough attention to the Watergate hearings at the time, and I lack the excuse of having been too young. But my immigrant grandmother, then in her late 70s, was riveted.
Here is evidence (from the New York Sun!) that contradicts Toensing’s testimony that Grenier did not warn anyone in the White House about Plame’s covert status:
http://www.nysun.com/article/47343
Another lie she absolutely told was when she was defending the White House for pushing back on Joe Wilson. She said that Wilson had claimed that VP’s office sent him to Niger. Every talking head that spouts that bit knows it’s not true. But, like Al Gore “inventing the Internet,” they just like the sound of it too much to let it go. She couldn’t resist the chance to get that one into sworn testimony before a congressional committee. Good thing Waxman’s keeping the books open.
As for the pink person, at first I thought it was Judith Guiliani, as so few people wear tiaras these days.
TRex, please tell the B-52s “hi” from me–my teenagers LOVE all their music. (Please ask them if they’re going to play Austin again any time soon. Thanks.)
Wow! What a day. Shivers down the back. Thank all of you, but especially all of us, for working so hard to see this day. Democracy at work. It’s been so long, I almost forgot what it was like.
Hey, Waccamaw!
Hope I can tape this in its entirety this eve since I’m sure they will re-broadcast but, of course, they never tell ya’ when so you have to postpone your life and leaving the house until you find out something!
Hope you had lotsa fun at the beach!
sacrablue: I’m sure there will be a transcript. It’s on tape, how can there not be one?
I did not hear VT claim that someone wrote about Plame’s identity before Novak. I did hear her make the distinction between working for the CIA (Novak, Jul 14 column) and being covert (Corn, “A White House Smear”, Jul 16 The Nation). To my mind, it’s a petty distinction, only relevant if you’re disputing that Plame was covert and you’re trying to make the case that Corn was being factually incorrect (in contrast to Novak, who was careful to use the phrase “Agency operative” rather than “covert”).
The one thing I’d like to see followed up is her claim that the CIA threatened another journalist (I heard “Winer”, but could have gotten that wrong, maybe Sanger?) with criminal prosecution if he published Plame’s name. She was claiming that the CIA was being negligent by not making the same threat to Novak. I’d really like to know what she was talking about. Likely it’s just another case of her saying something that isn’t true, but it sounds interesting.
Didn’t know the B-52s were still together, much less still living in Athens. That’s pretty cool!
not old, not old…no, no, no, I am not old, I am not…Ed Sullivan, my childhood, the Beatles, fabulous…not old, no, no…
P.S. For someone going through the tapes, that statement about the other journalist was at about 2:01pm EDT.
PLAME QUALIFIES.
PLAME QUALIFIES.
PLAME QUALIFIES.
PLAME DOES NOT QUALIFY — BUT SHE DOES NOT NEED TO, BECAUSE SHE QUALIFIES UNDER [A]. The “resides outside the US” requirement under [B] applies to a specific kind of covert agent: someone who is an agent of or informant to foreign intel services or the FBI. Section [A] requires only “service” outside the US, not residence.
Toestink has not only been exposed as a skanky liar, but a really really bad lawyer. Heh.
Can’t recall where I read the “25″ reference, so if someone else already has this, my apologies. She wasn’t saying she was 25; she was saying her work on the legislation was 25 years ago, not 30. Still, there’s plenty-nuff wrong to delight in, it seems.
I saw the Beatles live and in person – and I was already in college. Top that. Also on the bill – Bobby Hebb (”Sunny”), The Cyrkle (”Red Rubber Ball”).
AND for a couple of decades I carried a personally autographed Beatles ticket around with me in my wallet. This was pre-Ticketron days, of course – the ticket had a picture of the Beatles printed on the front, along with the price (was it $8? or $10?) And on the back, revealed to whomever I was telling this story of my golden moment with the Beatles, was the autograph of —
myself.
Man, I loved that joke. Then in the 1980s someone stole my wallet.
All things must pass. All things must pass away.
ecoop @ 323 — situation here is complicated by fact that Valerie was not just classified but NOC (non-official cover).
As in, “As always, should any memeber of your team be caught or killed, the Secretary will disavow all knowledge of your actions.”
Not as in, the formula for the rocket fuel or plans for the supersonic submarine.
Therefore, they could not even say her employment status was classified without blowing her cover.
And treating the Libby trial testimony as the sum total of the facts? Crazy! So much was restricted there in order to *not* say whether or not she was covert in order to avoid a greymail stonewall.
As a child of the Watergate era (became teenager when Watergate hit the roof) I became fascinated with politics, law and American history. I am quite aware that hardly any witness gets charged with perjury or obstruction charges when testifying falsely before eitehr house of congress, but, Ms. Toensing, with her venom and poison that she and her husband have shown since assisting the GW 2000 Presidential litigation team, may very well find herself called to the carpet by Chair Waxman if they find on the record that she has lied and/or misled the committee.
Now I do not wish anyone jail time, but, in her (and with regard to many of the Bushistas) case, I could live with that fact.
Thank God for CSPAN !!!
This is already an awesome day spent in front of the tube. The WH stiff in charge of security issues was absolutely de-balled by Dems screaming from the mountain top that we collective care about national security; we care about the value of national secrets; we care about those who are spies for this government, so WTF are you doing about it? This guy was absolutely humiliated and if he still has a nut left, he should resign. I guess he’s doing a Heck-of-a-job by never investigating anything done by BushCo, no matter what the consequences to the rest of us.
Watching Toensing reminds me of watching Condi, which makes me physically ill. I bet these two either are or could be the best of friends. If there is a MySpace in hell, they’ll be linked friends forever. I only wish everyone could see a GOPer like her on the hot seat. Talk about parsing your words and out right lying, she takes the cake. I can’t wait to hear the corrections to her public testimony.
OT
just heard
abu’s former cheif of staff kyle sampson has a new position;
in legislative section of environmental division
no kidding, they re=employed him
To 275: No “Blue Dogs”, “Yeller Dogs”
GSD 328
I have no idea what it was, but C-Span 2 was covering it, & rover was in a hall behind a podium, acting smug & all, talking about campaign tactics at the point I tuned in. He made some wisecrack about [everyoneelseintheworld] who’s [dumb as a post compared to him], & I switched back over to the Waxman hearings.
I did see rover’s coverage on C-Span 2 had the little banner -upper right corner- saying it was “live”. So I assumed it might be a desperation move to steal attention from the hearings.
Happily, he was covered in an entirely different fashion in the hearings themselves – his name brought up over & over & over again accompanied by questions about how incredulous folks were that he could still be allowed to have security clearance. HAH!
Got a big kick out of toensinged trying to blame the whole CIA for not “outing” their own agents all over the world, so-as to keep others from doing same. say whu? at least her roots were covered better than firepups’ reports from early fitzmaslibbylibbylibbyblog. gawd what an awful woman! *meow*
Trex, I hope that you have a really, really great time this evening!
In the meantime, who knew that Christmas actually came on March 16th?
-S
That was a messy bunch of Q&A, but it was also very meaty. There are sooo many questions it brings up.
What’s the punishment for violating the EO?
Was there political pressure for the Security Office to NOT investigate?
How did Toensing know about her covert status from the trial when Judge Walton insisted that issue never arise?
Who originally told Rove of her identity and NOC status?
Why was Plame a NOC who also appeared (at least) to work at a non-NOC CIA job? Weird, eh?
Can it be that the CIA was wrong in classifying Plame’s job as a covert NOC with regard to the CIIPA law?
Would THIS WH go to the extreme of getting legal opinion on whether she was covert before outing her or is this all just CYA after the fact?
How cool was that waxing Henry gave Toensing? He pretty much smashed her like a bug. And Cummings (sp) and Hodes were great. I really liked Hodes questions.
Is it possible the CIA guys who told the WH about Plame were violating the law (while doing their official duty ot inform WH officials)?
Can every stinkin’ one of ‘em be brought down for divulging classified information to nonqualified persons?
Why didn’t they bring up that after the Novak disclosure that the WH officials who knew of it’s importance had a duty to inform CIA, so they could go about trying to blunt further leaks or problems?
It’s getting curiouser and curiouser.
The more we think we know this inside and out the more we’re surprised by little things that weren’t quite what we thought.
cinnamonape says:
Toensing perjured herself: She lied about the statute…the statute does not require that the agent live abroad.
Here’s what the definitions section states quite explicitly:
Plame states that she SERVED abroad within the five year window of her exposure by the minions in the WH.
The issue is NOT her covert status…but whether the law can be successfully prosecuted because it requires that the MOTIVES of those who expose the agent be explicated by the prosecutor. The way that TOONTSES wrote the law essentially makes it impossible to protect those who lay their lives on the line if they or their operations are exposed for politically craven purposes.
Is that really grounds for perjury prosecution?
I am not questioning whether it was a lie. I thought it most odd that Toensing could claim that one had to be STATIONED abroad in the last 5 years.
Best, Terry
Mark H at 355: Can it be that the CIA was wrong in classifying Plame’s job as a covert NOC with regard to the CIIPA law? As she has said, she was LIVING her cover. That’s what cover means!
As a former federal worker who had a SECRET clearance, I can agree with (UGH!) Toensing on one thing. IF I were disclosing classified info (after I confirmed they had the appropriate clearance AND a need to know)
Ha. I had a Top Secret clearance. So there. LOL!
That could be carefully worded. One could be told before entering about the nature of the information but not necessarily by the briefer. If there was briefing material, classification is normally printed on the material.
When talking to a group, one normally knows what is expected.
I think it was a dodge.
Best, Terry
Ole Hippie Chick (#211):
Can we say “as good as” instead of “better than”?
just sayin…
What’s wrong with the Bu$h administration, why didn’t they make Toestink either Head of the CIA or the “new” Intelligence Czar?
Raven – Gotcha, unfortunately. I saw Elvis on Ed Sullivan and the cameras never strayed below his waist.
Ole hippie chick (#211)
You must be doing something wrong … ever heard of Kamasutra?
Raven, I was in college when the Beatles were on Ed Sullivan. [I.e., I’m way older than you.]
However, I’m not holding my breath waiting for “good” guests on the Sunday talkers.
Same old, slime old, I’ll bet.
CHS asks: Is it me, or is that a “correct the record, or there may be a perjury question in the offing if we find errors in your testimony?”
It’s just you – indicting expert witnesses who are expressing the same view they put forward in op-eds and court amicus briefs is not sporting.
Sorry to see the urge to stifle dissent here.