Comments on: Waxman Hearing Panel I — Part II http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:42:10 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: dmac http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-564041 dmac Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:45:48 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-564041 <p>lhp<br /> </p><blockquote>Damn,<br /> I’ve was in EPU land for long time last thread </blockquote> <p>ROFL<br /> you’re in it again, lhp</p> lhp

Damn,
I’ve was in EPU land for long time last thread

ROFL
you’re in it again, lhp

]]> By: looseheadprop http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563985 looseheadprop Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:39:09 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563985 <p>Damn,<br /> I’ve was in EPU land for long time last thread</p> Damn,
I’ve was in EPU land for long time last thread

]]> By: perris http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563972 perris Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:38:20 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563972 <blockquote><p>Perris: I’m saying that saying it turns my stomach. The Executive Order does not say what they think it says. They’re just making it up as they go along. </p> </blockquote> <p>ah, now I understand</p>

Perris: I’m saying that saying it turns my stomach. The Executive Order does not say what they think it says. They’re just making it up as they go along.

ah, now I understand

]]> By: LJ/Aquaria http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563955 LJ/Aquaria Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:36:59 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563955 <p>Norton addressing middle row of chart. (Can’t read it.) Wants to know if they have the need to know about any covert agent.</p> <p>Leonard says he doesn’t know.</p> <p>Norton: Does it depend on what they [his superiors] say? Can he think of any reason any of them would need to know?</p> <p>Leonard still doesn’t know, doesn’t know the day-to-day.</p> <p>Norton: So anybody could find out, day-to-day? OUCH</p> <p>Leonard still doesn’t know.</p> <p>Norton: Given Knodell’s testimony, you’re the fall guy.</p> Norton addressing middle row of chart. (Can’t read it.) Wants to know if they have the need to know about any covert agent.

Leonard says he doesn’t know.

Norton: Does it depend on what they [his superiors] say? Can he think of any reason any of them would need to know?

Leonard still doesn’t know, doesn’t know the day-to-day.

Norton: So anybody could find out, day-to-day? OUCH

Leonard still doesn’t know.

Norton: Given Knodell’s testimony, you’re the fall guy.

]]> By: LJ/Aquaria http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563935 LJ/Aquaria Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:33:21 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563935 <p>Had any question been raised if he needed to ask if Rove needed to keep his clearance. Will he do it? Will he get back to them? Leonard says yes. Libby does not have clearance, as of the day he resigned.</p> Had any question been raised if he needed to ask if Rove needed to keep his clearance. Will he do it? Will he get back to them? Leonard says yes. Libby does not have clearance, as of the day he resigned.

]]> By: newtonusr http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563929 newtonusr Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:32:29 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563929 <p>Hodes is a pleasant surprise.</p> Hodes is a pleasant surprise.

]]> By: TiredFed http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563926 TiredFed Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:32:16 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563926 <p>who signed off on Rove’s SF312?</p> who signed off on Rove’s SF312?

]]> By: LJ/Aquaria http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563925 LJ/Aquaria Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:32:15 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563925 <p>Now details about establishing Security Clearances. Hodes going after Rove still having a security clearance. Now hinting Rove may not be considered eligible about his right to keep it.</p> Now details about establishing Security Clearances. Hodes going after Rove still having a security clearance. Now hinting Rove may not be considered eligible about his right to keep it.

]]> By: TiredFed http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563921 TiredFed Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:31:50 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563921 <p>hahaha. candor? from Rove?</p> hahaha. candor? from Rove?

]]> By: TiredFed http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563919 TiredFed Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:31:22 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/16/waxman-hearing-panel-i-part-ii/#comment-563919 <p>haha. the 2006 ROVE SF312. should be still have one?</p> haha. the 2006 ROVE SF312. should be still have one?

]]>