
Photo from CNN article on the 25th anniversary of Nixon’s resignation.
Through six years of the Bush/Cheney regime, the American people have put up with perhaps the most lawless and dishonest behavior by any Administration in our history. We’ve seen this regime trample Constitutional principles of separation of powers, watched helplessly as it ignored statutes and Constitutional limits designed to protect individuals from government abuse and watched in horror as the regime shamelessly violated international law and standards of decency by authorizing torture, kidnapping and lawless trials and detentions. They lied about warrantless surveillance and then killed an investigation into its lawlessness and Alberto Gonzales’ involvement. The President has not fired anyone in his Administration for any of this.
So how ironic is it that one week after Cheney’s Chief of Staff is convicted for obstructing justice we are hearing calls for Attorney General Gonzales’ resignation and an investigation of the President’s Senior Political Advisor — and all because these thugs couldn’t get their stories straight about something they had a legal right to to do — replace US Attorneys at the President’s pleasure? As Pat Buchanan screamed on Scarborough, “they lied about a crime they didn’t commit!” Everyone suspects they’re covering up something worse, and that’s probably right.
The gods are surely playing with us. After all the lies this Administration has told — including lying the country into a horrific war — why has this set of lies finally captured the media’s attention in ways that may eventually lead to the regime’s collapse?
Congress put up with six years of Administration lying, six years of being treated like spineless, unprincipled rubberstamps, yet the Republican Congress shrugged it off as just so much politics. But when Gonzales and his deputies misled Congress about the reasons for firing US Attorneys, Congress suddenly became offended as though the foundations of Congressional power had been shaken.
Did this undercut Congress’ prerogatives to influence US Attorney appointments? Sure, but what about usurping the power to declare war? Or the power to determine what does or doesn’t get included in the federal budget? Or the most basic legislative power to write statutes and not have them overridden by signing statements or simply ignored, as with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the War Crimes Act or treaties ratified by Congress?
Those of us who lived through the Watergate era and watched the path to Richard Nixon’s resignation recall being equally baffled and frustrated by the illogic of what finally brought the regime down. Nixon’s Administration was offensive and lawless in many ways; Nixon and his team of Halderman, Erlichman, and Mitchell had as little regard for the Constitution as do Bush, Cheney, Rove and Gonzales. But Nixon’s most egregious offenses did not end his presidency. Nixon ordered that a special prosecutor appointed to investigate the Watergate-related crimes be fired, and when his Attorney General, Elliot Richardson, and his deputy refused, both resigned. Yet that obvious obstruction of justice by the President didn’t bring Nixon down.
Only when an obscure WH official, Alexander Butterfield, revealed a previously unknown WH taping system did we learn that there might be recordings of the President’s conversations with his closest co-conspirators. The President resisted their release, then published edited transcripts. Eventually, the Supreme Court ruled that investigators were entitled to the original tapes. The “smoking gun” conversations, showing Nixon signing off on hush money for the Watergate burglars, were there for all to see and hear. He resigned on August 9, 1974.
Will history repeat itself? Dan Froomkin’s post yesterday focused on the existence of non-official e-mail systems used by WH officials to conduct political business; these were separate from the e-mails that were automatically archived as required by law. Now these e-mails are emerging, like ghosts of Butterfield’s tapes congealing from hyperspace. Are the smoking guns for the Bush regime waiting there? The latest e-mails disclose that the WH and Gonzales misled Congress about Gonzales’ and Rove’s involvement.
I don’t know how this will end, or how soon, but I’m fairly certain we are moving towards the end. I don’t know what the tipping point will be, but I know one is coming. We’ve been here before.
So buckle up everyone, because this regime is crumbling. We know they are unprincipled; to protect the president, they will throw anyone under the bus until there’s no one left to throw. By next week it may be Gonzales. After that, it will be Rove, and eventually Cheney. This regime is going down and we’re just waiting to see how.
Update: To get ready for the Waxman hearing with Valerie Plame, check out this WaPo article. (h//t angie).
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Man I
wishhope youwereare right!Hard to believe it’s only been a week since Verdict Day. So much more stuff has hit the fan since then!
btw thanks Scarecrow, excellent post!
President Pelosi?
OldCoastie @ 4
Works for me…has a nice ring to it, too.
Good Morning from ND. 11 degrees here. Is Val on cspan this morning?
Kerry on eeeewwwww Imus.
Kerry on Imus
I think because it is a whole new fresh scandal on the Dem watch, and its proximity to the Libby conviction, and the fact that it entails possible WH obstruction with warrantless wiretapping, Abramoff, and Rove all create extra juice in this story. It does not explain the infuriating passiviity in face of all the other scandals, but as one that has new legs in front of a newly empowered Dem Congress, politically it makes sense.
Morning all — stuffy, hacking up a lung, and up and waiting for the hearing here. Committee schedule for Waxman’s committee is here. C-Span will be broadcasting the hearing — more information here. And we’ll have more on the blog in a bit, just FYI.
Morning Christy! How’s Jane?
“Nixon’s most egregious offenses”
Thank you, dear Scarecrow.
And who cares what finally brings them down? It’s the last straw. Congress knows bad stuff is happening, but they have been intimidated and threatened into submission.
Now they are regaining their power, and the very next thing the administration does, “they’re gonna get it.”
It could be that the press got pissed off at how they were being used by the Libby plot and then once it came out in testimony, it woke them up. I’d like to believe it, but it’s probably because W’s numbers are in the terlet and piling on can be fun and profitable. It sells papers and brings in viewers.
In any case, for whatever reason, I am more than ready for this house of cards to come tumbling down!
Scarecrow
thanks for putting this all together this morning
– have been so gobsmacked by all the news and all the possible leads, it’s been difficult to keep my wits
fyi – from downstairs, per Josh – the reporters who broke the Cunningham story are set to publish a book in May – wonder if publisher is in a position to speed up it’s release
picking of nits:
usuring = *usurping* the power to declare war?
back on topic – after all these Repub’s go under the bus, is the bus gonna be more in need of suspension work, or cleansing by Mayan priests?
Morning Christy,
Sorry to hear about the stuffy hacking. Had it in January and it was a bear. LOTS of hot herbal tea and chicken soup.
Had whooping cough a couple of years ago and nothing compares with that. Take care of yourself and it will pass. Stay warm and cozy.
CHristy, hope you feel better. My daughter has had a fever and horrible cough all week too. No fun!
Nixon’s downfall came from the press. This one has to be the same way. Congress, Dems and Repugs, only care about bad press.
Pelosi as President might be good, but that sure changes the 2008 race, don’t you think?
“why has this set of lies finally captured the media’s attention in ways that may eventually lead to the regime’s collapse?”
The Democratic victories in November 2006 surely played a significant role in this sea change. No matter how “loyal” many R’s claim to be to their party and its mischief-makers, they are, first and foremost, loyal to themselves.
When it became obvious at election time that the public was waking up, these “loyalists” were moved to contrition, just to survive that historic public purge.
And now, they play a constant game of brinkmanship, weighing their delusional Bush world against the realities of popular politics.
Many of them potentially facing their own investigations are hoping to “gum us” to death, at least unitl 2008, when they believe it will end, one way or another.
Hopefully, even after that election, we will still have the will to subpoena some of these time-gummers, not out of revenge or vindictiveness, but for the sake of our future democracy.
But I must admit, to be honest, I do believe we all have a distinct right to, and can expect, certain vindications; if for no other reason because the wheel of Karma is the only fair and balanced judge.
When we have spent as much precious tax money investigating Rove, Cheney and Bush as we spent going after Clinton, maybe then we will have real justice.
EPU-ed:
Must be getting into EPUzone here, but just a heads-up that Imus is doing his St. Paddy’s show in Boston. Kerry coming up soon. Russert and Kearns Goodwin already on [wfan.com Instant Replay if you want to give a listen].
Before commenting here I sent this to the Imus show:
May your shadows be behind you, and may God hold you [and Jane and Steve and Christy especially this day] in the palm of her hand. Happy St. Pat’s all. Sure and ’tis.
in a heartbeat and I wouldn’t mind for even a moment…
More Rove emails reveal other plots.
JEP @ 19. Think Niemoller.
If Congress simply allows the clock to run out on this administration it will be precisely like transferring pedophile priests. There a a thousand, Roves in the making out there, a thousand Rummies, a thousand Cheneys, a thousand Scooters.
Just as long as gone doesn’t mean forgotten.
A resignation is no replacement for a thorough investigation of ALL things and charges where warranted.
It’s a hard thing to get your head around, but many of the worst players in this administration have been not just lawyers, but judges.
It hasn’t gotten as much press, but one of the emails that made me flinch was the one from 12-19-2006 describing how they were going to keep Griffin in office, even knowing that the Senate would not want him.
First “gum it to death” asking for meet and greets, then ask for time to prove himself, then if they say, “no never” (iow – refuse as the Constitution requires as a check), about which Sampson says – the longer we can forestall the no never, the better – then:
“we can tell them we’ll look for other candidates, ask them for recommendations, evaluate the recommendations, interview their candidates, and otherwise run out the clock. All of this should be done in ‘good faith’ of course.”
But of course – quote-good faith-unquote. Does that come with one wink or two?
A separate email system?
I am getting chills just thinking about that.
Sarbanes-Oxley anyone? FOIA?
I was unemployed during the Watergate hearings and sat glued to the (b&w) television every day. I’ll probably have to take a few months leave if we ever get the chance to put this administration on the grille, just so I wouldn’t miss anything. Trying to follow the action by reading blogs just won’t cut it.
Good thing I’ve got plenty of vacation time. I can’t wait!
Super post, scarecrow! The time for justice draws nigh…
A tidbit from a just- ok article in the Post.
Go Valerie!
(bold mine)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..48_pf.html
oh, and Mary4
absolutely!
I really think it would serve the Dems [and us] better if they would frame the Abu G kerfluffle more in terms of “obstruction of justice.”
As usual, Abu et al. are trying to portray the firing of USAs as “nothing happening here, everyone does it,” and, if the comments of Charlie Gibson and others are any indication, they’re being successful.
We need to put a lot more effort into writing, in VERY LARGE LETTERS, using words of few syllables, and pictures, how the “firing” of USAs at the beginning of a new Administration is far different from weeding out members of the judiciary branch of government solely based on their “threat level” to TPTB.
I tip my hat to the prior “Oh No He Didn’t” blog, but encourage continued hard work on our part.
The damn! has burst. It’s as Plame as Day.
I do love your piece, but as one who also followed the Watergate story obsessively, I have to let you know that you have your dates wrong. SCOTUS did NOT rule on the tapes within two weeks of their becoming public. Butterfield brought that up on July 13 1973 and SCOTUS ruled on it on July 24 1974. I know because its my b’day and I’ll always remember that day.
Why is anyone even trusting this administration to turn over any possibly incriminating emails? Jeebus, people. Their damn hard drives ought to be yanked and analyzed. Office and home. Enough of this shit from these criminals.
“A shock doesn’t have to be the worst, to be the last.” From “Memory”, by Lois McMaster Bujold.
Is it wrong to hope that when these criminals in the executive branch go down, that it’ll be spectacular?
The MSM has been reluctant for too long to call a lie a lie.
Maybe this will change now.
Prairie Sunshine @ 23
I would hope many of our own conservatives would find absolution in conversion, and start promoting democracy and free enterprise instead of fascism and “monopolist capitalism.”
You ask ‘why has this set of lies finally captured the media’s attention in ways that may eventually lead to the regime’s collapse?’ I think because the fear to be fired is something that most workers (and perhaps media workers especially vunerable) have either feared or in deed experienced. Common folks, perhaps disinterested in the Plame scandal, can fully relate to this one.
Oooh, gotta love it, MSNBC segues into next hour with “Was Karl Rove…”
On Imus, Russert summarized the USAs issue as the political track and the legal track. He’s got his teeth in that one. The legal track. The shadow of obstruction of justice looms.
Faith and it’s Friday. Hearings. Accountability. Morning in America. Yum.
Friday News Dump is always so interesting, isn’t it?
Good morning, everyone. Sorry to hear Christy’s still feeling yucky. Plame day!
You can hardly blame congress for being offended by the AG’s lies to them. After all, the republicans refused to swear him in when he “testified” before them, and the Dems were forced to take his word for it. Now the Dems finally get a chance to ask some questions of the AG under oath, and he lies to them the first chance he gets!
Morning all. Coffee is your friend!
Just got this e-mail:
Happy that Tom Andrews will be on it but the Bugman?????? Richard Perle????????
OT:
Marcy and I are in the hearing room, which is mostly empty but filling with various media creatures, people with lenses and wires.
It’s raining in DC but good thing I had my Big Gay Umbrella. Marcy says she needs one, but I’m carrying her books, and my umbrella is big enough for two.
Hubba hubba!
After growing up in America under some very dissolute and nefarious administrations (Reagan, Poppy, Nixon), I was always skeptical and watchful but now I am downright mistrustful of government– all aspects of government.
I think sometimes it’s not a bad thing at all…sad, but not bad. For too long, I think we have trusted too much and focused on the short term, never thinking it could happen here.
Thank you Pach and Marcy and thank heavens for the BGU! Sweet of you to carry her books– awwwww.
Balrog the Fascist Troll @ 41
Oh man, I saw that last night. Too late to jump in to the rescue. Nice to see you have a sense of humor about it.
BruceK @ 33
Bruce! Great book, wasn’t it? I NEED more Miles!
If it’s Friday it’s Take Out the Garbage Day at the White House. Alberto Gonzales will announce his resignation late Friday afternoon, less media coverage on Friday afternoons. The cookie is indeed beginning to crumble.
Pachacutec @ 43
Great that you two are there!!!!! Wish St. Henry had Marcy on his staff to help with this.
Scarecrow at 39 — Trust me, am feeling much better today than I was earlier in the week. *g* And looking forward to Valerie’s testimony today — as well as Waxman’s opening, which I hear will be quite good.
Hey, remember when Bush said in an interview that he doesn’t use email because there would be too many things that could be used against him if he did (I believe this was the same interview in which he mentioned “the google”)? Good fucking times.
I agree with Mauimom, Dems should start referring to the Purge scandal in terms of obstruction of justice. The “pleasure of the president” line (which Jon Stewart skewered beautifully the other day, check out C & L if you have not), relies on the notion that because the president can remove USAs, nothing happened here. The key problem is not that a president can remove USAs, its why he did so and why he had to lie about it. There is no reason to lie about it unless you don’t want anyone asking questions over what is accomplished by removal of any given USA. Clearly if done to nip troublesome investigations in the bud, like Abramoff and wiretapping investigations, you are engaging in obstruction.
So there is a potential set of crimes here. Hefty crimes. Dems need to start making that point every time they talk about this, especially since the WH seems to have no spin left in its spin machine. Get out there now and set the storyline and the language of coverage and put this inane “presidential pleasuring” nonsense to rest.
It is especially important because it seems like this is a “gateway” scandal. It involves several other scandals, or should-have-been scandals, and so it allows a potentially productive avenue for Dem oversight to make inroads into the WH corruption machine.
It gives me the warm fuzzies to know that Pach and Marcy are on the scene and covering things for us. Thanks, you two! You rock!
Once again, I want to press the issue of the current US-A’s who survived the recent purge, if they are all “Bushies” then they should all resign, and let the Senate and our Senators fill the void with non-partisans, or at least people who can’t be described as “Bush Loyalists.”
Matt McCoy, Iowa’s State Senator from Des Moines, was set up in a provocative, well planned “sting” that could have beeen exacted on just about every over-achieving politician in the country, R’s or D’s or I’s.
The US-A in Iowa really pushed the envelope on this one, it may turn into a classic case of entrapment if real justice is ever enacted.
And all the while, many Iowa Republicans were clearly in cahoots with Rove and the Cheney and Bushco, providing a plethora of potential prosecutions ignored by partisan politicos.
How many other investigations like this Matt McCoy debacle are in the works? And just how loyal are these prosecutors? Are they going to continue this sheer hypocrisy, even as the house of cards falls?
The Iowa persecutions are just the tip of an iceberg? Now that we know what we know, can any charges they bring against any Democrat seem like anything but a political event, having nothing to do with real justice?
Our US-A program just got castrated. They are now legally impotent, because they are clearly exposed as partisan operatives, with a political agenda put wll ahead of their public duty to bring justice down on the guilty, and to protect the innocent.
Pach — can you blog from the hearing room?
Pach and Marcy BOTH in the house???
Yeah, baby, we got game…
Good post. Perhaps the cherry trees in Washington DC- Japanese
and all- hate being lied to.
So…what new crime will they discover ‘ol Khalid is confessin to today? Gotta distract the masses from today’s scandal. Are we takin’ bets that he wuz Anna Nicoles’ babys daddy?
PACH- Cnn’s Dana Bash said the repubs might be able to close the hearings to the public? Have you heard any rumors?
G. morning everyone. Snow in CT. I also have a hacking cough that makes me mean enough to look foreward to a good hearing. Go Val
With BushCo apparently imploding, could Scooter be contemplating a deal before it’s too late?
Christy Hardin Smith @ 49
I hope Peanut has been taking good care of her mommy! I had the crude last week so know how you feel. But today is sunshine day with the hearing we have been waiting for!
I’m with Mary4 above, believe the WH is moving towards Abu’s imminent resignation (oh right around the time Valerie is seated in the witness chair) with an eye towards shutting this all down and I pray it all goes forward
am a little worried b/c far too many of our Dems are complicit with some of the travesties committed these past six years – Patriot Act, failure to back Feingold’s Censure Resolution, repealing Church Commission regs which disclosed evidence of politically motivated spying and obstruction of first amendments rights by the FBI’s COINTELPRO division, etc.
am not at all concerned w/ Leahy or Waxman but will be interested to see if Schumer and others actually walk the walk
A big gay umbrella? What is that?
mui @ 59
We are coughing in Georgia becuase it is blooming all over!
JPL @ 58
That would be one way of demonstrating she was in fact undercover wouldn’t it?
Twisted Martini @ 63
Does it comes in assorted colors?
Twisted Martini @ 63
Blue Umbrella
Lyrics for Album: Great Days: The John Prine Anthology
Feelings are strange
especially when they come true
and I had a feeling
you’d be leaving soon
so I tried to rearrange
all my emotions
but it seems the same
no matter what I do.
Chorus:
Blue umbrella
rest upon my shoulder
hide the pain
while the rain
makes up my mind
well, my feet are wet
from thinking this thing over
and it’s been so long
since I felt the warm sunshine
just give me one good reason
and I promise I won’t ask you any more
just give me one extra season
so I can figure out the other four.
Day time
makes me wonder why you left me
night time
makes me wonder what I said
next time
are the words I’d like to plan on
but, last time
was the only thing you said.
As we get into the Spring and Summer travel season, and airline tickets get more expensive, FDL should probably plan ahead. I think it makes sense to have livebloggers (Marcy, Pach, Christy, etc) scheduled for every Friday through Independence Day.
Who knows what hearings they will be reporting on? Who cares? There’s gonna be a lot of testifying, and I wanna read about it as it happens.
Balrog the Fascist Troll @ 41
What’s that about? Let me at ‘em!
I thought it might have a picture of Liza on it. And keep in mind all the straight people without gay umbrellas are getting wet.
I think there is a good chance Gonzales is gone late this afternoon. It would be in keeping with their Friday afternoon news dump practice.
‘Friday Afternoon’ wouldn’t have been a bad caption for the elephant pic.
Loved the Bachmann expose last night. Have I told you all that she is in my district?
Sniff. I’m so proud…
A rainbow of colors.
Balrog were you flaming people last night?
Oh CRIPE and puke. Looks like Tom Delay will be a regular on the propaganda outlets for the next 20 years. And here I was, *so* hoping that all that old money in the wingnut welfare kitty had been sucked into the black hole of subprime…
Hi all. Delurking to share this marvelous day with all of you wonderful people here at the lake. Thank you all for saving our country. My to-do list is done:
Vacation day…check.
Favorites set for C-Span at Ten…..check.
Two remotes with fresh batteries….check.
Popcorn for breakfast….check.
Popcorn for lunch…..check.
Easel and flipchart to follow how Vicki Dearest will tie all this back to Bill Clinton’s penis (I like to call this the Clenis Clause)…..check.
Popcorn for supper….check.
Diet Coke…..check.
Champaign on ice….check.
And why isn’t David Schuster covering this for MSNBC? There’s some geek at the hearing building acting like he knows what he’s talking about.
Steve Pordon @ 50
I remember that. I was thinking about that last night, and remember wondering if NSA has tapes of those throw-away cell phone conversations.
Twisted Martini @ 74
He got flamed. For a very slight difference of opinion.
When it becomes crystal clear with some definitive moment or event that this administration is going down, there should be a nationwide day of spectular celebration. I’m imagining hundreds of thousands of americans dancing in the streets at the same time everywhere, joyful, ecstatic dancing.
OT –
“Semper I, General Pace” from Wednesday just got posted on HuffPo!
My thanks to the folks who suggested it to them!
angie – thanks for the WaPo link; I put it in an update in the main post. Refresh.
Mary4 — some never forget (but then others do)
raven @ 64
I will say George and E. Tenn. are hearbreakingly lovely in Spring, but the allergens. . . .
TPM has an interesting question: what was Patrick Fitzgerald’s rating on the Sampson/Rove scale? The list of attorney names and their “loyalty” rating is mute on Fitz as his name was redacted.
Is there any guess, speculation, inside knowledge?
As I pointed out in last night’s post, this issue may seem obscure and remote, but it really affects all of us. It has to do with the Rule of Law, and election fraud, etc., etc., etc. When the Executive branch of government starts using an important department like the Justice Dept. (or the IRS, as Nixon tried to use) as a club to wield at unruly opponents, or a cookie jar to offer rewards to friends, this is the very definition of Abuse of Power. Politics itself is not bad; it’s how you use it.
The Dept. of Justice is tasked with making decisions about who gets prosecuted for what crimes. They may decide to prosecute illegal immigration, or not; whether to prosecute corruption, or not; whether to prosecute phone jamming cases resulting in election fraud, or not. It has to do with how our elected officials get elected. That’s why I think this particular scandal has legs.
http://www.uclick.com/client/wpc/bs/
THis Sargent cartoon will have you rolling on the floor laughing your a** off.
oops meant Georgia
Twisted Martini @ 74
No, but I got my tail feathers singed pretty good.
Peterr @
80
Well deserved, Peterr.
Congratulations Rev Peter – that is wonderful news – a big fat deserving FDL good on ya !
Great post to read this morning, Scarecrow. Dratty is correct about the dates: “Butterfield brought that up on July 13 1973 and SCOTUS ruled on it on July 24 1974.”
I was in grade school druing the Irvin hearings – I ran home every day at lunch and 3 pm to watch the hearings. My friends thought I was nuts. But I knew it was history in the making. And sadly we are living with an even more corrupt WH administration.
I remember how long it took for Nixon to actually resign. Now I am hoping the pace will pick up for the push to oust this corrupt WH administration!
GeorgeSimian @ 18
Also affects who the first woman President would be. Funny!
Now I’m gonna have to wade through the comments from last night.
Balrog the Fascist Troll @ 87
Insufficiently anti-fascist? Happens to the best of us. Arise and troll no more. ;)
new thread
but they obviously did commit a crime, it’s called obstruction of justice, it’s shaping new law so you CAN commit crime
there is NOTHING innocent about their behavior and implying all they did was lie about a crime that was not committed is incorrect
It hasn’t happened to me yet, but I’m sure my big mouth will get get me in trouble here at some point. Don’t call me Loud Mouth Soup for nothing!
oxide @ 75
Not if people like Joe bring their A game and make his life on-camera so miserable he won’t wanna do it.
Now that we know that Rove and Co. use a secret email system, can any of you Plameologists recall any incriminating email in the Libby trial?
There was one where Rove constructed a false trail and lied about his conversation with Cooper. But were there any that were incriminating?
There are 2 issues that I think arise from this new knowledge.
1) It seems that Rove (who probably never used the official White House Email) deliberately set up the lie to be archived. Even before there was an investigation. This tells me that he was expecting to some day need to reference it.
2) Does this have an impact on the whole Fitzgerald investigation. Did Fitz ever ask if he had all relevant info. Does this void anyone’s protected status (Ari,Rove). If they were STILL misleading Fitz about their communication, could he go back and indict?
Balrog the Fascist Troll @ 86
must not have other opinions, buster. ;)
Quzi @ 90
Ah, sorry, I missed Dratty’s comment. I edited that paragraph a dozen times and lost the context for the timing along the way. But it’s right there in the timeline link. I’ll fix it. Refresh.
kalkaino @
24
And while some rats will be heading to the life preserver lockers, bolder ones will scamper to secure the vote. If we are still voting on corrupt machines in 2008, they only have to stall until than and bam, they will receive ‘a mandate from the people’ and we will be lost forever. Paper ballots, and if counted by optical scanner, rigorously audited. More here at Avi Rubin’s blog.
bwaaahaahaaa ! there was no internet, no open sourcing, no OSIS or other inter-govermental info sharing systems, and certainly no Pachacutec and Marcy in the hearing rooms
Yeah, I was reading Froomkin’s column last night. To me, the secret White House emails sounded to me like Enron’s offshore banking. I was like “WHY in the farkin blooody hell would an American company need offshore banking!?!?!”
Come to think of it, it also brings to mind the Reagan Administration’s “off-the-shelf” capability to conduct intel operations without Congress being informed.
For an example of how not to bring your A game, think “Dem strategist” Peter Fenn on MSNBC giving the Republihack’s meme of Clinton did it too in 92 a total pass….. Blergh.
Don’t these idiots do any homework at all? Don’t they prep? Don’t they practice? Don’t they study the Repubmemes…’cause they’ll keep on using the same ones as long as they’re unchallenged.
Summary question: Never mind spine, don’t these guys have any cojones?
Balrog the Fascist Troll @
41
Balgor! Good to see you, you are looking very spiffy in your fascist troll suit. Here’s a mug of Seychelles, dark roasted by me on Tuesday.
Scarecrow and FDL,
Caught up with some Wolcott the other day and he has a piece about the death of George W. S. Trow. He references Trow’s final piece in firstofthemonth. In it, Trow dissects the news media culture of Dan Rather. Given his outrage at the news media at that point, it’s hardly surprising that the age of Brit Hume can be said to have literally killed him.
Check out his final comments:
“Journalists ought to get off their over-paid Huck Finn raft.
Journalists ought to make of themselves a prideful guild. (The Newspaper Guild used to stand for a little something.)
Stand a little apart from this troubled world of ours.
Identify the stories which will affect the lives of our children.
And cover them.”
I wish he’d lived long enough to see the dawn – FDL, TPM, First Draft etc., and for fun, Tbogg – of the new medium.
As George at #18 said – we need the press in this endgame. That the new press showing up to accomplish this reflects the values that Trow laid down in his very final piece seems to me to be just right.
Marcy has a new thread. On to Waxman and Plame.
Scarecrow, I hope that we are in the endgame, and not approaching the point where what’s left of the administration demonstrates how crazy and mean they really are.
As for Congress’s unconscionable complicity in this two-term (so far) carnival of corruption and violence, you might have mapped out the distinction right here:
Congress woke up and barked about its prerogative being abused, but it was quite compliant in ceding all those powers to the overreaching executive. Why? The only possible conclusion is that the majority in Congress preferred to avoid the responsibilities that went with exercising its powers.
And look at who they ceded those powers to:
A peabrained sociopath who refused to prepare or to learn on the job
His undead vice president, whose appetite for power and money are literally boundless
A crew of comic-book intellectuals resentful at being rightly ignored by honest, rigorous thinkers
A pool of lackeys who would do anything to grab, hold, and expand power
It would have been bad enough if Congress had bent over for an executive that had some residual sense of responsibility or shame. Instead, they looked at the absolute worst executive imaginable and said OK.
Let’s hope the housecleaning continues in 2008, if we get there alive and with some democracy intact.
it’s becuase it’s been comulative, like the final straw that breaks the camels back, it accumulates
this is the reason we really have to revisit the downing street government documents, if that came out now this president would be history, no doubt about it
this is also the reason we have to revisit the sick fraternity of morons known as the PNAC, if the public finds out about those sickos now this president is hostory as well
these official government documents from downing street are a huge story but the majority of Americans don’t know it
the same is true about those sick maniacs in the pnac
we have to find a way to get corporate media to
revisit these storiesnow is the time
I think you are being far too optimistic. I think the Dems, in spite of the interesting investigations that are about to start (they better get Sibel Edmonds up as part of an investigation SOON damnit!), they will not do much with them. You see, the problem is that it will ALL fall by the wayside when Bush attacks Iran with the Democratic Congress’ blessing.
That’s right, since Pelosi very visibly removed the language from the latest Iraq funding bill that would simply require that Bush obey the restrictions of the Constitution and get Congressional approval before making moves against Iran, they are DE FACTO, giving Bush a bright green light to attack Iran. Argue the contrary all you want but that is what the Dems are doing. The press will paint it that way, the Bush Admin will clearly paint it that way, and the Dems will have no standing to deny it given their clear “intent” by removing the Iran restriction from the latest Iraq spending bill.
What do you think Bush will do if any investigation starts to get too inconvenient? What do you think he will do anyway? He WILL attack Iran as a hail mary. He will do so with or without Congressional (tacit) approval. Doing so against Congressional approval, clearly spelled out in a legal bill, would help speed up impeachment. Doing so, however, with Congressional approval (Pelosi really is giving him Congressional blessing) will essentially derail the import and usefulness of all investigations.
Tacit Congressional approval for an attack on Iran. That is the way Bush will see the removal of the Iran restrictions from the funding bill and it is the way it WILL turn out: Bush attacks Iran with Democratic blessing. The Dems will own the coming attack on Iran because they removed the restrictive language from the funding bill. The Dems will not have any moral authority at that point and will be totally irrelevant. All investigations will be back-paged as the war with Iran cranks up. The Dems will then spend the rest of the time until 2008 trying to explain how they were against the attack on Iran before they were for it. Or how they weren’t REALLY giving Bush permission to attack Iran by giving him approval.
Keep your eyes on THE ball. Don’t get all dreamy about investigations and impeachment just yet. If the Dems are FORCED (by us) to re-add the Iran restrictions to the current Iraq funding bill then any Iran attack will simply accelerate movement towards impeachment. If they allow an attack, which is what they ARE currently doing, then impeachment will be well and truly impossible.
kalkaino @
24
I fear that there are Dems (Hillary, for instance, as well as other Presidential wannabes) that want all the powers the Congress has ceded to the Executive for themselves. They are going to allow the clock to run out because they believe that they will benefit from the superpowers now claimed (and tacitly approved by Congressional cowardice) by the “Unitary President”.
Hell, perhaps they will move to have the President actually be officially titled “Unitary President”. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Unitary President of the United States!
JEP @ 53
Yes, one of the results of this has to be that The Replacement Killers must go, and we get confirmed appointments. I wonder if the legislation reversing Specter’s little loophole can mandate that.
Richard Gere was on Letterman the other night chatting up his new film The Hoax — about Clifford Irving and his fake Howard Hughes biography (the subject of Orson Welles’ greatest film F For Fake ) Gere said that in the manuscript he submitted as being by Hughes, Irving had tales of Nixon using the billionaire’s companies for money-launderign purposes. The thing is this turned out to be true — and the Watergate caper was engineered in order to find out if the Democrats had gotten wind of it!
Balrog the Fascist Troll @ 41
So when did you become a Fascist troll? Must be a story hear I don’t know about. Do tell!
Pachacutec @ 43
Great, you guys! So we’ll be treated to two government spectacles today!
Amb Wilson and Valerie arrives
first panel = valerie, then panel ;of security people to walk us thru the procedure underway when there is a security breach.
cbl @ 5:49 -
Do love that word gobsmacked; absolutely no idea why……it’s just fun.
twolf, if you’re still about -
Did you see the last speaker on WJ……. Tom Blanton from the National Security Archives? Totally impressive & *totally* capable of knocking any wing nut question out of the ballpark.
RevDeb and i are going to live blog – i took off work (i’m plotzing i’m so excited)
waccamaw – i missed it
Kathryn in MA @ 119
Don’t you just love playing hookey?
Happy Friday to all!!!
Scarecrow @ 93
I went looking, couldn’t find. What thread, or were you using another nome de blog?
I’d like to see Rove and Cheney brought down.
Neither one of them would I like to drink a beer with.
Bush, on the other hand, is a straight, brave ordinary guy; the universal Common Man which is what our republic is all about.
Just a reminder for those joining late.
The Waxman/Plame hearing is on CSPAN, and Marcy and Pach are in the hearing room.
Marcy has a new thread upstairs and will be live-blogging.
. Republicnotademocracy @ 123
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, but it does provide some plausible, if not shameful, deniability. But that alone is good enough reason to impeach Bush, just the fact he let them use his office as a hand-puppet makes him unworthy of any consolation.
And how many Common Men grow up with silver spoons coming out of every orifice? That’s part of the biggest lie in this whole story, that Bush is a “regular guy.”
And what proof do you have that he’s “straight?” Seems to me he’s offered little evidence of that, by numerous definitions.
ReneND @ 99
But, tailfeathers are *not* pinions!
cbl @ 102
Yes. We should be able to impeach at slightly slower than the speed of light.
I’ve also been pondering the question of why this particular outrage blossomed into a wildfire when so many others were summarily quenched. I think it’s because there is something so NAKED about what they were doing with these firings. They can’t “spin” it; there is nothing to “spin” it into….that is why they are having to resort to sandbox-level “he did it FIRSTs” about Clinton.
In 8 or 9 days Bush will have 666 days left in his term. anyone else worried he might start something apocolytic to ‘change the subject’?
Scarecrow, thanks for asking the right questions and coming to the right conclusion!
Did this undercut Congress’ prerogatives to influence US Attorney appointments? Sure, but what about usurping the power to declare war? Or the power to determine what does or doesn’t get included in the federal budget? Or the most basic legislative power to write statutes and not have them overridden by signing statements or simply ignored, as with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the War Crimes Act or treaties ratified by Congress?
Blessings to the FDL leaders.