<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andrea Mitchell &#8211; Drunk Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:54:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: new york lawyer</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558870</link>
		<dc:creator>new york lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558870</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;what would it take to get the Clintons to abstain from what they do? They set the bar and we got Bush. Gore and Kerry ran such incompetent campaigns and appeared so silly that  we are back to the Clintons with the continuing vapid and empty leadership or potential therefor.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what would it take to get the Clintons to abstain from what they do? They set the bar and we got Bush. Gore and Kerry ran such incompetent campaigns and appeared so silly that  we are back to the Clintons with the continuing vapid and empty leadership or potential therefor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NABNYC</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558437</link>
		<dc:creator>NABNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s strange how the media and bloggers can get so upset over a few upper middle class white people getting trashed by the Bush administration.  Bush outed Plame to punish her husband, Joe Wilson, for exposing at least one of Bush’s lies.  That was bad and wrong.  But the fact is that Wilson and Plame are upper-upper-upper class folks who do not even breathe the same air as us, who probably don’t need to work for a living, and who will make millions off the books and other appearances, maybe lawsuit, relating to this.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And now we have major media consternation about a group of Republican attorneys each making probably $200,000/year, who were canned.  The real scandal in this is that these same attorneys will likely go into private practice making even more money representations corporations intent on further decimating working people in this country and throughout the world.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t buy the argument that these attorneys were fired because they didn’t prosecute Democrats.  That was just cover.  The real reason is that Bush realized the Democrats might take control of Congress, begin hearings, multiple violations of the laws would be exposed, and they wanted to pack the top attorney seats with people who (1) would not prosecute Bush’s people and/or (2) would delay any such prosecution, or make quick deals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fitzpatrick wasn’t on the list.  But then again, he didn’t go after Rove or Cheney, or for that matter Bush.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Gonzales is now going to lose his job because he fired a few Republican attorneys?  Unbelievable.  The man who promoted torture, who told Bush that he was above all laws, will end up losing his job for firing a Republican attorney.  Pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s strange how the media and bloggers can get so upset over a few upper middle class white people getting trashed by the Bush administration.  Bush outed Plame to punish her husband, Joe Wilson, for exposing at least one of Bush’s lies.  That was bad and wrong.  But the fact is that Wilson and Plame are upper-upper-upper class folks who do not even breathe the same air as us, who probably don’t need to work for a living, and who will make millions off the books and other appearances, maybe lawsuit, relating to this.  </p>
<p>And now we have major media consternation about a group of Republican attorneys each making probably $200,000/year, who were canned.  The real scandal in this is that these same attorneys will likely go into private practice making even more money representations corporations intent on further decimating working people in this country and throughout the world.  </p>
<p>I don’t buy the argument that these attorneys were fired because they didn’t prosecute Democrats.  That was just cover.  The real reason is that Bush realized the Democrats might take control of Congress, begin hearings, multiple violations of the laws would be exposed, and they wanted to pack the top attorney seats with people who (1) would not prosecute Bush’s people and/or (2) would delay any such prosecution, or make quick deals.</p>
<p>Fitzpatrick wasn’t on the list.  But then again, he didn’t go after Rove or Cheney, or for that matter Bush.  </p>
<p>And Gonzales is now going to lose his job because he fired a few Republican attorneys?  Unbelievable.  The man who promoted torture, who told Bush that he was above all laws, will end up losing his job for firing a Republican attorney.  Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Love Jane Hamsher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558059</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Jane Hamsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557222&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bluetoe @&lt;br /&gt;
                44              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557166&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;*xyz @ 3 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m still hoping to see an FDL’er standing in the crowd outside the Today Show one morning, holding a sign that says clearly and legibly in large lettering:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dick Cheney controls Tim Russert&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EXXXCCCCEEEELLLLENT!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even better, remember the Lieberman kiss float?  Can someone photoshop Shooter &amp; Timmeh!! kissing and use that?  Instead of the sign.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-557222"><em>Bluetoe @<br />
                44              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-557166"><em>*xyz @ 3 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’m still hoping to see an FDL’er standing in the crowd outside the Today Show one morning, holding a sign that says clearly and legibly in large lettering:</p>
<p><b>Dick Cheney controls Tim Russert</b></p>
</blockquote>
<p>EXXXCCCCEEEELLLLENT!!!!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even better, remember the Lieberman kiss float?  Can someone photoshop Shooter &amp; Timmeh!! kissing and use that?  Instead of the sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Love Jane Hamsher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558052</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Jane Hamsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557255&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;GSD @&lt;br /&gt;
                74              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Someone must have scrubbed the references to John Fund(ament) beating his girlfriend on Wikipedia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I did find out that he was whoring the voter fraud scam prior to the 2004 elections:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fund authored a book, &lt;b&gt;Stealing Elections:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;How Voter Fraud Threatens Our&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Democracy&lt;/b&gt; (Encounter Books, 2004, ISBN 1-59403-061-8) about the U.S. system, which he describes as “a haphazard, fraud-prone election system befitting an emerging Third World country rather than the world’s leading democracy”.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier, Fund co-authored Cleaning House: America’s Campaign for Term Limits (Regnery Gateway, 1992, ISBN 0-89526-516-8) with James Coyne. Some left-wing commentators claim that Rush Limbaugh’s book, The Way Things Ought To Be, was ghostwritten by Fund.[1]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looks like he has been a vanguard for pushing rightwing electioneering scams for quite some time. Notice the term-limits book too. Notice how few calls for term limits there were when this Republican congress had gained majority status.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-GSD&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is Fund friends w/ Dan Gerstein?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-557255"><em>GSD @<br />
                74              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Someone must have scrubbed the references to John Fund(ament) beating his girlfriend on Wikipedia.</p>
<p>But I did find out that he was whoring the voter fraud scam prior to the 2004 elections:</p>
<p><em>Fund authored a book, <b>Stealing Elections:</b> <b>How Voter Fraud Threatens Our</b> <b>Democracy</b> (Encounter Books, 2004, ISBN 1-59403-061-8) about the U.S. system, which he describes as “a haphazard, fraud-prone election system befitting an emerging Third World country rather than the world’s leading democracy”.</em></p>
<p>Earlier, Fund co-authored Cleaning House: America’s Campaign for Term Limits (Regnery Gateway, 1992, ISBN 0-89526-516-8) with James Coyne. Some left-wing commentators claim that Rush Limbaugh’s book, The Way Things Ought To Be, was ghostwritten by Fund.[1]</p>
<p>Looks like he has been a vanguard for pushing rightwing electioneering scams for quite some time. Notice the term-limits book too. Notice how few calls for term limits there were when this Republican congress had gained majority status.</p>
<p>-GSD</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is Fund friends w/ Dan Gerstein?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Love Jane Hamsher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558046</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Jane Hamsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558046</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557290&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Elliott @&lt;br /&gt;
                88              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557283&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @ 85&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patrick Leahy on the NewsHour talking about the attorney scandal.  All 9 Republicans on the Judiciary Committee were asked to appear.  None accepted.  Arlen is hiding out it seems.  I wonder why.  Could it be that he didn’t want to answer any questions about how US attorneys could be replaced without Senate confirmation originated in his office?  Cuz usually Arlen loves himself some TV time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want him under oath on this&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specter better retire in ‘10, or else he’ll get the Conrad Burns treatment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-557290"><em>Elliott @<br />
                88              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-557283"><em>Hugh @ 85</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Patrick Leahy on the NewsHour talking about the attorney scandal.  All 9 Republicans on the Judiciary Committee were asked to appear.  None accepted.  Arlen is hiding out it seems.  I wonder why.  Could it be that he didn’t want to answer any questions about how US attorneys could be replaced without Senate confirmation originated in his office?  Cuz usually Arlen loves himself some TV time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I want him under oath on this</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Specter better retire in ‘10, or else he’ll get the Conrad Burns treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Love Jane Hamsher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558041</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Jane Hamsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 05:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-558041</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557207&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;egregious @&lt;br /&gt;
                33              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557202&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;punaise @ 29 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-557199&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;hackworth @ 26&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What if you had to look at Allan Greenspan’s face first thing on any given morning. 
&lt;p&gt;————-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;imagine having to deal with his &lt;em&gt;irrational exuberance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh sheez, not their sex life again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, we can always talk about Greenspan and Ayn Rand.    ;-)  Supposedly he was the bottom in that relationship.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-557207"><em>egregious @<br />
                33              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><blockquote><a href="#comment-557202"><em>punaise @ 29 </em></a><br />
<a href="#comment-557199"><em>hackworth @ 26</em></a><br />
What if you had to look at Allan Greenspan’s face first thing on any given morning. </p>
<p>————-</p>
<p>imagine having to deal with his <em>irrational exuberance<br />
</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh sheez, not their sex life again.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, we can always talk about Greenspan and Ayn Rand.    ;-)  Supposedly he was the bottom in that relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Watts</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557947</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 05:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557947</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ms. Mitchell’s conversation with Don Imus was painful, like listening to someone who had taken a lot of bad acid trying to explain to their parents why the walls of the living were covered with ketchup and she was hanging naked from the chandelier eating a bar of soap.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Mitchell’s conversation with Don Imus was painful, like listening to someone who had taken a lot of bad acid trying to explain to their parents why the walls of the living were covered with ketchup and she was hanging naked from the chandelier eating a bar of soap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Johnson</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557925</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557925</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jane,&lt;br /&gt;
You inspired me and I posted a piece at Noquarter expanding on Andrea as the Intoxicated Ass Pimple.  Terrific piece (yours, not mine)!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane,<br />
You inspired me and I posted a piece at Noquarter expanding on Andrea as the Intoxicated Ass Pimple.  Terrific piece (yours, not mine)!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elwood Fortune</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557687</link>
		<dc:creator>Elwood Fortune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557687</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shuster!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shuster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliffradz</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557623</link>
		<dc:creator>cliffradz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/03/13/andrea-mitchell-drunk-again/#comment-557623</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s stop calling this guy “Scooter” please. I once read Triumph of Justice by Dan Petrocelli, lead lawyer in the OJ Simpson civil trial (in which Simpson was found liable for the effects of his crimes). Petrocelli and his team refused to call him “OJ” because they’d already seen enough sycophantism for the sports hero OJ: “Hey OJ, Hey Juice, how about signing this football for my kid?” Petrocelli realized this guy needed to be referred to as what he was: an indicted violent criminal. Any sports-hero familiarity was psychologically counterproductive to the case against Simpson. So, throughout the civil trial, that’s how they referred to him, just like any other violent criminal: “Simpson.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similarly, Irving Lewis Libby, convicted felon, needs to be referred to as such. If some jurors want to cry at seeing Poor Widdle Scooter sent off to prison, they know nothing about this man. This neocon, PNAC, Cheney’s Cheney, liar, perjurer, obstructor of justice, character assassin, treasonous, hardcore SOB. We who read and write on this site (I may post this on kos too) should know better: his name is Libby. No more Scooter please.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s stop calling this guy “Scooter” please. I once read Triumph of Justice by Dan Petrocelli, lead lawyer in the OJ Simpson civil trial (in which Simpson was found liable for the effects of his crimes). Petrocelli and his team refused to call him “OJ” because they’d already seen enough sycophantism for the sports hero OJ: “Hey OJ, Hey Juice, how about signing this football for my kid?” Petrocelli realized this guy needed to be referred to as what he was: an indicted violent criminal. Any sports-hero familiarity was psychologically counterproductive to the case against Simpson. So, throughout the civil trial, that’s how they referred to him, just like any other violent criminal: “Simpson.” </p>
<p>Similarly, Irving Lewis Libby, convicted felon, needs to be referred to as such. If some jurors want to cry at seeing Poor Widdle Scooter sent off to prison, they know nothing about this man. This neocon, PNAC, Cheney’s Cheney, liar, perjurer, obstructor of justice, character assassin, treasonous, hardcore SOB. We who read and write on this site (I may post this on kos too) should know better: his name is Libby. No more Scooter please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
