<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scooter Awards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:05:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;test123hehe&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test123hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinnamonape</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521716</link>
		<dc:creator>cinnamonape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521716</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My take on the long deliberations is that the jury has pretty much rejected the Memory Defense aspect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If they believed that Libby “simply forgot” because people forget things…well that could have been resolved in a day at most. If there was a single holdout on that element they would have come back quickly and declared a mistrial on all counts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then they have asked for the flip chart, post-its and tape.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What that indicates is that they are now examining the interacting web of witnesses and how these mebellish and support the charges on each count.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looks as if they are going thrown Fitz’s logic and will likely find it persuasive on all counts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember that once the “Memory Defense” is rejected, Fitz only need to show that a single witness for each count has credibility. He only needs one “he said” to overwhelm Libby’s GJ statements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even worse, once they find Libby guilty on ONE count…they will view him as a liar and perjurer…and that will increase the valence of the testimony on those counts where other witnesesses may have had minor credibility issues. ONE certain lie and Libby will be viewed as a probable liar for the remaining counts. It will be a cascade.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on the long deliberations is that the jury has pretty much rejected the Memory Defense aspect.</p>
<p>If they believed that Libby “simply forgot” because people forget things…well that could have been resolved in a day at most. If there was a single holdout on that element they would have come back quickly and declared a mistrial on all counts.</p>
<p>Then they have asked for the flip chart, post-its and tape.</p>
<p>What that indicates is that they are now examining the interacting web of witnesses and how these mebellish and support the charges on each count.</p>
<p>It looks as if they are going thrown Fitz’s logic and will likely find it persuasive on all counts.</p>
<p>Remember that once the “Memory Defense” is rejected, Fitz only need to show that a single witness for each count has credibility. He only needs one “he said” to overwhelm Libby’s GJ statements.</p>
<p>Even worse, once they find Libby guilty on ONE count…they will view him as a liar and perjurer…and that will increase the valence of the testimony on those counts where other witnesesses may have had minor credibility issues. ONE certain lie and Libby will be viewed as a probable liar for the remaining counts. It will be a cascade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nolo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521366</link>
		<dc:creator>nolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521366</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-520996&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;chris @ 71 &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;. . .The trial pulled away the curtain &lt;b&gt;but the main stream news seemed to have turned away&lt;/b&gt;. [ed.– emphasis supplied.] Is it fear? modesty? stupidity?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;. . .Is there a Cheney vs the whole rest of the world story happening and no one is talking about it? Has the cat got everyone’s tongue?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Scooter is found guilty, do you think there will be calls for Dick’s resignation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hey chris –&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;first, while i hear you, and i do think&lt;br /&gt;
shooter looks to be out-of-step with just&lt;br /&gt;
about every other cabinet member, &lt;b&gt;i DO&lt;/b&gt; think&lt;br /&gt;
that the fact that the old-guard, solid-&lt;br /&gt;
right-capitalists’-newspaper-of-record&lt;br /&gt;
is taking note is, well, pretty strong&lt;br /&gt;
evidence that mr. cheney’s days as v.p.&lt;br /&gt;
are numbered.  [didja’ see friday’s wall&lt;br /&gt;
street journal?]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i posted something similar to the&lt;br /&gt;
below over in the most-recent libby trial&lt;br /&gt;
thread on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkleft.comw&quot;&gt;talkleft.com&lt;/a&gt;, and at&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://indictdickcheney.blogspot.com/2007/02/senate-committee-to-renew-hearings-on.html&quot;&gt;my little corner of the world&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
[shameless plug!]&lt;br /&gt;
but i do think the m.s.m. is slowly taking&lt;br /&gt;
its carefully-measured shot at this story.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is clear that no one in the m.s.m. wants&lt;br /&gt;
to be “out in front” on it, should cheney pull&lt;br /&gt;
a now-improbable-frankenstein’s-monster-&lt;br /&gt;
reanimation-process out of his hip pocket,&lt;br /&gt;
but look at the journal’s latest:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;in fact, yesterday, the wall street&lt;br /&gt;
journal began to acknowlege that even&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;if&lt;/strong&gt; scooter is acquitted, this debacle&lt;br /&gt;
may end in sam-ervin-style hearings — with&lt;br /&gt;
the vice president of the united states&lt;br /&gt;
being called to explain himself. the senate&lt;br /&gt;
armed services committee has openly&lt;br /&gt;
asked for &lt;strong&gt;renewed&lt;/strong&gt; hearings — and the&lt;br /&gt;
appearance of one scooter libby, at them:&lt;br /&gt;
quoth the wall street journal:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;“.. .Already, the Senate Intelligence Committee&lt;br /&gt;
has requested documents and interview transcripts&lt;br /&gt;
from the Inspector General’s office, while the&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Armed Services Committee seeks further&lt;br /&gt;
interviews with Mr. Libby, the former chief&lt;br /&gt;
of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney. . .”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;now, once the trial is over, either way — up&lt;br /&gt;
or down — scooter will have a-far-more-limited&lt;br /&gt;
fifth amendment privilege to assert, as a shield,&lt;br /&gt;
before congress. his fifth amendment rights&lt;br /&gt;
will arguably attach &lt;b&gt;only&lt;/b&gt; to statements that&lt;br /&gt;
might constitute evidence of &lt;b&gt;new&lt;/b&gt; crimes,&lt;br /&gt;
crimes for which he &lt;b&gt;hasn’t yet&lt;/b&gt; been tried.&lt;br /&gt;
and that may prove very dicey for his old boss,&lt;br /&gt;
dick cheney — either scooter will be a convicted&lt;br /&gt;
felon (and likely working his way through the&lt;br /&gt;
appellate process — all while looking to cut deals&lt;br /&gt;
for favorable sentencing recommendations from the&lt;br /&gt;
the office of special counsel — patrick fitzgerald),&lt;br /&gt;
or he’ll be acquitted, and the special counsel&lt;br /&gt;
won’t be able to re-try him, under the one of the&lt;br /&gt;
other main protective provisions of the fifth&lt;br /&gt;
amendment, the “double jeopardy” clause. . .&lt;br /&gt;
either way, he could face &lt;b&gt;contempt of congress&lt;br /&gt;
charges, and ultimately, jail&lt;/b&gt;, if he doesn’t&lt;br /&gt;
cooperate, at least as to unprivileged matters.&lt;br /&gt;
so, dick, if your people are reading this — do&lt;br /&gt;
the honorable thing, before your &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/agnew.htm&quot;&gt;spiro agnew&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
moment&lt;/i&gt; arrives, front and center,&lt;br /&gt;
in the committee chambers of the&lt;br /&gt;
armed services committe of the united states senate. . .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://indictdickcheney.blogspot.com/2007/02/senate-committee-to-renew-hearings-on.html&quot;&gt;more here&lt;/a&gt;. . . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-520996"><em>chris @ 71 </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>. . .The trial pulled away the curtain <b>but the main stream news seemed to have turned away</b>. [ed.– emphasis supplied.] Is it fear? modesty? stupidity?</p>
<p>. . .Is there a Cheney vs the whole rest of the world story happening and no one is talking about it? Has the cat got everyone’s tongue?  </p>
<p>If Scooter is found guilty, do you think there will be calls for Dick’s resignation?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>hey chris –</p>
<p>first, while i hear you, and i do think<br />
shooter looks to be out-of-step with just<br />
about every other cabinet member, <b>i DO</b> think<br />
that the fact that the old-guard, solid-<br />
right-capitalists’-newspaper-of-record<br />
is taking note is, well, pretty strong<br />
evidence that mr. cheney’s days as v.p.<br />
are numbered.  [didja’ see friday’s wall<br />
street journal?]</p>
<p>i posted something similar to the<br />
below over in the most-recent libby trial<br />
thread on <a href="http://www.talkleft.comw">talkleft.com</a>, and at<br />
<a href="http://indictdickcheney.blogspot.com/2007/02/senate-committee-to-renew-hearings-on.html">my little corner of the world</a>,<br />
[shameless plug!]<br />
but i do think the m.s.m. is slowly taking<br />
its carefully-measured shot at this story.</p>
<p>it is clear that no one in the m.s.m. wants<br />
to be “out in front” on it, should cheney pull<br />
a now-improbable-frankenstein’s-monster-<br />
reanimation-process out of his hip pocket,<br />
but look at the journal’s latest:</p>
<p>in fact, yesterday, the wall street<br />
journal began to acknowlege that even<br />
<strong>if</strong> scooter is acquitted, this debacle<br />
may end in sam-ervin-style hearings — with<br />
the vice president of the united states<br />
being called to explain himself. the senate<br />
armed services committee has openly<br />
asked for <strong>renewed</strong> hearings — and the<br />
appearance of one scooter libby, at them:<br />
quoth the wall street journal:</p>
<blockquote><p>“.. .Already, the Senate Intelligence Committee<br />
has requested documents and interview transcripts<br />
from the Inspector General’s office, while the<br />
Senate Armed Services Committee seeks further<br />
interviews with Mr. Libby, the former chief<br />
of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney. . .”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>now, once the trial is over, either way — up<br />
or down — scooter will have a-far-more-limited<br />
fifth amendment privilege to assert, as a shield,<br />
before congress. his fifth amendment rights<br />
will arguably attach <b>only</b> to statements that<br />
might constitute evidence of <b>new</b> crimes,<br />
crimes for which he <b>hasn’t yet</b> been tried.<br />
and that may prove very dicey for his old boss,<br />
dick cheney — either scooter will be a convicted<br />
felon (and likely working his way through the<br />
appellate process — all while looking to cut deals<br />
for favorable sentencing recommendations from the<br />
the office of special counsel — patrick fitzgerald),<br />
or he’ll be acquitted, and the special counsel<br />
won’t be able to re-try him, under the one of the<br />
other main protective provisions of the fifth<br />
amendment, the “double jeopardy” clause. . .<br />
either way, he could face <b>contempt of congress<br />
charges, and ultimately, jail</b>, if he doesn’t<br />
cooperate, at least as to unprivileged matters.<br />
so, dick, if your people are reading this — do<br />
the honorable thing, before your <i><a href="http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/agnew.htm">spiro agnew</a><br />
moment</i> arrives, front and center,<br />
in the committee chambers of the<br />
armed services committe of the united states senate. . .</p>
<p><a href="http://indictdickcheney.blogspot.com/2007/02/senate-committee-to-renew-hearings-on.html">more here</a>. . . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairfax</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521363</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairfax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Emperical evidence proves that Mr Fitzgerald is the “real-deal”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If he weren’t, he’d have been SWIFTBOAT chum by now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emperical evidence proves that Mr Fitzgerald is the “real-deal”.</p>
<p>If he weren’t, he’d have been SWIFTBOAT chum by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521130</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 05:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-521054&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;S.O.S. in MA @&lt;br /&gt;
                105              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-520996&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;chris @ 70&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;… If Scooter is found guilty, do you think there will be calls for Dick’s resignation?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One can only hope.  I say &lt;b&gt;YES&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
…….&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Articles of Impeachment do not result from these High Crimes and Misdemeanors, I am not sure whether a future President directly ordering a nuclear strike on Chicago would draw charges from a future Congress, if indeed our Congress continues to exist.  What do &lt;em&gt;YOU&lt;/em&gt; think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheney also ought to be impeached for his role in orchestrating false intelligence re Iraq. It was Cheney who met with Chalabi and the other ex-patriate Iraquis. It was Cheney and Rummy who demanded intelligence to fit their plans. And I think  Cheney had a hand in stovepiping false intelligence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Valerie Plame affair was a threat - a way to silence anyone who even thought about coming forward and whistleblowing.  Cheney was willing to destroy anyone in the CIA  any of their trusted contacts. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the “who sent Joe Wilson” noise was really a diversion to keep the press from asking “who forged the documents that purported to show Sadaam wanted to buy yellowcake”. And it seemed to work. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheney should resign. Congressfolk should be asking him to resign. And if he won’t. He ought to be impeached. I am willing to add my name to any petition requesting his resignation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If our democracy survives this, we need to change how the OVP functions. No one should be running a parallel government in a democracy- and most certainly no one should be running an evil, clandestine parallel government in a democracy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-521054"><em>S.O.S. in MA @<br />
                105              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-520996"><em>chris @ 70</em> </a>
</p>
<blockquote><p>… If Scooter is found guilty, do you think there will be calls for Dick’s resignation?</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>One can only hope.  I say <b>YES</b>.<br />
…….</p>
<p>If Articles of Impeachment do not result from these High Crimes and Misdemeanors, I am not sure whether a future President directly ordering a nuclear strike on Chicago would draw charges from a future Congress, if indeed our Congress continues to exist.  What do <em>YOU</em> think?</p>
<p>Cheney also ought to be impeached for his role in orchestrating false intelligence re Iraq. It was Cheney who met with Chalabi and the other ex-patriate Iraquis. It was Cheney and Rummy who demanded intelligence to fit their plans. And I think  Cheney had a hand in stovepiping false intelligence.</p>
<p>The Valerie Plame affair was a threat &#8211; a way to silence anyone who even thought about coming forward and whistleblowing.  Cheney was willing to destroy anyone in the CIA  any of their trusted contacts. </p>
<p>I think the “who sent Joe Wilson” noise was really a diversion to keep the press from asking “who forged the documents that purported to show Sadaam wanted to buy yellowcake”. And it seemed to work. </p>
<p>Cheney should resign. Congressfolk should be asking him to resign. And if he won’t. He ought to be impeached. I am willing to add my name to any petition requesting his resignation. </p>
<p>If our democracy survives this, we need to change how the OVP functions. No one should be running a parallel government in a democracy- and most certainly no one should be running an evil, clandestine parallel government in a democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Love Jane Hamsher</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521107</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Jane Hamsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521107</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-521004&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;jim preston @&lt;br /&gt;
                78              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why isn’t the first comment on each thread a call for VP Cheney to resign?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fire Dead Eye Dick!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-521004"><em>jim preston @<br />
                78              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Why isn’t the first comment on each thread a call for VP Cheney to resign?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Fire Dead Eye Dick!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521099</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John Casper — bravo et touche.  Think Marcy is rubbing off on us, citing verse and chapter like that, eh? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Casper — bravo et touche.  Think Marcy is rubbing off on us, citing verse and chapter like that, eh? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Casper</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521061</link>
		<dc:creator>John Casper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521061</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;“journalists were forced to reveal anonymous sources”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As usual, Lil Debbie Howell got it wrong. From emptywheel’s AOD, page 78:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Fitzgerald realized he was doing something momentous. Journalists consider their sources and their conversations with them to be sacrsanct. So he approached the issue cautiously. &lt;b&gt;He didn’t ask them to reveal their sources;&lt;/b&gt; rather, he figured out who the sources were using phone records and other documents turned over by the administration. Then he approached journalists with waivers from their sources, asking only for a description of what had transpired within the conversations.”
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bold is mine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“journalists were forced to reveal anonymous sources”</em></p>
<p>As usual, Lil Debbie Howell got it wrong. From emptywheel’s AOD, page 78:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Fitzgerald realized he was doing something momentous. Journalists consider their sources and their conversations with them to be sacrsanct. So he approached the issue cautiously. <b>He didn’t ask them to reveal their sources;</b> rather, he figured out who the sources were using phone records and other documents turned over by the administration. Then he approached journalists with waivers from their sources, asking only for a description of what had transpired within the conversations.”
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bold is mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NZ Expat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521055</link>
		<dc:creator>NZ Expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I liked the comment that someone made that there was a contrast between Libby’s obsessive note-taking and penchant for detail at the trial and his claim that he couldn’t pay attention to all the details.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the comment that someone made that there was a contrast between Libby’s obsessive note-taking and penchant for detail at the trial and his claim that he couldn’t pay attention to all the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.O.S. in MA</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521054</link>
		<dc:creator>S.O.S. in MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/24/the-scooter-awards/#comment-521054</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-520996&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;chris @ 70&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;… If Scooter is found guilty, do you think there will be calls for Dick’s resignation?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One can only hope.  I say &lt;b&gt;YES&lt;/b&gt;.  And once he’s gone, Fitz and/or the Congress can go after the pReznit as having orchestrated the whole thing. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;==&gt; First count:  carelessly “declassifying” and then “selectively leaking” the weakest parts of the NIE to buttress their false claim in the SotU.  This may well have been illegal on its face, and the Nixon defense “If the President does it, that means it is not illegal” is the purest bullpuckey.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;==&gt;  Second count:  TREASONously outing a covert CIA agent for purely political purposes (silencing a brave whistleblower, her husband), thus intentionally terminating her career.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;==&gt; Third count:  TREASONously exposing Brewster Jennings, both as a “death threat” against any in the Intel Community who might be contemplating going up against the administration on the war, and as a means of destroying the CIA’s eyes and ears on nuclear WMD in the middle east.  This caused documented killings of Brewster Jennings operatives and contacts in foreign lands.  Under cover of that death threat and that Intel blindness, the administration furthered their treasonous plans to lie the nation into an illegal war.  It bears noting that that war has bankrupted the country, destroyed our diplomatic and moral authority in the world, not to mention killing thousands of Americans and Iraquis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Articles of Impeachment do not result from these High Crimes and Misdemeanors, I am not sure whether a future President directly ordering a nuclear strike on Chicago would draw charges from a future Congress, if indeed our Congress continues to exist.  What do &lt;em&gt;YOU&lt;/em&gt; think?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-520996"><em>chris @ 70</em> </a>
</p>
<blockquote><p>… If Scooter is found guilty, do you think there will be calls for Dick’s resignation?</p></blockquote>
<p>One can only hope.  I say <b>YES</b>.  And once he’s gone, Fitz and/or the Congress can go after the pReznit as having orchestrated the whole thing. </p>
<p>==&gt; First count:  carelessly “declassifying” and then “selectively leaking” the weakest parts of the NIE to buttress their false claim in the SotU.  This may well have been illegal on its face, and the Nixon defense “If the President does it, that means it is not illegal” is the purest bullpuckey.</p>
<p>==&gt;  Second count:  TREASONously outing a covert CIA agent for purely political purposes (silencing a brave whistleblower, her husband), thus intentionally terminating her career.</p>
<p>==&gt; Third count:  TREASONously exposing Brewster Jennings, both as a “death threat” against any in the Intel Community who might be contemplating going up against the administration on the war, and as a means of destroying the CIA’s eyes and ears on nuclear WMD in the middle east.  This caused documented killings of Brewster Jennings operatives and contacts in foreign lands.  Under cover of that death threat and that Intel blindness, the administration furthered their treasonous plans to lie the nation into an illegal war.  It bears noting that that war has bankrupted the country, destroyed our diplomatic and moral authority in the world, not to mention killing thousands of Americans and Iraquis.</p>
<p>If Articles of Impeachment do not result from these High Crimes and Misdemeanors, I am not sure whether a future President directly ordering a nuclear strike on Chicago would draw charges from a future Congress, if indeed our Congress continues to exist.  What do <em>YOU</em> think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
