Thanks for your work on this amazing (and amazingly busy) day.

When you have a moment, I’ve a comment in custody (or the toobz ate it).

If y’all could spring it (it was a follow-on to 97) that would be great.

Thanks!

[Mod Note; sorry Kirk, it wasn’t us. The toobz must have eaten it.]

Well’s apparently thinks that he had a Perry Mason moment! But no one else can remember it!

Oh yeah…it was about the possibility that Cooper meant to type up an alibi for Libby when, in fact, the note was indecipherable! As I recall, in that “Perry Mason moment” Jeffress then got Cooper to break down in tears and admit that he actually did mean to type that Libby told him that Libby was simply passing on a rumor made to him by reporters…

Yeah I recall that…but I “musta been drinking!”

Is there such a thing anymore as an “anonymous e-mail”?

Of course, if you know your way around the MIME protocol. Give me an address and I’ll send you an email that you would swear originated in Timbuktu. If you were clever enough to track back to the original Post Office Protocol server, you would find the original sender did not exist. This is the nature of spam email but, if I were a modern Deepthroat, I might find a way to let the intrepid blogger who I was leaking to know that an anonymous email was coming. And perhaps I’d encode it with a free, Public Key Cryptosystem RSA algorithm like PGP just to keep prying eyes from seeing it easily.

It is interesting to think on the irony that modern electronic cryptography can be used to protect the journalist/blogger from having to reveal sources by protecting the content of the source’s information. In a sense, by using cryptography, a source would be protecting their journalist.

Again, the old world is dead.

Except for Russert testifying that if Mitchell or Gregory had known, then he would have known.

“Evidence” maybe not, but reasonable doubt???

Now look, it goes on for four pages, the reason I put it there is because it’s not easy, to go under GJ testimony. He didn’t get the basic facts wrong, he had a clear memory, which witness came here that didn’t get something wrong? What witness?

I’m confused as to why Jeffries would say that Scooter has a “clear memory” when they spent so much time previously talking about how fuzzy his memory can be.

Jeffress. The most improtant thing I have to say to you. THe govt asks you to find that Libby lied, that’ll mean the loss of his freedom.

You must not convict because he’ll then be punished?

Right. As we say at the gym, “don’t bring that weak shit into my house.”
_

It’s the Puppy Dog Eyes Defense!

Now I’ve got a vision of Puss in Boots from Shrek making the Biiigggg Saaaaddd Eyyyyyeeeszz. Awwww, how cuuuuute!