The courtroom was packed today and the theatrics did not disappoint. Patrick Fitzgerald came right out and said that Shooter had his dirty fingerprints all over the crime. As Marcy noted in the liveblog:
There is a cloud over the VP. He wrote those columns, he had those meetings, He sent Libby off to the meeting with Judy. Where Plame was discussed. That cloud remains because the defendant obstructed justice. That cloud was there. That cloud is something that we just can't pretend isn't there.
I recognize that my view is probably somewhat biased in favor of the prosecution, but really I don't see how anyone could have watched the proceedings today and come away with the conclusion that the defense was anything other than a chaotic mess. Marcy and I agreed that Wells sounded like he was a used car salesman trying to fob off a junker he had no faith in, and for my part I'm guessing that much of the defense was crafted by Scooter Libby calling up in the middle of the night and helpfully saying, "make sure you say this tomorrow, Ted."
At the end of his closing statements, Wells broke down in tears and begged the jury to "give Scooter back to me" (or something just as weird to that effect). He then returned to the defense table, head in hand, never to look up again. Some thought it was over-identification with the defendant, but I thought he was grieving his career — this would be a big loss for him. He ate up 20 minutes of Scooter's precious time rebutting things that Zeidenberg had said about himself during the prosecution's closing statements, as if that mattered, and then left himself with little time to cover all the points he had left. In the end he was reading methodically from his own Power Point presentation. It all came off a bit unglued.
Everyone was punching each other to keep from falling asleep when Fitzgerald took to the floor and treated all to a bit of Shakespearean theatrics, yelling "madness, madness!" He was lacerating and precise, speaking so quickly that the court reporter couldn't catch up. His command of the material was a bit daunting, able to recall voluminous evidenciary document numbers simply by looking at some chart in his own brain. He wandered off into the weeds for a bit (demonstrating an eriposte-like knowledge of the history of the Niger uranium claims) before retreating to simpler ground for his closing. All the while, Wells never looked up at him, even as Jeffress was nervously rubbing his moustach and shifting in his chair.
At one point Fitzgerald started down a road I thought he wouldn't — mentioning that Libby would most surely remember information regarding Valerie Plame because anyone would when there were lives at stake, identities that might be exposed. I expected Wells to leap out of his chair but he never took his head out of his hand, and Jeffres looked like he was about to have a conniption fit. As the second attorney on the case it wasn't his place to object, but even if Fitzgerald was on completely solid ground based on arguments that they themselves had opened up, at the very least they needed to stop his momentum. He had the jury in his hand at that moment and Wells was in a coma, so Jeffress timidly asked if they could approach the bench. Which Fitz did, but Wells did not. Fitz wound up backtracking a bit, emphasising that this went to Libby's state of mind and should not be considered a discussion of whether Libby leaked classified information because that's not what he was charged with. But during the chat with the judge, Libby leaned over and had a few words with Wells, and I'm only guessing here but most likely something along the lines of "this is what I get for my eight million bucks?"
Wells had pleaded with the jury to return Libby to him, but Fitz begged them to return the truth. "Don't you think the American people are entitled to answers?" he asked. The jury of nine women and three men were extremely attentive to him, and my general impression is that he was quite persuasive. I personally think Scooter has lost touch with reality here, but if there is any tangent left, he's not sleeping easily tonight.
Related posts:
- The Taxpayers Paid Dick Cheney’s Personal Defense Attorney to Obstruct Any Inquiries Into His Crimes
- Could Cheney’s Lawyer’s Leak Break through the Cloud over Cheney?
- Cheney’s Lawyer Already Leaked the Content of Cheney’s “Privileged” Interview
- Cheney’s Betrayal Made an IIPA Charge for Libby Possible
- The Real Reason They’re Hiding Cheney’s Interview?





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Fitz!
((((((Jane))))))
Jane, I just love to read this and know you were there. Hell fucking yeah. Now I can go to bed and sleep well.
Oh yeah. FITZ!
GUILTY.
and then some.
Thank you, FDL, soooooooooooo much!
-
Your coverage has been awesome. Thanks so much for sharing your impressions. I truly hope the jury saw it this way, too.
You can’t expect Dick to yield supreme executive power just because some watery tarts threw a few swords at him.
Any clue as to what Jeralyn thought? I know she comes at this from a defense perspective – she has been somewhat critical of Wells for his theatrics, but more admiring of Jeffres.
Jane, thanks so much for being there.
though … i was hoping for one last politicstv video summarization. would have loved to see your physical impressions of wells and fitz!
It sure would be nice to see the good guys win one.
TEAM FDL!! Jane, Christy, Marcy, LHP, and everyone.
I missed the day, have just finished reading the liveblog. Besides the drunk tank, this is my favorite:
“Why would Libby make up a lie and rely on Russert. They’re not friends. It doesn’t make sense for him to use Russert.”
Because JudyJudyJudy was not credible?
I can’t see how the jury would not convict. I’ll be glad when the verdict is in.
Jane!
Wish I was there to see the big close. Glad you were there!
Oooh, baby! Such imagery. Such guilt. Damn, I love this descriptive writing. Jane, you’re going to have to post fantasies about Cheney and Scooter roasting on spits in hell when this is over, so we can continue to get our fix. I feel as though I was there. Thank you for all you’ve done here, overall, and with the great visual of a (likely) possible guilty verdict.
Will Christy still be there tomorrow?
Jane, truly thank you for firedoglake, the original idea, your heart and soul. I am thankful and appreciative of you, your work and the FDL team. Go Fitz!
Apologies up front, as I posted this on an earlier thread; but it was late in the comments. I have a question for the lawyers who comment here: If Bush does pardon Libby (and is forced to do so fairly soon to keep him from turning on Cheney/Bush), does that pardon actually keep Libby from being forced to testify? I have seen cases where a prosecutor grants immunity from prosecution to a participant so as to be able to force him/her to testify; I was under the impression that refusing to testify after being granted immunity is contempt of court and thereby a new crime which can be punished. In other words, would a presidential pardon for past misdeeds really shield Libby from further prosecution if he refused to testify or lied again under oath?
Video may have killed the radio star, but bloggers like you are killing TV news!
Conviction by Thursday and a pardon on Friday?
I just didn’t know what to expect. And, given the way truth has been treated by Busco. et al., I have to confess to not letting myself be optimistic. But, when Wells said “I must have been drunk”, I KNEW the defense was in trouble. I just couldn’t fathom why a sane atty would say this. Sounded to me that Wells totally undercut any authority (with the jury) he might have had with this one remark.
Reading Fitz’ last paragraph and then looking at his picture you have posted – Well he is the dreamiest man I ever laid eyes or ears on.
Beautiful summation. Thanks for giving us a feel for the courtroom. Wells’ head in hand, afraid to face the truth was an especially nice image.
Thank you Jane. We were all so happy that you, Christy and Marcy could be there to see the day unfold.
I’m curious – Marcy mentioned that some of you thought Wells had great body language and did well before lunch. Did he simply fall apart during the 2nd part of his presentation? I can’t imagine what the jury thought of his body language at the end of the day – not looking up the entire time Fitz was at bat.
Would donations for a transcript of Fitz’s rebuttal be in order? (I’d be willing to put in for a transcript of his opener too, just for completeness.)
presque vu @ 7
… not to mention moistened bints … :) ((((Jane))))
OMFG what a helluva day. Never in my wildest dreams have I ever seen such patriotic, brilliant citizen journalism. This from one who avidly followed Watergate — and believe me, the WaPo of that day (so much better and more ballsy than the eunuch WaPo of today) had nuttin on the FDL gang. My hat’s off to you all.
http://www.pulitzer.org take note!!! The ground has shifted and you are standing on it, Right Here.
Libby = traitor
Cheney = traitor
Rumsfeld = traitor
Gonzalez = traitor
Bush = traitor
Ashcroft = traitor
Feith = traitor
Rice = traitor
Hadley = traitor
Franklin = traitor
Them leave sorrow, tears and blood
Them regular trademark
We fear to fight for freedom
We fear to fight for liberty
We fear to fight for justice
We fear to fight for happiness
We must do something about this nonsense!
Indict, impeach, imprison these Vagabonds In Power!
Long live Fela Anikulapo Kuti!
Ok. That post was utterly fantastic! So totally awesome! Ladies, Please, Take a Bow!
wow
From your summary it sounds to me like they deliberately took a dive, perhaps because the decision has been made on high to retreat the defenses and build them back up around shooter. Perhaps Toensing was not about jury tampering after all, but rather about setting the stage for the next round, the battle royale for Cheney.
Waddayathink?
If my lawyer broke down in tears in open court, I might try to go over the table at him. That was a bit over the top. The jury must think he’s insane. I hope that doesn’t make them feel sorry for Scooter, for choosing such a freak for a lawyer.
Love it — thanks a zillion!
Jane, Marcy, et al, you have all just made history. You are watching – and reporting live – what could very well be one of the most important court cases this country has seen this young century. Whichever way the jury decides this, what this is is a watershed moment for our generation. If the press in this country was less corrupt, this complete trial would be on television half as much as the OJ Simpson trial was.
Thank you for bring this to us. This is the day that Dick Cheney’s lies and manipulations were put out by a person in some real authority. This isn’t lefty blogs speculating on the behind-the-scenes machinations. The person (Fitz) making these claims not only has real credibility, he’s also not afraid of the cold hard truth. This country more than than ever needs a man like that, and it needs people who are willing to sacrifice their selves so that the many will also know.
Thank you for your service to our country.
I can’t imagine what would give anyone that impression
;>)
Good health to you, J.
As someone said in another scandal, “guilty, guilty, guilty!”
http://images.ucomics.com/imag…..730529.gif
That is to say, Libby is guilty!!!!!!!
(Darn, it won’t let me inline the image).
Oklahoma kiddo @ 13
EPU’d from moi, a couple threads back:
Similar pools might be done around how long the deliberations will take, when and whether or not (if found guilty) Libby gets a pReznitial Pardon, the date that the next related trial is held, who is indicted, when the impeachment starts… Don’t want to count too many chickens but I thought I’d throw the idea out there, there’s such creativity amongst this community… :) so whaddayathink?
MattC at 32. Ditto my friend. Ditto
Jane and the gang scored center ice seats to game 7 of the Stanley Cup finals! Thanks for taking us on the ride with you Jane!
Jane!
[ok - so the zed’s long past. guilty.]
Jane! and poodles and Plame house and Plame Bloggers!
and Firecats…..cute, adorable Firecats.
Jane,
Thank you for pulling the FDL effort together. The whole of the last few weeks have been great. Tell your teammates that they are all special people.
Jane!
The running through the talking points (and correlating them) was key for me. Regardless of the verdict it stays.
Now why were they so pissed? Couldn’t they have just waited it out? Big deal. Wilson went on a trip examining the Niger claim. Whats up with that?
THANK YOU JANE for all you have done.
We await justice.
Thanks for all the great coverage, Jane, Christy, Marcy, Jeralyn and Swopa.
We await justice.
Oh, yeah!
Present at the creation of a new media paradigm, etc.
Thanks, Jane and FDL, for putting us right there as it happened. You so rock.
“A cloud over the Vice President.”
Yup.
========
Who’s Next?
========
heh heh
Eureka Springs, AR @
28
yes, WOW…
You know, when I heard that on the radio today, I thought it was pretty goddamn weird.
“Brooks Brothers Mountain”, or something. “I wish I could acquit you!”
Beautiful recap of a great day in court. Many thanks, Jane. Only one question:
I give up, any help?
Actually, objecting at that point would only serve to focus the jury’s attention on Fitzgerald’s argument. “Objection” sounds really great on TV, but to a juror it says: “Listen to this, that side thinks it’s hurting them really badly, bad enough to stand up and squawk about it.”
S.O.S. in MA—
Despite running the election pool I must oppose one in this situation.
We have generated enormous media attention because of the A plus coverage of the trial. I think it would undercut our credibility and serious purpose to be associated with a gambling pool for the outcome.
No video report today??
Nice summation, and hopefully a prescient foreteller of the past once this jury finishes its part of the process. There is one thing though that has been bugging me since I first read the Defence closing. If Russert was at that time an adversary/opponent to the VP/President, why then would Cathy Martin (VP’s press secretrary, right?) list it as the best forum to get their message out the way they wanted in on in her testimony earlier in the trial? You think that was missed by the jury, or could that be one of the things that helps undercut the Defence since they made such a big deal about it in the closing? Just a thought.
OldTimer @ 46
There’s a blogger around here, handle’s eRiposte. Yet another steel-trap mind. :) HTH
Does Wells have a history of teary theatrics? If not then he was caught in the trap of Libbys defense fund and all of the Hubris it represents.
Mind boggling to this pup…
TRex. you funny!
A not-bad Bloomberg summary, via Yahoo! is making me hopeful that Jane’s summary might be close to how the jury saw it. Oh please please please please please convict this lying neocon sack’o’___!
bobo
OldTimer @ 46
I give up, any help?
eRiposte has been building the case for truth brick by brick about Niger uranium, the aluminum tubes, and lying at the highest levels of the government.
OldTimer:
eriposte is a blogger over at:
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/
Oklahoma kiddo @
13
Predicting what juries will do is foolish.
Guilty on all counts next Tuesday. :)
Hope nobody forgot to feed the PlameHouse maw today; click on the “Donate” icon below Jane’s post, please, if you haven’t done so.
OldTimer @ 46
I give up, any help?
ROFLMAO! where are you eriposte?
egregious @
41
And may it come swiftly. Great closer, Jane. And awesome coverage today by Marcy and FLD team.
Old Timer, eRiposte
TRex @ 45
Let’s see if Wells wants him back after his term in the federal slammer! Probably will be too embarassed to associate with Scooter.
I haven’t seen it mentioned elsewhere, but the AP has additional defense exhibits up from last week.
Who emailed Clifford May’s piece to the OVP?
None other than Laurie Mylroie.
http://wid.ap.org/documents/li…..dx1795.pdf
LOL
egregious @ 48
Excellent point, taken. Suggestion withdrawn.
“Justice shall flow like water, and righteousness like a mighty stream,” unsullied by wagers.
TRex @ 45
Oh, My! An instant classic.
Scotian @ 50
I thought the same thing. Hopefully, someone on the jury notices that as well.
You can’t get 12 Americans together and not find a wingnut in the bunch. Hung Jury.
I’m going to have great dreams tonight. Thank you for writing such a marvelous description.
Isikoff was on Hardball earlier talking about how this is not likely to go any further than this trial. Is that a real possibility? I tend to think the whole thing is too big and that too much has gotten out for it not to.
What a hell of a ride it’s been, and thanks for all you have done, but why oh why didn’t you use Monk’s classic Fitz as ‘the Jesus’ for this post? That is the only possible way it could have been any better.
Scotian @ 50
HEY! Everyone- Scotian is getting into this delurking thing! He had so many great comments on the jury null/JNOW thread. Welcome, Scotian. Always great to hear from someone north of the border!
TRex, 707! hit my head on the floor, now choking and crying.
oh ohh oh he he he wheew.
steve ex-expat @ 66
… but then the other 11 land on the putative wingnut like 11 tons of brix, showering them with irrefutable logic, wearing them down and bringing them to the light.
Guilty! :)
Jane, this amazing citizen-coverage of a historical trial, this top-level analysis of a hugely important and complex crime – not to mention this community – wouldn’t ever have happened had you not decided one day to take a quixotic leap of faith and launch firedoglake. For this excellent post, and all that have led up to it, for the outstanding team you’ve drawn together, for all the posts to come, for all your dogged firedoglaking, a heartfelt thanks.
Ah Laurie Shillroie.
Who would have known.
It is amazing that the media still view the blogoshphere with a more jaundiced eye than they view Bush and Cheney.
Those two have done more to discredit and destroy journalists than the entire blogosphere could ever dream of.
-GSD
NewsClues @ 30
Is there any excuse for his behavior? I’d like to hear from the lawyers amongst us. Whether you’re a defense lawyer or a prosecutor – do you sit there with your head down while the other side gives final arguments?
Unbelievable… Can clients demand a refund?
Scarecrow!
So what was in the treasure hunt?
The early split between the President and the VP?
Mitchell’s role?
steve ex-expat @ 67
This might have been true last year and if the trial wasn’t in D.C.
Jane, you have that Gettysburg-Address-like, ability to capture the moment so economically.
We’re still waiting for the YouTube, should be up any minute.
What, no politics TV? Those have been my favorites.
brilliant and well done to all the FDL crew
tryggth @ 40
I have wondered that too. Given the compliant press, why not just move onto other things, and weather the storm? Given how the WMD house of cards so quickly collapsed, sans Wilson, it makes no sense. Except that these people are vindictive pricks.
But I guess at the time they thought the WMD thing would hold, so it was a shot across the bow of whistleblowers and critics. What they failed to realize was Joe Wilson stared down Saddam Hussein (afterall, they didn’t know Wilson), so he was not easily intimidated. In other words, they never dealt with a real Patriot before.
kml @ 67
Isikoff and the rest of them pray this is the end of it
What happens next to some extent depends on us
SOS in Maine,
Amen to the Pulitzer suggestion.
And yes, we didn’t get this kind of coverage of Watergate. This is such a treat.
I’m still loving what Fitz said:
“He stole the truth of the judicial system. You return guilty you give truth back.”
Where’s the teeshirts.
the defense counsel literally cried? Cried tears? And closed by asking them to return Libby to him? Weak.
Scooter is definitely not sleeping tonight – Fitz’s voice is going to be haunting him all night long.
“Nice resume you’ve got there, Scooter . . . it’d be a shame if something happened to it. Of course, I don’t think you need a resume for the jobs you might be applying for in your new location.”
“Nice friends you’ve got there, Scooter . . . of course, they aren’t the ones facing a move to (ahem) public housing. Of course, I’m sure they’ll give you a nice party before you move.”
“Nice boss you’ve got there, Scooter . . . anything you’d like to share with me about him? I could make it worth your while . . .”
Come to think of it, Cheney might not be sleeping really well tonight either.
excellent point, Pectopah!
I still fume over Shooter denying that he knew Joe Wilson…….
he and his crowd wouldn’t and couldn’t know a Patriot– someone so unlike them and their cabal.
dab from CT @ 75
I was taught to never cry in court; even if your goal is to make the jury feel sympathy for your client, your job is to lead them to tears. Actually crying yourself is usually seen as false. Real people try not to cry. They don’t actually cry in public. Watch people talking about something emotional on TV. They don’t cry, they get choked up as they choke themselves to avoid the show of emotion.
I would see his tears as the classic crocodile variety.
Gotta wonder if BigTime had a large yellowcake on its way to Baghdad marked “To: Saddam From: Niger” that would have validated the mushroom cloud WMD claims very prettily — but saw it all melt away with Ambassador Wilson’s NYT OpEd.
Jane,
I gotta believe that Libby, Wells and crew are regular readers of this blog.
I gotta believe that they view us as the enemy and look to our venom for their defense.
Sooooooooo Mr. Wells, We have a term here at the lake called 707, and when I read that you had your head in your hands, that was my state.
On. The. Floor. Laughing. Out. Loud.
I hope your night is restless Scooter. I will sleep like a rock!
Dick “Shooter” Cheney.
Loathed at home.
Reviled abroad.
Cheney receives a “hostile” reception in Japan.
-GSD
dab from CT @ 75
The way he’s been portrayed here, Wells has been such a disaster that I wonder if he’s purposely being the fall guy for an appeal. After a guilty verdict, can Scoots say he wasn’t represented adequately this time around? Don’t know much about courts, but then this thing can be dragged out longer, and probably after ‘08 elections at least. Dunno…just a thought….
(((((jane, jane, jane !))))
simply thank you, thank you for all of this and the unimaginable efforts to get us all here
plenty of misty eyed firedogs over at the FDL Bounce House this afternoon just thinking of you and Christy actually being there on this day, to see that close – yeowza!
Oh, and now that its over, shouldn’t Chimpy be asking Fitz (his employee) to lunch to ask what it was all about? Readers Digest version…
Can’t think of a single reason that shouldn’t happen.
TPhillip @ 57
I suspect the jury will take its duty seriously and will deliberate for several days, so no one can accuse them of being hasty, even it their minds are already made up.
Since I have a piss poor record of predicting the outcome of sporting events, I will not jinx this one with a further prediction, save the one above.
GSD @ 90
oh no, no more Koizumi hugs?
Sounds like Zeidenberg delivered the clinic, and Fitzgerald delivered the passion. And that Zeidenberg covered the “little” case while Fitzgerald covered the “big” case.
Fitzgerald, who seems to speak quite rapidly as a rule, may have been forced by the limits on time to speak more rapidly than planned or preferred, but at least he seems to have gotten it all in. I thought Fitzgerald very effectively demolished a few late-game doubts that Wells/Jeffress raised or re-raised – such as re Cooper’s 7/12 notes (which read like utter gibberish to me), and Russert being mistakenly named by Libby instead of Cooper or Novak, as well as how unique circumstances tend to make a person vividly recall a memory of something like a seaside conversation from years before, if not routine. It also sounded like we have Jack Eckenrode to thank for Tim Russert’s testimony, all the way around – Eckenrode’s early call to Russert at home, instead of the office, and his approach to Russert, seems to have let the cat out of the bag before GE & NBC’s lawyers had a chance to slam the door.
Fitzgerald’s telegraphing about Cheney and the broader investigation, and the appeal to the jury to deliver the truth to the American people, I imagine, really registered with the jurors, after Zeidenberg’s compelling recitation of the evidence constructed a very solid foundation at the start of the day.
Congratulations and grateful thanks for a job super well done, Special Counsel Fitzgerald, Deputy Special Counsels Zeidenberg, Riggs Bonamici, Kedian and Fleissner, and fellow staff and investigators who helped bring this one home. A golden day for justice in America, as the Scooter Libby case is handed over to the jury.
Jane, Christy, Marcy, and team (& Lurking Mod): I am very, very grateful to have had the access to this trial that your efforts and your passion have given us. May you be amply rewarded, in many ways, in recognition of the groundbreaking public service you provided to us all with your superb trial coverage.
Pectopah @ 81
it’s also the authoriatrian thing. cannot brook ANY dissent from a credible opponent. Must. Crush. Now.
Hey all, please give a big FDL welcome to Scotian, who has recently delurked.
Pectopah @ 81
They don’t just respond to their critics. They try to destroy them. That’s how they operate. If they were truly trying to respond to Wilson’s “What I Didn’t Find in Africa” article, they would have just said, “He didn’t look hard enough.” But they wanted to hurt Wilson, and they did it through his wife. Because that’s the kind of person Dick Cheney is.
GSD @ 91
He’s coming here this weekend. ABC (Aust. B’Casting Co) News Radio has been talking about the traffic tie-ups he’ll cause in downtown Sydney and at some of the favorite tourist areas near the harbor. Should do wonders for the image of the US. PM John Howard also taking heat as an election looms and even the Poodle (no offence Kobe) is bailing on Iraq.
GSD @ 91
Love it:
Seems to me that the Chief Cabinet Secretary may be following the Prettyman goings-on rather closely, yes?
egregious at 16 — I’m headed home tomorrow. My flight leaves late morning-ish.
Wells is an attorney who’s doing his job. The system doesn’t work without people like him defending the worst of the worst.
Just like Sam Adams defending redcoats or lawyers doing pro-bono work for Guantanimo detainees.
Libby is squirrely shitheel who is learning that things are great when you are in the catbird seat but that the powerful lose your number quickly when the worm turns.
-GSD
TeddySanFran @ 89
Try VX nerve gas intercepted by B-J. No wonder they were ticked. No WMD, what to do.
bonkers @ 91
I have thought the same thing on occaision. But if Scooter’s conviction were to be overturned on this basis, Wells and Jeffress would never work again in court.
So unless they are both looking forward to retiring in the next year or so…although, with the money they are being paid, perhaps that is part of the deal. But on the other hand, the amount of money and time and personpower spent on this case would itself make it hard to make that argument.
Welcome, Scotian. :)
Alice @
82
That’s kind of what I thought. Just bloviating on their part.
As far as it being up to us, what do we need to do? Send Fitz flowers, home cooked meals, beg him to continue his pursuit of justice?
Welcome to the delurked Scotian. Waving howdy from the west coast.
egregious @ 48
Oh, heck, I never win anyway!
angie @ 96
Koizumi took his Elvis act and up and quit. Now Shinzo Abe has to explain to his far right wingnut buddies why Bush sold them out and “negotiated with evil” when they cut a nice Condi Rice style deal with Kim Jong Il.
-GSD
Evening. Scotian! Welcome to the Lake! Would you like a paddle boat or some water wings?
Hope you’ll stick around for Late Nite.
Hiya Scotian!
I read some of your brilliance on the earlier thread– please stay out of the shadows.
heh, GSD @ 110.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 106
CHS- as ever, you can be counted upon to do the right thing! Hope your travel back to home base is “uneventful”.
Scotian!
You came back. Are you Scottish?
egregious @ 105
Is this your conjecture, egregioius? Or is there an article I missed?
Isikoff wants to get back on the Clenis beat pronto.
That man is another corrupt shitheel.
Yeah, Mike, I am talking to you.
-GSD
A number of people at Enron and Arthur Anderson knew about the fundamental problems that the spe’s (special purpose entities) posed. They just ignored the problem. It was as if they thought if they had enough faith, the rapture would rescue them. I think that faith-in-the-rapture was the heart of Scooter’s defense in addition to trying to make Scooter show his cards.
Thanks for all the hard work.
Reading today’s postings was exhilarating.
Hope springs eternal for a conviction.
egregious @ 114
I am guessing he is from Nova Scotia, New Scotland in latin….
Christy—
Safe trip, SO glad you could catch the summary. A speech for the ages.
Thank you for all your hard work and sacrifices. It matters.
i want to echo the multitude of thank yous to Jane, Marcy, Christy et al. This is your time to shine.
even now, the msm isn’t trumpeting this as the enormous story it is, the trial of this administration. i’m not even sure the summations will make the front pages tomorrow.
we here have been fortunate to get a full accounting, and in real time too. to jane, christy and the mighty truth squadron, i offer my humblest, mos heartfelt thanks.
egregious — Wouldn’t have missed it with all the reporting we’ve done on this case. Now comes the hard part — waiting for the jury.
Pete,
Is Ratty Howard going to get knocked off his pedestal?
Will Cheney patronizingly pat his head like Bush does?
-GSD
Christy Hardin Smith @ 107
Thank you very much, I have been very impressed with your work over these many many moons since this fiasco started. You have provided a very welcome voice to read and I thank you for it, and am very grateful to be able to tell you so directly.
GSD @ 117
It is kind of a funny feeling to think TradMed may very well be reading. Probably not the comments, though.
{waving furiously to David Schuster, just in case}
Hellllooooooo!~
I never realized adrenaline could be transmitted electronically, but today’s blogging brought thousands of us close to the pervasive power of JUSTICE! Fitz is my hero, and Jane, Christy, Marcy, Jeralyn, Swopa, Pachacutec, egregious, TRex, et al., are the picture window into this momentous trial.
We cannot thank you enough for the service you have done, and continue to do, for us and our nation. Now I’m tearing up (shades of Wells?). Thank you!!!!
Christy Hardin Smith @ 124
or to borrow from the Stones:
“I’m Just Waiting on a Verdict”
Oh, Teddy. You are incorrigible.
Chief Libby trial blogger says she believes prosecutor ‘wants Cheney,’ ‘won’t rest on laurels’
http://www.rawstory.com//news/….._0220.html
((((CHRISTY !)))
something tells me the actual events of today exceeded your expectations – you have more than earned it with all your efforts and sacrifice
thank you for all of this
Rats in the Westwing.
Phone-bugs down town.
What a mess.
This towns in tatters.
-GSD
Woodhall Hollow @ 120
Actually both of you are correct in different ways. I am a born and bred lifelong bluenoser (Nova Scotian) of mostly Scottish roots with some Irish in the mix so both descriptions are why I use this alias. I like hitting more than a single target with my thinking wherever possible…:)
In the event of a conviction, what might we expect with the sentencing? Regarding that, tonight on PBS Newshour Carol Leonnig said about Judge Walton that “he has a reputation as being very clear, commonsense, no bones about it kind of judge, but he’s also called by many in the defense bar ‘a long ball hitter’—he attaches long penalities.”
Could it be true??? (Be still my beating heart!) Does anyone have information about Walton and sentencing? I know this is all speculative, but Walton’s reputation could certainly play into Libby’s decision to bargain or not.
The clincher Fitz delivered, and reiterated, was the gamble Scooter made that Russert would not talk, not realizing he had spilled the beans already to the FBI. That sealed the deal for me. Had he not talked, then Scooter gets away with it. I suspect, it was that one loose thread that Fitz’s team first discovered, that unwound the whole ball of yarn. Had Russert invoked priviledge, we would not be here. While the case could be made without Russert, it likely got started because of him.
lamujersalvaje @ 135
That should help him develop a conscience overnight — I’m telling you Scoots, the Ghost of Fitzmas Yet to Come…..
As a trial lawyer, I have to commend the prosecution. If one can construct a final argument so powerful that opposing counsel is fooled into wasting time defending himself rather than his client the case is generally over. That has always been my goal and it works.
GSD @ 125
Howard is facing the first serious opposition from the ALP in the form of Kevin Rudd, who has been quite effective despite having the charisma of an accountant. However Howard is a wily and unscrupulous survivor and when on the ropes will do something to appeal to the baser instincts of the electorate. Lat time he manufactured a refugee crisis (Google “The Tampa Incident”) that appealed to the Aussie’s inner racist. It will be hard fought and close. I’m not making any bets at this point. No election date set yet.
I am just amazed at the lack of msm coverage. MSNBC awhile ago had all sorts of links to Britney checking into rehab and Anna Nicole’s body rotting, but nothing, nada, rien about the trial.
Pectopah @ 136
I don’t know, Fitz said in his closing that 9? people told the story and it did not all depend on Russert.
If anyone is interested in the Newshour story with Carol Leonnig, here is the link. The part about the long ball hitter is at the very end.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/media/leaks/
Think Barbara Comstock is feeling confident tonight?
What does it say about tradmed that I’ve been lurking all day on these posts and all we got on MSNBC during the day is Anna Nicole Smith estate trial gavel to gavel coverage…. Got priorities? (I do)
At long last…it’s time to check out the nightly PoliticsTV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHyMCUe0nSs
It’s a little slow loading and we will add it to the front page shortly.
lamujersalvaje at 8:28 pm
Everything I have read is that Scooter will appeal until January 2009 when Bush will pardon him.
It would be nice if we could get the media to ask Bush at every single
*uckingPC until then, if he has plans to pardon Scooter. IIRC, lhp said there was almost no chance Walton could put Scooter in jail before his appeals are exhausted. Perjury and obstruction are not regarded as violent crimes.Sandia Blanca @ 128
I think that’s an apt description. At the gabbly party we were having -to keep pressure off the servers – we were swooning and following with baited breath. (We also felt a lot of empathy for Marcy who did an amazing job of trying to keep up with Fitz)
I think Babs is just hoping the jury doesn’t return a verdict tomorrow. Every second that jury stays in deliberation gives her more reason to hope.
Duh! I was trying to figure out where these references to traditional medicine – tradmed – were coming from. I thought I missed something. . . Don’t do that to me!
What a great day! Thanks to all at FDL. I gladly made my contribution moments ago and will sleep soundly tonight. Good night and good luck.
puppethead @ 142
Sure, the check will clear.
musicsleuth @ 144
Yeah, it’s very evident. I’m hoping that will change after the guilty verdict and especially when Fitz indicts Shooter.
egregious @ 105
Yes yes yes! Brewster-Jennings may have done their job of interdicting WMD components too well. Ever wonder why this administration couldn’t plant the goods? Even a rookie narc has no trouble pulling something incriminating out of pocket in a drug bust. And these guys, with the full resources of the US, couldn’t pull it off?
It’s in character for Shooter and his henchmen to take down B-J after-the-fact, regardless (or heedless) of consequences. And that act, in the end, may be what eventually brings them down.
Scotian @ 133
A Bluenoser! Haven’t heard that term in quite a long time, though I have some strong family connections in Nova Scotia (Shelburne County).
oh, thank you for the vlog!
“Madness, madness, madness!”
sweet dreams and thank you all.
Oh, my gosh, what a lovely, super-talented, and whip-smart trio of Lake Ladies in the video above.
I am honored just to be a part of this enterprise.
Jane, heard you speaking with Thom Hartmann this morning. You sounded great. Hope you’re feeling great as well. Thanks for your efforts.
TRex @ 130
Truer words were never spoken. “Incorrigible” is the first polysyllabic word I recall my grandmother ever saying, and it was directed my way.
Great newsy video!! thanks ….. for everything
blue e @ 141
It was the motive thing he was talking about. I agreee the 9 people was convincing, but when it came to motive to lie, it was the belief Libby could get away with it, because reporters won’t talk (Something Bush pronounced in a press briefing around the time, and tantamount to obstruction of justice IMHO).
Fitz hammered this point. Libby was going to hide behind the skirts of reporters, and had to pick one. Since he had a phone record to Russert, he was the mark. But he picked the wrong reporter. He should have gone with Judy. Russerts FBI conversation was the opening that Team Fitz needed to unravel the case.
I found that peice of the puzzle putting me well beyond reasonable doubt in my attempts to be objective.
Thank you for video wrap-up! Trex will have a tough act to follow tonight.
angie @ 87
Great video! I think I’m in love.
TRex @
156
Yes. Amazing women.
The video! Wonderful description and all of you had great looking hair :)
The three of you play well off of each other with different strengths and perspectives. It was most effective.
My best thoughts to everyone at FDL. Your coverage has been stellar, superb. Better than any MSM news we would have ever received anytime, anywhere. You guys are the best.
I am hoping that if Scooty Scoot does get convicted that a pardon would not be immediate. Can you imagine the ramifications of that? I will probably have to pick myself up off the floor at that point.
Scarecrow what about the NYT??
Re Frank Probst @ 100: “They don’t just respond to their critics. They try to destroy them. That’s how they operate. If they were truly trying to respond to Wilson’s “What I Didn’t Find in Africa” article, they would have just said, “He didn’t look hard enough.” But they wanted to hurt Wilson, and they did it through his wife. Because that’s the kind of person Dick Cheney is.”
It’s been said before, but this was likely an ongoing effort at elevating and expanding a shallow reign based on intimidation and fear as much as it was an attempt to hush a notable critic. Selling his part by being a destroyer was critical for his unfettered control.
***
One of my favorite Fitzgerald descriptions today was how the purpose of being questioned repeatedly in front of a Grand Jury is like being in a house of mirrors. Some people assuredly would get excited at the thought of seeing Fitz’s gaze simultaneously from a dozen different angles, but it just reveals how, once inside his house, he can reflect a situation to expose those angles you didn’t know could become visible to others. Not_where_you_want_to_be if you’ve got something to hide.
.
Libby Indicted. Libby Convicted. Libby Pardoned. Same shit. Different day.
dmg @
98
You can’t view this thing strictly through the Wilson/Plame prism. It has to be understood throught the larger prism of the ongoing battle between the CIA and the OVP. Cheney’s fury is as much directed against the CIA as Wilson/Plame, and that may have been his fatal mistake, letting his bile get way ahead of his brain. The Plame affair was blowback against the CIA.
egregious @ 167
egregious — You referring to my comment about 10 hours ago? or what? I’ve been at work and composing, so I probably missed something.
Zig alert. Too many boxed quotes of other quotes will break the margins.
After Fitzmas, it’s New Year’s Eve! Give me an address where I can send a case of Cristale, Jane et al.!
Something about the press coverage of Scooter relative to ANS.
The costliest battle in US history is Gettysburg, 50,000 US killed in three days. Pickett’s Charge on the third day was the last large battle, but Lee never would have had to order that charge, had it not been for the martyrdom of the 1st MN on the second day along with great heroism of Joshua Lawrence Chamberalin’s 20th Maine on Little Round Top. These are but two examples that are well known to Gettysburg buffs, but no one else. Large battles, are nothing more than a collection of smaller battles. Our hope is that Scooter’s trial will be a turning point, in the larger, longer war to get our country back.
Scarecrow—yeah it’s been a little busy today :o
Did you answer in your thread? I’ll hike back and take a look, thx.
Thank you all so so so much.
Jane, just to let you know Shooter is in Tokyo now and we’re doing our best to make him sweat Protesters at U.S. Embassy and on the radio the press
is bashing him for refusing to discuss the Kyoto accords and refusing to meet with Japanese defense minister who recently condemned the Whitehouse for going into Iraq. Long live Fitz and FDL!
Oh to have been there in person! I’m more in love with Fitz than ever. Hey Maxwell Caulfield has a bald spot too, ya know.
An America the “Mainstream” though was aslepp in Anna Nicole Smith’s deflated breasts is arousing itself.
I trust the jury will take each of the five counts into careful account.
egregious @ 175
I didn’t answer. But the answer is in tomorrow a.m.’s first post.
delurking to say excellant coverage from all the ladies and gents.
Great video.
What will occupy your time during deliberations?
I know I will be on pins and needles. Hoping for a quick ending.
i_m_bobo @
54
Well, the thing where they link to the bio and voting record of Joe Wilson, 4th term Congressman from South Carolina, is a bit embarrassing.
Fitz’s triple “Madness” is – of course from Shakespeare’s “Comedy of Errors” which one would expect a good Jesuit educated boy to know.
It also the ending dialogue from Bridge on the River Kwai.
I can see how the latter would be much in keeping with his thinking.
Garrett @ 180
Hope they don’t out his wife, poor fellow.
TRex @
130
And you can incorridge him all you like.
Jane, so much thanks for getting this all up and running over the years — but please, as soon as the verdict is in, if you are going to do chemo — please go get it on. Waiting more than two or three months between surgery and the chemical search for odd bad cells is not exactly recommended. Just as this world needs some institutional memory of WWII and McCarthy’s era — and later Watergate, so will it need 20 years from now Plamegate. So please, get on with the chemo, and then work on the scrip for this, and make the film.
Garrett @ 180
That’s just some lame Yahoo page-generating SW. The original Bloomberg article didn’t have a link to the wrong Joe Wilson. Next time I’ll avoid the Yahoo reprints, if this is how I get treated :>
bobo
“… but then the other 11 land on the putative wingnut like 11 tons of brix, showering them with irrefutable logic, wearing them down and bringing them to the light.
Guilty! :)”
SOS at 72,
I assume you have never tried to argue with a wingnut.
dcgaffer, thanks very much. I knew Shakespeare, but not Comedy of Errors. I forgot about Bridge on the River Kwai.
Sara @ 184
Seconded.
I’m about two hours by train south of Tokyo.
No,they don’t like Bush or Cheney here in Japan either, but they are so polite you have to get em drunk to admit it.
File under : sometimes a Dick is just a dick.
lolomiya @ 175
Congrats to you and your friends, lolomiya!
________________________________________________
egregious @ 181
ROTFLMAO
Egregious -
Thanks :}
Well, it took me most of the evening and into the night to catch up on today’s live-blogging, but it was worth every minute. Great coverage, great video summary. Kudos and mega-thanks to Jane, Christy, Marcy, and all the team for the wonderful trial coverage. Fitz’s great rebuttal just made it all the more obvious what’s really at stake here and why so many heavy hitters stepped up to contribute to Scooter’s “defense fund.” Gotta preserve that firewall.
Can you guys do this on a nightly basis-even after the trial? I blew up my television years ago and I’d forgotten how nice it is to actually hear the news instead of reading it from my computer screen
Excellent excellent excellent work, Guys.
Thank you again to all at FDL that has made this happen. I cannot help but think out Founding Fathers are looking down in approval and saying “Yeah, this is what we were talking about!” And, of course, Abigail Adams, once again gently reminding them to “remember the ladies” and holding you three up as examples. I stand in awe.
FDL Rocks!
egregious @
165
I agree – really well done – but I couldn’t help notice that SOMEONE had the giggles early on… Kudos for keeping things together for the entire (well, one edit) thing. Thank you, please take good care and I hope the pillow fight is a distant memory, and you are all asleep by now.
i think one of the reasons wells thought it would be effective for him to play his “crying game” card, was b/c the jury had already proven they had a flair for the dramatic (save one), when they came in wearing those red shirts w/ white hearts on valentines day. just hope their love of theatrics doesnt color their ability to see the used car salesman for who he is. regardless of the verdict – looking forward to the civil suit – gonna be good ;)
thanks to all at FDL for your dedication & your humor throughout this process. MUCH appreciated.
be well jane
Great liveblogging and video summary (as usual!) of the Libby trial.
Sending a Paypal donation to you at Plame House for unrestricted use. Champagne anyone?
And is it too early to start planning for the Wilsons’ civil trial against Bush Administration officials? or to prepare for a possible Shooter Trial?
Hi to Scotian from a Canadian on the west coast with roots near Crieff and Downpatrick. Enjoyed your posts on another blog. Glad to see you here!
My last 2 cents for tonight: Libby is open to further charges wrt leaking the NIE. But Fitz may save time and go after DC himself if he’s already got enough for that big step.
Shooter’s smoking gun went off but the lingering mushroom cloud over his head is the evidence of how badly it backfired.
It’s well past midnight where I am but since breakfast, (with a couple of breaks to walk the dogs) I’ve been glued to this site and checking out links other readers have offered up. Reading and re-reading all your posts … and all the responses, I am literally blown away – and I’m not even American – I’m a Canuck … (well okay, half American, thanks to my dad.)
I get the feeling that Fitz is *personally* offended by what’s happened in all this, that this case has made him angry inside — I sense a true and honest man pleading for his people and his country and truly believing in all the good it has to offer – despite what Libby/Cheney/et al have done there. And it’s this feeling of his being offended that gives me hope for America, and I’ll be honest, these last couple of years I haven’t had much hope. Still, I think you guys have a true hero in Fitz … he ain’t the last honest man down there, but right now, he’s the most visible – courtroom-wise. What Fitz said in his rebuttal about “giving the truth back” — I read it and almost wept. He gives me hope for you guys and for everyone in every country around the world that is affected by what Americans do, world-wide. My country included
To Fitz, I give a hug and kisses on both cheeks. It feels so good to finally believe again that maybe justice WILL prevail. It’s been a long time since I felt this way. Still, we will await the verdict. Pray that justice will be done.
One final request. Because this day of reporting by FDL folks has been so monumental to me, and so gratifying, I’d like to donate to help you keep it all going, but would like to send you a money order and have been unable to find an address to send it to.
Please post a snail-mail address if you can and I’ll get it off to you in the next two days. Please tell me who I should make it out to. Solid journalism needs to be supported.
Thanks again for all you guys have done.
[Mod Note; welcome, BetteB. At the end of Jane’s post, just before the comments start is the snail mail address. You can also find it on the front page, in the right-side banner, just below the blog ads. Thanks.]
Thank you all so very much for providing us this service. I’m so impressed by all of you, and I will miss your broadcasts. Here’s to a reunion on the Cheney indictment!
BetteB:
If you scroll up to the end of Jane’s post, there is a paypal button the left and a snail mail address on the right. These are at the bottom of every post just before the comments start.
I agree – Fitz gives us hope because he is as offended as we are and he still has hope.
BetteB @ 200—
I believe this is it:
The Fire Dog Lake Company
8033 Sunset Blvd. #966
Los Angeles, CA 90046
“Solid journalism needs to be supported.”
HEAR, HEAR !
lolomiya @ 176
To the good people of Tokyo… Domo aragato gozaimus…. Thank you.
Dick Cheney can run, but he can’t hide.
Thanks to the moderator, Suzanne and City Girl too, for your responses. How I failed to see that posted snail mail address after all the time I spent here today is mind-boggling, but somehow my eyes slurred right over it every time. OY!
Sorry for being such a dope … but whatever, the post office is open tomorrow and I’ll head up to get that money order and send it off to you. That’s a promise etched in stone. I’m going to bed now – mind still buzzing but with hope in my heart – it’s been a long and unforgettable day, thanks to you all. Be well, all of you … and keep up the good work.
Did anyone get poor teary Mr. Wells a Kleenex?
I just have to say how amazingly proud I am of the wonderful women who have made this trial coverage happen. “Proud” is the only word that comes to mind. I get a tremendous sense of uplift and power flowing through these fantastic females. Wow! Three cheers! Three times three times three cheers!
From now on I want all my television news to be exactly like this report. Please put Jane, Christy, Marcy and Jeralyn on the air every day. They are the only news anchors, and that apartment is the only backdrop that I ever want to see. As an energy-saving economy measure, we can immediately replace CNN, FOX, NBC, CBS and ABC with FDL. That will save electricity, and greatly reduce global warming by stopping the greenhouse effect due to the other network gasbags. Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann can substitute whenever the FDL gals feel like taking the night off.
presque vu @
7
WELLS: I thought we were an autonomous collective …
FITZ:You’re fooling yourself. We’re living in a dictatorship, A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes …
WELLS: There you are, bringing class into it again …
loving the coverage and the comments but now must go to bed . . . don’t care if it’s been said a zillion times . . . merry fitzmas to all and to all a good night
dcgaffer @
181
Perhaps he was going after the woman that was the literary critic there. She might explain that the opening was from Shakespeare…and all the jury would be in awe.
Ladies your tv spot was FABULOUS!
As a meta-aside:
I can’t wait for you guys to do the movie version of this. It should be a multipart series. Forgot the 90-180 minute cinema cram game. You guys could do a really detailed multi-hour saga. It would be the equivalent of a season or two of tv.
I think we’d all love it. You could go into real depth on all the players. It would be awesome! Think Apollo 13 style re-enactment.
Three fabulous women! What a pleasure to watch & listen to the three of you giving analysis. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
I waited for the whole download on dialup before watching.
Christy said kerffufle!! *s*
Y’all are as wonderful as everyone says you are. Believe it!
Thank you so much.
Dear Christy, Jane and Marcy:
This is beyond every fantasy I have ever had; a story about powerful men ensnared by their own dark designs. Over and over we see this: an early Cheney ensnaring a later Cheney by objecting strenuously to Senator Graham over the NSA leaks, making it impossible for himself to de-rail the investigation into the outing of Valorie Plame; an early Libby ensnaring a later Libby by deciding to lie about Russert, not knowing Russert had already spilled the beans; an early Hadley ensnaring a later Hadley when he presented Libby as a v-e-r-y busy, v-e-r-y important personage only to be hung up high by Fitz. Ashcroft earlier, taking his own self out of a critically important position, resulting in the appointment of a bull dog prosecutor with the power to take on the Administration itself.
There are so many more examples, and it is SO delightful to watch commupance making the rounds. It actually makes watching current events on TeeVee enjoyable, because with this mind set I can watch the most disgusting politician, and wonder “Did he just put a shiv in his own back?” Not since the Watergate Hearings have I felt such a surge of hope for our great nation.
Thank you so much for doing what you love doing — each one of you. It is so very, very much appreciated.
Wow, what a nicely done video. And it was so nice to just sit back in my chair and have Jane and everyone highlight today’s trial stuff. More! More! And ladies, you look really great. The spiffy look is definitely the way to go!
Also, Jane, once again, so nice to have you back! :)
Steven Joseph :)
In comment #100, Frank Probst says:
I’ve never heard anyone talk about who pulls Cheney’s strings (or pushes his buttons — controls him — runs him). Does everyone actually think he makes all his descisions and plots his course on his own? He never hangs out with anyone on his level or higher in the …umm oligarchial hierarchy? I don’t believe it. And more to the point, I’m disappointed I never hear of anyone digging into it. I’m disappointed we are conned by the myth he does all this shit on his own just ‘cuz he’s a thug.
Give me John Wilkes Booth back!!!
Give me Ken Lay back. Give me maf54 back. Give me Ted Haggard back….
cue to ‘head in hands sitting at desk’ in dramaqueen ploy.
give me back my candy!!!!
I have scanned FDL almost since it started and have yet to comment. Lurking and reading all the while
Thanks Thanks and Thanks again for your hard work and excellent content. Truly Splendid!
Margot @ 82
Much as I love Maine lobstahs, Margot, the USPO abbrev for Maine is ME and Massachusetts is MA. Elsewise, tyvm! :)
OK, Pulitzerinistas, ball’s in your court!
steve ex-expat @ 185
Hmm yah, I have, and I thought of that as I posted #72. I’ve also learned not to feed trolls over the years, but that lesson was hard to learn. Oftentimes arguing with a wingnut just doesn’t penetrate (as they would say about us) … but I can hope can’t I? :) :)
Anent arguing with concrete-headed wingnuts it was cool to see Ann Coulter totally stymied and unable to refute a question posed by of all Milquetoast liberals, Alan Colmes, recently — Check this article on C&L. Coulter really looked impotent (a curiously apt word in that case, I fear)… :(
What cool women! How lucky we are to have you three there documenting this trial. Thank you.
You FDL gals are GREAT thanks so much. I’m completely hooked and have my fingers crossed, hoping for sweet justice. wow. thanks for your fabulous reporting.
That was so WAY TOO DAMN GREAT! What a super fajulous round-up. If I were, er “straight” and didn’t have a husband, I’d be trying to marry all three of you at once. Y’all, (plus Swopa and Pach) are like my very own personal Patrick Fitzgerald.
I’ve been following you’ns (that pronoun is for you, Christy, heh!) this whole trial and have appreciated every minute of your non-stylized professional realness, which now shames entire networks.
OK, I’m gushing. But you’ns WAY deserve it.
WHAT A TEAM!
I’m not the first to say this, nor will I be the last:
FITZ!!!
Absolutely loved the video wrap up. All the segments on PoliticsTV have been great, but this one was the very best, IMHO.
I was so happy to hear Marcy say that for the first time she feels like Fitz is going after Cheney.
Best regards,
Joanne
“Jeffress looked like he was about to have a conniption fit.”
Thanks for the shout-out, Jane!
I had no idea Jane is so smoking hot!
[Mod Note; pick one name and stick with it. Sock puppetry is reason to be banned from this site.]
One trial Ted Wells did not cry at was the tobacco case. It being a bench trial, there was no jury to cry to. And if he’d tried crying to Judge Gladys Kessler, she would have been sorely tempted to show him the underside of her gavel–on top of his head. She would not have responded well, and he knew it.
At one point in the tobacco trial, she showed B&W attorney David Bernick how she felt about such tactics. The following is from http://www.tobacco-on-trial.co…..aybe-not/:
Mr. Bernick came perilously close to popping out of the zone once when, after determining that Dr. Dolan could cite no other defendant but B&W who had actually said they did not market to people under 21, he said,
“So, the only one you are sure about is my poor client, Brown & Williamson.”
Even Judge Kessler, who is not given to such interruptions, couldn’t resist a smile as she said,
“Let’s not bring out the violin, Mr. Bernick.”
RE: dab from CT @ 75
Remember Tom Hanks’s line in the movie about women playing professional baseball during WWII (he was a former professional baseball player managing one of the teams)? “There’s no crying in baseball!” You can say the same rule applies to lawyers trying cases. Every rule has an exception, of course. I’ve come close to losing my composure a couple of times in closing arguments to juries in the sentencing phase of a death-penalty trial. It’s difficult not to water your notes with tears when you’re asking a jury to spare your client’s life.
Jurors can tell the difference between a faux drama queen’s manufactured crocodile tears and a lawyer’s genuine struggle to keep his or her emotions under control. A trial lawyer has a duty to control his client and Wells failed to control Scooter, except that he may have persuaded him not to testify. If Scooter had testified, he would have committed perjury yet another time and today Fitz probably would still be cross examining and subjecting him to the storied death by a thousand cuts. Scooter’s defense was disorganized and inconsistent with the defense opening statement. As FDL’s Mighty Trio pointed out, Wells spent too much time during his closing argument defending himself, which is the equivalent of admitting that he screwed up. “Methink the lady doth protest too much!” comes to mind. When he finally got around to defending Libby, he’d used up too much time and was forced adopt a defensive and unprepared scatter-gun approach to the prosecution’s opening closing argument. He seemed unprepared and disorganized. Ultimately, he could only cry and beg the jury to return Scooter to him. His plea struck me as something a child might say to a parent who disciplined him by taking away his favorite little red scooter. All that he managed to accomplish was to create an opportunity for Fitz to exploit, and Fitz exploited it to the max when he asked the jury to return the truth to the courtroom.
Although Wells didn’t have much of a case, he only succeeded in allowing himself to be played by his client and then by Fitz and his team. No wonder he shielded his eyes from everyone in the courtroom during Fitz’z rebuttal. He made a fool out of himself and paid for it big time. Flopping in front of a nationwide, possibly worldwide audience must be devastating. Of course, his eight million dollar fee no doubt will reduce the sting, so it’s hard to work up any sympathy for him.
By now, he should realize that Scooter’s only viable strategy was to tell the truth, plead guilty, and testify against the Prince of Darkness and his idiot sidekick. I think we can legitimately question whether he was representing Cheney’s best interests, rather than Libby’s. If so, he committed an ethical violation on top of everything else that he failed to do.
Are eight million excuses sufficient to justify his tawdry effort? If so, he isn’t any better than the man he defended, whether that man is Cheney or Libby.
You three ladies have done an outstanding job. These politics-tv summations are superb. It’s sad to think there will be no more of them when this trial is over.
Just make it a rout all the way up Pennsylvania Ave….
A cloud ain’t good enough.
Let it rain …