
(Graphics luv to WolfBlog.)
We have a President, not a king. The Congress of the United States is charged with the duty of oversight, of providing both a check and a balance -- along with the Federal judiciary -- to the excesses and overreaches of the Executive Branch of government. What the Bush Administration has failed, repeatedly, to understand is that they hold office for a finite period -- a discrete term of years -- and that their duty ought to be to the betterment of the whole of the American public, and not just to burnish George Bush's legacy and reputation at any cost.
What the Republican Party has failed to comprehend is that their own political legacy is now sinking like a stone because they have tied themselves -- hook, line and stinking sinker -- to the fortunes and abysmal failures of George Bush. The Republican party is reaping what they so blithely sowed, over and over again, in a bid for hanging onto their own personal fiefdoms at the expense of the American public.
The Republican Party and the Bush Administration are two peas in a greedy little malignant pod -- putting their own personal interests first, whatever the cost to the rest of us outside their tiny little power bubble.
From Peter Beinart in Time:
President Bush is taking the long view. He has been reading biographies of George Washington. He recently bemoaned "short-term historians." He keeps mentioning Harry Truman, a President reviled when he left office but rescued by posterity. Bush says he doesn't think about his legacy, but more and more, it's what he seems to think about most.I wish he wouldn't. In theory, thinking about your legacy should be humbling. But in Bush's case, it's making him increasingly reckless. Bush knows that historians will see him through the prism of Iraq: if the war is a failure, so is he. So he's paying any price to win. Were he focused on the present, he might see that the war is already lost. Instead, he's gazing over the horizon, trying to dig himself out of his Iraq hole and making it ever deeper as a result...
Those limits should be blindingly clear today as an exhausted American military tries to stitch Iraq back together, in a country and a region where the only thing Sunnis and Shi'ites agree upon is that they hate us. Bush seems to think historians reward Presidents who never give up hope. And when that hope is justified by the facts, they do. But sometimes they reward Presidents for abandoning their hopes so they don't become obsessions. The best thing Bush can do for his legacy is to stop trying to change it. The more he accepts that history's die is already cast, the more merciful history will be.
No more blank checks for this President. No more.
The rubber stamp Republicans handed him and his Administration whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted it -- as though they were indulgent parents trying to fend off yet another Presidential tantrum if they said no. And look what we have to show for it.
And, yet, so many of the Republicans in Congress still do not get it. This is not a question of holding onto power regardless of the costs to the military and the American public -- but to the Republican leadership in the House and Senate, it's all about salvaging their own individual political hides, and to hell with the day to day consequences for real American families whose sons and daughters, husbands and wives, fathers and mothers are all serving in far off lands under very, very difficult conditions.
One of the Republican House members who has broken ranks with the lockstep GOP vote is Rep. Ric Keller of Florida, who put the welfare of our individual troops front and center in his remarks yesterday:
Rep. Ric Keller (Fla.), a reliable conservative vote, prefaced his statement with an affirmation of support for Bush personally. But, he said, a "surge" of troops had already been attempted in Baghdad. "The benefits were temporary," he said. "The body bags were permanent."Those 11 could be just the tip of the iceberg. One Republican lawmaker close to the leadership, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said GOP leaders have 50 to 60 Republicans on their watch list, with between 40 and 60 expected to break with the White House tomorrow. (emphasis mine)
The fact is that the Republicans know -- they KNOW -- that the Bush Administration has failed in Iraq and that the long-term consequences of that failure are far-reaching for our foreign policy, our military strength, for our nation's reputation, and for the long-term stability of the Middle East and beyond as the conlfict between Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims heats to the boiling point under our inept string pulling pressure.
The Republican leadership KNOWS that George Bush's policies have been a failure, and yet it is their party's reputation and their own hold on power that concerns them most. From the WaPo:
Republicans knew they had a weak hand to play as the House began its three-day debate on Iraq and whether to support Bush's 20,000-troop "surge." "The debate should not be about the surge or its details," Republican Reps. Peter Hoekstra (Mich.) and John Shadegg (Ariz.) wrote to colleagues in a letter intercepted by Democrats. "This debate should not even be about the Iraq war to date, mistakes that have been made, or whether we can, or cannot, win militarily. If we let Democrats force us into a debate on the surge or the current situation in Iraq, we lose."
Yes, heaven forbid GOP leadership that the nation be told the truth about how your absurd farce of a Parliament Congress, for six long years of the Bush Administration provided no meaningful oversight, no real check whatsoever to excesses and idiocy, no balancing of any kind -- but merely one long string of "whatever you want, so long as we can continue to prance about and pretend like we have some power" regardless of the cost in lives, in limbs, in deficit spending, in long-term consequences as failure after failure piled up on the Republican Congress' doorstep.
Heaven forbid that any Republican in a leadership position own up to being wrong. Take responsibility for failing to take action, stand up and say no to the petulant Boy King when it could have done some good for the entire nation.
GOP -- it now stands for Got Our Power (and screw the rest of you). How's that working for you now, folks? Because you sure as hell don't seem to have noticed that it is decidedly NOT working for the majority of Americans who think that you, the Republican party and your President Who Would Be King are failing the rest of us.
No more blank checks. Not for you Republican party hacks, not for President Bush, not for any of the lot of you -- because you put your own personal power interests ahead of the nation. You have all earned yourselves a big, fat time out. (And yes, my momma roots are showing here, but really...putting your own greedy need for power ahead of the interests of the whole nation? So wrong, on so many levels.)
No more blank checks. I want my Constitution restored. I want my governmental structure balanced. I want the people elected to represent this nation of ours to understand that they work for us, not the other way around. And I want accountability. Now.
***A note to the folks following our Libby trial coverage: Court will resume this afternoon at 1:30 pm ET, along with our live coverage.***
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FITZ! Christy, Marcy, Jane!
Justice!
Thanks so much to Jane and Marcy for including me at the courthouse. It was a breathtaking experience for a prosecutor’s daughter to see Fitzgerald in action.
I will always remember this experience.
Watching the President’s unsteady and charmless press conference yesterday I kept expecting him to announce he was sending Jocelyn Elders to Iraq.
OOOH RAAAH!
Do you think we could possibly get Speaker Pelosi a nice new table setting? I suggest the Impeachment pattern.
Really, *start* the damned impeachment *NOW*, investigate the hell out of it. Waiting until you have all the votes when you don’t have all the evidence out is insane, it’s verdict first, then the trial. Please, start the impeachment and investigate the hell out of the W and Cheney. When everybody sees just how bad it is the votes will follow.
Investigate that Coleman!
Valentines is D-Day in my line of work - veterans of the experience know you just put your head down and trudge through it -
my load was somewhat lighter throughout the 12 hours as I went in yesterday with a promise to myself to give half to FDL (me heartin’ ya and all) so will happily swing by the Post Office on my way in this morning
just a reminder to all Firedogs that so called small donations can make a difference - hit those buttons at the top !
p.s. y’all would have loved that impish Marcy grin on my face everytime I picked up the winger cash ; )
***A note to the folks following our Libby trial coverage: Court will resume this afternoon at 1:30 pm ET, along with our live coverage.***
Thanks. This helps. Foe some reason I thought it would resume this moring at 11.
So many sensible people, and one president who’s a madman. We DO have a king, Christy. At this point the only thing between us and Armageddon appears to be a mutiny in the armed forces. I doubt that’s very likely either. What a strange way for America to end. That a Democratic Congress acquiesces in it, I mean.
cbl — thank you for that, tickles me thinking of you flashing that grin in the face of the opposition while feeding our addiction. Heh.
Re: the WaPo article — this bit annoys me:
Umm, you mean “intercepted” as in breaching server security and stealing documents like Republicans did to the Democrats in Congress a couple years ago?
Or “intercepted”, as in somebody in the Republican ranks either leaked the email or sent it by email to an unvetted distribution list, or to a subscriber who may be Independent or a Democratic Party member?
It’s this subtle and stupid crap that continues to make the corporate media little more than propaganda outlets.
EPU’d from last thread:
111 Biodun says:
February 15th, 2007 at 7:02 am
Congratulations to the FDL Team, and especially to the live-blog team led by Jane, Christy, and Marcy (including Swopa and Pach). The NYTimes front-page article specifically mentioning FDL and Jane and Marcy is a big deal if only because the best well-researched US print daily has finally acknowledged the value of bloggers in news coverage, in the new calibration of news gathering, and most importantly, the arrival of new news media.
One final thing: The FDL Team did not seek out an article in the NYTimes. The editors and reporters chose to publish the article on the front page for their readers, which number over a million.
FDL rocks!
this is totally incorrect
the “prism of Iraq” is just ONE of the host of failures from this president
he was a failure before 9/11, he took the information that SHOULD have prevented 9/11 and enjoyed vacation, ignoring his most trusted aids to do SOMETHING, ANYTHING
he has shrunk the middle class, has squandered the largest surplus in history, replaced it with the largest deficit in history
has created the largest difference between the wealthy and the rest of us since the days of robber barons
has destroyed the reputation of the United States of America, has destroyed the dignity of the office of the president
he’s destroyed the image of our armed forces, has destroyed the ability of our armed forces
he’s squandered our treasure, our children’s future, our natural resources and the health of our environment
his legacy is in NO sense reliant on what happens in Iraq, Iraq is his greatest inept failure, it is by no means his only inept failure
Unfit for office. Dangerous. Incompetent. Mistaken priorities. Beholden to greed. Incapable of articulating how he can improve. Treasonous. Stupid. Embarrassing. Shallow-minded. Mentally handicapped.
What price is Bush paying to win? His own family won’t even serve in his war, so he’s not worrying about them coming to harm. He has nothing at stake except his legacy and he has convinced himself that he will be vindicated by history. He will retire to the bubble of the Bush family fortune, not even knowing that he is scorned.
Personally, I hope his legacy includes not just the Iraq war but the pemanent minimalization of the Republican Party. However, I don’t believe that Bush will ever understand his real legacy.
rayne–
Can you drop me a note? Jay at ackroyd.org.
Thanks Christy and all other contributors to FDL. I am soooooo angry on a daily basis that George Bush is ruining our country minute by minute. Yesterday’s press conference was the worst ever. The man is clearly delusional. Thanks FDL for providing real citizen journalism and TRUTH!
John H. Farr @ 8
I find it very disturbing that we are hoping for a military coup to save us. Historically, this tends not to work out so well. I have seen people too often getting a government they did not deserve to think it’s a universal truth, but damnit, if we do not use the safeguards built into the Constitution to get this madman and his gang out of power, then we will richly deserve whatever tyranny we get.
But our grandchildren?
And now he wants to invade Iran. I’m almost afraid I’ll go crazy if we do that. What the hell can he be thinking? We’re *losing* the war in Iraq; Iran is much better prepared for us than Iraq was. The latest Vanity Fair has an article on the subject—apparently there’s some design to return a member of the Shah’s family to power in Iran. ???
He definitely thinks he’s a king. He doesn’t know that he’s Mad King George—who lost the American colonies, after all. What will all of us lose if he does try attacking Iran?
Why is it that European royals were generally such poor monarchs? Because they had no grasp of reality, living in luxury and exercising absolute power. So, too, in addition to the Constitutional arguments, there is the pragmatic argument against letting the Executive continue to operate in a unitary manner.
Today’s Times informs us that General Franks projected that by now the US “would have as few as 5,000 troops in the country.” The US has consistently avoided true democratic institutions in Iraq under the deluded idea that they could better manage the political process out of Washington. The hubris rivals anything that came out of Versailles.
This is why if the Congress continues to act in their traditional way, as if the old checks and balances were still in place, they will not able to solve the problem. They need to awake to the new power dynamic and scrap non-binding legislation. Not just because the Constitution gives them responsibilities, but because, as Christy points out, the boy king is still spending off the blank check they issued him in the past.
Is anybody listening to this (chimpy at AEI)? I think I’m going to be sick.
HotFlash @ 17
the republicans are realizing the madness of this administration day by day.
I don’t think it will come to a coup, I think republicans will climb on board, congress and the senate will claim their wings, the republicans will reclaim their party, and this man will be prevented from destroying our country
time is though running out
HotFlash at 17 — I want to go on record as profoundly NOT hoping for a military coup. That would be horrible on a number of levels. Period. Just for the record.
OT–but not really:
Salon’s Sid Blumenthal’s take on the Libby defense strategy:
I know this is a little OT but I wanted to comment on the appearance of Speaker Pelosi on the NewsHour last night. What a class act!! A demonstration of real leadership. No bi-partisan vitriol or ad hominum attacks. I could not help comparing her performance with past performances by Newt Gingrich and Tom Delay. We are blessed to have a Speaker who is a uniter — not a divider.
steelthing — oh, thank YOU, for your patronage and support, helping FDL’s team get at the truth. And to all the rest of the FDL commenters and readers who’ve supported the cause with their kind and generous donations, keeping the bandwidth open and the lights on at Plame House!
jayackroyd — watch for an incoming momentarily.
Speculation: Vice has two words for FDL this morning: “( ) you!” Does our hearts good.
Gopofascists begone! Nancy is wearing the pants now.
Back to the important stuff…
BREAKING NEWS: Court hearing about Anna Nicole Smith’s body. WATCH LIVE.
(banner headline at msnbc.com)
_
Gee, I need a straight man. Why did I think the President would announce he was sending Jocelyn Elders to Iraq?
Because he needs a Democratic Surgin’ General.
“Bush is taking the long view”
Ha! To the end of his nose.
He has no long view. He sees, hears and acknowledges only his own fabricated version of things. And his court sycophants prop up his ego. He understands nothing that happens outside of his bubble. He has no knowledge of history, diplomacy or even warfare - his favorite tool.
He is the most dangerous kind of megalomaniac.
Biodun @ 23
IMHO, Sid’s missing the main gem here:
Aieeeee…I’m going to jail…boo hoooooo!
Or
How Libby’s Lawyer Fingered His Own Client!
I’m predicting that Scoots will get convicted, and that the conviction will singularly come about because of one unbelievable screw-up. A screw-up that was incredibly the result of Scoot’s own Superstar Defense Attorney, the Honorable Ted Wells.
To set the stage, here’s what good ol’ Teddy has been selling from day one in his opening argument as Scoot’s defense:
1. It was all Karl Rove’s fault that Valerie Plame was betrayed and her name leaked to the press!
Or if ya’ll in the Jury don’t like that tale, then how about this one:
2. Scoot’s can’t remember.
Now I may be a few cans short of a 12 pack here, but even I can figure out that those two tall tales kinda seriously contradict each other.
The 1st one implicitly says that yes, Scoots did leak Valerie Plame’s name to reporters, but Karl made him do it.
The 2nd one says that Scoots can’t remember leaking Valerie Plame’s name to reporters, so instead of lying and obstructing justice, he was simply forgetful in his Grand Jury testimony.
Ahmmmm…Teddy, do you see a problem here? You admitted in front of the jury that Scoots remembers, but it is Karl’s fault, and at the very same time, Scoots don’t remember nuthin’.
Sorry Teddy, but you can’t have it both ways.
And to make matters worse Teddy, you didn’t put on a scintilla of evidence during the entire trial that Karl made Scoots do it.
Ahmmmm…Teddy, were you playing hooky during Law 101 when they were teaching you legal beagles those Cardinal Rules thingies. You know, thingies like:
- Don’t promise stuff in opening that you can’t deliver?
- Don’t contradict your own self in your opening statement?
- Don’t open with a statement fingering your own client with the excuse that somebody else made him do it?
Ohhhhh boy…I can hear Scoots now:
“But…but…but they promised me! They said he was the best Defense Attorney that money could buy! Aieeeee..I’m going to jail…boo hoooooo!”
And to buttress my case a wee bit here, this little ol’ faux pas has even caught the eye of Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft who posted this over at The Huffington Post:
I can’t help but wonder how Teddy is going to “un-ring this bell”.
Like many, I can’t wait to hear Teddy’s closing arguments and how he’s gonna try to magically make the Jury forget about his very own opening statement admission that Karl made Scoots do it. Maybe Scoots can teach Teddy the best way for getting folks to forget stuff.
You’ll look great in orange Scooty-Doo!
lina @ 30
Paraphrasing Lewis Lapham: The world is populated by but two people. It is a place wherein Bush the Actor need only please Bush the Audience.
_
What I find particularly officious is the new Republican spin that the Iraquis are lazy and ungrateful, therefore we should withdraw immediately and let them swing.
Cut and run is the new Republican mantra.
Notice that Democrats are calling for redeployment.
Oversimplification and optimism got us into the mess.
The disease is not the cure.
One thing about the NYTimes article:
Because of its wide circulation and influence (yes, the paper still influences its constituents), The NYTimes has exposed FDL (and what it does) to a wider audience and readership. Traffic of course will pick up considerably, attracting all sorts of people, including saboteurs.
I’m sure the techies will be on the lookout for the bad eggs who might want to do a denial of service, for example. This is not paranoia. Shit happens.
If he says ‘young democracy’ once more I am going to puke.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 21
Azakly. But if Congress does not do their job that is the next bulwark. They have already failed spectacularly in the oversight responsibilities and time is very short with investigations only starting now. And I haven’t noticed the present admin crashing to a halt just because Rep Waxman is asking a few questions. The non-biting resolution with the 5 mninute speeches is nice. But it is not oversight, not checks and balances.
And time is running out. At the risk of invoking Condi, I don’t want to wait until the flaming asshole lets off a mushroom cloud. “No one could have foreseen that he’d nuke Iran.”
Congress listen up. I want to go on record as being against the political coup we’ve seen the last six years. Do your job.
Speaker Pelosi is showing us just how effective a leader a woman can be. So glad she is herding the cats in her House.
Christy: If I could write like you, I’d quit my day job.
mack @ 33
Rescue/Victim/Persecutor Triangle writ large.
_
ccmask at 38 — Awww, thanks. That’s such a lovely thing to say. *blushing*
Christy Hardin Smith @ 22
Don’t want a military coup - and there won’t be one. What we might see is people speaking out in greater numbers to their congressional representatives, to their newspapers, and greater numbers of people joining protests against the war. I think the level of anger at this administration is rising to the point where large numbers of non-politically active Americans are going to be speaking their minds and demanding change from their leaders.
The question is, will the public pressure matter? Or, is it too late - is the Iraq surge already well underway? Are the battleships in the Persian Gulf positioned to threaten Iran, while, as David Gergen said, our diplomatic strategy is to “poke them in the eye”?
The only chance we have of changing the direction of this administration is to speak out - loudly and often. Mobilize and inspire others to do the same. Push members of Congress to investigate, to legislate, to contain the President with all of the legal authority they have. We believe adequate investigations will unearth crimes and mismanagement, and this may stop Bush from beating the war drums - or even finishing out his Presidency.
(well, a girl can dream, can’t she? I can’t imagine he’ll step down or be removed from office. Best case scenario is that he is dramatically limited in what messes he can continue to make until January 2009).
HotFlash @ 36
Amen.
I’d like to donate $50.07 from my tax check today and I was wondering if a lurker would like to step out for the first time and match me…let me know. Thanks
LandOfTheFree @ 41
I think much of Iranian leadership would love for Bush to hit ‘em. Would be Bush’s penultimate failure, on every count you can think of.
_
Our military MUST OBEY all lawful orders. Period. To suggest anything else is the end of the Republic.
The answer is for the House Of Represenatives to take a very deep breath and defund this war.
That is the method provided by the Constitution for bringing the Commander in Chief to heel.
A military coup in the United States can happen only in “24.” Why will a military never happen in the US? Just watch the movie Seven Days in May (1964)
HotFlash @ 36
Even one of my Republican buddies, who is irate at Bush and the GOP now, says he is very concerned that Bush is going to ignite a nuclear war in the middle east.
Someone needs to get reigns on Bush and Cheney. And, someone needs to get to the bottom of what Mr. Rumsfeld has been doing in his Arlington office with seven assistants paid by the Pentagon. (I can’t find any stories indicating that this 6 week transition office has closed. I’d also like to know exactly what papers Rummy was sorting through, and what happened to them.)
These men have been dangerous to freedom. They’ve caused terrible harm to our nation in ways most people won’t even understand for decades. They need to be reigned in.
Is Bush addressing the AEI by torchlight??
-GSD
Christy — it is “discrete”, I think — discreet is something Dumbya does not understand.
If he really wants a Legacy he should be the first president to fall on his sword and resign after admitting his culpability.
Failing that he could acquire a real legacy, one that benfits the world tangibly, and confound us too, by closing the suppurating boil that skews the whole world, Israel.
First, to get their attention, calling in all the loans, beginning by freezing all Israeli balances. Then demand, under supervision, the dismantling of the Isrtaeli nuclear weapons, at the same time require absolute adherence to 242, 338 et seq. immediately. after this could ensue discussions about just how much territory might remain inhabited by the immigrants of the past 76 plus years.
Now that would be a real legacy. It would be amazing to see peace break out in the Near and Middle Easts.
As usual an excellent piece of writing Christy and obviously heartfelt. I too would like to go on record against any sort of military solution to our internal political mess. We will do it the way out forefathers intended us to do it. Within the rule of law and with the might of our convictions.
old gold @ 45
Lawful orders is the operative word.
-GSD
GOP = Party Before Country
GSD @ 50
Yes, and they are getting a lot of orders that are not lawful. My point is that we should not expect our military to have to do our job here. We need to make sure the orders they get are lawful. And that means BushCo has got to go, ‘coz he won’t just feel ashamed of himself and stop. And that’s a really good question, what is Rummy doing with a desk and a staff and security clearances and all?
radiofreewill @ 52
As succinct a characterization as is possible.
_
BobbyG @ 44
You’re right. Don’t forget this important quote:
http://www.upi.com/Internation.....038-4021r/
maunga at 49 — Oops — thanks. I missed that “tyop” in the read through before hitting publish. Thanks for the heads up!
Rummy is in deep Strangefeld mode.
There is a quiet movement under foot to use nuclear weapons.
I have heard it on several rightwing radio shows. Why have a weapon if you are unwilling to use it. You might as well not have that weapon period.
This is why I am so deeply worried about Bush’s newly found interest in US history. He evokes Truman quite a bit. Truman, loathed at the time he left office but heralded by historians.
Truman, the only president ever to use a nuclear weapon.
If you don’t think those thoughts are bouncing around Bush’s dissipated, dry-drunk pea-brain, think again.
-GSD
“An I want accountability now” You can say that again
Accountability for an intelligence snow job that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of dead and injured.
I do not want to hear the Pentagons Inspector General ( Senator Pat Roberts and Cheney’s pick for the investigation)call the creation, cherry picking and dissemination of false intelligence “inappropriate”. “Inappropriate” would apply to lies under oath about a b–w job. “Criminal” would apply to the use of false intelligence.
Write or call your reps. Write or call Senator Rockerfeller who is now the head of the Intelligence committee.. Demand that Phase II of the Senate Select Committee complete its investigation. Demand that the congress do more than slap the hands of the individuals who lied our nation into Iraq. Impeach the lower level officials (at JOhn Dean findlaw) so that they ( not the first time) are unable to slip into a future administration to do their dirty work.
The result of not holding these individuals accountable for the manipulation of false intelligence is their freedom to march our nation towards a confrontation with Iran.
Stimulating post..
Bush doesn’t really have many good options at this stage- he CAN’T back down on Iraq. It was a monkey trap…He put his hand in there ta grab the prize- and now he can’t get out- unless he lets loose of everthing. What’s “everything”?
He would have to admit that he was totally wrong about everything he has done foreign policy wise. He would have to admit that he listened to the wrong people, failed to adequately analyze the available evidence- and then lied to take the nation into a war that was a GIGANTIC blunder. He would have to admit that because of him- trillions of dollars and thousands of lives have gone down the sewer of his own construction. He would have to admit that he has blood on his hands- the blood of thousands- at a MINIMUM- a charge of negligent homocide could be leveled at him for each and every death…
Withdrawal is not an option- at least not without the partial cover of something he can call victory (notice how he keeps lowering the bar for “victory”)
He may have considered lowering our exposure in Iraq and hunkering down for the long term- he was probably told that if american troops were put in safe enclaves and kept out of the bloodletting going on now- the “nation” would be torn apart as if by wild dogs within a year.
He may have thought of continuing the current troop level and to just keep trucking- but it would be obvious to everyone that he was just continuing the same losing strategy against the evidence that it wasn’t working- had never worked- and had no promise of working.
He through just enough new troops in there to make it look as if he had changed something- but of course he didn’t. He’s backed into a corner- hoping something will turn up.
I think that most goopers know full well that their asses are in a huge crack here. They need to be on the way out of Iraq within a year- or they are about to totally lose political power- which means losing their funding advantage- which means losing MORE political power and so on. That’s why gooper politics is where the action is right now- they are fighting for their lives and they know it.
They have a pickle- most of em can’t openly repudiate Bush- the base still supports him- on the other hand- those in even marginally competitive districts can’t afford to be seen as blindly supporting him either. That’s why the non binding resolution is a brilliant political strategy- it causes GREAT PAIN to goopers.
Once a gooper gets on board the non binding express- he or she is showing commitment to getting the hell out of Iraq and is much more likely to support a resolution with real teeth..
That’s the game for the next twelve months- and as we get into the second half of that period- it will all get VERY deserate!
A belated (and I guess, OT in this thread) thanks to the folks at FDL for the Libby trial coverage. It’s been a valuable public service. The liveblogging alone would have been great, but you delivered legal commentary and clarification, color commentary, and focused nightly wrap-ups to boot. It’s obvious that a lot of preparation and planning went into this. Content, tech support, cooperation with other blogs, press appearances. Somebody (or bodies) was on top of every detail. It shows. Very professional job.
Congratulations on the well-deserved wider recognition FDL is getting. You’re sure to gain new readers, many of whom have not yet awakened to what our government is doing in our names, and how the corporate media abets it. It’s my hope that they will find enlightenment in the sharp analysis and pull-no-punches presentations of Jane, Christy, Pachacutec, TRex, and other featured posters and so many of the regular commenters here.
.
Who owns information? Anyone…? Anyone…? …Bueller?
That explains it…ReBushLickens are… uncertain.
“penultimate”–second to the last.
So what would be his ULTIMATE failure (last one)?
Headline in today’s LA Times:
Tehran’s Iraq role unclear, U.S. now says
But Bush calls it irrelevant that no solid evidence links Iranian officials to alleged weapons aid.
So if I say that Bush is using alcohol and drugs again, it’s irrelevant that there’s no solid evidence of it, and we should assume it’s true anyway? (One person I know who watched it said Shrub’s speech was slurred, as if he were drunk.)
What happened was this: The Libby team entered a “stipulation” into the record of the trial - a document stating the facts to which a witness would have testified about if he had been called to the stand. The stipulation covered the Daily Intelligence Briefings that Libby received every morning from employees of the CIA.
Thanks to the Web site firedoglake.com, we now have a very vivid sense of what those morning intelligence briefings must have been like in June and July 2003.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/02.....horetz.htm
HotFlash! OMG!!!
I just now saw your msg to me downstairs several threads ago.
http://www.firedoglake.com/200.....ent-505313
I haven’t had such a good laugh since… well… my memory’s not so good, but….
I owe you bigtime! Fwded the link to a buncha folk!
Absolutely priceless!
!707! ;->
oops, sorry. this link better…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5NVaUeMAA4
rwcole
I think the largest problem with Bush admitting he was wrong is that he (correctly in my estimation) might feel some jeopardy in the Hague.
ccmask @ 64
Not gonna open a column by Hairy Podhoretz. Not gonna do it.
ccmask @
43
ccmask - how about if a *mostly* lurker who has only commented a few times, makes her second donation as a match to yours?
Hitting the tip jar now. Gotta do it while I’m still employed, as continuing Libby trial obsession could result in a change in that status! : ) I’ve GOT to get something done today. Good thing court starts later….
Thanks, FDL, for the coverage.
rwcole @ 59
bingo, great analogy
their pickle is ended thus;
the republicans have contoll over “the base”…the “base” ARE base, they have no minds, they are marionettes
all they have to do is villainize the president and vice president as wayward, lost his soul, etc
Mack:
I don’t know of a human who could admit an error so massive- it would take a saint- and he is not one of those.
USA Today…
The trial of ‘Scooter’ Libby is perfect liberal blog fodder. It’s making a star of Firedoglake.com, which has six contributors working in rotation to cover the proceedings. They include a former prosecutor, a defense lawyer, a Ph.D. business consultant and a movie producer, who are living together in an apartment Real World-style during the trial. It’s also the first federal case for which independent bloggers have been given official credentials that traditional media get.
http://blogs.usatoday.com/mane.....fe_10.html
I may be late to this discussion but I want to say I just called Rep. Hoekstra-202 225 4401. His intern hung up on me before I was finished speaking. I don’t know what to do except call these people everyday. I just randomly pick two or three and call, but to get hung up on, and I was not rude, is not okay. Give this son of a bitch a call. I have no other sensible words to add other than the obvious-I am pissed, more so than I have ever been, I shamed by our actions and shamed by our president, and shamed by our legislators for their cowardly self serving actions.
leinie @ 68
Thanks Leinie….see you over there!!
GSD @ 57
I wish every time Bush and Truman are compared it is pointed out that Truman is the only person on the planet to have ordered the use of nuclear weapons against other human beings. And Bush wants to compare himself with Truman? Three carrier groups in the Gulf, “Divine Strake” bunker busting bomb tests in Nevada, Cheney visiting the House of Saud (follow the money?) hold on to your hats folks! This could get interesting.
The best thing that could happen to Bush and the goopers is to have the dems successfully pass a resolution to cut funds for Iraq and withdraw..
Goopers could then say for decades- “we had that thing almost won and the pacifist dems pulled the rug out from under us- we should never allow them to gain power again”.
Of course as it is, the dems don’t have the power or the votes to rescue the goopers from themselves- so they are stuck with a 24/7 demonstration of their own failure- the pain that cannot end.
OT–
Exclusive: Olbermann Re-Ups With MSNBC; Announcement Coming Thursday
If Congress clearly states to the military that political consequences of DISOBEYING an ILLEGAL ORDER - that of attacking a country NOT at WAR with the United States will be backed by the Congress and given protection by Congress for the refusal; the military would still be under civilian authority and a military coup would not be necessary to limit irrational demands upon them. FAILURE to make the political move will result in a military coup as the only act that can forstall the consequences of WH direction and the political overthrow of the Constitution by the Republican Party.
Not only are 3 carrier groups in the area, a fourth is arriving at the end of the month as well as having arranged temporary bases in Bulgaria and Romania. This is not happening just to be seen flexing “military muscle”, George the
turdthird has rattled his lips (something about lips seems a family trait).Cozumel says
February 15th, 2007 at 8:24 am
USA Today…
The trial of ‘Scooter’ Libby is perfect liberal blog fodder. It’s making a star of Firedoglake.com, which has six contributors working in rotation to cover the proceedings. They include a former prosecutor, a defense lawyer, a Ph.D. business consultant and a movie producer, who are living together in an apartment Real World-style during the trial. It’s also the first federal case for which independent bloggers have been given official credentials that traditional media get.
And to think - we knew ‘em before they got famous….
I’m having serious trial withdrawals today - and what is this work thing that I’m evidently supposed to have been doing?
Bush’s monarchial assumption reflect back to his idea of who he reports to–”a higher Father.”–according to Woodward.
He doesn’t, in his mind, report to the people– polls and elections be damned. He certainly doesn’t report to Congress–not even interested in the current debate. Still, Congress is the only hope to actually mitigate the effects of his actions, if not to stop the actions themsselves.
I have this theory that down deep he really needs and wants the Congress to act. As rwcole points out above, he’s really trapped in his current policies and attitudes. He is an alcoholic, after all, “dry” or not, and the First Step is admitting that things have become “unmanageable”. They have. the Second Step is to believe in a Power “greater than ourselves.” He says he does.
What he doesn’t recognize is that his Higher Power may be Congress. As one veteran AA member said to a newcomer who professed to not have a higher power,
“As low as you are, hell, everyone is a Higher Power to you right now. You need a Higher Power? I’m your freakin’ Higher Power.
Nice to meet you.”
So Congress needs to say to the President: “You need a Higher Power? You’re in luck–We’re your freakin’ Higher Power!’
Secretly (not that I care much), I think he’ll be grateful. He can blame the Congress for the ugliness which will unfortunately follow in our wake in Iraq, while dodging responsibility for the fact that he caused that ugliness and that it was bound to be worse if we had followed his path.
GSD @
48
funny…frightening
you’re gonna love this from think progress, my bold;
This is why Bush is comparing himself to Truman (from wiki):
My bold.
btw, gang — I’m going back to DC for Tuesday’s summations. Just booked my flight.
Rayne @
10
They used to leave them on photocopiers
frogger
Yep- that’s about it!
Here’s the