<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In The Spotlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:04:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raph Levien</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507443</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph Levien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Read “Jan 9″ for “Jan 11″. Mea cupla.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read “Jan 9″ for “Jan 11″. Mea cupla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph Levien</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507420</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph Levien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I basically rewrote the Wikipedia section on press coverage of the Lewis Libby trial. I think I did a pretty good job of balance, giving Cox and his MBA some (virtual ink) while reporting the facts as I was able to find them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interestingly enough, FDL announced their press credentials on Jan 3, and MBA on Jan 11. So even the NYT’s correction still seems to have the facts wrong. The correction reads, in entirety:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A front-page article on Thursday about bloggers covering the perjury trial of I. Lewis Libby Jr. referred imprecisely to the role of Robert A. Cox, president of the Media Bloggers Association, in securing credentials. Mr. Cox negotiated access for his association, which was the first blogger group to be granted credentials to cover the trial. He did not negotiate on behalf of firedoglake.com and other blogs that received their credentials later.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ll take this up with the NYT and see what happens.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I basically rewrote the Wikipedia section on press coverage of the Lewis Libby trial. I think I did a pretty good job of balance, giving Cox and his MBA some (virtual ink) while reporting the facts as I was able to find them.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, FDL announced their press credentials on Jan 3, and MBA on Jan 11. So even the NYT’s correction still seems to have the facts wrong. The correction reads, in entirety:</p>
<blockquote><p>A front-page article on Thursday about bloggers covering the perjury trial of I. Lewis Libby Jr. referred imprecisely to the role of Robert A. Cox, president of the Media Bloggers Association, in securing credentials. Mr. Cox negotiated access for his association, which was the first blogger group to be granted credentials to cover the trial. He did not negotiate on behalf of firedoglake.com and other blogs that received their credentials later.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I’ll take this up with the NYT and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Harry Whittington&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Whittington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egregious</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507402</link>
		<dc:creator>egregious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507402</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not referring to cancer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not referring to cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P J Evans</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507343</link>
		<dc:creator>P J Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507343</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Waxman’s getting answers (just not all of them):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/ats-ap_top13feb15,0,1759435.story?coll=la-ap-topnews-headlines&quot;&gt;Auditors: Billions Wasted in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer&lt;br /&gt;
1:39 PM PST, February 15, 2007 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is at risk of squandering significantly more money in an Iraq war and reconstruction effort that has already wasted, overcharged or poorly tracked $10 billion in taxpayer money, federal investigators said Thursday. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The three top auditors overseeing contract work in Iraq told a House committee that Defense and State department officials condoned or otherwise allowed poor accounting, repeated work delays, bloated expenses and payments for work shoddily or never done by U.S. contractors. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That problem could worsen, the Government Accountability Office said, given limited improvement so far by the Department of Defense even as the Bush administration prepares to boost the U.S. presence in Iraq. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David M. Walker, comptroller general of the GAO, Congress’ auditing arm, said his agency has been pointing out problems for years, only to be largely ignored or given lip service with little result.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waxman’s getting answers (just not all of them):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/ats-ap_top13feb15,0,1759435.story?coll=la-ap-topnews-headlines">Auditors: Billions Wasted in Iraq</a><br />
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer<br />
1:39 PM PST, February 15, 2007 </p>
<p><em>WASHINGTON — The U.S. government is at risk of squandering significantly more money in an Iraq war and reconstruction effort that has already wasted, overcharged or poorly tracked $10 billion in taxpayer money, federal investigators said Thursday. </em></p>
<p>The three top auditors overseeing contract work in Iraq told a House committee that Defense and State department officials condoned or otherwise allowed poor accounting, repeated work delays, bloated expenses and payments for work shoddily or never done by U.S. contractors. </p>
<p>That problem could worsen, the Government Accountability Office said, given limited improvement so far by the Department of Defense even as the Bush administration prepares to boost the U.S. presence in Iraq. </p>
<p>David M. Walker, comptroller general of the GAO, Congress’ auditing arm, said his agency has been pointing out problems for years, only to be largely ignored or given lip service with little result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph Levien</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507334</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph Levien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507334</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lindy: I see that, and am fixing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindy: I see that, and am fixing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507306</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-507113&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hugh @ 46&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Somewhat off topic, I was thinking of where I might look for some Scooter associations.  Some that come to mind are his defense fund and the list of PNAC members.  He also has had connections with RAND and currently the Hudson Institute.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I looked up his wiki article.  What I found there incidentally were several references to the MBA coverage of the Scooter trial.  Nothing about firedoglake’s coverage.  So I wonder if Mr. Cox has been doing some editing there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And apparently is STILL editing. When I went to the wiki page, there was a bit about FDL. When I went back to it just now, that part had been removed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-507113"><em>Hugh @ 46</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Somewhat off topic, I was thinking of where I might look for some Scooter associations.  Some that come to mind are his defense fund and the list of PNAC members.  He also has had connections with RAND and currently the Hudson Institute.  </p>
<p>I looked up his wiki article.  What I found there incidentally were several references to the MBA coverage of the Scooter trial.  Nothing about firedoglake’s coverage.  So I wonder if Mr. Cox has been doing some editing there.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And apparently is STILL editing. When I went to the wiki page, there was a bit about FDL. When I went back to it just now, that part had been removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph Levien</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507278</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph Levien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Before too many things get deleted, is there something I can do to help? The subject of good reporters finding life difficult fills me with anger (James Hatfield, anyone?). If it’s just money, I have some resources I can tap into.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before too many things get deleted, is there something I can do to help? The subject of good reporters finding life difficult fills me with anger (James Hatfield, anyone?). If it’s just money, I have some resources I can tap into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egregious</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507271</link>
		<dc:creator>egregious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507271</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You can watch safely from the shore, or you can plunge in and try to help someone.  I have seen this movie before and I don’t like the ending.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can watch safely from the shore, or you can plunge in and try to help someone.  I have seen this movie before and I don’t like the ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njr</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507255</link>
		<dc:creator>njr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/15/in-the-spotlight/#comment-507255</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;a place to look for Libby’s friends:&lt;br /&gt;
from Waas today&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;just before going to work for the vice president in 2001, the managing partner of the Washington office of an international law firm then named Dechert, Price, and Rhoads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a place to look for Libby’s friends:<br />
from Waas today</p>
<blockquote><p>just before going to work for the vice president in 2001, the managing partner of the Washington office of an international law firm then named Dechert, Price, and Rhoads.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
